OMB APPROVAL
OMB Number: 3235-0416
Expires: February 28, 2006
Estimated average burden
hours per response 182.00

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-QSB
 
[X]  QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the quarterly period from January 1, 2005 to March 31, 2005
 
[   ]  TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the transition period from ____________  to ____________
 
 
Commission File Number: 000-50535
 
INFINIUM LABS, INC. 
(Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)
 
Delaware
65-1048794
(State or other jurisdiction Identification No.)
(IRS Employer of incorporation or organization)
   
2033 Main Street, Suite 309, Sarasota, Florida
34237
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
(Zip Code)
 
(941) 556-8000
Issuer’s telephone number, including area code

Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. [X] Yes [   ] No

As of May 4, 2005, we currently have outstanding 156,902,567 shares of our common stock and have 339 shareholders of record as confirmed by our transfer agent, Corporate Stock Transfer. 

Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (Check one): Yes [   ] No [X]

SEC 2334 (8-03) Potential persons who are to respond to the collection of information contained in this form are not required to respond unless the form displays a currently valid OMB control number.


 
INDEX


PART I - Financial Information
Page
       
Item 1
Financial Statements
 
3
       
Item 2
Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operations
 
38
       
Item 3
Controls and Procedures
 
56
       
PART II - Other Information
   
       
Item 1
Legal Proceedings
 
57
       
Item 2
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
 
59
       
Item 3
Defaults upon Senior Securities
 
64
       
Item 4
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
 
64
       
Item 5
Other Information
 
64
       
Item 6
Exhibits and Reports on Forms 8-K
 
65
       
Signatures
 
69
       
Certifications
 
70

 

 
PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS







INFINIUM LABS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS OF MARCH 31, 2005
 





 

INFINIUM LABS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)


CONTENTS


     
PAGE
3
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2005 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2004
     
PAGE
4
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2005, for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2004 and for the Period from December 9, 2002 (Inception) through March 31, 2005 (Unaudited)
     
PAGES
5 - 9
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Deficiency for the Period from December 9, 2002 (Inception) through March 31, 2005 (Unaudited)
     
PAGES
10
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2005, for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2004 and for the Period from December 9, 2002 (Inception) through March 31, 2005 (Unaudited)
     
PAGES
11 - 37
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
     
 
 
 

 

INFINIUM LABS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
Consolidated Balance Sheets
 
 
ASSETS
 
   
March 31, 2005 (Unaudited)
   
December 31,
2004
 
Current Assets:
             
Cash
 
$
1,988
 
$
4,102
 
Restricted Cash
   
-
   
894,910
 
Prepaid Expenses
   
22,244
   
-
 
Other Receivable
   
1,465
   
407
 
Total Current Assets
   
25,697
   
899,419
 
               
Property and Equipment, Net
   
432,170
   
475,122
 
               
Other Assets:
             
Deposits
   
5,250
   
5,440
 
Intangible asset, net (Note 2)
   
242,001
   
256,495
 
Total Other Assets
   
247,251
   
261,935
 
               
Total Assets
 
$
705,118
 
$
1,636,476
 
               
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIENCY
               
Current Liabilities:
             
Accounts payable
 
$
3,845,770
 
$
4,583,885
 
Accrued interest expense
   
473,666
   
301,415
 
Other accrued expense
   
117,783
   
105,000
 
Accrued payroll and payroll taxes
   
1,151,834
   
834,682
 
Promissory notes, net (Note 2)
   
7,730,875
   
7,298,348
 
               
Total Current Liabilities
   
13,319,928
   
13,123,330
 
               
Commitments and Contingencies
   
-
   
-
 
     
   
 
Stockholders’ Deficiency:
             
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding
   
-
   
-
 
Common stock, $0.0001 par value, 600,000,000 shares authorized, 143,087,397 and 121,090,655 shares issued and outstanding, respectively (Note 3)
   
14,309
   
12,109
 
Additional paid-in capital (Note 3)
   
37,457,617
   
24,523,917
 
Subscription receivable
   
(22,517
)
 
(22,517
)
Accumulated deficit during development stage
   
(50,064,219
)
 
(36,000,363
)
               
Total Stockholders’ Deficiency
   
(12,614,810
)
 
(11,486,854
)
               
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Deficiency
 
$
705,118
 
$
1,636,476
 


See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
3

INFINIUM LABS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)

 
 
   
For the Three
Months Ended
March 31, 2005
   
For the Three
Months Ended
March 31, 2004
   
For the
Period from
December 9, 2002
(Inception) to
March 31, 2005
 
                     
Operating Expenses:
                   
Development costs
 
$
-
 
$
507,810
 
$
3,536,204
 
Advertising
   
132,969
   
48,776
   
1,721,525
 
Salary expense
   
1,044,252
   
445,110
   
7,821,128
 
Professional fees
   
582,188
   
986,147
   
4,286,791
 
Consultants
   
1,342,499
   
3,143,187
   
11,448,866
 
Impairment of assets
   
-
   
-
   
352,299
 
General and administrative
   
552,146
   
1,023,207
   
4,783,052
 
Total Operating Expenses
   
3,654,054
   
6,154,237
   
33,949,865
 
Net Loss from Operations
   
(3,654,054
)
 
(6,154,237
)
 
(33,949,865
)
                     
Other Income (Expense):
                   
Other income
   
-
   
-
   
1,934
 
Loss on sale of equipment
   
-
   
-
   
(448
)
Loss on conversion of notes
   
(8,476,455
)
 
-
   
(8,476,455
)
Interest expense
   
(1,933,347
)
 
(83,745
)
 
(7,639,385
)
Total Other Income (Expense)
   
(10,409,802
)
 
(83,745
)
 
(16,114,354
)
                     
Loss before Income Taxes
   
(14,063,856
)
 
(6,237,982
)
 
(50,064,219
)
                     
Income Taxes
   
-
   
-
   
-
 
                     
Net Loss
 
$
(14,063,856
)
$
(6,237,982
)
$
(50,064,219
)
                     
Per Common Share
                   
                     
Loss per common share - basic and diluted
 
$
(0.11
)
$
(0.07
)
$
(0.59
)
                     
Weighted average - basic and diluted
   
132,026,521
   
89,826,588
   
84,866,796
 
 

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
4

INFINIUM LABS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Deficiency
For the Period from December 9, 2002 (Inception) to March 31, 2005
(Unaudited)


 
 
Preferred Stock 
Common Stock
 
Additional Paid-In
   
Accumulated Deficit During Development
   
Stock Subscriptions
       
 
   
Shares
   
Amount
   
Shares
   
Amount
   
Capital
   
Stage
   
Receivable
   
Total
 
                                                   
Stock issued to founders ($0.0004 per share)
   
-
 
$
-
   
58,189,728
 
$
5,819
 
$
12,703
 
$
-
 
$
(18,517
)
$
5
 
                                                   
Stock issued for cash ($0.12 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
4,423,012
   
442
   
526,261
   
-
   
-
   
526,703
 
                                                   
Stock issued for services ($0.3775 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
2,957,376
   
296
   
1,112,709
   
-
   
-
   
1,113,005
 
                                                   
Net loss for the period from December 9, 2002 (inception) to October 31, 2003
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
(2,270,129
)
 
-
   
(2,270,129
)
                                                   
Balance, October 31, 2003
   
-
   
-
   
65,570,116
   
6,557
   
1,651,673
   
(2,270,129
)
 
(18,517
)
 
(630,416
)
                                                   
Stock issued for cash ($0.28 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
2,169,148
   
217
   
612,172
   
-
   
(145,000
)
 
467,389
 
                                                   
Stock issued for signage rights ($0.3175 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
942,600
   
94
   
299,906
   
-
   
-
   
300,000
 
                                                   
Stock issued for services ($0.3175 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
434,036
   
43
   
138,597
   
-
   
-
   
138,640
 
                                                   
Net loss for the two months ended December 31, 2003
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
(598,948
)
 
-
   
(598,948
)
                                                   
Balance, December 31, 2003
   
-
   
-
   
69,115,900
   
6,911
   
2,702,348
   
(2,869,077
)
 
(163,517
)
 
(323,335
)
                                                   
Recapitalization of Global Business Resources
   
-
   
-
   
16,156,000
   
1,615
   
(1,615
)
 
-
   
-
   
-
 
                                                   
Shares issued for cash ($0.25 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
6,650,000
   
665
   
1,661,835
   
-
   
-
   
1,662,500
 
                                                   
Shares issued for cash ($0.257 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
141,000
   
141,000
 
                                                   
Shares issued with note payable ($0.78 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
560,000
   
56
   
433,944
   
-
   
-
   
434,000
 
                                                   
Shares issued for legal settlement ($1.475 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
66,668
   
7
   
98,328
   
-
   
-
   
98,335
 
                                                   
Shares issued for services ($1.475 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
1,750,000
   
175
   
2,581,075
   
-
   
-
   
2,581,250
 
                                                   
Shares issued with note payable ($1.47 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
7,500
   
-
   
11,025
   
-
   
-
   
11,025
 


See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
5

INFINIUM LABS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Deficiency
For the Period from December 9, 2002 (Inception) to March 31, 2005
(Unaudited)


 
 
Preferred Stock 
Common Stock
 
Additional Paid-In
   
Accumulated Deficit During Development
   
Stock Subscriptions
       
 
   
Shares 
   
Amount
   
Shares
   
Amount
   
Capital
   
Stage
   
Receivable
   
Total
 
                                                   
Shares issued with note payable ($1.42 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
200,000
   
20
   
283,980
   
-
   
-
   
284,000
 
                                                   
Shares issued with note payable ($1.475 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
100,000
   
10
   
147,490
   
-
   
-
   
147,500
 
                                                   
Shares issued with note payable ($1.13 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
60,000
   
6
   
67,794
   
-
   
-
   
67,800
 
                                                   
Shares issued with note payable ($1.43 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
33,000
   
3
   
47,187
   
-
   
-
   
47,190
 
                                                   
Shares issued with note payable ($1.475 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
511,000
   
51
   
753,674
   
-
   
-
   
753,725
 
 
                                                 
Shares issued for loan default penalty ($1.475 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
74,999
   
8
   
110,616
   
-
   
-
   
110,624
 
                                                   
Shares issued for loan default penalty ($1.13 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
75,000
   
8
   
84,742
   
-
   
-
   
84,750
 
                                                   
Shares issued for loan default penalty ($1.475 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
80,000
   
8
   
117,992
   
-
   
-
   
118,000
 
                                                   
Shares issued for loan default penalty ($1.56 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
603,038
   
61
   
942,487
   
-
   
-
   
942,548
 
                                                   
Shares issued for loan default penalty ($1.47 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
955,312
   
96
   
1,404,213
   
-
   
-
   
1,404,309
 
                                                   
Shares issued for cash ($2.50 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
40,000
   
4
   
99,996
   
-
   
-
   
100,000
 
                                                   
Shares issued for legal settlement ($1.455 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
53,332
   
5
   
77,560
   
-
   
-
   
77,565
 
                                                   
Shares issued for cash ($2.00 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
100,000
   
10
   
199,990
   
-
   
-
   
200,000
 


See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
6

INFINIUM LABS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Deficiency
For the Period from December 9, 2002 (Inception) to March 31, 2005
(Unaudited)


 
 
Preferred Stock 
Common Stock
 
Additional Paid-In
   
Accumulated Deficit During Development
   
Stock Subscriptions
       
 
   
Shares 
   
Amount
   
Shares
   
Amount
   
Capital
   
Stage
   
Receivable
   
Total
 
                                                   
Shares issued to consultants for services ($1.44 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
830,000
   
83
   
1,195,117
   
-
   
-
   
1,195,200
 
                                                   
Shares issued to consultants for services ($1.475 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
100,000
   
10
   
147,490
   
-
   
-
   
147,500
 
                                                   
Shares issued to consultants for services ($1.60 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
279,260
   
28
   
446,788
   
-
   
-
   
446,816
 
                                                   
Shares issued to consultants for services ($0.92 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
440,000
   
44
   
404,756
   
-
   
-
   
404,800
 
                                                   
Beneficial conversion of promissory notes at $0.75 per share
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
71,275
   
-
   
-
   
71,275
 
                                                   
Shares issued for loan guaranty ($1.04 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
800,000
   
80
   
831,920
   
-
   
-
   
832,000
 
                                                   
Shares issued to consultants ($1.13 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
1,000,000
   
100
   
1,129,900
   
-
   
-
   
1,130,000
 
                                                   
Shares issued to consultants for services ($0.64 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
21,460
   
2
   
13,732
   
-
   
-
   
13,734
 
                                                   
Shares issued to consultants for services ($0.61 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
200,000
   
20
   
121,980
   
-
   
-
   
122,000
 
                                                   
Shares issued to consultants for services ($0.60 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
36,000
   
4
   
21,416
   
-
   
-
   
21,420
 
                                                   
Shares issued to consultants for services ($0.60 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
1,933,224
   
193
   
1,162,251
   
-
   
-
   
1,162,444
 
                                                   
Shares issued to employees ($0.33 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
300,000
   
30
   
98,970
   
-
   
-
   
99,000
 
                                                   
Shares issued for cash ($0.25 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
1,900,400
   
190
   
474,910
   
-
   
-
   
475,100
 


See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
7

INFINIUM LABS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Deficiency
For the Period from December 9, 2002 (Inception) to March 31, 2005
(Unaudited)


 
 
Preferred Stock 
Common Stock
 
Additional Paid-In
   
Accumulated Deficit During Development
   
Stock Subscriptions
       
 
   
Shares 
   
Amount
   
Shares
   
Amount
   
Capital
   
Stage
   
Receivable
   
Total
 
                                                   
Shares issued to employees ($0.32 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
1,790,000
   
179
   
565,321
   
-
   
-
   
565,500
 
                                                   
Shares issued to employees ($0.22 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
5,199,967
   
520
   
1,136,579
   
-
   
-
   
1,137,099
 
                                                   
Shares issued to executives ($0.22 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
1,100,000
   
110
   
240,432
   
-
   
-
   
240,542
 
                                                   
Shares issued to consultants for services ($0.21 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
3,885,410
   
388
   
811,753
   
-
   
-
   
812,141
 
                                                   
Shares issued with notes payable ($0.42 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
1,750,000
   
175
   
734,825
   
-
   
-
   
735,000
 
                                                   
Shares issued to consultants for services ($0.28 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
1,350,000
   
135
   
377,365
   
-
   
-
   
377,500
 
                                                   
Shares issued for interest ($0.18 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
375,000
   
38
   
67,462
   
-
   
-
   
67,500
 
                                                   
Shares issued for services ($0.25 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
150,000
   
15
   
37,485
   
-
   
-
   
37,500
 
                                                   
Shares issued for cash ($0.16 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
1,649,635
   
165
   
263,910
   
-
   
-
   
264,075
 
                                                   
Beneficial conversion of promissory notes at $0.10 per share
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
318,500
   
-
   
-
   
318,500
 
                                                   
Fair value of warrants issued in conjunction with promissory notes ranging from $0.10 per share to $1.00 per share
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
2,025,000
   
-
   
-
   
2,025,000
 
                                                   
Shares contributed in kind
   
-
   
-
   
(1,191,450
)
 
(119
)
 
119
   
-
   
-
   
-
 
                                                   
Net loss, December 31, 2004
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
(33,131,286
)
 
-
   
(33,131,286
)
                                                   
Balance, December 31, 2004
   
-
   
-
   
121,090,655
   
12,109
   
24,523,917
   
(36,000,363
)
 
(22,517
)
 
(11,486,854
)
                                                   
 
 
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
8

INFINIUM LABS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Deficiency
For the Period from December 9, 2002 (Inception) to March 31, 2005
(Unaudited)
 
 
 
 
Preferred Stock 
Common Stock
 
Additional Paid-In
   
Accumulated Deficit During Development
   
Stock Subscriptions
       
 
   
Shares 
   
Amount
   
Shares
   
Amount
   
Capital
   
Stage
   
Receivable
   
Total
 
Shares issued to Director for services ($1.59 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
40,000
   
4
   
63,596
   
-
   
-
   
63,600
 
                                                   
Shares issued to consultants for services ($0.87 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
125,179
   
13
   
108,916
   
-
   
-
   
108,929
 
                                                   
Shares issued to convert note payable ($1.18 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
7,043,750
   
704
   
8,310,921
   
-
   
-
   
8,311,625
 
                                                   
Shares issued to consultants for services ($0.54 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
1,200,000
   
120
   
647,880
   
-
   
-
   
648,000
 
                                                   
Shares issued to convert note payable ($0.365 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
4,925,291
   
493
   
1,797,238
   
-
   
-
   
1,797,731
 
                                                   
Shares issued to consultants for services ($0.32 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
1,722,453
   
172
   
558,675
   
-
   
-
   
558,847
 
                                                   
Shares issued to employees ($0.25 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
225,000
   
22
   
56,228
   
-
   
-
   
56,250
 
                                                   
Shares issued to convert note payable ($0.122 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
5,815,069
   
582
   
711,336
   
-
   
-
   
711,918
 
                                                   
Shares issued to consultant for services ($0.32 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
100,000
   
10
   
31,990
   
-
   
-
   
32,000
 
                                                   
Shares issued to Director for services ($0.34 per share)
   
-
   
-
   
800,000
   
80
   
271,920
   
-
   
-
   
272,000
 
                                                   
Beneficial conversion of promissory notes
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
375,000
   
-
   
-
   
375,000
 
                                                   
Net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2005
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
(14,063,856
)
 
-
   
(14,063,856
)
                                                   
BALANCE, MARCH 31, 2005
   
-
 
$
-
   
143,087,397
 
$
14,309
 
$
37,457,617
 
$
(50,064,219
)
$
(22,517
)
$
(12,614,810
)


See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
9

INFINIUM LABS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)


 
   
For the Three
 Months Ended March 31, 2005
   
For the Three
Months Ended
March 31, 2004
   
For the Period from
December 9, 2002
(Inception) to
March 31, 2005
 
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
                   
   Net loss
 
$
(14,063,856
)
$
(6,237,982
)
$
(50,064,219
)
   Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
                   
Depreciation and amortization
   
57,445
   
12,766
   
231,793
 
Impairment of assets
   
-
   
-
   
352,299
 
Loss on disposal of assets
   
-
   
-
   
448
 
Common stock issued for services
   
1,683,376
   
2,679,585
   
11,387,366
 
Common Stock issued to employees
   
56,250
   
-
   
2,098,391
 
Common stock issued for legal settlements
   
-
   
-
   
175,900
 
Common stock issued for interest
   
319,818
   
-
   
3,047,549
 
Common stock issued for loan guarantee
   
-
   
-
   
832,000
 
Loss on conversion of notes payable
   
8,476,455
   
-
   
8,476,455
 
Amortization of interest expense
   
1,422,527
   
56,750
   
3,598,115
 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
                   
    Decrease (increase) in current assets:
                   
Other receivables
   
(1,057
)
 
130,350
   
(1,464
)
Deposits
   
190
   
(71,534
)
 
(5,250
)
Prepaid expense
   
(22,244
)
 
(921,523
)
 
(22,244
)
    Increase (decrease) in current liabilities:
                   
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
   
(235,928
)
 
1,148,769
   
5,589,054
 
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities
   
(2,307,024
)
 
(3,202,819
)
 
(14,303,807
)
                     
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
                   
Purchase of property and equipment
   
-
   
(172,843
)
 
(970,467
)
Sale of property and equipment
   
-
   
-
   
11,755
 
(Increase) decrease in restricted cash
   
894,910
   
-
   
-
 
Net Cash Provided (Used) in Investing Activities
   
894,910
   
(172,843
)
 
(958,712
)
                     
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
                   
Repayments of notes payable
   
-
   
(375,000
)
 
(1,075,000
)
Proceeds from stockholder
   
-
   
-
   
4,940
 
Payments to stockholder
   
-
   
(4,940
)
 
(4,940
)
Proceeds from sale of common stock, net
   
375,000
   
2,016,500
   
9,106,747
 
Promissory note
   
1,035,000
   
2,046,000
   
7,232,760
 
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities
   
1,410,000
   
3,682,560
   
15,264,507
 
                     
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH
   
(2,114
)
 
306,898
   
1,988
 
                     
CASH AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD
   
4,102
   
45,852
   
-
 
                     
CASH AT END OF PERIOD
 
$
1,988
 
$
352,750
 
$
1,988
 
                     
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:
                   
                     
Cash paid for interest
 
$
18,750
 
$
26,995
 
$
533,838
 
 
Supplemental Disclosure of Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities:
During 2003, the Company issued 235,600 shares of common stock with a fair value of $300,000 for intangible signage rights.
During the first quarter of 2005, the Company issued 15,837,210 shares of common stock to convert three notes payable aggregating $2,025,000.

10

INFINIUM LABS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
 
NOTE 1 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ORGANIZATION

(A) Organization
 
Infinium Labs, Inc. (“Infinium”) a Delaware corporation, formed on December 9, 2002, and located in Sarasota, Florida, is a development stage company, and as such has devoted most of its efforts since inception to developing its business plan, issuing common stock, raising capital and developing its products.
 
Infinium Labs, Inc. is developing an innovative broadband video game delivery system designed to allow consumers to purchase and play games directly over the internet. Infinium Labs Inc.’s service also will have the capacity to allow multiplayer tournaments and contests, both against other subscribers and against PC gamers. The subscriber can access all of this without ever having to go to a store to purchase games.

On January 5, 2004, Global Business Resources, Inc., a State of Delaware Corporation, consummated an agreement with Infinium Labs, Inc. a Delaware corporation, pursuant to which Infinium Labs, Inc. exchanged all of its then issued and outstanding shares of common stock for 58,189,728 shares or approximately 81% of the common stock of Global Business Resources, Inc. As a result of the agreement, the transaction was treated for accounting purposes as a capital transaction and recapitalization by the accounting acquirer (Infinium Labs, Inc.) and as reorganization by the accounting acquiree (Global Business Resources, Inc.). Subsequent to the merger, Global Business Resources, Inc. changed its name to Infinium Labs, Inc. and Infinium Labs, Inc. changed its fiscal year end to December 31 from October 31.

Accordingly, the financial statements include the following:
 
(1) The balance sheet consists of the net assets of the acquirer at historical cost and the net assets of the acquiree at historical cost.
 
(2) The statement of operations includes the operations of the acquirer for the periods presented and the operations of the acquiree from the date of the merger.
 
(B) Basis of Presentation
 
The accompanying unaudited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission for interim financial information. Accordingly, they do not include all the information necessary for a comprehensive presentation of financial position and results of operations.
 
It is management’s opinion however, that all material adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) have been made which are necessary for a fair financial statements presentation. The results for the interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the year.

(C) Use of Estimates

In preparing financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and revenues and expenses during the reported period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

(D) Consolidation

The accompanying March 31, 2005 and 2004 consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Infinium Labs, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary, Infinium Labs Operating Corporation. Intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

11

INFINIUM LABS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
 
(E) Research and Development Costs

The Company’s software products reach technological feasibility shortly before the products are released for manufacturing. Costs incurred after technological feasibility is established are not material, and accordingly, the Company expenses all research and development costs when incurred.

(F) Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Depreciation is provided using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of three to seven years. Various note holders have a security interest in the Company’s assets.

(G) Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes under the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” (“Statement 109”). Under Statement 109, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Under Statement 109, the effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

(H) Loss Per Share

Basic and diluted net loss per common share is computed based upon the weighted average common shares outstanding as defined by statement of Financial Accounting Standards “SFAS” No. 128, “Earnings per Share.” For the three months ended March 31, 2005, the three months ended March 31, 2004, and the period from December 9, 2002 (Inception) through March 31, 2005, the effect of common share equivalents was anti-dilutive and not included in the calculation of diluted net loss per common share.

(I) Advertising

Advertising costs are expensed either in the periods in which those costs are incurred or the first time the advertising takes place. For the three months ended March 31, 2005, the three months ended March 31, 2004 and the period from December 9, 2002 (Inception) to March 31, 2005 the company incurred advertising costs of $132,969, $48,776 and $1,721,525, respectively.
 
12

INFINIUM LABS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
 
(J) Business Segments

The Company operates in one segment and therefore segment information is not presented.

(K) Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 151, “Inventory Costs - an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4”” SFAS No. 152, “Accounting for Real Estate Time-Sharing Transactions - an amendment of FASB Statements No. 66 and 67,” SFAS No. 153, “Exchanges of Non-monetary Assets - an amendment of APB Opinion No. 29,” and SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment,” were recently issued. SFAS No. 151, 152, 153 and 123 (revised 2004) have no current applicability to the Company and have no effect on the financial statements.

(L) Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid temporary cash investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. As of December 31, 2004, the Company had $894,910 held in an attorney trust account related to the notes payable issued in December 2004. The release of the funds to the Company was contingent upon the Form SB-2 being filed with the SEC. The form SB-2 was filed with the SEC on January 5, 2005 and, subsequently, the $894,910 was transferred from the attorney trust account into Infinium Labs, Inc.’s bank account on January 6, 2005.

(M) Concentration of Credit Risk

The Company at times has cash in banks in excess of FDIC insurance limits and places its temporary cash investments with high credit quality financial institutions. At March 31, 2005, the Company had no cash in excess of FDIC insurance limits.

(N) Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for cash, receivables, accrued expenses and notes payable approximate fair value based on the short-term maturity of these instruments.

(O) Stock Based Compensation

The Company accounts for employee stock options in accordance with APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting For Stock Issued To Employees” and has adopted the disclosure-only option under SFAS No. 123. The Company accounts for non-employee stock transactions in accordance with SFAS No. 123 as amended by SFAS 148 “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure” requires that companies, which do not elect to account for stock-based compensation as prescribed by this statement, disclose the pro-forma effects on earnings per share as id SFAS 123 has been adopted.
 
13

INFINIUM LABS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
 
(P) Long-Lived Assets, Goodwill and Intangible Assets

In accordance with SFAS 142 and 144, long-lived assets, goodwill and certain identifiable intangible assets held and used by the Company are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. For purposes of evaluating the recoverability of long-lived assets, goodwill and intangible assets, the recoverability test is performed using undiscounted net cash flows related to the long-lived assets.

NOTE 2 NOTES PAYABLE

During 2003, the Company received $275,000, net of offering costs of $25,000 in the form of a 20% secured convertible debenture that matures on February 28, 2004 and is guaranteed by the Company's Chairman and Chief Executive officer. The maximum borrowings available under the debenture agreement are $750,000. The debenture is secured by all of the Company's assets and is convertible in its entirety at the option of the holder into the Company's common stock at a conversion price of $1.00. There was no beneficial conversion recognized on the issuance of the convertible notes payable as the conversion price was equal to recent cash offering price. During February 2004, the entire convertible note was repaid with cash of $275,000. At March 31, 2005, the outstanding balance on the convertible debenture was $0.

During 2003, the Company entered into a $100,000 convertible note payable in full settlement of a lawsuit. The note is non-interest bearing and was due August 11, 2004. The note is convertible at the option of the note holder at any time at the current trading price of the Company's common stock. During February 2004, the entire convertible note was repaid with cash of $100,000. At March 31, 2005, the balance on the note payable was $0.

In February 2004, the Company authorized a private debt offering of secured 12% and 15% promissory notes with due dates one year from the date of issuance, within sixty days of the Company's SB-2 becoming effective or upon the Company receiving an equity investment of at least $15,000,000. For each loan to the Company, the lender was also entitled to 20,000 shares of the Company's common stock. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2004, the Company issued an aggregate of $2,400,000 promissory notes and issued 560,000 common shares. The shares were treated as a discount to the private offering, the shares were valued at $434,000 based on the market price on the dates the funds were received and the discount is being amortized over the life of the notes. These notes secured with the assets of the Company are currently in default.

On February 27, 2004, the Company borrowed $500,000 under a 12% secured subordinated debenture for a maximum term of 12 months. As additional consideration, the Company issued to the holder 200,000 shares of common stock having a fair value of $284,000. The shares were treated as a discount to the debenture and the discount is being amortized over the life of the debenture. This debenture is secured with the assets of the Company and is currently in default.

14

INFINIUM LABS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
 
On April 7, 2004, the Company borrowed $500,000 under a 15% promissory note which was initially payable on December 15, 2004 and subsequently became payable on March 31, 2005 per a conversion option agreement dated November 10, 2004 that entitles the note holder to convert the amount of the note into shares of stock at a per share price of $0.10; in addition, the note holder is entitled to a Stock Purchase Warrant for 200% of the number of shares obtained in the conversion at a warrant exercise price of $0.10. The note is secured with the assets of the Company. On March 22, 2005, the note was paid in full via a Conversion Agreement which converted the entire amount of the note into common stock at a per share price of $0.10 and the Company issued 11,630,138 warrants exercisable at $0.10 per share. The Company recognized a loss on the conversion of $130,411.

On May 7, 2004, the Company borrowed $100,000 under a 15% promissory note. As additional consideration, the Company issued the holder 40,000 shares of common stock having a fair value of $55,200. The shares were treated as a discount to the note and the discount is being amortized over the life of the note. The note was fully paid off as of March 31, 2005.

On May 7, 2004, the Company borrowed $250,000 under a 15% promissory note which was initially payable on September 15, 2004 and was extended to April 30, 2005 per a conversion option agreement dated November 10, 2004 that entitles the note holder to convert the amount of the note into shares of stock at a per share price of $0.10. In addition, the note holder is entitled to a Stock Purchase Warrant for 200% of the number of shares obtained in the conversion at a warrant exercise price of $0.10. As additional consideration, the Company issued to the holder 100,000 shares of common stock having a fair value of $147,500. The shares were treated as a discount to the note and the discount is being amortized over the life of the note. The note is secured with the assets of the Company. The principal and accrued interest due on this note as of March 31, 2005 was $288,116 and the entire amount of the note was converted into common stock during May 2005 (see Note 9).

On May 19, 2004, the Company borrowed $417,260 under a 15% secured promissory note which was initially payable on June 3, 2004 but has been amended to January 15, 2005 for an additional consideration of $30,000. The additional consideration was amortized over the life of the amendment. This note is currently in default.

On May 28, 2004, the Company borrowed $350,000 under a 15% secured promissory note, which was payable August 1, 2004. As additional consideration, the Company issued the holder 33,000 shares of common stock having a fair value of $47,190. The shares were treated as a discount to the note and the discount is being amortized over the life of the note. The note is secured with the assets of the Company. This note was settled on January 6, 2005 via a Conversion Agreement which converted the entire amount of the note into common stock at a per share price of $0.10. The Company recognized a loss on the conversion of $3,803,625.

On May 28, 2004, the Company borrowed $350,000 under a 15% promissory note which was initially payable on June 8, 2004 but has been amended to January 1, 2005 for additional consideration of $30,000. The additional consideration was amortized over the life of the amendment. As additional consideration, the Company issued the holder 7,500 shares of common stock having a fair value of $11,025. The shares were treated as a discount to the note and the discount is being amortized over the life of the note. This note is currently in default.

15

INFINIUM LABS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
 
On June 4, 2004, the Company borrowed $825,000 under a 15% secured convertible promissory note, which was initially due no later than June 3, 2005 but the note was amended and is now payable no later than January 15, 2005. As additional consideration, the Company issued the holder 511,000 shares of common stock having a fair value of $753,725. The shares were treated as a discount to the note and the discount is being amortized over the life of the note. The Company recognized beneficial conversion on the promissory note of $71,275. The beneficial conversion was treated as a discount to the note and the discount is being amortized over the life of the note. The note is secured with the assets of the Company. On February 11, 2005, the note was paid in full via a Conversion Agreement which converted the entire amount of the note into common stock at a per share price of $0.215. The Company recognized a loss on the conversion of $738,794.

On June 21, 2004, the Company borrowed $1,500,000 under a 15% promissory note, which was payable no later than June 22, 2005. As additional consideration, the Company issued the holder 60,000 shares of common stock having a fair value of $67,800. The shares were treated as a discount to the note and the discount is being amortized over the life of the note. As consideration for the Chief Executive Officer’s personal guaranty of note, the Company compensated the Chief Executive Officer $50,000. The principal and accrued interest due on this note as of March 31, 2005 was $1,565,000 and the entire amount of the note was converted into common stock on April 11, 2005 (see Note 9).

On July 28, 2004, the Company borrowed $500,000 under a 15% promissory note which is payable on July 28, 2005. As consideration for a Director's personal guaranty of note, the Company issued the Director 800,000 shares of common stock having a fair value of $832,000. The principal and accrued interest due on this note as of March 31, 2005 was $549,846.

On September 13, 2004, the Company borrowed $350,000 under a 15% secured promissory note, which is payable September 13, 2005. The note is secured with the assets of the Company. On January 6, 2005, the note was paid in full via a Conversion Agreement which converted the entire amount of the note into common stock at a per share price of $0.10. The Company recognized a loss on the conversion of $3,803,625.

On October 20, 2004, the Company entered into a Bridge Loan Agreement with Hazinu Ltd. pursuant to which the Lender advanced the principal amount of $300,000 to the Company on October 21, 2004 in exchange for (i) a 10% secured promissory note in such principal amount, (ii) 500,000 shares of our common stock, and (iii) warrants to purchase 500,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.50 per share. The value of the shares and warrants of $152,500 and $147,500, respectively were treated as a discount to the note and the discount is being amortized over the life of the note. The note was due December 31, 2004 and during December 2004, the entire note was repaid with cash. At March 31, 2005, the outstanding balance on the convertible debenture was $0.

16

INFINIUM LABS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
 
On October 27, 2004, the Company entered into a Bridge Loan Agreement with JM Investors, LLC, Fenmore Holdings, LLC, Viscount Investments Limited and Congregation Mishkan Sholom pursuant to which the Lenders advanced an aggregate principal amount of $300,000 to the Company on October 28, 2004 in exchange for (i) 10% secured promissory notes in such aggregate principal amount, (ii) 500,000 shares of our common stock and (iii) warrants to purchase an aggregate of 500,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.50 per share. The value of the shares and warrants of $152,500 and $147,500, respectively were treated as a discount to the note and the discount is being amortized over the life of the note. The note was due December 31, 2004 and during December 2004, the entire note was repaid with cash. At March 31, 2005, the outstanding balance on the convertible debenture was $0.

On December 13, 2004, the Company entered into a Bridge Loan Agreement with 15 various entities pursuant to which the Lenders advanced an aggregate principal amount of $1,160,000 to the Company on December 16, 2004 in exchange for (i) 8% secured promissory notes in such aggregate principal amount, (ii) 250,000 shares of our common stock and (iii) warrants to purchase an aggregate of 16,312,461 shares of our common stock at exercise prices ranging from $0.10 to $1.00 per share. The value of the shares and warrants of $60,000 and $1,100,000, respectively were treated as a discount to the note and the discount is being amortized over the life of the note. The note is due December 16, 2005.

On December 28, 2004, the Company entered into a Bridge Loan Agreement with 14 various entities pursuant to which the Lenders advanced an aggregate principal amount of $1,000,000 to the Company on January 6, 2005 in exchange for (i) 8% secured promissory notes in such aggregate principal amount, (ii) 500,000 shares of our common stock and (iii) warrants to purchase an aggregate of 4,4687,485 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.10 per share. The value of the shares and warrants of $370,000 and $630,000, respectively were treated as a discount to the note and the discount is being amortized over the life of the note. The note is due December 28, 2005.

On January 27, 2005, the Company borrowed $300,000 from Timothy Roberts, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, under a 15% promissory note, which is payable no later than April 27, 2005. This note is currently in default.

On January 28, 2005, the Company borrowed $135,000 under a 17% promissory note, which is payable no later than March 29, 2005. This note is currently in default.

On January 31, 2005, the Company borrowed $175,000 under a 15% convertible promissory note, which is payable no later than May 10, 2005. The note is convertible into 1,000,000 million shares of common stock and the Company recognized beneficial conversion on the promissory note of $175,000. The beneficial conversion was treated as a discount to the note and the discount is being amortized over the life of the note. This note is currently in default.

On January 31, 2005, the Company borrowed $100,000 under a 15% convertible promissory note, which is payable no later than May 10, 2005. The note is convertible into 1,000,000 million shares of common stock and the Company recognized beneficial conversion on the promissory note of $100,000. The beneficial conversion was treated as a discount to the note and the discount is being amortized over the life of the note. This note is currently in default.

17

INFINIUM LABS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
 
On February 3, 2005, the Company borrowed $100,000 under a 15% convertible promissory note, which is payable no later than May 10, 2005. The note is convertible into 1,000,000 million shares of common stock and the Company recognized beneficial conversion on the promissory note of $100,000. The beneficial conversion was treated as a discount to the note and the discount is being amortized over the life of the note. This note is currently in default.

On March 9, 2005, the Company borrowed $400,000 under a 10% promissory note, which is payable no later than May 9, 2005. This note is currently in default.

On March 21, 2005, the Company borrowed $200,000 under a 17% promissory note, which is payable no later than May 20, 2005.

Notes payable - face value
 
$
9,487,260
 
Notes payable - discount
   
1,756,385
 
         
   
$
7,730,875
 

The discount from the face value of the promissory notes is being amortized over the life of the promissory notes as additional interest expense. During the three month period ended March 31, 2005, the three month period ended March 31, 2004 and the period from December 9, 2002 (Inception) to March 31, 2005, the Company has recorded interest expense from the discounts of $1,422,527, $56,750 and $3,598,115, respectively.
 
All of these transactions were exempt from the registration requirements of Section 4(2) of the Securities Act as transactions not involving a public offering.

NOTE 3 STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIENCY

(A) Stock Issued for Cash

During 2002, the Company issued 58,189,728 shares of common stock to its founder for $18,522 ($0.0004 per share).

During 2003, the Company issued 4,423,012 shares of common stock for cash of $526,703 ($0.12 per share).

During 2003, the Company issued 1,748,380 shares of common stock for $545,717 ($0.28 per share), net of offering costs of $11,239.

During 2003, the Company issued 420,768 shares of common stock for $66,672 ($0.16 per share).

During 2004, the Company issued 6,650,000 shares of common stock for $1,662,500 ($0.25 per share).
 
18

INFINIUM LABS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
 
During 2004, the Company issued 40,000 shares of common stock for cash of $100,000 ($2.50 per share).

During 2004, the Company issued 1,900,400 shares of common stock for $475,100 ($0.25 per share). In connection with this transaction, the Company issued 2,022,900 warrants to purchase common stock exercisable at a price of $0.25. The warrants are fully exercisable at any time for a period of five years after the closing date of the sale. None of the warrants were executed, forfeited or expired in 2005. Therefore, all 2,022,900 warrants were outstanding and exercisable as of March 31, 2005.

On August 26, 2004, the Company issued 100,000 shares of common stock for $200,000 ($2.00 per share).

During 2004, the Company issued 1,649,635 shares of common stock for $264,075 ($0.16 per share).

(B) Stock Issued for Services

During 2002, the Company issued 2,957,376 shares of common stock for software development services valued for financial accounting purposes at $1,113,005 ($0.3775 per share) based upon recent cash offering prices.

During 2003, the Company issued 434,036 shares of common stock for software development services valued for financial accounting purposes at $138,640 ($0.3175 per share) based upon recent cash offering prices.

During 2003, the Company issued 942,600 shares of common stock for signature rights valued for financial accounting purposes at $300,000 ($0.3175 per share) based upon recent cash offering prices.

During 2004, the Company issued 1,750,000 shares of common stock for software development and consulting services with a fair value of $2,581,250 ($1.475 per share).

During 2004, the Company issued 279,260 shares of common stock for services with a fair value of $446,816 ($1.60 per share).

During 2004, the Company issued 830,000 shares of restricted common stock for services to three consultants having a fair value of $1,195,200 ($1.44 per share).

During 2004, the Company issued 440,000 shares of restricted common stock for services with a fair value of $404,800 ($.92 per share).

During 2004, the Company issued 100,000 shares of our restricted common stock for services with a fair value of $147,500 ($1.475 per share).

19

INFINIUM LABS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
 
During 2004, the Company issued 1,933,224 shares to consultants for services with a fair value of $1,162,444 ($0.60 per share).

On July 28, 2004, as consideration for the Director's personal guaranty of a note payable (see Note 4), the Company issued the Director 800,000 shares of common stock having a fair value of $832,000 ($1.04 per share). These shares issued to the Director were restricted shares of common stock and, therefore, were not tradable at the time of issuance. These shares of common stock issued to the Director may become unrestricted on July 28, 2005.

During August 2004, the Company issued 1,000,000 shares to consultants for real estate service with a fair value of $1,130,000 ($1.13 per share).

During August 2004, the Company issued 21,460 shares to a consultant for services with a fair value of $13,734 ($0.64 per share).

During August, 2004, the Company issued 200,000 shares to a consultant for financial services with a fair value of $122,000 ($0.61 per share).

During August 2004, the Company issued 36,000 shares to a consultant for engineering services with a fair value of $21,420 ($0.60 per share).

On September 30, 2004, the Company issued 300,000 to employees as a bonus with a fair value of $99,000 ($0.33 per share).

During 2004, the Company issued 1,790,000 shares of common stock to employees with a fair value of $565,500 ($0.32 per share) for bonuses. This transaction was exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act because it did not involve a public offering.

During 2004, the Company issued 5,199,967 shares of common stock to employees with a fair value of $1,137,099 ($0.22 per share) as regular compensation. This transaction was exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act because it did not involve a public offering.

During 2004, the Company issued 1,100,000 shares of common stock to executives with a fair value of $240,542 ($0.22 per share) as compensation. This transaction was exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act because it did not involve a public offering.

During 2004, the Company issued 3,885,410 shares of common stock for consulting services with a fair value of $812,141 ($0.21 per share). This transaction was exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act because it did not involve a public offering.

During 2004, the Company issued 1,350,000 shares of common stock for consulting services with a fair value of $377,500 ($0.28 per share). This transaction was exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act because it did not involve a public offering.

20

INFINIUM LABS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
 
During 2004, the Company issued 150,000 shares of common stock for advisory services with a fair value of $37,500 ($0.25 per share). This transaction was exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act because it did not involve a public offering.

On January 4, 2005, the Company issued 40,000 shares of common stock to a Director for services with a fair value of $63,600 ($1.59 per share). This transaction was exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act because it did not involve a public offering.

During January 2005, the Company issued 125,179 shares of common stock for consulting services with a fair value of $108,929 ($0.87 per share). This transaction was exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act because it did not involve a public offering.

On January 28, 2005, the Company issued 1,200,000 shares of common stock for consulting services with a fair value of $648,000 ($0.54 per share). This transaction was exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act because it did not involve a public offering.

On March 10, 2005, the Company issued 100,000 shares of common stock for consulting services with a fair value of $32,000 ($0.32 per share). This transaction was exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act because it did not involve a public offering.

On March 11, 2005, the Company issued 800,000 shares of common stock to a Director for services with a fair value of $272,000 ($0.34 per share). This transaction was exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act because it did not involve a public offering.

During March 2005, the Company issued 1,722,453 shares of common stock for consulting services with a fair value of $558,847 ($0.32 per share). This transaction was exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act because it did not involve a public offering.

On March 28, 2005, the Company issued 225,000 shares of common stock to employees with a fair value of $56,250 ($0.25 per share) as compensation. This transaction was exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act because it did not involve a public offering.

(C) Stock Issued for Legal Settlement

During February 2004, the Company issued 66,668 shares of common stock with a fair value of $98,335 ($1.475 per share) in partial settlement of a lawsuit.

On June 4, 2004, the Company issued 53,332 shares of common stock with a fair value of $77,565 in final settlement of a lawsuit ($1.455 per share).

(D) Stock Issued for Cash with Notes Payable

During 2004, the Company issued 560,000 shares of common stock with a fair value of $434,000 as additional consideration for a note payable. The fair value of the stock was allocated from the total proceeds received on the note payable and the resulting discount on the note payable will be amortized over the life of the note ($0.78 per share).

21

INFINIUM LABS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
 
During 2004, the Company issued 200,000 shares of common stock with a fair value of $284,000 as additional consideration for a note payable. The fair value of the stock was allocated from the total proceeds received on the note payable and the resulting discount on the note payable will be amortized over the life of the note ($1.42 per share).

During 2004, the Company issued 100,000 shares of common stock with a fair value of $147,500 as additional consideration for a note payable. The fair value of the stock was allocated from the total proceeds received on the note payable and the resulting discount on the note payable will be amortized over the life of the note ($1.475 per share).

During 2004, the Company issued 60,000 shares of common stock with a fair value of $67,800 as additional consideration for a note payable. The fair value of the stock was allocated from the total proceeds received on the note payable and the resulting discount on the note payable will be amortized over the life of the note ($1.13 per share).

During 2004, the Company issued 33,000 shares of common stock with a fair value of $47,190 as additional consideration for a note payable. The fair value of the stock was allocated from the total proceeds received on the note payable and the resulting discount on the note payable will be amortized over the life of the note ($1.43 per share).

During 2004, the Company issued 511,000 shares of common stock with a fair value of $753,725 as additional consideration for a note payable. The fair value of the stock was allocated from the total proceeds received on the note payable and the resulting discount on the note payable will be amortized over the life of the note ($1.475 per share).

During 2004, the Company issued 7,500 shares of common stock with a fair value of $11,025 as additional consideration for a note payable. The fair value of the stock was allocated from the total proceeds received on the note payable and the resulting discount on the note payable will be amortized over the life of the note ($1.47 per share).

During 2004, the Company issued 1,750,000 shares of common stock with a fair value of $735,000 as additional consideration for notes payable. The fair value of the stock was allocated from the total proceeds received on the note payable and the resulting discount on the note payable will be amortized over the life of the notes ($0.42 per share).

(E) Stock Issued for Cash as Interest on Notes Payable

During 2004, the Company issued 375,000 shares to note payable holders for accrued interest on the notes with a fair value of $67,500 ($0.18 per share).
 
22

INFINIUM LABS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
 
(F) Stock Issued Under Loan Default Provisions

During 2004, the Company issued 74,999 shares to a note payable holder under a loan default provision with a fair value of $110,624 ($1.475 per share).
 
During 2004, the Company issued 75,000 shares to a note payable holder under a loan default provision with a fair value of $84,750 ($1.13 per share).
 
During 2004, the Company issued 80,000 shares to a note payable holder under a loan default provision with a fair value of $118,000 ($1.475 per share).
 
During 2004, the Company issued 603,038 shares to a note payable holder under a loan default provision with a fair value of $942,548 ($1.56 per share).
 
During 2004, the Company issued 955,312 shares to a note payable holder under a loan default provision with a fair value of $1,404,309 ($1.47 per share).
 
(G) Stock Issued for Conversion of Notes Payable

On January 6, 2005, the Company issued 7,043,750 shares of common stock to convert a note payable with a fair value of $704,375 ($0.10 per share). The Company recognized a loss of $7,607,250 ($1.08 per share) on the conversion of this note. This transaction was exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act because it did not involve a public offering.

On February 11, 2005, the Company issued 4,925,291 shares of common stock to convert a note payable with a fair value of $1,058,938 ($0.215 per share). The Company recognized a loss of $738,793 ($0.15 per share) on the conversion of this note. This transaction was exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act because it did not involve a public offering.

On March 22, 2005, the Company issued 5,815,069 shares of common stock to convert a note payable with a fair value of $581,507 ($0.10 per share). The Company recognized a loss of $130,412 ($0.022 per share) on the conversion of this note. This transaction was exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act because it did not involve a public offering.
 
(H) In Kind Contribution
 
During 2004, 1,191,450 shares of common stock were returned to the Company by a stockholder and recorded as an In Kind Contribution.
 
(I) Stock Dividend
 
During January 2004, the Company declared a 4 for 1 common stock dividend effected to stockholders of record on January 19, 2004. Per share and weighted average share amounts have been retroactively restated in the accompanying financial statements and related notes to reflect this dividend.
 
23

INFINIUM LABS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
 
(J) Stock Split
 
During May 2004, the Company declared a 4 for 1 common stock split effected to stockholders of record on May 5, 2004. Per share and weighted average share amounts have been retroactively restated in the accompanying financial statements and related notes to reflect this dividend.
 
(K) Stock Issued in Reverse Merger
 
On January 5, 2004, the Company issued 16,156,000 shares of common stock for all the outstanding shares of Global Business Resources.
 
All of these transactions were exempt from registration requirements of Section 4(2) of the Securities Act as transactions not involving a public offering.
 
(L) Obligation to Reserve Stock
 
As of March 31, 2005, the Company had an obligation to reserve 46,656,000 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of debentures. In addition, as of March 31, 2004, the Company had outstanding options and warrants totaling 45,824,901 shares of common stock.

(M) Amendment to Articles of Incorporation

On February 24, 2005, the Company amended its Articles of Incorporation to provide for an increase in its authorized share capital. The authorized capital stock increased to 600,000,000 common shares at a par value of $0.0001 per share.

NOTE 4 INCOME TAXES

Income tax expense (benefit) is summarized as follows:
 
 
   
Three Months Ended March 31, 2005
   
Three Months Ended March 31, 2004
   
December 9, 2002 (Inception) through March 31, 2005
 
Current:
                   
Federal
 
$
-
 
$
-
 
$
-
 
State
   
-
   
-
   
-
 
Deferred - Federal and State
   
-
   
-
   
-
 
                     
Income tax expense (benefit)
 
$
-
 
$
-
 
$
-
 


24

INFINIUM LABS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
 
The Company's tax expense differs from the "expected" tax expense as follows:
 
 
   
Three Months Ended March 31, 2005 
   
Three Months Ended March 31, 2004
   
December 9, 2002 (Inception) through March 31, 2005
 
                     
U.S. Federal income tax expense (benefit)
 
$
(4,781,711
)
$
(2,120,914
)
$
(17,021,834
)
Effect on net operating loss carryforward
   
4,781,711
   
2,120,914
   
17,021,834
 
                     
   
$
-
 
$
-
 
$
-
 


The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:

 
   
March 31, 2005
(Unaudited)
   
December 31, 2004
 
Deferred tax assets:
             
Net operating loss carryforward
 
$
17,021,834
 
$
12,240,123
 
Total gross deferred tax assets
   
17,021,834
   
12,240,123
 
Less valuation allowance
   
(17,021,834
)
 
(12,240,123
)
               
Net deferred tax assets
 
$
-
 
$
-
 
 
At March 31, 2005, the Company had a net operating loss carryforward of $50,064,219 for U.S. Federal income tax purposes available to offset future taxable income expiring through 2025. The net change in the valuation allowance during the three months ended March 31, 2005 was an increase of $4,781,711.

NOTE 5 COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

(A) Distribution Agreements

Riverdeep, Inc.
Infinium signed a distribution agreement with Riverdeep, Inc. ("Riverdeep") that will allow Infinium to market Riverdeep's catalog of award-winning video games and edutainment software on the Phantom Game System. The agreement expires on March 30, 2006 and authorizes Infinium to distribute Riverdeep's products, via the Phantom Game Service or pre-load, onto the Phantom Game Receiver. The titles will be available to subscribers of the Phantom Game Service on both a pay-per-play and pay-to-own basis.

25

INFINIUM LABS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
 
The agreement with Riverdeep requires Infinium to make the following guaranteed, non-refundable, irrevocable, non-transferable license fees as follows:

March 30, 2004
 
$
50,000
 
June 30, 2004
   
50,000
 
September 30, 2004
   
125,000
 
         
Total
 
$
225,000
 

In addition, Infinium incurs license fees with respect to each unit of product distributed. These per unit license fees shall be applied against the aforementioned guaranteed license fees. Once the guaranteed license fees have been earned down and recouped by Infinium, then Infinium shall pay directly to Riverdeep the per unit license fees for every unit of product it distributes. The per unit unlimited license (pay-to-own) fee ranges from $6.50 to $28.00 per title. The per unit limited license (pay-per-play) fee equals fifty percent (50%) of Infinium's revenue realized from the limited licenses granted to end users.

As the Company has not commenced sales of the game system and there is no definitive way to determine the future economic benefit associated with the payments for the guaranteed license fees, the company has expensed the guaranteed license fees as incurred. From December 9, 2002 (inception) through March 31, 2005, $225,000 of guaranteed license fees had been accrued and reported on the accompanying financial statements.

In the event that the per unit license fees exceed the guaranteed license fees, those per unit license fees will be expensed as incurred. Accordingly, the corresponding revenue related to the product distribution will be recognized as earned.

The Company is currently in default of this agreement.

Codemasters Software Company Ltd.
Infinium signed a distribution agreement with The Codemasters Software Company Ltd. (“Codemasters”) that will allow Infinium to market Codemasters’ catalog of video games software on the Phantom Game System. The agreement expires on December 31, 2005 and authorizes Infinium to distribute Codemasters’ products, via the Phantom Game Service or pre-load, onto the Phantom Game Receiver. The titles will be available to subscribers of the Phantom Game Service on both a pay-per-play and pay-to-own basis.

The agreement with Codemasters requires Infinium to make the following advance royalty payments as follows:

November 21, 2004
 
$
25,000
 
Upon receipt of the Licensor Deliverables
   
25,000
 
         
Total
 
$
50,000
 

In addition, Infinium incurs royalty fees with respect to each unit of product distributed. These per unit royalty fees shall be applied against the aforementioned advance royalty payments. Once the advance royalty payments have been earned down and recouped by Infinium, then Infinium shall pay directly to Codemasters the per unit royalty fees for every unit of product it distributes. The per unit royalty fee ranges from 25% to 50% of Infinium’s net receipts with a minimum per unit royalty fee ranging from $1.25 to $7.16 per title.

26

INFINIUM LABS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
 
As the company has not commenced sales of the game system and there is no definitive way to determine the future economic benefit associated with the advance payments, the company has expensed the advance royalty payments as incurred. From December 9, 2002 (inception) through March 31, 2005, $50,000 of guaranteed license fees had been accrued and reported on the accompanying financial statements.

In the event that the per unit royalty fees exceed the advance royalty payments, those per unit royalty fees will be expensed as incurred. Accordingly, the corresponding revenue related to the product distribution will be recognized as earned. The Company is currently in default of this agreement.

Atari, Inc.
Infinium signed a distribution agreement with Atari, Inc. (“Atari”) that will allow Infinium to market Atari’s catalog of video games software on the Phantom Game System. The agreement expires on September 14, 2007 and authorizes Infinium to distribute Atari’s products, via the Phantom Game Service or pre-load, onto the Phantom Game Receiver. The titles will be available to subscribers of the Phantom Game Service on both a pay-per-play and pay-to-own basis.

The agreement with Atari requires Infinium to make the following non-refundable advance royalty payments as follows:

September 19, 2004
 
$
300,000
 
September 29, 2004
   
200,000
 
         
Total
 
$
500,000
 

In addition, Infinium incurs royalty fees with respect to each unit of product distributed. These per unit royalty fees shall be applied against the aforementioned advance royalty payments. Once the advance royalty payments have been earned down and recouped by Infinium, then Infinium shall pay directly to Atari the per unit royalty fees for every unit of product it distributes. The per unit royalty fee ranges from $5.00 to $15.00 per title.

As the company has not commenced sales of the game system and there is no definitive way to determine the future economic benefit associated with the advance payments, the company has expensed the advance royalty payments as incurred. From December 9, 2002 (inception) through March 31, 2005, $500,000 of guaranteed license fees had been accrued and reported on the accompanying financial statements.

In the event that the per unit royalty fees exceed the advance royalty payments, those per unit royalty fees will be expensed as incurred. Accordingly, the corresponding revenue related to the product distribution will be recognized as earned. The Company is currently in default of this agreement.

27

INFINIUM LABS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
 
Eidos Inc.
Infinium signed a distribution agreement with Eidos Inc. (“Eidos”) that will allow Infinium to market Eidos’s catalog of video games software on the Phantom Game System. The agreement expires on December 31, 2005 and authorizes Infinium to distribute Eidos’s products, via the Phantom Game Service or pre-load, onto the Phantom Game Receiver. The titles will be available to subscribers of the Phantom Game Service on both a pay-per-play and pay-to-own basis.

The agreement with Eidos requires Infinium to make the following non-refundable advance royalty payments as follows:

September 25, 2004
 
$
62,500
 
Upon receipt of the Licensor Deliverables
   
62,500
 
         
Total
 
$
125,000
 

In addition, Infinium incurs royalty fees with respect to each unit of product distributed. These per unit royalty fees shall be applied against the aforementioned advance royalty payments. Once the advance royalty payments have been earned down and recouped by Infinium, then Infinium shall pay directly to Eidos the per unit royalty fees for every unit of product it distributes. The per unit royalty fee ranges from 25% to 50% of Infinium’s net receipts

As the company has not commenced sales of the game system and there is no definitive way to determine the future economic benefit associated with the advance payments, the company has expensed the advance royalty payments as incurred. From December 9, 2002 (inception) through March 31, 2005, $125,000 of guaranteed license fees had been accrued and reported on the accompanying financial statements.

In the event that the per unit royalty fees exceed the advance royalty payments, those per unit royalty fees will be expensed as incurred. Accordingly, the corresponding revenue related to the product distribution will be recognized as earned. The Company is currently in default of this agreement.

Enlight Inc.
Infinium signed a distribution agreement with Enlight Interactive Inc. (“Enlight”) that will allow Infinium to market Enlight’s catalog of video games software on the Phantom Game System. The agreement expires on September 2, 2009 and authorizes Infinium to distribute Enlight’s products, via the Phantom Game Service or pre-load, onto the Phantom Game Receiver. The titles will be available to subscribers of the Phantom Game Service on both a pay-per-play and pay-to-own basis.

28

INFINIUM LABS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
 
The agreement with Enlight requires Infinium to make the following non-refundable advance royalty payments as follows:

October 2, 2004
 
$
5,000
 
Upon receipt of the Licensor Deliverables
   
5,000
 
         
Total
 
$
10,000
 

In addition, Infinium incurs royalty fees with respect to each unit of product distributed. These per unit royalty fees shall be applied against the aforementioned advance royalty payments. Once the advance royalty payments have been earned down and recouped by Infinium, then Infinium shall pay directly to Enlight the per unit royalty fees for every unit of product it distributes. The per unit royalty fee ranges from 30% to 50% of Infinium’s net receipts

As the company has not commenced sales of the game system and there is no definitive way to determine the future economic benefit associated with the advance payments, the company has expensed the advance royalty payments as incurred. From December 9, 2002 (inception) through March 31, 2005, $10,000 of guaranteed license fees had been accrued and reported on the accompanying financial statements.

In the event that the per unit royalty fees exceed the advance royalty payments, those per unit royalty fees will be expensed as incurred. Accordingly, the corresponding revenue related to the product distribution will be recognized as earned. The Company is currently in default of this agreement.

(B) Development Agreement

The company has a development agreement in place with BIOSTAR for the Phantom Game Receiver mainboard and graphics adapter. Terms are: $156,000 due at signing; $78,000 due before ship of pilot production units from Biostar; $78,000 due on acceptance of pilot units. The end design product will be wholly owned by the company. This work is ongoing. From December 9, 2002 (inception) through March 31, 2005, $312,000 of expenses have been accrued and reported on the accompanying financial statements. No payments have been made to Biostar.

(C) Litigation

On October 27, 2003, SensAble Technologies, Inc. filed a complaint against Infinium in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware, alleging federal trademark infringement, federal trademark dilution, federal unfair competition, and Delaware common law unfair competition regarding the trademark "Phantom". The complaint sought damages, injunctive relief against Infinium's use of the name "Phantom", surrender of the Company's website www.phantom.com withdrawal of trademark applications for the "Phantom" mark and other unspecified damages. The complaint was settled in full via a $150,000 payment to SensAble Technologies on January 10, 2005 per the Second Amendment to Concurrent Use and Settlement Agreement dated May 28, 2004. As a condition of the Second Amendment to Concurrent Use and Settlement Agreement dated May 28, 2004, Sensable Technologies subsequently returned their 120,000 shares of common stock after receipt of the $150,000 payment in 2005.

29

INFINIUM LABS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
 
SBI-USA, LLC

On or around November 24, 2004, SBI-USA, LLC, filed suit against us and our chief executive officer, Timothy M. Roberts, in United States District Court, Central District of California. The suit alleges breach of contract and fraud and seeks to recover damages of approximately $600,000 under a contract that we terminated with plaintiff, as well as punitive damages and attorney's fees. In connection with the breach of contract claim, the plaintiff alleges that, since March 6, 2004, we raised more than $30 million in financing and owe plaintiff 2% of all amounts received. In connection with the fraud claim, plaintiff claims that we represented that plaintiff would be our exclusive investment banker during the term of the agreement with plaintiff, and that we hired a competing firm. Prior to filing suit, plaintiff demanded that we pay approximately $66,000 in unpaid expenses as full compensation for amounts due under the agreement. Shortly following our refusal to do so absent documentation of the claimed expenses, plaintiff initiated this suit. Our counsel has advised us that this suit is completely meritless and we intend to vigorously defend it.

A default to the suit was entered against Timothy Roberts on January 5, 2005, but no default judgment has been entered. A motion to set aside the default was filed on February 7, 2005 and set to be heard on March 21, 2005. The complaint was settled in full via a $55,000 payment to SBI-USA, LLC on April 4, 2005. As of March 31, 2005, the Company has accrued expenses of $55,000 for this settlement.

KB Networks, Inc., Kyle Bennett and Steve Lynch

KB Networks, Inc., Kyle Bennett and Steve Lynch v. Infinium Labs, Inc. and Timothy Roberts was filed on February 27, 2004 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division. The case bore the Cause Number 3:04-CV-423-D.

The parties to the proceeding are identified in the style set forth above. The Complaint asserted only claims for declaratory relief. In this regard, the Complaint did not seek any compensatory damages whatsoever. The subject matter of the Complaint arose out of the publication by the Plaintiffs of an article about the Defendants on a website maintained by the Plaintiffs. That publication took place on September 17, 2003. Defendants sent the Plaintiffs cease and desist letters asserting that the article was defamatory in a number of respects. Defendants also asserted that the use of Infinium Labs, Inc.’s registered marks constituted a violation of the Lanham Act and otherwise constituted trademark infringement. The Original Declaratory Judgment Complaint was filed in order to obtain a declaratory judgment that the publication of the article was not defamatory and that the Plaintiffs’ use of Infinium Labs, Inc.’s trademarks in connection with the article did not constitute infringement and was an act of fair use.

30

INFINIUM LABS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
 
Rather than respond to the Complaint, Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss the Complaint asserting that the Court lacked both subject matter and personal jurisdiction. However, rather than provide a timely ruling on the Motion to Dismiss, the Court allowed the Plaintiffs to engage in discovery related to the question of personal jurisdiction. However, the Plaintiffs’ tactics during this discovery phase of the action were extremely burdensome and expensive. Accordingly, the decision was made to terminate the litigation by consenting to the exercise of personal jurisdiction and responding to the Complaint in such a way as to concede that the article did not give rise to any liability for the Plaintiffs as a result of its publication. As a result, the District Court entered a declaratory judgment declaring that the Plaintiffs were not liable to the Defendants as a result of the publication of the article.
 
During the dismissal process, the Plaintiffs asserted a right to recover sanctions against the Defendants for their conduct during the discovery phase of the litigation. The Plaintiffs asserted a sanction claim in the approximate amount of $100,000. Rather than continue to litigate the question of sanctions, the company agreed to pay the Plaintiffs the sum of $50,000 to completely terminate the litigation. As a result, the final declaratory judgment was ultimately entered terminating the litigation with prejudice. In this regard, the Agreed Declaratory Judgment terminating the litigation in all respects was entered by the Court on February 16, 2005.

In re Certain Fax Blasts

A confidential, non-public SEC investigation entitled “In re Certain Fax Blasts” is ongoing. The Company has provided documents in response to SEC subpoenas, and two Company employees, including the CEO, have testified in the investigation concerning, among other things, events at the Company. The Company’s response to the SEC subpoenas is continuing.
 
Infinium Labs, Inc., Timothy M. Roberts and Robert Shambro v. Digital Interactive Streams, Inc. and Royal O’Brien, Case No. 2004-CA-8193-NC in the Circuit Court for Sarasota County, Florida.
 
The Complaint was filed on August 29, 2004. The basis of the Complaint is that the Defendants, DiStream and O’Brien, breached an Agreement of Settlement dated August 3, 2004.
 
The Agreement of Settlement was to settle DiStream and O’Brien’s claims against Infinium, Roberts and Shambro filed in the Circuit Court for Duval County, Florida in Case No. 2004-CA-28840-CV-B. The Agreement of Settlement provided that Infinium would pay DiStream $500,000 at prescribed times between August 16, 2004 and January 31, 2005 and would pay DiStream 1,000,000 warrants to purchase common stock. The Agreement also provided that both parties agreed to cease and desist disseminating disparaging or otherwise unfavorable remarks against the other. The first payment of $50,000 was due on August 16, 2004. On August 13, 2004, Infinium sent DiStream the first installment of $50,000. However, on August 14, 2004, DiStream and O’Brien substantially and materially breached the Settlement Agreement (and also a Non-Disclosure Agreement) by having Infinium’s Phantom prototype console delivered to the QuakeCon 2004 Conference where O’Brien appeared on stage with the Phantom prototype console, raised a huge hammer over his head as if to smash the Phantom prototype to bits in front of hundreds of cheering fans at the conference and allowed someone else to smash and destroy the console. The context for this part of the Quakecon Conference was to criticize Infinium and its product and appearing on stage in this context was an overt act of disparagement of Infinium and unfavorable to its product.
 
31

INFINIUM LABS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
 
Infinium has filed a four count Complaint against DiStream and O’Brien. Count III asks the Court to enter a declaratory judgment establishing that Plaintiffs are discharged from performing under the Settlement Agreement because DiStream and O’Brien disseminated disparaging conduct and remarks at the Quakecon 2004 Conference and published this disparagement in front of hundreds of attendees, portraying DiStream and O’Brien’s disdain for the Infinium product and that this was a material breach of the Agreement discharging Infinium from having to perform under the Settlement Agreement.
 
A counterclaim has been filed by DiStream and O’Brien for damages under the Settlement Agreement, i.e., for failing to pay the first installment of $50,000 on August 16, 2004, the balance of the payments totaling $500,000 and failure to tender the 1,000,000 warrants.
 
The pleadings have been finalized. The parties are in the process of attempting to take depositions, although DiStream and O’Brien’s counsel are presently taking the position that they do not have to come to Sarasota where the case is pending to submit themselves to deposition. The Company has not reserved any amount as of March 31, 2005 for this litigation.
 
Except as described above, we are not a party to any litigation other than litigation arising in the ordinary course of its business, which is not expected to have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations and has not accrued any amounts relating to any litigation.

(D) Licenses

We have entered into agreements with a number of publishers to provide content for our Phantom Game Service. These agreements provide that we pay an advance to each publisher, which is recoupable by us against future royalties payable to these publishers under their respective agreements. We currently owe an aggregate of $885,000 to these publishers pursuant to these agreements and if we fail to pay these advances, these agreements may be terminated.
 
NOTE 6 STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS
 
(A) Stock Options Issued Under Qualified Stock Option Plan
 
Under the 2004 Incentive Stock Option Plan, the Company may grant incentive stock options to its employees, officers, directors, and consultants of the Company to purchase up to 25,000,000 shares of common stock. Under the plan, the exercise price of each option equals or exceeds the market price of the Company’s stock on the date of grant, and the options’ maximum term is five years. Options are granted at various times and are exercisable per a 36 month vesting period.
 
32

INFINIUM LABS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
 
During the three months ended March 31, 2005, the Company granted 0 stock options to employees. During 2004, the Company granted 18,505,000 stock options to certain employees during the year ended December 31, 2004. The Company applies APB Opinion No. 25 and related interpretations in accounting for stock options issued to employees. Accordingly, no compensation cost has been recognized for options issued to employees. Had compensation cost been determined based on the fair market value at the grant date, consistent with SFAS 123, the Company’s net income (loss) would have changed to the pro-forma amounts indicated below.
 
 
         
Three Months Ended March 31, 2005
   
Three Months Ended March 31, 2004
   
December 9, 2002 (Inception) through March 31, 2005
 
Net loss available to common shareholders
   
As Reported
 
$
(14,063,856
)
$
(6,237,982
)
$
(50,064,219
)
 
   
Pro Forma 
 
$
(14,063,856
)
$
(6,237,982
)
$
(57,182,969
)
                           
Basic and diluted loss per share
   
As Reported
 
$
(0.11
)
$
(0.07
)
$
(0.59
)
 
   
Pro Forma 
 
$
(0.11
)
$
(0.07
)
$
(0.67
)
 
The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The cost of the options was calculated based on the amount of vested shares as the vesting period is the same as the service period of the options (3 years). Based on the common stock share price, the weighted average shares equal the primary EPS on the income statement for the three months ended March 31, 2005, the three months ended March 31, 2004 and from December 9, 2002 (Inception) through March 31, 2005 of $(0.11), $(0.07) and $(0.59), respectively.
 
A summary of the status of Company’s fixed stock option plan as of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 is presented below:
 
     
March 31, 2005 (Unaudited) 
   
December 31, 2004 
 
Fixed Options
   
Shares
   
Weighted Average Exercise Price
   
Shares
   
Weighted Average Exercise Price
 
                           
Outstanding at beginning of period
   
-
 
$
-
   
-
 
$
-
 
Cancelled
   
-
 
$
-
   
-
 
$
-
 
Granted
   
18,505,000
 
$
1.43
   
18,505,000
 
$
1.43
 
Forfeited
   
3,355,000
 
$
1.43
   
3,355,000
 
$
1.43
 
Expired
   
-
 
$
-
   
-
 
$
-
 
Exercised
   
-
 
$
-
   
-
 
$
-
 
Outstanding at end of period
   
15,150,000
 
$
1.43
   
15,150,000
 
$
1.43
 
                           
Options exercisable at period end
   
6,321,529
         
5,184,862
       
                           
Weighted average fair value of options granted to employees during the year
 
$
1.43
       
$
1.43
       
 

 
33

INFINIUM LABS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
 
 
 
 Options Outstanding
 
 Options Exercisable
   
Range of Exercise Price
 
 Number Outstanding at
March 31, 2005 (Unaudited)
 
 Weighted Average Remaining
Contractual Life
 
 Weighted Average Exercise Price
 
Number Exercisable at
March 31, 2005 (Unaudited)
 
 Weighted Average Exercise Price
                       
$
0.00 - 0.99 
 
-  
 
-  
$
-  
 
-  
$
-  
$
1.00 - 1.99 
 
15,150,000 
 
4.5 
 
1.43 
 
6,321,529 
 
1.43 
     
15,150,000 
 
4.5 
$
1.43 
 
6,321,529 
$
1.43 

 
 
 Options Outstanding
 
 Options Exercisable
 
Range of Exercise Price
 
Number Outstanding at December 31, 2004
 
Weighted Average Remaining
Contractual Life
 
Weighted Average
Exercise Price
 
Number Exercisable at
 December 31, 2004
 
Weighted Average Exercise Price
                       
$
0.00 - 0.99 
 
-    
 
-    
$
-    
 
-    
$
-    
$
1.00 - 1.99 
 
15,150,000 
 
4.5 
 
1.43 
 
5,184,862 
 
1.43 
     
15,150,000 
 
4.5 
$
1.43 
 
5,184,862 
$
1.43 
 
(B) Warrants Issued and Outstanding

   
March 31, 2005
 
December 31, 2004
Warrants for common stock issued to investors. The term of the warrants are five years expiring November 10, 2009. The warrants are exercisable at $0.10 per share
 
5,873,288 
 
5,107,081 
         
Warrants for common stock issued to an investor. The term of the warrants are five years expiring November 10, 2009. The warrants are exercisable at $0.10 per share.
 
11,630,138 
 
8,722,604 
 
 
34

INFINIUM LABS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
 
 
         
Warrants for common stock issued to note holders. The term of the warrants are five years expiring October 22, 2009. The warrants are exercisable at $0.50 per share.
 
500,000 
 
500,000 
         
Warrants for common stock issued to note holders. The term of the warrants are five years expiring October 27, 2009. The warrants are exercisable at $0.50 per share.
 
500,000 
 
500,000 
         
Warrants for common stock issued to note holders. The term of the warrants are five years expiring December 31, 2009. The warrants are exercisable at $0.26667 per share.
 
5,437,487 
 
5,437,487 
         
Warrants for common stock issued to note holders. The term of the warrants are five years expiring December 31, 2009. The warrants are exercisable at $0.75 per share.
 
5,437,487 
 
5,437,487 
         
Warrants for common stock issued to note holders. The term of the warrants are five years expiring December 31, 2009. The warrants are exercisable at $1.00 per share.
 
5,437,487 
 
5,437,487 
         
Warrants for common stock issued to note holders. The term  of the warrants are five years expiring December 31, 2009. The warrants are exercisable at $0.10 per share.
 
4,687,485 
 
4,687,485 
         
Total
 
39,503,372 
 
35,829,631 

NOTE 7 GOING CONCERN
 
As reflected in the accompanying financial statements, the Company is in the development stage with no sales and has recurring losses from inception of $50,064,219, has a working capital deficiency of $13,294,231, a stockholders deficiency of $12,614,810 and has a negative cash flow from operations of $14,303,807 from inception. This raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent on the Company’s ability to raise additional capital and implement its business plan. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

35

INFINIUM LABS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
 
Management believes that actions presently being taken to obtain additional funding and implement its business plan provide the opportunity for the Company to continue as a going concern.

NOTE 8 RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The Company issued a director 800,000 shares of common stock as consideration for the director's personal guaranty of a $500,000 note payable secured by a real estate mortgage encumbering the director's residence.

The Company compensated the Chief Executive Officer $50,000 as consideration for the Chief Executive Officer's personal guaranty of a $1,500,000 note payable secured by a real estate mortgage encumbering the Chief Executive Officer's residence.

On January 27, 2005, the Company borrowed $300,000 from Timothy Roberts, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, under a 15% promissory note, which is payable no later than April 27, 2005. This note is currently in default.

NOTE 9 SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

(A) Notes Payable

On April 8, 2005, the Company borrowed $300,000 under a 17% convertible promissory note, which is payable no later than July 7, 2005. The Company recognized beneficial conversion on the promissory note of $180,000. The beneficial conversion is being treated as a discount to the note and the discount is being amortized over the life of the note.

On April 29, 2005, the Company borrowed $200,000 under a 17% convertible promissory note, which is payable no later than July 28, 2005. The Company recognized beneficial conversion on the promissory note of $180,000. The beneficial conversion is being treated as a discount to the note and the discount is being amortized over the life of the note.

(B) Common Stock Issuances

On April 11, 2005, the Company issued 7,825,000 shares of common stock to convert the 15% promissory note dated June 21, 2004 with a fair value of $1,565,000 ($0.20 per share). The Company recognized a loss of $234,750 on the conversion of this note. This transaction was exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act because it did not involve a public offering.

During April 2005, the Company issued 1,395,669 shares of common stock for consulting services with a fair value of $283,890 ($0.20 per share).

36

INFINIUM LABS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
 
During April 2005, the Company issued 100,000 shares of common stock to an employee with a fair value of $26,000 ($0.26 per share). This transaction was exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act because it did not involve a public offering.

On April 18, 2005, the Company issued 250,000 shares of common stock for consulting services with a fair value of $45,000 ($0.18 per share). This transaction was exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act because it did not involve a public offering.

During April 2005, the Company issued 601,725 shares of common stock to employees with a fair value of $108,311 ($0.18 per share).

On May 3, 2005, the Company issued 28,065 shares of common stock for consulting services with a fair value of $4,771 ($0.17 per share).

During May 2005, the Company issued 678,067 shares of common stock to employees with a fair value of $108,491 ($0.16 per share).

During May 2005, the Company issued 2,936,644 shares of common stock to convert the 15% promissory note dated May 7, 2004 with a fair value of $293,664 ($0.10 per share) and the Company issued 5,873,288 warrants exercisable at $0.10 per share. The Company recognized a loss of $69,863 on the conversion of this note. This transaction was exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act because it did not involve a public offering.

(C) Litigation

Sue Bohle & Associates d/b/a The Bohle Company

Sue Bohle & Associates d/b/a The Bohle Company v. Infinium Labs, Inc., Case No. 2005-CA-3604-NC in the Circuit Court for Sarasota County, Florida. The Complaint was filed on or about April 14, 2005. The basis of the Complaint is that Infinium breached its contract with Plaintiff by allegedly failing to pay for public relations services performed by Plaintiff pursuant to the Contract. Plaintiff has alleged damages in the amount of $262,151.63 plus interest and attorneys' fees. On or about May 2, 2005, Infinium filed its Answer, denying Plaintiff's allegations and asserting a number of affirmative defenses.

Infinium's defenses notwithstanding, the Parties have engaged in settlement negotiations and expect to file a joint Stipulated Motion for Entry of Final Judgment. The negotiated settlement will consist of shares of Infinium common stock sufficient to satisfy Plaintiff's alleged damages.

37

 
ITEM 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operations

Forward Looking Statements

Certain information included in this Form 10-QSB contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These statements represent the Company’s expectations or beliefs, including, but not limited to, statements concerning its plans, strategies, operations and objectives. For this purpose, any statements contained in this Form 10-QSB that are not statements of historical fact may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. Words such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “could,” “estimate” or “continue” or similar words are intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements are identified by those words. Forward-looking statements by their nature involve substantial risks and uncertainties, certain of which are beyond the Company’s control. Actual results may differ materially depending on a variety of important factors such as those described in the Company’s Form 10-KSB filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 20, 2005. All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this Form 10-QSB. The Company has not undertaken to update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

THE MERGER
 
On January 5, 2004, the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary merged with and into Infinium Labs Operating Corporation, with Infinium Labs Operating Corporation surviving as its wholly owned subsidiary. Infinium Labs Operating Corporation was incorporated in the State of Delaware on December 9, 2002 for the purpose of developing a video game service and system. In connection with the merger and related transactions, the Company changed its name from Global Business Resources, Inc. to Infinium Labs, Inc. Infinium Labs Operating Corporation’s stockholders acquired 82.35% of the Company’s outstanding common stock and its directors and officers became the Company’s directors and officers. Since the completion of the merger, the Company’s business has consisted of the business and operations of Infinium Labs Operating Corporation. When used in this Form 10-QSB, references to Phantom and Infinium Labs are references to its trademarks or service marks with respect to which the Company has filed applications for registration with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

COMPANY OVERVIEW

We are launching the Phantom Game Service, a broadband game delivery system designed for consumers to purchase and play games. The Phantom Game Service is a platform to deliver on-demand games, allowing consumers to search, preview and play a large selection of games online via a broadband Internet connection.

Currently the Company's business activities are solely dedicated to the development of the Phantom Game Receiver and the Phantom Game Service. Infinium's Product Development engineering team has successfully completed and tested the advanced beta version of the Phantom Game Receiver and Phantom Game Service as demonstrated at the 2005 Consumer Electronics Show (CES). The Company has entered into content distribution agreements that include 4 of the top ten; game companies that represent collectively 1/3 of the PC games sales market according to PC Data's July report.  (see http://www.npd.com/). While we continue to define our retail distribution partners, the Company does not believe that securing proper retail distribution partners will be an issue.

The Company is currently seeking funding for the launch of the Phantom Game Service and manufacture of the Phantom Game Receiver. Management estimates that the Phantom Game Receiver and Phantom Game Service will be available for launch 120-150 after it has secured funding of the first $11.5 million.

38

 
The Phantom Game Receiver is a "family room" unit derived from existing PC (Personal Computer) technologies and designed to work seamlessly with the Phantom Game Service. The Phantom Game Receiver and Service provide integration of broadband receiver hardware, subscription-based service and streaming game delivery network, allowing consumers to try, purchase and play PC-based games from a catalog of new and classic titles from the comfort of their living room.

To access the Phantom Game Service, our customers will pay a monthly subscription fee. Subscribers will have access to a number of free games and will be able to purchase or demo games from a library of titles. Subscribers will have access to community features and will be able to learn about the latest games and to try new release titles. If subscribers purchase a game, they will have full access to the title for the life of their subscription, as well as access to any modifications, updates or additional content made available for the game.

The Phantom Game Receiver is a "family room" unit that is designed to fit in an entertainment center and be integrated into a family's home entertainment system. The Phantom Game Receiver connects to any standard television, as well as A/V receivers. The Phantom Game Receiver accesses the Phantom Game Service by connecting to a broadband Internet connection, such as a cable or DSL line or through existing home networks, including wireless home networks. The Phantom Game Receiver is equipped with a "lapboard," which consists of a keyboard and mouse, and can also be used with a console-style game controller. The Phantom Game Receiver features multiple controller ports to enable multi-player gaming and additional ports to provide flexibility for specialized peripherals.

The Phantom Game Receiver differs from current game consoles in a number of significant respects. First, it is built from components that are not proprietary and which are readily available. Its primary components consist of a central processing unit, high-end video processor, high-speed memory, computer motherboard and large hard disk drive. The Phantom Game Receiver also differs from PCs in that it is designed for game play, not to perform other functions such as data processing. This dedicated functionality enables the Phantom Game Receiver to preserve operating resources in order to provide game-play performance.

Additionally, the Phantom Game Receiver does not use external media to play games. The Phantom Game Receiver only plays content downloaded through the Phantom Game Service, The Phantom Game Receiver does not use disks, cartridges or other media that can be easily lost, damaged or copied. Instead, content is downloaded in real time to the internal hard drive of the Phantom Game Receiver to enable game play.

The primary technical characteristics of the receiver are expected to include:

* Display: Any TV
* HDTV Compatible
* Connectivity: Any broadband connection
* Processor: Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) Sempron family
* Graphics Processor: NVIDIA 3D graphics accelerator
* System Memory: 256 Megabyte
* Dolby digital 5.1 Channel Audio
* Operating System: Microsoft Windows XP Embedded
* Hard Disk Drive: 80GigaByte hard drive w/ intelligent cache management
* Accessories: Wireless Lapboard and game pad controllers to be sold separately
* Wide variety of input and output connectors
* Sophisticated security, digital rights management (DRM) and content encryption
* Transparent patches and upgrades
* Client updates add new features to the service
* Content management keeps games fresh and reliable

The Phantom Game Service will be delivered on a hardware and backend platform that makes it possible to securely deliver games directly to consumers over broadband Internet access networks. The Phantom Game Service will use hosted infrastructure for content servers, which will store games and other content and provide for e-commerce transactions. Games will be stored in a proprietary, compressed, encrypted store and distributed over a secure, encrypted connection from our servers.

39

 
INFINIUM OPPORTUNITIES

OVERVIEW

Our Phantom Game Service is designed to address the four principal deficiencies identified in the current video game distribution model in order to provide the following significant benefits to publishers, retailers and consumers:

WINDOWS-BASED PLATFORM

The Phantom Game Receiver enables consumers to receive games via the Phantom Game Service. The Phantom Game Receiver and Phantom Game Service are compatible with all PC games developed for the Windows operating system - literally thousands of PC games that have been developed over the years.

UNLIMITED SPACE FOR GAME SOFTWARE

The Phantom Game Service will be deliver games into customers' living rooms securely over broadband Internet access networks. Our content servers will store all of the games and provide for all e-commerce transactions. There is essentially no limit to the number of games that can be stored and made available to our customers, and as a result, we intend to offer a robust catalog of both new releases and previously released games.

INCREASED PROFITABILITY

The Phantom Game Service offers both publishers and developers a content distribution platform that eliminates production, packaging, and retail merchandising costs (including open box returns) from their gross revenues. In addition, both publishers and developers can continue to earn revenues on games that are no longer on retail shelves. The Phantom Game Service can offer publishers and developers a virtually unlimited lifespan of revenue earning for each of their PC games.

CLOSED SYSTEM PREVENTS PIRACY

The Phantom Game Service is a "private" network that runs over any broadband Internet connection. The Phantom Game Service can be accessed only by subscribers though the Phantom Game Receiver. The Phantom Game Receiver is designed as a "closed box" with no removable media and employs a series of authentication protocols. The Phantom Game Service and the Phantom Game Receiver have been designed to ensure security in order to protect game content from piracy.

CONTENT STRATEGY

The Company has entered into content agreements with 11 PC game publishers and developers, representing over 500 titles for launch. The content distribution agreements include four of the top ten game companies that represent collectively 1/3 of the PC games market according to PC Data's July report.  (see http://www.npd.com/). The Company has not yet made payments to some of these publishers, and our failure to make payments could result in cancellation of these agreements. The Company currently owes these entities an aggregate of $885,000 and intends to pay the developers and publishers with the proceeds derived from additional bridge financing transaction and by issuing additional shares of equity. The Company communicates frequently with our content partners about our financing status.

We have signed agreements with the following content providers:

Atari
Chronic Logic
Codemasters
Eidos
Enlight Interactive
Framework Studios
Gamerblitz
Gameware
Max Gaming Technologies
GarageGames.com
O-3 Entertainment
Riverdeep
Vivendi Universal Games

40

 
These games will be available for purchase through the Phantom Game Service and publishers will receive a percentage of the revenue generated by the sales of these games. We believe that this arrangement represents an extremely attractive proposition for game publishers because no additional work is required of the Publishers to distribute a game developed for PCs to our subscriber base via the Phantom Game Service. With no extra engineering effort or assumed costs, publishers can access a new distribution channel for past, current and future PC games and receive incremental revenues from existing investments.

Because the Phantom Game Service does not have the shelf space restrictions faced by traditional software retailers, we expect to offer a much broader range of games than that offered in a traditional retail environment, including a large cross-section of games for families and games for children. Unlike traditional video game consoles, the Phantom Game Receiver does not require "exclusive" or platform-specific content in order to operate.

To date, we have been successful in securing front-line, high-profile game release in our content agreements with game publishers.

The company has negotiated terms with over 20 publishers or developers of video game content. These publishers and developers are listed below with the status and salient terms of the agreements. Many of the publishers and developers have given consent to be included in the Company’s content announcement even though final agreements were not signed.

Our standard program includes a definition of Net which is the actuals of credit card processing fees, refunds, rebates, returns, allowances and adjustments, taxes, duties or other governmental charges on production, sales, transportation, delivery, importation or use and bad debit.

1) Garage Games - including:

 
2)
21-6 Productions

 
3)
Brave Tree

Status: Signed Contract
Term: Multi-Year
Revenue Share on Game Titles Purchased
Minimum Royalty: N/A
Advance: None
Definition of Net: Standard Program

4) Max Gaming Technologies.
Status: Signed Contract
Term: Multi-Year
Revenue Share on Game Titles Purchased
Minimum Royalty: N/A
Advance: None
Definition of Net: Standard Program

5) Atari
Status: Signed Contract
Term: Multi Year
Revenue Share on Game Titles Purchased
Minimum Royalty: Yes - Varies by Game
Advance: Yes
Definition of Net: Royalty on Gross Billing

41

 
6) Chronic Logic
Status: Signed Contract
Term: Multi Year
Revenue Share on Game Titles Purchased
Minimum Royalty: No
Advance: No
Definition of Net: Standard Program

7) Codemasters
Status: Signed Contract
Term: 1 Year w/ Auto Renewal
Revenue Share on Game Titles Purchased
Minimum Royalty: Yes- varies by game
Advance: Yes
Definition of Net: Standard Program + withholding taxes

8) Dreamcatcher Interactive
Status: Terms finalized but agreement is not signed; approval to list in press release
Term: 1 Year w/1 year auto renewal
Revenue Share on Game Titles Purchased
Minimum Royalty: No 
Advance: Yes
Definition of Net: Standard Program

9) eGames.com
Status: In Negotiations; approval to list in Press Release
Term:
Revenue Share:
Minimum Royalty:
Advance:
Definition of Net:

10) Eidos
Status: Signed Contract
Term: 1 year
Revenue Share on Game Titles Purchased
Minimum Royalty: No
Advance: Yes
Definition of Net: Standard Program

11) Enlight Interactive
Status: Signed Contract
Term: Multi Year
Revenue Share on Game Titles Purchased
Minimum Royalty: No
Advance: Yes
Definition of Net: Standard Program

12) Framework Studios
Status: Signed Contract
Term: Multi Year
Revenue Share on Game Titles Purchased
Minimum Royalty: No
Advance: No
Definition of Net: Standard Program

13) GamerBlitz
Status: Signed Contract
Term: 1 Year w/ Auto Renewal
Revenue Share on Game Titles Purchased
Minimum Royalty: No
Advance: No
Definition of Net: Standard Program

42

 
14) Gameware Development
Status: Signed Contract
Term: Multi Year
Revenue Share on Game Titles Purchased
Minimum Royalty: No
Advance: No
Definition of Net: Standard Program

15) Global Software Publishing
Status: Terms finalized but not Signed; approval to include in press release
Term: Multi Year
Revenue Share on Game Titles Purchased
Minimum Royalty: No
Advance: No
Definition of Net: Standard Program

16) Interplay
Status: In Final Negotiations; approval to include in press release
Term:
Revenue Share:
Minimum Royalty:
Advance:
Definition of Net:

17) Kuju Interactive
Status: Final but not signed
Term: Multi Year
Revenue Share on Game Titles Purchased
Minimum Royalty: No
Advance: No
Definition of Net:  Standard Program

18) Kuma Reality Games
Status: Negotiating; approval to include in press release
Term:
Revenue Share
            Front Line Titles:
            Catalog Titles:
            Digital Distribution Only Titles:
Minimum Royalty:
Advance:
Definition of Net:

19) Legacy Interactive
Status: Negotiating; approval to include in press release
Term: 
Minimum Royalty:
Advance:
Definition of Net:

20) O-3 Entertainment
Status: Signed
Term: Multi Year
Revenue Share on Game Titles Purchased
Minimum Royalty: No
Advance: No
Definition of Net: Standard Program

43

 
21) Riverdeep
Status: Signed
Term: 18 Months
Revenue Share on Game Titles Purchased
Minimum Royalty: Yes- varies by game
Advance: Yes
Definition of Net: Standard Program

22) Skunk Studios
Status: Negotiating; approval to include in press release
Term: 
Revenue Share
Minimum Royalty:
Advance:

23) Vivendi Universal Games
Status: Signed Contract
Term: Multi Year
Revenue Share on Game Titles Purchased
Minimum Royalty: No
Advance: Yes

The Company currently has outstanding balances in the sum of $885,000 owed to publishers and developers. These content providers include Riverdeep, Codemasters, Atari, Inc., Enlight Interactive, Vivendi Universal and Eidos. Due to the outstanding balances, these content providers may elect to terminate their agreements with the Company and not provide content now or in the future. This would add risk to the success of the Phantom Game Service and to viability of the Company.

The Company believes that based on Ms. Schoback’s resignation and the outstanding balances due to the above noted content suppliers, there is additional risk in securing the content needed to fully populate the service. However it should be noted that due to the fact that the Company only requires the Gold Master version of each PC-based game, there is no new production on the part of publishers and developers of game content and any revenues are purely incremental. This is to say that no content provider has expended significant financial resources against producing product for the Phantom Game Service and while the Company may have less than ideal relations with the content community at this time, the viability of repairing any damaged relationship is feasible and no out of pocket financial risk on the part of publishers or developers is at stake.

DISTRIBUTION STRATEGY

We intend to market and sell the Phantom Game Service, the Phantom Game Receiver and related accessories primarily through retail channels.

Our retail partner program is designed to generate new recurring revenue streams for retailers from the sale of the Phantom Game Service. Retailers will receive a percentage of the subscription revenue and games purchased over the life of the subscription in addition to their profit margin from sales of the Phantom Game Receiver. In today’s model there is no commitment from the consumer to return to the same retailer for additional purchases nor is there a monthly service fee for the retailer to share revenue from. Under our model the original selling retailer will receive a recurring revenue stream in two forms from each consumer they sell to 1) they will receive a percentage of the monthly service fee and 2) they will receive a percentage of each additional titles purchased through the receiver. We are in the process of entering into distribution agreements with prominent retail partners in order to provide the Phantom Game Service with nationwide retail coverage.

44

 
We have contracted with Pinnacle Marketing Group and Summit Sales to assist Infinium Labs with securing retail channel distribution for the Phantom Game Service. Pinnacle Marketing Group is based in Minneapolis where Target and Best Buy corporate reside. Summit Sales is based in Richmond Virginia were Circuit City corporate is located. By working with these two firms we are able to provide local support to our potential retail partners. The fees associated with this agreement are 3% retail price of the Phantom Receiver

The terms of these agreements include:

The Company appoints Pinnacle Marketing Group and Summit Sales as exclusive Sales Representatives for its products in assigned territories.

Representative’s compensation shall be a 3% commission on “net sales” of hardware and accessories.

The agreements will continue for one year unless terminated earlier and shall renew automatically unless notified by Company with at least 90-day notice in writing. The agreements may be terminated by either party with at least 45 days notice in writing.

Upon termination, Representative shall be entitled to a commission on all orders which are in place, dated or communicated to the Company prior to effective date of termination and severance equal to one month’s average commission for every year of service with a maximum total server of five months.

Pinnacle Market Group and Summit Sales territories are defined as Target, Best Buy and Circuit City stores in the geographic areas each sales representative currently operates.

We are negotiating terms with retail partners. We have presented term sheets to Electronic Boutique, however, negotiations have been suspended pending the completion of the merger of Electronic Boutique and GameStop. We have presented terms to Best Buy, Circuit City and Target. We expect to contract one of the three within 120 days. All contracts include 10% - 20% gross margin on the Phantom Receiver, 10% - 40% on Phantom accessories, 10% revenue share on the monthly subscription and approximately 10% on Phantom game purchases.

COMPETITION

OVERVIEW

While we are not aware of any direct competitors to our Phantom Game Service, we still face indirect competition from other gaming platforms, game developers and distributors and PC gaming services.

GAMING PLATFORMS

The gaming platforms that are most dominant in the market today are Sony PlayStation2, Microsoft Xbox, Nintendo GameCube and PCs. The following is a summary comparison of the strengths and weaknesses we see in each of these systems:

The Phantom Game Service and Phantom Game Receiver are designed to take advantage of the strengths of the PC platform without being subject to the weaknesses inherent in the platform. We believe that the Phantom Game Service and Phantom Game Receiver will compete with other systems based on the games available for each system, price of the system and games, reputation and convenience. Our ability to compete effectively with these existing platforms will depend heavily on our ability to acquire desirable game content for the Phantom Game Service and Phantom Game Receiver and to achieve attractive price points.

GAME DEVELOPERS AND DISTRIBUTORS

While the Phantom Game Receiver competes with other video game consoles, the Phantom Game Service also competes with other game developers and distributors. While the Phantom Game Service presents an opportunity for distributors of PC games to sell their games through a new channel, we will compete with game developers and distributors whose games are designed for the proprietary platforms of the video game console manufacturers. Because we will initially have a small installed base, developers and distributors of games for the dominant video game consoles may be reluctant to alienate the video game console manufacturers by providing content for the Phantom Game Service. Furthermore, although we look at retailers as partners and customers and believe the Phantom Game Service offers them a compelling opportunity, some retailers may view us as a competitor because the Phantom Game Service will sell games directly to subscribers, where otherwise the retailers might enjoy a direct sales relationship with those customers. Once customers have purchased the Phantom Game Receiver and become subscribers to the Phantom Game Service, we believe that to remain competitive, we must maintain a software portfolio that is attractive enough to cause subscribers to continue using the Phantom Game Service rather than switching to another platform.

45

 
PC GAME SERVICES

The past several years have seen the introduction of on-demand gaming services on the PC. These services include Yahoo! Games, Comcast Games on Demand and RealNetworks' RealArcade, as well as other services from or enabled by such companies as Exent Technologies, Trymedia Systems and Stream Theory. We believe that these services complement our offering and legitimize the category of games-on-demand, but are restricted by the limitations of the PC as an entertainment platform, by concerns over PC-based piracy and by reluctance on the part of game publisher to distribute their newest games online due to perceived channel conflicts with traditional retail.

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY STRATEGY

We will rely on a combination of patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret laws, as well as confidentiality procedures and contractual restrictions, to establish and protect our intellectual property rights.

With respect to patents, we intend to protect all aspects of technologies associated with the make and use of the Phantom Game Service and Phantom Game Receiver through both design and utility patent applications in the United States and potentially in other countries in which we intend to market our products and services. The Phantom Game Service and Phantom Game Receiver will also utilize proprietary software that we develop.

We are pursuing federal registration of our trademarks and service marks in the United States with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. We have applied for registration of the marks INFINIUM LABS, INFINIUM LABS (with Infinity Design), PHANTOM, PHANTOM (with Helmet Design), the Phantom Helmet Design No. 1, the Phantom Helmet Design No. 2, BLACK KNIGHT, BLACKNIGHT, VIRTUAL PRIVATE GAME NETWORK, VPGN, PAY PER PLAY, BUILT BY GAMERS FOR GAMERS and ANY GAME, ANY TIME. The trademark and service mark applications were filed for use in connection with either or both "interactive computer game consoles" in International Class 9, and/or "entertainment services, namely, providing interactive computer gaming network that allows end-users to demo, rent, purchase and play computer games" in International Class 41.

Infinium Labs has filed the following patents:

Patent Title
   
Number
   
Filed
   
Expires
 
Video Game Platform and User Interface
   
60/569,187
   
5/7/04
   
5/7/05
 
The Method for Automatic Patching of a Sparsely Streamed Application
   
10/953,313
   
9/29/04
   
9/29/24
 
Method and Apparatus for Backlighting of a Keyboard for Use with a Game Device
   
10/910,510
   
8/2/04
   
8/2/24
 
 
46


US Patents are pending.  60/569,187 is a provisional patent filing that will be supplemented with multiple utility and design patent filings in April 2005 i.e.

Patent Title
   
Status
   
Filed
 
Modified Keyboard and Systems Containing Keyboard
   
Final edits
   
unfiled
 
Multi-Mode Pointing Device
   
Final edits
   
unfiled
 
System for Securely Booting a Computer Device
   
Final edits
   
unfiled
 
Multiposition Multilevel User Interface System
   
Final edits
   
unfiled
 
Design Patent - Receiver
   
Draft
   
unfiled
 
Design Patent - Lapboard
   
Draft
   
unfiled
 
Design Patent - Mouse
   
Draft
   
Unfiled
 
 
Although we do not believe that our trademarks or service marks infringe the rights of third parties, third parties have in the past asserted, and may in the future assert, trademark infringement claims against us which may result in costly litigation or which require us to either settle or obtain a license to use third-party intellectual property rights.

PLAN OF OPERATION

We are currently in the development stage of operations and expect to be in that mode for at least the next three to six months. Our goal is to commence the launch of the Phantom Game Service in the fourth quarter of 2005. Our primary mission is to sell video games to consumers who subscribe to our service, which is a combination of gaming hardware, software and secure online digital distribution.

The Company is characterized as a development company until it launches the Phantom Game Service. All product development and testing is near complete. The company does not face risk associated with development, but the company faces certain risk if it fails to secure the required funding to launch the service. At this point management feels that there exists a 9-12 month window to bring the product to market without a competitor taking first mover advantage.

Any delays in launch are not based on product development or content acquisition, as those key elements are in place. Any delays to market are based upon securing the proper amount of funding required to fund the existing Operating Plan. The Company anticipates that it will take 120-150 days to bring the service to market, post funding. Most of that time will be required to manufacture and ship the Phantom Game Receiver and to complete the Electronic Content Delivery.

In the situation where the Company fails to raise the required $11.5 million to launch the Phantom Gaming Service, the company has contingency plans to carry the business going forward. One such scenario involves the Company allowing other hardware manufactures to produce the Phantom Game Receiver. In this example the company's business will be Content Acquisition, Channel Programming and Electronic Content Distribution.

The company has hit all its internal milestones for product development, content licensing and marketing planning. The Phantom Game Receiver has been designed; working prototypes have been built and tested. The Company has contractually secured an ample amount of premium games content to launch its Service. The content delivery has been designed and is awaiting development. The initial subscriber sell thru milestone is 3,000 subscribers in the first month of launch.

47

 
We intend to pursue product development and marketing activities, concentrating primarily on the creation of the Phantom Game Service and on generating consumer demand. We are in the latter stages of negotiations with PC component suppliers and contract manufacturers to provide engineering support services, necessary parts and fabrication and assembly of hardware units. We are also in the latter stages of negotiations with data center operators to host our servers and with other providers to perform our customer support functions. Consistent with our business strategy, we have entered into a development agreement with respect to the engineering and industrial design of the Phantom Game Service.

Infinium Labs, Inc., has development agreements with Teague and BIOSTAR(R) Microtech International Corp. for engineering and industrial design of the Phantom Game Service. The company had two contracts with Walter Dorwin Teague for development of the industrial design of the Phantom Game Receiver and Lapboard. Terms were standard time and materials, work-for-hire. The work is complete and the company owns the designs. The company is filing design and utility patents to cover this work. The company has a development agreement in place with BIOSTAR(R) for the Phantom Game Receiver mainboard and graphics adapter. Terms are: 1/2 the total amount ($156k) due at signing; 1/4 ($78k) due before ship of pilot production units from Biostar to IFLB; 1/4 ($78k) due on acceptance of pilot units by IFLB. The end design product will be wholly owned by the company. This work is ongoing.

We have identified a core group of potential customers/distribution partners for the Phantom Game Service and Phantom Game Receiver and continue to meet with these potential partners on a regular basis. We expect to announce some of our distribution partners during the second quarter of 2005.

Our goal is to enter into distribution arrangements with several or more of these parties whereby each partner will purchase the Phantom Game Receiver through a purchase order process and resell the systems to their customers. In exchange, these partners will receive a share of the recurring subscription and/or software sales/rental revenues.

We have contracted with Pinnacle Marketing Group and Summit Sales to assist Infinium Labs with launching the Phantom Game Service into the retail channel.

In keeping with our goal to develop a library of available games, over 20 publishers, including Vivendi Universal Games, Atari Inc., Riverdeep and Eidos, have agreed to supply content. We currently are in negotiations with many other major game publishers with which we expect to build similar content-supplying relationships.

We have signed agreements with the following content providers:

Atari
Chronic Logic
Codemasters
Eidos
Enlight Interactive
Framework Studios
Gamerblitz
Gameware
GarageGames.com
Max Gaming Technologies
O-3 Entertainment
Riverdeep
Vivendi Universal Games

The following are estimated prices for the Phantom Game Receiver, a basic monthly subscription, an enhanced subscription and games that might be included in a basic subscription.

Phantom Game Receiver: $299.95
Activation Fee: $19.99 one time fee
Basic Subscription: $19.95 monthly, with a 2 year commitment. Enhanced Subscription: (not available at launch)
Game Store: $9.95-$54.95 per game purchased, depending on title.

48

 
We expect subscribers will able to play up to 10 games per month out of Phantom's Basic Tier library of over 200+ titles (over $300 game play value per month). Each month the subscriber may choose to pick new games, continue to play the same games or purchase any favorites from the previous month. The final value proposition for the basic tier is subject to further consumer testing and modification.

Some examples of games that may be included in the Basic Subscription are:

Unreal Tournament, Quake, Men of Valor, Mafia, Neverwinter, Nights, Baldur's Gate, Sacred, Vampire the Masquerade: Redemption, Civilization: Call to Power II, Tropico, Railroad Tycoon II Platinum Edition, Battleground 5: Antietam, Deus Ex, Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six, Uru: Ages Beyond, Myst, Deer Hunter 2004, Backyard Baseball, Backyard Basketball, Backyard Soccer, Microsoft Links Golf , Pro Bass Fishing, Austin Powers Pinball, Celebrity Deathmatch, Tournament Chess 2, Pitfall: Mayan Adventure, Trivial Pursuit.

Phantom Game Store allows subscribers the ability to purchase any game, anytime from an extensive library of over 500 titles. Once purchased the downloaded games remain on the hard drive of subscriber's Phantom Game Receiver, where updates, versions and patches are maintained by the Company. The library of available games at launch range from recent releases to classic favorites, the Phantom Game Store offers something for everyone in the family ranging in price from $9.95 to $54.95

Examples of Games in the Phantom Store are: Unreal Tournament 2004, Far Cry, Call of Duty,Tom Clancy's Splinter Cell: Pandora Tomorrow, Warcraft III, Beyond Good and Evil, The Suffering, Rise of Nations.

The consumer will own all the games he or she downloads to the Phantom Game Receiver and will not lose the games if the consumer cancels his or her subscription. Subject to local hard drive space, purchased games can still be played on the Phantom Game Receiver after the consumer cancels his or her subscription. If the consumer renews the subscription, full access to all games will be restored.

At this point in time, the company has achieved the following milestones: The Phantom Game Console has been designed; working prototypes have been built and tested. The Company has contractually secured game content to launch its Service. The content delivery has been designed and is awaiting development. The unachieved component is securing at least $11.5 million in funding for launch. The Company will require approximately 120-150 days post financing to launch the Phantom Gaming Service. The initial subscriber sell thru milestone is 3,000 subscribers in the first month of launch.

The Company’s target date for a limited regional rollout of 10,000 units of the Phantom Game Service is Q4 2005. This date and the milestones listed below are contingent upon raising sufficient capital, as also noted on the schedule below. The Company has failed to meet its operating milestones in the past due to insufficient funding on the operating timetable and has thus shifted launch date on numerous occasions.

The Company believes, based on past performance, that there is a high likelihood that sufficient capital will not be available on the timeline outlined below and many or all of these milestones will be missed and the launch date will again shift and/or the company will go out of business

There are however contingency options in place in the event that these milestones are not met, which are also outlined below the following table.

49

 
Period
Capital Requirements
Detail
Q2 2005
$ 2,306,000 G&A, Salary, Benefits, T&E, Marketing & Product Development
 
$ 2,306,000 Total Expense
Marketing
Milken Event Los Angeles
E3 Los Angeles (May 17-20)
Microsoft DevCon (May 9-12)
Public Relations Retainer
Public Relations Expenses
Corporate Branding
Business Trade Media Relations
Web Site/Search Engine Optimization
 
Product Development
Patent Completion and Filing
System Board Development
Lapboard Development
Receiver Enclosure Development
Sample Hardware
Hardware Development Tools
Prototypes
BIOS Development
Prototype Engineering
Usability Testing
UI Redesign
Tooling
e-commerce Development Specs
Content Delivery Network
 
Q3 2005
$ 703,000 G&A, Salary, Benefits, T&E
 
$ 2,763,000 Marketing Costs
 
$ 2,372,000 Product Development
 
$ 656,000 e-commerce Development
 
$ 6,494,000 Total Expense
Marketing
Secure Print Media
Secure Local Spot Media
Begin Internet Marketing
Secure Promotions
Hire Agencies
Develop Retail Channel Displays
Begin Creative Development
Begin Public Relations
 
Product Development
Pilot Program - 100 Test Units
Tooling
Parts
Assembly Line
 
e-commerce Development
Service Hosting
Service Bandwidth
Customer Service
Billing Systems
e-commerce Development Completion
Content Delivery Network Completion
 
Q4 2005
$ 703,000 G&A, Salary, Benefits, T&E
 
$ 5,800,000 Marketing and Manufacturing
 
$ 550,000 e-commerce Development
 
$ 7,053,000 Total Expense
 
REVENUE: $3,500,000
Marketing
Begin Local Spot Media
Continue Print Media
Continue Internet Marketing
Execute Promotions
Execute Channel Marketing
Continue Public Relations
Plan for CES
 
Manufacturing
Manufacture and Regional Rollout of 10,000 Units
 
Q1 2006
$ 703,000 G&A, Salary, Benefits, T&E
 
$ 4,375,000 Marketing
 
$12,305,000 Manufacturing
 
$ 1,061,000 e-commerce Development
 
$18,444,000 Total Expense
 
REVENUE: $9,787,000
Marketing
Trade Show - CES
Continue local Spot Media
Continue Print Media
Continue Internet Marketing
Execute Promotions
Execute Channel Marketing
Continue Public Relations
Plan for E3
 
Manufacturing
Manufacture and National Rollout of 25,000 Units
 
Total
04/05 - 03/06
$34,297,000 Total Expense
 
TOTAL REVENUE: $13,287,000
 
 
50

 
Contingencies

Provided the company is not successful in securing the necessary capital required to fund this operating plan the company will seek an Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) to produce the Phantom Gaming Console. This would alleviate some portion of headcount expense and all of the hardware manufacturing expense.

CASH REQUIREMENTS

We estimate that based on our current business strategy, we will have operating cash requirements over the next twelve months of approximately $22,200,000. We estimate we will need approximately $11,500,000 to launch the Phantom Game Service and sell the first 10,000 units of the Phantom Game Receiver, as follows:

Operating expenses, including employee salaries and benefits, office expenses, rent expense, legal and accounting, financing fees, publicity, investor relations, net of payables
 
$
3,600,000
 
Marketing
   
3,100,000
 
Manufacturing of Inventory (Net of Revenues)
   
3,600,000
 
Capital Expenditures
   
1,200,000
 
Total Cash Requirements
 
$
11,500,000
 
After launch, we estimate that we will need approximately $10,700,000 to achieve cash flow break-even, as follows:

         
Operating expenses, including employee salaries and benefits, office expenses, rent expense, legal and accounting, financing fees, publicity, investor relations, net of payables
 
$
11,200,000
 
Marketing
   
17,100,000
 
Manufacturing of Inventory (Net of Revenues)
   
(18,100,000
)
Capital Expenditures
   
500,000
 
Total Cash Requirements
 
$
10,700,000
 
 
Our estimate of operating expenses represents the expenditures we anticipate incurring in the operation of our business. Our estimated operating expenses for the next 16 months includes $7,600,000 of employee salaries and corresponding benefits.

In addition to negotiations with the debt holders to convert their notes to equity in order to reduce our debt service expense, we are seeking additional financing because we require substantial working capital. Although, we do not have any agreements or arrangements as of date for addition financing, if we raise additional financing through the issuance of equity, equity-related or convertible debt securities, those securities may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of the holders of our common stock. The issuance of additional common stock or securities convertible into common stock by us will also have the effect of further diluting the proportionate equity interest and voting power of holders of our common stock. In addition, we do not close on sufficient financing, we will be unable to launch our service when currently planned.

51

 
We will seek to increase consumer demand for the Phantom Game Service through a number of significant marketing programs, ranging from traditional paid advertising to sponsorships and publicity. We maintained a significant presence at the 2004 Electronic Entertainment Expo (E3), which was held May 12-14, 2004, at the Los Angeles Convention Center. This event is the preeminent annual sales conference for the video game industry, and we showcased the Phantom Game Receiver and Phantom Game Service during this event. We estimate that our marketing plan will require approximately $20,200,000 over the next 16 months, dedicated to the following activities:

Expected Marketing Budget Breakdown
12 Month Forecast
         
Marketing, Promotions & Channel
 
$
8,900,000
 
Advertising
   
6,900,000
 
Printing, Reproduction and Website
   
3,300,000
 
Trade Shows
   
1,100,000
 
     Total
 
$
20,200,000
 
 
Assumptions:

·  
Total subscribers acquired (less churn/theft) in 12 month period: 97,981
·  
Per subscriber acquisition cost: 10,000 subscribers in 3 month regional launch: $310
·  
Per subscriber acquisition cost: 87,981 in remaining 9 months: $150
·  
Total 12 month marketing budget: $16.7M (including past due accounts payable)

The basis for the expected marketing budget assumptions is an analysis combining annual marketing spends or subscriber acquisition costs (SAC) of similar or competitive products and services and a per-market media plan associated with key reach, frequency and conversion rate metrics.

Comparables included TiVO, Sirius Satellite Radio, Direct TV, XM Satellite Radio and NetFlix. Information was gathered primarily from publicly available information such as SEC filings.

However, no firm launch date has been set thus the expected marketing budget breakdown will continue to be revised in reaction to seasonality, market forces, competition and the Company’s ability to raise sufficient capital. It is possible that significantly more marketing budget will be needed or substantially less.

Based on the comparable analysis and per-market reach, frequency and conversion rate costs, we have budgeted our per subscriber acquisition cost (SAC) in two phases; $310 per subscriber in a three month, 6 market launch phase with the target of acquiring 10,000 net subscribers and phase two national rollout with a target SAC of $150 to acquire an incremental 87,981 subscribers for the nine months remaining in the first 12 month cycle.

By cross-indexing gamer households and broadband using third party syndicated research from Scarborough, we determined that our first six launch markets would be Boston, San Francisco, Detroit, Dallas, Seattle and San Diego. These markets over index in gamer and broadband households compared with the national average and represent a combined audience of 2.6M targeted potential customers. The Company’s goals are to reach 50% of these potential subscribers with advertising and promotional messages and covert .77% potential customers into paying subscribers.

On a national basis, we have identified over 15 million broadband households with home networks and at least 1 gamer, based on research from Penn, Schoen & Berland, Yankee Group and Parks Associates. The Company will need to reach 50% of this population with advertising and promotional messages and convert 1.28% of this potential customer population into paying subscribers.

The Company needs less than 1% of all households w. a broadband home network to achieve it’s Year 1 forecast of 97,981 subscribers.

52


Rationale for Marketing Spend

$310 Launch SAC (Subscriber Acquisition Cost):
Ø  
Phantom will need incremental funds to jump start channel presence with sales education, incentives and in store kiosks
Ø  
While product recognition is high amongst a small niche of game enthusiasts, Phantom will need to investment spend in initial markets to create greater brand awareness and validity
Ø  
Investment in channel and partner programs will strengthen Phantom’s position in the market
Ø  
Advertising and promotions options locally lack national efficiency. We anticipate higher CPMs (Cost Per Thousand) and greater field/grassroots tactical expense to fund a local launch
Ø  
Heavier A&P (Advertising & Promotions) investment needed to overcome limited launch retail presence
 
$150 National SAC:
Ø  
Phantom intends to invest in specific sales promotional periods and to leverage partnerships with existing vendors to gain awareness and acceptance for the product.
Ø  
We believe our reach and conversion projections are conservative against retailer feedback
Ø  
Publicity efforts and game-industry media outreach will help carry early gross impressions for the brand
Ø  
Steep retail ramp up expected against regional launch should alleviate some A&P expenditure
Ø  
Initial brand investment will alleviate some A&P expenditure
 
Marketing Goals

§  
Establish Phantom’s brand, price point and value proposition
Ø  
Highlight Phantom’s launch offer with convenience, breadth of content, “best in category” performance and great price

§  
Create demand, intent and drive acquisition through retail
Ø  
Ignite the brand with promotions, alliances, events and ideas
Ø  
Inspire retail participation through innovative channel programs
Ø  
Break through the pre-holiday clutter with a compelling thematic

§  
Drive usage, game purchases and build loyalty
Ø  
Superior experience through the integration of hardware and distribution services
Ø  
Customer support and satisfaction is the top priority

§  
Focus on driving value growth attracting the best customer

Marketing Strategies
§  
Launch Phantom Service into key broadband hive (key influencer) markets to stimulate trendsetter buzz among initial enthusiast customer
§  
Roll out Phantom nationally with advertising and promotions that builds off of initial trial and broadens the brand’s scope to include lifestyle and casual gamers
§  
Maximize marketing efforts by focusing expenditures during “retail power periods”
§  
Use advertising and promotion to impact Phantom’s audience at critical stages in the product’s sales cycles
§  
Work with key distributors/vendors on MDF (retail marketing development funds) and promotional partnerships to ensure maximum point-of-sale impact

Launch Campaign Objectives
§  
Plan delivers estimated total men 18-49 impressions of roughly 61million at a reach/frequency of 55/14 and an estimated CPM of $51.29
§  
We believe plan can convert .77% or 10,000 subs in six markets, Men 18-49 with broadband
§  
For plan to be effective, we anticipate a spend of $3 million or $310 per subscriber

53

 
Launch Campaign Calendar - Typical Three Month Period


National Campaign Rationale

§  
TV (32%) - most impact, delivers highest reach, offers immediacy of message, strong brand builder, supports retailer needs for driving availability awareness and most gaming/home electronics brands are built with TV
§  
Print (6%) - supports retailer and co-op needs, is timely, and can reach target audience through placement in heavily read sections (i.e. sports, biz). Use of promotional free-standing-inserts as well to support co-op marketing
§  
Internet (5%) - targeted, efficient, can tie into retailer site for ordering information, locations, etc
§  
Channel (26%) - Marketing development funds - paid to retailers for end-caps, POS materials, sales rep training, FSI inclusion, in-channel promotions
§  
Promotions (6%) - One-to-one, guerilla and on-premise marketing techniques.  Utilize event marketing strategies to demo the product and generate interest from core target groups, develop sweepstakes, giveaways and other direct marketing tactics
§  
Marketing (11%) - includes all agencies that will support the execution of the marketing plan; also include public relations services
§  
Production (5%) - TV spots, print, in-store materials, etc.
§  
Trade Shows (7%) - company will secure space, attend and demo the Phantom Game Service at industry trade shows
§  
Alternative (2%) - developing advertising opportunities through alternative channels such as TiVO, text messaging

National Campaign Mix

$16.7 Million marketing budget is expected to be allocated in the following ways:

54

 
 

§  
Third party vendors will be used to:
§  
Solidify media plan (Media Planning Vendor)
§  
Develop Creative Campaigns (Advertising Agency)
§  
Promotions Vendor will execute promotions, alternative and channel marketing (Promotional Vendor)
§  
Public Relations firm will execute trade shows and editorial outreach
§  
Interactive marketing vendor will execute online campaigns

Acronym definitions

MDF - Marketing Development Funds - a fund established to execute co-marketing programs with retail outlets. These include circulars, aisle-end caps and rebates
Jobbers - Jobbers are people hired to help sell the product in a retail outlet. Jobbers will hand out flyers, answer questions, help restock shelves. Jobbers work for the Company, not the retailer
E3 - The Electronic Entertainment Expo (E3) is the largest video game and interactive entertainment trade show in the world.
CES - The Consumer Electronics Show (CES) is the largest consumer electronics trade show in the world
IEMA - The Interactive Entertainment Merchants Association (IEMA) is a trade organization that facilitates the relationship between publishers/manufacturers and retailers. IEMA hosts an annual trade show to set up meetings between buyers and sellers
Demo Swat Teams & Viral Guerilla Marketing: - Abrupt and interruptive marketing techniques that grab attention and break through clutter. This type of marketing tactic targets and educates key prospect groups that sets trends and creates word of mouth “pass along value”
SMS - A protocol that enables text messages to be sent and received via certain mobile phones. SMS advertising is a new way to reach mobile phone users

Our current strategic plan does not indicate a need for material capital expenditures in the conduct of marketing or distribution activities. Advertising costs are expensed either in the periods in which those costs are incurred or the first time the advertising takes place. We currently employ 6 full-time individuals for marketing, distribution and content acquisition.

The Company believes it has completed all the Research and Development required in launching the Phantom Game Service and Phantom Game Receiver. We continue to refine processes by seeking better, faster and more cost effective ways to deliver our goods and services.

55

 
SOURCES OF CAPITAL

As of March 31, 2005, we had cash on hand of $1,988 which represents the remaining proceeds from the sale of common stock during 2004 for aggregate proceeds of $3,589,987 and from bridge financing transactions completed in an aggregate amount of $12,587,260. These proceeds have been used as follows:
 
$4.5 million
 
Payroll, Payroll Taxes and Employee Benefits
$2.4 million
 
Consultants
$3.2 million
 
Development Costs
$1.5 million
 
Conventions & Trade Shows
$1.5 million
 
Advertising & Marketing
$1.1 million
 
Repay Bridge Financing
 
Balance of funds spent on General & Administrative expenses.

Of the $4.5 million of proceeds used for payroll, payroll taxes and employee benefits, key individuals received gross compensation as follows:
         
Timothy M. Roberts
 
$
110,417
 
Kevin Bachus
 
$
143,750
 
Richard S. Skoba
 
$
156,042
 
 
The Company is actively pursuing additional bridge financing and issuing additional shares of equity into a volatile equity market to meet its capital needs for the short term. In addition, the Company is in negotiations with the debt holders to convert their notes to equity in order to reduce our debt service expense. The Company plans on issuing additional shares of equity into a volatile equity market and using the cash proceeds from the sales of its receiver and service to meet the Company's long term capital needs. If the Company does not close on sufficient bridge financing transactions, issue sufficient additional shares of equity into a volatile equity market or is unable to launch its service when currently planned, the Company will need to raise additional capital from other sources or curtail its proposed spending and delay the product launch date.

ITEM 3. Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this report, we conducted an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act). Based upon this evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission's rules and forms. There was no change in our internal controls or in other factors that could affect these controls during our last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.


56

 
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings:
 
SensAble Technologies, Inc.

On October 27, 2003, SensAble Technologies, Inc. filed a complaint against Infinium in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware, alleging federal trademark infringement, federal trademark dilution, federal unfair competition, and Delaware common law unfair competition regarding the trademark "Phantom". The complaint sought damages, injunctive relief against Infinium's use of the name "Phantom", surrender of the Company's website www.phantom.com withdrawal of trademark applications for the "Phantom" mark and other unspecified damages. The complaint was settled in full via a $150,000 payment to SensAble Technologies on January 10, 2005 per the Second Amendment to Concurrent Use and Settlement Agreement dated May 28, 2004. As a condition of the Second Amendment to Concurrent Use and Settlement Agreement dated May 28, 2004, Sensable Technologies subsequently returned their 120,000 shares of common stock after receipt of the $150,000 payment in 2005.

SBI-USA, LLC

On or around November 24, 2004, SBI-USA, LLC, filed suit against us and our chief executive officer, Timothy M. Roberts, in United States District Court, Central District of California. The suit alleges breach of contract and fraud and seeks to recover damages of approximately $600,000 under a contract that we terminated with plaintiff, as well as punitive damages and attorney's fees. In connection with the breach of contract claim, the plaintiff alleges that, since March 6, 2004, we raised more than $30 million in financing and owe plaintiff 2% of all amounts received. In connection with the fraud claim, plaintiff claims that we represented that plaintiff would be our exclusive investment banker during the term of the agreement with plaintiff, and that we hired a competing firm. Prior to filing suit, plaintiff demanded that we pay approximately $66,000 in unpaid expenses as full compensation for amounts due under the agreement. Shortly following our refusal to do so absent documentation of the claimed expenses, plaintiff initiated this suit. Our counsel has advised us that this suit is completely meritless and we intend to vigorously defend it.

A default to the suit was entered against Timothy Roberts on January 5, 2005, but no default judgment has been entered. A motion to set aside the default was filed on February 7, 2005 and set to be heard on March 21, 2005. The complaint was settled in full via a $55,000 payment to SBI-USA, LLC on April 4, 2005. As of March 31, 2005, the Company has accrued expenses of $55,000 for this settlement.

KB Networks, Inc., Kyle Bennett and Steve Lynch

KB Networks, Inc., Kyle Bennett and Steve Lynch v. Infinium Labs, Inc. and Timothy Roberts was filed on February 27, 2004 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division. The case bore the Cause Number 3:04-CV-423-D.

The parties to the proceeding are identified in the style set forth above. The Complaint asserted only claims for declaratory relief. In this regard, the Complaint did not seek any compensatory damages whatsoever. The subject matter of the Complaint arose out of the publication by the Plaintiffs of an article about the Defendants on a website maintained by the Plaintiffs. That publication took place on September 17, 2003. Defendants sent the Plaintiffs cease and desist letters asserting that the article was defamatory in a number of respects. Defendants also asserted that the use of Infinium Labs, Inc.’s registered marks constituted a violation of the Lanham Act and otherwise constituted trademark infringement. The Original Declaratory Judgment Complaint was filed in order to obtain a declaratory judgment that the publication of the article was not defamatory and that the Plaintiffs’ use of Infinium Labs, Inc.’s trademarks in connection with the article did not constitute infringement and was an act of fair use.

Rather than respond to the Complaint, Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss the Complaint asserting that the Court lacked both subject matter and personal jurisdiction. However, rather than provide a timely ruling on the Motion to Dismiss, the Court allowed the Plaintiffs to engage in discovery related to the question of personal jurisdiction. However, the Plaintiffs’ tactics during this discovery phase of the action were extremely burdensome and expensive. Accordingly, the decision was made to terminate the litigation by consenting to the exercise of personal jurisdiction and responding to the Complaint in such a way as to concede that the article did not give rise to any liability for the Plaintiffs as a result of its publication. As a result, the District Court entered a declaratory judgment declaring that the Plaintiffs were not liable to the Defendants as a result of the publication of the article.
 
57

 
During the dismissal process, the Plaintiffs asserted a right to recover sanctions against the Defendants for their conduct during the discovery phase of the litigation. The Plaintiffs asserted a sanction claim in the approximate amount of $100,000. Rather than continue to litigate the question of sanctions, the company agreed to pay the Plaintiffs the sum of $50,000 to completely terminate the litigation. As a result, the final declaratory judgment was ultimately entered terminating the litigation with prejudice. In this regard, the Agreed Declaratory Judgment terminating the litigation in all respects was entered by the Court on February 16, 2005.

Sue Bohle & Associates d/b/a The Bohle Company

Sue Bohle & Associates d/b/a The Bohle Company v. Infinium Labs, Inc., Case No. 2005-CA-3604-NC in the Circuit Court for Sarasota County, Florida. The Complaint was filed on or about April 14, 2005. The nature of the Complaint is that Infinium breached its contract with Plaintiff by allegedly failing to pay for public relations services performed by Plaintiff pursuant to the Contract. Plaintiff has alleged damages in the amount of $262,151.63 plus interest and attorneys' fees. On or about May 2, 2005, Infinium filed its Answer, denying Plaintiff's allegations and asserting a number of affirmative defenses.

Infinium's defenses notwithstanding, the Parties have engaged in settlement negotiations and expect to file a joint Stipulated Motion for Entry of Final Judgment. The negotiated settlement will consist of shares of Infinium common stock sufficient to satisfy Plaintiff's alleged damages.

In re Certain Fax Blasts

A confidential, non-public SEC investigation entitled “In re Certain Fax Blasts” is ongoing. The Company has provided documents in response to SEC subpoenas, and two Company employees, including the CEO, have testified in the investigation concerning, among other things, events at the Company. The Company’s response to the SEC subpoenas is continuing.
 
Infinium Labs, Inc., Timothy M. Roberts and Robert Shambro v. Digital Interactive Streams, Inc. and Royal O’Brien, Case No. 2004-CA-8193-NC in the Circuit Court for Sarasota County, Florida.
 
The Complaint was filed on 08/20/04. The nature of the Complaint is that the Defendants, DiStream and O’Brien, breached an Agreement of Settlement dated August 3, 2004.
 
The Agreement of Settlement was to settle DiStream and O’Brien’s claims against Infinium, Roberts and Shambro filed in the Circuit Court for Duval County, Florida in Case No. 2004-CA-28840-CV-B. The Agreement of Settlement provided that Infinium would pay DiStream $500,000 at prescribed times between August 16, 2004 and January 31, 2005 and would pay DiStream 1,000,000 warrants to purchase common stock. The Agreement also provided that both parties agreed to cease and desist disseminating disparaging or otherwise unfavorable remarks against the other. The first payment of $50,000 was due on August 16, 2004. On August 13, 2004, Infinium sent DiStream the first installment of $50,000. However, on August 14, 2004, DiStream and O’Brien substantially and materially breached the Settlement Agreement (and also a Non-Disclosure Agreement) by having Infinium’s Phantom prototype console delivered to the QuakeCon 2004 Conference where O’Brien appeared on stage with the Phantom prototype console, raised a huge hammer over his head as if to smash the Phantom prototype to bits in front of hundreds of cheering fans at the conference and allowed someone else to smash and destroy the console. The context for this part of the Quakecon Conference was to criticize Infinium and its product and appearing on stage in this context was an overt act of disparagement of Infinium and unfavorable to its product.
 
Infinium has filed a four count Complaint against DiStream and O’Brien. Count III asks the Court to enter a declaratory judgment establishing that Plaintiffs are discharged from performing under the Settlement Agreement because DiStream and O’Brien disseminated disparaging conduct and remarks at the Quakecon 2004 Conference and published this disparagement in front of hundreds of attendees, portraying DiStream and O’Brien’s disdain for the Infinium product and that this was a material breach of the Agreement discharging Infinium from having to perform under the Settlement Agreement.
 
58

 
A counterclaim has been filed by DiStream and O’Brien for damages under the Settlement Agreement, i.e., for failing to pay the first installment of $50,000 on August 16, 2004, the balance of the payments totaling $500,000 and failure to tender the 1,000,000 warrants.
 
The pleadings have been finalized. The parties are in the process of attempting to take depositions, although DiStream and O’Brien’s counsel are presently taking the position that they do not have to come to Sarasota where the case is pending to submit themselves to deposition.
 
Except as described above, we are not a party to any litigation other than litigation arising in the ordinary course of its business, which is not expected to have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations and has not accrued any amounts relating to any litigation.

Item 2.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds:

On January 5, 2004, the Company issued 69,115,900 shares of restricted common stock as merger consideration to the former stockholders of Infinium Labs Operating Corporation.
 
On January 7, 2004, the Company issued 2,290,000 shares of restricted common stock to eight investors in a private placement for consideration of $572,500 ($0.25 per share).

On January 22, 2004, the Company issued 4,360,000 shares of restricted common stock to 32 investors in a private placement for consideration of $1,090,000 ($0.25 per share).

On February 12, 2004, the Company borrowed $1.4 million under a 15% secured debenture for a maximum term of 12 months. As additional consideration, the Company issued to the holder 80,000 shares of restricted common stock valued at $118,000 ($1.475 per share). The Company subsequently issued 1,638,350 shares of restricted common stock valued at $2,464,857 ($1.50 per share) under loan default provisions. These transactions were exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act because they did not involve any public offering.

On February 23, 2004, the Company borrowed $1.0 million under a 12% secured subordinated debenture for a maximum term of 12 months. As additional consideration, the Company issued to the holder 400,000 shares of restricted common stock valued at $198,000 ($0.495 per share). These transactions were exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act because they did not involve any public offering.

On February 27, 2004, the Company borrowed $500,000 under a 12% secured subordinated debenture for a maximum term of 12 months. As additional consideration, the Company issued to the holder 80,000 shares of restricted common stock valued at $118,000 ($1.475 per share). These transactions were exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act because they did not involve any public offering.

During February 2004, the Company issued 66,668 shares of restricted common stock valued at $98,335 ($1.475 per share) to a single claimant as consideration for the settlement of a lawsuit. This transaction was exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act because it did not involve any public offering.

On March 30, 2004, the Company issued 1,750,000 shares of restricted common stock to six service providers in exchange for services valued at $2,581,250 ($1.475 per share). These transactions were exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act because they did not involve any public offering.

On April 7, 2004, the Company borrowed $500,000 under a 15% promissory note which was payable on December 15, 2004. As additional consideration, the Company issued 200,000 shares of restricted common stock valued at $284,000 ($1.42 per share). These transactions were exempt from section 4(2) of the Securities Act.

On May 7, 2004, the Company borrowed $250,000 under a 15% promissory note, which was payable on September 15, 2004. As additional consideration, the Company issued 100,000 shares of restricted common stock valued at $147,500 ($1.475 per share). This transactions were exempt from registration under section 4(2) of the Securities Act because they did not involve any public offering.

59

 
On May 18, 2004, the Company borrowed $350,000 under a 15% promissory note, which was payable on September June 8, 2004. As additional consideration, the Company issued 7,500 shares of restricted common stock valued at $11,025 ($1.47 per share). This transactions were exempt from registration under section 4(2) of the Securities Act because they did not involve any public offering.

On May 24, the Company issued 279,260 shares of restricted common stock for services with a fair value of $446,816 ($1.60 per share). These transactions were exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act because they did not involve any public offering.

On May 25, 2004, the Company issued 600,000 shares of restricted common stock for services valued at $864,000 ($1.44 per share). This transaction was exempt from registration under section 4(2) of the Securities Act because it did not involve any public offering.

On May 25, 2004, the Company issued 200,000 shares of restricted common stock for services valued at $288,000 ($1.44 per share). This transaction was exempt from registration under section 4(2) of the Securities Act because it did not involve any public offering.

On May 25, 2004, the Company issued 30,000 shares of restricted common stock for services valued at $43,200 ($1.44 per share). This transaction was exempt from registration under section 4(2) of the Securities Act because it did not involve any public offering.

On May 28, 2004, the Company borrowed $350,000 under a 15% promissory note, which was payable on August 2, 2004. As additional consideration, the Company issued 33,000 shares of restricted common stock valued at $47,190 ($1.43 per share). These transactions were exempt from registration under section 4(2) of the Securities Act because they did not involve any public offering.

On June 4, 2004, the Company borrowed $825,000 under a 15% secured convertible promissory note, which was payable no later than June 3, 2005. As additional consideration, the Company issued 511,000 shares of restricted common stock valued at $753,725 ($1.475 per share). The Company subsequently issued 74,999 shares of restricted common stock valued at $110,624 ($1.475 per share) as a penalty for our failure to profile a timely registration statement under the terms of our agreement. These transactions were exempt from registration under section 4(2) of the Securities Act because they did not involve any public offering.

On June 4, 2004, the Company issued 53,332 shares of restricted common stock valued at $77,565 ($1.455 per share) to a single claimant as consideration for the settlement of a lawsuit. This transaction was exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act because it did not involve any public offering.

On June 18, 2004, the Company issued 440,000 shares of restricted common stock for services valued at $404,800 ($0.92 per share). This transaction was exempt from registration under section 4(2) of the Securities Act because it did not involve any public offering.

On June 21, 2004, the Company borrowed $1,500,000 under a 15% promissory note, which was payable no later than June 22, 2004. As additional consideration, the Company issued 60,000 shares of restricted common stock valued at $67,800 ($1.13 per share). The Company subsequently issued 75,000 shares of restricted common stock valued at $84,750 ($1.13 per share) under a loan default provision. These transactions were exempt from registration under section 4(2) of the Securities Act because they did not involve any public offering.

On June 30, 2004, the Company issued 100,000 shares of restricted common stock for services valued at $147,500 ($1.475 per share). This transaction was exempt from registration under section 4(2) of the Securities Act because it did not involve any public offering.

During June 2004, the Company issued 400,000 shares of restricted common stock to an investor for consideration of $100,000 ($0.25 per share). These transactions were exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act because they did not involve any public offering.
 
60

 
On July 28, 2004, the Company borrowed $500,000 under a 15% promissory note which is payable on July 28, 2005 and was guaranteed by a Director. As consideration for the Director's personal guaranty of note, the Company issued the Director 800,000 shares of restricted common stock having a fair value of $832,000 ($1.04 per share). This transaction was exempt from registration under section 4(2) of the Securities Act because it did not involve any public offering.

During August 2004, the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of restricted common stock to a consultant for real estate service with a fair value of $1,130,000 ($1.13 per share). This transaction was exempt from registration under section 4(2) of the Securities Act because it did not involve any public offering.

During August 2004, the Company issued 21,460 shares of restricted common stock to a consultant for services with a fair value of $13,734 ($0.64 per share). This transaction was exempt from registration under section 4(2) of the Securities Act because it did not involve any public offering.

During August, 2004, the Company issued 200,000 shares of restricted common stock to a consultant for financial services with a fair value of $122,000 ($0.61 per share). This transaction was exempt from registration under section 4(2) of the Securities Act because it did not involve any public offering.

During August 2004, the Company issued 36,000 shares of restricted common stock to a consultant for engineering services with a fair value of $21,420 ($0.60 per share). This transaction was exempt from registration under section 4(2) of the Securities Act because it did not involve any public offering.

On August 26, 2004, the Company issued 200,000 shares of restricted common stock to an investor for consideration of $200,000 ($1.00 per share). This transaction was exempt from registration under section 4(2) of the Securities Act because it did not involve any public offering.

On September 30, 2004, the Company issued 300,000 shares of restricted common stock to two employees with a fair value of $99,000 ($0.33 per share). This transaction was exempt from registration under section 4(2) of the Securities Act because it did not involve any public offering.

During August 2004, the Company issued 1,900,400 shares of restricted common stock to 36 investors for total consideration of $475,100 ($0.25 per share). This transaction was exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act because it did not involve a public offering.

On October 8, 2004, the Company issued 40,000 shares of restricted common stock to an employee with a fair value of $20,000 ($0.50 per share). This transaction was exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act because it did not involve a public offering.

On October 18, 2004, the Company issued 100,000 shares of restricted common stock to an employee with a fair value of $38,000 ($0.38 per share). This transaction was exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act because it did not involve a public offering.

On October 21, 2004, the Company issued 50,000 shares of restricted common stock to a consultant for financial services with a fair value of $15,500 ($0.31 per share). This transaction was exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act because it did not involve a public offering.

On October 21, 2004, the Company issued 800,000 shares of restricted common to a consultant for marketing services with a fair value of $232,000 ($0.29 per share). This transaction was exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act because it did not involve a public offering.

On October 20, 2004, the Company borrowed $500,000 under a 10% promissory note which was payable on December 31, 2004. The Company issued 500,000 shares of restricted common stock with a fair value of $155,000 ($0.31 per share) as additional consideration for the note payable. This transaction was exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act because it did not involve a public offering.

On October 27, 2004, the Company borrowed an aggregate of $500,000 under four 10% promissory notes which were payable on December 31, 2004. The Company issued 500,000 shares of restricted common stock with a fair value of $150,000 ($0.30 per share) as additional consideration for these notes payable. This transaction was exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act because it did not involve a public offering.

61

 
On November 10, 2004, the Company issued 1,189,635 shares of restricted common stock to an investor for consideration of $264,075 ($0.22 per share). This transaction was exempt from registration under section 4(2) of the Securities Act because it did not involve any public offering.

On November 17, 2004, the Company issued 700,000 shares of restricted common stock to an employee with a fair value of $196,000 ($0.28 per share). This transaction was exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act because it did not involve a public offering.

On November 17, 2004, the Company issued 200,000 shares of restricted common stock to an employee with a fair value of $56,000 ($0.28 per share). This transaction was exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act because it did not involve a public offering.

On November 18, 2004, the Company issued 500,000 shares of restricted common stock to a consultant for services with a fair value of $130,000 ($0.26 per share). This transaction was exempt from registration under section 4(2) of the Securities Act because it did not involve any public offering.

On December 16, 2004, the Company borrowed an aggregate of $1,160,000 under 15 separate 8% convertible debentures Series 04-02. The Company issued 250,000 shares of restricted common stock with a fair value of $60,000 ($0.24 per share) as additional consideration for these debentures. The aforementioned securities were issued to the Lender by us pursuant to Rule 506 of Regulation D as promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and/or Section 4(2) of the Act.

On December 28, 2004, the Company borrowed an aggregate of $1,000,000 under 14 separate 8% convertible debentures Series 04-03. The Company issued 500,000 shares of restricted common stock with a fair value of $370,000 ($0.74 per share) as additional consideration for these debentures. The aforementioned securities were issued to the Lender by us pursuant to Rule 506 of Regulation D as promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and/or Section 4(2) of the Act.

During December 2004, the Company issued 175,000 shares of restricted common stock to debt holders for interest values at $17,500 ($0.10 per share). This transaction was exempt from registration under section 4(2) of the Securities Act because it did not involve any public offering.

During December 2004, the Company issued 100,000 shares of restricted common stock to debt holders for interest values at $25,000 ($0.25 per share). This transaction was exempt from registration under section 4(2) of the Securities Act because it did not involve any public offering.

During December 2004, the Company issued 100,000 shares of restricted common stock to debt holders for interest values at $25,000 ($0.25 per share). This transaction was exempt from registration under section 4(2) of the Securities Act because it did not involve any public offering.

During December 2004, the Company issued 150,000 shares of restricted common stock to an advisor for advisory services valued at $37,500 ($0.25 per share). This transaction was exempt from registration under section 4(2) of the Securities Act because it did not involve any public offering.

During December 2004, the Company issued 750,000 shares of restricted common stock to an employee with a fair value of $255,000 ($0.34 per share). This transaction was exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act because it did not involve a public offering.

On January 6, 2005, the Company issued 7,043,750 shares of common stock to convert a note payable with a fair value of $704,375 ($0.10 per share). The Company recognized a loss of $7,607,250 ($1.08 per share) on the conversion of this note. This transaction was exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act because it did not involve a public offering.

On January 28, 2005, the Company issued 1,200,000 shares of common stock for consulting services with a fair value of $648,000 ($0.54 per share). This transaction was exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act because it did not involve a public offering.

62

 
On February 11, 2005, the Company issued 4,925,291 shares of common stock to convert a note payable with a fair value of $1,058,938 ($0.215 per share). The Company recognized a loss of $738,793 ($0.15 per share) on the conversion of this note. This transaction was exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act because it did not involve a public offering.

On March 10, 2005, the Company issued 100,000 shares of common stock for consulting services with a fair value of $32,000 ($0.32 per share). This transaction was exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act because it did not involve a public offering.

On March 11, 2005, the Company issued 800,000 shares of common stock to a Director for services with a fair value of $272,000 ($0.34 per share). This transaction was exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act because it did not involve a public offering.

On March 22, 2005, the Company issued 5,815,069 shares of common stock to convert a note payable with a fair value of $581,507 ($0.10 per share). The Company recognized a loss of $130,412 ($0.022 per share) on the conversion of this note. This transaction was exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act because it did not involve a public offering.

On April 11, 2005, the Company issued 7,825,000 shares of common stock to convert a note payable with a fair value of $1,565,000 ($0.20 per share). The Company recognized a loss of $234,750 on the conversion of this note. This transaction was exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act because it did not involve a public offering.

During April 2005, the Company issued 100,000 shares of common stock to an employee with a fair value of $26,000 ($0.26 per share). This transaction was exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act because it did not involve a public offering.

On April 18, 2005, the Company issued 250,000 shares of common stock for consulting services with a fair value of $45,000 ($0.18 per share). This transaction was exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act because it did not involve a public offering.

During May 2005, the Company issued 2,936,644 shares of common stock to convert a note payable with a fair value of $293,664 ($0.10 per share). The Company recognized a loss of $69,863 on the conversion of this note. This transaction was exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act because it did not involve a public offering.

Unless otherwise stated all of the above-referenced securities were issued in a transaction exempt from the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), pursuant to Rule 506 of Regulation D promulgated thereunder based on the following facts (the "Rule 506 Conditions"):

(i) the securities were sold only to accredited investors;

(ii) the securities were not offered by any form of general solicitation or general advertising;

(iii) each investor had represented that such investor was acquiring the securities for such investor's own account for investment; and

(iv) the securities were issued with restrictive legends.

63

 
Item 3.
Defaults upon Senior Securities:

None.

Item 4.
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders:

By written consent dated January 13, 2005, stockholders owning more than a majority of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of the Company authorized and approved a Certificate of Amendment to our Certificate of Incorporation with a Special Meeting of Stockholders. The Certificate of Amendment was filed on February 24, 2005 and increased the number of shares of common stock the Company are authorized to issue from 200,000,000 shares to 600,000,000 shares.

Item 5.
Other Information:

None.

64


Item 6.
Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K:
 
(a) Exhibits:
 

Exhibit No.
   
Exhibit Description
   
Location
 
2-1
 
Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of Filed herewith December 24, 2003 by and among Global Business Resources, Inc., Global Infinium Merger Sub, Inc., Infinium Labs Corporation and Peter J. Goldstein
Incorporated by Reference to Exhibit 2-1 to Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 20, 2004
               
3-1
   
Certificate of Incorporation
   
Incorporated by Reference to Exhibit 3-0 to Form SB-2 (Registration No. 333-67990) filed with the SEC on August 20, 2001
 
   
3-2
   
Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation
   
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3-2 to the Company's Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003
 
               
3-3
   
Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation
   
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3-3 to the Company's Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003
 
               
3-4
   
By-laws
   
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3-4 to the Company's Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003
 
               
4-1
   
Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of January 22, 2004 between Infinium Labs, Inc. and SBI Brightline VI, LLC
   
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4-1 to Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 26, 2004
 
   
4-2
   
Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of January 22, 2004 between Infinium Labs, Inc. and Infinium Investment Partners, LLC
   
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4-2 to Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 26, 2004
 
               
4-3
   
Form of Subscription Agreement between Infinium Labs, Inc. and certain stockholders of Infinium Labs, Inc.
   
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4-3 to the Company's Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003
 
               
10-1
   
12% Secured Subordinated Debenture between the Company and Contare Ventures, LLC, dated February 23, 2004
   
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10-12 to the Form 10-QSB filed with the SEC on August 23, 2004
 
               
10-2
   
12% Secured Subordinated Debenture between the Company and Gary Kurfirst, dated February 23, 2004
   
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10-9 to the Form 10-QSB filed with the SEC on August 23, 2004
 
               
10-3
   
15% Secured Debenture between the Company and James Beshara, dated March 29, 2004
   
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10-4 to the Form 10-QSB filed with the SEC on August 23, 2004
 
               
10-4
   
15% Secured Debenture between the Company and Ronald Westman, dated April 7, 2004
   
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10-11 to the Form 10-QSB filed with the SEC on August 23, 2004
 
               
10-5
   
15% Secured Subordinated Debenture between the Company and James Beshara, dated May 3, 2004
   
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10-3 to the Form 10-QSB filed with the SEC on August 23, 2004
 
               
10-6
   
15% Secured Debenture between the Company and Ronald Westman, dated May 7, 2004
   
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10-1 to the Form 10-QSB filed with the SEC on August 23, 2004
 
 
 
65

 
               
10-7
   
Pledge Agreement between Robert F. Shambro in favor of Phoenix Capital Opportunity Fund, dated May 12, 2004
   
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10-6 to the Form 10-QSB filed with the SEC on August 23, 2004
 
               
10-8
   
Promissory Note between the Company and Sharon M. Beshara, dated May 18, 2004
   
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10-5 to the Form 10-QSB filed with the SEC on August 23, 2004
 
               
10-9
   
15% Secured Subordinated Debenture between the Company and SBI USA, LLC, dated May 28, 2004
   
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10-10 to the Form 10-QSB filed with the SEC on August 23, 2004
 
               
10-11
   
Amended and restated convertible secured promissory note
   
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit dated, June 16, 2004, between the Company and Phantom Investors, LLC 10-2 to the Form 10-QSB filed with the SEC on August 23, 2004
 
               
10-12
   
Commercial Promissory Note between the Company and Video Associates, LLC, dated June 2004
   
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10-8 to the Form 10-QSB filed with the SEC on August 23, 2004
 
               
10-13
   
Employee Stock Ownership
   
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit10-13 to the Form 10-QSB filed with the SEC on August 23, 2004
 
               
10-14
   
Promissory Note between the Company and Stephen A. Witzer, dated July 28, 2004
   
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10-14 to the Form SB-2/A filed with the SEC on February 14, 2005
 
               
10-15
   
10% Secured Promissory Note between the Company and Hazinu Ltd., dated October 20, 2004
   
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4-2 to Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 29, 2004
 
               
10-16
   
10% Secured Promissory Note between the Company and JM Investors, LLC, Fenmore Holdings, LLC, Viscount Investments Limited and Congregation Mishkan Sholom, dated October 27, 2004
   
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4-6 to Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 29, 2004
 
   
10-17
   
Securities Purchase Agreement between the Company and Hazinu Ltd., JM Investors, LLC, Fenmore Holdings, LLC, Viscount Investments Limited and Congregation Mishkan Sholom, dated December 13, 2004
   
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4-1 to Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 22, 2004
 
   
10-18
   
Registration Rights Agreement between the Company and Hazinu Ltd., JM Investors, LLC, Fenmore Holdings, LLC, Viscount Investments Limited and Congregation Mishkan Sholom, dated December 13, 2004
   
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4-2 to Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 22, 2004
 
   
10-19
   
8% Convertible Debenture between the Company and Hazinu Ltd., JM Investors, LLC, Fenmore Holdings, LLC, Viscount Investments Limited and Congregation Mishkan Sholom, dated December 13, 2004
   
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4-3 to Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 22, 2004
 
   
10-20
   
8% Convertible Debenture between the Company and accredited investors, dated December 23, 2004
   
Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 5, 2005
 
               
10-21
   
Employment agreement between the Company and Richard Skoba dated January 3, 2003
   
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10-21 to the Company's Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004
 
               
10-22
   
Pinnacle Marketing agreement to serve as manufacturing representatives
   
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10-22 to the Form SB-2/A filed with the SEC on February 14, 2005
 
               
10-23
   
Summit Marketing agreement to serve as manufacturing representatives
   
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10-23 to the Form SB-2/A filed with the SEC on February 14, 2005
 
               
10-24
   
Limelight Networks agreement to provide digital delivery network services
   
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10-24 to the Form SB-2/A filed with the SEC on February 14, 2005
 
 
 
66

 
               
10-25
   
Chicony agreement to manufacture system hardware
   
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10-25 to the Form SB-2/A filed with the SEC on February 14, 2005
 
     
       
10-26
   
Saitek agreement to manufacture system hardware
   
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10-26 to the Form SB-2/A filed with the SEC on February 14, 2005
 
     
       
10-27
   
BIOSTAR® Microtech International Corp. agreement for engineering, industrial design and manufacturing
   
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10-27 to the Form SB-2/A filed with the SEC on February 14, 2005
 
               
10-28
   
Teague agreement for engineering and industrial design
   
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit10-28 to the Form SB-2/A filed with the SEC on February 14, 2005
 
               
10-29
   
Employment agreement between the Company and Richard Skoba dated June 1, 2004
   
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10-29 to the Company's Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004
 
               
10-30
   
Employment agreement between the Company and Timothy M. Roberts dated September 17, 2004
   
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10-30 to the Company's Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004
 
               
10-31
   
Employment agreement between the Company and Kevin Bachus dated November 1, 2003
   
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10-31 to the Company's Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004
 
               
10-32
   
Employment agreement between the Company and Tyrol Graham dated January 15, 2004
   
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10-32 to the Company's Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004
 
               
10-33
   
Employment agreement between the Company and Andrew Schneider dated May 24, 2004
   
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10-33 to the Company's Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004
 
               
10-34
   
15% Promissory Note between the Company and Timothy M. Roberts, dated January 27, 2005
   
Filed herewith
 
     
       
10-35
   
17% Promissory Note between the Company and Terry Taylor, dated January 28, 2005
   
Filed herewith
 
               
10-36
   
15% Promissory Note between the Company and Fred Niedrich, dated January 31, 2005
   
Filed herewith
 
               
10-37
   
15% Promissory Note between the Company and Rob Shambro, dated January 31, 2005
   
Filed herewith
 
               
10-38
   
15% Promissory Note between the Company and Larry Bonet, dated February 3, 2005
   
Filed herewith
 
               
10-39
   
6% Promissory Note between the Company and Nite Capital LP, dated March 9, 2005
   
Filed herewith
 
     
       
10-40
   
17% Promissory Note between the Company and Ron Westman, dated March 21, 2005
   
Filed herewith
 
           
 
 
10-41
   
12% Promissory Note between the Company and Rob Shambro, dated April 7, 2005
   
Filed herewith
 
               
10-42
   
17% Promissory Note between the Company and Fred Niedrich, dated April 29, 2005
   
Filed herewith
 
               
31-1
   
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer
   
Filed herewith
 
               
32-1
   
Section 1350 Certification
   
Filed herewith
 

 
67

 
(b) Reports on Form 8-K:

Current Report on Form 8-K on January 20, 2004 regarding the change in control of the Company as a result of the Merger.

Current Report on Form 8-K on January 22, 2004 regarding Stock Purchase Agreement with each of SBI Brightline VI, LLC and Infinium Investment Partners, LLC.

Current Report on Form 8-K on March 22, 2004 and amended on November 9, 2004 amending Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 5, 2004, filed on January 20, 2004, to amend Item 7 to include the financial statements of the business acquired and the pro forma financial information required by Item 7 of Form 8-K.

Current Report on Form 8-K on September 24, 2004 regarding the Company moving the launch of its Phantom Game Service to 2005.

Current Report on Form 8-K on October 28, 2004 and amended on October 29, 2004 regarding Bridge Loan Agreement with Hazinu Ltd. and the Bridge Loan Agreement with and JM Investors, LLC, Fenmore Holdings, LLC, Viscount Investments Limited and Congregation Mishkan Sholom

Current Report on Form 8-K on November 9, 2004 and amended on May 11, 2005 regarding changes in Company’s Certifying Accountant..

Current Report on Form 8-K on December 22, 2004 regarding transaction pursuant to a Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 13, 2004,with several accredited investors pursuant to which those accredited investors lent an aggregate principal amount of $1,160,000 to the Company in exchange for (i) 8% convertible debentures Series 04-02 in that aggregate principal amount , and (ii) Class 2004-A (“Class A”) warrants to purchase 5,437,487 shares of common stock, Class 2004-B (“Class B”) warrants to purchase 5,437,487 shares of common stock and Class 2004-C (“Class C”) warrants to purchase 5,437,487 shares of common stock.

Current Report on Form 8-K on January 5, 2005 regarding transaction pursuant to a Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 23, 2004, with several accredited investors pursuant to which those accredited investors lent an aggregate principal amount of $1,000,000 to us in exchange for (i) 8% convertible debentures Series 04-03 in that aggregate principal amount, and (ii) Class 2004-A-2 warrants to purchase 4,687,485 shares of our common stock.

Current Report on Form 8-K on January 14, 2005 regarding a Conversion Agreement dated January 6, 2005 with Phoenix Capital Opportunity Fund, L.P., a holder of our 15% convertible secured promissory note, in which the parties agreed that the outstanding principal balance and all interest accrued and unpaid on such note in the aggregate amount of $721,875 be converted into an aggregate of 7,218,750 shares of our restricted common stock.

Current Report on Form 8-K on January 28, 2005 regarding issuing 12 % Non-Negotiable Promissory Notes on January 27, 2005 to Timothy Roberts, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Robert Shambro and Fred Niedrich in which the Lenders lent an aggregate principal amount of $500,000 to the Company in exchange for the Notes.

68


SIGNATURES
 
In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Dated: May 23, 2005
INFINIUM LABS, INC.

 
/s/ Timothy M. Roberts
By:

Timothy M. Roberts, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
and Acting Chief Financial Officer

 
69

 



















































































































































































Exhibit 31

CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Timothy M. Roberts, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of Infinium Labs, Inc. (the “small business issuer”), certify that:
 
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB, for the quarter ending March 31, 2005, of Infinium Labs, Inc.;
 
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
 
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of and for the periods presented in this quarterly report;
 
4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

 
(a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
 
(b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and
 
(c)
disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 
5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 
  (a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 
 
(b)
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial quarterly reporting.

/s/ Timothy M. Roberts
_______________________________
Timothy M. Roberts
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer
May 23, 2005


70

 

Exhibit 32

 
THE FOLLOWING CERTIFICATION ACCOMPANIES THE ISSUER’S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB AND IS NOT FILED, AS PROVIDED IN ITEM 601(b)(32)(ii) OF REGULATION S-B PROMULGATED BY THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION.
 
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
In connection with the quarterly report of Infinium Labs, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB (the “Report”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Timothy M. Roberts, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
/s/ Timothy M. Roberts
 
_________________________
Timothy M. Roberts
Chief Executive Officer and
Acting Chief Financial Officer
May 23, 2005
 
 
71