UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
FORM
10-K
[X] ANNUAL
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
For
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009
OR
[ ]
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934
For the transition period from
_______
to _______
Commission
File Number 1-5684
W.W.
Grainger, Inc.
(Exact name of
registrant as specified in its charter)
|
Illinois
|
|
36-1150280
|
|
(State or
other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
|
100
Grainger Parkway, Lake Forest, Illinois
|
|
60045-5201
|
|
(Address of
principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip
Code)
|
|
(847)
535-1000
|
|
(Registrant’s
telephone number including area
code)
|
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each
class Name of each exchange on
which registered
Common Stock $0.50 par
value New
York Stock Exchange
Chicago Stock Exchange
Indicate by check
mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405
of the Securities Act. Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate by check
mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or
Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes [ ] No
[X]
Indicate by check
mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file
such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate by check
mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted
and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter)
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such files). Yes [X] No
[ ]
Indicate by check
mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s
knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by
reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
[X]
Indicate by check
mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
“large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company”
in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
| Large accelerated filer
[X] |
|
Non-accelerated filer [
] |
Smaller reporting company
[ ]
|
Indicate by check
mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Act). Yes [ ] No [X]
The aggregate market
value of the voting common equity held by nonaffiliates of the registrant was
$5,681,567,963 as of the close of trading as reported on the New York Stock
Exchange on June 30, 2009. The Company does not have nonvoting common
equity.
The
registrant had 72,424,927 shares of common stock outstanding as of January 31,
2010.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the
proxy statement relating to the annual meeting of shareholders of the registrant
to be held on April 28, 2010, are incorporated by reference into Part III
hereof.
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
|
Page(s)
|
|
PART
I
|
|
Item
1:
|
BUSINESS
|
3
|
|
|
|
THE
COMPANY
|
3
|
|
|
|
UNITED
STATES
|
|
3-4
|
|
|
|
CANADA
|
4
|
|
|
|
OTHER
BUSINESSES
|
|
|
4-5
|
|
|
|
SEASONALITY
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
COMPETITION
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
EMPLOYEES
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
WEB SITE
ACCESS TO COMPANY REPORTS
|
5
|
|
Item
1A:
|
RISK
FACTORS
|
5-6
|
|
Item
1B:
|
UNRESOLVED
STAFF COMMENTS
|
6
|
|
Item
2:
|
PROPERTIES
|
6-7
|
|
Item
3:
|
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
|
7-8
|
|
Item
4:
|
SUBMISSION OF
MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
|
8
|
|
Executive
Officers
|
|
|
|
8
|
| |
|
PART
II
|
|
Item
5:
|
MARKET FOR
REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED SHAREHOLDER
|
|
|
|
|
MATTERS AND
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
9-10
|
|
Item
6:
|
SELECTED
FINANCIAL DATA
|
10
|
|
Item
7:
|
MANAGEMENT’S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
|
|
|
|
|
CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
|
11-21 |
|
Item
7A:
|
QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
|
22
|
|
Item
8:
|
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
|
22
|
|
Item
9:
|
CHANGES IN AND
DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS
|
|
|
|
|
ON ACCOUNTING
AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
|
22
|
|
Item
9A:
|
CONTROLS AND
PROCEDURES
|
22
|
|
Item
9B:
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
22
|
| |
|
PART
III
|
|
Item
10:
|
DIRECTORS,
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
|
23
|
|
Item
11:
|
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
|
23
|
|
Item
12:
|
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND
RELATED
STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
|
23
|
|
Item
13:
|
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND
RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE
|
23
|
|
Item
14:
|
PRINCIPAL
ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
|
23
|
| |
|
PART
IV
|
|
Item
15:
|
EXHIBITS AND
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
|
24-25
|
|
Signatures
|
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
Certifications
|
|
|
|
|
65-68
|
PART
I
Item
1: Business
The
Company
W.W. Grainger, Inc.,
incorporated in the State of Illinois in 1928, distributes facilities
maintenance products and provides related services and information used by
businesses and institutions primarily in the United States, Canada, Japan and
Mexico to keep their facilities and equipment running. In this report, the words
“Grainger” or “Company” mean W.W. Grainger, Inc. and its
subsidiaries.
Grainger is the
leading broad-line supplier of facilities maintenance and other related products
and services in North America. Grainger uses a multichannel business model to
provide customers with a range of options for finding and purchasing products
utilizing sales representatives, direct marketing materials and
catalogs. Grainger serves approximately 2.0 million customers through
a network of highly integrated branches, distribution centers and multiple Web
sites.
During 2009,
Grainger acquired two businesses in the United States and one in
Canada. Grainger also obtained a controlling interest in a business
in India at 100% and in Japan at 53%. Their results are consolidated
with Grainger from the acquisition dates.
Grainger’s two
reportable segments are the United States and Canada. In the first
quarter of 2009, Grainger integrated the Lab Safety business into the Grainger
Industrial Supply business and results are now reported under the United States
segment. The Canada segment reflects the results for Acklands –
Grainger Inc. Other businesses include the following: MonotaRO Co.,
Ltd. (Japan), Grainger, S.A. de C.V. (Mexico), Grainger Industrial Supply India
Private Limited (India), Grainger Caribe Inc. (Puerto Rico), Grainger China LLC
(China) and Grainger Panama S.A. (Panama). These businesses generate
revenue through the distribution of facilities maintenance products and provide
related services and information. Prior year segment amounts have
been restated in a consistent manner. For segment and geographical
information and consolidated net sales and operating earnings see “Item
7: Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations” and Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Grainger has
internal business support functions that provide coordination and guidance in
the areas of accounting and finance, business development, communications and
investor relations, compensation and benefits, information systems, health and
safety, human resources, risk management, internal audit, legal, real estate,
security, tax and treasury. These services are provided in varying degrees to
all business units.
Grainger does not
engage in product research and development activities. Items are regularly added
to and deleted from Grainger’s product lines on the basis of customer demand,
market research, recommendations of suppliers, sales volumes and other
factors.
United
States
The
United States business offers a broad selection of facilities maintenance and
other products and provides related services and information through local
branches, catalogs and the Internet. In the first quarter of 2009, the Lab
Safety business was integrated into the U.S. branch-based business. In addition,
two companies were acquired in 2009, Imperial Supplies LLC (Imperial) and
Alliance Energy Solutions (Alliance), further broadening the product offering of
the United States business. Imperial is a national distributor of quality
maintenance products and aftermarket components for the vehicle and fleet
industry; Alliance offers value-added services that help customers drive energy
efficiency and productivity, with particular expertise in the area of lighting
retrofits.
Grainger’s United
States business offers a combination of product breadth, local availability,
speed of delivery, detailed product information and competitively priced
products and services. Products offered include material handling equipment,
safety and security supplies, lighting and electrical products, power and hand
tools, pumps and plumbing supplies, cleaning and maintenance supplies, forestry
and agriculture equipment, building and home inspection supplies, vehicle and
fleet components and many other items primarily focused on the facilities
maintenance market. Services offered include inventory management and energy
efficiency solutions.
The
United States business operates more than 400 branches located in all 50 states.
These branches are located in close proximity to the majority of U.S. businesses
and serve the immediate needs of customers in their local markets by allowing
them to pick up items directly from the branches. Branches range in
size from small branches to large master branches. The branch network has
approximately 5,000 employees who primarily fulfill counter and will-call
product needs and provide customer service. An average branch is 22,000 square
feet in size, has 12 employees and handles about 110 transactions per day. In
2009, three branches were opened and 17 branches were closed.
The logistics
network is comprised of a network of 14 distribution centers (DCs) of various
sizes, four of which were acquired in a business acquisition during 2009.
Automated equipment and processes in the larger DCs allow them to handle the
majority of the customer shipping for next day availability and replenish over
400 branches that provide same day availability.
The
business has a sales force of approximately 2,400 professionals who help
businesses and institutions select the right products to reduce operating
expenses and improve cash flow, and find immediate solutions to maintenance
problems. Customers range from small and medium-sized businesses to large
corporations, governmental entities and other institutions and are primarily
represented by purchasing managers or workers in facilities maintenance
departments and service shops across a wide range of industries such as:
manufacturing, hospitality, transportation, government, retail, healthcare and
education. Sales transactions during 2009 were made to approximately 1.7 million
customers averaging 95,000 daily transactions. No single customer accounted for
more than 5% of total sales.
The
majority of the products sold by the United States business are national branded
products. Approximately 24% of 2009 sales consisted of private label
items bearing Grainger’s registered trademarks, including DAYTON® motors,
SPEEDAIRE® air compressors, AIR HANDLER® air filtration equipment, DEM-KOTE®
spray paints, WESTWARD® tools, CONDOR™ safety products and LUMAPRO® lighting
products. Grainger has taken steps to protect these trademarks against
infringement and believes that they will remain available for future use in its
business. Sales of the remaining items generally consisted of products carrying
the names of other well-recognized brands.
The
Grainger catalog, most recently issued in February 2010, offers approximately
307,000 facilities maintenance and other products and is used by customers,
sales representatives and branch personnel to assist in customer product
selection. Approximately 2.4 million copies of the catalog were produced. In
addition, Grainger’s United States business issues target catalogs for its
multiple branded products, as well as other marketing materials.
Customers can also
purchase products through grainger.com. With access to more than 600,000
products, grainger.com serves as a prominent channel for the United States
business. Grainger.com provides real-time price and product
availability and detailed product information and offers advanced features such
as product search and compare capabilities. For customers with sophisticated
electronic purchasing platforms, Grainger utilizes technology that allows these
systems to communicate directly with grainger.com. Customers can also
purchase products through several other branded Web sites.
The
United States business purchases products for sale from approximately 2,300 key
suppliers, most of which are manufacturers. No single supplier comprised more
than 2% of total purchases and no significant difficulty has been encountered
with respect to sources of supply.
Through a global
sourcing operation, the business procures competitively priced, high-quality
products produced outside the United States from approximately
340 suppliers. Grainger sells these items primarily under private label
brands. Products obtained through the global sourcing operation include DAYTON®
motors, WESTWARD® tools, LUMAPRO® lighting products and CONDOR™ safety products,
as well as products bearing other trademarks.
Canada
Acklands – Grainger
is Canada’s leading broad-line distributor of industrial and safety supplies. In
2009, Acklands – Grainger acquired substantially all of the assets of the
K&D Pratt Industrial Division, a distributor of industrial and safety
products located in eastern Canada. The Canadian business serves
customers through more than 160 branches and five DCs across Canada. Acklands –
Grainger distributes tools, fasteners, safety supplies, instruments, welding and
shop equipment, and many other items. During 2009, approximately 13,000 sales
transactions were completed daily. A comprehensive catalog, printed in both
English and French, showcases the product line to facilitate the customer’s
product selection. This catalog, with more than 75,000 products, is used by
customers, sales account managers and branch personnel to assist in customer
product selection. In addition, customers can purchase products through
acklandsgrainger.com, a fully bilingual website.
Other
Businesses
Included in the
other businesses are the operations in Japan, Mexico, India, Puerto Rico, China,
and Panama. The more significant businesses in this group are
described below.
Japan
Grainger operates in
Japan through a 53% interest in MonotaRO Co., Ltd.
(MonotaRO). MonotaRO provides small and mid-sized domestic businesses
with products that help them operate and maintain their
facilities. MonotaRO is a catalog and a Web-based direct marketer
with approximately 70 percent of orders being conducted through the company’s
Web site, monotaro.com.
Mexico
Grainger’s
operations in Mexico provide local businesses with facilities maintenance
products and other products from both Mexico and the United States. Mexico
distributes products through a network of DCs and branches where customers have
access to approximately 59,000 products through a Spanish-language catalog and
through grainger.com.mx.
China
Grainger operates in
China from a DC in Shanghai and has 10 sales offices throughout China that allow
sales representatives to work remotely and meet with customers. Customers have
access to approximately 59,000 products through a Chinese-language catalog and
through grainger.com.cn.
Seasonality
Grainger’s business
in general is not seasonal, however, there are some products that typically sell
more often during the winter or summer season. In any given month,
unusual weather patterns, i.e., unusually hot or cold weather, could impact the
sales volumes of these products, either positively or negatively.
Competition
Grainger faces
competition in all markets it serves, from manufacturers (including some of its
own suppliers) that sell directly to certain segments of the market, wholesale
distributors, catalog houses, retail enterprises and Internet-based
businesses.
Grainger provides
local product availability, a broad product line, sales representatives,
competitive pricing, catalogs (which include product descriptions and, in
certain cases, extensive technical and application data), electronic and
Internet commerce technology and other services such as inventory management and
energy efficiency solutions to assist customers in lowering their total
facilities maintenance costs. Grainger believes that it can effectively compete
with manufacturers on small orders, but manufacturers may have an advantage in
filling large orders.
Grainger serves a
number of diverse markets. Based on available data, Grainger estimates the North
American market for facilities maintenance and related products to be more than
$160 billion, of which Grainger’s share is approximately 4 percent. There
are several large competitors, although most of the market is served by small
local and regional competitors.
Employees
As
of December 31, 2009, Grainger had 18,000 employees, of whom 16,500 were
full-time and 1,500 were part-time or temporary. Grainger has never had a major
work stoppage and considers employee relations to be good.
Web
Site Access to Company Reports
Grainger makes
available, free of charge, through its Web site, its Annual Report on Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, proxy statements
and amendments to those reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after this
material is electronically filed with or furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission. This material may be accessed by visiting grainger.com/investor.
Item
1A: Risk Factors
The
following is a discussion of significant risk factors relevant to Grainger’s
business that could adversely affect its financial position or results of
operations.
Weakness
in the economy could negatively impact Grainger’s sales growth. Economic
and industry trends affect Grainger’s business environments. Economic downturns
can cause customers to idle or close facilities, delay purchases and otherwise
reduce their ability to purchase Grainger’s products and services as well as
their ability to make full and timely payments. Thus, a significant or prolonged
slowdown in economic activity could negatively impact Grainger’s sales growth
and results of operations. The recent global economic crisis has had a negative
effect on Grainger’s sales.
The
facilities maintenance industry is highly fragmented, and changes in competition
could result in a decreased demand for Grainger’s products and services.
There are several large competitors in the industry, although most of the
market is served by small local and regional competitors. Grainger faces
competition in all markets it serves, from manufacturers (including some of its
own suppliers) that sell directly to certain segments of the market, wholesale
distributors, catalog houses, retail enterprises and Internet-based businesses.
Competitive pressures could adversely affect Grainger’s sales and
profitability.
Volatility
in commodity prices may adversely affect operating margins. Some of
Grainger’s products contain significant amounts of commodity-priced materials,
such as steel, copper, or oil, and are subject to price changes based upon
fluctuations in the commodities market. Grainger’s ability to pass on increases
in costs depends on market conditions. The inability to pass along costs
increases could result in lower operating margins. In addition, higher prices
could impact demand for these products resulting in lower sales
volumes.
Unexpected
product shortages could negatively impact customer relationships, resulting in
an adverse impact on results of operations. Grainger’s competitive
strengths include product selection and availability. Products are purchased
from approximately 3,400 key suppliers, no one of which accounted for more than
2% of total purchases. Historically, no significant difficulty has been
encountered with respect to sources of supply; however,
economic
downturns can
adversely affect a supplier’s ability to manufacture or deliver products. If
Grainger were to experience difficulty in obtaining products, there could be a
short-term adverse effect on results of operations and a longer-term adverse
effect on customer relationships and Grainger’s reputation. In addition,
Grainger has strategic relationships with key vendors. In the event Grainger was
unable to maintain those relations, there might be a loss of competitive pricing
advantages which could, in turn, adversely affect results of
operations.
The
addition of new product lines could impact future sales growth. Grainger,
from time to time, expands the breadth of its offerings by increasing the number
of products it distributes. In 2006, Grainger launched a multiyear product line
expansion program. The continued success of this program is expected to be a
driver of growth in 2010 and beyond. Its success will depend on Grainger’s
ability to accurately forecast market demand, obtain products from suppliers and
effectively integrate these products into the supply chain. As such, there is a
risk that the product line expansion program will not deliver the expected
results which could negatively impact anticipated future sales
growth.
Interruptions
in the proper functioning of information systems could disrupt operations and
cause unanticipated increases in costs and/or decreases in revenues. The
proper functioning of Grainger’s information systems is critical to the
successful operation of its business. Although Grainger’s information systems
are protected with robust backup systems, including physical and software
safeguards and remote processing capabilities, information systems are still
vulnerable to natural disasters, power losses, unauthorized access,
telecommunication failures and other problems. If critical information systems
fail or are otherwise unavailable, Grainger’s ability to process orders,
maintain proper levels of inventories, collect accounts receivable, pay expenses
and maintain the security of Company and customer data, could be adversely
affected.
In
order to compete, Grainger must attract, retain and motivate key employees, and
the failure to do so could have an adverse effect on results of
operations. In order to compete and have continued growth,
Grainger must attract, retain and motivate executives and other key employees,
including those in managerial, technical, sales, marketing and support
positions. Grainger competes to hire employees and then must train them and
develop their skills and competencies. Grainger’s operating results could be
adversely affected by increased costs due to increased competition for
employees, higher employee turnover or increased employee benefit
costs.
Fluctuations
in foreign currency have an effect on reported results of
operations. Foreign currency exchange rates and fluctuations
have an impact on sales, costs and cash flows from international operations, and
could affect reported financial performance.
Acquisitions
involve a number of inherent risks, any of which could result in the benefits
anticipated not being realized and have an adverse effect on results of
operations. Acquisitions,
both foreign and domestic, involve various inherent risks, such as uncertainties
in assessing the value, strengths, weaknesses, liabilities and potential
profitability of acquired companies. There is a risk of potential losses of key
employees of an acquired business and an ability to achieve identified operating
and financial synergies anticipated to result from an
acquisition. Additionally, problems could arise from the integration
of the acquired business including unanticipated changes in the business
or industry, or general economic conditions that affect the assumptions
underlying the acquisition. Any one or more of these factors could
cause Grainger not to realize the benefits anticipated to result from the
acquisitions or have a negative impact on the fair value of the reporting units.
Accordingly, goodwill and intangible assets recorded as a result of acquisitions
could become impaired.
Item
1B: Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
Item
2: Properties
As of December 31,
2009, Grainger’s owned and leased facilities totaled 22.4 million square feet,
an increase of approximately 8% from December 31, 2008. This increase is
primarily the result of business acquisitions. Additionally, in 2009
Grainger purchased a facility of approximately one million square feet for a new
distribution center in Illinois to be opened in 2012. Land was also
purchased in California for a new distribution center to be opened in
2011. The United States business and Acklands – Grainger
accounted for the majority of the total square footage. Acklands – Grainger
facilities are located throughout Canada.
Branches in the
United States range in size from 1,300 to 109,000 square feet. Most are located
in or near major metropolitan areas with many located in industrial parks.
Typically, a branch is on one floor, consists primarily of warehouse space,
sales areas and offices and has off-the-street parking for customers and
employees. Distribution centers in the United States range in size from 45,000
to 1,300,000 square feet. Grainger believes that its properties are generally in
excellent condition and well maintained.
A
brief description of significant facilities follows:
|
Location
|
|
Facility and
Use (6)
|
|
Size in Square
Feet (in 000’s)
|
|
United States
(1)
|
|
423 United
States branch locations
|
|
9,371
|
|
United States
(2)
|
|
14
Distribution Centers
|
|
5,821
|
|
United States
(3)
|
|
Other
facilities
|
|
2,028
|
|
Canada
(4)
|
|
173 Acklands –
Grainger facilities
|
|
2,401
|
|
Other
Businesses (5)
|
|
Other
facilities
|
|
1,409
|
|
Chicago
Area
|
|
Headquarters
and General Offices
|
|
1,327
|
|
|
|
Total Square
Feet
|
|
22,357
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
United States
branches consist of 288 owned and 135 leased properties. Most leases
expire between 2010 and 2018.
|
|
(2)
|
These
facilities are primarily owned.
|
|
(3)
|
These
facilities include both owned and leased locations, consisting of storage
facilities, office space, and idle properties including the one million
square foot facility for a new distribution center in
Illinois.
|
|
(4)
|
Acklands –
Grainger facilities consist of general offices, distribution centers and
branches, of which 58 are owned and 115
leased.
|
|
(5)
|
These
facilities include owned and leased locations in Japan, Mexico, India,
Puerto Rico, China and Panama.
|
|
(6)
|
Owned
facilities are not subject to any
mortgages.
|
Item
3: Legal Proceedings
Grainger has been
named, along with numerous other nonaffiliated companies, as a defendant in
litigation in various states involving asbestos and/or silica. These lawsuits
typically assert claims of personal injury arising from alleged exposure to
asbestos and/or silica as a consequence of products purportedly distributed by
Grainger. As of February 2, 2010, Grainger is named in cases filed on behalf of
approximately 1,900 plaintiffs in which there is an allegation of exposure to
asbestos and/or silica. Grainger has denied, or intends to deny, the
allegations in all of the above-described lawsuits.
In
2009, lawsuits relating to asbestos and/or silica and involving approximately
470 plaintiffs were dismissed with respect to Grainger, typically based on the
lack of product identification. If a specific product distributed by Grainger is
identified in any of these lawsuits, Grainger would attempt to exercise
indemnification remedies against the product manufacturer. In addition, Grainger
believes that a substantial number of these claims are covered by
insurance. Grainger has entered agreements with its major insurance
carriers relating to the scope, coverage and costs of defense. While
Grainger is unable to predict the outcome of these lawsuits, it believes that
the ultimate resolution will not have, either individually or in the aggregate,
a material adverse effect on Grainger’s consolidated financial position or
results of operations.
Grainger is a party
to a contract with the United States General Services Administration (the “GSA”)
first entered into in 1999 and subsequently extended in 2004. The GSA
contract had been the subject of an audit performed by the GSA’s Office of the
Inspector General. In December 2007, the Company received a letter
from the Commercial Litigation Branch of the Civil Division of the Department of
Justice (the “DOJ”) regarding the GSA contract. The letter suggested that the
Company had not complied with its disclosure obligations and the contract’s
pricing provisions, and had potentially overcharged government customers under
the contract.
Discussions relating
to the Company’s compliance with its disclosure obligations and the contract’s
pricing provisions are ongoing. The timing and outcome of these
discussions are uncertain and could include settlement or civil litigation by
the DOJ to recover, among other amounts, treble damages and penalties under the
False Claims Act. While this matter is not expected to have a
material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, an unfavorable
resolution could result in significant payments by the Company. The
Company continues to believe that it has complied with the GSA contract in all
material respects.
Grainger is a party
to a contract with the United States Postal Service (the “USPS”) entered into in
2003 covering the sale of certain Maintenance Repair and Operating Supplies (the
“MRO Contract”). The Company received a subpoena dated August 29,
2008, from the USPS Office of Inspector General seeking information about the
Company’s pricing compliance under the MRO Contract. The Company has
provided responsive information to the USPS but no substantive discussions have
yet begun.
Grainger is also a
party to a contract with the USPS entered into in 2001 covering the sale of
certain janitorial and custodial items (the “Custodial
Contract”). The Company received a subpoena dated June 30, 2009, from
the USPS Office of Inspector General seeking information about the Company’s
pricing practices and compliance under the Custodial Contract. The
Company has provided responsive information to the USPS but no substantive
discussions have yet begun.
The
timing and outcome of the USPS investigations of the MRO Contract and the
Custodial Contract are uncertain and could include settlement or civil
litigation by the USPS to recover, among other amounts treble damages and
penalties under the False Claims Act. While these matters are
not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial
position, an unfavorable resolution could result in significant payments by
the Company. The Company continues to believe that it has complied
with each of the MRO Contract and the Custodial Contract in all material
respects.
In
addition to the foregoing, from time to time Grainger is involved in various
other legal and administrative proceedings that are incidental to its business,
including claims relating to product liability, premises liability, general
negligence, environmental issues, employment, intellectual property and other
matters. As a government contractor selling to Federal, state and local
governmental entities, Grainger is also subject to governmental or regulatory
inquiries or audits or other proceedings, including those related to pricing
compliance. It is not expected that the ultimate resolution of any of these
matters will have, either individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse
effect on Grainger’s consolidated financial position or results of
operations.
Item
4: Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
No
matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter
of 2009.
Executive
Officers
Following is
information about the Executive Officers of Grainger including age as of
February 25, 2010. Executive Officers of Grainger generally serve until the
next annual election of officers, or until earlier resignation or
removal.
|
Name
and Age
|
|
Positions
and Offices Held and Principal
Occupation
and Employment During the Past Five Years
|
|
Court D.
Carruthers (37)
|
|
President,
Grainger International, a position assumed in 2009, and Senior Vice
President of Grainger, a position assumed in 2007. Previously,
Mr. Carruthers served as President of Acklands – Grainger
Inc., a position assumed in 2006. Prior to assuming the
last-mentioned position, he served as Vice President, National Accounts
and Sales of Acklands – Grainger Inc., a position assumed in
2002 when he joined that company.
|
|
Nancy A. Hobor
(63)
|
|
Senior Vice
President, Communications and Investor Relations, a position assumed in
1999.
|
|
John L. Howard
(52)
|
|
Senior Vice
President and General Counsel, a position assumed in 2000.
|
|
Gregory S.
Irving (51)
|
|
Vice President
and Controller, a position assumed in 2008. Previously, Mr. Irving
served as Vice President, Finance, for
Acklands – Grainger Inc. since 2004. After
joining Grainger in 1999 he served in various management positions
including Vice President, Financial Services and Director, Internal
Audit.
|
|
Ronald L.
Jadin (49)
|
|
Senior Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer, a position assumed in 2008.
Previously, Mr. Jadin served as Vice President and Controller, a
position assumed in 2006 after serving as Vice President,
Finance. Upon joining Grainger in 1998, he served as Director,
Financial Planning and Analysis.
|
|
Donald G.
Macpherson (42)
|
|
Senior Vice
President, Global Supply Chain, a position assumed in 2008.
Mr. Macpherson joined Grainger in 2008 as Senior Vice President,
Supply Chain. Before joining Grainger, he was Partner and
Managing Director of the Boston Consulting Group, a global management
consulting firm and advisor on business strategy.
|
|
Michael A.
Pulick (45)
|
|
Senior Vice
President and President, Grainger U.S., a position assumed in 2008 after
serving as Senior Vice President of Customer Service, a position assumed
in 2006. After joining Grainger in 1999, Mr. Pulick has
held a number of increasingly responsible positions in Grainger’s supplier
and product management areas including Vice President, Product Management
and Vice President, Merchandising.
|
|
James T. Ryan
(51)
|
|
Chairman of
the Board, President, and Chief Executive Officer, positions assumed in
2009, 2006, and 2008, respectively. Mr. Ryan became Chief
Operating Officer and was appointed to Grainger’s Board of Directors in
2007. Prior to that, Mr. Ryan served as Group President, a
position assumed in 2004. He has served Grainger in
increasingly responsible roles since 1980, including Executive Vice
President, Marketing, Sales and Service; Vice President, Information
Services; President, grainger.com; and President, Grainger
Parts.
|
PART
II
Item
5: Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Shareholder Matters
and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Market
Information and Dividends
Grainger’s common
stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange and the Chicago Stock Exchange,
with the ticker symbol GWW. The high and low sales prices for the common stock
and the dividends declared and paid for each calendar quarter during 2009 and
2008 are shown below.
|
|
|
|
Prices
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
2009
|
First
|
|
$ |
81.18 |
|
|
$ |
59.95 |
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
86.36 |
|
|
|
68.61 |
|
|
|
0.46 |
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
91.55 |
|
|
|
77.67 |
|
|
|
0.46 |
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
102.54 |
|
|
|
85.24 |
|
|
|
0.46 |
|
|
|
Year
|
|
$ |
102.54 |
|
|
$ |
59.95 |
|
|
$ |
1.78 |
|
|
2008
|
First
|
|
$ |
87.92 |
|
|
$ |
69.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
93.12 |
|
|
|
75.94 |
|
|
|
0.40 |
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
93.99 |
|
|
|
79.66 |
|
|
|
0.40 |
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
86.90 |
|
|
|
58.86 |
|
|
|
0.40 |
|
|
|
Year
|
|
$ |
93.99 |
|
|
$ |
58.86 |
|
|
$ |
1.55 |
|
Grainger expects
that its practice of paying quarterly dividends on its Common Stock will
continue, although the payment of future dividends is at the discretion of
Grainger’s Board of Directors and will depend upon Grainger’s earnings, capital
requirements, financial condition and other factors.
Holders
The
approximate number of shareholders of record of Grainger’s common stock as of
January 26, 2010, was 1,000 with approximately 52,000 additional shareholders
holding stock through nominees.
Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities – Fourth Quarter
|
Period
|
|
Total
Number
of Shares
Purchased (A)
|
|
|
Average Price
Paid per Share
(B)
|
|
|
Total Number
of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs
(C)
|
|
|
Maximum Number
of Shares that May
Yet Be
Purchased Under the
Plans or
Programs
|
|
Oct. 1 –
Oct. 31
|
|
|
747,603 |
|
|
$ |
95.19 |
|
|
|
747,603 |
|
|
|
4,935,977 |
|
shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov. 1 –
Nov. 30
|
|
|
1,085,665 |
|
|
$ |
95.49 |
|
|
|
1,085,665 |
|
|
|
3,850,312 |
|
shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec. 1 –
Dec. 31
|
|
|
769,840 |
|
|
$ |
98.04 |
|
|
|
769,840 |
|
|
|
3,080,472 |
|
shares
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2,603,108 |
|
|
$ |
96.58 |
|
|
|
2,603,108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A)
|
There were no
shares withheld to satisfy tax withholding obligations in connection with
the vesting of employee restricted stock
awards.
|
|
(B)
|
Average price
paid per share includes any commissions paid and includes only those
amounts related to purchases as part of publicly announced plans or
programs.
|
|
(C)
|
Purchases were
made pursuant to a share repurchase program approved by Grainger’s Board
of Directors on April 30, 2008. The Board of Directors granted
authority to repurchase up to 10 million shares. The program
has no specified expiration date. No share repurchase plan or
program expired or was terminated during the period covered by this
report. Activity is reported on a trade date
basis.
|
Company
Performance
The
following stock price performance graph compares the cumulative total return on
an investment in Grainger common stock with the cumulative total return of an
investment in each of the Dow Jones US Industrial Suppliers Total Stock Market
Index and the S&P 500 Stock Index. It covers the period
commencing December 31, 2004, and ending December 31, 2009. The graph assumes
that the value for the investment in Grainger common stock and in each index was
$100 on December 31, 2004, and that all dividends were reinvested.
|
|
|
December
31,
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
W.W. Grainger,
Inc.
|
|
$ |
100 |
|
|
$ |
108 |
|
|
$ |
108 |
|
|
$ |
138 |
|
|
$ |
126 |
|
|
$ |
159 |
|
|
Dow
Jones US Industrial Suppliers
Total Stock
Market Index
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
S&P 500
Stock Index
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
Item
6: Selected Financial Data
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands
of dollars, except for per share amounts)
|
|
|
Net
sales
|
|
$ |
6,221,991 |
|
|
$ |
6,850,032 |
|
|
$ |
6,418,014 |
|
|
$ |
5,883,654 |
|
|
$ |
5,526,636 |
|
|
Net earnings
attributable to W.W. Grainger, Inc.
|
|
|
430,466 |
|
|
|
475,355 |
|
|
|
420,120 |
|
|
|
383,399 |
|
|
|
346,324 |
|
|
Net earnings
per basic share*
|
|
|
5.70 |
|
|
|
6.07 |
|
|
|
5.01 |
|
|
|
4.36 |
|
|
|
3.87 |
|
|
Net earnings
per diluted share*
|
|
|
5.62 |
|
|
|
5.97 |
|
|
|
4.91 |
|
|
|
4.24 |
|
|
|
3.78 |
|
|
Total
assets
|
|
|
3,726,332 |
|
|
|
3,515,417 |
|
|
|
3,094,028 |
|
|
|
3,046,088 |
|
|
|
3,107,921 |
|
|
Long-term debt
(less current maturities)
|
|
|
437,500 |
|
|
|
488,228 |
|
|
|
4,895 |
|
|
|
4,895 |
|
|
|
4,895 |
|
|
Cash dividends
paid per share
|
|
$ |
1.780 |
|
|
$ |
1.550 |
|
|
$ |
1.340 |
|
|
$ |
1.110 |
|
|
$ |
0.920 |
|
*In the first
quarter of 2009, Grainger adopted authoritative guidance on “Determining Whether
Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating
Securities.” As a result, earnings per share were calculated under the new
accounting guidance for 2009, and restated for 2008 and
2007. Earnings per share for 2006 and 2005 were calculated using the
treasury stock method and not restated because it was not practical and the
impact is not considered material.
For
further information see “Item
7: Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations.”
Item
7: Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations
Overview
General. Grainger
distributes facilities maintenance products and provides related services and
information used by businesses and institutions primarily in the United States,
Canada, Japan and Mexico to keep their facilities and equipment running.
Grainger has two reportable segments: the United States and
Canada. Grainger integrated the Lab Safety Supply business into the
Grainger Industrial Supply business in 2009 and results are now reported under
the United States segment. The Canada segment reflects the results
for Acklands – Grainger Inc. Other businesses include the following:
MonotaRO Co., Ltd. (Japan), Grainger, S.A. de C.V. (Mexico), Grainger Industrial
Supply India Private Limited (India), Grainger Caribe Inc. (Puerto Rico),
Grainger China LLC (China) and Grainger Panama S.A. (Panama). Grainger
uses a multichannel business model to provide customers with a range of options
for finding and purchasing products utilizing sales representatives, direct
marketing materials and catalogs. Grainger serves approximately 2.0 million
customers through a network of highly integrated branches, distribution centers
and multiple Web sites.
Business
Environment. Several
economic factors and industry trends shape Grainger’s business environment and
projections for the coming year. Historically, Grainger’s sales trends have
tended to correlate positively with industrial production and non-farm
payrolls. In February 2010, Consensus Forecast-USA reported a 2009
decline of 9.7% and 2.4% for Industrial Production and GDP,
respectively. According to the Federal Reserve, non-farm payrolls
decreased 3.1% from December 2008 to December 2009. The continued
decline in the economy affected Grainger’s sales growth for 2009, which declined
9 percent.
In
February 2010, Consensus Forecast-USA projected 2010 GDP growth of 3.1% and
Industrial Production growth of 4.9% for the United States. In February 2010,
Consensus Forecast-USA projected GDP growth of 2.7% for Canada, as compared with
a 2.5% estimated decline in 2009.
The
light and heavy manufacturing customer sectors, which comprised
approximately 24% of Grainger’s total 2009 sales, have historically
correlated with manufacturing employment levels and manufacturing production.
Manufacturing employment levels in the United States declined approximately 9.9%
from December 2008 to December 2009, while manufacturing output decreased 1.3%
from December 2008 to December 2009. This decline in manufacturing employment
and output contributed to a mid 20 percent decline in the heavy manufacturing
customer sector and a high single-digit decline in the light manufacturing
customer sector for Grainger in 2009.
Outlook. While
in early 2010 there are some initial signs of improvement in the overall
economy, job growth is expected to lag the economic
recovery. Grainger expects positive sales growth in 2010 of 6 to 10
percent which will be realized through the impact of acquisitions made in 2009,
favorable foreign exchange rates and organic growth. Beginning in
2006, Grainger has added approximately 234,000 new products as part of its
multiyear product line expansion program in the United States, of which 70,000
were added to the 2010 catalog, issued in February. Products were
added to supplement the plumbing, fastener, material handling and security
product lines. The product line expansion program has been a positive
contributor to sales since being launched, and is expected to continue to be a
driver of growth in 2010 and beyond. Grainger plans to continue to invest in the
business and may choose to fund some additional sales and marketing programs to
increase market share if sales trends accelerate in 2010.
Operating expenses
are expected to increase in 2010 compared to 2009, due in part to incremental
expenses from the businesses acquired in 2009. In addition, part of
the expenses eliminated in 2009 as a result of lowering the cost structure will
return, such as merit increases and incentive compensation. Grainger
expects some reduction in operating expenses in 2010 from changes in its paid
time off program, partially offsetting these increases.
Capital expenditures
are expected to range from $150 million to $175 million in 2010. Projected
investments include continued investments in distribution centers, information
technology, and the normal recurring replacement of equipment. Grainger expects
to fund 2010 capital investments from operating cash flows.
Matters
Affecting Comparability. There
were 255 sales days in 2009 and 2007, compared to 256 sales days in
2008.
Grainger completed
several acquisitions throughout 2008 and 2009, all of which were immaterial
individually, and in the aggregate. Grainger’s operating results have
included the results of each business acquired since the respective acquisition
date.
Effective January 1,
2009, Grainger revised its segment disclosure. Prior year amounts
have been restated in a consistent manner.
Results
of Operations
The
following table is included as an aid to understanding changes in Grainger’s
Consolidated Statements of Earnings:
|
|
|
For the Years
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
As a Percent
of Net Sales
|
|
|
Percent
Increase/(Decrease) from Prior Year
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Net
sales
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
(9.2 |
)% |
|
|
6.7 |
% |
|
Cost of
merchandise sold
|
|
|
58.2 |
|
|
|
59.0 |
|
|
|
59.4 |
|
|
|
(10.4 |
) |
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
Gross
profit
|
|
|
41.8 |
|
|
|
41.0 |
|
|
|
40.6 |
|
|
|
(7.5 |
) |
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
Operating
expenses
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
|
29.6 |
|
|
|
30.1 |
|
|
|
(4.6 |
) |
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
Operating
earnings
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
(15.0 |
) |
|
|
16.7 |
|
|
Other income
(expense)
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
(545.5 |
) |
|
|
(184.3 |
) |
|
Income
taxes
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
(7.2 |
) |
|
|
13.8 |
|
|
Noncontrolling
interest
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
Net
earnings attributable to W.W. Grainger,
Inc.
|
|
|
6.9 |
% |
|
|
6.9 |
% |
|
|
6.6 |
% |
|
|
(9.4 |
)% |
|
|
13.1 |
% |
2009
Compared to 2008
Grainger’s net sales
of $6,222.0 million for 2009 decreased 9.2% when compared with net sales of
$6,850.0 million for 2008. There was one less selling day in 2009 versus 2008.
Daily sales were down 8.8%. Sales were negatively affected by a
decline in volume of approximately 14 percentage points, partially offset by
price increases of approximately 5 percentage points. In addition,
sales were negatively affected by 1 percentage point due to foreign exchange,
while sales from acquisitions contributed approximately 1 percentage
point. The overall decrease in net sales was led by a mid 20 percent
decline in the heavy manufacturing customer sector, followed by a low 20 percent
decline in the reseller customer sector and a mid-teen percent decline in the
contractor customer sector. The government customer sector performed
the strongest as sales were flat for 2009, followed by a mid single-digit
decline in the commercial customer sector. Refer to the Segment
Analysis below for further details.
Gross profit of
$2,598.5 million for 2009 decreased 7.5%. The gross profit margin for
2009 increased 0.8 percentage point to 41.8% from 41.0% in 2008. The
improvement in the gross profit margin was primarily driven by price increases
exceeding product cost increases, partially offset by an increase in the mix of
sales to large customers which are generally at lower margins.
Operating expenses
of $1,933.3 million for 2009 decreased 4.6% from $2,025.6 million for 2008.
Operating expenses decreased primarily due to lower payroll and benefits as a
result of lower headcount, profit sharing and incentive
compensation. Non-payroll related expenses also decreased due to cost
containment efforts.
Operating earnings
of $665.2 million for 2009 decreased 15.0% from $782.7 million for
2008. The decrease in operating earnings was primarily due to the
decline in sales combined with operating expenses, which declined at a lower
rate than sales. These declines were partially offset by an increase in gross
profit margin.
Net
earnings for 2009 decreased by 9.4% to $430.5 million from $475.4 million
in 2008. The decline in net earnings for 2009 primarily resulted from the
decline in operating earnings, partially offset by the one-time noncash pre-tax
gain of $47.4 million ($28 million after tax) from the step-up of the investment
in MonotaRO after Grainger became a majority owner in September
2009. Diluted earnings per share of $5.62 in 2009 were 5.9% lower
than $5.97 for 2008, primarily due to the decline in net earnings, partially
offset by lower shares outstanding. In the first quarter of 2009,
Grainger adopted authoritative guidance regarding “Determining Whether
Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating
Securities,” resulting in a seven cent reduction to the previously reported 2008
diluted earnings per share.
Segment
Analysis
The
following comments at the segment and business unit level include external and
intersegment net sales and operating earnings. See Note 18 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements.
United
States
Net
sales were $5,445.4 million for 2009, a decrease of $612.4 million, or 10.1%,
when compared with net sales of $6,057.8 million for 2008. Daily
sales in the United States were down 9.8%. All customer sectors were
negatively impacted by economic conditions. The overall decrease in
net sales was led by a mid 20 percent decline in the heavy manufacturing
customer sector and in the reseller customer sector. The contractor
and light manufacturing customer sectors declined in the mid-teens and high
single digits, respectively, while the government customer sector
performed the
strongest with flat sales for 2009. Due to the impact of acquisitions
made in 2009, favorable foreign exchange rates and organic growth, sales are
expected to improve in 2010.
Beginning in 2006,
Grainger has added approximately 234,000 new products to supplement the
plumbing, fastener, material handling and security product lines as part of the
business’ ongoing product line expansion initiative. The most recent catalog,
issued in February 2010, offers a total of 307,000 products, an increase of
70,000 products over the 2009 catalog.
The
segment gross profit margin increased 1.3 percentage points in 2009 over
2008. The improvement in gross profit margin was primarily driven by
price increases exceeding product cost increases, partially offset by an
increase in the mix of lower margin sales to large customers.
Operating expenses
in this segment were down 4.6% for 2009. Operating expenses decreased
primarily due to lower payroll and benefits as a result of reduced headcount,
lower profit sharing and no incentive compensation, partially offset by an
increase in severance costs. Non-payroll related expenses also
decreased due to cost containment efforts.
For
the segment, operating earnings of $735.6 million for 2009 decreased 12.5% over
$840.4 million for 2008. This decrease in operating earnings for
2009 was primarily due to the decline in net sales and operating expenses which
declined at a lower rate than sales, partially offset by an increase in gross
profit margin.
Canada
Net
sales were $651.2 million for 2009, a decrease of $76.8 million, or 10.6%, when
compared with $728.0 million for 2008. Daily sales were down 10.2%
and in local currency, daily sales decreased 3.9% for 2009. The
decrease in net sales was led by declines in the heavy manufacturing and
contractor customer sectors driven by economic conditions. Partially
offsetting these declines were strong sales to the utilities customer sector
driven by special projects, and to higher sales to the government.
The
gross profit margin decreased 1.1 percentage points in 2009 over
2008. The decline in the gross profit margin was primarily due to
cost increases exceeding price increases and an increase in the mix of lower
margin sales, particularly to large customers.
Operating expenses
decreased 11.5% in 2009. In local currency, operating expenses
decreased 5.6% primarily due to lower commissions and incentive compensation
accruals, and non-payroll related expenses including lower travel and
advertising costs. In addition, 2008 included expenses related to the
bankruptcy of a provider of freight payment services.
Operating earnings
of $43.7 million for 2009 were down $10.5 million, or 19.4% for 2009. In local
currency, operating earnings decreased 15.6% primarily due to the decline in net
sales and gross profit margin.
Other
Businesses
Net
sales for other businesses, which include Japan, Mexico, India, Puerto Rico,
China and Panama, were up 47.7% for 2009. Daily sales increased
48.3%. The increase in net sales was due primarily to the inclusion
of results from the acquisitions of the businesses in India and Japan, along
with a positive contribution from China. Operating losses for other businesses
were $11.6 million for 2009, a 1.6% improvement compared to operating losses of
$11.8 million for 2008.
Other
Income and Expense
Other income and
expense was $42.1 million of income in 2009, an increase of $51.6 million as
compared with $9.5 million of expense in 2008. The following table
summarizes the components of other income and expense (in thousands of
dollars):
|
|
|
For the Years
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Other income
and (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
income (expense) – net
|
|
$ |
(7,408 |
) |
|
$ |
(9,416 |
) |
|
Equity in net
income of unconsolidated entities
|
|
|
1,497 |
|
|
|
3,642 |
|
|
Gain
(write-off) of investment in unconsolidated entities
|
|
|
47,343 |
|
|
|
(6,031 |
) |
|
Other
non-operating income
|
|
|
964 |
|
|
|
2,668 |
|
|
Other
non-operating expense
|
|
|
(283 |
) |
|
|
(317 |
) |
|
|
|
$ |
42,113 |
|
|
$ |
(9,454 |
) |
The
change from net expense to net income was primarily attributable to the one-time
noncash gain of $47.4 million from the step-up of the investment in MonotaRO
after Grainger became a majority owner in September 2009. In
addition, 2008 included the write-off of a joint venture investment in India as
described in Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Other operating
income is lower primarily due to lower foreign currency transactions gains
versus 2008.
Income
Taxes
Income taxes of
$276.6 million in 2009 decreased 7.2% as compared with $297.9 million in
2008. Grainger’s effective tax rates were 39.1% and 38.5% in 2009 and
2008, respectively. The increase in the tax rate in 2009 was primarily driven by
increased U.S. state tax rates.
For
2010, Grainger is projecting its estimated effective tax rate to be
approximately 39.3%. The increase is primarily due to current
estimates of the U.S. state tax rates and unfavorable impacts of non-U.S. tax
jurisdictions.
2008
Compared to 2007
Grainger’s net sales
of $6,850.0 million for 2008 increased 6.7% when compared with net sales of
$6,418.0 million for 2007. There was one more selling day in 2008 versus 2007.
Daily sales were up 6.3%. The increase in net sales was led by high single-digit
sales growth in the government sector, and mid single-digit sales growth in the
commercial and reseller sectors. Approximately 1 percentage point of the sales
growth came from Grainger’s product line expansion initiative and approximately
5 percentage points came from price and volume. Refer to the Segment
Analysis below for further detail of Grainger’s ongoing strategic
initiatives.
The
gross profit margin for 2008 improved 0.4 percentage point to 41.0% from 40.6%
in 2007. The improvement in the gross profit margin was primarily driven by
price increases exceeding cost increases, partially offset by an increase in the
mix of sales to large customers which are generally at lower
margins.
Operating earnings
of $782.7 million for 2008 increased 16.7% over the $670.7 million for
2007. This earnings improvement exceeded the sales growth rate due to an
improved gross profit margin and positive operating expense
leverage.
Net
earnings for 2008 increased by 13.1% to $475.4 million from $420.1 million
in 2007. The growth in net earnings for 2008 primarily resulted from the
improvement in operating earnings, partially offset by lower interest income,
higher interest expense and the write-off of Grainger’s $6.0 million investment
in Grainger Industrial Supply India Private Limited, formerly known as Asia
Pacific Brands India Private Limited. Diluted earnings per share of $5.97 in
2008 were 21.6% higher than the $4.91 for 2007. This improvement was higher than
the percentage increase for net earnings due to the effect of Grainger’s share
repurchase program.
Segment
Analysis
The
following comments at the segment and business unit level include external and
intersegment net sales and operating earnings. See Note 18 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements.
United
States
Net
sales were $6,057.8 million for 2008, an increase of $328.5 million, or 5.7%,
when compared with net sales of $5,729.3 million for 2007. Daily sales were up
5.3%. Sales were led by high single-digit sales growth in the government sector,
and mid single-digit sales growth in the commercial and reseller sectors.
Approximately 2 percentage points of the sales growth came from the product
line expansion initiative and approximately 4 percentage points came from price
and volume. Sales volume was negatively affected by approximately
1 percentage point due to a decline in sales of seasonal
products.
In
2004, a multiyear market expansion program was launched to strengthen Grainger’s
presence in top metropolitan markets and better position it to serve local
customers. The market expansion program was completed in 2008,
however, the benefits realized from this initiative are expected to
continue.
Consistent with the
overall downturn in the economy, beginning in October most of these markets saw
negative sales growth, which significantly affected sales growth for 2008.
Results for the market expansion program were as follows:
|
|
|
Daily Sales
Increase
2008 vs.
2007
|
|
|
Phase 1
(Atlanta, Denver, Seattle)
|
|
7%
|
|
|
Phase 2 (Four
markets in Southern California)
|
|
5%
|
|
|
Phase 3
(Houston, St. Louis, Tampa)
|
|
10%
|
|
|
Phase 4
(Baltimore, Cincinnati, Kansas City, Miami,
Philadelphia, Washington, D.C.)
|
|
2%
|
|
|
Phase 5
(Dallas, Detroit, New York, Phoenix)
|
|
3%
|
|
|
Phase 6
(Chicago, Minneapolis, Pittsburgh, San
Francisco)
|
|
6%
|
|
Over the
past three years, over 150,000 new products have been added to supplement the
plumbing, fastener, material handling and security product lines as part of the
business’ ongoing product line expansion initiative. The catalog, issued in
2009, offered a total of 237,000 products, an increase of 50,000 products over
the 2008 catalog.
The
segment gross profit margin increased 0.4 percentage point in 2008 over 2007,
driven primarily by price increases exceeding cost increases, partially offset
by an increase in the mix of lower margin sales to large customers.
Operating expenses
in this segment were up 3.3% in 2008. Expenses grew at a slower rate than sales
primarily due to lower advertising expenses, incentive compensation, severance
and lower bad debt expense, the result of improved collection
efficiency.
For
the segment, operating earnings of $840.4 million for 2008 increased 14.9% over
the $731.6 million for 2007. This earnings improvement exceeded the sales
growth rate due to an improved gross profit margin and positive operating
expense leverage.
Canada
Net
sales were $728.0 million for 2008, an increase of $91.5 million, or 14.4%, when
compared with $636.5 million for 2007. Daily sales were up 13.9%. In local
currency, daily sales increased 13.1%. The increase was led by sales growth in
the contractor, agriculture and mining and government sectors. Macro
economic factors such as higher commodity prices for oil, gas and mineral
products drove a significant portion of this growth due to an increase in
customer demand in these sectors. Sales to new customers and
increased sales penetration to existing customers was also a contributing factor
to these increases.
The
gross profit margin increased 0.3 percentage points in 2008 over 2007. The
improvement in the gross profit margin was primarily due to price increases
exceeding cost increases.
Operating expenses
were up 13.7% in 2008. The increase in operating expenses was primarily due to
payroll and benefits as a result of increased headcount, merit increases and
commissions, and higher advertising and occupancy expenses, and expenses related
to the bankruptcy of a provider of freight payment services.
Operating earnings
of $54.3 million for 2008 were up $10.0 million, or 22.7%. This earnings
improvement exceeded the sales growth rate due to an improved gross profit
margin and operating expenses that grew at a slower rate than
sales.
Other
Businesses
Net
sales for other businesses, which include Mexico, Puerto Rico, China and Panama,
were up 19.5% for 2008. Daily sales increased 19.0%. The increase in
net sales was due primarily to Mexico as sales increased 11.9% in 2008 versus
2007. Daily sales were up 11.5%. In local currency, daily sales were
up 12.7%, driven primarily by increased market share coming from the ongoing
branch expansion program. Operating losses for other businesses were $11.8
million for 2008, a 57.8% increase over operating losses of $7.5 million for
2007.
Other
Income and Expense
Other income and
expense was $9.5 million of expense in 2008, compared with $11.2 million of
income in 2007. The following table summarizes the components of other income
and expense (in thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
For the Years
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Other income
and (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
income (expense) – net
|
|
$ |
(9,416 |
) |
|
$ |
9,151 |
|
|
Equity in net
income of unconsolidated entities
|
|
|
3,642 |
|
|
|
2,016 |
|
|
Write-off of
investment in unconsolidated entity
|
|
|
(6,031 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
|
Other
non-operating income
|
|
|
2,668 |
|
|
|
404 |
|
|
Other
non-operating expense
|
|
|
(317 |
) |
|
|
(363 |
) |
|
|
|
$ |
(9,454 |
) |
|
$ |
11,208 |
|
The
change from net interest income to net interest expense was primarily
attributable to the four-year bank term loan obtained in May 2008. The write-off
of the investment relates to Grainger Industrial Supply India Private Limited,
formerly known as Asia Pacific Brands India Private Limited as described in Note
6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Other non-operating income increased
primarily due to higher foreign exchange transaction gains.
Income
Taxes
Income taxes of
$297.9 million in 2008 increased 13.8% as compared with $261.7 million in 2007.
Grainger’s effective tax rates were 38.5% and 38.4% in 2008 and 2007,
respectively.
Financial
Condition
Grainger expects its
strong working capital position, cash flows from operations and borrowing
capacity to continue, allowing it to fund its operations, including growth
initiatives, capital expenditures, acquisitions and repurchase of shares, as
well as pay cash dividends.
Cash
Flow
Net
cash flows from operations of $732.4 million in 2009, $530.1 million in 2008 and
$468.9 million in 2007 continued to improve Grainger’s financial position and
serve as the primary source of funding. Contributing to cash flows from
operations were net earnings for 2009 of $430.8 million and the effect of
noncash expenses such as stock-based compensation, depreciation and
amortization, partially offset by the noncash pre-tax gain of $47.3 million from
unconsolidated entities after Grainger became a majority owner. Also
contributing to net cash provided by operating activities were changes in
operating assets and liabilities, which resulted in a net source of cash of
$121.8 million for 2009. The principal operating source of cash was a
decrease in inventory due to lower purchases. Other
current liabilities declined primarily due to reduced profit sharing and
incentive compensation accruals.
Net
cash provided by operations increased $61.2 million in 2008 over 2007, driven
primarily by increased net earnings. The Change in operating assets and
liabilities – net of business acquisitions reduced cash by $143.1 million in
2008. This use of cash was driven primarily by an increase in inventory due to
the product line expansion initiative.
Net
cash flows used in investing activities were $262.6 million, $202.6 million and
$197.0 million in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Cash expended for property,
buildings, equipment and capitalized software was $142.4 million, $195.0 million
and $197.4 million in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Additional information
regarding capital spending is detailed in the Capital
Expenditures section below. In 2009, Grainger funded infrastructure
improvement projects in the distribution centers in the United States, Canada
and Mexico, and paid $121.8 million for business acquisitions and other
investments, net of cash received. In 2008, Grainger continued to fund the
Company’s market expansion initiative.
Net
cash flows used in financing activities for 2009, 2008 and 2007 were $413.5
million, $36.8 million and $513.9 million, respectively. Proceeds from the
four-year bank term loan of $500 million were included in
2008. Treasury stock purchases were $372.7 million in 2009 as
Grainger repurchased 4.5 million shares compared to purchases of $394.2 million
in 2008 to repurchase 5.5 million shares. As of December 31, 2009, approximately
3.1 million shares of common stock remained available under Grainger’s
repurchase authorization. Dividends paid to shareholders were $134.7 million in
2009 versus $121.5 million in 2008. Grainger also used cash in financing
activities to repay $18.9 million of long-term debt borrowings in 2009 and $81.4
million to repay short-term borrowings in 2008. In 2007, treasury stock
purchases were $647.3 million for 7.2 million shares and dividends paid to
shareholders were $113.1 million.
Working
Capital
Internally generated
funds have been the primary source of working capital and of funds used in
business expansion, supplemented by debt as circumstances dictated. In addition,
funds were expended for facilities optimization and enhancements to support
growth initiatives, as well as for business and systems development and other
infrastructure improvements.
Working capital was
$1,354.7 million at December 31, 2009, compared with $1,382.4 million at
December 31, 2008 and $974.4 million at December 31, 2007. At these dates, the
ratio of current assets to current liabilities was 2.7, 2.8 and 2.2. Working
capital and the current ratio were essentially flat in 2009 compared to
2008. The increase in the current ratio and working capital from 2007
to 2008 primarily related to increases in cash and inventories and the
replacement of short-term borrowings with long-term borrowings.
Capital
Expenditures
In each of the past
three years, a portion of operating cash flow has been used for additions to
property, buildings, equipment and capitalized software as summarized in the
following table (in thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
For the Years
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Land,
buildings, structures and improvements
|
|
$ |
67,917 |
|
|
$ |
107,688 |
|
|
$ |
100,380 |
|
|
Furniture,
fixtures, machinery and equipment
|
|
|
63,667 |
|
|
|
76,163 |
|
|
|
87,389 |
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
131,584 |
|
|
|
183,851 |
|
|
|
187,769 |
|
|
Capitalized
software
|
|
|
8,367 |
|
|
|
12,297 |
|
|
|
8,556 |
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
139,951 |
|
|
$ |
196,148 |
|
|
$ |
196,325 |
|
In 2009, significant
capital expenditures included investments in the United States distribution
center network. In addition, there was continued investment in Canada
and other international branches and distribution centers, as well as the normal
recurring replacement of equipment.
In
2008, Grainger substantially completed its investments in the market expansion
program in the United States which realigned branches in the top 25 major
metropolitan areas. In addition, there was continued international investment,
including branch expansion in Mexico, as well as the normal recurring
replacement of equipment.
In
2007, Grainger’s investments included the market expansion program, Mexico and
China expansion and the normal recurring replacement of equipment.
Capital expenditures
are expected to range from $150 million to $175 million in 2010. Projected
investments include continued investments in distribution centers, information
technology, and the normal recurring replacement of equipment. Grainger expects
to fund 2010 capital investments from operating cash flows.
Debt
Grainger maintains a
debt ratio and liquidity position that provides flexibility in funding working
capital needs and long-term cash requirements. In addition to internally
generated funds, Grainger has various sources of financing available, including
bank borrowings under lines of credit. A four-year bank term loan of $500
million was obtained in May 2008. Proceeds were used to pay down short-term debt
and for general corporate purposes. At December 31, 2009, Grainger’s long-term
debt rating by Standard & Poor’s was AA+. Grainger’s available lines of
credit, as further discussed in Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements,
were $250.0 million at December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Total
debt as a percent of total capitalization was 19.1%, 20.7% and 5.0% as of the
same dates. The increase in total debt as a percent of total capitalization in
2008 was primarily the result of the $500 million bank term loan. Grainger
believes any circumstances that would trigger early payment or acceleration with
respect to any outstanding debt securities would not have a material impact on
its results of operations or financial position.
Commitments
and Other Contractual Obligations
At
December 31, 2009, Grainger’s contractual obligations, including estimated
payments due by period, are as follows (in thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
Payments Due
by Period
|
|
|
|
|
Total Amounts
Committed
|
|
|
Less than 1
Year
|
|
|
1 – 3
Years
|
|
|
4 – 5
Years
|
|
|
More than 5
Years
|
|
|
Long-term
debt obligations
|
|
$ |
490,628 |
|
|
$ |
53,128 |
|
|
$ |
437,500 |
|
|
$ |
– |
|
|
$ |
– |
|
|
Interest on
long-term debt
|
|
|
10,214 |
|
|
|
4,668 |
|
|
|
5,453 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
Operating
lease obligations
|
|
|
216,924 |
|
|
|
42,832 |
|
|
|
69,741 |
|
|
|
52,900 |
|
|
|
51,451 |
|
|
Purchase
obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Uncompleted additions
to
property, buildings and
equipment
|
|
|
42,025 |
|
|
|
24,215 |
|
|
|
17,810 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
Commitments to purchase
inventory
|
|
|
212,700 |
|
|
|
212,694 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
Other purchase
obligations
|
|
|
135,694 |
|
|
|
64,836 |
|
|
|
35,659 |
|
|
|
31,146 |
|
|
|
4,053 |
|
|
Other
liabilities
|
|
|
191,346 |
|
|
|
10,726 |
|
|
|
17,264 |
|
|
|
20,343 |
|
|
|
143,013 |
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
1,299,531 |
|
|
$ |
413,099 |
|
|
$ |
583,433 |
|
|
$ |
104,482 |
|
|
$ |
198,517 |
|
Purchase obligations
for inventory are made in the normal course of business to meet operating needs.
While purchase orders for both inventory purchases and noninventory purchases
are generally cancelable without penalty, certain vendor agreements provide for
cancellation fees or penalties depending on the terms of the
contract.
Other liabilities
represent future benefit payments for postretirement benefit plans and
postemployment disability medical benefits as determined by actuarial
projections. Other employment-related benefits costs of $39.1 million have not
been included in this table as the timing of benefit payments is not
statistically predictable. See Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements.
See
also Notes 9 and 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further detail
related to the interest on long-term debt and operating lease obligations,
respectively.
Grainger has
recorded a noncurrent liability of $27.9 million for tax uncertainties and
interest at December 31, 2009. This amount is excluded from the table above, as
Grainger cannot make reliable estimates of these cash flows by period. See Note
16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
Grainger does not
have any material exposures to off-balance sheet
arrangements. Grainger does not have any variable interest entities
or activities that include non-exchange-traded contracts accounted for at fair
value.
Critical
Accounting Estimates
The
preparation of financial statements, in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America, requires management to make
judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets,
liabilities, revenues and expenses in the financial statements. Management bases
its estimates on historical experience and other assumptions, which it believes
are reasonable. If actual amounts are ultimately different from these estimates,
the revisions are included in Grainger’s results of operations for the period in
which the actual amounts become known.
Accounting policies
are considered critical when they require management to make assumptions about
matters that are highly uncertain at the time the estimates are made and when
there are different estimates that management reasonably could have made, which
would have a material impact on the presentation of Grainger’s financial
condition, changes in financial condition or results of operations.
Note 2 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements describes the significant accounting policies
used in the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements. The most
significant areas involving management judgments and estimates follow. Actual
results in these areas could differ materially from management’s estimates under
different assumptions or conditions.
Allowance
for Doubtful Accounts. Grainger uses several factors to
estimate the allowance for uncollectible accounts receivable including the age
of the receivables and the historical ratio of actual write-offs to the age of
the receivables. The analyses performed also take into consideration economic
conditions that may have an impact on a specific industry, group of customers or
a specific customer. Write-offs could be materially different than the reserves
provided if economic conditions change or actual results deviate from historical
trends.
Inventory
Reserves. Grainger
establishes inventory reserves for shrinkage and excess and obsolete inventory.
Provisions for inventory shrinkage are based on historical experience to account
for unmeasured usage or loss. Actual inventory shrinkage could be materially
different from these estimates, affecting Grainger’s inventory values and cost
of merchandise sold.
Grainger regularly
reviews inventory to evaluate continued demand and identify any obsolete or
excess quantities of inventory. Grainger records provisions for the difference
between excess and obsolete inventory and its estimated realizable value.
Estimated realizable value is based on anticipated future product demand, market
conditions and liquidation values. Actual results differing from these
projections could have a material effect on Grainger’s results of
operations.
Goodwill
and Indefinite Lived Intangible Assets. Grainger’s
business acquisitions typically result in the recording of goodwill and other
intangible assets, which affect the amount of amortization expense and possibly
impairment write-downs that Grainger may incur in future periods. Grainger
annually reviews goodwill and intangible assets that have indefinite lives for
impairment and when events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying
value of these assets might exceed their current fair values. Grainger
determines fair value using an income approach, in conjunction with relevant
market information which requires certain assumptions and estimates regarding
future profitability of acquired businesses. Grainger believes that it does not
have a material amount of goodwill at risk of failing the goodwill impairment
test; however, due to the inherent uncertainties associated with these factors
and market conditions, impairment charges could occur in future
periods.
Stock
Incentive Plans. Grainger
maintains stock incentive plans under which a variety of incentive grants may be
awarded to employees and directors. Grainger uses a binomial lattice option
pricing model to estimate the value of stock option grants. The model requires
projections of the risk-free interest rate, expected life, volatility, expected
dividend yield and forfeiture rate of the stock option grants. The fair value of
options granted in 2009, 2008 and 2007 used the following
assumptions:
|
|
|
For the years
ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Risk-free
interest rate
|
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
|
4.6 |
% |
|
Expected
life
|
|
6
years
|
|
|
6
years
|
|
|
6
years
|
|
|
Expected
volatility
|
|
|
28.8 |
% |
|
|
25.2 |
% |
|
|
24.3 |
% |
|
Expected
dividend yield
|
|
|
2.3 |
% |
|
|
1.8 |
% |
|
|
1.7 |
% |
The
risk-free interest rate is selected based on yields from U.S. Treasury
zero-coupon issues with a remaining term approximately equal to the expected
term of the options being valued. The expected life selected for options granted
during each year presented represents the period of time that the options are
expected to be outstanding based on historical data of option holders’ exercise
and termination behavior. Expected volatility is based upon implied and
historical volatility of the closing price of Grainger’s stock over a period
equal to the expected life of each option grant. The dividend yield assumption
is based on history and expectation of dividend payouts. Because stock option
compensation expense is based on awards ultimately expected to vest, it has been
reduced for estimated forfeitures, using historical forfeiture
experience.
The
amount of stock option compensation expense is significantly affected by the
valuation model and these assumptions. If a different valuation model or
different assumptions were used, the stock option compensation expense could be
significantly different from what is recorded in the current
period.
Compensation expense
for other stock-based awards is based upon the closing market price on the last
trading date preceding the date of the grant.
For
additional information concerning stock incentive plans, see Note 12 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements.
Postretirement
Healthcare Benefits. Postretirement
healthcare obligations and net periodic costs are dependent on assumptions and
estimates used in calculating such amounts. The assumptions used
include, among others, discount rates, assumed rates of return on plan assets
and healthcare cost trend rates and certain employee related factors, such as
turnover, retirement age and mortality rates. Changes in these and other
assumptions (caused by conditions in equity markets or plan experience, for
example) could have a material effect on Grainger’s postretirement benefit
obligations and expense, and could affect its results of operations and
financial condition. These changes in assumptions may also affect voluntary
decisions to make additional contributions to the trust established for funding
the postretirement benefit obligation.
The
discount rate assumptions used by management reflect the rates available on
high-quality fixed income debt instruments as of December 31, the measurement
date, of each year. A higher discount rate decreases the present value of
benefit obligations and net periodic postretirement benefit costs. As of
December 31, 2009, Grainger increased the discount rate used in the calculation
of its
postretirement plan obligation from 5.9% to 6.0% to reflect the increase in
market interest rates. Grainger estimates that this increase in the discount
rate will increase 2010 pretax earnings by approximately $0.6 million, although
other changes in assumptions may increase, decrease or eliminate this
effect.
Grainger considers
the long-term historical actual return on plan assets and the historical
performance of the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index in developing its expected
long-term return on plan assets. In 2009, Grainger maintained the expected
long-term rate of return on plan assets of 6.0% (net of tax at 40%) based on the
historical average of long-term rates of return.
A 1
percentage point change in assumed healthcare cost trend rates would have had
the following effects on December 31, 2009 results (in thousands of
dollars):
|
|
|
1 Percentage
Point
|
|
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
Effect on
total of service and interest cost
|
|
$ |
5,278 |
|
|
$ |
(4,100 |
) |
|
Effect on
accumulated postretirement benefit obligation
|
|
|
44,290 |
|
|
|
(34,925 |
) |
In
2009, Grainger changed the mortality table used in the postretirement valuation
from RP2000 to the IRS 2008 Fully Generational Mortality Table which builds in
future increases in healthcare rates and expenses due to improved mortality
rates. This change resulted in a $13.9 million increase of the
postretirement healthcare obligation as of December 31, 2009, and is estimated
to decrease 2010 pretax earnings by approximately $2.5 million. Other
changes in assumptions may increase, decrease or eliminate this
effect.
Grainger may
terminate or modify the postretirement plan at any time, subject to the
provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and
the Internal Revenue Code, as amended. In the event the postretirement plan is
terminated, all assets of the Group Benefit Trust inure to the benefit of the
participants. The foregoing assumptions are based on the presumption that the
postretirement plan will continue. Were the postretirement plan to terminate,
different actuarial assumptions and other factors might be
applicable.
Grainger has used
its best judgment in making assumptions and estimates and believes such
assumptions and estimates used are appropriate. Changes to the assumptions may
be required in future years as a result of actual experience or new trends and,
therefore, may affect Grainger’s retirement plan obligations and future
expense.
For
additional information concerning postretirement healthcare benefits, see Note
10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Insurance
Reserves. Grainger
retains a significant portion of the risk of certain losses related to workers’
compensation, general liability and property losses through the utilization of
high deductibles and self-insured retentions. There are also certain other risk
areas for which Grainger does not maintain insurance.
Grainger is
responsible for establishing accounting policies on insurance reserves. Although
it relies on outside parties to project future claims costs, it retains control
over actuarial assumptions, including loss development factors and claim payment
patterns. Grainger performs ongoing reviews of its insured and uninsured risks,
which it uses to establish the appropriate reserve levels.
The
use of assumptions in the analysis leads to fluctuations in required reserves
over time. Any change in the required reserve balance is reflected in the
current period’s results of operations.
Income
Taxes. Grainger
recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax
consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or
tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are
determined based on the differences between the financial reporting and tax
bases of assets and liabilities, using enacted tax rates in effect for the year
in which the differences are expected to reverse. The tax balances and income
tax expense recognized by Grainger are based on management’s interpretations of
the tax laws of multiple jurisdictions. Income tax expense reflects Grainger’s
best estimates and assumptions regarding, among other items, the level of future
taxable income, interpretation of tax laws and tax planning opportunities and
uncertain tax positions. Future rulings by tax authorities and future changes in
tax laws and their interpretation, changes in projected levels of taxable income
and future tax planning strategies could impact the actual effective tax rate
and tax balances recorded by Grainger.
Other.
Other
significant accounting policies, not involving the same level of measurement
uncertainties as those discussed above, are nevertheless important to an
understanding of the financial statements. Policies such as revenue recognition,
depreciation, intangibles, long-lived assets and warranties require judgments on
complex matters that are often subject to multiple external sources of
authoritative guidance such as the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
and the Securities and Exchange Commission. Possible changes in estimates or
assumptions associated with these policies are not expected to have a material
effect on the financial condition or results of operations of Grainger. More
information on these additional accounting policies can be found in Note 2 to
the Consolidated Financial Statements.
New
Accounting Standards
The
following new accounting standards exclude those pronouncements that are
unlikely to have an effect on Grainger upon adoption.
In
December 2008, the FASB issued authoritative guidance regarding employer’s
disclosures about postretirement benefit plan assets, codified primarily in ASC
715. ASC 715 requires expanded disclosures about investment policies
and strategies for the plan assets of a defined benefit pension or other
postretirement plan, including information regarding major categories of assets,
input and valuation techniques used to measure the fair value of plan assets and
significant concentrations of risk within the plans. The Company has
applied the provision of ASC 715 and the adoption did not have a material effect
on the Company’s results of operations or financial position.
In
June 2009, the FASB issued “The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the
Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles,” codified in ASC 105,
which established the FASB Accounting Standards Codification as the source of
authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles to be applied by
non-governmental entities. The Accounting Standards Codification
superseded all existing non-SEC accounting and reporting
standards. ASC 105 was effective for interim or annual financial
periods ending after September 15, 2009. The Company has applied this
statement and the adoption did not have a material effect on its results of
operations or financial position.
Inflation
Inflation during the
last three years has not had a significant effect on operations. The predominant
use of the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method of accounting for inventories and
accelerated depreciation methods for financial reporting and income tax purposes
result in a substantial recognition of the effects of inflation in the financial
statements.
Some of Grainger’s
products contain significant amounts of commodity-priced materials, such as
steel, copper or oil, and are subject to price changes based upon fluctuations
in the commodities market. Grainger has been able to successfully pass on cost
increases to its customers minimizing the effect of inflation on results of
operations.
Grainger believes
the most positive means to combat inflation and advance the interests of
investors lie in the continued application of basic business principles, which
include improving productivity, maintaining working capital turnover and
offering products and services which can command appropriate prices in the
marketplace.
Forward-Looking
Statements
This Form 10-K
contains statements that are not historical in nature but concern future results
and business plans, strategies and objectives and other matters that may be
deemed to be “forward-looking statements” under the federal securities laws.
Grainger has generally identified such forward-looking statements by using words
such as “anticipate, anticipated, assumed, assumes, assumption, assumptions,
believe, believes, continue, continued, continues, continues to believe it
complies, could, estimate, estimated, estimates, expectation, expected, expects,
forecast, forecasts, had potentially, intended, intends, likely, may, might,
plans, predict, predictable, presumption, project, projected, projecting,
projection, projections, potential, reasonably likely, scheduled, should,
tended, timing and outcome are uncertain, unanticipated, unlikely, will, will be
realized, and would” or similar expressions.
Grainger cannot
guarantee that any forward-looking statement will be realized, although Grainger
does believe that its assumptions underlying its forward-looking statements are
reasonable. Achievement of future results is subject to risks and uncertainties
which could cause Grainger’s results to differ materially from those which are
presented.
Factors that could
cause actual results to differ materially from those presented or implied in a
forward-looking statement include, without limitation: higher product
costs or other expenses; a major loss of customers; loss or disruption of source
of supply; increased competitive pricing pressures; failure to develop or
implement new technologies or business strategies; the outcome of pending and
future litigation or governmental or regulatory proceedings; investigations,
inquiries, audits and changes in laws and regulations; disruption of information
technology or data security systems; general industry or market conditions;
general global economic conditions; currency exchange rate fluctuations; market
volatility; commodity price volatility; labor shortages; facilities disruptions
or shutdowns; higher fuel costs or disruptions in transportation services;
natural and other catastrophes; unanticipated weather conditions; and the
factors identified in Item 1A, Risk Factors.
Caution should be
taken not to place undue reliance on Grainger’s forward-looking statements and
Grainger undertakes no obligation to publicly update the forward-looking
statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or
otherwise.
Item
7A: Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk
Grainger is exposed
to foreign currency exchange risk related to its transactions, assets and
liabilities denominated in foreign currencies. For 2009, a uniform
10% strengthening of the U.S. dollar relative to foreign currencies that affect
Grainger and its joint ventures would have resulted in a $0.9 million decrease
in net earnings. Comparatively, in 2008 a uniform 10% strengthening of the U.S.
dollar relative to foreign currencies that affect Grainger and its joint
ventures would have resulted in a $2.6 million decrease in net earnings. A
uniform 10% weakening of the U.S. dollar would have resulted in a $1.1 million
increase in net earnings for 2009, as compared with an increase in net earnings
of $3.1 million for 2008. This sensitivity analysis of the effects of changes in
foreign currency exchange rates does not factor in potential changes in sales
levels or local currency prices or costs. Grainger does not hold derivatives for
trading purposes.
Grainger is also
exposed to interest rate risk in its debt portfolio. During 2009 and 2008, all
of its long-term debt was variable rate debt. A 1 percentage point increase in
interest rates paid by Grainger would have resulted in a decrease to net
earnings of approximately $3.3 million for 2009 and $2.5 million for
2008. A 1 percentage point decrease in interest rates would have
resulted in an increase to net earnings of approximately $3.3 million for 2009
and $2.5 million for 2008. This sensitivity analysis of the effects of changes
in interest rates on long-term debt does not factor in potential changes in
long-term debt levels.
Grainger has limited
primary exposure to commodity price risk on certain products for resale, but
does not purchase commodities directly.
Item
8: Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
The
financial statements and supplementary data are included on pages 27 to 62.
See the Index to Financial Statements and Supplementary Data on page
26.
Item
9: Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
None.
Item
9A: Controls and Procedures
Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
Grainger carried out
an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of its
management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial
Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of Grainger’s
disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15. Based
upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial
Officer concluded that Grainger’s disclosure controls and procedures were
effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.
Internal
Control Over Financial Reporting
|
(A)
|
Management’s
Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting
|
Management’s report
on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is included on page
27 of this Report under the heading Management’s Annual Report on Internal
Control Over Financial Reporting.
|
(B)
|
Attestation
Report of the Registered Public Accounting
Firm
|
The
report from Ernst & Young LLP on its audit of the effectiveness of
Grainger’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, is
included on page 28 of this Report under the heading Report of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm.
|
(C)
|
Changes in
Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting
|
There have been no
changes in Grainger’s internal control over financial reporting during the last
fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, Grainger’s internal control over financial
reporting.
Item
9B: Other Information
None.
PART
III
Item
10: Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate
Governance
The
information required by this item is incorporated by reference to Grainger’s
proxy statement relating to the annual meeting of shareholders to be held April
28, 2010, under the captions “Election of Directors,” “Board of Directors and
Board Committees” and “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance.”
Information required by this item regarding executive officers of Grainger is
set forth in Part I of this report under the caption “Executive
Officers.”
Grainger has adopted
a code of ethics that applies to the principal executive officer, principal
financial officer and principal accounting officer. This code of ethics is
incorporated into Grainger’s business conduct guidelines for directors, officers
and employees. Grainger intends to satisfy the disclosure requirement under Item
5.05 of Form 8-K relating to its code of ethics by posting such information on
its Web site at www.grainger.com/investor. A copy of the code of ethics
incorporated into Grainger’s business conduct guidelines is also available in
print without charge to any person upon request to Grainger’s Corporate
Secretary. Grainger has also adopted Operating Principles for the Board of
Directors, which are available on its Web site and are available in print to any
person who requests them.
Item
11: Executive Compensation
The
information required by this item is incorporated by reference to Grainger’s
proxy statement relating to the annual meeting of shareholders to be held April
28, 2010, under the captions “Board of Directors and Board Committees,”
“Director Compensation,” “Report of the Compensation Committee of the Board” and
“Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”
Item
12: Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
and Related Stockholder Matters
The
information required by this item is incorporated by reference to Grainger’s
proxy statement relating to the annual meeting of shareholders to be held April
28, 2010, under the captions “Ownership of Grainger Stock” and “Equity
Compensation Plans.”
Item
13: Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence
The
information required by this item is incorporated by reference to Grainger’s
proxy statement relating to the annual meeting of shareholders to be held April
28, 2010, under the captions "Election of Directors" and "Transactions with
Related Persons."
Item
14: Principal Accounting Fees and Services
The
information required by this item is incorporated by reference to Grainger’s
proxy statement relating to the annual meeting of shareholders to be held April
28, 2010, under the caption “Audit Fees and Audit Committee Pre-Approval
Policies and Procedures.”
PART
IV
Item
15: Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
|
(a)
|
|
Financial
Statements. See Index to Financial Statements and Supplementary
Data.
|
|
|
|
2.
3.
|
Financial
Statement Schedules. The schedules listed in Reg. 210.5-04 have been
omitted because they are either not applicable or the required information
is shown in the consolidated financial statements or notes
thereto.
Exhibits
|
|
(3)
|
(a)
(b)
|
Restated
Articles of Incorporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(i) to
Grainger’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
1998.
Bylaws, as
amended February 17, 2010.
|
|
|
(4)
|
Instruments
Defining the Rights of Security Holders, Including
Indentures
|
|
|
(a)
|
No instruments
which define the rights of holders of Grainger’s Industrial Development
Revenue Bonds are filed herewith, pursuant to the exemption contained in
Regulation S-K, Item 601(b)(4)(iii). Grainger hereby agrees to furnish to
the Securities and Exchange Commission, upon request, a copy of any such
instrument.
|
|
(a)
|
(i)
(ii)
|
Accelerated share
repurchase agreement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10 to
Grainger's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2007.
A Credit
Agreement with Wachovia Bank, National Association, as administrative
agent, and other lenders incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10 to
Grainger's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
2008.
|
|
|
(b)
|
Compensatory
Plans or Arrangements
|
|
|
(i)
|
Director Stock
Plan, as amended, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(c) to Grainger’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2006.
|
|
|
(ii)
|
1990 Long-Term
Stock Incentive Plan, as amended, incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10(a) to Grainger’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2006.
|
|
|
(iii)
|
2001 Long-Term
Stock Incentive Plan, as amended, incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10(b) to Grainger’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2006.
|
|
|
(iv)
|
Executive
Death Benefit Plan, as amended, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(v)
to Grainger's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2007.
|
|
|
(1)
|
First
amendment to the Executive Death Benefit Plan, incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10(b)(v)(1) to Grainger’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
(2)
|
Second
amendment to the Executive Death Benefit
Plan.
|
|
|
(v)
|
1985 Executive Deferred
Compensation Plan, as amended, incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10(d)(vii) to Grainger’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1998.
|
|
|
(vi)
|
Supplemental
Profit Sharing Plan, as amended, incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10(viii) to Grainger’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2003.
|
|
|
(vii)
|
Supplemental
Profit Sharing Plan II, as amended, incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10(ix) to Grainger's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2007.
|
|
|
(viii)
|
Form of Change
in Control Employment Agreement between Grainger and certain of its
executive officers, as amended, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(x)
to Grainger's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2007.
|
|
|
(ix)
|
Form of Change
in Control Employment Agreement between Grainger and certain of its
executive officers.
|
|
|
(x)
|
Voluntary
Salary and Incentive Deferral Plan, as amended, incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10(xi) to Grainger's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2007.
|
|
|
(xi)
|
Summary
Description of Directors Compensation Program effective April 29, 2009,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(xiii) to Grainger’s Annual Report
on Form10-K for the year ended December 31,
2008.
|
|
|
(xii)
|
Summary
Description of Directors Compensation Program effective April 28,
2010.
|
|
|
(xiii)
|
2005 Incentive
Plan, as amended, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(d) to Grainger's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2006.
|
|
|
(xiv)
|
Form of Stock
Option Award Agreement between Grainger and certain of its executive
officers, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(xiv) to Grainger's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2005.
|
|
|
(xv)
|
Form of Stock
Option and Restricted Stock Unit Agreement between Grainger and certain of
its executive officers, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(xv) to
Grainger's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2005.
|
|
|
(xvi)
(xvii)
|
Form of Stock
Option Award Agreement between Grainger and certain of its executive
officers.
Form of
Stock Option and Restricted Stock Unit Agreement between Grainger and
certain of its international executive
officers.
|
|
|
(xviii)
|
Form of
Performance Share Award Agreement between Grainger and certain of its
executive officers, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(xvi) to
Grainger's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2005.
|
|
|
(xix)
|
Form of
Performance Share Award Agreement (non-dividend equivalent) between
Grainger and certain of its executive officers, incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10(xviii) to Grainger's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
(xx)
(xxi)
|
Form of
Performance Share Award Agreement (non-dividend equivalent and
recoupment) between Grainger and certain of its executive
officers.
Offer of
Employment Letter to Mr. D.G. Macpherson dated December 14,
2007.
|
|
|
(xxii)
|
Summary
Description of 2008 Management Incentive Program, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10(xviii) to Grainger's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31,
2007.
|
|
|
(xxiii)
|
Summary
Description of 2009 Management Incentive Program, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10(xxi) to Grainger’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
(xxiv)
|
Summary
Description of 2010 Management Incentive
Program.
|
|
|
(xxv)
|
Incentive
Program Recoupment Agreement.
|
|
|
(21)
|
Subsidiaries
of Grainger.
|
|
|
(23)
|
Consent of
Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm.
|
|
|
(31)
|
Rule 13a –
14(a)/15d – 14(a) Certifications
|
|
|
(a)
|
Chief
Executive Officer certification pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
(b)
|
Chief
Financial Officer certification pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
(32)
|
Section 1350
Certifications
|
|
|
(a)
|
Chief
Executive Officer certification pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
(b)
|
Chief
Financial Officer certification pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
INDEX
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
December 31, 2009,
2008 and 2007
|
Page(s)
|
|
MANAGEMENT’S
ANNUAL REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL
REPORTING
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
REPORTS OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
|
28-29
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE EARNINGS
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
|
32-33
|
|
|
|
|
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
34-35
|
|
|
|
|
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
36-37
|
|
|
|
|
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
38-62
|
|
|
|
|
EXHIBIT 23 –
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM
|
64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MANAGEMENT’S
ANNUAL REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
The management of
W.W. Grainger, Inc. (Grainger) is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting. Grainger’s internal control
system was designed to provide reasonable assurance to Grainger’s management and
Board of Directors regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
Because of its
inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent
or detect misstatements under all potential conditions. Therefore, effective
internal control over financial reporting provides only reasonable, and not
absolute, assurance with respect to the preparation and presentation of
financial statements.
Grainger’s
management assessed the effectiveness of Grainger’s internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on the framework set forth by
the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal
Control – Integrated Framework. Based
on its assessment under that framework and the criteria established therein,
Grainger’s management concluded that Grainger’s internal control over financial
reporting was effective as of December 31, 2009.
Ernst & Young
LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has audited Grainger’s
internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, as stated in
their report which is included herein.
REPORT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of
Directors and Shareholders
W.W. Grainger,
Inc.
We have audited W.W.
Grainger, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,
2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(the COSO criteria). W.W Grainger, Inc.’s management is responsible for
maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting
included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over
Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the
company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our
audit.
We conducted our
audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective
internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over
financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing
and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based
on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal
control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial
reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the
maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect
the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide
reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are
being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of
the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s
assets that could have a material effect on the financial
statements.
Because of its
inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent
or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of
effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance
with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In
our opinion, W.W. Grainger, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective
internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on the
COSO criteria.
We
also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of
W.W. Grainger, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, and
the related consolidated statements of earnings, comprehensive earnings,
shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period
ended December 31, 2009 of W.W. Grainger, Inc., and our report dated February
25, 2010, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ Ernst & Young
LLP
Chicago,
Illinois
February 25,
2010
REPORT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The
Board of Directors and Shareholders
W.W. Grainger,
Inc.
We have audited the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets of W.W Grainger, Inc. and subsidiaries
as of December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, and the related consolidated statements
of earnings, comprehensive earnings, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for
each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our
audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the
financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects,
the consolidated financial position of W.W. Grainger, Inc. and subsidiaries at
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, and the consolidated results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2009, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles.
As described in Note
16 to the consolidated financial statements, effective January 1, 2007, the
Company changed its method of accounting for uncertain tax positions to conform
with ASC 740.
As described in Note
17 to the consolidated financial statements, effective January 1, 2009, the
Company changed its method of computing earnings per share to the two-class
method from the treasury stock method to conform with ASC 260.
We also have
audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), W.W. Grainger, Inc.’s internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria established in
Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 25, 2010,
expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ Ernst & Young
LLP
Chicago,
Illinois
February 25,
2010
W.W.
Grainger, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
(In thousands of
dollars, except for per share amounts)
|
|
|
For the Years
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Net
sales
|
|
$ |
6,221,991 |
|
|
$ |
6,850,032 |
|
|
$ |
6,418,014 |
|
|
Cost of
merchandise sold
|
|
|
3,623,465 |
|
|
|
4,041,810 |
|
|
|
3,814,391 |
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
2,598,526 |
|
|
|
2,808,222 |
|
|
|
2,603,623 |
|
|
Warehousing,
marketing and administrative expenses
|
|
|
1,933,302 |
|
|
|
2,025,550 |
|
|
|
1,932,970 |
|
|
Operating earnings
|
|
|
665,224 |
|
|
|
782,672 |
|
|
|
670,653 |
|
|
Other income
and (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
1,358 |
|
|
|
5,069 |
|
|
|
12,125 |
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(8,766 |
) |
|
|
(14,485 |
) |
|
|
(2,974 |
) |
|
Equity in net income of unconsolidated
entities
|
|
|
1,497 |
|
|
|
3,642 |
|
|
|
2,016 |
|
|
Gain (write-off) of investment in
unconsolidated entities
|
|
|
47,343 |
|
|
|
(6,031 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
|
Other non-operating income
|
|
|
964 |
|
|
|
2,668 |
|
|
|
404 |
|
|
Other non-operating expense
|
|
|
(283 |
) |
|
|
(317 |
) |
|
|
(363 |
) |
|
Total other income and (expense)
|
|
|
42,113 |
|
|
|
(9,454 |
) |
|
|
11,208 |
|
|
Earnings before income taxes
|
|
|
707,337 |
|
|
|
773,218 |
|
|
|
681,861 |
|
|
Income
taxes
|
|
|
276,565 |
|
|
|
297,863 |
|
|
|
261,741 |
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
430,772 |
|
|
|
475,355 |
|
|
|
420,120 |
|
|
Less: Net earnings attributable to
noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
306 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
Net earnings attributable to W.W.
Grainger, Inc.
|
|
$ |
430,466 |
|
|
$ |
475,355 |
|
|
$ |
420,120 |
|
|
Earnings per
share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
5.70 |
|
|
$ |
6.07 |
|
|
$ |
5.01 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
5.62 |
|
|
$ |
5.97 |
|
|
$ |
4.91 |
|
|
Weighted
average number of shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
73,786,346 |
|
|
|
76,579,856 |
|
|
|
82,403,958 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
74,891,852 |
|
|
|
77,887,620 |
|
|
|
84,173,381 |
|
The accompanying
notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
W.W.
Grainger, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE EARNINGS
(In thousands of
dollars)
|
|
|
For the Years
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Net
earnings
|
|
$ |
430,772 |
|
|
$ |
475,355 |
|
|
$ |
420,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
comprehensive earnings (losses):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
currency translation adjustments, net of tax (expense)
benefit of
$(7,813), $11,454 and $(9,279), respectively
|
|
|
54,693 |
|
|
|
(79,287 |
) |
|
|
53,545 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification
of cumulative currency translation gain
|
|
|
(3,145 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined
postretirement benefit plan:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior service
(cost) credit arising during period
|
|
|
(8,715 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
9,433 |
|
|
Amortization
of prior service credit
|
|
|
(1,215 |
) |
|
|
(1,215 |
) |
|
|
(437 |
) |
|
Amortization
of transition asset
|
|
|
(143 |
) |
|
|
(143 |
) |
|
|
(143 |
) |
|
Net gain
(loss) arising during period
|
|
|
3,402 |
|
|
|
(49,872 |
) |
|
|
11,620 |
|
|
Amortization
of unrecognized losses
|
|
|
4,135 |
|
|
|
1,312 |
|
|
|
2,094 |
|
|
Income tax
benefit (expense)
|
|
|
984 |
|
|
|
19,368 |
|
|
|
(8,756 |
) |
|
Net defined
postretirement benefit plan adjustments
|
|
|
(1,552 |
) |
|
|
(30,550 |
) |
|
|
13,811 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss)
on other employment-related benefit plans, net of tax benefit (expense) of
$205, $544 and $(878), respectively
|
|
|
(554 |
) |
|
|
(859 |
) |
|
|
1,384 |
|
|
Total other
comprehensive earnings (losses)
|
|
|
49,442 |
|
|
|
(110,696 |
) |
|
|
68,740 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
earnings, net of tax
|
|
|
480,214 |
|
|
|
364,659 |
|
|
|
488,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
earnings attributable to noncontrolling interest:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
(306 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
Foreign currency translation
adjustments
|
|
|
1,457 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
Comprehensive
earnings attributable to W.W. Grainger, Inc.
|
|
$ |
481,365 |
|
|
$ |
364,659 |
|
|
$ |
488,860 |
|
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of these financial statements.
W.W.
Grainger, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands of
dollars, except for per share amounts)
|
|
|
As of
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
459,871 |
|
|
$ |
396,290 |
|
|
$ |
113,437 |
|
|
Marketable
securities at cost, which approximates market value
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
20,074 |
|
|
Accounts
receivable (less allowances for doubtful accounts of $25,850, $26,481 and
$25,830, respectively)
|
|
|
624,910 |
|
|
|
589,416 |
|
|
|
602,650 |
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
889,679 |
|
|
|
1,009,932 |
|
|
|
946,327 |
|
|
Prepaid
expenses and other assets
|
|
|
88,364 |
|
|
|
73,359 |
|
|
|
61,666 |
|
|
Deferred
income taxes
|
|
|
42,023 |
|
|
|
52,556 |
|
|
|
56,663 |
|
|
Prepaid
income taxes
|
|
|
26,668 |
|
|
|
22,556 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
Total
current assets
|
|
|
2,131,515 |
|
|
|
2,144,109 |
|
|
|
1,800,817 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROPERTY,
BUILDINGS AND EQUIPMENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
237,867 |
|
|
|
192,916 |
|
|
|
178,321 |
|
|
Buildings,
structures and improvements
|
|
|
1,078,439 |
|
|
|
1,048,440 |
|
|
|
977,837 |
|
|
Furniture,
fixtures, machinery and equipment
|
|
|
950,187 |
|
|
|
890,507 |
|
|
|
848,118 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,266,493 |
|
|
|
2,131,863 |
|
|
|
2,004,276 |
|
|
Less
accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
1,313,222 |
|
|
|
1,201,552 |
|
|
|
1,125,931 |
|
|
Property,
buildings and equipment – net
|
|
|
953,271 |
|
|
|
930,311 |
|
|
|
878,345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEFERRED
INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
79,472 |
|
|
|
97,442 |
|
|
|
54,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTMENTS
IN UNCONSOLIDATED ENTITIES
|
|
|
3,508 |
|
|
|
20,830 |
|
|
|
14,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GOODWILL
|
|
|
351,182 |
|
|
|
213,159 |
|
|
|
233,028 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER ASSETS
AND INTANGIBLES – NET
|
|
|
207,384 |
|
|
|
109,566 |
|
|
|
112,421 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
ASSETS
|
|
$ |
3,726,332 |
|
|
$ |
3,515,417 |
|
|
$ |
3,094,028 |
|
W.W.
Grainger, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS – CONTINUED
(In thousands of
dollars, except for per share amounts)
|
|
|
As of
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term
debt
|
|
$ |
34,780 |
|
|
$ |
19,960 |
|
|
$ |
102,060 |
|
|
Current
maturities of long-term debt
|
|
|
53,128 |
|
|
|
21,257 |
|
|
|
4,590 |
|
|
Trade
accounts payable
|
|
|
300,791 |
|
|
|
290,802 |
|
|
|
297,929 |
|
|
Accrued
compensation and benefits
|
|
|
135,323 |
|
|
|
162,380 |
|
|
|
182,275 |
|
|
Accrued
contributions to employees’ profit sharing plans
|
|
|
121,895 |
|
|
|
146,922 |
|
|
|
126,483 |
|
|
Accrued
expenses
|
|
|
124,150 |
|
|
|
118,633 |
|
|
|
102,607 |
|
|
Income
taxes payable
|
|
|
6,732 |
|
|
|
1,780 |
|
|
|
10,459 |
|
|
Total
current liabilities
|
|
|
776,799 |
|
|
|
761,734 |
|
|
|
826,403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LONG-TERM
DEBT (less
current maturities)
|
|
|
437,500 |
|
|
|
488,228 |
|
|
|
4,895 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEFERRED
INCOME TAXES AND TAX UNCERTAINTIES
|
|
|
62,215 |
|
|
|
33,219 |
|
|
|
20,727 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACCRUED
EMPLOYMENT-RELATED BENEFITS
COSTS
|
|
|
222,619 |
|
|
|
198,431 |
|
|
|
143,895 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS’
EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative
Preferred Stock – $5 par value
– 12,000,000 shares authorized;
none issued
nor outstanding
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
Common
Stock – $0.50 par value – 300,000,000
shares authorized;
109,659,219
shares issued
|
|
|
54,830 |
|
|
|
54,830 |
|
|
|
54,830 |
|
|
Additional
contributed capital
|
|
|
596,358 |
|
|
|
564,728 |
|
|
|
475,350 |
|
|
Retained
earnings
|
|
|
3,966,508 |
|
|
|
3,670,726 |
|
|
|
3,316,875 |
|
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive earnings (losses)
|
|
|
12,374 |
|
|
|
(38,525 |
) |
|
|
72,171 |
|
|
Treasury
stock, at cost – 37,382,703,
34,878,190 and
30,199,804
shares, respectively
|
|
|
(2,466,350 |
) |
|
|
(2,217,954 |
) |
|
|
(1,821,118 |
) |
|
Total W.W. Grainger, Inc. shareholders’ equity
|
|
|
2,163,720 |
|
|
|
2,033,805 |
|
|
|
2,098,108 |
|
|
Noncontrolling
interest
|
|
|
63,479 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
Total
shareholders’ equity
|
|
|
2,227,199 |
|
|
|
2,033,805 |
|
|
|
2,098,108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|
$ |
3,726,332 |
|
|
$ |
3,515,417 |
|
|
$ |
3,094,028 |
|
The accompanying
notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
W.W.
Grainger, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands of
dollars)
|
|
|
For the Years
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS
FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$ |
430,772 |
|
|
$ |
475,355 |
|
|
$ |
420,120 |
|
|
Provision for losses on accounts
receivable
|
|
|
10,748 |
|
|
|
12,924 |
|
|
|
15,436 |
|
|
Deferred income taxes and tax
uncertainties
|
|
|
21,683 |
|
|
|
5,182 |
|
|
|
(18,632 |
) |
|
Depreciation and
amortization
|
|
|
147,531 |
|
|
|
139,570 |
|
|
|
131,999 |
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
40,407 |
|
|
|
45,945 |
|
|
|
35,551 |
|
|
Tax benefit of stock incentive
plans
|
|
|
2,894 |
|
|
|
1,925 |
|
|
|
3,193 |
|
|
Net losses (gains) on property, buildings
and equipment
|
|
|
8,642 |
|
|
|
(9,232 |
) |
|
|
(7,254 |
) |
|
Income from unconsolidated entities –
net
|
|
|
(1,497 |
) |
|
|
(3,642 |
) |
|
|
(2,016 |
) |
|
(Gain) write-off of unconsolidated
entities
|
|
|
(47,343 |
) |
|
|
6,031 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
Change in operating assets and liabilities
– net of business acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase) decrease in accounts
receivable
|
|
|
2,794 |
|
|
|
(5,592 |
) |
|
|
(41,814 |
) |
|
(Increase) decrease in
inventories
|
|
|
175,286 |
|
|
|
(92,518 |
) |
|
|
(97,234 |
) |
|
(Increase) decrease in prepaid
expenses
|
|
|
(11,180 |
) |
|
|
(33,629 |
) |
|
|
(2,342 |
) |
|
Increase (decrease) in trade accounts
payable
|
|
|
(16,736 |
) |
|
|
(6,960 |
) |
|
|
(39,436 |
) |
|
Increase (decrease) in other current
liabilities
|
|
|
(52,944 |
) |
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
54,457 |
|
|
Increase (decrease) in current income
taxes payable
|
|
|
2,472 |
|
|
|
(7,784 |
) |
|
|
2,304 |
|
|
Increase (decrease) in accrued
employment-related benefits costs
|
|
|
22,080 |
|
|
|
3,216 |
|
|
|
17,705 |
|
|
Other – net
|
|
|
(3,213 |
) |
|
|
(924 |
) |
|
|
(3,162 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating
activities
|
|
|
732,396 |
|
|
|
530,066 |
|
|
|
468,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS
FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to property, buildings and
equipment
|
|
|
(142,414 |
) |
|
|
(194,975 |
) |
|
|
(197,423 |
) |
|
Proceeds from sales of property, buildings and equipment
|
|
|
1,684 |
|
|
|
13,620 |
|
|
|
12,084 |
|
|
Cash paid for business acquisitions, net
of cash acquired, and other investments
|
|
|
(121,833 |
) |
|
|
(14,793 |
) |
|
|
(9,480 |
) |
|
Investments in unconsolidated
entities
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(6,487 |
) |
|
|
(2,138 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing
activities
|
|
$ |
(262,563 |
) |
|
$ |
(202,635 |
) |
|
$ |
(196,957 |
) |
W.W.
Grainger, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS – CONTINUED
(In thousands of
dollars)
|
|
|
For the Years
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS
FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
(decrease) increase in commercial paper
|
|
$ |
– |
|
|
$ |
(95,947 |
) |
|
$ |
95,947 |
|
|
Borrowings
under line of credit
|
|
|
46,125 |
|
|
|
29,959 |
|
|
|
14,107 |
|
|
Payments
against line of credit
|
|
|
(43,583 |
) |
|
|
(15,437 |
) |
|
|
(7,751 |
) |
|
Proceeds
from issuance of long-term debt
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
Payments
of long-term debt
|
|
|
(18,856 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
Proceeds
from stock options exercised
|
|
|
91,165 |
|
|
|
46,833 |
|
|
|
113,500 |
|
|
Excess tax
benefits from stock-based compensation
|
|
|
19,030 |
|
|
|
13,533 |
|
|
|
30,696 |
|
|
Purchase
of treasury stock
|
|
|
(372,727 |
) |
|
|
(394,247 |
) |
|
|
(647,293 |
) |
|
Cash
dividends paid
|
|
|
(134,684 |
) |
|
|
(121,504 |
) |
|
|
(113,093 |
) |
|
Net cash used
in financing activities
|
|
|
(413,530 |
) |
|
|
(36,810 |
) |
|
|
(513,887 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange rate
effect on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
7,278 |
|
|
|
(7,768 |
) |
|
|
6,935 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCREASE
(DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
|
|
63,581 |
|
|
|
282,853 |
|
|
|
(235,034 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents at beginning of year
|
|
|
396,290 |
|
|
|
113,437 |
|
|
|
348,471 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents at end of year
|
|
$ |
459,871 |
|
|
$ |
396,290 |
|
|
$ |
113,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
payments for interest (net of amounts capitalized)
|
|
$ |
8,766 |
|
|
$ |
14,508 |
|
|
$ |
4,409 |
|
|
Cash
payments for income taxes
|
|
|
235,043 |
|
|
|
306,960 |
|
|
|
244,541 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncash
investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
value of noncash assets acquired in business acquisitions
|
|
$ |
324,913 |
|
|
$ |
41,068 |
|
|
$ |
5,039 |
|
|
Liabilities
assumed in business acquisitions
|
|
|
(75,530 |
) |
|
|
(6,778 |
) |
|
|
(341 |
) |
The accompanying
notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
W.W.
Grainger, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(In thousands of
dollars, except for per share amounts)
|
|
|
W.W. Grainger,
Inc. Shareholders’ Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
Stock
|
|
|
Additional
Contributed Capital
|
|
|
Retained
Earnings
|
|
|
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Earnings (Losses)
|
|
|
Treasury
Stock
|
|
|
Noncontrolling
Interest
|
|
|
Balance at
January 1, 2007
|
|
$ |
54,829 |
|
|
$ |
478,454 |
|
|
$ |
3,007,606 |
|
|
$ |
3,431 |
|
|
$ |
(1,366,705 |
) |
|
$ |
– |
|
|
Cumulative
effect of a change in
accounting principle
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
870 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
Reinstatement
of equity method
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
1,372 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
Exercise of
stock options
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(19,991 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
133,491 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
Tax benefits
on stock-based
compensation awards
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
33,889 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
Stock option
expense
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
16,888 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
Amortization
of other stock-based
compensation awards
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
18,667 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
Vesting of
restricted stock
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(1,126 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
|
Settlement of
other stock-based
compensation awards
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(2,557 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
1,189 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
Purchase of
treasury stock
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(50,000 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(587,967 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
|
Net
earnings
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
420,120 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
Other
comprehensive earnings
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
68,740 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
Cash dividends
paid ($1.34
per share)
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(113,093 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
Balance at
December 31, 2007
|
|
$ |
54,830 |
|
|
$ |
475,350 |
|
|
$ |
3,316,875 |
|
|
$ |
72,171 |
|
|
$ |
(1,821,118 |
) |
|
$ |
– |
|
|
Exercise of
stock options
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(12,663 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
59,460 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
Tax benefits
on stock-based
compensation awards
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
15,458 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
Stock option
expense
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
19,868 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
Amortization
of other stock-based
compensation awards
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
26,077 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
Vesting of
restricted stock
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(417 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
|
Settlement of
other stock-based
compensation awards
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(9,362 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
5,209 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
Purchase of
treasury stock
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(461,088 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
|
Net
earnings
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
475,355 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
Other
comprehensive earnings
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(110,696 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
Cash dividends
paid ($1.55
per share)
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(121,504 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
Balance at
December 31, 2008
|
|
$ |
54,830 |
|
|
$ |
564,728 |
|
|
$ |
3,670,726 |
|
|
$ |
(38,525 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,217,954 |
) |
|
$ |
– |
|
W.W.
Grainger, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY – CONTINUED
(In thousands of
dollars, except for per share amounts)
|
|
|
W.W. Grainger,
Inc. Shareholders’ Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
Stock
|
|
|
Additional
Contributed Capital
|
|
|
Retained
Earnings
|
|
|
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Earnings (Losses)
|
|
|
Treasury
Stock
|
|
|
Noncontrolling
Interest
|
|
|
Balance at
December 31, 2008
|
|
$ |
54,830 |
|
|
$ |
564,728 |
|
|
$ |
3,670,726 |
|
|
$ |
(38,525 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,217,954 |
) |
|
$ |
– |
|
|
Exercise of
stock options
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(15,614 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
106,255 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
Tax benefits
on stock-based
compensation
awards
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
21,924 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
Stock option
expense
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
16,100 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
Amortization
of other stock-based
compensation awards
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
24,307 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
Vesting of
restricted stock
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(926 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
|
Settlement of
other stock-based
compensation awards
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(15,087 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
8,525 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
Purchase of
treasury stock
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(362,250 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
|
Net
earnings
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
430,466 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
306 |
|
|
Other
comprehensive earnings
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
50,899 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(1,457 |
) |
|
Cash dividends
paid ($1.78
per share)
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(134,684 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
Change in
subsidiary ownership
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
64,436 |
|
|
Balance at
December 31, 2009
|
|
$ |
54,830 |
|
|
$ |
596,358 |
|
|
$ |
3,966,508 |
|
|
$ |
12,374 |
|
|
$ |
(2,466,350 |
) |
|
$ |
63,479 |
|
The accompanying
notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
W.W.
Grainger, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009,
2008 and 2007
NOTE
1 – BACKGROUND AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
INDUSTRY
INFORMATION
W.W. Grainger, Inc.
is the leading broad-line supplier of facilities maintenance and other related
products and services in North America, with operations primarily in the United
States, Canada, Japan and Mexico. In this report, the words “Company”
or “Grainger” mean W.W. Grainger, Inc. and its subsidiaries.
PRINCIPLES OF
CONSOLIDATION
The
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its
subsidiaries. All significant intercompany transactions are eliminated from the
consolidated financial statements.
INVESTMENTS IN
UNCONSOLIDATED ENTITIES
For
investments in which the Company owns or controls from 20% to 50% of the voting
shares, the equity method of accounting is used. Changes in interest arising
from the issuance of stock by an investee are accounted for as additional
contributed capital. See Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements.
MANAGEMENT
ESTIMATES
In
preparing financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America, management is required to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities, revenues and expenses, and the disclosure of contingent
liabilities. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
FOREIGN CURRENCY
TRANSLATION
The
financial statements of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries are measured using
the local currency as the functional currency. Net exchange gains or losses
resulting from the translation of financial statements of foreign operations and
related long-term debt are recorded as a separate component of other
comprehensive earnings. See Notes 2 and 14 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements.
SUBSEQUENT
EVENTS
The
Company has evaluated subsequent events through February 25, 2010, the date the
financial statements were issued.
NOTE
2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
REVENUE
RECOGNITION
Revenues recognized
include product sales, billings for freight and handling charges and fees earned
for services provided. The Company recognizes product sales and billings for
freight and handling charges primarily on the date products are shipped to, or
picked up by, the customer. The Company’s standard shipping terms are FOB
shipping point. On occasion, the Company will negotiate FOB destination terms.
These sales are recognized upon delivery to the customer. Fee revenues, which
account for less than 1% of total revenues, are recognized after services are
completed.
COST OF MERCHANDISE
SOLD
Cost of merchandise
sold includes product and product-related costs, vendor consideration,
freight-out and handling costs. The Company defines handling costs as those
costs incurred to fulfill a shipped sales order.
VENDOR
CONSIDERATION
The
Company receives rebates and allowances from its vendors to promote their
products. The Company utilizes numerous advertising programs to promote its
vendors’ products, including catalogs and other printed media, Internet and
other marketing programs. Most of these programs relate to multiple vendors,
which makes supporting the specific, identifiable and incremental criteria
difficult, and would require numerous assumptions and judgments. Based on the
inexact nature of trying to track reimbursements to the exact advertising
expenditure for each vendor, the Company treats most vendor advertising
allowances as a reduction of Cost of merchandise sold rather than a reduction of
operating (advertising) expenses. Rebates earned from vendors that are based on
product purchases are capitalized into inventory as part of product purchase
price. These rebates are credited to cost of merchandise sold based on sales.
Vendor rebates that are earned based on products sold are credited directly to
Cost of merchandise sold.
ADVERTISING
Advertising costs
are expensed in the year the related advertisement is first presented.
Advertising expense was $114.6 million, $120.7 million and $122.4 million for
2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively. Most vendor-provided allowances are
classified as an offset to Cost of merchandise sold. For additional information
see VENDOR CONSIDERATION above.
Catalog expense is
amortized equally over the life of the catalog, beginning in the month of its
distribution. Advertising costs for catalogs that have not been distributed by
year-end are capitalized as Prepaid expenses. Amounts included in Prepaid
expenses at December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007 were $48.1 million, $39.5 million,
and $32.1 million, respectively.
WAREHOUSING,
MARKETING AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
Included in this
category are purchasing, branch operations, information services, and marketing
and selling expenses, as well as other types of general and administrative
costs.
STOCK INCENTIVE
PLANS
The
Company measures all share-based payments using fair-value-based methods and
records compensation expense related to these payments over the vesting period.
See Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
INCOME
TAXES
Income taxes are
recognized during the year in which transactions enter into the determination of
financial statement income, with deferred taxes being provided for temporary
differences between financial and tax reporting.
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE
EARNINGS (LOSSES)
The
Company’s Other comprehensive earnings (losses) include foreign currency
translation adjustments and unrecognized gains (losses) on postretirement and
other employment-related benefit plans. See Note 14 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements.
CASH AND MARKETABLE
SECURITIES
The
Company considers investments in highly liquid debt instruments, purchased with
an original maturity of ninety days or less, to be cash equivalents. For cash
equivalents, the carrying amount approximates fair value due to the short
maturity of these instruments.
The
Company’s investments in marketable securities consist of commercial paper to be
held to maturity. These investments have an original maturity date of more than
90 days. The investments are issued from high credit quality issuers. The
marketable securities are recorded at cost, which approximates fair
value.
CONCENTRATION OF
CREDIT RISK
The
Company places temporary cash investments with institutions of high credit
quality and, by policy, limits the amount of credit exposure to any one
institution.
The
Company has a broad customer base representing many diverse industries doing
business in all regions of the United States, Canada, Mexico, Panama, India,
Japan, and China. Consequently, no significant concentration of credit risk is
considered to exist.
ALLOWANCE FOR
DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS
The
Company establishes reserves for customer accounts that are potentially
uncollectible. The method used to estimate the allowances is based on several
factors, including the age of the receivables and the historical ratio of actual
write-offs to the age of the receivables. These analyses also take into
consideration economic conditions that may have an impact on a specific
industry, group of customers or a specific customer.
INVENTORIES
Inventories are
valued at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined primarily by the
last-in, first-out (LIFO) method, which accounts for approximately 74% of total
inventory. For the remaining inventory, cost is determined by the first-in,
first-out (FIFO) method.
PROPERTY, BUILDINGS
AND EQUIPMENT
Property, buildings
and equipment are valued at cost. For financial statement purposes, depreciation
and amortization are provided in amounts sufficient to relate the cost of
depreciable assets to operations over their estimated service lives, principally
on the declining-balance and sum-of-the-years-digits methods. The principal
estimated useful lives for determining depreciation are as follows:
|
Buildings,
structures and improvements
|
10 to 30
years
|
|
Furniture,
fixtures, machinery and equipment
|
3
to 10 years
|
Improvements to
leased property are amortized over the initial terms of the respective leases or
the estimated service lives of the improvements, whichever is
shorter.
The
Company capitalized interest costs of $0.5 million, $1.3 million and $1.4
million in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
LONG-LIVED
ASSETS
The
carrying value of long-lived assets is evaluated whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the asset may be impaired. An
impairment loss is recognized when estimated undiscounted future cash flows
resulting from use of the asset, including disposition, are less than the
carrying value of the asset. Impairment is measured as the amount by which the
carrying amount exceeds the fair value.
During 2009, the
Company recognized impairment charges of $9.0 million included in Warehousing,
marketing and administrative expenses, to reduce the carrying value of certain
long-lived assets to their estimated fair value pursuant to impairment
indicators for property currently held for sale, lease terminations, idle
assets, and branch closures.
GOODWILL AND OTHER
INTANGIBLES
Goodwill is
recognized as the excess cost of an acquired entity over the net amount assigned
to assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Goodwill is not amortized, but
rather tested for impairment on an annual basis and more often if circumstances
require. Impairment losses are recognized whenever the implied fair value of
goodwill is less than its carrying value.
The
Company recognizes an acquired intangible apart from goodwill whenever the
intangible arises from contractual or other legal rights, or whenever it can be
separated or divided from the acquired entity and sold, transferred, licensed,
rented or exchanged, either individually or in combination with a related
contract, asset or liability. Such intangibles are amortized over their
estimated useful lives unless the estimated useful life is determined to be
indefinite. Amortizable intangible assets are being amortized over useful lives
of one to 20 years. Impairment losses are recognized if the carrying amount of
an intangible, subject to amortization, is not recoverable from expected future
cash flows and its carrying amount exceeds its fair value.
The
Company also maintains intangible assets with indefinite lives, which are not
amortized. These intangibles are tested for impairment on an annual basis and
more often if circumstances require. Impairment losses are recognized whenever
the implied fair value of these assets is less than their carrying
value.
FAIR VALUE OF
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The
carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, receivables, and accounts payable
approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of these financial
instruments. The carrying value of long-term debt also approximates
fair value due to the variable interest rates that are tied to
LIBOR.
INSURANCE
RESERVES
The
Company purchases insurance for catastrophic exposures and those risks required
to be insured by law. It also retains a significant portion of the risk of
certain losses related to workers’ compensation, general liability and property
losses through the utilization of high deductibles and self-insured retentions.
Reserves for these potential losses are based on an external analysis of the
Company’s historical claims results and other actuarial
assumptions.
WARRANTY
RESERVES
The
Company generally warrants the products it sells against defects for one year.
For a significant portion of warranty claims, the manufacturer of the product is
responsible for expenses. For warranty expenses not covered by the manufacturer,
the Company provides a reserve for future costs based primarily on historical
experience. The reserve activity was as follows (in thousands of
dollars):
|
|
|
For the Years
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Beginning
balance
|
|
$ |
3,218 |
|
|
$ |
3,442 |
|
|
$ |
4,651 |
|
|
Returns
|
|
|
(11,727 |
) |
|
|
(12,917 |
) |
|
|
(12,781 |
) |
|
Provisions
|
|
|
11,747 |
|
|
|
12,693 |
|
|
|
11,572 |
|
|
Ending
balance
|
|
$ |
3,238 |
|
|
$ |
3,218 |
|
|
$ |
3,442 |
|
NEW
ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
In December 2008,
the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued authoritative guidance
regarding employer’s disclosures about postretirement benefit plan assets,
codified primarily in ASC 715. ASC 715 requires expanded disclosures
about investment policies and strategies for the plan assets of a defined
benefit pension or other postretirement plan, including information regarding
major categories of assets, input and valuation techniques used to measure the
fair value of plan assets and significant concentrations of risk within the
plans. The Company has applied the provision of ASC 715 and the
adoption did not have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations
or financial position.
In
May 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance regarding subsequent events,
codified primarily in ASC 855, which provides authoritative accounting guidance
for subsequent events. ASC 855 addresses events that occur after the
balance sheet date but before the issuance of the financial
statements. It distinguishes between subsequent events that should be
recognized in the financial statements and those that should
not. Also, it requires disclosure of the date through which
subsequent events were evaluated and disclosures for certain non-recognized
events. ASC 855 was effective on a prospective basis for interim or
annual financial periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Company has
applied the provision of ASC 855 and disclosed the date through which it has
evaluated subsequent events and the basis for choosing that date. The
adoption of ASC 855 did not have a material effect on the Company’s results of
operations or financial position.
In
June 2009, the FASB issued “The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the
Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles,” codified in ASC 105,
which established the FASB Accounting Standards Codification as the source of
authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles to be applied by
non-governmental entities. The Accounting Standards Codification
superseded all existing non-SEC accounting and reporting
standards. ASC 105 was effective for interim or annual financial
periods ending after September 15, 2009. The Company has applied this
statement and the adoption did not have a material effect on its results of
operations or financial position.
NOTE
3 – BUSINESS ACQUISITIONS
During 2009, the
Company acquired three companies for approximately $134 million, less cash
acquired. The total cost of the acquisitions has been allocated to
the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed based upon their estimated fair
values at the respective dates of acquisition. The estimated purchase
price allocations are preliminary and subject to revisions based on additional
valuation work related to intangibles. Purchased identifiable
intangible assets totalled approximately $49 million and will be amortized on a
straight-line basis over a weighted average life of 15 years (lives ranging from
one to 20 years). Acquired intangibles primarily consist of product
line copyrights, proprietary software, customer relationships and trade
names. The Company recorded approximately $108 million of goodwill
and other intangibles associated with these acquisitions. The
goodwill is partially deductible for tax purposes.
In
September 2009, the Company acquired 380,000 common shares of MonotaRO Co., Ltd.
(MonotaRO) for approximately $4 million increasing its interest from 48 percent
to 53 percent. As a result of the Company obtaining controlling
voting interest over MonotaRO, the Company consolidated MonotaRO’s balance sheet
as of September 30, 2009. MonotaRO’s earnings are reported on a one
month lag which began in October 2009. The Company previously
accounted for its 48 percent interest in MonotaRO as an equity method
investment. Upon obtaining the controlling interest, the previously
held equity interest was remeasured to fair value, resulting in a pre-tax gain
of $47 million ($28 million after tax) reported as other income in the Company’s
consolidated statement of earnings. The gain includes $3 million
reclassified from Accumulated other comprehensive earnings. Both the
gain on the previously held equity investment and the fair value of the
noncontrolling interest in MonotaRO of $61 million were based on the closing
market price of MonotaRO’s common stock on the acquisition date. The
Company has recorded separately identifiable intangible assets totalling $66
million. The amortizable intangibles primarily consist of customer
relationships which will be amortized on a straight-line basis over 15
years. The indefinite-lived intangible ($32 million) is related to
the MonotaRO trade name. The estimated purchase price allocations are
preliminary and subject to revisions based on additional valuation work of
intangibles. The goodwill recognized in the transaction amounted to
approximately $58 million and is not deductible for tax purposes.
In
June 2009, the Company acquired the remaining 50.1% of its joint venture in
India, Grainger Industrial Supply India Private Limited, formerly known as Asia
Pacific Brands India Private Limited, for $1 million. See Note 6 to
the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding this
acquisition.
During 2008, the
Company acquired two companies for approximately $34 million and during 2007,
the Company acquired one company for approximately $5 million.
The
results of these acquisitions are included in the Company’s consolidated results
from the respective dates of acquisition. Due to the immaterial nature of these
transactions, both individually and in the aggregate, disclosures of amounts
assigned to the acquired assets and assumed liabilities and pro forma results of
operations were not considered necessary.
NOTE
4 – ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS
The
following table shows the activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts (in
thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
For the Years
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Balance at
beginning of period
|
|
$ |
26,481 |
|
|
$ |
25,830 |
|
|
$ |
18,801 |
|
|
Provision for
uncollectible accounts
|
|
|
10,748 |
|
|
|
12,924 |
|
|
|
15,436 |
|
|
Write-off of
uncollectible accounts, net of recoveries
|
|
|
(12,254 |
) |
|
|
(11,501 |
) |
|
|
(8,755 |
) |
|
Foreign
currency translation impact
|
|
|
875 |
|
|
|
(772 |
) |
|
|
348 |
|
|
Balance at end
of period
|
|
$ |
25,850 |
|
|
$ |
26,481 |
|
|
$ |
25,830 |
|
NOTE
5 – INVENTORIES
Inventories
primarily consist of merchandise purchased for resale. Inventories
would have been $333.3 million, $317.0 million and $287.7 million higher than
reported at December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively, if the FIFO method
of inventory accounting had been used for all Company inventories. Net earnings
would have increased by $10.0 million, $18.1 million and $10.8 million for the
years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively, using the FIFO
method of accounting. Inventory values using the FIFO method of accounting
approximate replacement cost.
NOTE
6 – INVESTMENTS IN UNCONSOLIDATED ENTITIES
The
table below summarizes the activity in the investments in unconsolidated
entities (in thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grainger
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industrial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MonotaRO
|
|
|
MRO
Korea
|
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Co.,
Ltd.
|
|
|
Co.,
Ltd.
|
|
|
Private
Ltd.
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance at
December 31, 2006
|
|
$ |
8,492 |
|
|
$ |
– |
|
|
$ |
– |
|
|
$ |
8,492 |
|
|
Cash
investments
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
2,138 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
2,138 |
|
|
Equity
earnings
|
|
|
1,401 |
|
|
|
615 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
2,016 |
|
|
Reinstatement to equity method
of accounting
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
1,372 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
1,372 |
|
|
Foreign currency
gain
|
|
|
620 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
741 |
|
|
Balance at
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
10,513 |
|
|
|
4,246 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
14,759 |
|
|
Cash
investments
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
6,487 |
|
|
|
6,487 |
|
|
Equity earnings
(losses)
|
|
|
4,303 |
|
|
|
(205 |
) |
|
|
(456 |
) |
|
|
3,642 |
|
|
Write-off
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(6,031 |
) |
|
|
(6,031 |
) |
|
Foreign currency gain
(loss)
|
|
|
3,008 |
|
|
|
(1,035 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
1,973 |
|
|
Balance at
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
17,824 |
|
|
|
3,006 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
20,830 |
|
|
Cash
investments
|
|
|
4,013 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
1,194 |
|
|
|
5,207 |
|
|
Equity
earnings
|
|
|
1,249 |
|
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
1,497 |
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
(878 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(878 |
) |
|
Foreign currency (loss)
gain
|
|
|
(468 |
) |
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(214 |
) |
|
Gain (loss) on previously held
equity interest
|
|
|
44,275 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(77 |
) |
|
|
44,198 |
|
|
Investment eliminated in
consolidation
|
|
|
(66,015 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(1,117 |
) |
|
|
(67,132 |
) |
|
Balance at
December 31, 2009
|
|
$ |
– |
|
|
$ |
3,508 |
|
|
$ |
– |
|
|
$ |
3,508 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ownership
interest at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
52.9 |
% |
|
|
49.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
In
September 2009, the Company acquired 380,000 common shares of MonotaRO Co., Ltd.
(MonotaRO) for approximately $4 million, increasing its interest from 48 percent
to 53 percent. The results of MonotaRO are now included in the
Company’s consolidated results from the date of obtaining a controlling voting
interest. The Company previously accounted for its 48 percent
interest in MonotaRO as an equity method investment. Upon obtaining
the controlling interest, the previously held equity interest was remeasured to
fair value, resulting in a pre-tax gain of $47 million ($28 million after-tax)
reported in the Company’s consolidated statement of earnings. The
gain includes $3 million reclassified from Accumulated other comprehensive
earnings.
In
July 2008, the Company acquired a 49.9% interest in Grainger Industrial Supply
India Private Limited (Grainger India), formerly known as Asia Pacific Brands
India Private Limited, from its sole shareholder for $5.4 million. In
addition, the Company and the joint venture partner each made a $1.1 million
capital infusion intended to help grow the business. In the fourth
quarter 2008, the Company wrote-off its investment due to the economic slowdown
in India and the loss of a major supplier that accounted for approximately 25%
of the joint venture’s annual revenue. These conditions severely affected
Grainger India’s ability to secure additional financing to meet its current
obligations and continue as a going concern. The Company accounted for this
investment using the equity method until it was written-off. During
2009, Grainger India’s business improved. It was able to streamline
its operations, strengthen its management and enhance its supplier
base. As a result, the Company acquired the remaining 50.1% of this
joint venture in June 2009 for $1.2 million. The results of Grainger
India are now included in the Company’s consolidated results from the date of
acquisition.
In
2007, the Company and the other business partner in the joint venture agreed to
significantly change the business model and fund the expansion of MRO Korea Co.,
Ltd., which was previously written-off. The Company contributed $2.1 million to
MRO Korea Co., Ltd., maintaining its 49% ownership, and resumed the equity
method of accounting. In conjunction with the reinstatement of the equity
accounting method, a credit was recorded to retained earnings for $1.4 million,
which represented the accumulated unrecognized equity earnings during the period
the equity method was suspended.
NOTE
7 – CAPITALIZED SOFTWARE
Amortization of
capitalized software is on a straight-line basis over three and five years.
Amortization begins when the software is available for its intended use.
Amortization expense was $22.7 million, $22.7 million and $21.0 million for the
years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The Company reviews
the amounts capitalized for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be
recoverable.
NOTE
8 – SHORT-TERM DEBT
The
following summarizes information concerning short-term debt (in thousands of
dollars):
|
|
|
As of December
31,
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Line of
Credit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at
December 31
|
|
$ |
34,780 |
|
|
$ |
19,960 |
|
|
$ |
6,113 |
|
|
Maximum
month-end balance during the year
|
|
$ |
35,371 |
|
|
$ |
19,960 |
|
|
$ |
11,234 |
|
|
Average amount
outstanding during the year
|
|
$ |
33,554 |
|
|
$ |
13,022 |
|
|
$ |
7,756 |
|
|
Weighted
average interest rate during the year
|
|
|
5.22 |
% |
|
|
6.23 |
% |
|
|
6.48 |
% |
|
Weighted
average interest rate at December 31
|
|
|
5.06 |
% |
|
|
4.86 |
% |
|
|
6.57 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
Paper
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at
December 31
|
|
$ |
– |
|
|
$ |
– |
|
|
$ |
95,947 |
|
|
Maximum
month-end balance during the year
|
|
$ |
– |
|
|
$ |
319,860 |
|
|
$ |
139,104 |
|
|
Average amount
outstanding during the year
|
|
$ |
– |
|
|
$ |
54,589 |
|
|
$ |
28,030 |
|
|
Weighted
average interest rate during the year
|
|
|
– |
% |
|
|
3.08 |
% |
|
|
5.38 |
% |
|
Weighted
average interest rate at December 31
|
|
|
– |
% |
|
|
– |
% |
|
|
4.30 |
% |
The
Company had $83.7 million, $29.2 million and $31.1 million of uncommitted lines
of credit denominated in foreign currencies at December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. At December 31, 2009, there was $34.8 million outstanding under
these lines of credit relating to borrowings of foreign subsidiaries. The
foreign subsidiaries utilize the lines of credit to meet business growth and
operating needs.
Commercial paper was
used to fund periodic working capital requirements and the accelerated share
repurchase program. Refer to Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements
for further discussion of the Company’s share repurchase program. A portion of
the proceeds from the $500 million term loan was used to refinance $311 million
in outstanding commercial paper in May of 2008. Refer to Note 9 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion on the use of proceeds
from the term loan.
In
2009, 2008 and 2007, the Company had a committed line of credit totaling $250.0
million for which the Company pays a commitment fee of 0.04% for each year.
There were no borrowings under the committed line of credit.
The
Company had $24.7 million, $18.8 million, and $15.8 million of letters of credit
at December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively, primarily related to the
Company’s insurance program. The Company also had $5.6 million, $6.0 million and
$3.2 million at December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively, in letters of
credit to facilitate the purchase of products from foreign sources.
NOTE
9 – LONG-TERM DEBT
Long-term debt
consisted of the following (in thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
As of December
31,
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Bank term
loan
|
|
$ |
483,333 |
|
|
$ |
500,000 |
|
|
$ |
– |
|
|
Industrial
development revenue and private activity
bonds
|
|
|
7,295 |
|
|
|
9,485 |
|
|
|
9,485 |
|
|
Less current
maturities
|
|
|
(53,128 |
) |
|
|
(21,257 |
) |
|
|
(4,590 |
) |
|
|
|
$ |
437,500 |
|
|
$ |
488,228 |
|
|
$ |
4,895 |
|
In
May 2008, the Company entered into a $500 million, unsecured four-year bank term
loan. Proceeds were used to pay down short-term debt and for general corporate
purposes. The weighted average interest rate paid on the term loan during 2009
was 1.1%. The Company at its option may prepay the term loan in whole or in
part.
The
industrial development revenue and private activity bonds include various issues
that bear interest at variable rates capped at 15%, and come due in various
amounts from 2010 through 2021. The weighted average interest rate paid on the
bonds during the year was 1.09%. Interest rates on some of the issues are
subject to change at certain dates in the future. The bondholders may require
the Company to redeem certain bonds concurrent with a change in interest rates
and certain other bonds annually. In addition, $2.4 million of these bonds had
an unsecured liquidity facility available at December 31, 2009, for
which the Company compensated a bank through a commitment fee of 0.07%. There
were no borrowings related to this facility at December 31, 2009. The Company
classified $2.4 million, $4.6 million, and $4.6 million of bonds currently
subject to redemption options in current maturities of long-term debt at
December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively.
The
scheduled aggregate principal payments are due as follows (in thousands of
dollars):
|
Year
|
|
Payment
Amount
|
|
2010
|
|
$ |
50,728 |
|
|
2011
|
|
|
50,900 |
|
|
2012
|
|
|
387,500 |
|
|
2013
|
|
|
- |
|
|
2014 and after
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
The
Company’s debt instruments include only standard affirmative and negative
covenants for debt instruments of similar amounts and structure. The Company’s
debt instruments do not contain financial or performance covenants restrictive
to the business of the Company, reflecting its strong financial position. The
Company is in compliance with all debt covenants for the year ended December 31,
2009.
NOTE
10 – EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
Retirement
Plans
A
majority of the Company’s employees are covered by a noncontributory profit
sharing plan. This plan provides for annual employer contributions
generally based upon a formula related primarily to earnings before federal
income taxes, limited to a percentage of the total eligible compensation paid to
all eligible employees. The plan was amended in 2008, to establish a minimum
contribution of 8% and a maximum contribution of 18% of total eligible
compensation paid to eligible employees. Prior to 2008, there was no
minimum percentage and the maximum percentage was 25%. The Company
also sponsors additional defined contribution plans, which cover most of the
other employees. Provisions under all plans were $128.1 million, $145.4 million,
and $130.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007,
respectively.
Postretirement
Benefits
The
Company has a postretirement healthcare benefits plan that provides coverage for
a majority of its employees and their dependents should they elect to maintain
such coverage upon retirement. Covered employees become eligible for
participation when they qualify for retirement while working for the Company.
Participation in the plan is voluntary and requires participants to make
contributions toward the cost of the plan, as determined by the
Company.
The
Company’s accumulated postretirement benefit obligation (APBO) and net periodic
benefit costs include the effect of the federal subsidy provided by the
“Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003” (the
Medicare Act). The Medicare Act provides a federal subsidy to retiree healthcare
benefit plan sponsors that provide a prescription drug benefit that is at least
actuarially equivalent to that provided by Medicare. As a result of the subsidy,
the APBO has been reduced by $43.0 million, $45.4 million and $40.4 million as
of December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The subsidy has reduced net
periodic benefits costs by approximately $4.7 million, $5.2 million and
$6.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007,
respectively.
The
net periodic benefits costs charged to operating expenses, which were valued
with a measurement date of January 1 for each year, consisted of the following
components (in thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
For the Years
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Service
cost
|
|
$ |
12,305 |
|
|
$ |
9,699 |
|
|
$ |
10,856 |
|
|
Interest
cost
|
|
|
10,730 |
|
|
|
9,490 |
|
|
|
8,973 |
|
|
Expected
return on assets
|
|
|
(3,402 |
) |
|
|
(4,466 |
) |
|
|
(4,049 |
) |
|
Amortization
of prior service credit
|
|
|
(1,215 |
) |
|
|
(1,215 |
) |
|
|
(437 |
) |
|
Amortization
of transition asset
|
|
|
(143 |
) |
|
|
(143 |
) |
|
|
(143 |
) |
|
Amortization
of unrecognized losses
|
|
|
4,135 |
|
|
|
1,312 |
|
|
|
2,094 |
|
|
Net periodic benefits
costs
|
|
$ |
22,410 |
|
|
$ |
14,677 |
|
|
$ |
17,294 |
|
The
Company has elected to amortize the amount of net unrecognized losses over a
period equal to the average remaining service period for active plan
participants expected to retire and receive benefits of approximately 16.8 years
for 2009.
Reconciliations of
the beginning and ending balances of the APBO, which is calculated using a
December 31 measurement date, the fair value of plan assets and the funded
status of the benefit obligation follow (in thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Benefit
obligation at beginning of year
|
|
$ |
188,639 |
|
|
$ |
150,910 |
|
|
$ |
155,353 |
|
|
Service
cost
|
|
|
12,305 |
|
|
|
9,699 |
|
|
|
10,856 |
|
|
Interest
cost
|
|
|
10,730 |
|
|
|
9,490 |
|
|
|
8,973 |
|
|
Plan participants’
contributions
|
|
|
1,797 |
|
|
|
1,751 |
|
|
|
1,575 |
|
|
Amendments
|
|
|
8,715 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(9,433 |
) |
|
Actuarial loss
(gain)
|
|
|
4,892 |
|
|
|
21,443 |
|
|
|
(12,754 |
) |
|
Benefits
paid
|
|
|
(5,277 |
) |
|
|
(4,924 |
) |
|
|
(3,929 |
) |
|
Medicare Part D Subsidy
received
|
|
|
316 |
|
|
|
270 |
|
|
|
269 |
|
|
Benefit
obligation at end of year
|
|
|
222,117 |
|
|
|
188,639 |
|
|
|
150,910 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of
plan assets at beginning of year
|
|
|
56,703 |
|
|
|
74,432 |
|
|
|
67,486 |
|
|
Actual returns (losses) on plan
assets
|
|
|
11,695 |
|
|
|
(23,963 |
) |
|
|
2,915 |
|
|
Employers’
contributions
|
|
|
9,001 |
|
|
|
9,407 |
|
|
|
6,385 |
|
|
Plan participants’
contributions
|
|
|
1,797 |
|
|
|
1,751 |
|
|
|
1,575 |
|
|
Benefits
paid
|
|
|
(5,277 |
) |
|
|
(4,924 |
) |
|
|
(3,929 |
) |
|
Fair value of
plan assets at end of year
|
|
|
73,919 |
|
|
|
56,703 |
|
|
|
74,432 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent
postretirement benefit obligation
|
|
$ |
148,198 |
|
|
$ |
131,936 |
|
|
$ |
76,478 |
|
The
amounts recognized in Accumulated other comprehensive earnings (losses)
consisted of the following components (in thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
As of December
31,
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Prior service
credit (cost)
|
|
$ |
(552 |
) |
|
$ |
9,377 |
|
|
$ |
10,592 |
|
|
Transition
asset
|
|
|
714 |
|
|
|
857 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
Unrecognized
losses
|
|
|
(66,430 |
) |
|
|
(73,966 |
) |
|
|
(25,405 |
) |
|
Deferred tax
asset
|
|
|
25,784 |
|
|
|
24,800 |
|
|
|
5,432 |
|
|
Net
losses
|
|
$ |
(40,484 |
) |
|
$ |
(38,932 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,381 |
) |
The
components of Accumulated other comprehensive earnings (AOCE) related to the
postretirement benefit costs that will be amortized into net periodic
postretirement benefit costs in 2010 are as follows (in thousands of
dollars):
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Amortization
of prior service credit
|
|
$ |
(494 |
) |
|
Amortization
of transition asset
|
|
|
(143 |
) |
|
Amortization
of unrecognized losses
|
|
|
3,954 |
|
|
Estimated amount to be
amortized from AOCE into
net periodic
postretirement benefit costs
|
|
$ |
3,317 |
|
The
benefit obligation was determined by applying the terms of the plan and
actuarial models. These models include various actuarial assumptions,
including discount rates, assumed rates of return on plan assets and healthcare
cost trend rates. The actuarial assumptions also anticipate future cost-sharing
changes to retiree contributions that will maintain the current cost-sharing
ratio between the Company and the retirees. The Company evaluates its actuarial
assumptions on an annual basis and considers changes in these long-term factors
based upon market conditions and historical experience.
Effective January 1,
2010 (reflected in the 2009 valuation above), the plan was amended to extend its
benefits to an additional group of employees and also include an in-network
deductible, and increased out-of-pocket maximums and hospital co-payments. The
plan amendment effective January 1, 2008 (reflected in the 2007 valuation above)
changed the out-of-pocket maximums, co-payments and coinsurance amounts for
retirees.
The
following assumptions were used to determine net periodic benefit costs at
January 1:
|
|
|
For the Years
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Discount
rate
|
|
|
5.90 |
% |
|
|
6.50 |
% |
|
|
5.90 |
% |
|
Expected
long-term rate of return on plan assets, net of tax at
40%
|
|
|
6.00 |
% |
|
|
6.00 |
% |
|
|
6.00 |
% |
|
Initial
healthcare cost trend rate
|
|
|
10.00 |
% |
|
|
10.00 |
% |
|
|
10.00 |
% |
|
Ultimate
healthcare cost trend rate
|
|
|
5.00 |
% |
|
|
5.00 |
% |
|
|
5.00 |
% |
|
Year ultimate
healthcare cost trend rate reached
|
|
|
2019 |
|
|
|
2018 |
|
|
|
2017 |
|
The
following assumptions were used to determine benefit obligations at December
31:
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Discount
rate
|
|
|
6.00 |
% |
|
|
5.90 |
% |
|
|
6.50 |
% |
|
Expected
long-term rate of return on plan assets, net of tax at
40%
|
|
|
6.00 |
% |
|
|
6.00 |
% |
|
|
6.00 |
% |
|
Initial
healthcare cost trend rate
|
|
|
9.50 |
% |
|
|
10.00 |
% |
|
|
10.00 |
% |
|
Ultimate
healthcare cost trend rate
|
|
|
5.00 |
% |
|
|
5.00 |
% |
|
|
5.00 |
% |
|
Year ultimate
healthcare cost trend rate reached
|
|
|
2019 |
|
|
|
2019 |
|
|
|
2018 |
|
The
discount rate assumptions reflect the rates available on high-quality fixed
income debt instruments. These rates have been selected due to their similarity
to the projected cash flows of the postretirement healthcare benefit
plan.
The
Company reviews external data and its own historical trends for healthcare costs
to determine the healthcare cost trend rates. Assumed healthcare cost trend
rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported for the healthcare
plans. A 1 percentage point change in assumed healthcare cost trend rates would
have the following effects on December 31, 2009 results (in thousands of
dollars):
|
|
|
1 Percentage
Point
|
|
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
Effect on
total service and interest cost
|
|
$ |
5,278 |
|
|
$ |
(4,100 |
) |
|
Effect on
accumulated postretirement benefit obligations
|
|
|
44,290 |
|
|
|
(34,925 |
) |
The
Company has established a Group Benefit Trust to fund the plan and process
benefit payments. The assets of the Trust are invested entirely in funds
designed to track the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index (S&P 500). This
investment strategy reflects the long-term nature of the plan obligation and
seeks to take advantage of the earnings potential of equity
securities. The plan’s assets are stated at fair value which
represents the net asset value of shares held by the plan in the registered
investment companies at year-end. The following table sets forth by
level within the fair value hierarchy the plan investment assets at the quoted
market price (the level 1 input) as of December 31, 2009 (in thousands of
dollars):
|
|
|
Level
1
|
|
|
Level
2
|
|
|
Level
3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Fair value of
invested assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered
investment companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fidelity
Spartan U.S. Equity Index Fund
|
|
$ |
37,624 |
|
|
$ |
– |
|
|
$ |
– |
|
|
$ |
37,624 |
|
|
Vanguard
500 Index Fund
|
|
|
37,691 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
37,691 |
|
|
Total
Assets
|
|
$ |
75,315 |
|
|
$ |
– |
|
|
$ |
– |
|
|
$ |
75,315 |
|
The
Company uses the long-term historical return on the plan assets and the
historical performance of the S&P 500 to develop its expected return on plan
assets. The required use of an expected long-term rate of return on plan assets
may result in recognizing income that is greater or less than the actual return
on plan assets in any given year. Over time, however, the expected long-term
returns are designed to approximate the actual long-term returns and, therefore,
result in a pattern of income recognition that more closely matches the pattern
of the services provided by the employees.
The
Company’s policies include periodic reviews by management and trustees at least
annually concerning: (1) the allocation of assets among various asset classes
(e.g., domestic stocks, international stocks, short-term bonds, long-term bonds,
etc.); (2) the investment performance of the assets, including performance
comparisons with appropriate benchmarks; (3) investment guidelines and other
matters of investment policy; and (4) the hiring, dismissal, or retention of
investment managers.
The
funding of the trust is an estimated amount which is intended to allow the
maximum deductible contribution under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (IRC),
as amended, and was $9.0 million, $9.4 million and $6.4 million for the years
ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. There are no minimum
funding requirements and the Company intends to follow its practice of funding
the maximum deductible contribution under the IRC.
The
Company forecasts the following benefit payments (which include a projection for
expected future employee service) and subsidy receipts (in thousands of
dollars):
|
|
|
Estimated gross
benefit payments
|
|
|
Estimated
Medicare
subsidy
receipts
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$ |
4,182 |
|
|
$ |
(338 |
) |
|
2011
|
|
|
4,928 |
|
|
|
(402 |
) |
|
2012
|
|
|
5,749 |
|
|
|
(480 |
) |
|
2013
|
|
|
6,798 |
|
|
|
(565 |
) |
|
2014
|
|
|
8,012 |
|
|
|
(666 |
) |
|
2015 – 2019
|
|
|
63,983 |
|
|
|
(5,596 |
) |
Executive
Death Benefit Plan
The
Executive Death Benefit Plan provides one of three potential benefits: a
supplemental income benefit (SIB), an executive death benefit (EDB) or a
postretirement payment. The SIB provides income continuation at 50% of total
compensation, payable for ten years to the beneficiary of a participant if that
participant dies while employed by the Company. Alternatively, the EDB provides
an after-tax lump sum payment of one times final total compensation to the
beneficiary of a participant who dies after retirement. In addition, a
participant may elect to receive a reduced postretirement payment instead of the
EDB. In 2008, new participants to the plan were not eligible for the reduced
postretirement payment option. Effective January 1, 2010, there will be no new
participants added to the plan. There are no plan assets. Benefits are paid as
they come due from the general assets of the Company.
The
net periodic benefits costs charged to operating expenses, which were valued
with a measurement date of January 1 for each year, consisted of the following
components (in thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
For the Years
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Service
cost
|
|
$ |
234 |
|
|
$ |
247 |
|
|
$ |
298 |
|
|
Interest
cost
|
|
|
965 |
|
|
|
880 |
|
|
|
883 |
|
|
Amortization
of unrecognized (gains) losses
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(153 |
) |
|
|
127 |
|
|
Net periodic
benefits costs
|
|
$ |
1,175 |
|
|
$ |
974 |
|
|
$ |
1,308 |
|
Reconciliations of
the beginning and ending balances of the projected benefit obligation, which are
calculated using a December 31 measurement date, follow (in thousands of
dollars):
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Benefit
obligation at beginning of year
|
|
$ |
16,088 |
|
|
$ |
14,115 |
|
|
$ |
14,906 |
|
|
Service
cost
|
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
298 |
|
|
Interest
cost
|
|
|
965 |
|
|
|
880 |
|
|
|
883 |
|
|
Actuarial (gains)
losses
|
|
|
(102 |
) |
|
|
1,425 |
|
|
|
(1,972 |
) |
|
Benefits
paid
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(579 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
|
Benefit
obligation at end of year
|
|
$ |
17,185 |
|
|
$ |
16,088 |
|
|
$ |
14,115 |
|
As
there are no plan assets, the benefits were paid from the general assets of the
Company.
The
amounts recognized as the current and long-term portions of the benefit
obligation follow (in thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
As of December
31,
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Current
liabilities
|
|
$ |
3,081 |
|
|
$ |
552 |
|
|
$ |
739 |
|
|
Noncurrent
liabilities
|
|
|
14,104 |
|
|
|
15,536 |
|
|
|
13,376 |
|
|
Net amounts
recognized
|
|
$ |
17,185 |
|
|
$ |
16,088 |
|
|
$ |
14,115 |
|
Net
gains recognized in Accumulated other comprehensive earnings (losses) were $0.4
million, $0.3 million and $1.9 million as of December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007,
respectively.
The
benefit obligation was determined by applying the terms of the plan and
actuarial models. These models include various actuarial assumptions, including
discount rates, mortality and salary progression. The Company evaluates its
actuarial assumptions on an annual basis and considers changes in these
long-term factors based upon market conditions and historical
experience.
The
following assumptions were used to determine benefit obligations at December
31:
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Discount rate
used to determine net periodic benefit cost
(January 1 valuation)
|
|
|
6.10 |
% |
|
|
6.40 |
% |
|
|
5.90 |
% |
|
Discount rate
used to determine benefit obligation
(December 31
valuation)
|
|
|
5.70 |
% |
|
|
6.10 |
% |
|
|
6.40 |
% |
|
Compensation
increase used to determine obligation and cost
|
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
4.00 |
% |
The
discount rate assumptions reflect the rates available on high-quality fixed
income debt instruments. These rates have been selected due to their similarity
to the projected cash flows of the Executive Death Benefit Plan.
Actuarially
projected future benefit payments are as follows (in thousands of
dollars):
|
|
|
Benefit
Payments
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$ |
3,081 |
|
|
2011
|
|
|
648 |
|
|
2012
|
|
|
855 |
|
|
2013
|
|
|
1,204 |
|
|
2014
|
|
|
1,068 |
|
|
2015 – 2019
|
|
|
5,254 |
|
Deferred
Compensation Plans
The
Executive Deferred Compensation plans are money purchase defined benefit plans.
Plan participation was limited to Company executives during the years 1984 to
1986 and no new executives have been added since that time. Participants were
allowed to defer a portion of their compensation for the years 1984 through
1990. In return, under the plan, each participant receives an individually
specified benefit at age 65. Benefits are reduced when the participant
elects early retirement. There are no plan assets. Benefits are paid as they
come due from the general assets of the Company.
The
net periodic benefits costs charged to operating expenses, which were valued
with a measurement date of January 1 for each year, consisted of the following
components (in thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
For the Years
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Interest
cost
|
|
$ |
524 |
|
|
$ |
543 |
|
|
$ |
568 |
|
|
Amortization
of unrecognized losses
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
Net periodic benefits
costs
|
|
$ |
547 |
|
|
$ |
583 |
|
|
$ |
627 |
|
Reconciliations of
the beginning and ending balances of the projected benefit obligation, which is
calculated using a December 31 measurement date, and the status of the benefit
obligation follow (in thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Benefit
obligation at beginning of year
|
|
$ |
9,333 |
|
|
$ |
10,151 |
|
|
$ |
10,945 |
|
|
Interest
cost
|
|
|
524 |
|
|
|
543 |
|
|
|
568 |
|
|
Actuarial losses
(gains)
|
|
|
628 |
|
|
|
(135 |
) |
|
|
(104 |
) |
|
Benefits
paid
|
|
|
(1,226 |
) |
|
|
(1,226 |
) |
|
|
(1,258 |
) |
|
Benefit
obligation at end of year
|
|
$ |
9,259 |
|
|
$ |
9,333 |
|
|
$ |
10,151 |
|
As
there are no plan assets, the benefits were paid from the general assets of the
Company.
The
amounts recognized as the current and long-term portions of the benefit
obligation follow (in thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
As of December
31,
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Current
liabilities
|
|
$ |
1,196 |
|
|
$ |
1,226 |
|
|
$ |
1,226 |
|
|
Noncurrent
liabilities
|
|
|
8,063 |
|
|
|
8,107 |
|
|
|
8,925 |
|
|
Net amounts
recognized
|
|
$ |
9,259 |
|
|
$ |
9,333 |
|
|
$ |
10,151 |
|
Net
losses recognized in Accumulated other comprehensive earnings (losses) were $0.8
million, $0.2 million and $0.4 million as of December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007,
respectively.
The
net loss that will be amortized from Accumulated other comprehensive earnings
(losses) into net periodic benefit cost in 2010 is $0.1 million.
The
benefit obligation was determined by applying the terms of the plan and
actuarial models. These models include various actuarial assumptions, including
discount rates, mortality and retirement age. The Company evaluates its
actuarial assumptions on an annual basis and considers changes in these
long-term factors based upon market conditions and historical
experience.
The
following assumptions were used to determine benefit obligations at December
31:
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Discount rate
used to determine net periodic benefit cost
(January 1 valuation)
|
|
|
6.00 |
% |
|
|
5.70 |
% |
|
|
5.50 |
% |
|
Discount rate
used to determine benefit obligation
(December 31
valuation)
|
|
|
4.50 |
% |
|
|
6.00 |
% |
|
|
5.70 |
% |
The
discount rate assumptions reflect the rates available on high-quality fixed
income debt instruments. These rates have been selected due to their similarity
to the projected cash flows of the Executive Deferred Compensation
Plans.
Actuarially
projected future benefit payments are as follows (in thousands of
dollars):
|
|
|
Benefit
Payments
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$ |
1,196 |
|
|
2011
|
|
|
1,161 |
|
|
2012
|
|
|
1,154 |
|
|
2013
|
|
|
1,154 |
|
|
2014
|
|
|
1,075 |
|
|
2015 – 2019
|
|
|
4,444 |
|
Other
Employment-Related Benefit Plans
Certain of the
Company’s non-U.S. subsidiaries provide limited non-pension benefits to retirees
in addition to government-mandated programs. The cost of these programs is not
significant to the Company. Most retirees outside the United States are covered
by government-sponsored and -administered programs.
NOTE
11 – LEASES
The
Company leases certain land, buildings and equipment under noncancellable
operating leases that expire at various dates through 2036. The Company
capitalizes all significant leases that qualify for capitalization, of which
there were none at December 31, 2009. Many of the building leases obligate the
Company to pay real estate taxes, insurance and certain maintenance costs, and
contain multiple renewal provisions, exercisable at the Company’s option. Leases
that contain predetermined fixed escalations of the minimum rentals are
recognized in rental expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Cash
or rent abatements received upon entering into certain operating leases are also
recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
At
December 31, 2009, the approximate future minimum lease payments for all
operating leases were as follows (in thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
Future Minimum
Lease Payments
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$ |
42,832 |
|
|
2011
|
|
|
37,187 |
|
|
2012
|
|
|
32,554 |
|
|
2013
|
|
|
28,640 |
|
|
2014
|
|
|
24,260 |
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
51,451 |
|
|
Total minimum
payments required
|
|
|
216,924 |
|
|
Less amounts
representing sublease income
|
|
|
(568 |
) |
|
|
|
$ |
216,356 |
|
Rent expense,
including items under lease and items rented on a month-to-month basis, was
$45.3 million, $44.8 million and $42.1 million for 2009, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. These amounts are net of sublease income of $0.7 million, $0.6
million and $0.5 million for 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
NOTE
12 – STOCK INCENTIVE PLANS
The
Company maintains stock incentive plans under which the Company may grant a
variety of incentive awards to employees and directors. Shares of common stock
were authorized for issuance under the plans in connection with awards of
non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock,
restricted stock units and other stock-based awards. As of December 31, 2009,
restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares, stock units and
non-qualified stock options have been granted.
In
2005, the shareholders of the Company approved the 2005 Incentive
Plan (“Plan”), which replaced all prior active plans (“Prior Plans”).
Awards previously granted under Prior Plans will remain outstanding in
accordance with their terms. A total of 9.5 million shares of common
stock have been reserved for issuance under the Plan. As of December 31, 2009,
there were 1,086,221 shares available for grant under the Plan.
Pre-tax stock-based
compensation expense was $40.7 million, $46.1 million, and $35.7 million in
2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Related income tax benefits
recognized in earnings were $14.1 million, $18.2 million and $11.8 million in
2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Options
In
2009, 2008 and 2007, the Company issued stock option grants to employees as part
of their incentive compensation. Stock option grants were 763,370, 721,600 and
578,120 for the years 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
In
2009, 2008 and 2007, the Company provided broad-based stock option grants
covering 181,100, 161,400 and 162,100 shares, respectively, to those employees
who reached major service milestones and were not participants in other stock
option programs.
Option awards are
granted with an exercise price equal to the closing market price of the
Company’s stock on the last trading day preceding the date of grant. The options
generally vest over three years, although accelerated vesting is provided in
certain circumstances. Awards generally expire ten years from the grant
date.
Transactions
involving stock options are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
Shares Subject
to Option
|
|
|
Weighted
Average Price Per Share
|
|
|
Options
Exercisable
|
|
|
Outstanding at
January 1, 2007
|
|
|
8,454,869 |
|
|
$ |
53.00 |
|
|
|
4,627,249 |
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
740,220 |
|
|
$ |
82.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(2,430,523 |
) |
|
$ |
47.74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canceled or
expired
|
|
|
(236,580 |
) |
|
$ |
67.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
6,527,986 |
|
|
$ |
58.19 |
|
|
|
3,447,856 |
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
883,000 |
|
|
$ |
84.58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(953,199 |
) |
|
$ |
50.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canceled or
expired
|
|
|
(103,920 |
) |
|
$ |
73.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
6,353,867 |
|
|
$ |
62.95 |
|
|
|
3,633,612 |
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
944,470 |
|
|
$ |
79.69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(1,689,581 |
) |
|
$ |
57.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canceled or
expired
|
|
|
(134,160 |
) |
|
$ |
78.98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
5,474,596 |
|
|
$ |
68.07 |
|
|
|
3,141,996 |
|
At
December 31, 2009, there was $12.9 million of total unrecognized compensation
expense related to nonvested option awards, which the Company expects to
recognize over a weighted average period of 1.7 years.
The
following table summarizes information about stock options exercised (in
thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
For the years
ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Fair value of
options exercised
|
|
$ |
24,442 |
|
|
$ |
12,752 |
|
|
$ |
31,736 |
|
|
Total
intrinsic value of options exercised
|
|
|
57,702 |
|
|
|
35,095 |
|
|
|
88,921 |
|
|
Fair value of
options vested
|
|
|
23,303 |
|
|
|
15,510 |
|
|
|
15,996 |
|
|
Settlements of
options exercised
|
|
|
92,213 |
|
|
|
47,016 |
|
|
|
113,752 |
|
Information about
stock options outstanding and exercisable as of December 31, 2009, is as
follows:
| |
|
|
Options
Outstanding
|
|
|
Options
Exercisable
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Range
of
Exercise
Prices
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Remaining
Contractual
Life
|
|
Exercise
Price
|
|
|
Intrinsic
Value
(000’s)
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Remaining
Contractual
Life
|
|
Exercise
Price
|
|
|
Intrinsic
Value
(000’s)
|
|
| |
$37.50 -
$44.05 |
|
|
|
361,165 |
|
1.14
Years
|
|
$ |
40.25 |
|
|
$ |
20,434 |
|
|
|
361,165 |
|
1.14
Years
|
|
$ |
40.25 |
|
|
$ |
20,434 |
|
| |
$45.50 -
$54.85 |
|
|
|
1,763,239 |
|
3.91
Years
|
|
$ |
51.05 |
|
|
|
80,720 |
|
|
|
1,762,179 |
|
3.91
Years
|
|
$ |
51.05 |
|
|
|
80,669 |
|
| |
$56.03 -
$70.67 |
|
|
|
88,422 |
|
5.11
Years
|
|
$ |
61.77 |
|
|
|
3,101 |
|
|
|
88,422 |
|
5.11
Years
|
|
$ |
61.77 |
|
|
|
3,101 |
|
| |
$71.21 -
$93.05 |
|
|
|
3,261,770 |
|
7.85
Years
|
|
$ |
80.52 |
|
|
|
53,199 |
|
|
|
930,230 |
|
6.48
Years
|
|
$ |
76.56 |
|
|
|
18,656 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
5,474,596 |
|
6.09
Years
|
|
$ |
68.07 |
|
|
$ |
157,454 |
|
|
|
3,141,996 |
|
4.39
Years
|
|
$ |
57.66 |
|
|
$ |
122,860 |
|
The
Company uses a binomial lattice option pricing model for the valuation of stock
options. The weighted average fair value of options granted in 2009, 2008 and
2007 was $19.32, $20.82 and $22.92, respectively. The fair value of each option
granted in 2009, 2008 and 2007 used the following assumptions:
|
|
|
For the years
ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Risk-free
interest rate
|
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
|
4.6 |
% |
|
Expected
life
|
|
6
years
|
|
|
6
years
|
|
|
6
years
|
|
|
Expected
volatility
|
|
|
28.8 |
% |
|
|
25.2 |
% |
|
|
24.3 |
% |
|
Expected
dividend yield
|
|
|
2.3 |
% |
|
|
1.8 |
% |
|
|
1.7 |
% |
The
risk-free interest rate is selected based on yields from U.S. Treasury
zero-coupon issues with a remaining term approximately equal to the expected
term of the options being valued. The expected life selected for options granted
during each year presented represents the period of time that the options are
expected to be outstanding based on historical data of option holder exercise
and termination behavior. Expected volatility is based upon implied and
historical volatility of the closing price of the Company’s stock over a period
equal to the expected life of each option grant. Historical company information
is also the primary basis for selection of expected dividend yield
assumptions.
Performance
Shares
The
Company awarded performance-based shares to certain executives. Receipt of
Company stock is contingent upon the Company meeting sales growth and return on
invested capital (ROIC) performance goals. Each participant is granted a base
number of shares. At the end of the performance period, the number of shares
granted will be increased, decreased or remain the same based upon actual
Company-wide sales growth versus target sales growth. The shares, as determined
at the end of the performance year, are issued at the end of the third year if
the Company’s average target ROIC is achieved during the vesting
period.
Performance share
value is based upon closing market prices on the last trading day preceding the
date of award and is charged to earnings on a straight-line basis over the three
year period. Holders of the 2008 and 2007 performance share awards are entitled
to receive cash payments equivalent to cash dividends after the end of the first
year performance period, whereas holders of the 2009 and subsequent performance
share awards are not entitled to receive cash payments equivalent to cash
dividends. If the performance shares vest, they will be settled by
the issuance of Company common stock in exchange for the performance shares on a
one-for-one basis.
The
following table summarizes the transactions involving performance-based share
awards:
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted
Average Price Per Share
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted
Average Price Per Share
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted
Average Price Per Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning nonvested
shares outstanding
|
|
|
117,896 |
|
|
$ |
75.13 |
|
|
|
116,796 |
|
|
$ |
69.49 |
|
|
|
37,812 |
|
|
$ |
71.23 |
|
|
Issuances
|
|
|
36,720 |
|
|
$ |
73.17 |
|
|
|
38,360 |
|
|
$ |
86.00 |
|
|
|
83,089 |
|
|
$ |
68.64 |
|
|
Cancellations
|
|
|
(3,319 |
) |
|
$ |
83.40 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
$ |
– |
|
|
|
(4,105 |
) |
|
$ |
69.00 |
|
|
Vestings
|
|
|
(78,935 |
) |
|
$ |
68.64 |
|
|
|
(37,260 |
) |
|
$ |
71.23 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
$ |
– |
|
|
Ending nonvested
shares
outstanding
|
|
|
72,362 |
|
|
$ |
80.01 |
|
|
|
117,896 |
|
|
$ |
75.13 |
|
|
|
116,796 |
|
|
$ |
69.49 |
|
At
December 31, 2009, the unearned compensation related to performance-based share
awards outstanding was $2.8 million, which the Company expects to recognize over
a weighted average period of 1.7 years.
Restricted
Stock
The
plans authorize the granting of restricted stock, which is held by the Company
pursuant to the terms and conditions related to the applicable grants. Except
for the right of disposal, holders of restricted stock have full shareholders’
rights during the period of restriction, including voting rights and the right
to receive dividends. Restricted stock grants have original vesting periods of
six to ten years.
Compensation expense
related to restricted stock awards is based upon the closing market price on the
last trading day preceding the date of grant and is charged to earnings on a
straight-line basis over the vesting period. The following table summarizes the
transactions involving restricted stock granted to employees:
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted
Average Price Per Share
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted
Average Price Per Share
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted
Average Price Per Share
|
|
|
Beginning nonvested
shares outstanding
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
$ |
53.50 |
|
|
|
65,000 |
|
|
$ |
52.37 |
|
|
|
105,000 |
|
|
$ |
51.05 |
|
|
Vesting
|
|
|
(40,000 |
) |
|
$ |
54.12 |
|
|
|
(15,000 |
) |
|
$ |
48.15 |
|
|
|
(40,000 |
) |
|
$ |
48.73 |
|
|
Ending nonvested
shares outstanding
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
$ |
47.81 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
$ |
53.50 |
|
|
|
65,000 |
|
|
$ |
52.37 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of
shares vested
|
|
$2.9
million
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$1.3
million
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$3.0
million
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted
Stock Units (RSUs)
Awards of RSUs are
provided for under the stock compensation plans. RSUs granted vest over periods
from two to seven years from issuance, although accelerated vesting is provided
in certain instances. Holders of RSUs are entitled to receive cash payments
equivalent to cash dividends and other distributions paid with respect to common
stock. At various times after vesting, RSUs will be settled by the issuance of
stock evidencing the conversion of the RSUs into shares of the Company common
stock on a one-for-one basis. Compensation expense related to RSUs is based upon
the closing market prices on the last trading day preceding the date of award
and is charged to earnings on a straight-line basis over the vesting
period.
The
following table summarizes RSUs activity:
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted
Average Price
Per Share
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted
Average Price
Per Share
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted
Average Price
Per Share
|
|
|
Beginning nonvested
units
|
|
|
1,237,246 |
|
|
$ |
77.88 |
|
|
|
982,568 |
|
|
$ |
72.91 |
|
|
|
740,200 |
|
|
$ |
65.24 |
|
|
Issuances
|
|
|
284,825 |
|
|
$ |
83.10 |
|
|
|
460,423 |
|
|
$ |
84.35 |
|
|
|
421,003 |
|
|
$ |
83.53 |
|
|
Cancellations
|
|
|
(81,572 |
) |
|
$ |
78.47 |
|
|
|
(33,490 |
) |
|
$ |
78.72 |
|
|
|
(74,030 |
) |
|
$ |
71.99 |
|
|
Vestings
|
|
|
(199,135 |
) |
|
$ |
63.57 |
|
|
|
(172,255 |
) |
|
$ |
64.37 |
|
|
|
(104,605 |
) |
|
$ |
75.85 |
|
|
Ending nonvested
units
|
|
|
1,241,364 |
|
|
$ |
80.96 |
|
|
|
1,237,246 |
|
|
$ |
77.88 |
|
|
|
982,568 |
|
|
$ |
72.91 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of
shares vested
|
|
$12.4
million
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$11.1 million
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$7.5
million
|
|
|
|
|
|
At
December 31, 2009, there was $45.5 million of total unrecognized compensation
expense related to nonvested RSUs which the Company expects to recognize over a
weighted average period of 2.5 years.
Director
Stock Awards
The
Company provides members of the Board of Directors with deferred stock unit
grants. A stock unit is the economic equivalent of a share of common stock.
Beginning in April 2008, the number of units covered by each grant is equal to
$100,000 divided by the fair market value of a share of common stock at the time
of the grant, rounded up to the next ten-unit increment. Prior to April 2008,
the number of units covered by each grant was equal to $60,000 divided by the
fair market value of a share of common stock at the time of the grant, rounded
up to the next ten-unit increment. The Company also awards stock units in
connection with elective deferrals of director fees and dividend equivalents
on
existing stock
units. Deferred fees and dividend equivalents on existing stock units are
converted into stock units on the basis of the market value of the stock at the
relevant times. Payment of the value of stock units is scheduled to be made
after termination of service as a director. As of December 31, 2009, 2008 and
2007, there were eleven nonemployee directors who held stock units.
The
Company recognizes (income) expense for the change in value of equivalent stock
units. The following table summarizes activity for stock units related to
deferred director fees (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Units
|
|
|
Dollars
|
|
|
Units
|
|
|
Dollars
|
|
|
Units
|
|
|
Dollars
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
|
93,221 |
|
|
$ |
7,350 |
|
|
|
74,522 |
|
|
$ |
6,522 |
|
|
|
61,242 |
|
|
$ |
4,283 |
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
2,338 |
|
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
1,692 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
1,099 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
Deferred fees
|
|
|
17,950 |
|
|
|
1,463 |
|
|
|
17,007 |
|
|
|
1,460 |
|
|
|
12,181 |
|
|
|
1,012 |
|
|
Unit
appreciation (depreciation)
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
1,986 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(769 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
1,132 |
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
|
113,509 |
|
|
$ |
10,991 |
|
|
|
93,221 |
|
|
$ |
7,350 |
|
|
|
74,522 |
|
|
$ |
6,522 |
|
NOTE
13– CAPITAL STOCK
The
Company had no shares of preferred stock outstanding as of December 31, 2009,
2008 and 2007. The activity of outstanding common stock and common stock held in
treasury was as follows:
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
Common
Stock
|
|
|
Treasury
Stock
|
|
|
Outstanding
Common Stock
|
|
|
Treasury
Stock
|
|
|
Outstanding
Common
Stock
|
|
|
Treasury
Stock
|
|
|
Balance at
beginning of period
|
|
|
74,781,029 |
|
|
|
34,878,190 |
|
|
|
79,459,415 |
|
|
|
30,199,804 |
|
|
|
84,067,627 |
|
|
|
25,590,311 |
|
|
Exercise of
stock options, net of 17,050, 2,725 and 3,318 shares swapped in
stock-for-stock exchange, respectively
|
|
|
1,672,531 |
|
|
|
(1,672,531 |
) |
|
|
950,474 |
|
|
|
(950,474 |
) |
|
|
2,427,205 |
|
|
|
(2,427,205 |
) |
|
Cancellation
of shares related to tax withholdings on restricted stock
vesting
|
|
|
(12,531 |
) |
|
|
12,531 |
|
|
|
(4,874 |
) |
|
|
4,874 |
|
|
|
(14,867 |
) |
|
|
14,867 |
|
|
Settlement of
restricted stock units, net of 67,382, 48,488 and 16,739 shares retained,
respectively
|
|
|
131,753 |
|
|
|
(131,753 |
) |
|
|
101,962 |
|
|
|
(101,962 |
) |
|
|
31,057 |
|
|
|
(29,776 |
) |
|
Settlement of
performance share units, net of 12,172 shares retained
|
|
|
25,088 |
|
|
|
(25,088 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
Purchase of
treasury shares
|
|
|
(4,321,354 |
) |
|
|
4,321,354 |
|
|
|
(5,725,948 |
) |
|
|
5,725,948 |
|
|
|
(7,051,607 |
) |
|
|
7,051,607 |
|
|
Balance at end
of period
|
|
|
72,276,516 |
|
|
|
37,382,703 |
|
|
|
74,781,029 |
|
|
|
34,878,190 |
|
|
|
79,459,415 |
|
|
|
30,199,804 |
|
On
August 20, 2007, the Company entered into an accelerated share repurchase
agreement (ASR) with Goldman, Sachs & Co. (Goldman) to purchase $500
million of its outstanding common stock. The Company paid Goldman $500 million
on August 23, 2007, in exchange for an initial delivery of 5,316,007 shares. The
ASR was treated as an equity transaction. At settlement, the Company was to
receive or pay additional shares of its common stock or cash (at Grainger’s
option), based upon the volume weighted average price during the term of the
agreement. Accordingly, on January 4, 2008, the Company received
415,274 shares of its common stock from Goldman as final settlement of the ASR.
A total of 5,731,281 shares were repurchased under the ASR.
NOTE
14 – ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE EARNINGS
The
following table sets forth the components of Accumulated other comprehensive
earnings (losses) (in thousands of
dollars):
|
|
|
As of December
31,
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Foreign
currency translation adjustments
|
|
$ |
63,304 |
|
|
$ |
3,943 |
|
|
$ |
94,683 |
|
|
Postretirement
benefit plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior
service (cost) credit
|
|
|
(552 |
) |
|
|
9,377 |
|
|
|
10,592 |
|
|
Transition
asset
|
|
|
714 |
|
|
|
857 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
Unrecognized
losses
|
|
|
(66,430 |
) |
|
|
(73,966 |
) |
|
|
(25,405 |
) |
|
Unrecognized
(losses) gains on other employment-related benefit
plans
|
|
|
(827 |
) |
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
1,335 |
|
|
Deferred tax
asset (liability)
|
|
|
14,708 |
|
|
|
21,332 |
|
|
|
(10,034 |
) |
|
Total
accumulated other comprehensive earnings (losses)
|
|
|
10,917 |
|
|
|
(38,525 |
) |
|
|
72,171 |
|
|
Less: Foreign
currency translation adjustments attributable to noncontrolling
interest
|
|
|
(1,457 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
Total
accumulated other comprehensive earnings (losses) attributable to
W.W. Grainger, Inc.
|
|
$ |
12,374 |
|
|
$ |
(38,525 |
) |
|
$ |
72,171 |
|
Foreign currency
translation adjustments result from the translation of assets and liabilities of
foreign subsidiaries. The increase in foreign currency translation adjustments
in 2009 was primarily due to the weakening of the U.S. dollar versus the
Canadian dollar and Mexican peso. In 2008, foreign currency
translation adjustments decreased primarily due to the strengthening of the U.S.
dollar versus these same currencies.
The
decrease in unrecognized losses related to the postretirement benefit
plan in 2009 was primarily due to an increase in the discount rate and an
increase in the return on plan assets, offset by changes in other actuarial
assumptions. The increase in unrecognized losses in 2008 was primarily due to
the impact of a reduction in discount rates and losses on plan
assets.
NOTE
15 – NONCONTROLLING INTEREST
The
following table sets forth the effect on W.W. Grainger Inc.’s equity resulting
from changes in the Company’s ownership interest in MonotaRO Co., Ltd. (in
thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
For the Years
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Net earnings attributable to
W.W. Grainger, Inc.
|
|
$ |
430,466 |
|
|
$ |
475,355 |
|
|
$ |
420,120 |
|
|
Transfers from the
noncontrolling interest:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in W.W. Grainger, Inc.
Additional Contributed Capital for MonotaRO stock option
exercises
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
Change from net earnings
attributable to W.W. Grainger, Inc. and transfer from noncontrolling
interest
|
|
$ |
430,500 |
|
|
$ |
475,355 |
|
|
$ |
420,120 |
|
NOTE
16– INCOME TAXES
The
Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future
tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements
or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are
determined based on the differences between the financial reporting and tax
bases of assets and liabilities, using enacted tax rates in effect for the year
in which the differences are expected to reverse.
Income tax expense
consisted of the following (in thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
For the Years
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Current
provision:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$ |
203,375 |
|
|
$ |
246,731 |
|
|
$ |
238,220 |
|
|
State
|
|
|
36,078 |
|
|
|
39,673 |
|
|
|
42,401 |
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
15,860 |
|
|
|
18,044 |
|
|
|
15,329 |
|
|
Total
current
|
|
|
255,313 |
|
|
|
304,448 |
|
|
|
295,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax
provision (benefit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
16,446 |
|
|
|
(5,968 |
) |
|
|
(28,520 |
) |
|
State
|
|
|
2,894 |
|
|
|
(1,049 |
) |
|
|
(5,013 |
) |
|
Foreign
|
|
|
1,912 |
|
|
|
432 |
|
|
|
(676 |
) |
|
Total
deferred
|
|
|
21,252 |
|
|
|
(6,585 |
) |
|
|
(34,209 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
provision
|
|
$ |
276,565 |
|
|
$ |
297,863 |
|
|
$ |
261,741 |
|
Net
earnings before income taxes by geographical area consisted of the following (in
thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
For the Years
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
United
States
|
|
$ |
679,648 |
|
|
$ |
731,315 |
|
|
$ |
646,762 |
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
27,689 |
|
|
|
41,903 |
|
|
|
35,099 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
707,337 |
|
|
$ |
773,218 |
|
|
$ |
681,861 |
|
The
income tax effects of temporary differences that gave rise to the net deferred
tax asset were (in thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
As of December
31,
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Deferred tax
assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory
|
|
$ |
11,554 |
|
|
$ |
22,674 |
|
|
$ |
19,577 |
|
|
Accrued
expenses
|
|
|
29,262 |
|
|
|
29,966 |
|
|
|
30,295 |
|
|
Accrued employment-related
benefits
|
|
|
163,333 |
|
|
|
144,125 |
|
|
|
111,147 |
|
|
Foreign operating loss
carryforwards
|
|
|
12,547 |
|
|
|
10,833 |
|
|
|
10,239 |
|
|
Property, buildings and
equipment
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
921 |
|
|
|
3,189 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
13,947 |
|
|
|
11,352 |
|
|
|
8,064 |
|
|
Deferred tax
assets
|
|
|
230,643 |
|
|
|
219,871 |
|
|
|
182,511 |
|
|
Less valuation
allowance
|
|
|
(20,810 |
) |
|
|
(15,977 |
) |
|
|
(13,551 |
) |
|
Deferred tax assets, net of
valuation allowance
|
|
$ |
209,833 |
|
|
$ |
203,894 |
|
|
$ |
168,960 |
|
|
Deferred tax
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased tax
benefits
|
|
$ |
(5,178 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,812 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,779 |
) |
|
Property, buildings and
equipment
|
|
|
(7,318 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
Intangibles
|
|
|
(67,821 |
) |
|
|
(17,083 |
) |
|
|
(16,884 |
) |
|
Software
|
|
|
(8,835 |
) |
|
|
(12,774 |
) |
|
|
(9,710 |
) |
|
Prepaids
|
|
|
(22,889 |
) |
|
|
(21,893 |
) |
|
|
(16,625 |
) |
|
Foreign currency
gain
|
|
|
(10,020 |
) |
|
|
(2,206 |
) |
|
|
(13,661 |
) |
|
Deferred tax
liabilities
|
|
|
(122,061 |
) |
|
|
(59,768 |
) |
|
|
(63,659 |
) |
|
Net deferred
tax asset
|
|
$ |
87,772 |
|
|
$ |
144,126 |
|
|
$ |
105,301 |
|
|
The net
deferred tax asset is classified as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
assets
|
|
$ |
42,023 |
|
|
$ |
52,556 |
|
|
$ |
56,663 |
|
|
Noncurrent
assets
|
|
|
79,472 |
|
|
|
97,442 |
|
|
|
54,658 |
|
|
Noncurrent liabilities
(foreign)
|
|
|
(33,723 |
) |
|
|
(5,872 |
) |
|
|
(6,020 |
) |
|
Net deferred
tax asset
|
|
$ |
87,772 |
|
|
$ |
144,126 |
|
|
$ |
105,301 |
|
At
December 31, 2009, the Company had $44.8 million of operating loss carryforwards
related primarily to foreign operations, some of which begin to expire in 2010.
The valuation allowance represents a provision for uncertainty as
to
the
realization of the tax benefits of these carryforwards. In addition, the Company
recorded a valuation allowance to reflect the estimated amount of deferred tax
assets that may not be realized.
The
changes in the valuation allowance were as follows (in thousands of
dollars):
|
|
|
For the Years
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Beginning
balance
|
|
$ |
15,977 |
|
|
$ |
13,551 |
|
|
$ |
13,461 |
|
|
Increase
related to foreign net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
|
4,833 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
1,329 |
|
|
Increase
(decrease) related to capital losses and other
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
2,340 |
|
|
|
(1,239 |
) |
|
Ending
balance
|
|
$ |
20,810 |
|
|
$ |
15,977 |
|
|
$ |
13,551 |
|
A
reconciliation of income tax expense with federal income taxes at the statutory
rate follows (in thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
For the Years
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Federal income
tax at the 35% statutory rate
|
|
$ |
247,568 |
|
|
$ |
270,626 |
|
|
$ |
238,651 |
|
|
State income
taxes, net of federal income tax
benefit
|
|
|
25,332 |
|
|
|
25,105 |
|
|
|
24,302 |
|
|
Other –
net
|
|
|
3,665 |
|
|
|
2,132 |
|
|
|
(1,212 |
) |
|
Income tax
expense
|
|
$ |
276,565 |
|
|
$ |
297,863 |
|
|
$ |
261,741 |
|
|
Effective tax
rate
|
|
|
39.1 |
% |
|
|
38.5 |
% |
|
|
38.4 |
% |
Undistributed
earnings of foreign subsidiaries at December 31, 2009, amounted to $59.2
million. No provision for deferred U.S. income taxes has been made for these
subsidiaries because the Company intends to permanently reinvest such earnings
in those foreign operations.
On
January 1, 2007, the Company adopted the provisions of ASC 740. As a result, the
Company recognized a decrease of approximately $0.9 million in the liability for
tax uncertainties, which resulted in an increase to the January 1, 2007, balance
of Retained earnings.
The
changes in the liability for tax uncertainties, excluding interest, are as
follows (in thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Balance at
beginning of year
|
|
$ |
24,364 |
|
|
$ |
13,568 |
|
|
$ |
15,274 |
|
|
Additions
based on tax positions related to the current year
|
|
|
6,743 |
|
|
|
13,016 |
|
|
|
3,060 |
|
|
Additions for
tax positions of prior years
|
|
|
362 |
|
|
|
735 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
Reductions for
tax positions of prior years
|
|
|
(2,856 |
) |
|
|
(2,900 |
) |
|
|
(4,729 |
) |
|
Reductions due
to statute lapse
|
|
|
(1,961 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
Settlements
(audit payments) refunds – net
|
|
|
(112 |
) |
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
Balance at end
of year
|
|
$ |
26,540 |
|
|
$ |
24,364 |
|
|
$ |
13,568 |
|
The
Company classifies the liability for tax uncertainties in Deferred income taxes
and tax uncertainties. Included in this amount are $8.1 million, $7.4 million
and $3.3 million at December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively, of tax
positions for which the ultimate deductibility is highly certain but for which
there is uncertainty about the timing of such deductibility. Any changes in the
timing of deductibility of these items would not affect the annual effective tax
rate but would accelerate the payment of cash to the taxing authorities to an
earlier period.
The
Company regularly undergoes examination of its federal income tax returns by the
Internal Revenue Service (IRS). Tax years through 2005 are
closed. Although the Company is not currently under examination by
the IRS nor under notice of a pending examination, a recently acquired
subsidiary is under examination for tax year 2008. The Company is also subject
to state and local income tax audits and foreign jurisdiction tax audits. The
Company’s tax years 2002 – 2009 remain subject to state and local audits. Tax
years 2004 – 2009 remain open to foreign audits. Two of the Company’s foreign
subsidiaries are currently under audit. The estimated amount of
liability associated with the Company’s uncertain tax positions may decrease
within the next twelve months due to expiring statutes, tax payments or audit
activity.
The
Company recognizes interest expense in the provision for income taxes. During
2009, the Company recognized a benefit of $0.5 million for
interest. During 2008 and 2007, the Company recognized interest of
$0.8 million and $0.7 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2009, 2008 and
2007, respectively, the Company accrued $1.4 million, $1.9 million and $1.1
million for interest.
NOTE
17 – EARNINGS PER SHARE
In
June 2008, the FASB issued authoritative guidance which states that unvested
share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or
dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and
shall be included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the
two-class method.
Effective January 1,
2009, the Company adopted the authoritative guidance. The Company’s
unvested share-based payment awards, such as certain Performance Shares,
Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units that contain nonforfeitable rights
to dividends, meet the criteria of a participating security. The
adoption has changed the methodology of computing the Company’s earnings per
share to the two-class method from the treasury stock method. As a
result, the Company has restated previously reported earnings per
share. This change has not affected previously reported consolidated
net earnings or net cash flows from operations. Under the two-class
method, earnings are allocated between common stock and participating
securities. Under the authoritative guidance the presentation of
basic and diluted earnings per share is required only for each class of common
stock and not for participating securities. As such, the Company will
present basic and diluted earnings per share for its one class of common
stock.
The
two-class method includes an earnings allocation formula that determines
earnings per share for each class of common stock according to dividends
declared and undistributed earnings for the period. The Company’s
reported net earnings is reduced by the amount allocated to participating
securities to arrive at the earnings allocated to common stock shareholders for
purposes of calculating earnings per share.
The
dilutive effect of participating securities is calculated using the more
dilutive of the treasury stock or the two-class method. The Company
has determined the two-class method to be the more dilutive. As such,
the earnings allocated to common stock shareholders in the basic earnings per
share calculation is adjusted for the reallocation of undistributed earnings to
participating securities as prescribed by the authoritative guidance to arrive
at the earnings allocated to common stock shareholders for calculating the
diluted earnings per share.
The
Company had additional outstanding stock options of 2.6 million for the year
ended December 31, 2008 that were excluded from the computation of diluted
earnings per share because the options’ exercise price was greater than the
average market price of the common stock.
The
following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per
share under the two-class method (in thousands of dollars, except for share and
per share amounts):
|
|
|
For the Years
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Net earnings
attributable to W.W. Grainger, Inc. as reported
|
|
$ |
430,466 |
|
|
$ |
475,355 |
|
|
$ |
420,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less:
Distributed earnings available to participating securities
|
|
|
(2,990 |
) |
|
|
(2,560 |
) |
|
|
(1,707 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less:
Undistributed earnings available to participating
securities
|
|
|
(7,059 |
) |
|
|
(7,935 |
) |
|
|
(5,428 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator for
basic earnings per share –
Undistributed
and distributed earnings available to common shareholders
|
|
|
420,417 |
|
|
|
464,860 |
|
|
|
412,985 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add:
Undistributed earnings allocated to participating
securities
|
|
|
7,059 |
|
|
|
7,935 |
|
|
|
5,428 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less:
Undistributed earnings reallocated to participating
securities
|
|
|
(6,957 |
) |
|
|
(7,804 |
) |
|
|
(5,316 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator for
diluted earnings per share –
Undistributed
and distributed earnings available to common shareholders
|
|
$ |
420,519 |
|
|
$ |
464,991 |
|
|
$ |
413,097 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator
for basic earnings per share – weighted average shares
|
|
|
73,786,346 |
|
|
|
76,579,856 |
|
|
|
82,403,958 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of
dilutive securities
|
|
|
1,105,506 |
|
|
|
1,307,764 |
|
|
|
1,769,423 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator
for diluted earnings per share – weighted average shares adjusted for
dilutive securities
|
|
|
74,891,852 |
|
|
|
77,887,620 |
|
|
|
84,173,381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per
share Two-class method
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
5.70 |
|
|
$ |
6.07 |
|
|
$ |
5.01 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
5.62 |
|
|
$ |
5.97 |
|
|
$ |
4.91 |
|
NOTE
18 – SEGMENT INFORMATION
Effective January 1,
2009, the Company revised its segment disclosure. The Company has two
reportable segments: the United States and Canada. In the
first quarter of 2009, the Company integrated the Lab Safety Supply business
into the Grainger Industrial Supply business and results are now reported under
the United States segment. The Canada segment reflects the results
for Acklands – Grainger Inc., the Company’s Canadian branch-based distribution
business. Other Businesses include the following: MonotaRO
Co., Ltd. (Japan), Grainger, S.A. de C.V. (Mexico), Grainger Industrial Supply
India Private Limited (India), Grainger Caribe Inc. (Puerto Rico), Grainger
China LLC (China) and Grainger Panama S.A. (Panama). These businesses
generate revenue through the distribution of facilities maintenance
products. Prior year segment amounts have been restated in a
consistent manner.
The
accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the
summary of significant accounting policies. Intersegment transfer prices are
established at external selling prices, less costs not incurred due to a related
party sale.
Following is a
summary of segment results (in thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
United
States
|
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
Other
Businesses
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Total net
sales
|
|
$ |
5,445,390 |
|
|
$ |
651,166 |
|
|
$ |
165,051 |
|
|
$ |
6,261,607 |
|
|
Intersegment
net sales
|
|
|
(39,057 |
) |
|
|
(154 |
) |
|
|
(405 |
) |
|
|
(39,616 |
) |
|
Net sales to
external customers
|
|
|
5,406,333 |
|
|
|
651,012 |
|
|
|
164,646 |
|
|
|
6,221,991 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment
operating earnings (losses)
|
|
|
735,586 |
|
|
|
43,742 |
|
|
|
(11,634 |
) |
|
|
767,694 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment
assets
|
|
|
2,281,731 |
|
|
|
545,866 |
|
|
|
333,955 |
|
|
|
3,161,552 |
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
|
117,821 |
|
|
|
10,769 |
|
|
|
6,593 |
|
|
|
135,183 |
|
|
Additions to
long-lived assets
|
|
$ |
219,393 |
|
|
$ |
15,680 |
|
|
$ |
134,650 |
|
|
$ |
369,723 |
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
United
States
|
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
Other
Businesses
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Total net
sales
|
|
$ |
6,057,828 |
|
|
$ |
727,989 |
|
|
$ |
111,732 |
|
|
$ |
6,897,549 |
|
|
Intersegment
net sales
|
|
|
(46,992 |
) |
|
|
(127 |
) |
|
|
(398 |
) |
|
|
(47,517 |
) |
|
Net sales to
external customers
|
|
|
6,010,836 |
|
|
|
727,862 |
|
|
|
111,334 |
|
|
|
6,850,032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment
operating earnings (losses)
|
|
|
840,408 |
|
|
|
54,263 |
|
|
|
(11,827 |
) |
|
|
882,844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment
assets
|
|
|
2,310,484 |
|
|
|
448,660 |
|
|
|
133,111 |
|
|
|
2,892,255 |
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
|
112,126 |
|
|
|
10,506 |
|
|
|
4,574 |
|
|
|
127,206 |
|
|
Additions to
long-lived assets
|
|
$ |
149,675 |
|
|
$ |
24,337 |
|
|
$ |
32,469 |
|
|
$ |
206,481 |
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
United
States
|
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
Other
Businesses
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Total net
sales
|
|
$ |
5,729,327 |
|
|
$ |
636,524 |
|
|
$ |
93,516 |
|
|
$ |
6,459,367 |
|
|
Intersegment
net sales
|
|
|
(41,160 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(193 |
) |
|
|
(41,353 |
) |
|
Net sales to
external customers
|
|
|
5,688,167 |
|
|
|
636,524 |
|
|
|
93,323 |
|
|
|
6,418,014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment
operating earnings (losses)
|
|
|
731,553 |
|
|
|
44,218 |
|
|
|
(7,495 |
) |
|
|
768,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment
assets
|
|
|
2,250,266 |
|
|
|
502,414 |
|
|
|
71,139 |
|
|
|
2,823,819 |
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
|
106,744 |
|
|
|
10,786 |
|
|
|
2,464 |
|
|
|
119,994 |
|
|
Additions to
long-lived assets
|
|
$ |
149,009 |
|
|
$ |
10,794 |
|
|
$ |
14,771 |
|
|
$ |
174,574 |
|
Following are
reconciliations of the segment information with the consolidated totals per the
financial statements (in thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Operating
earnings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
operating earnings for reportable segments
|
|
$ |
767,694 |
|
|
$ |
882,844 |
|
|
$ |
768,276 |
|
|
Unallocated
expenses
|
|
|
(102,470 |
) |
|
|
(100,172 |
) |
|
|
(97,623 |
) |
|
Total consolidated operating
earnings
|
|
$ |
665,224 |
|
|
$ |
782,672 |
|
|
$ |
670,653 |
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
for reportable segments
|
|
$ |
3,161,552 |
|
|
$ |
2,892,255 |
|
|
$ |
2,823,819 |
|
|
Unallocated
assets
|
|
|
564,780 |
|
|
|
623,162 |
|
|
|
270,209 |
|
|
Total consolidated
assets
|
|
$ |
3,726,332 |
|
|
$ |
3,515,417 |
|
|
$ |
3,094,028 |
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
Segment
Totals
|
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
|
Consolidated
Total
|
|
|
Other
significant items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
$ |
135,183 |
|
|
$ |
12,348 |
|
|
$ |
147,531 |
|
|
Additions to
long-lived assets
|
|
$ |
369,723 |
|
|
$ |
2,618 |
|
|
$ |
372,341 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
Long-lived
Assets
|
|
|
Geographic
information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,362,729 |
|
|
$ |
1,080,053 |
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
653,984 |
|
|
|
213,962 |
|
|
Other foreign
countries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
205,278 |
|
|
|
177,503 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,221,991 |
|
|
$ |
1,471,518 |
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
Segment
Totals
|
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
|
Consolidated
Total
|
|
|
Other
significant items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
$ |
127,206 |
|
|
$ |
12,364 |
|
|
$ |
139,570 |
|
|
Additions to
long-lived assets
|
|
$ |
206,481 |
|
|
$ |
7,508 |
|
|
$ |
213,989 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
Long-lived
Assets
|
|
|
Geographic
information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,953,205 |
|
|
$ |
998,529 |
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
731,131 |
|
|
|
176,174 |
|
|
Other foreign
countries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
165,696 |
|
|
|
41,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,850,032 |
|
|
$ |
1,215,920 |
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Segment
Totals
|
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
|
Consolidated
Total
|
|
|
Other
significant items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
$ |
119,994 |
|
|
$ |
12,005 |
|
|
$ |
131,999 |
|
|
Additions to
long-lived assets
|
|
$ |
174,574 |
|
|
$ |
25,558 |
|
|
$ |
200,132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
Long-lived
Assets
|
|
|
Geographic
information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,643,500 |
|
|
$ |
961,624 |
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
640,121 |
|
|
|
206,133 |
|
|
Other foreign
countries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134,393 |
|
|
|
20,135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,418,014 |
|
|
$ |
1,187,892 |
|
Long-lived assets
consist of property, buildings, equipment, capitalized software, goodwill and
other intangibles.
Revenues are
attributed to countries based on the ship-to location of the
customer.
Unallocated expenses
and unallocated assets primarily relate to the Company headquarters’ support
services, which are not part of any business segment. Unallocated expenses
include payroll and benefits, depreciation and other costs associated with
headquarters-related support services. Unallocated assets include non-operating
cash and cash equivalents, certain prepaid expenses and property, buildings and
equipment – net.
The
change in the carrying amount of goodwill by segment from January 1, 2007 to
December 31, 2009, is as follows (in thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
United
States
|
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
Other
Businesses
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance at
January 1, 2007
|
|
$ |
90,223 |
|
|
$ |
120,448 |
|
|
$ |
– |
|
|
$ |
210,671 |
|
|
Acquisition
|
|
|
1,473 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
1,473 |
|
|
Translation
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
20,884 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
20,884 |
|
|
Balance at
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
91,696 |
|
|
|
141,332 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
233,028 |
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
2,372 |
|
|
|
4,381 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
6,753 |
|
|
Translation
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(26,622 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(26,622 |
) |
|
Balance at
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
94,068 |
|
|
|
119,091 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
213,159 |
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
62,361 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
58,191 |
|
|
|
120,619 |
|
|
Translation
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
18,748 |
|
|
|
(1,344 |
) |
|
|
17,404 |
|
|
Balance at
December 31, 2009
|
|
$ |
156,429 |
|
|
$ |
137,906 |
|
|
$ |
56,847 |
|
|
$ |
351,182 |
|
NOTE
19 – SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
A
summary of selected quarterly information for 2009 and 2008 is as follows (in
thousands of dollars, except for per share amounts):
|
|
|
2009 Quarter
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
March
31
|
|
|
June
30
|
|
|
September
30
|
|
|
December
31
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$ |
1,465,248 |
|
|
$ |
1,533,263 |
|
|
$ |
1,589,665 |
|
|
$ |
1,633,815 |
|
|
$ |
6,221,991 |
|
|
Cost of merchandise sold
|
|
|
835,833 |
|
|
|
908,295 |
|
|
|
929,720 |
|
|
|
949,617 |
|
|
|
3,623,465 |
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
629,415 |
|
|
|
624,968 |
|
|
|
659,945 |
|
|
|
684,198 |
|
|
|
2,598,526 |
|
|
Warehousing, marketing and
administrative expenses
|
|
|
470,201 |
|
|
|
471,039 |
|
|
|
473,225 |
|
|
|
518,837 |
|
|
|
1,933,302 |
|
|
Operating earnings
|
|
|
159,214 |
|
|
|
153,929 |
|
|
|
186,720 |
|
|
|
165,361 |
|
|
|
665,224 |
|
|
Net earnings
attributable to W.W. Grainger, Inc.
|
|
|
96,378 |
|
|
|
92,466 |
|
|
|
144,564 |
|
|
|
97,058 |
|
|
|
430,466 |
|
|
Earnings per share - basic
|
|
|
1.27 |
|
|
|
1.23 |
|
|
|
1.91 |
|
|
|
1.29 |
|
|
|
5.70 |
|
|
Earnings per share - diluted
|
|
$ |
1.25 |
|
|
$ |
1.21 |
|
|
$ |
1.88 |
|
|
$ |
1.27 |
|
|
$ |
5.62 |
|
|
|
|
2008 Quarter
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
March
31
|
|
|
June
30
|
|
|
September
30
|
|
|
December
31
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$ |
1,661,046 |
|
|
$ |
1,756,856 |
|
|
$ |
1,839,475 |
|
|
$ |
1,592,655 |
|
|
$ |
6,850,032 |
|
|
Cost of merchandise sold
|
|
|
981,112 |
|
|
|
1,050,979 |
|
|
|
1,097,127 |
|
|
|
912,592 |
|
|
|
4,041,810 |
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
679,934 |
|
|
|
705,877 |
|
|
|
742,348 |
|
|
|
680,063 |
|
|
|
2,808,222 |
|
|
Warehousing, marketing and
administrative expenses
|
|
|
494,111 |
|
|
|
521,042 |
|
|
|
510,891 |
|
|
|
499,506 |
|
|
|
2,025,550 |
|
|
Operating earnings
|
|
|
185,823 |
|
|
|
184,835 |
|
|
|
231,457 |
|
|
|
180,557 |
|
|
|
782,672 |
|
|
Net earnings
attributable to W.W. Grainger, Inc.
|
|
|
114,238 |
|
|
|
113,179 |
|
|
|
140,023 |
|
|
|
107,915 |
|
|
|
475,355 |
|
|
Earnings per share - basic
|
|
|
1.44 |
|
|
|
1.44 |
|
|
|
1.80 |
|
|
|
1.39 |
|
|
|
6.07 |
|
|
Earnings per share - diluted
|
|
$ |
1.41 |
|
|
$ |
1.42 |
|
|
$ |
1.77 |
|
|
$ |
1.37 |
|
|
$ |
5.97 |
|
NOTE
20 – CONTINGENCIES AND LEGAL MATTERS
The
Company has been named, along with numerous other nonaffiliated companies, as a
defendant in litigation in various states involving asbestos and/or silica.
These lawsuits typically assert claims of personal injury arising from alleged
exposure to asbestos and/or silica as a consequence of products purportedly
distributed by the Company. As of February 2, 2010, the Company is named in
cases filed on behalf of approximately 1,900 plaintiffs in which there is an
allegation of exposure to asbestos and/or silica. The Company has
denied, or intends to deny, the allegations in all of the above-described
lawsuits.
In
2009, lawsuits relating to asbestos and/or silica and involving approximately
470 plaintiffs were dismissed with respect to the Company, typically based on
the lack of product identification. If a specific product distributed by the
Company is identified in any of these lawsuits, The Company would attempt to
exercise indemnification remedies against the product manufacturer. In addition,
the Company believes that a substantial number of these claims are covered by
insurance. The Company has entered agreements with its major
insurance carriers relating to the scope, coverage and costs of
defense. While the Company is unable to predict the outcome of these
lawsuits, it believes that the ultimate resolution will not have, either
individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse effect on the Company’s
consolidated financial position or results of operations.
The
Company is a party to a contract with the United States General Services
Administration (the “GSA”) first entered into in 1999 and subsequently extended
in 2004. The GSA contract had been the subject of an audit performed
by the GSA’s Office of the Inspector General. In December 2007, the
Company received a letter from the Commercial Litigation Branch of the Civil
Division of the Department of Justice (the “DOJ”) regarding the GSA contract.
The letter suggested that the Company had not complied with its disclosure
obligations and the contract’s pricing provisions, and had potentially
overcharged government customers under the contract.
Discussions relating
to the Company’s compliance with its disclosure obligations and the contract’s
pricing provisions are ongoing. The timing and outcome of these
discussions are uncertain and could include settlement or civil litigation by
the DOJ to recover, among other amounts, treble damages and penalties under the
False Claims Act. While this matter is not expected to have a
material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, an unfavorable
resolution could result in significant payments by the Company. The
Company continues to believe that it has complied with the GSA contract in all
material respects.
The
Company is a party to a contract with the United States Postal Service (the
“USPS”) entered into in 2003 covering the sale of certain Maintenance Repair and
Operating Supplies (the “MRO Contract”). The Company received a
subpoena dated August 29, 2008, from the USPS Office of Inspector General
seeking information about the Company’s pricing compliance under the MRO
Contract. The Company has provided responsive information to the USPS
but no substantive discussions have yet begun.
The
Company is also a party to a contract with the USPS entered into in 2001
covering the sale of certain janitorial and custodial items (the “Custodial
Contract”). The Company received a subpoena dated June 30, 2009, from
the USPS Office of Inspector General seeking information about the Company’s
pricing practices and compliance under the Custodial Contract. The
Company has provided responsive information to the USPS but no substantive
discussions have yet begun.
The
timing and outcome of the USPS investigations of the MRO Contract and the
Custodial Contract are uncertain and could include settlement or civil
litigation by the USPS to recover, among other amounts treble damages and
penalties under the False Claims Act. While these matters are not
expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position,
an unfavorable resolution could result in significant payments by the
Company. The Company continues to believe that it has complied with
each of the MRO Contract and the Custodial Contract in all material
respects.
In
addition to the foregoing, from time to time the Company is involved in various
other legal and administrative proceedings that are incidental to its business,
including claims relating to product liability, premises liability, general
negligence, environmental issues, employment, intellectual property and other
matters. As a government contractor selling to Federal, state and local
governmental entities, the Company is also subject to governmental or regulatory
inquiries or audits or other proceedings, including those related to pricing
compliance. It is not expected that the ultimate resolution of any of these
matters will have, either individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse
effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of
operations.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the
requirements of Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Grainger has
duly issued this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
DATE: February
25, 2010
|
W.W. GRAINGER,
INC.
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/
James T. Ryan
|
|
|
James T. Ryan
Chairman,
President and
Chief Executive Officer
|
Pursuant to the
requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been
signed below by the following persons on behalf of Grainger on February 25,
2010, in the capacities indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
James T. Ryan
|
|
/s/
William K. Hall
|
|
James T.
Ryan
|
|
William K.
Hall
|
|
Chairman,
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
Director
|
|
(Principal
Executive Officer and Director)
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
Stuart L. Levenick
|
|
/s/
Ronald L. Jadin
|
|
Stuart L.
Levenick
|
|
Ronald L.
Jadin
|
|
Director
|
|
Senior Vice
President
|
|
|
|
and Chief
Financial Officer
|
|
/s/
John W. McCarter, Jr.
|
|
(Principal
Financial Officer)
|
|
John W.
McCarter, Jr.
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
/s/
Gregory S. Irving
|
|
|
|
Gregory S.
Irving
|
|
/s/
Neil S. Novich
|
|
Vice President
and Controller
|
|
Neil S.
Novich
|
|
(Principal
Accounting Officer)
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
Richard L. Keyser
|
|
/s/
Michael J. Roberts
|
|
Richard L.
Keyser
|
|
Michael J.
Roberts
|
|
Chairman
Emeritus
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
Brian P. Anderson
|
|
/s/
Gary L. Rogers
|
|
Brian P.
Anderson
|
|
Gary L.
Rogers
|
|
Director
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
Wilbur H. Gantz
|
|
/s/
James D. Slavik
|
|
Wilbur H.
Gantz
|
|
James D.
Slavik
|
|
Director
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
V. Ann Hailey
|
|
/s/
Harold B. Smith
|
|
V. Ann
Hailey
|
|
Harold B.
Smith
|
|
Director
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
21
W.W.
GRAINGER, INC.
Subsidiaries as of
February 8, 2010
Acklands - Grainger
Inc. (Canada)
Dayton Electric
Manufacturing Co. (Illinois)
Grainger Caribe,
Inc. (Illinois)
Grainger
International, Inc. (Illinois)
- Grainger
Global Holdings, Inc. (Delaware)
- Grainger
China LLC (China)
- Grainger
Global Trading (Shanghai) Company Limited (China)
- Grainger
India Private Limited (India)
- Grainger
Panama S.A. (Panama)
- Grainger
Services International Inc. (Illinois)
- MRO
Korea Co., Ltd. (Korea) (49% owned)
- MonotaRO
Co., Ltd. (Japan) (47.9% owned)*
- ProQuest
Brands, Inc. (Illinois)
- WWG
de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. (Mexico)
- Grainger,
S.A. de C.V. (Mexico)
- MRO
Soluciones, S.A. de C.V. (Mexico)
- WWG
Servicios, S.A. de C.V. (Mexico)
Grainger Japan
Holdings, Inc. (Delaware)
- Grainger
Japan, Inc. (Deleware)
- MonotaRO
Co., Ltd. (Japan) (5% owned)*
Grainger Service
Holding Company, Inc. (Delaware)
Grainger Worldwide
Holdings, Inc. (Delaware)
- India
Pacific Brands (Mauritius)
- Grainger
Industrial Supply India Private Limited (India)
Imperial Supplies
Holdings, Inc. (Delaware)
- Imperial
Supplies LLC (Delaware)
- Imperial
Logistics LLC (Wisconsin)
GHC Specialty
Brands, LLC (Wisconsin)
*W.W. Grainger, Inc. owns a total of
52.9% of MonotaRO Co., Ltd. (Japan)
Exhibit
23
CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No.’s
33-43902, 333-24215, 333-61980, 333-105185, 333-124356 and Form S-4 No.
33-32091) of W.W. Grainger, Inc. and in the related prospectuses of our reports
dated February 25, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statements
of W.W. Grainger, Inc. and the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting of W.W. Grainger, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for
the year ended December 31, 2009.
/s/ ERNST & YOUNG
LLP
Chicago,
Illinois
February 25,
2010
1
CERTIFICATION
Exhibit
31(a)
I,
J. T. Ryan, certify that:
|
1.
|
I have
reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of W.W. Grainger,
Inc.;
|
|
2.
|
Based on my
knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;
|
|
3.
|
Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
|
|
4.
|
The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal
control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
|
|
|
a)
|
Designed such
disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
|
|
|
b)
|
Designed such
internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and
the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;
|
|
|
c)
|
Evaluated the
effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and
|
|
|
d)
|
Disclosed in
this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;
and
|
|
5.
|
The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
|
|
|
a)
|
All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information;
and
|
|
|
b)
|
Any fraud,
whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting.
|
Date: February 25,
2010
|
By:
|
/s/ J. T.
Ryan
|
|
Name:
|
J. T.
Ryan
|
|
Title:
|
Chairman,
President and Chief Executive
Officer
|
CERTIFICATION
Exhibit
31(b)
I,
R. L. Jadin, certify that:
|
1.
|
I have
reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of W.W. Grainger,
Inc.;
|
|
2.
|
Based on my
knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;
|
|
3.
|
Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
|
|
4.
|
The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal
control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
|
|
|
a)
|
Designed such
disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
|
|
|
b)
|
Designed such
internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and
the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;
|
|
|
c)
|
Evaluated the
effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and
|
|
|
d)
|
Disclosed in
this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;
and
|
|
5.
|
The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
|
|
|
a)
|
All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information;
and
|
|
|
b)
|
Any fraud,
whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting.
|
Date: February 25,
2010
|
By:
|
/s/ R. L.
Jadin
|
|
Name:
|
R. L.
Jadin
|
|
Title:
|
Senior Vice
President and Chief Financial
Officer
|
Exhibit
32(a)
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I,
J. T. Ryan, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of
W.W. Grainger, Inc. (“Grainger”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:
|
1.
|
The Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Grainger for the annual period ended December 31,
2009, (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
|
|
2.
|
The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Grainger.
|
|
/s/ J. T.
Ryan
|
|
|
J. T.
Ryan
|
|
|
Chairman,
President and
Chief
Executive Oficer
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 25,
2010
|
|
Exhibit
32(b)
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I,
R. L. Jadin, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
W.W. Grainger, Inc. (“Grainger”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:
|
1.
|
The Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Grainger for the annual period ended December 31,
2009, (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
|
|
2.
|
The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Grainger.
|
|
/s/ R. L.
Jadin
|
|
|
R. L.
Jadin
|
|
|
Senior Vice
President
and Chief
Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 25,
2010
|
|
Exhibit
10b (iv)2
SECOND AMENDMENT
OF
W.W. GRAINGER, INC.
EXECUTIVE DEATH BENEFIT PLAN
(As Amended and
Restated Effective as of January 1, 2008)
WHEREAS, W.W. Grainger, Inc. (the
“Corporation”) maintains the W.W. Grainger, Inc. Executive Death Benefit Plan
(the “Plan”); and
WHEREAS, the Plan was amended and restated in
its entirety effective as of January 1, 2008, and was further amended by a First
Amendment thereto; and
WHEREAS, further amendment of the Plan is now
deemed desirable;
NOW THEREFORE, by virtue of the power reserved
to the Corporation under Section 8.1 of the Plan, and pursuant to a resolution
adopted by the Board of Directors on February 17, 2010, the Plan is hereby
amended in the following particulars:
1. Section
3.1 of the Plan is amended to add the following sentence at the end thereof to
read as follows:
No Employee shall
become eligible to be a Participant on or after January 1, 2010.
2. Section
3.2 of the Plan is amended to add the following sentence at the end thereof to
read as follows:
No re-employed
former Participant shall have renewed eligibility to participate in the Plan on
or after January 1, 2010.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused
this amendment to be signed and attested by its duly authorized officers as of
the 17th day of February, 2010.
W.W. GRAINGER, INC.
By: _________________________
Title: ________________________
Attest:
________________________
Exhibit
10b (ix)
CHANGE
IN CONTROL EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
(Senior
Executive)
AGREEMENT by and between W.W. Grainger, Inc.,
an Illinois corporation (the “Company”), and INSERT
NAME (“Executive”), dated
as _____________________(the “Agreement
Date”).
Recitals
A. The Board of Directors of the
Company (the “Board”) has
determined that it is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders
to assure that the Company will have the continued dedication of Executive,
notwithstanding the possibility, threat, or occurrence of a Change in Control
(as defined below) of the Company.
B. The Board believes it is
imperative to diminish the inevitable distraction of Executive by virtue of the
personal uncertainties and risks created by a pending or threatened Change in
Control, to encourage Executive's full attention and dedication to the Company,
and to provide Executive with compensation and benefits arrangements upon a
Change in Control which (i) will satisfy Executive's compensation and
benefits expectations and (ii) are competitive with those of other major
corporations.
Agreement
In consideration of the mutual agreements
contained herein, and of certain other commitments separately made by the
Executive to the Company concerning the Company's competitors, the protection of
the Company's confidential information, and the non-solicitation of the
Company's customers and employees, the Company and Executive hereby agree as
follows:
1. Certain
Definitions. The terms set forth below in alphabetical order
have the following meanings (such meanings to be applicable to both the singular
and plural forms):
“Accrued Annual Bonus”
means the amount of any annual bonus accrued but not yet paid with respect to
each fiscal year of the Company ended prior to the Date of
Termination.
“Accrued Base Salary”
means the amount of Executive's Annual Base Salary which is accrued but not yet
paid as of the Date of Termination.
“Accrued Obligations”
-- see Section 4(a)(i)(A).
“Agreement Term” means
the period commencing on the Agreement Date and ending on the third anniversary
of such date or, if later, such later date to which the Agreement Term is
extended pursuant to the following sentence. On each day after the
second anniversary of the Agreement Date, the Agreement Term shall be
automatically extended by one day to create a new one-year term until, at any
time on or after the second anniversary of the Agreement Date, the Company
delivers a written notice (an “Expiration Notice”)
to Executive stating that this Agreement shall expire on a date specified in the
Expiration Notice (the “Expiration Date”)
that is at least 12 months after the date the Expiration Notice is delivered to
Executive; provided, however, that if a Change in Control occurs before the
Expiration Date specified in an Expiration Notice, then (a) such Expiration
Notice shall automatically be cancelled and of no further effect and (b) the
Company shall not give Executive any additional Expiration Notice prior to the
date which is 24 months after the Effective Date.
“Annual Base Salary”
-- see Section 2(b)(i).
“Annual Bonus” -- see
Section 2(b)(ii).
“Average Profit Sharing Plan
Contribution” -- see Section 2(b)(iii).
“Cause” -- see Section
3(b).
“Change in Control”
means any one or more of the following events:
(a) the consummation
of:
|
|
(i) any
merger, reorganization or consolidation of the Company or any Subsidiary
with or into any corporation or other Person if Persons who were the
beneficial owners (as such term is used in Rule 13d-3 under the Act) of
the Company’s Common Stock and securities of the Company entitled to vote
generally in the election of directors (“Voting
Securities”) immediately before such merger, reorganization or
consolidation are not, immediately thereafter, the beneficially owners,
directly or indirectly, of at least 60% of the then-outstanding common
shares and the combined voting power of the then-outstanding Voting
Securities (“Voting Power”)
of the corporation or other Person surviving or resulting from such
merger, reorganization or consolidation (or the parent corporation
thereof) in substantially the same respective proportions as their
beneficial ownership, immediately before the consummation of such merger,
reorganization or consolidation, of the then-outstanding Common Stock and
Voting Power of the Company; or
|
|
|
(ii) the
sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of the consolidated
assets of the Company, other than a sale or other disposition by the
Company of all or substantially all of its consolidated assets to an
entity of which at least 60% of the common shares and the Voting Power
outstanding
|
immediately after
such sale or other disposition are then beneficially owned (as such term is used
in Rule 13d-3 under the Act) by shareholders of the Company in substantially the
same respective proportions as their beneficial ownership of Common Stock and
Voting Power of the Company immediately before the consummation of such sale or
other disposition; or
(b) approval by the shareholders of
the Company of a liquidation or dissolution of the Company; or
(c) the following individuals cease
for any reason to constitute a majority of the directors of the Company then
serving: individuals who, on the Agreement Date, constitute the Board and any
subsequently-appointed or elected director of the Company whose appointment or
election by the Board or nomination for election by the Company's shareholders
was approved or recommended by a vote of at least two-thirds of the Company’s
directors then in office whose appointment, election or nomination for election
was previously so approved or recommended or who were directors on the Agreement
Date; or
(d) the acquisition or holding by
any person, entity or “group” (within the meaning of Section 13(d)(3) or
14(d)(2) of the Act), other than by any Exempt Person, the Company, any
Subsidiary, any employee benefit plan of the Company or a Subsidiary, of
beneficial ownership (as such term is used in Rule 13d-3 under the Act) of 20%
or more of either the Company’s then-outstanding Common Stock or Voting Power;
provided
that:
|
|
(i) no
such person, entity or group shall be deemed to own beneficially any
securities held by the Company or a Subsidiary or any employee benefit
plan (or any related trust) of the Company or a
Subsidiary;
|
|
|
(ii) no
Change in Control shall be deemed to have occurred solely by reason of any
such acquisition if both (x) after giving effect to acquisition, such
person, entity or group has beneficial ownership of less than 30% of the
then-outstanding Common Stock and Voting Power of the Company and (y)
prior to such acquisition, at least two-thirds of the directors described
in paragraph (c) of this definition vote to adopt a resolution of the
Board to the specific effect that such acquisition shall not be deemed a
Change in Control; and
|
|
|
(iii) no
Change in Control shall be deemed to have occurred solely by reason any
such acquisition or holding in connection with any merger, reorganization
or consolidation of the Company or any Subsidiary which is not a Change in
Control within the meaning of paragraph (a)(i) of this
definition.
|
Notwithstanding the
occurrence of any of the foregoing events, no Change in Control shall occur with
respect to Executive if (i) the event which otherwise would be
a
Change in Control
(or the transaction which resulted in such event) was initiated by Executive or
was discussed by him with any third party, in either case without the approval
of the Board with respect to Executive’s initiation or discussion, as
applicable, or (ii) Executive is, by written agreement, a participant on his own
behalf in a transaction in which the persons (or their affiliates) with whom
Executive has the written agreement cause the Change in Control to occur and,
pursuant to the written agreement, Executive has an equity interest (or a right
to acquire such equity interest) in the resulting entity.
“Code” means the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
“Date of Termination”
means the effective date of any termination of Executive's employment for any or
no reason, whether by the Company or by Executive, as specified in the Notice of
Termination; provided, however, that if Executive's employment is terminated by
reason of his death or Disability, the Date of Termination shall be the date of
death or the Disability Effective Date, as the case may be.
“Effective Date” means
the first date during the Agreement Term on which a Change in Control
occurs. Anything in this Agreement to the contrary notwithstanding,
if Executive's employment with the Company is terminated prior to the date on
which a Change in Control occurs, and Executive reasonably demonstrates that
such termination of employment (i) was requested by a third party who has taken
steps reasonably calculated to effect the Change in Control or
(ii) otherwise arose in connection with or anticipation of the Change in
Control, then for all purposes of this Agreement the Effective Date shall be the
date immediately prior to the Date of Termination.
“Employment Period”
means the period commencing on the Effective Date and ending on the second
anniversary of such date.
“Exempt Person” means
any one or more of the following:
(a) any descendant of W.W. Grainger,
or any spouse, widow or widower of W.W. Grainger or any such descendant (any
such descendants, spouses, widows and widowers collectively defined as the
“Grainger Family
Members”);
(b) any descendant of E.O. Slavik,
or any spouse, widow or widower of E.O. Slavik or any such descendant (any such
descendants, spouses, widows and widowers collectively defined as the “Slavik Family
Members” and with the Grainger Family Members collectively defined as the
“Family
Members”);
(c) any trust which is in existence
on the Agreement Date and which has been established by one or more Grainger
Family Members, any estate of a Grainger Family Member who died on or before the
Agreement Date, and The
Grainger Foundation
(such trusts, estates and named entity collectively defined as the “Grainger Family
Entities”);
(d) any trust which is in existence
on the Agreement Date and which has been established by one or more Slavik
Family Members, any estate of a Slavik Family Member who died on or before the
Agreement Date and Mark IV Capital, Inc. (such trusts, estates and named
entities collectively defined as the “Slavik Family
Entities” and with the Grainger Family Entities collectively defined as
the “Existing Family
Entities”);
(e) any estate of a Family Member
who dies after the Agreement Date or any trust established after the Agreement
Date by one or more Family Members or Existing Family Entities; provided that
one or more Family Members, Existing Family Entities or
charitable organizations which qualify as exempt organizations under Section
501(c) of the Code (“Charitable
Organizations”), collectively are the beneficiaries of at least 50% of
the actuarially-determined beneficial interests in such estate or
trust;
(f) any Charitable Organization
which is established by one or more Family Members or Existing Family Entities
(a “Family Charitable
Organization”);
(g) any corporation of which a
majority of the voting power and a majority of the equity interest is held,
directly or indirectly, by or for the benefit of one or more Family Members,
Existing Family Entities, estates or trusts described in clause (e) above, or
Family Charitable Organizations; or
(h) any partnership or other entity
or arrangement of which a majority of the voting interest and a majority of the
economic interest is held, directly or indirectly, by or for the benefit of one
or more Family Members, Existing Family Entities, estates or trusts described in
clause (e) above, or Family Charitable Organizations.
“Good Reason” -- see
Section 3(c).
“including” means
including without limitation.
“Non-Employee
Director” means a director of the Company who is not an employee of (i)
the Company, (ii) any Subsidiary or (iii) any Person who beneficially owns more
than 30% of the Common Stock then outstanding.
“Person” means any
individual, corporation, partnership, limited liability company, sole
proprietorship, trust or other entity.
“Policies” means
policies, practices and programs.
“Prorated Annual
Bonus” means the product of (i) the amount of the annual bonus to which
Executive would have been entitled (based on target-level performance) if he had
been employed by the Company on the last day of the Company's fiscal year that
includes the Date of Termination and if performance were achieved at the target
level for such fiscal year, multiplied by (ii) a fraction of which the
numerator is the numbers of days that have elapsed in such fiscal year through
the Date of Termination and the denominator is 365.
“Subsidiary” means
corporation, limited liability company, partnership or other business entity in
which the Company, directly or indirectly, holds a majority of the voting power
of the outstanding securities.
“Target
Bonus” means the amount of the annual bonus which Executive
was, as of the Date of Termination, eligible to receive in respect of the fiscal
year of the Date of Termination, assuming for purposes of this paragraph (i)
that target-level performance had been achieved for such fiscal year, (ii) that
Executive's employment would have continued until the first date on which such
annual bonus would have been payable, and (iii) if the amount of such annual
bonus that Executive was eligible to receive was reduced after the Effective
Date (whether or not such reduction qualified as Good Reason), that such
reduction had not occurred.
“Taxes” means the
incremental United States federal, state and local income, excise and other
taxes payable by Executive with respect to any applicable item of
income.
2. Terms of
Employment. The Company shall continue Executive in its employ
during the Employment Period on the following terms and conditions:
(a) Position and
Duties.
|
|
(i) During
the Employment Period, (A) Executive's position (including status,
offices, titles and reporting requirements), authority, duties and
responsibilities shall be at least commensurate in all material respects
with the most significant of those held, exercised and assigned at any
time during the 90-day period immediately preceding the Effective Date and
(B) Executive's services shall be performed at the location where
Executive was employed immediately preceding the Effective Date or any
office or location less than 50 miles from such
location.
|
|
|
(ii) During
the Employment Period, and excluding any periods of vacation, sick leave
and disability to which Executive is entitled, Executive shall devote
reasonable attention and time during normal business hours to the business
and affairs of the Company and, to the extent necessary to discharge the
responsibilities assigned to Executive thereunder, use Executive's
reasonable best efforts to perform faithfully and efficiently
such
|
responsibilities. During
the Employment Period, Executive may (A) serve on corporate, civic or
charitable boards or committees, (B) deliver lectures, fulfill speaking
engagements or teach at educational institutions and (C) manage personal
investments, so long as such activities are consistent with the policies of the
Company at the Effective Date and do not significantly interfere with the
performance of Executive's responsibilities (as set forth in this Agreement) as
an employee of the Company. To the extent that any such activities
have been conducted by Executive prior to the Effective Date and were consistent
with the policies of the Company at the Effective Date, the continued conduct of
such activities (or the conduct of activities similar in nature and scope
thereto) subsequent to the Effective Date shall not thereafter be deemed to
interfere with the performance of Executive's responsibilities to the
Company.
|
|
(i) Base
Salary. During the Employment Period, Executive shall
receive an annual base salary in cash (“Annual Base
Salary”), which shall be paid in a manner consistent with the
Company's payroll practices immediately preceding the Effective Date at a
rate at least equal to 12 times the highest monthly base salary (unreduced
by any salary reductions or deferrals pursuant to a plan maintained under
Section 401(k) of the Code or any similar plan) paid or payable to
Executive by the Company in respect of the 12-month period immediately
preceding the month in which the Effective Date occurs. During
the Employment Period, the Company shall review the Annual Base Salary at
least annually and may increase Annual Base Salary at any time and from
time to time based on the performance of the Executive and the
Company. Any increase in Annual Base Salary shall not serve to
limit or reduce any other obligation to Executive under this
Agreement. Annual Base Salary shall not be reduced after any
such increase and the term “Annual Base Salary” shall refer to Annual Base
Salary as so increased.
|
|
|
(ii) Annual
Bonus. In addition to Annual Base Salary, during the
Employment Period Executive shall be entitled to participate in the
Management Incentive Program or other annual bonus program maintained by
the Company for peer executives, and the Executive's target bonus
thereunder shall be not be less than the Target Bonus. Any
annual bonus due to Executive under such program (the "Annual Bonus")
shall be paid in cash no later than 90 days after the end of the fiscal
year for which the Annual Bonus is awarded, unless Executive shall elect
to defer the receipt of such Annual
Bonus.
|
|
|
(iii) Incentive, Savings and
Retirement Plans. In addition to Annual Base Salary and
Annual Bonus payable as hereinabove provided, Executive shall be entitled
to participate during the Employment Period in all incentive, savings and
retirement plans and Policies applicable to
peer
|
executives of the
Company, but in no event shall such plans and Policies provide Executive with
incentive, savings and retirement benefits opportunities, in each case, less
favorable, in the aggregate, than the most favorable of those provided by the
Company for Executive under such plans and Policies as in effect at any time
during the 90-day period immediately preceding the Effective
Date. Benefits to which this paragraph shall apply include, but are
not limited to, a contribution (“Average Profit Sharing Plan
Contribution”) for each calendar year of Executive's employment during
the Employment Period, on Executive's behalf to the W.W. Grainger, Inc. Profit
Sharing Plan (the “PST”) and, if
applicable, a credit under the W.W. Grainger, Inc. Supplemental Profit Sharing
Plan (the “Supplemental Plan”
and with the PST, collectively referred to as the “Profit Sharing
Plans”) equal to not less than the product of (A) the average
percentage of the sum of Executive's base salary and annual bonus paid or
payable as a contribution to or credit under the Profit Sharing Plans, as
applicable, for the three fiscal years preceding the Effective Date, and
(B) the sum of Executive's Annual Base Salary and annual bonus, each as of
the first day of such calendar year. In the event that a contribution
or credit, as applicable, of less than the Average Profit Sharing Plan
Contribution is made to the Profit Sharing Plans on Executive's behalf for any
calendar year of Executive's employment during the Employment Period, Executive
shall be entitled to a cash payment equal to the difference between the Average
Profit Sharing Plan Contribution and the amount of the Company's contribution or
credit, as applicable, to the Profit Sharing Plans on Executive's behalf for
such year, payable at the time that the Company's contribution is made to the
PST, but in no event later than the date prescribed by law, including extensions
of time, for the filing of the Company's federal income tax return for such
year.
|
|
(iv) Welfare Benefit
Plans. During the Employment Period, Executive and/or
Executive's family, as the case may be, shall be eligible to participate
in and shall receive all benefits under welfare benefit plans and Policies
provided by the Company (including medical, prescription, dental,
disability, salary continuance, employee life, group life, accidental
death and travel accident insurance plans and programs) and applicable to
peer executives of the Company, but in no event shall such plans and
Policies provide benefits which are less favorable, in the aggregate, than
the most favorable of such plans and Policies in effect at any time during
the 90-day period immediately preceding the Effective
Date.
|
|
|
(v) Expenses. During
the Employment Period, Executive shall be entitled to prompt reimbursement
for all reasonable expenses incurred by Executive in accordance with the
most favorable Policies of the Company in effect at any time during the
90-day period immediately preceding the Effective Date or, if more
favorable to Executive, as in effect at any time thereafter with respect
to peer executives of the
Company.
|
|
|
(vi) Fringe
Benefits. During the Employment Period, Executive shall
be entitled to fringe benefits in accordance with the most favorable plans
and Policies of the Company in effect at any time during the 90-day period
immediately preceding the Effective Date or, if more favorable to
Executive, as in effect at any time thereafter with respect to peer
executives of the Company.
|
|
|
(vii) Office; Support
Staff. During the Employment Period, Executive shall be
entitled to an office or offices of a size and with furnishings and other
appointments, and to personal secretarial and other assistance, at least
equal to the most favorable of the foregoing provided to Executive by the
Company at any time during the 90-day period immediately preceding the
Effective Date or, if more favorable to Executive, as provided at any time
thereafter with respect to peer executives of the
Company.
|
|
|
(viii) Vacation. During
the Employment Period, Executive shall be entitled to paid vacation in
accordance with the most favorable plans and Policies of the Company as in
effect at any time during the 90-day period immediately preceding the
Effective Date or, if more favorable to Executive, as in effect at any
time thereafter with respect to peer executives of the
Company.
|
|
|
(ix) Subsidiaries. To
the extent that, immediately prior to the Effective Date, Executive has
been on the payroll of, and participated in the bonus, incentive or
employee benefit plans of, a Subsidiary, the references to the Company
contained in Sections 2(b)(i) through 2(b)(viii) and elsewhere in this
Agreement referring to benefits to which Executive may be entitled shall
also refer to such Subsidiary.
|
3. Termination of
Employment.
(a) Death or
Disability. Executive's employment shall terminate
automatically upon Executive's death during the Employment Period. If
the Company determines in good faith that the Disability of Executive has
occurred during the Employment Period, it may give to Executive written notice
of its intention to terminate Executive's employment. In such event,
Executive's employment with the Company shall terminate as of the 30th day after
Executive’s receipt of such notice (the “Disability Effective
Date”); provided that, within the 30 days after such receipt, Executive
shall not have returned to full-time performance of his
duties. “Disability” means the
absence of Executive from Executive's duties with the Company on a full-time
basis for a period of time equal to the Waiting Period as a result of incapacity
due to mental or physical illness that is determined to be total and permanent
by a physician selected by the Company or its insurers and acceptable to
Executive or Executive's legal representative (such agreement as to
acceptability not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed). “Waiting Period” means
the waiting period under
a
long-term disability plan of the Company that is applicable to Executive and
satisfies the requirements of Section 2(b)(iv).
(b) Cause. The
Company may terminate Executive's employment during the Employment Period for
Cause. “Cause” means the
occurrence of any one or more of the following actions or failures to act as
determined by the Board in its reasonable judgment and in good
faith:
|
|
(i) embezzlement,
fraud or theft with respect to the property of the Company or a conviction
for any felony involving moral turpitude or causing material harm,
financial or otherwise, to the
Company;
|
|
|
(ii) habitual
neglect in the performance of Executive's significant duties (other than
on account of incapacity due to physical or mental illness or Disability);
or
|
|
|
(iii) a
demonstrably deliberate act or failure to act, including a violation of
the rules or policies of the Company, which causes a material financial or
other loss, damage or injury to the property, reputation or employees of
the Company; provided, however, that, unless such an act or a failure to
act was done by Executive in bad faith or without a reasonable belief that
Executive's act or failure to act, as the case may be, was in the best
interest of the Company or was required by applicable law, such act or
failure to act shall not constitute Cause if, within 20 days after the
Board or the Chief Executive Officer of the Company gives Executive
written notice of such act or failure to act that specifically refers to
this Section, Executive cures such act or failure to act to the fullest
extent that it is curable.
|
“Cause” shall not
mean (x) bad judgment or negligence other than habitual neglect of significant
duties or (y) any act or omission in respect of which the Board could have
properly determined that Executive met the applicable standard of conduct for
the indemnification or reimbursement under the by-laws of the Company or
applicable law, in each case as in effect at the time of such act or
omission. In addition, a termination of Executive's employment shall
not be deemed to be for Cause unless each of the following conditions is
satisfied:
|
|
(v) The
Company provides Executive a written notice (a “Notice of Intent to
Terminate”) not less than 30 days prior to the Date of Termination
setting forth the Company's intention to consider terminating Executive’s
employment. Such Notice shall include a statement of the
intended Date of Termination and a detailed description of the specific
facts that the Company believes to constitute
Cause.
|
|
|
(w) No
act or omission of Executive shall constitute Cause if such act or
omission occurred more than 12 months before the earliest date on which
any member of the Board who is not a party to the act or
omission
|
knew or in the
reasonable exercise of his or her duties as a director should have known of such
act or omission.
|
|
(x) Executive
is offered an opportunity to respond to such Notice of Intent to Terminate
by appearing in person, together with Executive's legal counsel, before
the Board on a date specified in the Notice of Intent to Terminate, which
date shall be at least 25 days after Executive’s receipt of the Notice of
Intent to Terminate and, in any event, at least five days prior to the
Date of Termination proposed in such
Notice.
|
|
|
(y) By
a vote of the Board that includes the affirmative vote of at least 75% of
the Non-Employee Directors, the Board determines that the actions of
Executive specified in the Notice of Intent to Terminate constitute Cause
and that Executive's employment should accordingly be terminated for
Cause.
|
|
|
(z) The
Company provides Executive a copy of the Board's written determination
setting forth in detail (I) the specific basis for such termination for
Cause and (II) if the Date of Termination is other than the date of
Executive’s receipt of such determination, the Date of Termination (which
date shall be not more than 15 days after the giving of such
notice).
|
By
determination of the Board, the Company may suspend Executive from his duties
for a period of up to 30 days with full pay and benefits thereunder during the
period of time in which the Board is determining whether to terminate Executive
for Cause. Any purported termination for Cause by the Company that does not
satisfy each substantive and procedural requirement of this Section 3(b) shall
be treated for all purposes under this Agreement as a termination by the Company
without Cause.
(c) Good
Reason. Executive may terminate his employment at any time
during the Employment Period for Good Reason. “Good Reason” means
any one or more of the following:
|
|
(i) the
assignment to Executive of any duties inconsistent in any material respect
with Executive's position (including status, offices, titles and reporting
requirements), authority, duties or responsibilities as contemplated by
Section 2(a), or any other action by the Company which results in a
material adverse change in such position, authority, duties or
responsibilities, excluding an isolated, insubstantial and inadvertent
action not taken in bad faith and which is remedied by the Company
promptly after receipt of notice thereof given by Executive (it
being understood that, without limiting the generality of the foregoing,
if a substantial portion of Executive's duties prior to the Change in
Control related to the Company's status as a public company and such
activities no longer constitute a substantial portion of Executive's
duties during the Employment Period, then Executive shall be deemed to
have "Good Reason");
|
|
|
(ii) any
reduction by the Company in the base salary, annual bonus opportunity or
long-term incentive opportunity provided to the Executive under Section
2(b), or any material reduction by the Company in the aggregate benefits
(other than base salary, annual bonus opportunity or long-term incentive
opportunity) provided to the Executive under such
section;
|
|
|
(iii) any
requirement that Executive be based at any office or location other than
the location specified in Section
2(a)(i)(B);
|
|
|
(iv) any
purported termination by the Company of Executive's employment otherwise
than as expressly permitted by this Agreement (it being understood that
any such purported termination shall not be effective for any other
purpose of this Agreement); or
|
|
|
(v) any
failure by the Company to comply with Section
10(c).
|
Any good faith
determination of Good Reason made by Executive shall be conclusive.
(d) Notice of
Termination. Any termination of Executive’s employment by the
Company or by Executive shall be communicated by Notice of Termination to the
other party hereto. “Notice of
Termination” means a written notice which (i) indicates the specific
termination provision in this Agreement relied upon, (ii) sets forth in
reasonable detail the facts and circumstances claimed to provide a basis for
termination of Executive's employment under the provision so indicated and
(iii) if the Date of Termination is other than the date of receipt of such
notice, specifies the Date of Termination (which date shall be not more than 15
days after the giving of such notice). The failure by Executive to
set forth in the Notice of Termination any fact or circumstance which
contributes to a showing of Good Reason shall not waive any right of Executive
thereunder or preclude Executive from asserting such fact or circumstance in
enforcing Executive's rights thereunder.
(e) Transitional
Assistance. If the Company shall so request, Executive shall
provide reasonable assistance to the Company to help ensure an orderly
transition of Executive's duties and responsibilities to such individual(s) as
the Company may designate, provided that the period during which Executive shall
provide such assistance shall not exceed ninety (90) days and that during such
period Executive's employment with the Company shall continue and the Company
shall compensate Executive as described in Section 2(b) above. Any
such transitional assistance and continuation of employment shall not waive,
release or otherwise affect any of the Executive's rights or the Company's
obligations hereunder, including without limitation those set forth in Section 4
below.
4. Obligations of the Company
upon Termination.
(a) Good Reason; Other Than for
Cause or Disability. If, during the Employment Period,
Executive's employment shall be terminated by the Company other than for Cause,
death or Disability, or by Executive for Good Reason, then the Company shall
have all of the following obligations:
|
|
(i) The
Company shall pay to Executive the following amounts in a lump sum in cash
within 10 days after Executive's Date of
Termination:
|
|
|
(A) an
amount equal to the sum of Executive's Accrued Base Salary, Accrued Annual
Bonus and accrued but unpaid vacation pay (collectively, the “Accrued
Obligations”),
|
|
|
(B) the
Prorated Annual Bonus,
|
|
|
(C) the
product of three (3.0) (such number, the “Severance
Multiple”) times the sum of Executive's (I) Annual Base
Salary, (II) Target Bonus and (III) Average Profit Sharing Plan
Contribution; and
|
|
|
(D) an
amount equal to the value of the unvested portion of Executive's accounts
under the Profit Sharing Plans as of the Date of
Termination.
|
|
|
(ii)
|
(A) During
the period commencing on the Date of Termination and continuing thereafter
for a number of years equal to the Severance Multiple, or such longer
period as any plan or Policy in which Executive is a participant as of the
Date of Termination (such eligibility to be determined based on the terms
of such plan or Policy as in effect on the Effective Date or, if more
favorable to Executive, the terms of such plan or Policy as in effect on
the Date of Termination), the Company shall continue to provide medical
(including post-retirement medical benefits to the extent that Executive
is or becomes eligible for such benefits as of the Date of Termination
after giving effect to paragraph (C) of this Section 4(a)(ii)),
prescription, dental and similar health care benefits (or, if such
benefits are not available, the after-tax economic value thereof
determined pursuant to paragraph (D) of this Section 4(a)(ii)) to
Executive and his family.
|
|
|
(B) The
terms of such benefits shall be at least as favorable to Executive as the
terms of the most favorable plans or Policies of the Company applicable to
peer executives at Executive's Date of Termination, but in no event less
favorable to Executive than the most favorable plans or Policies of the
Company applicable to peer
|
executives during
the 90-day period immediately preceding the Effective Date.
|
|
(C) Such
benefits shall be provided at no cost to Executive and his family, except
that Executive shall be responsible for the payment of premiums,
co-payments, deductibles and similar charges based on the terms of the
most favorable plans or Policies of the Company applicable to peer
executives at Executive's Date of Termination, but in no event less
favorable to Executive than the most favorable plans or Policies of the
Company applicable to peer executives during the 90-day period immediately
preceding the Effective Date.
|
|
|
(D) For
purposes of determining whether, and on what terms and conditions,
Executive is eligible to receive the post-retirement medical benefits
specified in paragraph (A) above, Executive shall on the Date of
Termination be credited with three (3.0) additional years for purposes of
attained age and years of service.
|
|
|
(E) The
after-tax economic value of any benefit to be provided pursuant to
paragraph (A) above shall be deemed to be the present value of the
premiums expected to be paid for all such benefits that are to be provided
on an insured basis. The after-tax economic value of all other
benefits shall be deemed to be the present value of the expected net cost
to the Company of providing such
benefits.
|
|
|
(iii) The
Company shall cause Executive to receive, at the Company's expense,
standard outplacement services from a nationally-recognized firm selected
by Executive; provided that the cost of such services to the Company shall
not exceed 15% of Executive's Annual Base Salary in effect on the Date of
Termination.
|
|
|
(iv) If
on the Date of Termination the Executive is a “specified employee” of the
Company (as defined in Treasury Regulation Section 1.409A-1(i)), and if
amounts payable under this Section 4(a) (other than Accrued Obligations)
are not on account of an “involuntary separation from service” (as defined
in Treasury Regulation Section 1.409A – 1(n)), amounts that would
otherwise have been paid during the 6-month period immediately following
the Date of Termination shall be paid on the first regular payroll date
immediately following the 6-month anniversary of the Date of
Termination.
|
(b) Cause; Other than for Good
Reason. If, during the Employment Period, Executive's
employment is terminated by the Company for Cause or by Executive other than for
Good Reason, the Company shall pay to Executive in a lump sum in cash within no
more than 10 days after the Date of Termination, any Accrued
Obligations.
(c) Death or
Disability. If, during the Employment Period, Executive's
employment is terminated by reason of Executive's death or Disability, the
Company shall pay to Executive in cash a lump sum amount equal to all Accrued
Obligations within no more than 10 days after the Date of
Termination.
5. Non-exclusivity of
Rights. If Executive receives payments pursuant to Section
4(a), Executive hereby waives the right to receive severance payments under any
other plan, policy or agreement of the Company. Except as provided in
the previous sentence, nothing in this Agreement shall prevent or limit
Executive's continuing or future participation in any benefit, bonus, incentive
or other plans or Policies provided by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries
and for which Executive may qualify, nor shall anything herein limit or
otherwise affect such rights as Executive may have under any other agreements
with the Company or any of its Subsidiaries.
6. Full
Settlement. The Company's obligation to make the payments
provided for in this Agreement and otherwise to perform its obligations
hereunder shall not be affected by any circumstances, including set-off,
counterclaim, recoupment, defense or other claim, right or action that the
Company may have against Executive or others.
7. No Duty to
Mitigate. Executive shall not be obligated to seek other
employment or take any other action by way of mitigation of the amounts payable
to Executive under any of the provisions of this Agreement, nor shall the amount
of any payment hereunder be reduced by any compensation earned by Executive as
result of employment by another employer or by any retirement benefits which may
be paid or payable to Executive; provided, however, that any continued welfare
benefits provided for pursuant to Section 4(a)(ii) shall not duplicate any
benefits that are provided to Executive and his family by such other employer
and shall be secondary to any coverage provided by such other
employer.
8. Enforcement.
(a) If Executive incurs legal,
accounting, expert witness or other fees and expenses in an effort to establish
entitlement to compensation and benefits under this Agreement, the Company
shall, regardless of the outcome of such effort, pay or reimburse Executive for
such fees and expenses. The Company shall reimburse Executive for
such fees and expenses on a monthly basis within 10 days after its receipt of
his request for reimbursement accompanied by reasonable evidence that the fees
and expenses were incurred.
(b) If Executive does not prevail
(after exhaustion of all available judicial remedies), and the Company
establishes before a court of competent jurisdiction that Executive had no
reasonable basis for bringing an action hereunder and acted in bad faith in
doing so, no further reimbursement for legal fees and expenses shall be due to
Executive and Executive shall refund any amounts previously reimbursed hereunder
with respect to such action.
(c) If the Company fails to pay any
amount provided under this Agreement when due, the Company shall pay interest on
such amount at a rate equal to 200 basis points over the prime commercial
lending rate published from time to time in The Wall Street Journal;
provided, however, that if the interest rate determined in accordance with this
Section shall in no event exceed the highest legally-permissible interest
rate.
9. Better After
Tax Approach.
(a) Excise
Taxes. In the event that any monetary or other benefit
received or deemed received by Executive from the Company or any Subsidiary or
affiliate pursuant to this Agreement or otherwise (“Change in Control
Benefits”): (i) constitutes or may constitute “Parachute Payments” within the
meaning of Section 280G of the Code, and (ii) but for this Section 9, would be
subject to any excise tax under Section 4999 of the Code or any similar tax
under any United States federal, state, local or other law (such excise tax and
all such similar taxes individually and collectively, “Excise Taxes”), then,
at the option of Executive, such Change in Control Benefits shall be either: (x)
delivered in full, or (y) delivered as to such lesser extent which would result
in no portion of such Change in Control Benefits being subject to Excise Taxes;
whichever of the foregoing amounts, taking into account the applicable federal,
state and local income and employment taxes and the Excise Taxes results in the
receipt by the Executive on an after-tax basis, of the greatest amount of Change
in Control Benefits, notwithstanding that all or some portion of such Change in
Control Benefits may be taxable under Section 4999 of the Code. For the
avoidance of doubt, this Section 9 provides Executive with the option to reduce
the amount of any such Change in Control Benefits payable to such Executive, if
doing so would place the Executive in a better net after-tax economic position
as compared with not doing so (taking into account the applicable federal, state
and local income and employment taxes and the Excise Taxes).
(b) Reduction. Any
reduction in Change in Control Benefits allowed by Section 9(a) shall occur in
the following order: (i) reduction of cash payments; (ii) reduction of vesting
acceleration of equity awards; and (iii) reduction of other benefits paid or
provided to the Executive. In the event that acceleration of vesting of equity
awards is to be reduced, such acceleration of vesting shall be canceled in the
reverse order of the date of grant for the Executive's equity awards. If two or
more equity awards are granted on the same date, each award will be reduced on a
pro-rata basis. In the event that the other benefits paid or provided
to the Executive are
to
be reduced the reduction in the specific benefit or amount of benefit shall be
determined by the Company in its sole discretion.
(c) Tax
Advisor. Unless the Company and the Executive otherwise agree
in writing, the determinations set forth in Section 9(a) will be made in writing
by an independent tax advisor selected by the Company (the “Tax Advisor”). For
purposes of making the calculations required by this Section 9, the Tax Advisor
may make reasonable assumptions and approximations concerning applicable taxes
and may rely on reasonable, good faith interpretations concerning the
application of Sections 280G and 4999 of the Code. The Company and the Executive
agree to furnish to the Tax Advisor such information and documents as the Tax
Advisor may reasonably request in order to make a determination under this
provision. The Company will bear all costs the Tax Advisor may reasonably incur
in connection with any calculations contemplated by this provision. Further, the
Company shall, in addition to complying with this Section 9(c), cause all
determinations under Section 9(a) to be made as soon as reasonably possible
after the announcement of the Change in Control and in adequate time to permit
Executive to determine which election to make under Section 9(a) and to prepare
and file Executive’s individual tax returns on a timely
basis.
10. Successors.
(a) This Agreement is personal to
Executive and without the prior written consent of the Company shall not be
assignable by Executive otherwise than by will or the laws of descent and
distribution. This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be
enforceable by Executive's legal representatives.
(b) The Company may not assign its
rights and obligations under this Agreement without the prior written consent of
Executive except to a successor which has satisfied the provisions of Section
10(c). This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of the Company and
such permitted assigns.
(c) The Company will require any
successor (whether direct or indirect, by purchase, merger, consolidation or
otherwise) to all or substantially all of the business and/or assets of the
Company to assume expressly and agree to perform this Agreement in the same
manner and to the same extent that the Company would be required to perform it
if no such succession had taken place. All references to the Company
shall also refer to any such successor, and the Company and such successor shall
be jointly and severally liable for all obligations of the Company under this
Agreement.
11. Miscellaneous.
(a) Applicable
Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in
accordance with the laws of the State of Illinois, without reference to such
State's principles of conflict of laws.
(b) Notices. All
notices hereunder shall be in writing and shall be given by hand delivery,
nationally-recognized courier service that provides overnight delivery, or by
registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid,
addressed as follows:
If to Executive, at his most recent home
address on file with the Company.
|
If
to the Company, to:
|
W.W.
Grainger, Inc.
|
|
|
100 Grainger
Parkway
|
|
|
Lake Forest,
Illinois 60045
|
|
|
Attention: General
Counsel
|
|
|
|
or
to such other address as either party shall have furnished to the other in
writing in accordance herewith. Notice shall be effective when
actually received by the addressee.
(c) Severability. If
any part of this Agreement is declared by any court or governmental authority to
be unlawful or invalid, such unlawfulness or invalidity shall not serve to
invalidate any part of this Agreement not declared to be unlawful or
invalid. Any paragraph or part of a paragraph so declared to be
unlawful or invalid shall, if possible, be construed in a manner which will give
effect to the terms of such paragraph or part of a paragraph to the fullest
extent possible while remaining lawful and valid.
(d) Tax
Withholding. The Company may withhold from any amounts payable
under this Agreement such federal, state or local taxes as shall be required to
be withheld pursuant to any applicable law or regulation.
(e) Amendments;
Waiver. This Agreement may not be amended or modified
otherwise than by a written agreement executed by the Company and
Executive. A waiver of any term, covenant or condition contained in
this Agreement shall not result in a waiver of any other term, covenant or
condition, and any waiver of any default shall not result in a waiver of any
later default.
(f) Entire
Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire understanding of
the Company and Executive with respect to the subject matter hereof, and shall
supersede all prior agreements, promises and representations of the parties
regarding employment or severance, whether in writing or
otherwise. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, this
Agreement expressly terminates, with immediate effect, any Change in Control
Employment Agreement which may previously have been entered into between the
Company and Executive.
(g) No Right to
Employment. Except as may be provided under any other
agreement between Executive and the Company, the employment of Executive by the
Company is at will, and, prior to the Effective Date, may be terminated by
either Executive or the Company at any time. Upon a termination of
Executive's
employment prior to
the Effective Date, there shall be no further rights under this
Agreement.
(h) Sections. Except
where otherwise indicated by the context, any reference to a “Section” shall be
to a section of this Agreement.
(i) Survival of Executive's
Rights. All of Executive's rights hereunder shall survive the
termination of Executive's employment.
(j) Number and
Gender. Wherever appropriate, the singular shall include the
plural, the plural shall include the singular, and the masculine shall include
the feminine.
(k) Counterparts. This
Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be
deemed an original, but all of which together will constitute one and the same
instrument.
(l) Section 409A
Compliance. To the extent applicable, it is intended that this
Agreement shall comply with the provisions of Section 409A of the Code, and this
Agreement shall be construed and applied in a manner consistent with this
intent. In the event that any payment or benefit under this Agreement
is determined by the Company to be in the nature of a deferral of compensation,
the Company and the Executive hereby agree to take such actions, not otherwise
provided herein, as may be mutually agreed between the parties to ensure that
such payments comply with the applicable provisions of Section 409A of the Code
and the Treasury Regulations thereunder. To the extent that any
payment or benefit under this Agreement is modified by reason of this Section
11(l), it shall be modified in a manner that complies with Section 409A of the
Code and preserves to the maximum possible extent the economic costs or value
thereof (as applies) to the respective parties (determined on a pre-tax
basis).
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Executive and the Company
have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written.
|
|
W.W.
GRAINGER, INC.
|
|
|
By:________________________________________________ |
|
|
James T.
Ryan
Chairman,
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXECUTIVE:
|
|
|
___________________________________________________
|
|
|
INSERT
NAME
|
Exhibit
10b (xii)
Summary
Description of the Directors Compensation Program
Effective
April 28, 2010
Members of the
Company’s Board of Directors who are not Company employees receive an annual
retainer of $70,000, which is intended to cover all regularly scheduled meetings
of the Board and its committees. If additional meetings are held, a
per-meeting fee of $1,500 will be paid to each attending director.
The Chairs of Board
committees receive additional annual retainers. For the Chair of the
Audit Committee, the retainer is $10,000; and for the Chair of the Board Affairs
and Nominating Committee and the Chair of the Compensation Committee, the
retainer is $5,000. The retainer for the Chair of the Compensation
Committee will increase to $10,000 in April 2010, and the Lead Director will
receive a retainer of $5,000.
All independent
directors also receive an annual deferred stock unit grant. The
number of shares covered by each grant is equal to $100,000 (based on 200 day
average stock price as of January 31, in the year of the grant, a methodology
consistent with the calculation for other executive equity awards), rounded up
to the next ten-share increment. The deferred stock units are settled
upon termination of service as a director. Directors may also defer
their annual retainers, committee chair retainers, and meeting fees in a
deferred stock unit account.
A
director who is an employee of Grainger or any Grainger subsidiary does not
receive any retainer fees for Board or Board committee service, Board or Board
committee meeting attendance fees, or stock options or stock units under the
Director Stock Plan.
Stock ownership
guidelines applicable to non-employees directors were established in
1998. These guidelines provide that within five years after election,
a director must own Grainger common stock and common stock equivalents having a
value of at least five times the annual retainer fee for serving on the
Board.
1
Exhibit
10b (xvi)
W.W. GRAINGER,
INC.
2010 Incentive
Plan
Stock Option
Agreement
This Stock Option Agreement (the “Agreement”)
is dated as of ____________ (the “Effective Date”) and is entered into between
W.W. Grainger, Inc., an Illinois corporation (the “Company”), and
_____________ (the “Executive”).
Pursuant to the
W.W. Grainger, Inc. 2010 Incentive Plan (the "Plan") and in consideration of the
Executive's agreement to enter into an Unfair Competition Agreement between the
Company and the Executive concurrently with this Agreement (the “Unfair
Competition Agreement”), the Company desires to grant to the Executive the right
and option (“Option”) to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock (“Common
Stock”). In turn, the Executive desires to enter into the Unfair Competition
Agreement and accept such Option (the “Awards”), on the terms and conditions set
forth in this Agreement, the Plan and the Unfair Competition
Agreement.
Capitalized
terms used but not defined in this Agreement shall have the meanings specified
in the Plan.
In consideration of the mutual promises set
forth below and in the Unfair Competition Agreement, the parties hereto agree as
follows:
ARTICLE
I
Grants
Subject to the terms and conditions of this
Agreement, the Plan and the Unfair Competition Agreement (the terms of which are
hereby incorporated herein by reference) and effective as of the Effective Date,
the Company hereby grants to the Executive the Option to purchase all or part of
the number of shares of Common Stock specified as follows:
________.
ARTICLE
II
Provisions
Relating to Option
2.01 Term of
Option. The Option shall expire ten years from the Effective
Date (e.g. a grant on January 31, 2000 would expire on January 30, 2010),
subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, the Plan and
the Unfair Competition Agreement.
2.02 Exercise Date. Unless otherwise
provided in the Plan, the Option shall not be exercisable in whole or in part
until the third (3rd)
anniversary of the Effective Date (such date, the “Option Vesting Date”),
provided, however, that the Option shall become immediately exercisable in the
event of the death or disability or the retirement of the Executive, on or after
January 1 of the calendar year immediately following the Effective Date in
accordance with the provisions of the applicable retirement plan and Section
2.03 herein. For purposes of this Agreement, the term “disability”
means the Executive’s inability to engage in any substantial gainful activity by
reason of any
medically
determinable physical or mental impairment that can be expected to result in
death or that has lasted for a continuous period of not less than twelve (12)
months.
2.03 Retirement. If
the retirement of the Executive occurs after the Effective Date but during the
same calendar year as the Effective Date, then the number of options shall be
determined as follows:
|
|
(a) then a
portion of the Option shall become immediately exercisable equal to the
product of (x) the number of shares
subject to the Option, multiplied by (y) a fraction, the numerator of
which is the number of months during the calendar
year
in which the Effective Date occurs that the Executive was employed by the
Company and the denominator of
which is 12; and
|
|
|
(b) the
balance of the Option not immediately exercisable pursuant to subsection
(a) above, will be forfeited in full and the
Executive shall have no further rights with respect to the Option
hereunder.
|
For purposes of the foregoing calculation, the
Executive will be deemed to have been employed by the Company during the month
that his employment terminates if, and only if, such termination occurs on or
after the fifteenth (15th) calendar day of that month.
2.04 Notice. The
Executive may exercise the Option by giving appropriate notice of the
Executive’s desire to exercise the Option. The notice shall specify
the number of shares to be acquired.
2.05 Payment of Purchase
Price. The Executive shall at the time of exercise of the
Option (except in the case of a cashless exercise) tender to the Company the
full purchase price. At the discretion of the Compensation Committee
of the Board (the “Committee”), and subject to such rules and regulations as it
may adopt, the purchase price may be paid (i) in full in cash, (ii) in Common
Stock already owned by the Executive for at least six months and having a fair
market value on the date of exercise equal to the full purchase price, (iii)
through a combination of cash and Common Stock, or (iv) through a cashless
exercise through a broker-dealer approved for this purpose by the
Company.
2.06 Minimum
Exercise. An Option of 200 shares or less must be exercised in
its entirety. An Option for more than 200 shares may be exercised in
part for no fewer than 200 shares, or 100-share multiples in excess thereof,
unless the remaining shares subject to the Option are less than 200 shares, in
which case if any are exercised, the entire balance must be
exercised.
ARTICLE
III
General
3.01 Recoupment of
Incentive-Based Compensation. If the Board of Directors
determines that the Executive has committed fraud against the Company or has
been engaged in any criminal conduct that involves or is related to the Company
and such Executive is entitled to receive performance shares, stock options,
restricted stock units
or cash incentive
compensation (“Incentive Compensation”) then the Company shall recover from the
Executive such Incentive Compensation, in whole or in part, for any period of
time, as it deems appropriate under the circumstances. The Board
shall have sole discretion in determining whether the Executive’s conduct was in
compliance with the law or Company policy and the extent to which the Company
will seek recovery of the Incentive Compensation notwithstanding any other
remedies available to the Company.
3.02 Tax Withholding
Obligations.
The Executive shall be responsible for any required withholding
including, but without limitation, taxes, FICA contributions, or the like under
any federal, state or applicable statute, rule, or regulation in connection with
the award, deferral, vesting, exercise or settlement (as the case may be) of the
Awards. The Company may withhold a number of shares of Common Stock having
a fair market value on the date that the amount is to be withheld equal to the
amount determined by the Company to be the required statutory minimum
withholding; this amount may or may not satisfy the Executive’s calendar year
withholding obligation. The Company shall not issue and deliver any of its
Common Stock until and unless the proper provision for minimum required
withholding has been made.
3.03 Restriction on
Transferability. Except to the extent otherwise provided in
the Plan, the Awards may not be sold, transferred, pledged, assigned, or
otherwise alienated at any time. Any attempt to do so contrary to the
provisions hereof shall be null and void.
3.04 Rights as
Shareholder. The Executive shall not have voting or any other
rights as a shareholder of the Company with respect to the Awards. Upon exercise
of the Option, the Executive will obtain, with respect to the shares of Common
Stock received in such exercise or settlement, full voting and other rights as a
shareholder of the Company.
3.05 Administration. The
Committee shall have the power to interpret the Plan and this Agreement and to
adopt such rules for the administration, interpretation, and application of the
Plan as are consistent therewith and to interpret or revoke any such
rules. All actions taken and all interpretations and determinations
made by the Committee shall be final and binding upon the Executive, the
Company, and all other interested persons. No member of the Committee
shall be personally liable for any action, determination, or interpretation made
in good faith with respect to the Plan or this Agreement.
3.06 Effect on Other Employee
Benefit Plans. The value of the Awards granted pursuant to
this Agreement and the value of shares of Common Stock received in exercise or
settlement (as the case may be) of such Awards shall not be included as
compensation, earnings, salaries, or other similar terms used when calculating
the Executive’s benefits under any employee benefit plan sponsored by the
Company or any Subsidiary except as such plan otherwise expressly
provides. The Company expressly reserves its rights to amend, modify,
or terminate any of the Company’s or any Subsidiary’s employee benefit
plans.
3.07 No Employment
Rights. The Awards granted pursuant to this Agreement shall
not give the Executive any right to remain employed by the Company or a
Subsidiary.
3.08 Amendment. This Agreement may be
amended only by a writing executed by the Company and the Executive which
specifically states that it is amending this
Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Agreement may be
amended solely by the Committee by a writing which specifically states that it
is amending this Agreement, so long as a copy of such amendment is delivered to
the Executive, and provided that no such amendment adversely affecting the
rights of the Executive hereunder may be made without the Executive’s written
consent. Without limiting the foregoing, the Committee reserves the
right to change, by written notice to the Executive, the provisions of the
Awards or this Agreement in any way it may deem necessary or advisable to carry
out the purpose of the grant as a result of any change in applicable laws or
regulations or any future law, regulation, ruling, or judicial decision,
provided that any such change shall be applicable only to Awards which are then
subject to restrictions as provided herein.
3.09 Notices. Any notice to be given
under the terms of this Agreement to the Company shall be addressed to the
Company in care of its Secretary. Any notice to be given to Executive
shall be addressed to Executive at the address listed in the employer’s records
or to the Executive’s account at Smith Barney. By a notice given
pursuant to this section 3.09 either party may designate a different
address for notices. Any notice shall have been deemed given when
actually delivered.
3.10 Severability. If all or any part of
this Agreement or the Plan is declared by any court or governmental authority to
be unlawful or invalid, such unlawfulness or invalidity shall not invalidate any
portion of this Agreement or the Plan not declared to be unlawful or
invalid. Any Section of this Agreement (or part of such a Section) so
declared to be unlawful or invalid shall, if possible, be construed in a manner
which will give effect to the terms of such Section or part of a Section to the
fullest extent possible while remaining lawful and valid.
3.11 Construction. The Options are being
issued pursuant to Article 6 (Stock Options) of the Plan. Awards are
subject to the terms of the Plan. The Executive acknowledges receipt
of the Plan booklet which contains the entire Plan, and the Executive represents
and warrants that he has read the Plan. Additional copies of the Plan are
available upon request during normal business hours at the principal executive
offices of the Company. To the extent that any provision of this
Agreement violates or is inconsistent with an express provision of the Plan, the
Plan provision shall govern and any inconsistent provision in this Agreement
shall be of no force or effect.
3.12 Miscellaneous.
(a) The Board may terminate,
amend, or modify the Plan; provided, however, that no such termination,
amendment, or modification of the Plan may in any way adversely affect the
Executive’s rights under this Agreement without the Executive’s written
approval.
(b) This Agreement shall be
subject to all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, and to such approvals by
any governmental agencies or national securities exchanges as may be
required.
(c) All obligations of the Company
under the Plan and this Agreement, with respect to the Awards, shall be binding
on any successor to the Company, whether the existence of such successor is the
result of a direct or indirect purchase, merger, consolidation, or otherwise, of
all or substantially all of the business and/or assets of the
Company.
(d) To the extent not preempted by
federal law, this Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance
with, the laws of the State of Illinois.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the parties have executed and delivered this Agreement effective as of the day
and year first above written.
W.W.
GRAINGER, INC.
By:____________________________________
James T. Ryan
Chairman, President and Chief Executive
Officer
EXECUTIVE
_____________________________________
Executive
(Signature)
_____________________________________
Executive (Print
Name)
Exhibit
10b(xvii)
W.W.
GRAINGER, INC.
2010
Incentive Plan
Stock
Option and Restricted Stock Unit Agreement
This Stock Option and Restricted Stock Unit
Agreement (the “Agreement”) is dated as of ____________________ (the “Effective
Date”) and is entered into between W.W. Grainger, Inc., an Illinois
corporation (the “Company”), and _______________ (the “Executive”).
Pursuant to the
W.W. Grainger, Inc. 2010 Incentive Plan (the "Plan") and in consideration of the
Executive's agreement to enter into an Unfair Competition Agreement between the
Company and the Executive concurrently with this Agreement (the “Unfair
Competition Agreement”), the Company desires to grant to the Executive (i) the
right and option (“Option”) to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock
(“Common Stock”) and (ii) restricted stock units (referred to herein as “RSUs”),
and the Executive desires to enter into the Unfair Competition Agreement and
accept such Option and RSUs (the “Awards”), on the terms and conditions set
forth in this Agreement, the Plan and the Unfair Competition
Agreement.
Capitalized terms used but not defined in this Agreement shall have the meanings
specified in the Plan.
In consideration of the mutual promises set
forth below and in the Unfair Competition Agreement, the parties hereto agree as
follows:
ARTICLE
I
Grants
Subject to the terms and conditions of this
Agreement, the Plan and the Unfair Competition Agreement (the terms of which are
hereby incorporated herein by reference) and effective as of the Effective Date,
the Company hereby grants to the Executive ______ RSUs and the Option to
purchase all or part of _________ shares of Common Stock.
ARTICLE
II
Provisions
Relating to Option
2.01 Term of
Option. The Option shall expire ten years from the Effective
Date (e.g., a grant on January 31, 2000 would expire on January 30, 2010),
subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, the Plan and
the Unfair Competition Agreement.
2.02 Exercise Date. Unless otherwise
provided in the Plan, the Option shall not be exercisable in whole or in part
until the third (3rd)
anniversary of the Effective Date (such date, the “Option Vesting Date”),
provided, however, that the Option shall become immediately exercisable in the
event of the death or disability or the retirement of the Executive on or after
January 1 of the calendar year immediately following the Effective Date in
accordance with the provisions of the applicable retirement plan and Section
2.03 herein. For purposes of this
Agreement, the term “disability”
means the Executive’s inability to engage in any substantial gainful
activity by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment
that can be expected to result in death or that has lasted for a continuous
period of not less than twelve (12) months.
2.03 Retirement. If
the retirement of the Executive occurs after the Effective Date but during the
same calendar year as the Effective Date then the number of options shall be
determined as follows:
(a) a portion of the Option shall
become immediately exercisable equal to the product of (x) the number of shares
subject to the Option, multiplied by (y) a fraction, the numerator of which is
the number of months during the calendar year in which the Effective Date occurs
that the Executive was employed by the company and the denominator of which is
12; and
(b) the balance of the Option not
immediately exercisable pursuant to subsection (a) above, will be forfeited in
full and the Executive shall have no further rights with respect to the Option
hereunder.
For purposes of the
foregoing calculation, the Executive will be deemed to have been employed by the
Company during the month that his employment terminates if, and only if, such
termination occurs on or after the fifteenth (15th)
calendar day of that month.
2.04 Notice. The
Executive may exercise the Option by giving appropriate notice of the
Executive’s desire to exercise the Option. The notice shall specify
the number of shares to be acquired.
2.05 Payment of Purchase
Price. The Executive shall at the time of exercise of the
Option (except in the case of a cashless exercise) tender to the Company the
full purchase price. At the discretion of the Compensation Committee
of the Board (the “Committee”), and subject to such rules and regulations as it
may adopt, the purchase price may be paid (i) in full in cash, (ii) in
Common Stock already owned by the Executive for at least six months and having a
fair market value on the date of exercise equal to the full purchase price,
(iii) through a combination of cash and Common Stock, or (iv) through a cashless
exercise through a broker-dealer approved for this purpose by the
Company.
2.06 Minimum
Exercise. An Option of 200 shares or less must be exercised in
its entirety. An Option for more than 200 shares may be exercised in
part for no fewer than 200 shares, or 100-share multiples in excess thereof,
unless the remaining shares subject to the Option are less than 200 shares, in
which case if any are exercised, the entire balance must be
exercised.
ARTICLE
III
Provisions
Relating to RSUs
3.01 Vesting. If
the Executive remains continuously employed by the Company or a Subsidiary until
the third (3rd)
anniversary of the Effective Date (such date, the “RSU Vesting Date”), then 100
percent of the RSUs shall vest on such date, but no such vesting shall
occur
before the RSU
Vesting Date unless otherwise provided or permitted by the Plan or this
Agreement. Vesting of the RSUs means that the RSUs shall be converted
into shares of Common Stock (“settled”) on the RSU Vesting Date, unless such
settlement is deferred by the Executive as described in Section 3.04
below.
3.02 Effect of Termination of
Employment. If the Executive’s
employment is terminated by the Executive or by the Company or a Subsidiary
prior to the third anniversary of the Effective Date for any reason other than
the Executive’s retirement, death or disability, all of the RSUs shall be
forfeited. The RSUs shall immediately vest in the event of the death,
disability or retirement of the Executive in accordance with the provisions of
the applicable retirement plan, and the date of such vesting shall be the RSU
Vesting Date for all purposes hereunder. For purposes of this
Agreement, the term “disability” means the Executive’s inability to engage in
any substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable
physical or mental impairment that can be expected to result in death or that
has lasted for a continuous period of not less than twelve (12)
months.
3.03 Settlement. Upon
the settlement of the RSUs on the RSU Vesting Date and subject to Section 4.02
of this Agreement, shares evidencing the conversion of the RSUs into Common
Stock shall, as soon as practicable, be issued electronically and registered in
the Executive’s name and in the Executive’s electronic stock plan account which
is administered by the Company through a third party provider. If,
however, the Executive elects to defer settlement of the RSUs as provided in
Section 3.04 of this Agreement, the shares of Common Stock shall be issued as
set forth in the Deferral Election Agreement entered into between the Company
and the Executive.
3.04 Deferral
Election. With the prior approval of the Committee, the
Executive may elect to defer to a later date the settlement of the RSUs that
would otherwise occur on the RSU Vesting Date. The Committee shall,
in its sole discretion, establish the rules and procedures for such settlement
deferrals.
3.05 Dividends and Other
Distributions. The Executive shall be entitled to receive cash
payments equal to any cash dividends and other distributions paid with respect
to a number of shares of Common Stock corresponding to the number of RSUs held
by the Executive, provided that if any such dividends or distributions are paid
in shares, the fair market value of such shares shall be converted into RSUs,
and further provided that such RSUs shall be subject to the same forfeiture
restrictions and restrictions on transferability as apply to the RSUs with
respect to which they relate.
ARTICLE
IV
General
4.01 Recoupment of
Incentive-Based Compensation. If the Board of Directors
determines that the Executive has committed fraud against the Company or has
been engaged in any criminal conduct that involves or is related to the Company
and such Executive is entitled to receive performance shares, stock options,
restricted stock units or cash incentive compensation (“Incentive Compensation”)
then the Company shall recover from the Executive such
Incentive
Compensation, in
whole or in part, for any period of time, as it deems appropriate under the
circumstances. The Board shall have sole discretion in determining
whether the Executive’s conduct was in compliance with the law or Company policy
and the extent to which the Company will seek recovery of the Incentive
Compensation notwithstanding any other remedies available to the
Company.
4.02 Tax Withholding
Obligations. The Executive shall be
responsible for any required withholding including, but without limitation,
taxes, FICA contributions, or the like under any federal, state or applicable
statute, rule, or regulation in connection with the award, deferral, vesting,
exercise or settlement (as the case may be) of the Awards. The
Company may withhold a number of shares of Common Stock having a fair market
value on the date that the amount is to be withheld equal to the amount
determined by the Company to be the required statutory minimum withholding; this
amount may or may not satisfy the Executive’s calendar year withholding
obligation. The Company shall not issue and shall not deliver any of
its Common Stock until and unless the proper provision for minimum required
withholding has been made.
4.03 Restriction on
Transferability. Except to the extent otherwise provided in
the Plan, the Awards may not be sold, transferred, pledged, assigned, or
otherwise alienated at any time. Any attempt to do so contrary to the
provisions hereof shall be null and void.
4.04 Rights as
Shareholder. The Executive shall not have voting or any other
rights as a shareholder of the Company with respect to the Awards. Upon exercise
of the Option and settlement of the RSUs, the Executive will obtain, with
respect to the shares of Common Stock received in such exercise or settlement,
full voting and other rights as a shareholder of the Company.
4.05 Administration. The
Committee shall have the power to interpret the Plan and this Agreement and to
adopt such rules for the administration, interpretation, and application of the
Plan as are consistent therewith and to interpret or revoke any such
rules. All actions taken and all interpretations and determinations
made by the Committee shall be final and binding upon the Executive, the
Company, and all other interested persons. No member of the Committee
shall be personally liable for any action, determination, or interpretation made
in good faith with respect to the Plan or this Agreement.
4.06 Effect on Other Employee
Benefit Plans. The value of the Awards granted pursuant to
this Agreement and the value of shares of Common Stock received in exercise or
settlement (as the case may be) of such Awards shall not be included as
compensation, earnings, salaries, or other similar terms used when calculating
the Executive’s benefits under any employee benefit plan sponsored by the
Company or any Subsidiary except as such plan otherwise expressly
provides. The Company expressly reserves its rights to amend, modify,
or terminate any of the Company’s or any Subsidiary’s employee benefit
plans.
4.07 No Employment
Rights. The Awards granted pursuant to this Agreement shall
not give the Executive any right to remain employed by the Company or a
Subsidiary.
4.08 Amendment. This Agreement may be
amended only by a writing executed by the Company and the Executive which
specifically states that it is amending this
Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Agreement may be
amended solely by the Committee by a writing which specifically states that it
is amending this Agreement, so long as a copy of such amendment is delivered to
the Executive, and provided that no such amendment adversely affecting the
rights of the Executive hereunder may be made without the Executive’s written
consent. Without limiting the foregoing, the Committee reserves the
right to change, by written notice to the Executive, the provisions of the
Awards or this Agreement in any way it may deem necessary or advisable to carry
out the purpose of the grant as a result of any change in applicable laws or
regulations or any future law, regulation, ruling, or judicial decision,
provided that any such change shall be applicable only to Awards which are then
subject to restrictions as provided herein.
4.09 Notices. Any notice to be given
under the terms of this Agreement to the Company shall be addressed to the
Company in care of its Secretary. Any notice to be given to Executive
shall be addressed to Executive at the address listed in the employer’s records
or to the Executive’s electronic stock plan account held at the Company’s third
party provider. By a notice given pursuant to this Section 4.09,
either party may designate a different address for notices. Any
notice shall have been deemed given when actually delivered.
4.10 Severability. If all or any part of
this Agreement or the Plan is declared by any court or governmental authority to
be unlawful or invalid, such unlawfulness or invalidity shall not invalidate any
portion of this Agreement or the Plan not declared to be unlawful or
invalid. Any Section of this Agreement (or part of such a Section) so
declared to be unlawful or invalid shall, if possible, be construed in a manner
which will give effect to the terms of such Section or part of a Section to the
fullest extent possible while remaining lawful and valid.
4.11 Construction. The Options are being
issued pursuant to Article 6 (Stock Options) of the Plan and the RSUs are being
issued pursuant to Article 8 (Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units) of
the Plan. Both Awards are subject to the terms of the
Plan. The Executive acknowledges receipt of the Plan booklet which
contains the entire Plan, and the Executive represents and warrants that he has
read the Plan. Additional copies of the Plan are available upon request during
normal business hours at the principal executive offices of the
Company. To the extent that any provision of this Agreement violates
or is inconsistent with an express provision of the Plan, the Plan provision
shall govern and any inconsistent provision in this Agreement shall be of no
force or effect.
4.12 Miscellaneous.
(a) The Board may terminate,
amend, or modify the Plan; provided, however, that no such termination,
amendment, or modification of the Plan may in any way adversely affect the
Executive’s rights under this Agreement without the Executive’s written
approval.
(b) This Agreement shall be
subject to all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, and to such approvals by
any governmental agencies or national securities exchanges as may be
required.
(c) All obligations of the
Company under the Plan and this Agreement, with respect to the Awards, shall be
binding on any successor to the Company, whether the existence of such successor
is the result of a direct or indirect purchase, merger, consolidation, or
otherwise, of all or substantially all of the business and/or assets of the
Company.
(d) To the extent not
preempted by federal law, this Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in
accordance with, the laws of the Province of Ontario.
4.13 French
Language. The present agreement has been drafted in English at
the express wish of the parties. Le présent contrat a été rédigé en
anglais à la demande expresse des parties.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed
and delivered this Agreement effective as of the day and year first above
written.
|
EXECUTIVE:
|
|
W.W.
GRAINGER, INC.
|
| |
|
|
|
___________________________________
|
|
By:_______________________________________________ |
|
|
|
James T.
Ryan
Chairman,
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Date:______________________________
|
|
Date:______________________________________________ |
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
10b (xx)
W.W.
GRAINGER, INC.
PERFORMANCE
SHARE AWARD AGREEMENT
This Performance
Share Award Agreement (this “Agreement”) is entered into as of ______________
between W.W. Grainger, Inc., an Illinois corporation (the “Company”) and the
undersigned Company executive (the “Executive”).
Pursuant to the
W.W. Grainger, Inc. 2005 Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), the Company desires to
award to the Executive as hereinafter provided certain performance shares (the
“Performance Shares”), entitling the Executive to receive shares of the
Company’s common stock (“Common Stock”) based upon the Company’s attainment of
certain long-term performance goals. This award of Performance
Shares is in consideration of the Executive’s agreement to enter into an Unfair
Competition Agreement (the “Unfair Competition Agreement”) between the Company
and the Executive concurrently with this Agreement. In turn, the Executive
desires to enter into the Unfair Competition Agreement and accept the award of
Performance Shares, on the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, the
Plan and the Unfair Competition Agreement. Capitalized terms used but
not defined in this Agreement have the meanings specified in the
Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, in
consideration of the mutual promises set forth below and in the Unfair
Competition Agreement, the parties hereto agree as follows:
|
|
1. General. This award is governed by and subject to the
terms and conditions of this Agreement, the Plan
and the Unfair Competition Agreement (the terms of which are hereby
incorporated herein by reference). In general, the
Executive will be entitled to receive a number of Performance Shares
determined by the Company’s performance against its sales growth target
(as described in Section 2 below), with the vesting of those Performance
Shares being subject to the Company’s achievement of its return on
invested capital target (as described in Section 3
below).
|
|
|
2. Grant of
Performance Shares; 2011 Sales Target. The Company
hereby awards to the Executive a total of _______ Performance Shares (the
“Target Number”), such number being subject to possible adjustment as
follows. The actual number of Performance Shares which the
Executive will receive will depend on the Company’s total net sales during
its 2011 fiscal year. Such number will be calculated in
accordance with the following
table:
|
|
If,
the Company’s 2011 sales are at:
|
Then
the number of
Performance
Shares will be:
|
|
Less than $XX
Billion
|
Zero
(0)
|
|
$XX
Billion
|
Fifty percent
(50%) of the Target Number
|
|
$XX
Billion
|
One hundred
percent (100%) of the Target
Number
|
|
$XX Billion
or more
|
Two hundred
percent (200%) of the Target
Number
|
Amounts between the
foregoing numbers will be interpolated as necessary. For example, if
2011 net sales are $XX Billion, then the Executive would receive seventy-five
percent (75%) of the Target Number of Performance Shares.
|
|
3. Vesting; ROIC
Target. The vesting of the Performance Shares will
depend upon the Company’s average return on invested capital (“ROIC”)
during the period of three fiscal years beginning with the 2010 fiscal
year, i.e., the Company’s 2010, 2011 and 2012 fiscal years (the “Measuring
Period”). For this purpose, ROIC means the Company’s operating
earnings divided by its net working assets. Vesting will be
determined in accordance with the following
table:
|
|
If
the Company’s average ROIC
during
the Measuring Period is:
|
Then
the following percentage of
Performance
Shares will vest:
|
|
Less than
eighteen percent (18%)
|
Zero
(0)
|
|
Eighteen
percent (18%) or more
|
One hundred
percent (100%)
|
Amounts between the
foregoing numbers will not be
interpolated. In other words, the Performance Shares will either vest
at one hundred percent (100%) or they will not vest at all. If the
Performance Shares vest, then in settlement of the Performance Shares, the
Executive will receive a number of shares of Common Stock equal to the number of
Performance Shares determined under Section 2 above, subject, however, to the
withholding provisions below. If the Performance Shares do not vest,
then they will be forfeited in full and the Executive shall have no further
rights with respect to the award hereunder.
|
|
4. Receipt by the
Executive of the Plan. The Executive acknowledges
receipt of the Plan booklet which contains the entire Plan. The Executive
represents and warrants that he has read the Plan and that he agrees that
all Performance Shares awarded under it shall be subject to all of the
terms and conditions of the Plan, including but not limited to the
exclusive right of the Committee to interpret and determine the terms and
provisions of the Performance Share Award Agreements and the Plan and to
make all determinations necessary or advisable for the administration of
the Plan, all of which interpretations and determinations shall be final
and binding. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing,
the Committee shall have the discretion to adjust the terms and conditions
of awards of Performance Shares to correct for any windfalls or shortfalls
in such awards which, in the Committee’s determination, arise from factors
beyond the awardees’ control, provided, however, that the Committee’s
authority with respect to any award to a “covered employee,” as defined in
Section 162(m)(3) of the Code, shall be limited to decreasing, and not
increasing, such award.
|
|
|
5. Tax Withholding
Obligations. If the Performance Shares shall vest, the
Executive shall be responsible for any required withholding
including, but without limitation, taxes, FICA contributions, or the like
under any federal, state or applicable statute, rule, or
regulation. Upon such vesting, the Company may
withhold a number of shares of Common Stock having a fair market value on
the date that the amount is to be withheld equal to the amount determined
by the Company to be the required statutory minimum withholding; this
amount may or may not satisfy the Executive’s calendar year withholding
obligation. The Company shall not issue and shall not deliver
any of its Common Stock upon the vesting and settlement of the Performance
Shares until and unless the proper provision for minimum required
withholding has been made.
|
|
|
6. Recoupment
of Incentive-based Compensation.
|
|
|
a.
|
If the Board
of Directors determines that the Executive has committed fraud against the
Company or has been engaged in any criminal conduct that involves or is
related to the Company and such Executive is entitled to receive
performance shares, stock options, restricted stock units or cash
incentive compensation (“Incentive Compensation”) then the Company shall
recover from the Executive such Incentive Compensation, in whole or in
part, for any period of time, as it deems appropriate under the
circumstances. The Board shall have sole discretion in
determining whether the Executive’s conduct was in compliance with the law
or Company policy and the extent to which the Company will seek recovery
of the Incentive Compensation notwithstanding any other remedies available
to the Company.
|
|
|
b.
|
In the event
of a restatement of materially inaccurate financial results, the Board has
the discretion to recover cash incentive payments or the settlement of
performance shares (“Incentive Payments”) that were paid or settled to the
Executive during the period covered by the restatement as set forth
herein. If the payment or settlement of Incentive Payments
would have been lower had the achievement of applicable financial
performance goals been calculated based on such restated financial
results, the Board may, if it determines appropriate in its sole
discretion, recover the portion of the paid or settled Incentive Payments
in excess of the payment or settlement that would have been made based on
the restated financial results. The Company will not seek to
recover Incentive Payments received or settled more than three years after
the date of the initial filing that contained the incorrect financial
results.
|
7. Other
Terms and Conditions Applicable to the Performance Shares.
|
|
a.
|
Rights of
Shareholder. The Executive shall not have any voting
rights with respect to the Performance Shares. The Executive
shall have no right to receive dividend equivalent payments with respect
to the Performance Shares.
|
|
|
b.
|
Termination of
Employment. If the Executive’s employment terminates
during the Measuring Period for any reason other than retirement,
disability or death, then the Performance Shares will be forfeited in full
and the Executive shall have no further rights with respect to the award
hereunder.
|
|
|
c.
|
Retirement/Death. If
the Executive’s employment with the Company terminates during the
Measuring Period by reason of retirement or death, then the Executive or
the Executive’s estate will be entitled to receive in settlement of the
Performance Shares a number of shares of Common Stock equal to the product
of (x) the number of Performance Shares, if any, which subsequently vest
under Section 3 above, multiplied by
(y) a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of months during the
Measuring Period that the Executive was employed by the Company and the
denominator of which is the total number of months in the Measuring
Period, i.e., 36 months. For purposes of the foregoing
calculation, the Executive will be deemed to have been employed by the
Company during the month that his employment terminates if, and only if,
such termination occurs on or after the fifteenth (15th)
calendar day of that month.
|
|
|
d.
|
Disability. If
the Executive’s employment with the Company terminates during the
Measuring Period by reason of disability (defined below), then the
Executive will be entitled to receive in settlement of the
Performance Shares a number of shares of Common Stock calculated in the
same manner as under Subsection c immediately above, provided, however,
that if such
|
termination of
employment occurs during the first fiscal year of the Measuring Period, then for
purposes of such calculation the number of Performance Shares referred to in
clause (x) of such calculation shall be determined as though the Company had
met, but not exceeded, its sales growth target and 100 percent of such
Performance Shares had vested. For purposes of the foregoing, the
term “disability” means the Executive’s inability to engage in any substantial
gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental
impairment that can be expected to result in death or that has lasted for a
continuous period of not less than twelve (12) months.
|
|
8. Severability. The
provisions of the Agreement shall be severable, and in the event that any
provision of it is found to be unenforceable, all other provisions shall
be binding and enforceable on the parties as drafted. In the
event that any provision is found to be unenforceable, the parties consent
to the Court’s modification of that provision in order to make the
provision enforceable, subject to the limitations of the Court’s powers
under the law.
|
|
|
9. Venue. The
Executive acknowledges that, in the event that a determination of the
enforceability of this Agreement is sought, or any other judicial
proceedings are brought pertaining to this Agreement, the Company has the
choice of venue and the preferred venue for such proceedings is Cook
County, Illinois.
|
|
|
10. Governing
Law. This Agreement shall be
governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of
Illinois, excluding any conflicts or choice of law rules or principles
thereof.
|
IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Performance Share Award Agreement
to be executed by a duly authorized Officer of the Company and the Executive
hereby agrees to all the terms and conditions set forth above.
W.W.
GRAINGER, INC.
By:____________________________________
James T. Ryan
Chairman, President and Chief Executive
Officer
____________________________________
Executive
(Signature)
____________________________________
Executive (Print
Name)
____________________________________
Date
Exhibit
10b(xxi)
YANG
CHIN CHEN
President
Grainger Industrial
Supply
December 14,
2007
Donald G.
MacPherson
171
Wentworth
Glencoe, IL
60022
Dear
D.G.:
I
am pleased to extend an offer of employment to you as W.W. Grainger, Inc.’s
Senior Vice President, Supply Chain. I look forward to working with
you, and know that your leadership and enthusiasm will make a difference at
Grainger. This position reports directly to me. The
following outlines the key provisions of our employment offer.
Your base salary in
the amount of $25,834 will be paid monthly at the end of each
month. On an
annualized basis, this is $310,008. Base salaries are
generally reviewed each year in April. You will be considered for a
salary review in April of 2009.
You will also
receive a hiring incentive in the amount of $75,000, less applicable tax
withholding. This payment will be made one year from your hire
date. Additionally, you will receive a second hiring incentive in the
amount of $75,000, less applicable tax withholding, two years from your hire
date.
In
addition to your base salary, you will be eligible to participate in our Company Management Incentive Program
(MIP) which has a current target award opportunity of 50% of your
annualized base salary as of December 31. Payments under this program
are based upon two measures: Return On Invested Capital (ROIC) &
Sales Growth. Your eligibility begins in 2008, which is payable in
March of each following year.
You will be
nominated to participate in the W.W. Grainger, Inc. Long Term Incentive
Program. You will qualify for the award which will be issued in
April. The program has three components: Stock Options,
Restricted Stock Units and Performance Shares. Each component
represents 40%, 30%, and 30% of the market competitive annual package,
respectively. Awards under the program are subject to the provisions of
the Plan and are designed to align the interests of key managers with those of
the shareholders. For 2008, you will be awarded Stock Options (40%)
and Restricted Stock Units (60%), and for 2009, your awards will also include
Performance Shares as described above.
You will receive a
Restricted Stock Unit
Grant of 20,000 shares subject to the approval of the Compensation
Committee of
the Board. The
terms of this agreement will be provided to you upon the issuance of the
grant. The vesting restrictions on
the shares are as
follows:
|
a.
|
20,000 shares
will fully vest seven years from the grant
date.
|
|
W.W.
GRAINGER, INC. - 100 GRAINGER
PARKWAY - LAKE FOREST,
IL 60045-5201
|
|
847/535-2037 - FAX
847/535-1387- http://www.grainger.com
|
Mr.
MacPherson
December
14
Page
2.
|
b.
|
As an
officer, you will be required to hold shares in W.W. Grainger, Inc. Common Stock equal to
three times
your
annual base
salary. The restricted stock units, along with restricted stock
units you may receive as
part of your
annual
awards, will apply to this stock ownership guideline. You will
have three years from the
date of
employment to meet this
guideline.
|
You will be
eligible to participate in the Executive Death Benefit Plan
which provides the following benefit:
|
a.
|
A
pre-retirement monthly survivor income benefit upon your death (equal to
50% of your base salary plus 50% of
your MIP
Target) payable to your named beneficiary for a period of 10
years.
|
|
b.
|
A
post-retirement benefit payable upon your death that is (equal to) 100% of
annual cash compensation
(including
any incentive payments under MIP) in your final full year of
service.
|
|
c.
|
The Executive
Death Benefit Plan describes and governs the provisions of the
Plan. A copy of the Plan will be
provided to
you.
|
Additionally, as an
officer you will be eligible to receive an Automobile Allowance each
year. This allowance will be in the amount of $20,000. You will also
be eligible to be reimbursed up to $10,000 for bona fide financial counseling,
estate planning and tax preparation services you incur each
year. These payments are fully taxable to you as ordinary
income.
The Profit Sharing Plan (PST) is
the hallmark of our benefits program because it provides a value considerably
greater than equivalent plans offered at other companies. Based upon
Company profits, a contribution will be made to your PST account each
year. As a reference, since this Profit Sharing Plan was started in
1941, the average contribution has ranged from 10 to 20 percent for participants
who had 5 years of service or more.
As
a Grainger employee, you are also eligible for our benefit plans in accordance
with the provisions of each specific plan (see
attached). Additionally, you are eligible for a Supplemental Vacation
Benefit of two weeks (total four weeks vacation). If you have
any questions regarding benefits, Ellen Hirsch would be happy to talk with
you.
This offer is
contingent upon successful completion of a drug test and background
check. Enclosed please find the forms you will need for completion of
the drug test. Other forms included need to be completed and returned
in the enclosed Federal Express envelope.
|
W.W.
GRAINGER, INC. - 100 GRAINGER
PARKWAY - LAKE FOREST,
IL 60045-5201
|
|
847/535-2037 - FAX
847/535-1387- http://www.grainger.com
|
Mr.
MacPherson
December
14
Page
3.
D.G., we are
extremely pleased to extend this offer to you. I am sure that you
will find working for Grainger a rewarding and exciting experience. I
look forward to you joining our team on or around February 4, 2008.
Regards,
Y.C.
Chen
President,
GIS
copy:
Ellen Hirsch
Kim Cysewski
Lary Pilon
Scott
Witz
attachments
|
W.W.
GRAINGER, INC. - 100 GRAINGER
PARKWAY - LAKE FOREST,
IL 60045-5201
|
|
847/535-2037 - FAX
847/535-1387- http://www.grainger.com
|
Exhibit
10b (xxiv)
SUMMARY
DESCRIPTION OF THE
2010
COMPANY MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE PROGRAM
|
I.
|
Introduction
|
|
|
The 2010
Company Management Incentive Program (MIP) was designed to focus on two
key factors that drive improvements in shareholder value: return on
invested capital (ROIC) and sales
growth.
|
|
II.
|
Objectives
|
|
|
The MIP is
designed to:
|
|
|
|
Encourage
decision-making focused on producing a favorable rate of ROIC and on
growing the business rapidly, thus leading to improvements in shareholder
value.
|
|
|
|
Influence
participants to make decisions consistent with shareholders’
interests.
|
|
|
|
Align
management with Company objectives.
|
|
|
|
Attract and
retain the talent required to achieve the Company’s
objectives.
|
|
III.
|
Eligibility
|
|
|
Positions
that participate in this program are those that have significant impact on
the Company. Eligibility for participation in this program is based on the
determination of management. Criteria for inclusion are market practice,
impact of the role on overall Company results, and internal practice.
Participation in this program is subject to the Terms and
Conditions.
|
|
IV.
|
Performance
Measures
Shareholder
value will improve most dramatically if the Company can achieve two goals
simultaneously:
|
|
|
1.
|
Produce a
constantly improving rate of ROIC,
and
|
|
|
2.
|
Grow the
business rapidly.
|
|
|
The 2010 MIP
will be based on ROIC and sales growth. The payout earned is the sum of
the ROIC and sales growth results. This can be represented algebraically
as follows:
|
|
|
Total Payout
= ROIC Payout + Sales Growth Payout
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROIC is defined as
operating earnings divided by net working
assets:
|
|
ROIC
|
=
|
Operating
Earnings
Net Working
Assets
|
|
|
|
The ROIC
component will range from 0% to 60% of a participant’s total Target
Incentive.
|
|
|
Sales growth is defined
as year-over-year performance:
|
|
Sales
growth
|
=
|
Total Company Sales,
Current Year
Total
Company Sales, Prior
Year
|
-1
|
|
|
|
|
|
The sales
growth component will range from 0% to 150% of a participant’s total
Target Incentive.
|
| |
|
| |
The overall
incentive amount earned is capped at 200% of a participant's total Target
Incentive. |
|
|
|
|
|
Management
would be allowed to recommend discretionary adjustments to the ROIC and
sales growth portions of the payout, to correct for any windfalls or
shortfalls beyond the control of participants.
|
|
|
|
|
V.
|
Target Award
Opportunity
|
|
|
Target awards
for each position are based on competitive market practice and internal
considerations and are stated as a percentage of the employee’s base
salary.
|
|
IV.
|
Determination Of
Payment Amounts
|
|
|
The following
process is used to determine the payment amount for each
participant.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Step 1: Determine the
performance results for ROIC and the resultant performance to goal.
Compute the appropriate percentage of Target Incentive
earned.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Step 2: Determine the
performance results for sales growth and the resultant performance to
goal. Compute the appropriate percentage of Target Incentive
earned. Add these results to the results from Step 1 to
determine the Total % Payout.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Step 3: Calculate each
participant’s incentive amount earned as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive
Amount Earned =
Total %
Payout x (Annualized Base Salary (as of 12/31) x
Target Incentive %)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Those
employees who are eligible to participate for only part of the year will
have their incentive amount adjusted accordingly, based on the eligibility
provisions of the Terms and Conditions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Step 4: The Compensation
Committee of Management and the Compensation Committee of the Board must
approve final incentive amounts.
|
| |
|
|
|
Step 5: Once approved, final incentive
amounts are forwarded to the Employee Systems manager for payment.
|
2
Exhibit
10b (xxv)
W.W.
GRAINGER, INC.
INCENTIVE
PROGRAM RECOUPMENT AGREEMENT
This Incentive
Program Recoupment Agreement (this “Agreement”) is entered into as of
_____________ between W.W. Grainger, Inc., an Illinois corporation (the
“Company”) and the undersigned Company executive (the “Executive”).
Subject to the
Executive’s acceptance of the terms and conditions of this Agreement and the
entry into an Unfair Competition Agreement concurrent herewith (the “Unfair
Competition Agreement”), Executive will be eligible for participation in the
2010 management incentive program or any program paid on the same basis such as
a covered employee benefit program (collectively “Covered Programs”) as set
forth in either the Summary Description of the 2010 Company Management Incentive
Program (the “Summary Description”) or the Covered Employee Annual Incentive
Award Section of the 2005 Incentive Plan (the “Annual Incentive Award
Section”). In turn, the Executive desires to enter into this
Agreement and the Unfair Competition Agreement and participate in the Covered
Programs all on the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement and the
Unfair Competition Agreement and subject to the Summary Description or Annual
Incentive Award Section.
NOW, THEREFORE, in
consideration of the mutual promises set forth below and in the Unfair
Competition Agreement, the parties hereto agree as follows:
|
1.
|
General. The
Covered Programs are based on the Company’s achievement of certain
established targets as set forth in the Summary Description or the Annual
Incentive Award Section. Any payout made pursuant to the
Covered Programs are subject to terms and conditions as set forth on an
annual basis. Participation in the Covered Programs do not
guarantee a payout to the
Executive.
|
|
2.
|
Recoupment
of Incentive-based Compensation.
|
|
a.
|
If the Board
of Directors determines that the Executive has committed fraud against the
Company or has been engaged in any criminal conduct that involves or is
related to the Company and such Executive is entitled to receive
performance shares, stock options, restricted stock units or cash
incentive compensation (“Incentive Compensation”) then the Company shall
recover from the Executive such Incentive Compensation, in whole or in
part, for any period of time, as it deems appropriate under the
circumstances. The Board shall have sole discretion in
determining whether the Executive’s conduct was in compliance with the law
or Company policy and the extent to which the Company will seek recovery
of the Incentive Compensation notwithstanding any other remedies available
to the Company.
|
|
b.
|
In the event
of a restatement of materially inaccurate financial results, the Board has
the discretion to recover cash incentive payments or the settlement of
performance shares (“Incentive Payments”) that were paid or settled to the
Executive during the period covered by the restatement as set forth
herein. If the payment or settlement of Incentive Payments
would have been lower had the achievement of applicable financial
performance goals been calculated based on such restated financial
results, the Board may, if it determines appropriate in its sole
discretion, recover the portion of the paid or settled Incentive Payments
in excess of the payment or settlement that would have been made based on
the restated financial results. The Company will not seek to
recover Incentive Payments received or settled more than three years after
the date of the initial filing that contained the incorrect financial
results.
|
|
3.
|
Governing Law;
Jurisdiction. This Agreement shall be governed by and
construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Illinois. Any action
arising under or relating to this Agreement may be taken in a court of
appropriate jurisdiction, either state or federal, situated in Cook
County, Illinois. Each party hereby consents to the
jurisdiction of any court before which the action has been brought in
accordance with this Section and will accept service of process by any
method permitted by the rules of, or applicable to, such court, whether or
not such party then resides within such court’s
jurisdiction.
|
IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Incentive Program Recoupment
Agreement to be executed by a duly authorized Officer of the Company and the
Executive hereby agrees to all the terms and conditions set forth
above.
W.W.
GRAINGER, INC.
By:____________________________________
James T. Ryan
Chairman, President and Chief Executive
Officer
_____________________________________
Executive
(Signature)
_____________________________________
Executive (Print
Name)
_____________________________________
Date
2
Exhibit
3(b)
As Amended
02/17/2010
BY-LAWS
OF
W.W.
GRAINGER, INC.
ARTICLE
I
OFFICES
The principal office of the corporation shall
be located in the State of Illinois. The corporation may have such
other offices, either within or without the State of Illinois, as the business
of the corporation may require from time to time.
The registered office of the corporation
required by the Illinois Business Corporation Act to be maintained in the State
of Illinois may be, but need not be, identical with the principal office in the
State of Illinois, and the address of the registered office may be changed from
time to time by the board of directors.
ARTICLE
II
SHAREHOLDERS
SECTION 1. ANNUAL
MEETING. (a) The annual meeting of the shareholders shall
be held on the last Wednesday of April, in each year, or at such time as may be
determined by the board of directors, for the purpose of electing directors and
for the transaction of such other business as may properly come before the
meeting. If the day fixed for the annual meeting shall be a legal
holiday, such meeting shall be held on the next succeeding business
day. If the election of the directors shall not be held on the day
designated herein for any annual meeting or adjournment thereof, the board of
directors shall cause the election to be held at a meeting of the shareholders
as soon thereafter as conveniently may be.
(b) At any annual meeting or
adjournment thereof only such nominations or other business shall be conducted
as shall have been brought before the meeting (i) by or at the direction of
the board of directors or (ii) by any shareholder (x) who is entitled
to vote at the time of giving notice provided for in this Section 1(b) and
remains such until the meeting and (y) who complies with the procedures and
other requirements set forth in this Section 1(b). For nominations or
other business to be properly brought before an annual meeting or adjournment
thereof by a shareholder, the shareholder must have given timely notice thereof
in proper written form to the secretary. To be timely, a
shareholder’s notice must be delivered to or mailed and received at the
principal office of the corporation not later than the close of business on the
90th day and not earlier than the close of business on the 120th day prior to
the first anniversary
of
the prior year’s annual meeting; provided, however, that in
the event that the date of the annual meeting is more than 30 days before or
after such anniversary date, notice by the shareholder to be timely shall be
delivered not earlier than the close of business on the 120th day prior to such
annual meeting and not later than the close of business on the later of
(i) the 90th day prior to such annual meeting and (ii) the 10th day
following the date of the first public announcement of the date of the meeting;
further provided that in the case of such a shareholder’s nomination of one or
more persons for election or reelection to the board of directors at the next
annual meeting of shareholders and notwithstanding anything to the contrary in
this Section 1(b), the aforementioned shareholder’s notice shall be delivered to
or mailed and received at the principal office of the corporation not later than
the date with respect to submission of shareholders’ proposals for such next
annual meeting as set forth in the corporation’s proxy statement for the
preceding annual meeting of shareholders. In no event shall the
public announcement of an adjournment of an annual meeting, or such adjournment,
commence a new time period (or extend any time period) for the giving of a
shareholder notice as described above. To be in proper written form,
a shareholder’s notice to the secretary shall set forth in writing (x) as
to each person whom the shareholder proposes to nominate for election or
reelection as a director (i) all information concerning the shareholder’s
relationship to and transactions with such person and information relating to
such person that is required to be disclosed in solicitations of proxies for
election of directors in an election contest, or is otherwise required, in each
case pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the “Exchange Act”) (including such person’s written consent to being
named in the proxy statement as a nominee and to serving as a director if
elected), and (ii) with respect to each nominee for election or reelection
to the board of directors, include a completed and signed questionnaire,
representation and agreement required by paragraph (c) of this Section 1
(collectively, the information described in subclauses (i) and (ii) of clause
(x) is the “Nominee Information”); (y) as to any other business the shareholder
proposes to bring before the meeting a brief description of the business desired
to be brought before the meeting, the text of the proposal or business
(including the text of any resolutions proposed for consideration and, if such
business includes a proposal to amend the by-laws of the corporation, the text
of the proposed amendment), the reasons for conducting such business at the
meeting, and any material interest in such business of such shareholder and the
beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the nomination or proposal is made
(collectively, the information described in clause (y) is the “Other Business
Information”); and (z) as to the shareholder giving the notice and the
beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the nomination or proposal is made
(i) the name and address of such shareholder, as they appear on the
corporation’s books, and of such beneficial owner; (ii) the class and
number of shares of the corporation which are owned beneficially and of record
by such shareholder and such beneficial owner and, in the case of such
shareholder, his commitment to remain a shareholder through the date of the
shareholders’ meeting with respect to which his shareholder’s notice was given;
(iii) any option, warrant, convertible security, stock appreciation right,
or similar right with an exercise or conversion privilege or a settlement
payment or mechanism at a price related to any class or series of shares of the
corporation or with a value derived in whole or in part from the value of any
class or series of shares of the corporation,
whether or not such
instrument or right shall be subject to settlement in the underlying class or
series of capital stock of the corporation or otherwise directly or indirectly
owned beneficially by such shareholder or beneficial owner and any other direct
or indirect opportunity to profit or share in any profit derived from any
increase or decrease in the value of shares of the corporation, including,
without limitation, any derivative instrument, swap, short interest, hedge or
profit sharing arrangement (a “Derivative Instrument”); (iv) any proxy,
contract, arrangement, understanding, or relationship pursuant to which such
shareholder or beneficial owner has a right to vote any shares of any security
of the corporation; (v) any short interest of such shareholder or
beneficial owner in any security of the corporation (for purposes of this
by-law, a person shall be deemed to have a short interest in a security if such
person directly or indirectly, through any agreement, arrangement,
understanding, relationship or otherwise, has the opportunity to profit or share
in any profit derived from any decrease in the value of the subject security),
and whether any other agreement, arrangement or understanding (including any
borrowing or lending of shares) has been made, the effect or intent of which is
to mitigate loss to or manage risk or benefit of share price changes for, or to
increase or decrease the voting power of, such shareholder or any such
beneficial owner with respect to any share of stock of the corporation;
(vi) any rights to dividends on the shares of the corporation owned
beneficially by such shareholder or beneficial owner that are separated or
separable from the underlying shares of the corporation; (vii) any
proportionate interest in shares of the corporation or Derivative Instruments
held, directly or indirectly, by a general or limited partnership in which such
shareholder or beneficial owner is a general partner or, directly or indirectly,
beneficially owns an interest in a general partner; (viii) any
performance-related fees (other than an asset-based fee) that such shareholder
or beneficial owner is entitled to based on any increase or decrease in the
value of shares of the corporation or Derivative Instruments, if any, as of the
date of such notice, including without limitation any such interests held by
members of such shareholder’s or beneficial owner’s immediate family sharing the
same household; (ix) a description of all agreements, arrangements and
understandings between such shareholder or beneficial owner, if any, and any
other person or persons (including their names) in connection with or relating
to the proposed action or nomination by such shareholder; (x) a
representation as to whether the shareholder or the beneficial owner, if any,
intends, or is or intends to be part of a group that intends, (A) to
deliver a proxy statement and/or form of proxy to holders of at least the
percentage of the corporation’s outstanding capital stock required to approve or
adopt the proposal and/or (B) otherwise to solicit proxies from
shareholders in support of such proposal; and (xi) a representation that
such shareholder is a holder of record of stock of the corporation, entitled to
vote at such meeting, and intends to appear in person or by proxy at the
shareholders’ meeting to make such nominations or bring such business before the
meeting (collectively, the information described in subclauses (i) through (xi)
of clause (z) is the “Shareholder/Beneficial Owner Information”).
A shareholder providing notice of a proposed
nomination for election to the board of directors of the corporation or other
business proposed to be brought before a meeting shall further update and
supplement such notice, if necessary, so that the information provided or
required to be provided in such notice under this paragraph (b)
shall be true and
correct as of the record date for the meeting and as of the date that is ten
business days prior to the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof,
and such update and supplement shall be delivered to the secretary at the
principal executive office of the corporation not later than five business days
after the record date for the meeting (in the case of the update and supplement
required to be made as of the record date), and not later than eight business
days prior to the date for the meeting or any adjournment or postponement
thereof (in the case of the update and supplement required to be made as of ten
business days prior to the meeting or any adjournment or postponement
thereof). The corporation may also require any proposed nominee for
election to the board of directors of the corporation to consent to a background
check (which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld) and to furnish such
other information as may be reasonably required for the corporation to determine
the eligibility of such proposed nominee to serve as an independent director of
the corporation or that could be material to a reasonable shareholder’s
understanding of the qualifications and/or independence, or lack thereof, of
such nominee.
(c) To be eligible to be a nominee
for election or reelection as a director of the corporation, the prospective
nominee, or someone acting on such prospective nominee’s behalf, must deliver
(in accordance with any applicable time periods prescribed for delivery of
notice under this by-law) to the secretary at the principal executive office of
the corporation a written questionnaire with respect to the background and
qualification of such person and the background of any other person or entity on
whose behalf the nomination is being made (which questionnaire shall be provided
by the secretary upon written request). The prospective nominee must also
provide a written representation and agreement, in the form provided by the
secretary upon written request, that such prospective nominee: (A) is not
and will not become a party to (1) any agreement, arrangement or
understanding with, and has not given any commitment or assurance to, any person
or entity as to how such prospective nominee, if elected as a director of the
corporation, will act or vote on any issue or question (a “Voting Commitment”)
that has not been disclosed to the corporation or (2) any Voting Commitment
that could limit or interfere with such prospective nominee’s ability to comply,
if elected as a director of the corporation, with such prospective nominee’s
fiduciary duties under applicable law; (B) is not and will not become a
party to any agreement, arrangement or understanding with any person or entity
other than the corporation with respect to any direct or indirect compensation,
reimbursement or indemnification in connection with service or action as a
director that has not been disclosed therein; and (C) in such person’s
individual capacity and on behalf of any person or entity on whose behalf the
nomination is being made, would be in compliance if elected as a director of the
corporation, and will comply with all applicable publicly disclosed corporate
governance, conflict of interest, corporate opportunity, confidentiality and
stock ownership and trading policies and guidelines of the
corporation.
SECTION 2. SPECIAL
MEETINGS. Special meetings of the shareholders may be called by
(i) the chairman of the board, (ii) the board of directors, or
(iii) by timely notice thereof in proper written form to the secretary, by
the holders (a “One Fifth
Holder”) of not
less than one-fifth of all the outstanding shares of the corporation entitled at
the time of such call and continuously thereafter until the date of the meeting
so called to vote on the matter for which the meeting is called. The
purpose or purposes for which a special meeting is called shall be specified in
the notice of meeting given with respect thereto pursuant to Section 5 of this
Article II, and no other business may be transacted at any such
meeting.
To be timely, a call by a One Fifth Holder must
be delivered or mailed and received at the principal office of the corporation
not later than the close of business on the 90th day,
and not earlier than the close of business on the 120th day,
before the date of the special meeting being called.
To be in proper written form, a One Fifth
Holder’s notice to the secretary shall set forth in writing (x) Nominee
Information as to each person whom the One Fifth Holder proposes to nominate for
election or reelection as a director, provided that the corporation may require
any proposed nominee to furnish such other information as may be reasonably
required by the corporation, to determine the qualifications of such nominee to
serve as a director of the corporation; (y) Other Business Information as to any
other business the One Fifth Holder proposes to bring before the meeting; and
(z) Shareholder/Beneficial Owner Information as to the One Fifth Holder giving
the notice and the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the nomination or
proposal is made.
A
shareholder providing notice of a proposed nomination for election to the board
of directors of the corporation or other business proposed to be brought before
a meeting shall further update and supplement such notice, if necessary, so that
the information provided or required to be provided in such notice under this
section shall be true and correct as of the record date for the meeting and as
of the date that is ten business days prior to the meeting or any adjournment or
postponement thereof, and such update and supplement shall be delivered to the
secretary at the principal executive office of the corporation not later than
five business days after the record date for the meeting (in the case of the
update and supplement required to be made as of the record date), and not later
than eight business days prior to the date for the meeting or any adjournment or
postponement thereof (in the case of the update and supplement required to be
made as of ten business days prior to the meeting or any adjournment or
postponement thereof). The corporation may also require any proposed
nominee for election to the board of directors of the corporation to consent to
a background check (which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld) and to
furnish such other information as may be reasonably required for the corporation
to determine the eligibility of such proposed nominee to serve as an independent
director of the corporation or that could be material to a reasonable
shareholder’s understanding of the qualifications and/or independence, or lack
thereof, of such nominee.
SECTION 3. MEETINGS -
GENERAL. (a) Only such persons who are nominated in accordance with
the procedures set forth in this Article II (or in Article III, Section 8) shall
be eligible to be elected as directors at a meeting of shareholders and only
such business shall be conducted at a meeting of shareholders as shall have
been
brought before the
meeting in accordance with the applicable procedures set forth in this Article
II. The presiding officer of the meeting shall have the power and
duty to determine whether a nomination or any business proposed to be brought
before the meeting was made, or proposed, as the case may be, in accordance with
the procedures set forth in this Article II and, if such presiding officer
determines that any proposed nomination or business is not in compliance with
this Article II, to declare that such defective nomination or proposal shall be
disregarded and any such nomination or business not properly brought before the
meeting shall not be transacted.
(b) For purposes of this Article II,
“public announcement” shall mean disclosure in a press release reported by the
Dow Jones News Service, Associated Press, Reuters or comparable national news
service or in a document publicly filed by the corporation with the Securities
and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 13, 14 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act,
and “group” shall have the meaning ascribed to such term under Section 13(d)(3)
of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations thereunder.
(c) Notwithstanding the foregoing
provisions of this Article II, a shareholder shall also comply with all
applicable requirements of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations
thereunder with respect to the matters set forth in this Article
II. The requirements of this Article II shall apply to all
shareholder nominations and all shareholder proposals to be considered at a
meeting of shareholders, whether or not such nominations or proposals are sought
to be included in the corporation’s proxy statement; provided, however, that
nothing in this Article II shall be deemed to affect any rights of (x)
shareholders to request inclusion of proposals in the corporation’s proxy
statement pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act, or (y) the holders of
any series of Preferred Stock to elect directors under specified
circumstances. The foregoing notice requirements of this Article II
shall be deemed satisfied with respect to a shareholder proposal if the
shareholder has notified the corporation of the shareholder’s intention to
present such proposal at an annual meeting in compliance with Rule 14a-8
promulgated under the Exchange Act and such shareholder’s proposal has been
included in a proxy statement that has been prepared by the corporation to
solicit proxies for such annual meeting. The provisions of this
Article II shall also govern what constitutes timely notice for purposes of Rule
14a-4(c) of the Exchange Act.
SECTION 4. PLACE OF
MEETING. The board of directors may designate any place, either
within or without the State of Illinois, as the place of meeting for any annual
meeting or for any special meeting called by the board of
directors. If no designation is made, or if a special meeting be
otherwise called, the place of meeting shall be the principal office of the
corporation in the State of Illinois.
SECTION 5. NOTICE OF
MEETINGS. Written notice stating the place, day and hour of the
meeting and, in the case of a special meeting, the purpose or purposes for which
the meeting is called, shall be delivered not less than ten nor more than sixty
days before the date of the meeting, or in the case of a merger, consolidation,
share exchange, dissolution or sale, lease or exchange of assets, not less than
twenty days nor more than sixty days before the date of the meeting, either
personally or by mail, by
or
at the direction of the chairman of the board, or the secretary, or in the event
that a special meeting has been properly called by a One Fifth Holder in
accordance with Section 2 of this Article II, and notice of such meeting has not
been given by the secretary within 65 days after the call of such meeting,
notice thereof shall be given between the 66th and
the 75th day
after such call by the persons calling the meeting, to each shareholder of
record entitled to vote at such meeting. If mailed, such notice shall
be deemed to be delivered when deposited in the United States mail, addressed to
the shareholder at his address as it appears on the records of the corporation,
with postage thereon prepaid.
SECTION 6. FIXING OF RECORD
DATE. For the purpose of determining shareholders entitled to notice
of or to vote at any meeting of shareholders, or shareholders entitled to
receive payment of any dividend, or in order to make a determination of
shareholders for any other proper purpose, the board of directors of the
corporation may fix in advance a date as the record date for any such
determination of shareholders, such date in any case to be not more than sixty
days and, in case of a meeting of shareholders, not less than ten days, or in
the case of a merger, consolidation, share exchange, dissolution or sale, lease
or exchange of assets, not less than twenty days, prior to the date on which the
particular action, requiring such determination of shareholders, is to be
taken. If no record date is fixed for the determination of
shareholders entitled to notice of or entitled to vote at a meeting of
shareholders, or entitled to receive payment of a dividend, the date on which
notice of the meeting is mailed or the date on which the resolution of the board
of directors declaring such dividend is adopted, as the case may be, shall be
the record date for such determination of shareholders. When a
determination of shareholders entitled to vote at any meeting of shareholders
has been made as provided above, such determination shall apply to any
adjournment thereof.
SECTION 7. VOTING
LISTS. The officer or agent having charge of the transfer books for
shares of the corporation shall make within twenty days after the record date
for a meeting of shareholders, or ten days before such meeting of shareholders,
whichever is earlier, a complete list of the shareholders entitled to vote at
such meeting, arranged in alphabetical order, with the address of and the number
of shares held by each, which list, for a period of ten days prior to such
meeting, shall be kept on file at the principal office of the corporation in the
State of Illinois and shall be subject to inspection by any shareholder at any
time during usual business hours and to copying at the shareholder's expense.
Such list shall also be produced and kept open at the time and place of the
meeting and shall be subject to the inspection of any shareholder during the
whole time of the meeting. The original share ledger or transfer
book, or a duplicate thereof kept in the State, shall be prima facie evidence as
to who are the shareholders entitled to examine such list or share ledger, or
transfer book or to vote at any meeting of shareholders.
SECTION 8. QUORUM. A
majority of the outstanding shares of the corporation, entitled to vote on a
matter, represented in person or by proxy, shall constitute a quorum at any
meeting of shareholders.
When any meeting is convened, the presiding
officer, if directed by the Board, may adjourn the meeting without a vote of
shareholders if (a) no quorum is present for the transaction of business, or (b)
the Board determines that adjournment is necessary or appropriate to enable the
shareholders (1) to consider fully information which the Board determines has
not been made sufficiently or timely available to shareholders, or (2) otherwise
to exercise effectively their voting rights. At any such adjourned
meeting at which there is a quorum, any business may be transacted that might
have been transacted at the meeting originally called.
SECTION 9. PROXIES. A
shareholder may appoint a proxy to vote or otherwise act for the shareholder by
delivering a valid appointment to the person so appointed or such person's
agent; provided that no shareholder may name more than three persons as proxies
to attend and to vote the shareholder's shares at any meeting of
shareholders. Such appointment may be by any means, including means
of electronic transmission, permitted by law. No proxy shall be valid
after the expiration of eleven months from the date thereof unless otherwise
provided in the proxy.
SECTION 10. VOTING OF
SHARES. Subject to the provisions of Section 12 of this Article,
each outstanding share, regardless of class, shall be entitled to one vote upon
each matter submitted to vote at a meeting of shareholders.
SECTION 11. VOTING OF SHARES BY
CERTAIN HOLDERS. Shares standing in the name of another corporation,
domestic or foreign, may be voted by such officer, agent, or proxy as the
by-laws of such corporation may prescribe, or, in the absence of such provision,
as the board of directors of such corporation may determine.
Shares standing in the name of a deceased
person may be voted by his administrator or executor, either in person or by
proxy. Shares standing in the name of a guardian, conservator, or
trustee may be voted by such fiduciary, either in person or by proxy, but no
guardian, conservator, or trustee shall be entitled, as such fiduciary, to vote
shares held by him without a transfer of such shares into his name.
Shares standing in the name of a receiver may
be voted by such receiver, and shares held by or under the control of a receiver
may be voted by such receiver without the transfer thereof into his name if
authority to do so be contained in an appropriate order of the court by which
such receiver was appointed.
A shareholder whose shares are pledged shall be
entitled to vote such shares until the shares have been transferred into the
name of the pledgee, and thereafter the pledgee shall be entitled to vote the
shares so transferred.
Shares of its own stock belonging to this
corporation shall not be voted, directly or indirectly, at any meeting and shall
not be counted in determining the total number of outstanding shares at any
given time, but shares of its own stock held by it in a fiduciary
capacity may be
voted and shall be counted in determining the total number of outstanding shares
at any given time.
SECTION 12. CUMULATIVE
VOTING. In all elections for directors, every shareholder shall have
the right to vote, in person or by proxy, the number of shares owned by him, for
as many persons as there are directors to be elected, or to cumulate said
shares, and give one candidate as many votes as the number of directors
multiplied by the number of his shares shall equal, or to distribute them on the
same principle among as many candidates as he shall see fit.
SECTION 13. VOTING BY
BALLOT. Voting on any question or in any election may be by voice,
unless the officer or other person presiding over the meeting shall order or any
shareholder shall demand that voting be by ballot.
SECTION 14. PRESIDING OFFICERS AND
ORDER OF BUSINESS. All meetings of shareholders shall be called to
order and presided over by the chairman of the board, or in his absence, by the
lead director or by another director designated by the board, or in the absence
of such designated director or if no such designation has been made, by the
senior chairman of the board, if any. The secretary of the
corporation shall act as secretary of the meeting, but in the absence of the
secretary of the corporation, the presiding officer may appoint a secretary of
the meeting.
SECTION 15. PROCEDURAL
MATTERS. At each meeting of shareholders, the presiding officer shall
fix and announce the date and time of the opening and the closing of the polls
for each matter upon which the shareholders will vote at the meeting and shall
determine the order of business and all other matters of
procedure. Except to the extent inconsistent with any such rules and
regulations as adopted by the Board, the presiding officer may establish rules,
which need not be in writing, to maintain order for the conduct of the meeting,
including, without limitation, restricting attendance to bona fide shareholders
of record and their proxies and other persons in attendance at the invitation of
the presiding officer and making rules governing speeches and
debates. The presiding officer acts in his or her absolute discretion
and his or her rulings are not subject to appeal.
ARTICLE
III
DIRECTORS
SECTION 1. GENERAL
POWERS. The business and affairs of the corporation shall be managed
under the direction of its board of directors.
SECTION 2. NUMBER, TENURE AND
QUALIFICATIONS. (a) The number of directors of the corporation
shall be not less than nine nor more than fourteen. The number of
directors may be fixed or changed from time to time, within the minimum and
maximum, by the directors or the shareholders without amending these
by-laws. Each director shall hold office until the next annual
meeting of shareholders or until his
successor shall
have been elected and qualified. Directors need not be residents of
Illinois or shareholders of the corporation.
(b) A lead director shall be
annually elected by and from the independent directors.
SECTION 3. REGULAR
MEETINGS. A regular meeting of the board of directors shall be held
without other notice than this by-law, immediately after the annual meeting of
shareholders. The board of directors may provide by resolution, the
time and place, either within or without the State of Illinois, for the holding
of additional regular meetings without other notice than such
resolution.
SECTION 4. SPECIAL
MEETINGS. Special meetings of the board of directors may be called by
or at the request of the chairman of the board, the lead director, or any two
directors. The person or persons authorized to call special meetings
of the board of directors may fix any place, either within or without the State
of Illinois, as the place for holding any special meeting of the board of
directors called by them.
SECTION 5. NOTICE. Notice
of any special meeting shall be given at least two days previously thereto by
written notice delivered personally, sent by United States mail, sent by a third
party entity that provides delivery services in the ordinary course of business
and guarantees delivery in the particular case no later than the following day,
or sent by electronic transmission. If mailed, such notice shall be
deemed to be delivered 24 hours after deposited in the United States mail,
next-day delivery guaranteed, addressed to the director at the director’s
business address, with postage thereon prepaid. If sent by delivery
service, notice shall be deemed to be delivered 24 hours after delivery to the
third party delivery service. If notice is sent by electronic
transmission, such notice shall be deemed to be delivered upon
transmission. For this purpose, “electronic transmission” may
include, but shall not be limited to, a telex, wire or wireless equipment that
transmits a facsimile of the notice and provides the transmitter with an
electronically generated receipt, or other electronic means. Any
director may waive notice of any meeting. The attendance of a
director at any meeting shall constitute a waiver of notice of such meeting,
except where a director attends a meeting for the express purpose of objecting
to the transaction of any business because the meeting is not lawfully called or
convened. Neither the business to be transacted at, nor the purpose
of, any regular or special meeting of the board of directors need be specified
in the notice or waiver of notice of such meeting.
SECTION 6. QUORUM. A
majority of the board of directors shall constitute a quorum for transaction of
business at any meeting of the board of directors, provided, that if less than a
majority of the directors are present at said meeting, a majority of the
directors present may adjourn the meeting from time to time without further
notice.
SECTION 7. MANNER OF
ACTING. The act of the majority of the directors present at a meeting
at which a quorum is present shall be the act of the board of
directors.
SECTION 8. VACANCIES. Any
vacancy occurring in the board of directors and any directorship to be filled by
reason of an increase in the number of directors may be filled by election at an
annual meeting or at a special meeting of shareholders called for that purpose;
provided, however, vacancies arising between meetings of shareholders by reason
of an increase in the number of directors or otherwise may be filled by a
majority of the board of directors then remaining. A director elected
by the shareholders to fill a vacancy shall hold office for the balance of the
term for which elected. A director appointed by the directors to fill
a vacancy shall serve until the next meeting of shareholders at which directors
are to be elected.
SECTION
9. COMPENSATION. By resolution of the board of directors,
the directors may be paid their expenses, if any, for attendance at each meeting
of the board or of a committee thereof, and may be paid a fixed sum for
attendance at meetings and/or a stated retainer as directors. No such
payment shall preclude any director from serving the corporation in any other
capacity and receiving compensation therefor.
SECTION 10. PRESUMPTION OF
ASSENT. A director of the corporation who is present at a meeting of
the board of directors at which action on any corporate matter is taken shall be
conclusively presumed to have assented to the action taken unless his dissent
shall be entered in the minutes of the meeting or unless he shall file his
written dissent to such action with the person acting as the secretary of the
meeting before the adjournment thereof or shall forward such dissent by
registered mail to the secretary of the corporation immediately after the
adjournment of the meeting. Such right to dissent shall not apply to a director
who voted in favor of such action.
SECTION
11. COMMITTEES. Committees of the board of directors shall
consist of an audit committee, a compensation committee, a board affairs and
nominating committee, and such other committees as the board of directors by
resolution may create. Each committee shall have such number of
members and shall exercise such authority and carry out such duties as are set
forth in resolutions of the board of directors. Committee members
shall be elected annually but shall serve at the discretion of the board of
directors and may be removed by the board of directors. The board of
directors may increase or decrease the number of members of any committee at any
time and may designate one or more directors as alternate members of any
committee, who may replace any absent or disqualified member or members at any
meeting of the committee. A majority of members of a committee shall
constitute a quorum and, unless otherwise set forth in resolutions of the board
of directors, a majority of those members present at a meeting and not
disqualified from voting shall constitute the acts of the
committee.
SECTION 12. INFORMAL ACTION BY
DIRECTORS. (a) Any action required to be taken at a meeting of the
board of directors of the corporation, or any other action which may be taken at
a meeting of the board of directors or a committee thereof, may be taken without
a meeting if a consent in writing, setting forth the action so taken,
shall
be
signed by all of the directors entitled to vote with respect to the subject
matter thereof, or by all of the members of such committee, as the case may
be.
(b) The consent shall be evidenced
by one or more written approvals, each of which sets forth the action taken and
bears the signature of one or more directors. All the approvals
evidencing the consent shall be delivered to the secretary to be filed in the
corporate records. The action taken shall be effective when all the
directors have approved the consent unless the consent specifies a different
effective date.
(c) Any such consent signed by all
the directors or all the members of a committee shall have the same effect as a
unanimous vote, and may be stated as such in any document filed with the
Secretary of State.
SECTION 13. TELEPHONE
ATTENDANCE. (a) Members of the board of directors or of any committee
of the board of directors may participate in and act at any meeting of such
board or committee through the use of a conference telephone or other
communications equipment by means of which all persons participating in the
meeting can hear each other. Participation in such meeting shall
constitute attendance and presence in person at the meeting of the person or
persons so participating.
(b) The board of directors or any
committee may, at its option, provide for a tape recording of any such
conference telephone portion of a meeting but the lack thereof shall not affect
the validity of any actions taken at such meeting.
SECTION 14. REMOVAL OF
DIRECTORS. One or more of the directors may be removed, with or
without cause, at a meeting of shareholders by the affirmative vote of the
holders of a majority of the outstanding shares then entitled to vote at an
election of directors, except that:
(1) No director shall be removed at
a meeting of shareholders unless the notice of such meeting shall state that a
purpose of the meeting is to vote upon the removal of one or more directors
named in the notice. Only the named director or directors may be
removed at such meeting;
(2) If less than the entire board is
to be removed, no director may be removed, with or without cause, if the votes
cast against his removal would be sufficient to elect him, if then cumulatively
voted at an election of the entire board of directors; and
(3) If a director is elected by a
class or series of shares, he may be removed only by the shareholders of that
class or series.
SECTION 15. DIRECTOR CONFLICT OF
INTEREST. If a transaction is fair to the corporation at the time it
is authorized, approved or ratified, the fact that a director of the corporation
is directly or indirectly a party to the transaction shall not be grounds for
invalidating the transaction.
SECTION 16. NOMINATIONS OF
DIRECTORS. Except for directors elected to fill vacancies pursuant to
these by-laws, nominations for election for the board of directors may be made
by the board of directors, by the nominating committee of the board of directors
and approved by the board of directors, or by shareholders in accordance with
the procedures set forth in Article II. Such nominations shall be
submitted to a vote of the shareholders at the next annual meeting of
shareholders or at a special meeting of shareholders called for such
purpose.
ARTICLE
IV
OFFICERS
SECTION 1. NUMBER. The
officers of the corporation shall be a chairman of the board, chief executive
officer, one or more presidents, a chief financial officer, one or more vice
presidents, a treasurer, a secretary, and such other officers and such assistant
or administrative officers as may be elected or appointed as hereinafter
provided. Any two or more offices may be held by the same
person.
SECTION 2. ELECTION, APPOINTMENT AND
TERM OF OFFICE. Officers of the corporation shall be elected or
appointed annually by the board of directors, although vacancies may be filled
or new offices created and filled at any meeting of the board of
directors. Each officer elected or appointed by the board of
directors shall hold office until the next annual election or appointment of
officers by the board of directors, or until his earlier death, resignation or
removal. Officers and assistant or administrative officers of the
corporation may also be appointed from time to time by the chairman of the
board, to serve as such at his pleasure.
SECTION 3. REMOVAL. Any
officer or assistant or administrative officer of the corporation elected or
appointed by the board of directors may be removed by the board of directors
whenever in its judgment the best interests of the corporation would be served
thereby. Any officer or assistant or administrative officer of the
corporation appointed by the chairman of the board may be removed by the
chairman of the board whenever in his judgment the best interests of the
corporation would be served thereby. Any removal provided for in this
Section 3 shall be without prejudice to the contract rights, if any, of the
person so removed. Election or appointment of an officer or assistant
or administrative officer of the corporation shall not itself create contract
rights.
SECTION 4. CHAIRMAN OF THE
BOARD. The chairman of the board shall preside at all meetings of the
shareholders and the board of directors. He shall be primarily
responsible for carrying out the policies established by and the directions of
the board of directors and shall perform such other duties as may be prescribed
from time to time by the board of directors. He may from time to
time, to the extent not delegated by the board of directors, delegate and
re-delegate any part of any of the responsibilities and authority set forth
herein to the senior chairman of the board, if any,
to
the lead director, to any other member of the board of directors, and/or to the
chief executive officer. The chairman of the board must be a director
of the corporation.
The chairman of the board may sign deeds,
mortgages, bonds, contracts or other instruments which the board of directors
has authorized to be executed, except in cases where the signing and execution
thereof shall be expressly delegated by the board of directors or by these
by-laws to some other officer or agent of the corporation, or shall be required
by law to be otherwise signed or executed. The chairman of the board
may delegate signing authority to other persons within the corporation as shall
be deemed necessary.
SECTION 5. CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER. The chief executive officer of the corporation shall oversee
and direct the operations and activities of the corporation and shall perform
such other duties as from time to time may be prescribed by the board of
directors or delegated to him by the chairman of the board.
The chief executive
officer may sign deeds, mortgages, bonds, contracts or other instruments which
the board of directors has authorized to be executed, except in cases where the
signing and execution thereof shall be expressly delegated by the board of
directors or by these by-laws to some other officer or agent of the corporation,
or shall be required by law to be otherwise signed or executed. The
chief executive officer may delegate signing authority to other persons within
the corporation as shall be deemed necessary. The chief executive
officer must be a director of the corporation.
SECTION 6. PRESIDENT. The
president, or if there be more than one the presidents, shall oversee and direct
such operations and activities and shall perform such other duties as from time
to time may be assigned by the board of directors, the chairman of the board or
the chief executive officer. If there be more than one president, the
board of directors may designate one or more of them as group presidents or use
a similar descriptive designation.
SECTION 7. CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER. The chief financial officer shall be the principal financial
officer. He shall have responsibility for administering the financial
affairs of the corporation and, in general perform all duties incident to the
office of the chief financial officer and such other duties as from time to time
may be assigned to him by the board of directors, the chairman of the board or
the chief executive officer.
SECTION 8. VICE
PRESIDENTS. Each of the vice presidents shall be responsible for
those activities and shall perform those duties as from time to time may be
assigned by the board of directors, the chairman of the board, the chief
executive officer or a president. The board of directors may
designate one or more of the vice presidents as executive, group or senior vice
presidents or use a similar descriptive designation.
SECTION 9. SENIOR
CHAIRMAN. The senior chairman of the corporation, if any, shall
consult with the chairman of the board on matters of long- and
short-term
strategic planning
and policy and other significant matters affecting the corporation, and shall
perform such other duties as may from time to time be prescribed by the board of
directors, or delegated to him by the chairman of the board. The
senior chairman need not be a director of the corporation.
SECTION 10. TREASURER. If
required by the board of directors, the treasurer shall give a bond for the
faithful discharge of his duties in such sum and with such surety or sureties as
the board of directors shall determine. He shall (a) have charge
and custody of and be responsible for all funds and securities of the
corporation, (b) receive and give receipts for moneys due and payable to
the corporation from any source whatsoever, and deposit all such moneys in the
name of the corporation in such banks, trust companies or other depositories as
shall be selected in accordance with the provisions of Article V of these
by-laws and (c) in general perform all the duties incident to the office of
treasurer and such other duties as from time to time may be assigned to him by
the board of directors, the chairman of the board, chief executive officer, or
the chief financial officer.
SECTION
11. SECRETARY. The secretary shall (a) keep the
minutes of the shareholders’ and of the board of directors’ meetings in one or
more books provided for that purpose, (b) see that all notices are duly
given in accordance with the provisions of these by-laws or as required by law,
(c) be custodian of the corporate records and of the seal of the
corporation and see that the seal of the corporation is affixed to all
certificates for shares prior to the issue thereof and to all documents, the
execution of which on behalf of the corporation under its seal is duly
authorized in accordance with the provisions of these by-laws, (d) keep, or
cause the transfer agent to keep, a register of the post office address of each
shareholder which shall be furnished to the secretary by such shareholder,
(e) sign with the chairman of the board certificates for shares of the
corporation, the issue of which shall have been authorized by resolution of the
board of directors, (f) have general charge of the stock transfer books of
the corporation and (g) in general perform all duties incident to the
office of secretary and such other duties as from time to time may be assigned
to him by the board of directors, the chairman of the board or the
chief executive officer.
SECTION 12. SALARIES. The
salaries of the officers elected or appointed by the board of directors shall be
fixed from time to time by the board of directors and no such officer shall be
prevented from receiving such salary by reason of the fact that he is also a
director of the corporation.
ARTICLE
V
CONTRACTS, LOANS,
CHECKS AND DEPOSITS
SECTION 1. CONTRACTS. The
board of directors may authorize any officer or officers, agent or agents, to
enter into any contract or execute and deliver any instrument in the name of and
on behalf of the corporation, and such authority may be general or confined to
specific instances.
SECTION 2. LOANS. No
loans shall be contracted on behalf of the corporation and no evidences of
indebtedness shall be issued in its name unless authorized by a resolution of
the board of directors. Such authority may be general or confined to
specific instances.
SECTION 3. CHECKS, DRAFTS,
ETC. All checks, drafts or other orders for the payment of money,
notes, or other evidences of indebtedness issued in the name of the corporation,
shall be signed by such officer or officers, agent or agents of the corporation
and in such manner as shall from time to time be determined by resolution of the
board of directors.
SECTION 4. DEPOSITS. All
funds of the corporation not otherwise employed shall be deposited from time to
time to the credit of the corporation in such banks, trust companies, or other
depositaries as the board of directors may select.
ARTICLE
VI
CERTIFICATES FOR
SHARES
AND THEIR
TRANSFER
SECTION 1. CERTIFICATES FOR
SHARES. The issued shares of the corporation shall be represented by
certificates, except as and to the extent determined by, or pursuant to,
resolution adopted by the board of directors. Certificates
representing shares of the corporation shall be in such form as may be
determined by the board of directors. Such certificates shall be
signed by the chairman of the board and by the secretary or an assistant
secretary, and shall be sealed with the seal of corporation. All
certificates for shares shall be consecutively numbered or otherwise
identified. The name of the person to whom the shares represented
thereby are issued, with the number of shares and date of issue, shall be
entered in the books of the corporation, as shall similar information with
respect to shares that are uncertificated. All certificates
surrendered to the corporation for transfer shall be canceled. No new
certificate shall be issued until the former certificate for a like number of
shares, unless the shares are uncertificated, shall have been surrendered and
canceled except that in the case of a lost, destroyed or mutilated certificate a
new one may be issued therefor upon such terms and indemnity to the corporation
as the board of directors may prescribe.
SECTION 2. TRANSFERS OF
SHARES. Transfers of shares of the corporation shall be made either
on the books of the corporation or on the books of the duly authorized and
appointed agent or agents of the corporation by the holder of record thereof or
by his legal representative, who shall furnish proper evidence of authority to
transfer, or by his attorney thereunto authorized by power of attorney duly
executed and filed with the secretary of the corporation or proper officer of
the transfer agent and, unless such shares are uncertificated, on surrender for
cancellation of the certificate for such shares. The person in whose name shares
stand on the books of the corporation or its duly authorized and appointed
transfer agent or agents shall be deemed the owner thereof for all purposes as
regards the corporation.
ARTICLE
VII
FISCAL
YEAR
The fiscal year of
the corporation shall begin on the first day of January in each year and end on
the last day of December in each year.
ARTICLE
VIII
DIVIDENDS
The board of directors may from time to time,
declare, and the corporation may pay, dividends on its outstanding shares in the
manner and upon the terms and conditions provided by law and its articles of
incorporation.
ARTICLE
IX
SEAL
The board of directors shall provide a
corporate seal which shall be in the form of a circle and shall have inscribed
thereon the name of the corporation and the words, "Corporate Seal,
Illinois".
ARTICLE
X
WAIVER OF
NOTICE
Whenever any notice whatever is required to be
given under the provisions of these by-laws or under the provisions of the
articles of incorporation or under the provisions of the Illinois Business
Corporation Act, a waiver thereof in writing, signed by the person or persons
entitled to such notice, whether before or after the time stated therein shall
be deemed equivalent to the giving of such notice.
ARTICLE
XI
AMENDMENTS
These by-laws may be altered, amended or
repealed and new by-laws may be adopted at any meeting of the board of directors
of the corporation by a majority vote of the directors present at the
meeting.
ARTICLE
XII
INDEMNIFICATION OF
DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS
SECTION 1. The corporation shall
indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party
to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether
civil, criminal, administrative or investigative (other than an action by or in
the right of the corporation) by reason of the fact that he is or was a director
or officer of the corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the
corporation as a director or officer of another corporation, partnership, joint
venture, trust or other enterprise, against expenses (including attorneys'
fees), judgments, fines
and amounts paid in
settlement actually and reasonably incurred by him in connection with such
action, suit or proceeding, if he acted in good faith and in a manner he
reasonably believed to be in, or not opposed to the best interests of the
corporation, and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no
reasonable cause to believe his conduct was unlawful. The termination of any
action, suit or proceeding by judgment, order, settlement, conviction, or upon a
plea of nolo contendere or its equivalent shall not, of itself, create a
presumption that the person did not act in good faith and in a manner which he
reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the
corporation, and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had
reasonable cause to believe that his conduct was unlawful.
SECTION 2. The corporation shall
indemnify any person who was or is a party, or is threatened to be made a party
to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding by or in the
right of the corporation to procure a judgment in its favor by reason of the
fact that he is or was a director or officer of the corporation, or is or was
serving at the request of the corporation as a director or officer of another
corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, against
expenses (including attorneys' fees) actually and reasonably incurred by him in
connection with the defense or settlement of such action, suit or proceeding, if
he acted in good faith and in a manner he reasonably believed to be in, or not
opposed to the best interests of the corporation, and except that no
indemnification shall be made with respect to any claim, issue or matter as to
which such person has been finally adjudged to have been liable to the
corporation, unless, and only to the extent that the court in which such action,
suit or proceeding was brought shall determine upon application that, despite
the adjudication of liability, but in view of all the circumstances of the case,
such person is fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnity for such expenses as
the court shall deem proper.
SECTION 3. (a) Any
indemnification under Sections 1 or 2 (unless ordered by a court) shall be made
only as authorized in the specific case, upon a determination that
indemnification of the director or officer is proper in the circumstances
because he has met the applicable standard of conduct set forth in Sections 1 or
2. Such determination shall be made: (i) if a change in control
shall have occurred, by independent legal counsel in a written opinion to the
board of directors, a copy of which shall be delivered to the claimant; or
(ii) if a change in control shall not have occurred: (A) by a majority
vote of directors who were not parties to such action, suit or proceeding, even
though less than a quorum, (B) by a committee of directors who were not
parties to such action, suit or proceeding, even though less than a quorum,
designated by a majority vote of the directors, (C) if there are no such
directors who were not parties to such action, suit or proceeding, or if such
directors so direct, by independent legal counsel in a written opinion, or
(D) by the shareholders.
(b) In any event, to the extent that
a present or former director or officer of the corporation has been successful,
on the merits or otherwise, in the defense of any action, suit or proceeding
referred to in Sections 1 or 2 or in defense of any claim, issue or matter
therein, he shall be indemnified against reasonable expenses
(including
attorneys' fees)
actually and reasonably incurred by him in connection therewith, if he acted in
good faith and in a manner he reasonably believed to be in, or not opposed to,
the best interests of the corporation.
(c) In the event the determination
of entitlement to indemnification is to be made by independent legal counsel
pursuant to subsection 3(a) hereof, the independent legal counsel shall be
selected as provided in this subsection 3(c). If a change in control
shall not have occurred, the independent legal counsel shall be selected by the
board of directors, and the corporation shall give written notice to the
claimant advising him of the identity of the independent legal counsel so
selected. If a change in control shall have occurred, the independent
legal counsel shall be selected by the claimant (unless the claimant shall
request that such selection be made by the board of directors, in which event
the preceding sentence shall apply) and the claimant shall give written notice
to the corporation advising it of the identity of the independent legal counsel
so selected.
SECTION 4. (a) Reasonable
expenses (including attorney’s fees) incurred by an director or officer in
defending a civil or criminal action, suit or proceeding shall be paid by the
corporation in advance of the final disposition of such action, suit or
proceeding, upon receipt of (i) a statement signed by such director or officer
to the effect that such director or officer acted in good faith and in a manner
which he believed to be in, or not opposed to the best interests of the
corporation and (ii) an undertaking by or on behalf of the director or officer
to repay such amount, if it shall ultimately be determined that he is not
entitled to be indemnified by the corporation as authorized in this
Article XII.
(b) The board of directors may, by
separate resolution adopted under and referring to this Article XII of the
by-laws, provide for securing the payment of authorized advances by the creation
of escrow accounts, the establishment of letters of credit or such other means
as the board deems appropriate and with such restrictions, limitations and
qualifications with respect thereto as the board deems appropriate in the
circumstances.
SECTION 5. (a) The
corporation is specifically authorized to enter into agreements with any of its
directors or officers extending rights to indemnification and advancement of
expenses to such person to the fullest extent permitted by law. The
indemnification and advancement of expenses provided by or granted under this
Article XII shall be separate and distinct from and shall not be deemed
exclusive of any other rights to which those seeking indemnification or
advancement of expenses may be entitled under any statute, by-law, agreement,
including, without limitation, indemnification agreements entered into between
the corporation and any director or officer thereof, vote of shareholders or
disinterested directors, or otherwise, both as to action in his official
capacity and as to action in another capacity while holding such
office. To the extent that there is a conflict or inconsistency
between this Article XII, the corporation’s articles of incorporation and
any indemnification agreement between the corporation and any of its directors
or officers, it is the intent that the director and/or
officer shall enjoy
the greater benefits regardless of whether contained herein, in the articles of
incorporation or in such indemnification agreement.
(b) The provisions of this Article
XII shall be deemed to be a contract between the corporation and each director
and officer who serves in such capacity at anytime while this Article XII
is in effect and all rights under this Article XII including with respect
to indemnification and advancement of expenses shall immediately and fully vest
at the time a person first becomes a director or officer, shall remain vested as
to a person who has ceased to be a director or officer and shall inure to the
benefit of the heirs, executors and administrators of such a person, and such
rights cannot be terminated or diminished in scope by the corporation, the board
of directors or the shareholders of the corporation with respect to a person’s
service prior to the date of such termination. Any repeal or
modification of this Article XII or any repeal or modification of the
Illinois Business Corporation Act or any other applicable law shall not limit
any rights under this Article XII then existing or arising out of events,
acts, omissions or circumstances occurring or existing prior to such repeal or
modification, including, without limitation, the right to indemnification and
advancement of expenses for proceedings commenced after such repeal or
modification to enforce this Article XII with regard to acts, omissions,
events or circumstances occurring or existing prior to such repeal or
modification. If the scope of indemnity provided by this
Article XII or any replacement article, or pursuant to the Illinois
Business Corporation Act or any modification or replacement thereof is
increased, then such person shall be entitled to such increased indemnification
as is in existence at the time indemnity is provided to such person, it being
the intent, subject to Section 10 of this Article XII, to indemnify persons
specified in this Article XII to the fullest extent permitted by
law.
SECTION 6. The corporation may
purchase and maintain insurance on behalf of any person who is or was a
director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or is or was serving at
the request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of
another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise,
against any liability asserted against him and incurred by him in any such
capacity, or arising out of his status as such, whether or not the corporation
would have the power to indemnify him against such liability under the
provisions of this Article.
SECTION 7. Subject to Section 10 of
this Article XII, if a claim under this Article XII is not promptly paid in
full by the corporation after a written claim has been received by the
corporation or if expenses pursuant to Section 4 of this Article XII have
not been promptly advanced after a written request for such advancement
accompanied by the statement and undertaking required by Section 4 of this
Article XII has been received by the corporation, the director or officer
may at any time thereafter bring suit against the corporation to recover the
unpaid amount of the claim or the advancement of expenses. If
successful, in whole or in part, in such suit, such director or officer shall
also be entitled to be paid the reasonable expense thereof, including attorneys'
fees. It shall be a defense to any such action (other than an action
brought to enforce a claim for expenses incurred in defending any proceeding in
advance of its final disposition where the required undertaking has been
tendered to the corporation) that the director
or
officer has not met the standards of conduct which make it permissible under the
Illinois Business Corporation Act for the corporation to indemnify the director
or officer for the amount claimed, but the burden of proving such defense shall
be on the corporation. Neither the failure of the corporation
(including its board of directors, independent legal counsel, or its
shareholders) to have made a determination, if required, prior to the
commencement of such action that indemnification of the director or officer is
proper in the circumstances because he or she has met the applicable standard of
conduct required under the Illinois Business Corporation Act, nor an actual
determination by the corporation (including its board of directors, independent
legal counsel, or its shareholders) that the director or officer had not met
such applicable standard of conduct, shall be a defense to the action or create
a presumption that the director or officer had not met the applicable standard
of conduct.
SECTION 8. For purposes of this
Article XII, references to "the corporation" shall include, in addition to
the surviving corporation, any merging corporation (including any corporation
having merged with a merging corporation) absorbed in a merger which, if its
separate existence had continued, would have had the power and authority to
indemnify its directors, officers and employees or agents, so that any person
who was a director or officer of such merging corporation, or was serving at the
request of such merging corporation as a director or officer of another
corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, shall stand
in the same position under the provisions of this Article XII with respect
to the surviving corporation as such person would have with respect to such
merging corporation if its separate existence had continued.
SECTION 9. For purposes of this
Article XII, references to "other enterprises" shall include employee
benefit plans; references to "fines" shall include any excise taxes assessed on
a person with respect to an employee benefit plan; references to "serving at the
request of the corporation" shall include any service as a director, officer or
employee or agent of the corporation which imposes duties on, or involves
services by such director, officer, employee or agent with respect to an
employee benefit plan, its participants, or beneficiaries; and references to
"officers" shall include elected officers and appointed officers. A
person who acted in good faith and in a manner he reasonably believed to be in
the best interest of the participants and beneficiaries of an employee benefit
plan shall be deemed to have acted in a manner "not opposed to the best interest
of the corporation" as referred to in this Article XII.
SECTION 10. Anything herein to the
contrary notwithstanding, if the corporation purchases insurance in accordance
with Section 6 of this Article XII, the corporation shall not be required
to, but may (if the board of directors so determines in accordance with this
Article XII) reimburse any party instituting any action, suit or proceeding
if a result of the institution thereof is the denial of or limitation of payment
of losses under such insurance when such losses would have been paid thereunder
if a non-insured third party had instituted such action, suit or
proceedings.
ARTICLE
XIII
INDEMNIFICATION OF
EMPLOYEES AND AGENTS
The corporation may indemnify any agent or
employee of the corporation who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a
party to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding
(including, but not limited to any such proceeding by or in the right of the
corporation) whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, by reason
of the fact that he is or was serving the corporation at its request and in the
course and scope of his duties and acting in good faith and in a manner he
reasonably believed to be in, or not opposed to, the best interests of the
corporation, against expenses (including reasonable attorney's fees) actually
and reasonably incurred by him in connection with the defense or settlement of
such action, suit or proceeding. The standards of conduct, the
provisions for payment and advances, and the terms and conditions contained in
Article XII, Sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 5(a), 6, 8, 9 and 10 shall apply to any
indemnification hereunder.