Table of Contents

As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 20, 2022

REGISTRATION NOS. 333-         and 333-         -01        

 

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 

 

FORM SF-1

REGISTRATION STATEMENT

UNDER

THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933

 

 

 

EVERGY MISSOURI WEST, INC.   EVERGY MISSOURI WEST STORM FUNDING I, LLC
(Exact name of registrant, sponsor and depositor as specified in its charter)   (Exact name of registrant and issuing entity as specified in its charter)
Delaware   Delaware

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

 

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

0001955722   0001955844
(Central Index Key Number)   (Central Index Key Number)
44-0541877   92-1105743

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification Number)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification Number)

1200 Main Street

Kansas City, Missouri 64105

(816) 556-2200

 

818 S. Kansas Avenue

Topeka, Kansas 66612

(785) 575-6300

(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including

area code, of depositor’s principal executive offices)

 

(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code,

of issuing entity’s principal executive offices)

 

 

Heather A. Humphrey

Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary

Evergy Missouri West, Inc.

1200 Main Street

Kansas City, Missouri 64105

(816) 556-2200

(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service)

 

 

With Copies to:

 

Michael F. Fitzpatrick, Jr., Esq.   Eric D. Tashman, Esq.
Adam R. O’Brian, Esq.   Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP
Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP   555 California Street
200 Park Avenue   San Francisco, California 94104
New York, New York 10166   (628) 231-6803
(212) 309-1000  

 

 

Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public:

As soon as practicable after the effective date of this Registration Statement.

 

 

If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act of 1933, please check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.  ☐

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.  ☐

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act of 1933, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.  ☐

The Registrants hereby amend this Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the Registrants shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this Registration Statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, or until this Registration Statement shall become effective on such date as the Securities and Exchange Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.

 

 

 

 


Table of Contents

The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. These securities may not be sold until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell nor does it seek an offer to buy these securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted.

SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED DECEMBER 20, 2022

PRELIMINARY PROSPECTUS

$                 Securitized Utility Tariff Bonds, Series 2023-A

Evergy Missouri West, Inc.

Sponsor, Depositor and Initial Servicer

Central Index Key Number: 0001955722

Evergy Missouri West Storm Funding I, LLC

Issuing Entity

Central Index Key Number: 0001955844

 

 

 

Tranche

 

Expected Weighted
Average Life (Years)

  

Principal

Amount

Offered

  

Scheduled
Final
Payment Date

  

Final Maturity
Date

  

Interest Rate

  

Initial Price to
Public (1)

  

Underwriting
Discounts and
Commissions

  

Proceeds to Issuing
Entity (Before
Expenses)

                      
                      

 

(1)

Interest on the securitized utility tariff bonds will accrue from                , 2023 and must be paid by the purchaser if the bonds are delivered after that date.

The total initial price to the public is $                . The total amount of the underwriting discounts and commissions is $                . The    total amount of proceeds to the issuing entity before deduction of expenses (estimated to be $                ) is $                . The distribution frequency is semi-annually. The first expected payment date is                 .

Investing in the Securitized Utility Tariff Bonds involves risks. Please read “Risk Factors” beginning on page 17 in this prospectus to read about factors you should consider before buying the securitized utility tariff bonds.

Evergy Missouri West, Inc., as “sponsor”, is offering $                 Securitized Utility Tariff Bonds, Series 2023-A, referred to herein as the “securitized utility tariff bonds” or “bonds”, in                  tranches to be issued by Evergy Missouri West Storm Funding I, LLC, as the “issuing entity”. Evergy Missouri West, Inc. is also the “seller, initial “servicer and “depositor with regard to the securitized utility tariff bonds. The securitized utility tariff bonds are senior secured obligations of the issuing entity supported by “securitized utility tariff property”, which includes the right to a special, irrevocable non-bypassable charge, known as “securitized utility tariff charges”, and paid by all existing or future retail customers receiving electrical service from the electrical corporation or its successors or assignees under commission-approved rate schedules, except for customers receiving electrical service under special contracts as of August 28, 2021, even if a retail customer elects to purchase electricity from an alternative electricity supplier following a fundamental change in regulation of public utilities in this state. The Securitization Law (as defined below) requires that securitized utility tariff charges be adjusted (or “trued-up”) at least annually, and the Missouri Public Service Commission (the “MPSC”) has authorized the securitized utility tariff charges to be adjusted more frequently to ensure the expected recovery of securitized utility tariff charge revenues sufficient to timely provide all scheduled payments of principal and interest on the securitized utility tariff bonds and related financing costs, as described further in this prospectus. Credit enhancement for the securitized utility tariff bonds will be provided by such “true-up” mechanisms as well as by accounts held under the indenture.

The securitized utility tariff bonds will be issued pursuant to Section 393.1700 of the Revised Statutes of Missouri (the “Securitization Law”), and an irrevocable financing order issued by the MPSC on November 17, 2022, which became effective on November 27, 2022, approving the issuance of the securitized utility tariff bonds (the “financing order”). The financing order is irrevocable and the MPSC shall neither reduce, impair, postpone, terminate, or otherwise adjust the securitized utility tariff charges authorized under a financing order, except for the true-up adjustments to the securitized utility tariff charges.

The securitized utility tariff bonds represent obligations only of the issuing entity, Evergy Missouri West Storm Funding I, LLC, and do not represent obligations of the sponsor or any of its affiliates other than the issuing entity. The securitized utility tariff bonds are secured by the collateral, consisting principally of the securitized utility tariff property acquired pursuant to the sale agreement and funds on deposit in the collection account for the securitized utility tariff bonds and related subaccounts. Please read “Security for the Securitized Utility Tariff Bonds” in this prospectus. Neither the State of Missouri nor its political subdivisions are liable for the securitized utility tariff bonds, and the bonds are not a debt or general obligation of the State of Missouri or any of its political subdivisions, agencies or instrumentalities, nor are they indebtedness of the State of Missouri or any agency or political subdivision. The securitized utility tariff bonds do not, directly, indirectly, or contingently, obligate the State of Missouri or any agency, political subdivision, or instrumentality of the State of Missouri to levy any tax or make any appropriation for payment of the securitized utility tariff bonds, other than in their capacity as consumers of electricity.

Interest will accrue on the securitized utility tariff bonds from the date of issuance. The securitized utility tariff bonds are scheduled to pay principal and interest semi-annually on                 and                  of each year. The first scheduled payment date is                 . On each payment date, each securitized utility tariff bond will be entitled to payment of principal, sequentially, but only to the extent funds are available in the collection account after payment of certain fees and expenses and after payment of interest.

NEITHER THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION NOR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION HAS APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED OF THESE SECURITIES OR DETERMINED IF THIS PROSPECTUS IS TRUTHFUL OR COMPLETE. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE.

The underwriters expect to deliver the securitized utility tariff bonds through the book-entry facilities of The Depository Trust Company for the accounts of its participants, including Clearstream Banking, S.A. and Euroclear Bank SA/NV, as operator of the Euroclear System, against payment in immediately available funds on or about                 , 2023.

 

 

Joint Book-Running Managers

The date of this prospectus is                 , 2023

 


Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

ABOUT THIS PROSPECTUS

     1  

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

     2  

PROSPECTUS SUMMARY OF TERMS

     3  

SUMMARY OF RISK FACTORS

     15  

RISK FACTORS

     17  

RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH POTENTIAL JUDICIAL, LEGISLATIVE OR REGULATORY ACTIONS

     18  

SERVICING FORECASTING RISKS

     21  

RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH THE UNUSUAL NATURE OF THE SECURITIZED UTILITY TARIFF PROPERTY

     24  

NATURAL DISASTER-RELATED RISKS

     25  

RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH POTENTIAL BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS OF THE SELLER OR THE SERVICER

     26  

OTHER RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH AN INVESTMENT IN THE SECURITIZED UTILITY TARIFF BONDS

     30  

REVIEW OF SECURITIZED UTILITY TARIFF PROPERTY

     35  

THE SECURITIZED UTILITY TARIFF PROPERTY AND THE SECURITIZATION LAW

     39  

EVERGY MISSOURI WEST’S FINANCING ORDER

     44  

THE DEPOSITOR, SELLER, INITIAL SERVICER AND SPONSOR

     47  

EVERGY MISSOURI WEST STORM FUNDING I, LLC, THE ISSUING ENTITY

     53  

DESCRIPTION OF THE SECURITIZED UTILITY TARIFF BONDS

     56  

EXPECTED SINKING FUND SCHEDULE

     60  

EXPECTED AMORTIZATION TABLE

     61  

THE TRUSTEE

     80  

SECURITY FOR THE SECURITIZED UTILITY TARIFF BONDS

     82  

WEIGHTED AVERAGE LIFE AND YIELD CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE SECURITIZED UTILITY TARIFF BONDS

     87  

THE SALE AGREEMENT

     89  

THE SERVICING AGREEMENT

     98  

HOW A BANKRUPTCY MAY AFFECT YOUR INVESTMENT

     107  

USE OF PROCEEDS

     111  

PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION

     112  

AFFILIATIONS AND CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

     113  

MATERIAL U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES

     114  

STATE AND OTHER TAX CONSEQUENCES

     118  

ERISA CONSIDERATIONS

     119  

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

     123  

RATINGS FOR THE SECURITIZED UTILITY TARIFF BONDS

     124  

WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

     125  

INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE

     126  

INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940 AND VOLCKER RULE MATTERS

     127  

RISK RETENTION

     128  

LEGAL MATTERS

     129  

OFFERING RESTRICTIONS IN CERTAIN JURISDICTIONS

     130  

GLOSSARY OF DEFINED TERMS

     133  

 


Table of Contents

ABOUT THIS PROSPECTUS

This prospectus is part of a registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or “SEC”. This prospectus provides information about the issuing entity, the securitized utility tariff bonds and Evergy Missouri West Inc., or “Evergy Missouri West”, the depositor, sponsor and initial servicer. This prospectus describes the terms of the securitized utility tariff bonds offered hereby. You should carefully review this prospectus, any free writing prospectus the issuing entity files with the SEC, and the information, if any, contained in the documents referenced in this prospectus under the heading “Where You Can Find More Information”.

References in this prospectus to the term “we”, “us”, or the “issuing entity mean Evergy Missouri West Storm Funding I, LLC, the entity which will issue the securitized utility tariff bonds. References to the “securitized utility tariff bonds”, unless the context otherwise requires, mean the securitized utility tariff bonds offered pursuant to this prospectus. References to “Evergy Missouri West”, the “seller”, the “depositor or the “sponsor mean Evergy Missouri West, Inc. References to the “bondholders or the “holders refer to the registered holders of the securitized utility tariff bonds. References to the “securitized utility tariff property mean the securitized utility tariff property sold to the issuing entity by Evergy Missouri West pursuant to the sale agreement and pledged to the payment of the securitized utility tariff bonds. References to the “servicer refer to Evergy Missouri West and any successor servicer under the servicing agreement referred to in this prospectus. References to the “MPSC refer to the Missouri Public Service Commission. References to the “Securitization Law refer to Section 393.1700 of the Revised Statutes of Missouri. Unless the context otherwise requires, references to a “financing order are to the irrevocable financing order issued by the MPSC as File No. EF-2022-0155, on November 17, 2022, which became effective on November 27, 2022. Unless the context otherwise requires, the term “customer means “customer” within the meaning of Securitization Law. Under the Securitization Law, the securitized utility tariff charge will be paid by all existing or future retail customers receiving electrical service from the Evergy Missouri West or its successors or assignees under MPSC-approved rate schedules, except for customers receiving electrical service under special contracts as of August 28, 2021, even if a retail customer elects to purchase electricity from an alternative electricity supplier following a fundamental change in regulation of public utilities in the State of Missouri. You can find a glossary of some of the other defined terms used in this prospectus on page 133 of this prospectus.

This prospectus includes cross-references to sections in this prospectus where you can find further related discussions. You can also find key topics in the preceding pages. Check the table of contents to locate these sections.

You should rely only on the information contained or incorporated by reference in this prospectus and in any free writing prospectus from us or the underwriters specifying the terms of this offering. Neither the issuing entity nor any underwriter, agent, dealer, salesperson, the MPSC or Evergy Missouri West has authorized anyone else to provide you with any different information. If anyone provides you with different or inconsistent information, you should not rely on it. The securitized utility tariff bonds are not being offered in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted. The information in this prospectus and any free writing prospectus is current only as of the date of this prospectus.

 

1


Table of Contents

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

This prospectus and the documents incorporated by reference in this prospectus contain forward-looking statements that are necessarily subject to various risks and uncertainties. These statements reflect management’s judgment and opinions that are based on current estimates, expectations and projections about future events and assumptions regarding these events and management’s knowledge of facts as of the date of this prospectus. These forward-looking statements relate to, among other matters, estimated losses, including penalties and fines, associated with various investigations and proceedings; forecasts of capital expenditures; forecasts of expense reduction; estimates and assumptions used in critical accounting estimates, including those relating to insurance receivables, regulatory assets and liabilities, environmental remediation, litigation, third-party claims, and other liabilities; and the level of future equity or debt issuances. Forward-looking statements are often accompanied by forward-looking words such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “expects,” “estimates,” “forecasts,” “should,” “could,” “may,” “seeks,” “intends,” “proposed,” “projects,” “planned,” “target,” “outlook,” “remain confident,” “goal,” “will” or other words of similar meaning. Forward-looking statements involve risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking information include, but are not limited to:

 

   

the impact of federal, state and local political, legislative, judicial and regulatory actions or developments, including deregulation, re-regulation, securitization and restructuring of the electrical corporation industry and changes in, or changes in application of, laws or regulations applicable to various aspects of Evergy Missouri West’s business;

 

   

the accuracy of the servicer’s estimates of market demand and prices for energy;

 

   

the accuracy of the servicer’s estimates of industrial, commercial and residential growth;

 

   

the accuracy of the servicer’s forecast of electrical consumption or the payment of securitized utility tariff charges;

 

   

changes in the energy trading markets in which Evergy Missouri West participates, including retroactive repricing of transactions by regional transmission organizations (“RTO”) and independent system operators;

 

   

changes in market demand and demographic patterns;

 

   

the impact of climate change, including increased frequency and severity of significant weather events and the extent to which counterparties are willing to do business with, finance the operations of or purchase energy from Evergy Missouri West due to the fact that Evergy Missouri West operates coal-fired generation; prices and availability of electricity in wholesale markets which may impact Evergy Missouri West’s ability to supply electricity to customers or Evergy Missouri West’s ability to service the securitized utility tariff property;

 

   

the impact of the Coronavirus (“COVID-19”) pandemic on, among other things, sales, results of operations, financial condition, liquidity and cash flows, and also on operational issues, such as supply chain issues and the availability and ability of Evergy Missouri West’s employees and suppliers to perform the functions that are necessary to operate Evergy Missouri West;

 

   

the operating performance of Evergy Missouri West’s facilities and the facilities of third party suppliers of electric energy; and

 

   

other factors discussed in this prospectus.

You should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Each forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date of the particular statement, and the issuing entity will undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement, including unanticipated events, after the date on which such statement is made, except as required by law. New factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible for management to predict all of such factors, nor can it assess the impact of each such factor on the business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement.

 

2


Table of Contents

PROSPECTUS SUMMARY OF TERMS

The following section is only a summary of selected information and does not provide you with all the information you will need to make your investment decision. There is more detailed information in this prospectus. To understand all of the terms of the offering of the securitized utility tariff bonds, carefully read this entire prospectus. You should carefully consider the Risk Factors beginning on page 17 of this prospectus before you invest in the securitized utility tariff bonds.

 

Securities Offered:    $                         Securitized Utility Tariff Bonds, Series 2023-A, scheduled to pay principal semi-annually in accordance with the expected amortization schedule in this prospectus.
  

Tranche

  

Principal

Amount*

     
     
     
     
   *     Principal amounts are approximate and subject to change
Issuing Entity and Capital Structure:   

The issuing entity is a special purpose Delaware limited liability company. Evergy Missouri West is our sole member and owns all of our equity interests. The issuing entity has no commercial operations. The issuing entity was formed solely to purchase, own and administer securitized utility tariff property, issue securitized utility tariff bonds (including the securitized utility tariff bonds) secured by securitized utility tariff property and perform activities incidental thereto and our organizational documents prohibit us from engaging in any other activity except as specifically authorized by the financing order. The securitized utility tariff bonds are the only series of securitized utility tariff bonds which the issuing entity will issue. Please read “Evergy Missouri West Storm Funding I, The Issuing Entity” in this prospectus.

 

The issuing entity will be capitalized with an upfront cash deposit by Evergy Missouri West of 0.50% of the Securitized Utility Tariff Bonds, Series 2023-A’s initial aggregate principal amount issued (to be held in the capital subaccount to secure the securitized utility tariff bonds) and will have an excess funds subaccount to retain, until the next payment date, any amounts collected and remaining after all scheduled payments due on such payment date for the securitized utility tariff bonds have been made.

Issuing Entity’s Address and Telephone Number:   

818 S. Kansas Avenue
Topeka, Kansas 66612

(785) 575-6300

The Depositor, Sponsor, Seller and Initial Servicer:   

Evergy Missouri West, a Delaware corporation incorporated in 1986 and headquartered in Kansas City, Missouri, is an integrated, regulated electrical corporation engaged in the generation, transmission, distribution and sale of electricity in western Missouri, including the suburban Kansas City metropolitan area, the city of St. Joseph and surrounding counties. We are regulated by the MPSC and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (the “FERC”).

 

Evergy Missouri West is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Evergy, Inc. (“Evergy”).

 

 

3


Table of Contents
  

Evergy also owns Evergy Metro, Inc. (“Evergy Metro”) and Evergy Kansas Central, Inc. (“Evergy Kansas Central”), both integrated regulated electrical corporations. Each of Evergy Missouri West, Evergy, Evergy Metro and Evergy Kansas Central conducts business using the name Evergy. Evergy Missouri West provides electricity to approximately 338,500 customers in the State of Missouri. As of December 31, 2021, our customer base included approximately 297,200 residences, 40,800 commercial firms and 500 industrials, municipalities and other electric utilities.

 

Evergy Missouri West, acting as the initial servicer, and any successor servicer, referred to in this prospectus as the servicer, will service the securitized utility tariff property under a servicing agreement with the issuing entity. Please read “The Depositor, Seller, Initial Servicer and Sponsor” and “The Servicing Agreement” in this prospectus

Evergy Missouri West’s Address and Telephone Number:    1200 Main Street
Kansas City, Missouri 64105
(816) 556-2200
Trustee:    The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, National Association, a national banking association, will act as trustee under a new indenture to be entered into pursuant to which the securitized utility tariff bonds will be issued (the “indenture”). Please read “The Trustee” in this prospectus for a description of the trustee’s duties and responsibilities under the indenture.
Purpose of Transaction:    This issuance of Bonds will enable Evergy Missouri West to finance all qualified extraordinary costs that it incurred as a result of the North American storm of mid-February 2021 known as Winter Storm Uri (“Winter Storm Uri”) and which are eligible for recovery under the Securitization Law. Please read “The Securitized Utility Tariff Property and the Securitization Law” and “Evergy Missouri West’s Financing Order” in this prospectus.
Transaction Overview:    The Securitization Law allows the recovery of qualified extraordinary costs by certain electrical corporations through the issuance of securitized utility tariff bonds. The Securitization Law establishes a process to obtain a financing order under which the MPSC is allowed to authorize an electrical corporation (or its successors) to impose, bill, charge, collect and receive from its customers a nonbypassable, securitized utility tariff charge to recover qualified extraordinary costs. The amount and terms for collections of these securitized utility tariff charges are governed by the financing order issued to an electrical corporation by the MPSC. The Securitization Law permits an electrical corporation to transfer its rights and interests under a financing order, including the right to impose, collect and receive securitized utility tariff charges, to a special purpose entity formed by the electrical corporation to issue securitized utility tariff bonds secured by the right to receive revenues arising from the securitized utility tariff charges. The electrical corporation’s right to impose, bill, charge, collect and receive the securitized utility tariff charges, and all revenues, collections, claims, rights to payments, payments, money, or proceeds arising from the rights and interests specified in the financing order upon transfer to the issuing entity, constitute securitized utility tariff property.

 

4


Table of Contents
  

In February 2021, Winter Storm Uri caused unreasonably cold temperatures which led to rolling electrical blackouts and extreme natural gas price spikes. Winter Storm Uri presented an event that was unpredictable and unexpected. Utility service and underlying gas markets throughout the region experienced a profound crisis arising from the unusually cold and unusually persistent winter weather, resulting in increased demand for electric power on Evergy Missouri West’s footprint and increased demand for natural gas in the region. The dramatic escalation in demand caused gas prices to rise on the spot and daily index accordingly, placing temporary but severe constraints on Evergy Missouri West’s ability to obtain adequate natural gas fuel supply to satisfy customer needs. As a result, Evergy Missouri West incurred escalated purchased power costs.

 

On November 17, 2022, the MPSC issued a financing order to Evergy Missouri West to enable Evergy Missouri West to recover $307,811,246 of qualified extraordinary costs plus upfront financing costs relating to Winter Storm Uri. References in this prospectus to the “financing order,” unless the context indicates otherwise, mean the financing order issued by the MPSC on November 17, 2022. Please read “Evergy Missouri West’s Financing Order” in this prospectus for a more comprehensive description of the financing order and related proceedings and for a description of the qualified extraordinary costs authorized in the financing order, which the depositor refers to in this prospectus as “securitized utility tariff costs.”

 

The primary transactions underlying the offering of the securitized utility tariff bonds are as follows:

 

•  Evergy Missouri West will sell securitized utility tariff property to the issuing entity in exchange for the net proceeds from the sale of the securitized utility tariff bonds;

 

•  the issuing entity will sell the securitized utility tariff bonds, which will be secured primarily by the securitized utility tariff property, to the underwriters; and

 

•  Evergy Missouri West will act as the initial servicer of the securitized utility tariff property.

 

The securitized utility tariff bonds are not obligations of the trustee, the issuing entity’s managers, Evergy Missouri West, Evergy or any of their respective affiliates other than the issuing entity. Neither the State of Missouri nor its political subdivisions are liable on the securitized utility tariff bonds, and the bonds are not a debt or general obligation of the State of Missouri or any of its political subdivisions, agencies or instrumentalities, nor are they special obligations or indebtedness of the State of Missouri or any agency or political subdivision. The securitized utility tariff bonds do not, directly, indirectly, or contingently, obligate the State of Missouri or any agency, political subdivision, or instrumentality of the State of Missouri to levy any tax or make any appropriation for payment of the securitized utility tariff bonds, other than in their capacity as consumers of electricity.

 

5


Table of Contents
Diagram of Transaction:    The following diagram represents a general summary of the structure of the securitized utility tariff bonds offered, flow of funds and relationships among the parties:
   LOGO
Flow of Funds:    The following chart represents a general summary of the flow of funds:
   LOGO
Securitized Utility Tariff Property, Securitized Utility Tariff Charges and the True-Up Mechanism:    In general terms, all of the rights and interests of Evergy Missouri West under the financing order that are transferred to the issuing entity pursuant to the sale agreement are referred to in this prospectus as the “securitized utility tariff property.” The securitized utility tariff property consists of all of Evergy Missouri West’s rights and interests established under the financing order and further identified in the issuance advice letter transferred to the issuing entity in connection with the issuance of the securitized utility tariff bonds, including (i) the right and interests of Evergy Missouri West under the financing order, including the right to impose, bill, charge, collect and receive the securitized utility tariff charges authorized under the financing order, including all rights to obtain adjustments of such charges as authorized by provisions of the Securitization Law and the financing order, and (ii) all revenues, collections, claims, payments, rights to payment, moneys, or proceeds of or arising from rights or interests specified in the financing order, regardless of whether such revenues, collections, claims, rights to payment, payments, money, or proceeds are imposed, billed, received, collected, or maintained together with or commingled with other revenues, collections, rights to payment, payments, money, or proceeds. Securitized utility tariff property is a present intangible property right created by the Securitization Law and the financing order and is protected by the State Pledge in the Securitization Law described below.

 

6


Table of Contents
  

Non-bypassable means that the issuing entity will be entitled to collect securitized utility tariff charges from all existing or future retail customers receiving electrical service from Evergy Missouri West or its successor or assignees and located in Evergy Missouri West’s service area as such service area existed on the date of the financing order (except for customers receiving electrical service under special contracts on August 28, 2021 (“Exempted Customers”)) even if a retail customer elects to purchase electricity from an alternative electric supplier following a fundamental change in regulation of public utilities in the State of Missouri. Therefore, in general, customers can only avoid paying securitized utility tariff charges if they move out of Evergy Missouri West’s service territory or if they are Exempted Customers or terminate all service. Please read “The Securitized Utility Tariff Property and the Securitization Law— The Financing Order and the Securitized Utility Tariff Property—Exemptions from Securitized Utility Tariff Charges” and “Evergy Missouri West’s Financing Order—Securitized Utility Tariff Charges—The Financing Order Approves the Methodology used to Calculate the Securitized Utility Tariff Charges” in this prospectus.

 

The financing order approves the methodology by which the securitized utility tariff charges will be calculated and adjusted from time to time by the servicer pursuant to the issuance advice letter and true-up advice letters submitted to the MPSC as described below. Pursuant to the financing order, except for Exempted Customers, the securitized utility tariff charge will be assessed to all customers at an equal cent per kWh charge that is adjusted for line losses determined for each voltage level class. Please read “Evergy Missouri Wests Financing Order—Securitized Utility Tariff Charges—The Financing Order Approves the Methodology used to Calculate the Fixed Recovery Charges” in this prospectus.

 

The true-up is designed to (a) correct any under collections or overcollections that may have occurred and otherwise ensure that the SPE receives remittances from securitized utility tariff charges that are required to satisfy the total securitized revenue requirement, including without limitation any overcollections or under collections caused by defaults, during the time since the last true-up; and (b) ensure the billing of securitized utility tariff charges necessary to generate the collection of amounts sufficient to timely provide all payments of scheduled principal and interest (or deposits to sinking funds in respect of principal and interest) and any other amounts due in connection with the securitized utility tariff bonds (including ongoing financing costs and amounts required to be deposited in or allocated to any collection account or subaccount) during the period for which such adjusted securitized utility tariff charges are to be in effect.

 

The servicer may make a true-up adjustment to adjust the securitized utility tariff charges to ensure the recovery of revenues are sufficient to provide for the timely payment of the periodic payment requirement. Standard true-up adjustments will be made on an annual basis (and beginning 12 months prior to the scheduled final payment date for the latest maturing tranche, on a quarterly basis) and, if necessary if the servicer forecasts undercollections, on, a semi-annual and an interim basis.

 

There is no “cap” on the level of securitized utility tariff charges that may be imposed on customers in order to timely pay scheduled principal and interest on the securitized utility tariff bonds and related financing costs.

 

7


Table of Contents
The Collateral:   

The securitized utility tariff bonds are secured only by the collateral. The principal asset securing the securitized utility tariff bonds will be the securitized utility tariff property acquired by the issuing entity pursuant to the sale agreement, which is a present property right created under the Securitization Law by the financing order issued by the MPSC. The collateral also includes:

 

•  the issuing entity’s rights under the sale agreement pursuant to which we will acquire the securitized utility tariff property;

 

•  the issuing entity’s rights under the financing order, including its rights under the true-up mechanism;

 

•  the issuing entity’s rights under the servicing agreement, intercreditor or collection agreements executed in connection with the servicing agreement;

 

•  the collection account for the securitized utility tariff bonds and all related subaccounts;

 

•  all of the issuing entity’s other property related to the securitized utility tariff bonds, other than any cash released to Evergy Missouri West by the trustee on any payment date representing a return of capital on its capital contribution;

 

•  all present and future claims, demands, causes and choses in action in respect of any or all of the foregoing; and

 

•  all payments on or under, and all proceeds in respect of any or all of, the foregoing.

 

The subaccounts consist of a capital subaccount, which will be funded at closing in the amount of 0.50% of the initial aggregate principal amount of the securitized utility tariff bonds, a general subaccount, into which the servicer will deposit all securitized utility tariff charge collections, and an excess funds subaccount, into which the issuing entity will transfer any amounts collected and remaining on a payment date after all payments to bondholders and other parties have been made. Amounts on deposit in each of these subaccounts will be available to make payments on the securitized utility tariff bonds on each payment date. For a description of the securitized utility tariff property, please read “The Securitized Utility Tariff Property and the Securitization Law” in this prospectus.

State Pledge:    Under the Securitization Law, the State of Missouri and its agencies, including the MPSC, pledge and agree with holders, the owners of the securitized utility tariff property, and other financing parties that the state and its agencies will not: (a) alter the provisions of the Securitization Law, which authorize the MPSC to create an irrevocable contract right or chose in action by the issuance of a financing order, to create securitized utility tariff property, and make the securitized utility tariff charges imposed by a financing order irrevocable, binding, or nonbypassable charges for all existing and future retail customers of Evergy Missouri West or its successors or assignees except for Exempted Customers; (b) take or permit any action that impairs or would impair the value of securitized utility tariff property or the security for the bonds or revises the securitized utility tariff costs for which recovery is authorized under the financing order; (c) in any way impair the rights and remedies of the holders, assignees, and other financing parties; or (d) except for changes made pursuant to the true-up adjustment, reduce, alter, or impair securitized utility tariff charges

 

8


Table of Contents
   that are to be imposed, billed, charged, collected, and remitted for the benefit of the holders, any assignee, and any other financing parties until any and all principal, interest, premium, financing costs and other fees, expenses, or charges incurred, and any contracts to be performed, in connection with the bonds have been paid and performed in full (collectively, the “State Pledge”). The State Pledge does not preclude limitation or alteration if full compensation is made by law for the full protection of the securitized utility tariff charges collected pursuant to a financing order and of the holders and any assignee or financing party entering into a contract with Evergy Missouri West.
Initial Securitized Utility Tariff Charge as a Percentage of Customer’s Bill:    The initial securitized utility tariff charge for the securitized utility tariff bonds offered hereby is expected to represent approximately         % of the total electric bill, as of             , received by a             kWh residential customer of Evergy Missouri West.
Payment Dates:    Semi-annually, on             and             , and on the scheduled final payment date or final maturity date for each tranche. The first scheduled payment date is                     .
Interest Rates:    Interest is due on each payment date. Interest will accrue with respect to each tranche of securitized utility tariff bonds on a 30/360 basis at the interest rate specified for such tranche in the table below:
   Tranche                                                                  Interest Rate
  
  
  
Principal Payments and Record Dates and Payment Sources:   

If any payment date is not a business day, payments scheduled to be made on such date may be made on the next succeeding business day and no interest shall accrue upon such payment during the intervening period.

 

The issuing entity will pay interest on each tranche of securitized utility tariff bonds before the issuing entity will pay the principal of each tranche of securitized utility tariff bonds. Please read “Description of the Securitized Utility Tariff Bonds—Principal Payments” in this prospectus. If there is a shortfall in the amounts available in the collection account to make interest payments, the trustee will distribute interest pro rata to each tranche of securitized utility tariff bonds based on the amount of interest payable on each outstanding tranche.

 

The issuing entity will be scheduled to make payments of principal on each payment date and sequentially in accordance with the expected sinking fund schedule included in this prospectus.

 

Principal for each tranche is due upon the final maturity date for that tranche. Failure to pay the entire outstanding principal amount of a tranche by the final maturity date for such tranche will result in an event of default.

 

Failure to pay a scheduled principal payment on any payment date or the entire outstanding amount of the securitized utility tariff bonds of any tranche by the scheduled final payment date will not result in a default with respect to that tranche. The failure to pay the entire outstanding principal balance of the securitized utility tariff bonds of any tranche will result in a default only if such payment has not been made by the final maturity date for the tranche.

 

9


Table of Contents
   If there is a shortfall in the amounts available to make principal payments on the securitized utility tariff bonds that are due and payable, including upon an acceleration following an event of default, the trustee will distribute principal from the collection account pro rata to each tranche of securitized utility tariff bonds based on the principal amount then due and payable on the payment date; and if there is a shortfall in the remaining amounts available to make principal payments on the securitized utility tariff bonds that are scheduled to be paid, the trustee will distribute principal from the collection account pro rata to each tranche of securitized utility tariff bonds based on the principal amount then scheduled to be paid on the payment date.
Weighted Average Life:    Tranche   

Expected Weighted

Average Life (years)

     
     
Scheduled Final Payment Date and Final Maturity Date:    The scheduled final payment date and final maturity date for each tranche of securitized utility tariff bonds will be as set forth in the table below:
   Tranche   

Scheduled Final

Payment Date

   Final Maturity Date
        
        
Optional Redemption:    None. Non-call for the life of the securitized utility tariff bonds.
Mandatory Redemption:    None. The issuing entity is not required to redeem the securitized utility tariff bonds at any time prior to maturity.
Priority of Payments:   

On each payment date for the securitized utility tariff bonds (or any other date as directed by the servicer with respect to ongoing financing costs in clause (4) below, payable prior to the next payment date), the trustee will, with respect to the securitized utility tariff bonds, pay or allocate, solely at the written direction of the servicer, all amounts on deposit in the general subaccount of the collection account (including investment earnings thereon) in the following order of priority:

 

1.  amounts owed by the issuing entity to the trustee, the trustee’s fees, expenses and any outstanding indemnity amounts not to exceed $             per annum (the “Trustee Cap”); provided, however, that the Trustee Cap shall be disregarded and inapplicable upon the acceleration of the securitized utility tariff bonds following the occurrence of an event of default;

 

2.  the servicing fee and any unpaid servicing fees from prior payment dates to the servicer;

 

3.  the administration fee and the fees owed to the issuing entity’s independent manager;

 

10


Table of Contents
  

 

4.  all of the issuing entity’s other ordinary periodic ongoing financing costs relating to the securitized utility tariff bonds, such as accounting and audit fees, rating agency fees, legal fees and certain reimbursable costs of the administrator under the administration agreement and of the servicer under the servicing agreement;

 

5.  interest then due on the securitized utility tariff bonds, including any past-due interest;

 

6.  principal then due and payable on the securitized utility tariff bonds as a result of an event of default or on the final maturity date for the securitized utility tariff bonds;

 

7.  scheduled principal payments of securitized utility tariff bonds according to its expected sinking fund schedule, together with any overdue scheduled principal payments, paid pro rata among the securitized utility tariff bonds if there is a deficiency;

 

8.  any remaining unpaid fees, expenses and indemnity amounts owed to the trustee;

 

9.  any other unpaid ongoing financing costs relating to the securitized utility tariff bonds and any remaining amounts owed pursuant to the basic documents;

 

10.  replenishment of any amounts drawn from the capital subaccount;

 

11.  provided that no event of default has occurred and is continuing, release to Evergy Missouri West an amount representing a return on capital of its capital contribution calculated at the weighted average cost of capital authorized from time to time by the MPSC in Evergy Missouri West’s rate proceedings plus applicable taxes;

 

12.  the remainder, if any, to the excess funds subaccount for distribution on subsequent payment dates; and

 

13.  after principal of and premium, if any, and interest on all securitized utility tariff bonds and all of the other foregoing amounts have been paid in full, the balance (including all amounts then held in the applicable capital subaccount and the applicable excess funds subaccount), if any, shall be paid to Evergy Missouri West free and clear from the lien of the indenture and the series supplement and credited to customers through normal ratemaking processes.

 

The annual servicing fee for the securitized utility tariff bonds in clause (2) above payable to Evergy Missouri West while it is acting as servicer shall be $             (0.05% of the initial aggregate principal amount of the securitized utility tariff bonds) per annum, plus out-of-pocket expenses. The annual servicing fee for the securitized utility tariff bonds payable to any other servicer not affiliated with Evergy Missouri West must not at any time exceed 0.60% of the original principal amount of the securitized utility tariff bonds unless such higher rate is approved by the MPSC and the indenture trustee and subject to the rating agency condition. The annual administration fee in clause (3) above will be $50,000 per annum. Please read “Evergy Missouri West’s Financing Order—Issuance Advice Letter” and “Security for the Securitized Utility Tariff Bonds—How Funds in the Collection Account will be Allocated” in this prospectus.

 

11


Table of Contents
Issuance of Additional Securitized Utility Tariff Bonds:   

In addition, Evergy Missouri West may, from time to time, seek approval from the MPSC to issue securities similar to the securitized utility tariff bonds secured by non-bypassable charges similar to the securitized utility tariff charges to recover costs that are eligible to be financed under the Securitization Law or other legislation similar to the Securitization Law, and have been authorized by the MPSC. Such similar securitized utility tariff bonds are referred to as “additional securitized utility tariff bonds.”

 

Any additional securitized utility tariff bonds would be secured by separate property created by a separate financing order or orders. Evergy Missouri West has covenanted in the sale agreement that the satisfaction of the rating agency condition and the execution of a joinder to the intercreditor agreement is a condition precedent to the sale of property consisting of non-bypassable charges payable by customers comparable to the securitized utility tariff property sold by Evergy Missouri West pursuant to the sale agreement. Please read “Risk Factors—Other Risks Associated with an Investment in the Securitized Utility Tariff Bonds—Evergy Missouri West has caused, and may cause, the issuance of additional securitized utility tariff bonds secured by additional securitized utility tariff property that includes a non-bypassable charge on customers, which may cause a delay in the payment of the securitized utility tariff bonds and potential conflicts of interest among bondholders”, “Security for the Securitized Utility Tariff Bonds—Intercreditor Agreement” and Sale Agreement—Covenants of the Seller” in this prospectus.

 

The financing order requires that, in the event a customer does not pay in full all amounts owed under any bill including securitized utility tariff charges, any resulting shortfalls in securitized utility tariff charges will first be apportioned ratably between the securitized utility tariff charges and other fees (excluding any late fees), and second, any remaining portion of the payment must be allocated to late fees. Please read “The Servicing Agreement—Remittances to Collection Account” in this prospectus.

Credit Enhancement:   

Credit enhancement for the securitized utility tariff bonds, which is intended to protect you against losses or delays in scheduled payments on the securitized utility tariff bonds, will be as follows:

 

•  The MPSC will approve adjustments to the securitized utility tariff charges, but only upon petition of the servicer, to make up for any shortfall, due to any reason, or reduce any excess in collected securitized utility tariff charges. The issuing entity will sometimes refer to these adjustments as the “true-up adjustments or the “true-up mechanism.” These adjustments will be made annually, and if determined necessary by the servicer, semi-annually and more frequently and if there are securitized utility tariff bonds outstanding following the scheduled final payment date of the latest maturing tranche of the securitized utility tariff bonds, quarterly, to ensure the expected recovery of amounts sufficient to timely provide all payments of debt service and other required amounts and charges in connection with the securitized utility tariff bonds. Please read “Evergy Missouri West’s Financing Order—Securitized Utility Tariff Charges” in this prospectus.

 

•  Collection Account—Under the indenture, the trustee will hold a collection account for the securitized utility tariff bonds, divided into various subaccounts. The primary subaccounts for credit enhancement purposes are:

 

•  the general subaccount—the trustee will deposit into the general subaccount all securitized utility tariff charge collections remitted to it by the servicer;

 

12


Table of Contents
  

•  the capital subaccount—Evergy Missouri West will deposit an amount equal to 0.50% of the securitized utility tariff bonds principal amount issued into the capital subaccount on the date of issuance of the securitized utility tariff bonds; and

 

•  the excess funds subaccount—any excess amount of collected securitized utility tariff charges and investment earnings will be held in the excess funds subaccount.

Reports to Bondholders:    Pursuant to the indenture, the trustee will make available on its website (currently located at https://gctinvestorreporting.bnymellon.com) to the holders of record of the securitized utility tariff bonds regular reports prepared by the servicer containing information concerning, among other things, the issuing entity and the collateral. Unless and until the securitized utility tariff bonds are issued in definitive certificated form, the reports will be provided to The Depository Trust Company. The reports will be available to beneficial owners of the securitized utility tariff bonds upon written request to the trustee or the servicer. These reports will not be examined and reported upon by an independent public accountant. In addition, no independent public accountant will provide an opinion thereon. Please read “Description of the Securitized Utility Tariff Bonds—Reports to Bondholders” in this prospectus.
Servicing Compensation:    The issuing entity will pay the servicer on each payment date the servicing fee with respect to the securitized utility tariff bonds. As long as Evergy Missouri West or any affiliated entity acts as servicer, this fee will be 0.05% of the initial aggregate principal amount of the securitized utility tariff bonds per annum, plus out-of-pocket expenses. The annual servicing fee for the securitized utility tariff bonds payable to any other servicer not affiliated with Evergy Missouri West must not at any time exceed 0.60% of the original principal amount of the securitized utility tariff bonds unless such higher rate is approved by the MPSC and the indenture trustee and subject to rating agency condition. In no event will the trustee be liable for any servicing fee in its individual capacity.
Federal Income Tax Status:    In the opinion of Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP (“Hunton”) counsel to the issuing entity and to Evergy Missouri West, for federal income tax purposes, the issuance of the securitized utility tariff bonds will be a “qualifying securitization” within the meaning of Revenue Procedure 2005-62, the securitized utility tariff bonds will constitute indebtedness of Evergy Missouri West, the issuing entity’s sole member and Evergy Missouri West will not be treated as recognizing gross income upon the issuance of the securitized utility tariff bonds. If you purchase a beneficial interest in any securitized utility tariff bond, you agree by your purchase to treat the securitized utility tariff bonds as debt of the issuing entity’s sole member for federal income tax purposes. Please read “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences” in this prospectus.

 

13


Table of Contents
ERISA Considerations:    Employee benefit plans or other arrangements that provide retirement income that are subject to ERISA or Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code and investors acting on behalf of, or using assets of, such plans or arrangements may acquire the securitized utility tariff bonds subject to specified conditions. The acquisition, holding or disposition of the securitized utility tariff bonds could be treated as a direct or indirect prohibited transaction under ERISA and/or Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code. Accordingly, by acquiring and holding the securitized utility tariff bonds, each investor that is, or is acting on behalf of, or using assets of, such an employee benefit plan or arrangement subject to ERISA and/or Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code will be deemed to certify that the acquisition, holding and subsequent disposition of the securitized utility tariff bonds will not constitute or result in a non-exempt prohibited transaction under ERISA or Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code. Please read “ERISA Considerations” in this prospectus.
Credit Ratings:    The issuing entity expects the securitized utility tariff bonds will receive credit ratings from at least two nationally recognized statistical rating organizations. Please read “Ratings for the Securitized Utility Tariff Bonds” in this prospectus.
Use of Proceeds:    Proceeds will be used to pay expenses of issuance and to purchase the securitized utility tariff property from Evergy Missouri West. In accordance with the financing order, Evergy Missouri West will use the proceeds it receives from the sale of the securitized utility tariff property to recover the qualified extraordinary costs incurred by Evergy Missouri West in connection with the anomalous weather event Winter Storm Uri as approved in the financing order. Please read “Use of Proceeds” in this prospectus.
1940 Act Registration:    The issuing entity will be relying on an exclusion from the definition of “investment company” under the 1940 Act contained in Rule 3a-7 under the 1940 Act, although there may be additional exclusions or exemptions available to the issuing entity. The issuing entity will be structured so as not to constitute a “covered fund” for purposes of the Volcker Rule under the Dodd-Frank Act.
Credit Risk Retention:    The securitized utility tariff bonds are not subject to the 5% risk retention requirements imposed by Section 15G of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or the Exchange Act due to the exemption provided in Rule 19(b)(8) of the risk retention regulations in 17 C.F.R. Part 246 of the Exchange Act or Regulation RR. For information regarding the requirements of the European Union Securitization Regulation as to risk retention and other matters, please read “Risk Factors—Other Risks Associated with an Investment in the Securitized Utility Tariff Bonds— Regulatory provisions affecting certain investors could adversely affect the price and liquidity of the securitized utility tariff bonds” in this prospectus.
Minimum Denomination:    $2,000, or integral multiples of $1,000 in excess thereof, except for one securitized utility tariff bond of each tranche which may be of a smaller denomination.
Expected Settlement:    On or about                             , 2023, settling flat. DTC, Clearstream and Euroclear.

 

14


Table of Contents

SUMMARY OF RISK FACTORS

Set forth below is a summary of the material risk factors which you should consider before deciding whether to invest in the securitized utility tariff bonds. These risks can affect the timing or ultimate payment of the securitized utility tariff bonds and value of your security. A description of such risk factors in greater details follows this summary.

Limited Source of Payment for the Securitized Utility Tariff Bonds: The only source of funds for the securitized utility tariff bonds is the securitized utility tariff property and the other limited moneys held by the trustee. At the time of issuance of the securitized utility tariff bonds, the issuing entity will have no other assets and the securitized utility tariff bonds are non-recourse to Evergy Missouri West. Therefore, the sources for repayment of the securitized utility tariff bonds are limited. You must rely for payment of the securitized utility tariff bonds solely upon the Securitization Law, state and federal constitutional rights to enforcement of the provisions of the Securitization Law, the irrevocable financing order, collections of the securitized utility tariff charges and funds on deposit in the related accounts held by the trustee.

Risks Associated with Potential Judicial, Legislative or Regulatory Actions: The securitized utility tariff property is an asset created under the Securitization Law and through regulatory proceedings at the MPSC. The Securitization Law may be challenged in court.

The Missouri legislature, or the voters of the State using their initiative powers, may attempt to amend the Securitization Law, which could potentially impair the value of the securitized utility tariff property. Further, Evergy Missouri West may fail or be unsuccessful in challenging such actions. Neither the issuing entity nor Evergy Missouri West will indemnify you for any changes of law, whether as a result of constitutional amendment, legislative enactment, any regulatory or administrative action or any judicial proceedings.

In addition, the MPSC retains the power to adopt, revise or rescind rules or regulations affecting Evergy Missouri West and may attempt to take actions which could potentially impair the value of the securitized utility tariff property. Also, true-up adjustment submissions made with the MPSC may be challenged before the MPSC or in court, resulting in delays in implementation of the true-up adjustment. Additionally, subject to any required MPSC approval, Evergy Missouri West may establish billing, collection and posting arrangements with customers which could impact the timing and amount of customer payments.

Also, a municipality may seek to acquire portions of Evergy Missouri West’s service territory, and may dispute their obligation to pay the securitized utility tariff charges, or even if obligated to do so, may fail to bill and remit the securitized utility tariff charges on a timely basis.

Servicing Forecasting and Related Servicing Risks: The collection of securitized utility tariff charges on a timely and sufficient basis depends upon the ability of the servicer to accurately forecast customer usage. If the servicer inaccurately forecasts consumption or underestimates customer delinquencies for any reason, there could be a shortfall or material delay in securitized utility tariff charge collections. Factors which might cause inaccurate projections of usage or customer delinquencies, include unanticipated weather conditions, rolling blackouts due to capacity constraints, cyber-attacks on Evergy Missouri West infrastructure, general economic conditions, natural or man-made disasters, such as earthquakes or pandemics, such as the pandemic caused by COVID-19. Evergy Missouri West’s ability to collect securitized utility tariff charges from customers may also be impacted by some of these same factors.

It may be difficult for the issuing entity to find a replacement servicer should Evergy Missouri West default in its obligations. Assuming the issuing entity can obtain a successor servicer, the successor servicer may be less effective in servicing the charges, potentially resulting in delay in collections, which might reduce the value of your investment.

Risks Associated with the Unusual Nature of Securitized Utility Tariff Property: The unusual nature of the securitized utility tariff property makes it unlikely that, in the event of a default, the securitized utility tariff property could be sold. Although the securitized utility tariff bonds may be accelerated in the event of a default, as a practical matter, the securitized utility tariff charges would likely not be accelerated.

 

15


Table of Contents

Natural Disaster-Related Risk: Severe weather events and other natural disasters, including, storms, tornadoes, floods, extreme heat events, drought, lightning, solar events, electromagnetic events, wind events or other weather-related conditions, climate change, or natural disasters, could result in severe business disruptions, prolonged power outages, property damage, injuries and loss of life, significant decreases in revenues and earnings, and significant additional costs to Evergy Missouri West. Transmission and/or distribution and generation facilities could be damaged or destroyed and usage of electricity could be interrupted temporarily, reducing the collections of securitized utility tariff charges or otherwise impacting Evergy Missouri West’s ability to service the securitized utility tariff property. As the securitized utility tariff charge is a consumption-based charge, any unexpected failure to deliver electricity may impact the collection of securitized utility tariff charges. Further, there could be longer-lasting weather-related adverse effects on residential and commercial development and economic activity among Evergy Missouri West’s customers. As a consequence of and in response to these severe events, legislative action adverse to the bondholders might be taken, and such legislation, if challenged as a violation of the State Pledge, might be defended on the basis of public necessity.

Risks Associated with Potential Bankruptcy of the Seller or the Servicer: In the event of a bankruptcy by Evergy Missouri West, you may experience a delay in payment or a default on payment of the securitized utility tariff bonds due to various factors, including the comingling of securitized utility tariff charges with other revenue of the servicer, a challenge to the characterization of the sale of the securitized utility tariff property as a financing transaction, an effort to substantively consolidate the issuing entity’s assets and liabilities with those of Evergy Missouri West, a characterization of fixed recovery payments to the trustee as preferential transfers, the treatment of the issuing entity’s claims against the seller as unsecured claims and a general limitation on the remedies available in a bankruptcy, including the risk of an automatic stay.

Other Risks Associated with an Investment in the Securitized Utility Tariff Bonds: Other risks associated with the purchase of the securitized utility tariff bonds include the inadequacy of any indemnification obligations provided by the seller, the impact of a change of ratings or the issuance of an unsolicited rating, the absence of a secondary market for the securitized utility tariff bonds, the issuance of additional securitized utility tariff bonds or similar instruments creating greater burdens on the same customers, regulatory actions affecting certain investors and losses on investments held by the trustee.

 

16


Table of Contents

RISK FACTORS

Please carefully consider all the information the depositor has included or incorporated by reference in this prospectus, including the risks described below and the statements contained under the heading “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information” in this prospectus before deciding whether to invest in the securitized utility tariff bonds.

You may experience material payment delays or incur a loss on your investment in the securitized utility tariff bonds because the source of funds for payment is limited.

The only source of funds for payment of the securitized utility tariff bonds will be the collateral, which consists of:

 

   

the securitized utility tariff property securing the securitized utility tariff bonds, including the right to impose, collect and receive related securitized utility tariff charges and the issuing entity’s rights under the financing order to the true-up mechanism;

 

   

the funds on deposit in the accounts for the securitized utility tariff bonds held by the trustee; and

 

   

the issuing entity’s rights under various contracts the issuing entity describes in this prospectus.

The securitized utility tariff bonds will not be insured or guaranteed by Evergy Missouri West, including in its capacity as sponsor, depositor, seller or servicer, or by its parent, Evergy, any of their respective affiliates, the trustee or any other person or entity. The securitized utility tariff bonds will be nonrecourse obligations, secured only by the collateral. Delays in payment on the securitized utility tariff bonds might result in a reduction in the market value of the securitized utility tariff bonds and, therefore, the value of your investment in the securitized utility tariff bonds.

Thus, you must rely for payment of the securitized utility tariff bonds solely upon the Securitization Law, state and federal constitutional rights to enforcement of the Securitization Law, the irrevocable financing order, collections of the securitized utility tariff charges and funds on deposit in the related accounts held by the trustee. If these amounts are not sufficient to make payments or there are delays in recoveries, you may experience material payment delays or incur a loss on your investment in the securitized utility tariff bonds. The issuing entity’s organizational documents will restrict the issuing entity’s right to acquire other assets unrelated to the transactions described in this prospectus. Please read “Evergy Missouri West Storm Funding I, LLC, The Issuing Entity” in this prospectus.

 

17


Table of Contents

RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH POTENTIAL JUDICIAL, LEGISLATIVE OR REGULATORY ACTIONS

The issuing entity will not be obligated to indemnify you for changes in law.

Neither the issuing entity nor Evergy Missouri West will indemnify you for any changes in the law, including any federal preemption or repeal or amendment of the Securitization Law, that may affect the value of your utility tariff bonds. Evergy Missouri West will agree in the sale agreement to institute any action or proceeding as may be reasonably necessary to block or overturn any attempts to cause a repeal, modification or amendment to the Securitization Law that would be materially adverse to the issuing entity, the trustee or bondholders. However, Evergy Missouri West may not be able to take such action and, if Evergy Missouri West does take action, such action may not be successful. Although Evergy Missouri West or any successor seller might be required to indemnify the issuing entity if legal action based on the law in effect at the time of the issuance of the utility tariff bonds invalidates the securitized utility tariff property, such indemnification obligations do not apply for any changes in law after the date the utility tariff bonds are issued, whether such changes in law are effected by means of any legislative enactment, any constitutional amendment, any regulatory or administrative action or any final and non-appealable judicial decision. Please read “The Sale Agreement—Seller Representations and Warranties” and “The Servicing Agreement—Servicing Standards and Covenants” in this prospectus.

Future judicial action could reduce the value of your investment in the utility tariff bonds.

The securitized utility tariff property is created pursuant to the Securitization Law, the financing order and the issuance advice letter relating to the utility tariff bonds. The Securitization Law initially became effective on August 28, 2021. Evergy Missouri West is one of the first utilities to issue utility tariff bonds under the Securitization Law.

Missouri and other states have passed laws permitting the securitization of electrical corporation costs similar to the Securitization Law, such as costs associated with the deregulation of the electric market, environmental control costs and hurricane recovery costs. Some of the laws have been challenged by judicial actions or in utility commission proceedings. To date, none of these challenges has succeeded, but future challenges might ensue. An unfavorable decision regarding another state’s law would not automatically invalidate the Securitization Law or the financing order, but it might provoke a challenge to the Securitization Law, establish a non-binding legal precedent for a successful challenge to the Securitization Law or heighten awareness of the political and other risks of the utility tariff bonds, and in that way may limit their liquidity and value. Therefore, legal activity in other states may indirectly affect the value of your investment in the utility tariff bonds.

Future state legislative action, including a voter initiative, might attempt to reduce the value of your investment in the utility tariff bonds.

In the Securitization Law, the State has pledged that the State and its agencies including the MPSC, will not take or permit any action that impairs or would impair the value of the securitized utility tariff property or, except for changes made pursuant to the true-up mechanism, reduce, alter or impair the securitized utility tariff charges until the utility tariff bonds, together with the interest thereon and related financing costs, are fully paid. For a description of the State Pledge, please read “The Securitized Utility Tariff Property and the Securitization Law—The Financing Order and the Securitized Utility Tariff— State Pledge” in this prospectus. However, the Securitization Law further provides that nothing therein precludes limitation or alteration if full compensation is made by law for the full protection of the securitized utility tariff charges collected pursuant to the financing order and of the bondholders and any assignee or financing party entering into a contact with Evergy Missouri West. It is unclear how “full compensation” would be “made by law for the full protection” of holders of utility tariff bonds by the State if such limitation or alteration were attempted. Accordingly, that full protection could conceivably have an adverse effect on the market value of the utility tariff bonds or the timing of receipt of payments with respect to the utility tariff bonds.

In addition, under Article III of the Missouri Constitution, legal voters have the right through an initiative petition to propose laws as well as amendments to the Missouri Constitution. Generally, any matter that is a proper subject of legislation can become the subject of an initiative, however, under Article III, Section 51 an initiative cannot be used for the appropriation of money other than of new revenues created and provided thereby. For an initiative

 

18


Table of Contents

measure to qualify for an election, the initiative measure must, among other procedural requirements, be submitted to the Missouri Secretary of State. Initiative petitions proposing amendments to the Missouri Constitution shall be signed by eight percent of the legal voters in each of two-thirds of the congressional districts in the state, and petitions proposing laws shall be signed by five percent of such voters. Any measure proposed shall take effect when approved by a majority of the votes cast thereon.

As of the date of this prospectus, the depositor is not aware of any pending Missouri legislation or voter initiative that would materially and adversely affect any of the provisions of the Securitization Law. Nevertheless, the depositor cannot assure you that a repeal or amendment of the Securitization Law will not be adopted or sought, either by the Missouri legislature, or the electorate acting through its initiative powers, or that any action or refusal to act by the State of Missouri will not occur, any of which may constitute a violation of the State Pledge with the holders. If a violation of the State Pledge occurs, costly and time-consuming litigation might ensue. Any litigation might materially and adversely affect the price of the utility tariff bonds and your ability to resell the utility tariff bonds and might delay the timing of payments on the utility tariff bonds. Moreover, given the lack of controlling precedent directly addressing the utility tariff bonds and the State Pledge, the depositor cannot predict the outcome of any litigation with certainty. Accordingly, such litigation could result in delays in receipt of payments on the utility tariff bonds or losses on your investment in the utility tariff bonds.

The MPSC might attempt to take actions that could reduce the value of your investment in the utility tariff bonds.

The Securitization Law provides that a financing order is irrevocable and that, except for changes made pursuant to the true-up adjustment, the MPSC may not amend, modify or terminate the financing order by any subsequent action or reduce, impair, postpone, terminate or otherwise adjust the securitized utility tariff charges approved in the financing order. However, the MPSC retains the power to adopt, revise or rescind rules or regulations affecting Evergy Missouri West.

The servicer is required to submit with the MPSC, on the issuing entity’s behalf, certain adjustments of the securitized utility tariff charges. Please read “Evergy Missouri West’s Financing Order—Fixed Recovery Charges—The Financing Order Requires the Servicer to Periodically ‘True-Up’ the Fixed Recovery Charge” and “The Servicing Agreement— True-Up Adjustment Submissions” in this prospectus. Challenges to or delays in the true-up process might adversely affect the market perception and valuation of the utility tariff bonds. Also, any litigation might not only be costly and time-consuming, but also materially interrupt securitized utility tariff charge collections due to delayed implementation of true-up adjustments and might result in missing payments or payment delays and lengthened weighted-average lives of the utility tariff bonds.

The servicer may not fulfill its obligations to act on behalf of the bondholders to protect bondholders from actions by the MPSC or the State of Missouri, or the servicer may be unsuccessful in any such attempt.

The servicer will agree in the servicing agreement to take any action or proceeding necessary to compel performance by the MPSC and the State of Missouri of any of their obligations or duties under the Securitization Law or the financing order, including any actions reasonably necessary to block or overturn attempts to cause a repeal or modification of the Securitization Law or the financing order. The servicer, however, may not be able to take those actions for a number of reasons, including legal or regulatory restrictions, financial constraints and practical difficulties in challenging any such legislative enactment or constitutional amendment. Additionally, any action the servicer is able to take may not be successful. Any such failure to perform the servicer’s obligations or to successfully compel performance by the MPSC or the State of Missouri could negatively affect bondholders’ rights and result in a loss of their investment.

 

19


Table of Contents

It may be difficult to accurately estimate and collect securitized utility tariff charges from consumers who self- generate and who disconnect from Evergy Missouri West’s grid.

Broader use of distributed generation by consumers may result from consumers’ changing perceptions of the merits of utilizing existing generation technology, tax or other economic incentives or from technological developments resulting in smaller-scale, more fuel efficient, more environmentally friendly and/or more cost effective distributed generation. Moreover, an increase in distributed generation may result if extreme weather conditions result in shortages of grid-supplied energy or if other factors cause grid-supplied energy to be less reliable. More widespread use of distributed generation, particularly battery storage, might allow greater numbers of consumers to reduce or eliminate their payment of securitized utility tariff charges causing securitized utility tariff charges to remaining consumers to increase.

 

20


Table of Contents

SERVICING FORECASTING RISKS

Inaccurate consumption or collection forecasting might reduce scheduled payments on the securitized utility tariff bonds.

The securitized utility tariff charges are calculated based on forecasted customer usage. The amount and the rate of securitized utility tariff charge collections will depend in part on actual electricity consumption and the timing of collections and write-offs. The financing order approves the methodology by which the securitized utility tariff charges will be calculated and adjusted from time to time by the servicer pursuant to true-up advice letters submitted to the MPSC as described below. Pursuant to the financing order, except for Exempted Customers, the securitized utility tariff charge will be an equal cent per kWh charge across all customer classes that is adjusted for line losses determined for each voltage level class. If the servicer inaccurately forecasts either electricity consumption or underestimates customer delinquency or write-offs when setting or adjusting the securitized utility tariff charge, there could be a shortfall or material delay in securitized utility tariff charge collections, which might result in missed or delayed payments of principal and interest and lengthened weighted average life of the securitized utility tariff bonds. Please read “Evergy Missouri West’s Financing Order—Securitized Utility Tariff Charges—The Financing Order Approves the Methodology used to Calculate the Securitized Utility Tariff Charges” and “The Servicing Agreement— True-Up Adjustment Submissions” in this prospectus.

Inaccurate forecasting of electricity consumption by the servicer might result from, among other things:

 

   

unanticipated weather or economic conditions, resulting in less electricity consumption than forecast;

 

   

general economic conditions causing customers to migrate from Evergy Missouri West’s service territory or reduce their electricity consumption;

 

   

the occurrence of a natural disaster, or an act of war or terrorism, or other catastrophic event, including pandemics, unexpectedly disrupting electrical service and reducing electricity consumption;

 

   

unanticipated changes in the market structure of the electric industry;

 

   

large customers unexpectedly ceasing business or departing Evergy Missouri West’s service territory;

 

   

dramatic and unexpected changes in energy prices resulting in decreased electricity consumption;

 

   

customers consuming less electricity than anticipated because of increased energy prices, unanticipated increases in conservation efforts or unanticipated increases in electric consumption efficiency; or

 

   

differences or changes in forecasting methodology.

Inaccurate forecasting of delinquencies or write-offs by the servicer could result from, among other things:

 

   

unexpected deterioration of the economy, the occurrence of a natural disaster, an act of war or terrorism or other catastrophic events, including pandemics, causing greater write-offs than expected or forcing Evergy Missouri West or a successor utility to grant additional payment relief to more customers; or

 

   

an unexpected change in law that makes it more difficult for Evergy Missouri West or a successor distribution company to terminate service to nonpaying customers, or that requires Evergy Missouri West or a successor to apply more lenient credit standards for customers.

 

21


Table of Contents

The spread of COVID-19 and resulting impact on business and economic conditions could continue to negatively affect Evergy Missouri West’s business and operations, which could impact Evergy Missouri West’s ability to collect and service the securitized utility tariff charges and might reduce scheduled payments on the securitized utility tariff bonds.

The COVID-19 pandemic has had, and may continue to have, a significant impact on the way that Evergy Missouri West conducts its operations and could adversely impact its results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. Further, the spread of COVID-19 has resulted in efforts to contain the virus, such as quarantines, restrictions on travel, closures and reduced operations of businesses, governmental agencies and other institutions. The pandemic, along with the efforts to contain the virus, has caused and could continue to cause an economic slowdown or recession, result in significant disruptions or reductions in various public, commercial or industrial activities, cause employee absences and contractor or third party service provider disruptions, which could interfere with Evergy Missouri West’s operations or the operations of its customers and its obligation to act as servicer.

The COVID-19 pandemic has altered electricity usage patterns, including an overall reduction in demand and shifting usage away from customers with relatively higher load requirements, such as industrial and commercial customers, toward customers with relatively lower load requirements, such as residential customers. These changes in electricity usage patterns and the extent to which some of these shifts could become long-term or permanent could result in a significant decrease in Evergy Missouri West’s sales of electricity.

Evergy Missouri West has also temporarily implemented policies, and in the future may implement additional policies, that are intended to ease the financial burden of the pandemic on customers, such as temporarily extending payment options and offering incentives for customer payments on overdue balances as well as the elimination of late payment fees and disconnections for non-payment. There is also the possibility that legislation or regulations could be enacted at the federal or state level that would further restrict Evergy Missouri West’s ability to discontinue service to customers in the event of non-payment or to collect amounts owed from customers for service provided. These measures could result in an overall increase in customer non-payment or delay in the timely receipt of customer payments, which could result in delays in the collection of securitized utility tariff charges.

In addition, the COVID-19 pandemic has changed the way Evergy Missouri West operates and has increased the use of technology to enable remote-working arrangements, which may increase or expose previously unknown vulnerabilities. Public reports have also indicated an increase in cyberattacks in general since the start of the pandemic due, in part, to the increase in the number of employees working remotely and the proliferation of the different ways in which employees and third parties interact with Evergy Missouri West’s information technology infrastructure. A successful attack against Evergy Missouri West or cyberattacks to interconnected utilities, municipalities, others or widespread attacks to the utility industry could result in disruption to Evergy Missouri West’s generation, transmission and distribution and reduce sales, which could result in delays for billing and collections of the securitized utility tariff charges.

Any of these circumstances, or other impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, could adversely affect customer demand or revenues, impact the ability of Evergy Missouri West’s suppliers, vendors or contractors to perform, or cause other unpredictable events, which could have a significant adverse impact on Evergy Missouri West’s results of operations, financial position and cash flows. The financing order requires that the servicer submit with the MPSC periodic true-up advice letters to adjust the securitized utility tariff charges to ensure the recovery of revenues sufficient to provide for the timely payment of the periodic payment requirement. Standard annual true-up adjustment advice letters, standard semi-annual true-up advice letters, and standard interim true-up adjustment advice letters must be submitted not less than thirty (30) days before the billing cycle of the month in which the revised securitized utility tariff charge will be ineffective. Given that there is at least thirty days between submission of a true-up advice letter and the effective date of an adjustment, a reduction in collections as the result of the imposition of a new moratorium or similar customer protection measure and delay of implementing an adjustment may reduce scheduled payments on the securitized utility tariff bonds. Please read “The Depositor, Seller, Initial Servicer and Sponsor—COVID-19 Customer Protections” in this prospectus.

Evergy Missouri West expects additional financial impacts in the future as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic but is unable to predict the timing, duration or intensity of the COVID-19 pandemic situation.

 

22


Table of Contents

Your investment in the securitized utility tariff bonds depends on Evergy Missouri West or its successor or assignee, acting as servicer of the securitized utility tariff property.

Evergy Missouri West, as servicer, will be responsible for, among other things, calculating, billing and collecting the securitized utility tariff charges from customers, submitting requests to the MPSC to adjust these charges, monitoring the collateral for the securitized utility tariff bonds and taking certain actions in the event of non-payment by customers. The trustee’s receipt of collections in respect of the securitized utility tariff charges, which will be used to make payments on securitized utility tariff bonds, will depend in part on the skill and diligence of the servicer in performing these functions. The systems that the servicer has in place for securitized utility tariff charge billings and collections, together with any MPSC regulations governing electric service providers (“ESPs”), might, in particular circumstances, cause the servicer to experience difficulty in performing these functions in a timely and completely accurate manner. If the servicer fails to make collections for any reason, then the servicer’s payments to the trustee in respect of the securitized utility tariff charges might be delayed or reduced. In that event, the issuing entity’s payments on the securitized utility tariff bonds might be delayed or reduced.

If the issuing entity replaces Evergy Missouri West as the servicer, the issuing entity may experience difficulties finding and using a replacement servicer.

If Evergy Missouri West ceases to service the securitized utility tariff property related to the securitized utility tariff bonds, it might be difficult to find a successor servicer. Also, any successor servicer might have less experience and ability than Evergy Missouri West and might experience difficulties in collecting securitized utility tariff charges and determining appropriate adjustments to the securitized utility tariff charges and billing and/or payment arrangements may change, resulting in delays or disruptions of collections. A successor servicer might not be willing to perform except for fees higher than those approved by the MPSC pursuant to the financing order and might charge fees that, while permitted under the financing order, are substantially higher than the fees paid to Evergy Missouri West as servicer. Although a true-up adjustment would be required to allow for the increase in fees, there could be a gap between the incurrence of those fees and the implementation of a true-up adjustment to adjust for that increase that might adversely affect distributions to bondholders. In the event of the commencement of a case by or against the servicer under Title 11 of the United States Code, as amended, of the Bankruptcy Code, or similar laws, the issuing entity and the trustee might be prevented from effecting a transfer of servicing due to operation of the Bankruptcy Code. Any of these factors might delay the timing of payments and reduce the value of your investment.

It might be difficult for successor servicers to collect the securitized utility tariff charges from Evergy Missouri West’s customers.

Any successor servicer may bring an action against a customer for non-payment of the securitized utility tariff charge, but only a successor servicer that is a successor electrical corporation may terminate service for failure to pay the securitized utility tariff charges. A successor servicer that does not have the threat of termination of service available to enforce payment of the securitized utility tariff charge would need to rely on the successor electrical corporation to threaten to terminate service for nonpayment of other portions of monthly electrical corporation bills. This inability might reduce the value of your investment.

 

23


Table of Contents

RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH THE UNUSUAL NATURE OF THE SECURITIZED UTILITY TARIFF PROPERTY

Foreclosure of the trustee’s lien on the securitized utility tariff property for the securitized utility tariff bonds might not be practical, and acceleration of the securitized utility tariff bonds before maturity might have little practical effect.

Under the Securitization Law and the indenture, the trustee or the bondholders have the right to foreclose or otherwise enforce the lien on the securitized utility tariff property securing the securitized utility tariff bonds. However, in the event of foreclosure, there is likely to be a limited market, if any, for the securitized utility tariff property. Therefore, foreclosure might not be a realistic or practical remedy. Moreover, although principal of the securitized utility tariff bonds will be due and payable upon acceleration of the securitized utility tariff bonds before maturity, securitized utility tariff charges likely would not be accelerated and the nature of the issuing entity’s business will result in principal of the securitized utility tariff bonds being paid as funds become available. If there is an acceleration of the securitized utility tariff bonds, all tranches of the securitized utility tariff bonds will be paid pro rata; therefore, some tranches might be paid earlier than expected and some tranches might be paid later than expected.

 

24


Table of Contents

NATURAL DISASTER-RELATED RISKS

Weather is a major driver of Evergy Missouri West’s results of operations, financial position and cash flows and Evergy Missouri West is subject to risks associated with climate change.

Weather conditions directly influence the demand for and price of electricity. Evergy Missouri West is significantly impacted by seasonality, and, due to energy demand created by air conditioning load, highest revenues are typically recorded in the third quarter. Unusually mild winter or summer weather can adversely affect sales. In addition, severe weather and events, including tornadoes, snow, fire, rain, flooding, drought and ice storms, can be destructive and cause outages and property damage that can result in increased expenses, lower revenues and additional restoration costs. Additionally, because many of Evergy Missouri West’s generating stations utilize water for cooling, low water and flow levels can increase maintenance costs at these stations, result in limited power production and require modifications to plant operations. High water conditions can also impair planned deliveries of fuel to generating stations or otherwise adversely impact its ability to operate these stations. Climate change may produce more frequent or severe weather events, such as storms, droughts or floods and could also impact the economic health of Evergy Missouri West’s service territories. An increase in the frequency or severity of extreme weather events or a deterioration in the economic health of Evergy Missouri West’s service territories could have a material adverse effect on its results of operations, and cash flows resulting in reduced securitized utility tariff charge collections.

If Evergy Missouri West’s rates cannot be adjusted to reflect the impact of events or conditions caused by climate change, Evergy Missouri West’s financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, and cash flows could be materially affected, which, in turn, could reduce the collections of securitized utility tariff charges or otherwise impact Evergy Missouri West’s ability to service the securitized utility tariff property.

 

25


Table of Contents

RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH POTENTIAL BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS OF THE SELLER OR THE SERVICER

For a more detailed discussion of the following bankruptcy risks, please read “How a Bankruptcy May Affect Your Investment” in this prospectus.

The servicer will commingle the securitized utility tariff charges with other revenues it collects, which might obstruct access to the securitized utility tariff charges in case of the servicer’s bankruptcy and reduce the value of your investment in the securitized utility tariff bonds.

The servicer will be required to remit estimated securitized utility tariff charge collections to the trustee no later than the second servicer business day of receipt. The servicer will not segregate the securitized utility tariff charges from the other funds it collects from customers or its general funds. The securitized utility tariff charges will be estimated and segregated only when the servicer remits them to the trustee.

Despite this requirement, the servicer might fail to remit the full amount of the securitized utility tariff charges payable to the trustee or might fail to do so on a timely basis. This failure, whether voluntary or involuntary, might materially reduce the amount of securitized utility tariff charge collections available to make payments on the securitized utility tariff bonds.

Absent a default under the servicing agreement, Evergy Missouri West will be permitted to remit estimated securitized utility tariff charges to the trustee. While Evergy Missouri West will be responsible for identifying and calculating the actual amount of securitized utility tariff charges in the event of a default under the servicing agreement, it may be difficult for Evergy Missouri West to identify such charges, given existing limitations in its billing system.

The Securitization Law provides that the priority of a lien and security interest perfected in securitized utility tariff property is not impaired by the commingling of the funds arising from securitized utility tariff charges with any other funds. In a bankruptcy of the servicer, however, a bankruptcy court might rule that federal bankruptcy law takes precedence over the Securitization Law and might decline to recognize the issuing entity’s right to collections of the securitized utility tariff charges that are commingled with other funds of the servicer as of the date of bankruptcy. If so, the collections of the securitized utility tariff charges held by the servicer as of the date of bankruptcy would not be available to pay amounts owing on the securitized utility tariff bonds. In this case, the issuing entity would have only a general unsecured claim against the servicer for those amounts. This decision could cause material delays in payments of principal or interest, or losses, on your securitized utility tariff bonds and could materially reduce the value of your investment in the securitized utility tariff bonds.

The bankruptcy of Evergy Missouri West or any successor seller might result in losses or delays in payments on the securitized utility tariff bonds.

The seller will represent and warrant in the sale agreement that the transfer of the securitized utility tariff property to the issuing entity under that sale agreement is a valid sale and assignment of that securitized utility tariff property from the seller to the issuing entity. The seller will also represent, warrant, and covenant that it will take the appropriate actions under the Securitization Law to perfect this sale. The Securitization Law provides that the transactions described in the sale agreement shall constitute a sale of the securitized utility tariff property to the issuing entity, and the seller and the issuing entity will treat the transaction as a sale under applicable law, although for financial reporting and tax reporting purposes the transaction will be treated as debt of the seller. If the seller were to become a debtor in a bankruptcy case, and a party in interest (including the seller itself) were to take the position that the sale of the securitized utility tariff property to the issuing entity should be recharacterized as the grant of a security interest in such securitized utility tariff property to secure a borrowing of the seller, delays in payments on the securitized utility tariff bonds could result. If a court were to adopt such position, then delays or reductions in payments on the securitized utility tariff bonds could result.

 

26


Table of Contents

Pursuant to the Securitization Law and the financing order, upon the sale of the securitized utility tariff property, the securitized utility tariff property is created as a present intangible property right, and it thereafter exists until the securitized utility tariff bonds are paid in full and all financing costs and other costs of the securitized utility tariff bonds have been recovered in full. Nonetheless, if the seller were to become the debtor in a bankruptcy case, a party in interest (including the seller itself) may take the position that, because the securitized utility tariff charges are usage-based charges, securitized utility tariff property comes into existence only as customers use electricity. If a court were to adopt this position, no assurance can be given that the court would not also rule that any securitized utility tariff property relating to electricity consumed after the commencement of the seller’s bankruptcy case was not required to be transferred to the issuing entity, thus resulting in delays or reductions of payments on the securitized utility tariff bonds.

A bankruptcy court generally follows state property law on issues such as those addressed by the state law provisions described above. However, a bankruptcy court does not follow state law if it determines that the state law is contrary to a paramount federal bankruptcy policy or interest. If a bankruptcy court in an Evergy Missouri West bankruptcy refused to enforce one or more of the state property law provisions described above, the effect of this decision on you as a beneficial owner of the securitized utility tariff bonds might be similar to the treatment you would receive in an Evergy Missouri West bankruptcy if the securitized utility tariff bonds had been issued directly by Evergy Missouri West. A decision by the bankruptcy court that, despite the issuing entity’s separateness from Evergy Missouri West, the issuing entity’s assets and liabilities and those of Evergy Missouri West should be consolidated would have a similar effect on you as a bondholder.

The issuing entity has taken steps together with Evergy Missouri West, as the seller, to reduce the risk that in the event the seller or an affiliate of the seller were to become the debtor in a bankruptcy case, a court would order that the issuing entity’s assets and liabilities be substantively consolidated with those of Evergy Missouri West or an affiliate.

Nonetheless, these steps might not be completely effective, and thus if Evergy Missouri West or an affiliate of the seller were to become a debtor in a bankruptcy case, a court might order that the issuing entity’s assets and liabilities be consolidated with those of Evergy Missouri West or an affiliate of the seller. This might cause material delays in payment of, or losses on, your securitized utility tariff bonds and might materially reduce the value of your investment in the securitized utility tariff bonds. For example:

 

   

without permission from the bankruptcy court, the trustee might be prevented from taking actions against Evergy Missouri West or recovering or using funds on your behalf or replacing Evergy Missouri West as the servicer;

 

   

the bankruptcy court might order the trustee to exchange the securitized utility tariff property for other property of lower value;

 

   

tax or other government liens on Evergy Missouri West’s property might have priority over the trustee’s lien and might be paid from collected securitized utility tariff charges before payments on the securitized utility tariff bonds;

 

   

the trustee’s lien might not be properly perfected in the collected securitized utility tariff property collections prior to or as of the date of Evergy Missouri West’s bankruptcy, with the result that the securitized utility tariff bonds would represent only general unsecured claims against Evergy Missouri West;

 

   

the bankruptcy court might rule that neither the issuing entity’s property interest nor the trustee’s lien extends to securitized utility tariff charges in respect of electricity consumed after the commencement of Evergy Missouri West’s bankruptcy case, with the result that the securitized utility tariff bonds would represent only general unsecured claims against Evergy Missouri West;

 

   

the issuing entity and Evergy Missouri West might be relieved of any obligation to make any payments on the securitized utility tariff bonds during the pendency of the bankruptcy case and might be relieved of any obligation to pay interest accruing after the commencement of the bankruptcy case;

 

   

Evergy Missouri West might be able to alter the terms of the securitized utility tariff bonds as part of its plan of reorganization;

 

   

the bankruptcy court might rule that the securitized utility tariff charges should be used to pay, or that the issuing entity should be charged for, a portion of the cost of providing electric service; or

 

27


Table of Contents
   

the bankruptcy court might rule that the remedy provisions of the sale agreement are unenforceable, leaving the issuing entity with an unsecured claim for actual damages against Evergy Missouri West that may be difficult to prove or, if proven, to collect in full.

Furthermore, if Evergy Missouri West enters bankruptcy proceedings, it might be permitted to stop acting as servicer, and it may be difficult to find a third party to act as servicer. The failure of the servicer to perform its duties or the inability to find a successor servicer might cause payment delays or losses on your investment in the securitized utility tariff bonds. Also, the mere fact of a servicer or seller bankruptcy proceeding might have an adverse effect on the resale market for the securitized utility tariff bonds and on the value of the securitized utility tariff bonds.

The sale of the securitized utility tariff property might be construed as a financing and not a sale in a case of Evergy Missouri West’s bankruptcy which might delay or limit payments on the securitized utility tariff bonds.

The Securitization Law provides that the transfer of securitized utility tariff property will be as a sale or other absolute transfer if the documents governing the transaction expressly state that the transaction is a sale or other absolute transfer other than for federal and state income tax purposes. The issuing entity and Evergy Missouri West will treat the transaction as a sale under applicable law, although for financial reporting and income and franchise tax purposes the transaction is intended to be treated as a financing. In the event of a bankruptcy of Evergy Missouri West, a party in interest in the bankruptcy might assert that the sale of the securitized utility tariff property to the issuing entity was a financing transaction and not a “sale or other absolute transfer” and that the treatment of the transaction for financial reporting and tax purposes as a financing and not a sale, lends weight to that position. If a court were to characterize the transaction as a financing, the issuing entity expects that it would, on behalf of itself and the trustee, be treated as a secured creditor of Evergy Missouri West in the bankruptcy proceedings, although a court might determine that the issuing entity only has an unsecured claim against Evergy Missouri West. Even if the issuing entity had a security interest in the securitized utility tariff property, the issuing entity would not likely have access to the related securitized utility tariff charge collections during the bankruptcy and would be subject to the risks of a secured creditor in a bankruptcy case, including the possible bankruptcy risks described in the immediately preceding risk factor. As a result, repayment of the securitized utility tariff bonds might be significantly delayed and a plan of reorganization in the bankruptcy might permanently modify the amount and timing of payments to the issuing entity of the related securitized utility tariff charge collections and therefore the amount and timing of funds available to the issuing entity to pay bondholders.

If the servicer enters bankruptcy proceedings, the collections of the securitized utility tariff charges held by the servicer as of the date of bankruptcy might constitute preferences, which means these funds might be unavailable to pay amounts owing on the securitized utility tariff bonds.

In the event of a bankruptcy of the servicer, a party in interest might take the position that the remittance of funds prior to bankruptcy of the servicer, pursuant to the servicing agreement, constitutes a preference under bankruptcy law if the remittance of those funds was deemed to be paid on account of a preexisting debt. If a court were to hold that the remittance of funds constitutes a preference, any such remittance within 90 days of the filing of the bankruptcy petition could be avoidable, and the funds could be required to be returned to the bankruptcy estate of the servicer. To the extent that securitized utility tariff charges have been commingled with the general funds of the servicer, the risk that a court would hold that a remittance of funds was a preference would increase. Also, the issuing entity may be considered an “insider” of the servicer. If the issuing entity is considered to be an “insider” of the servicer, any such remittance to the issuing entity made within one year of the filing of the bankruptcy petition could be avoidable as well if the court were to hold that such remittance constitutes a preference. In either case, the issuing entity or the trustee would merely be an unsecured creditor of the servicer. If any funds were required to be returned to the bankruptcy estate of the servicer, the issuing entity would expect that the amount of any future securitized utility tariff charges would be increased through the statutory true-up mechanism to recover such amount, though this would not eliminate the risk of payment delays or losses on your investment in the securitized utility tariff bonds.

 

28


Table of Contents

Claims against Evergy Missouri West or any successor seller might be limited in the event of a bankruptcy of the seller.

If the seller were to become a debtor in a bankruptcy case, claims, including indemnity claims, by the issuing entity against the seller under the sale agreement and the other documents executed in connection with the sale agreement would be unsecured claims and would be adjudicated in the bankruptcy case. In addition, the bankruptcy court might estimate any contingent claims that the issuing entity has against the seller and, if it determines that the contingency giving rise to these claims is unlikely to occur, estimate the claims at a lower amount. A party in interest in the bankruptcy of the seller might challenge the enforceability of the indemnity provisions in a sale agreement. If a court were to hold that the indemnity provisions were unenforceable, the issuing entity would be left with a claim for actual damages against the seller based on breach of contract principles, which would be subject to estimation and/or calculation by the court. The issuing entity cannot give any assurance as to the result if any of the above-described actions or claims were made. Furthermore, the issuing entity cannot give any assurance as to what percentage of their claims, if any, unsecured creditors would receive in any bankruptcy proceeding involving the seller.

The bankruptcy of Evergy Missouri West or any successor seller might limit the remedies available to the trustee.

Upon an event of default for the securitized utility tariff bonds under the indenture, the Securitization Law permits the trustee to enforce the security interest in the securitized utility tariff property in accordance with the terms of the indenture. In this capacity, and pursuant to the Securitization Law and the financing order, the trustee is permitted to request the MPSC to order amounts arising from the securitized utility tariff charges to be transferred to a separate account for the bondholders benefit or request that a circuit court for the county or city where Evergy Missouri West is located to order the sequestration and payment to bondholders of all revenues arising with respect to the related securitized utility tariff charges. There can be no assurance, however, that the MPSC or a court would issue either order after an Evergy Missouri West bankruptcy in light of the automatic stay provisions of Section 362 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. In that event, the trustee would be required to seek an order from the bankruptcy court lifting the automatic stay to permit this action by the MPSC or a court, and an order requiring an accounting and segregation of the revenues arising from the securitized utility tariff property. There can be no assurance that a court would grant either order.

 

29


Table of Contents

OTHER RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH AN INVESTMENT IN THE SECURITIZED UTILITY TARIFF BONDS

Evergy Missouri West’s indemnification obligations under the sale and servicing agreements are limited and might not be sufficient to protect your investment in the securitized utility tariff bonds.

Evergy Missouri West is obligated under the sale agreement to indemnify the issuing entity and the trustee, for itself and on behalf of the bondholders, only in specified circumstances and will not be obligated to repurchase any securitized utility tariff property in the event of a breach of any of its representations, warranties or covenants regarding the securitized utility tariff property. Similarly, Evergy Missouri West is obligated under the servicing agreement to indemnify the issuing entity and the trustee, for itself and on behalf of the bondholders, only in specified circumstances. Please read “The Sale Agreement” and “The Servicing Agreement” in this prospectus.

Neither the trustee nor the bondholders will have the right to accelerate payments on the securitized utility tariff bonds as a result of a breach under the sale agreement or servicing agreement, absent an event of default under the indenture relating to the securitized utility tariff bonds as described under “Description of the Securitized Utility Tariff Bonds—Events of Default; Rights Upon Event of Default” in this prospectus. Furthermore, Evergy Missouri West might not have sufficient funds available to satisfy its indemnification obligations under these agreements, and the amount of any indemnification paid by Evergy Missouri West might not be sufficient for you to recover all of your investment in the securitized utility tariff bonds. In addition, if Evergy Missouri West becomes obligated to indemnify bondholders, the then-current ratings on the securitized utility tariff bonds will likely be downgraded as a result of the circumstances causing the breach and the fact that bondholders will be unsecured creditors of Evergy Missouri West with respect to any of these indemnification amounts. Evergy Missouri West will not indemnify any person for any loss, damages, liability, obligation, claim, action, suit or payment resulting solely from a downgrade in the ratings on the securitized utility tariff bonds, or for any consequential damages, including any loss of market value of the securitized utility tariff bonds resulting from a default or a downgrade of the ratings of the securitized utility tariff bonds. Please read “The Sale Agreement—Seller Representations and Warranties” and “The Sale Agreement—Indemnification” in this prospectus.

The issuing entity will issue several tranches of the securitized utility tariff bonds.

The financing order authorizes the issuing entity to issue one or more tranches of the securitized utility tariff bonds not to exceed the Authorized Amount (as defined under “Evergy Missouri West’s Financing Order”). Securitized utility tariff charges collected by or for the benefit of Evergy Missouri West will be allocated among the tranches of securitized utility tariff bonds as set forth in the expected sinking fund schedule and the priority of payments set forth under “Security for the Securitized Utility Tariff Bonds—How Funds in the Collection Account will be Allocated” in this prospectus. However, the issuing entity cannot assure you that the existence of multiple tranches of securitized utility tariff bonds would not cause reductions or delays in payment on your securitized utility tariff bonds. In addition, some matters relating to the securitized utility tariff bonds may require the vote of the holders of all tranches of the securitized utility tariff bonds. Your interests in these votes might conflict with the interests of the beneficial owners of securitized utility tariff bonds of another tranche and therefore these votes could result in an outcome that is materially unfavorable to you.

Evergy Missouri West may in its sole discretion sell securitized utility tariff property or property similar to the securitized utility tariff property, created by a separate financing order to one or more entities other than the issuing entity in connection with the issuance of additional securitized utility tariff bonds or obligations similar to the securitized utility tariff bonds without your prior review or approval.

Any new issuance would be offered pursuant to a separate registration statement and may include terms and provisions that would be unique to that particular issuance. Evergy Missouri West has covenanted in the sale agreement that the satisfaction of the rating agency condition and the execution and delivery of a joinder to the intercreditor agreement are condition precedents to the sale of additional securitized utility tariff property consisting of non-bypassable charges payable by customers comparable to the securitized utility tariff property to another entity. Please read “Security for the Securitized Utility Tariff Bonds—Intercreditor Agreement” and “Sale Agreement—Covenants of the Seller” in this prospectus.

 

30


Table of Contents

In the event a customer does not pay in full all amounts owed under any bill, including securitized utility tariff charges, Evergy Missouri West, as servicer, is required to prorate among charge categories in proportion to their percentage of the overall bill, with the first dollars collected attributed to past due balances, if any. However, if a dispute arises with respect to the allocation of such securitized utility tariff charges or other delays occur on account of the administrative burdens of making such allocation, the issuing entity cannot assure you that any new issuance would not cause reductions or delays in payment of your securitized utility tariff bonds.

The credit ratings are no indication of the expected rate of payment of principal on the securitized utility tariff bonds.

The issuing entity expects the securitized utility tariff bonds will receive credit ratings from at least two nationally recognized statistical rating organizations (“NRSRO”). A rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold the securitized utility tariff bonds. The ratings merely analyze the probability that the issuing entity will repay the total principal amount of the securitized utility tariff bonds at the final maturity date (which is later than the scheduled final payment date) and will make timely interest payments. The ratings are not an indication that the rating agencies believe that principal payments are likely to be paid on time according to the expected sinking fund schedule.

Under Rule 17g-5 of the Exchange Act, NRSROs providing the sponsor with the requisite certification will have access to all information posted on a website by the sponsor for the purpose of determining the initial rating and monitoring the rating after the closing date in respect of the securitized utility tariff bonds. As a result, an NRSRO other than a NRSRO hired by the sponsor (a “hired NRSRO”) may issue ratings on the securitized utility tariff bonds (“unsolicited ratings”), which may be lower, and could be significantly lower, than the ratings assigned by the hired NRSROs. The unsolicited ratings may be issued prior to, or after, the closing date in respect of the securitized utility tariff bonds. Issuance of any unsolicited rating will not affect the issuance of the securitized utility tariff bonds. Issuance of an unsolicited rating lower than the ratings assigned by the hired NRSRO on the securitized utility tariff bonds might adversely affect the value of the securitized utility tariff bonds and, for regulated entities, could affect the status of the securitized utility tariff bonds as a legal investment or the capital treatment of the securitized utility tariff bonds. Investors in the securitized utility tariff bonds should consult with their legal counsel regarding the effect of the issuance of a rating by a non-hired NRSRO that is lower than the rating of a hired NRSRO. None of Evergy Missouri West, the issuing entity, the underwriters or any of their affiliates will have any obligation to inform you of any unsolicited ratings assigned after the date of this prospectus. In addition, if either the issuing entity or Evergy Missouri West fail to make available to a non-hired NRSRO any information provided to any hired rating agency for the purpose of assigning or monitoring the ratings on the securitized utility tariff bonds, a hired NRSRO could withdraw its ratings on the securitized utility tariff bonds, which could adversely affect the market value of your securitized utility tariff bonds and/or limit your ability to resell your securitized utility tariff bonds.

The securitized utility tariff bonds’ credit ratings might affect the market value of your securitized utility tariff bonds.

A downgrading of the credit ratings of the securitized utility tariff bonds might have an adverse effect on the market value of the securitized utility tariff bonds. Credit ratings might change at any time and an NRSRO has the authority to revise or withdraw its rating based solely upon its own judgment. In addition, any downgrade in the credit ratings of the securitized utility tariff bonds may result in the securitized utility tariff bonds becoming ineligible to be held by certain funds or investors, which may require such investors to liquidate their investment in the securitized utility tariff bonds and result in lower prices and a less liquid trading market for the securitized utility tariff bonds.

The absence of a secondary market for the securitized utility tariff bonds might limit your ability to resell your securitized utility tariff bonds.

The underwriters for the securitized utility tariff bonds might assist in resales of the securitized utility tariff bonds, but they are not required to do so. A secondary market for the securitized utility tariff bonds might not develop, and the issuing entity does not expect to list the securitized utility tariff bonds on any securities exchange. If a secondary market does develop, it might not continue or it might not be sufficiently liquid to allow you to resell any of your securitized utility tariff bonds. Please read “Plan of Distribution” in this prospectus.

 

31


Table of Contents

You might receive principal payments for the securitized utility tariff bonds later than you expect.

The amount and the rate of collection of the securitized utility tariff charges for the securitized utility tariff bonds, together with the related securitized utility tariff charge adjustments, will generally determine whether there is a delay in the scheduled repayments of securitized utility tariff bond principal. A failure to pay principal as anticipated by the scheduled bond repayment schedule will not constitute an event of default under the indenture.

Regulatory provisions affecting certain investors could adversely affect the price and liquidity of the securitized utility tariff bonds.

European Union (“EU”) legislation comprising Regulation (EU) 2017/2402 of 12 December 2017 (as amended, the “EU Securitization Regulation”) together with any guidance published in relation thereto by the European Banking Authority, the European Securities and Markets Authority, the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority or the European Commission and any relevant regulatory and/or implementing technical standards adopted by the European Commission in relation thereto or to precedent legislation (together, the “European Securitization Rules”) imposes certain restrictions and obligations with regard to securitisations (as such term is defined for purposes of the EU Securitization Regulation). The European Securitization Rules are in force throughout the EU in respect of securitisations the securities of which were issued (or the securitisation positions of which were created) on or after January 1, 2019.

Pursuant to Article 5 of the European Securitization Rules, EU Institutional Investors, prior to investing in, (or otherwise holding an exposure to) a securitisation (as so defined) other than the originator, sponsor or original lender (each as defined in the EU Securitization Regulation), must, amongst other things, (a) where the originator or original lender is established in a third country (that is, not within the EU or the EEA), verify that the originator or original lender grants all the credits giving rise to the underlying exposures on the basis of sound and well-defined criteria and clearly established processes for approving, amending, renewing and financing those credits and has effective systems in place to apply those criteria and processes to ensure that credit-granting is based on a thorough assessment of the obligor’s creditworthiness, (b) verify that the originator, sponsor or original lender retains on an ongoing basis a material net economic interest which, in any event, shall not be less than 5% in the securitisation, determined in accordance with Article 6 of the EU Securitization Regulation, and discloses that risk retention to such EU Institutional Investors in accordance with Article 7 of the EU Securitization Regulation, and (c) verify that the originator, sponsor or relevant securitisation special purpose entity (“SSPE”) has, where applicable, made available information as required by Article 7 of the EU Securitization Regulation in accordance with the frequency and modalities provided for in that Article (which sets out transparency requirements for originators, sponsors and SSPEs), and (d) carry out a due-diligence assessment which enables the institutional investor to assess the risks involved, considering at least (i) the risk characteristics of the securitisation position and the underlying exposures, and (ii) all the structural features of the securitisation that can materially impact the performance of the securitisation position. “EU Institutional Investors include: (a) insurance undertakings and reinsurance undertakings as defined in Directive 2009/138/EC, as amended; (b) institutions for occupational retirement provision falling within the scope of Directive (EU) 2016/2341 (subject to certain exceptions), and certain investment managers and authorized entities appointed by such institutions; (c) alternative investment fund managers as defined in Directive 2011/61/EU which manage and/or market alternative investment funds in the EU; (d) certain internally-managed investment companies authorized in accordance with Directive 2009/65/EC, and managing companies as defined in that Directive; (e) credit institutions as defined in Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (“CRR”) (and certain consolidated affiliates thereof); and (f) investment firms as defined in CRR (and certain consolidated affiliates thereof).

With respect to the United Kingdom (“UK”), relevant UK established or UK regulated persons (as described below) are subject to the restrictions and obligations of the EU Securitization Regulation directly applicable in the UK adopted as part of UK domestic law by operation of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 as amended by the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2020 (as amended, the “EUWA”), and as amended by the Securitisation (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019 (together with the EUWA, the “EU Exit Regulations”), (the “UK Securitization Regulation”) and as further amended from time to time.

 

32


Table of Contents

The UK Securitization Regulation, together with (a) all applicable binding secondary legislation, technical standards or implementing technical standards made under the UK Securitization Regulation (in each case, as amended, varied or substituted from time to time), (b) any EU regulatory technical standards or implementing technical standards relating to the EU Securitization Regulation (including such regulatory technical standards or implementing technical standards) that are applicable and binding in the UK pursuant to EU Exit Regulations and subject to any transitional directions from the Financial Conduct Authority (the “FCA”), (c) all relevant guidance, policy statements or directions relating to the application of the UK Securitization Regulation (or any binding technical standards) published by the FCA, the Bank of England, the UK pensions regulator (the “Pensions Regulator”) and/or the Prudential Regulation Authority (the “PRA”) or any other UK regulator (or their successors), (d), any other transitional direction and any transitional relief of the FCA, the Bank of England, the PRA, the Pensions Regulator (or their successors) and (e) any other applicable laws, acts, statutory instruments, rules, guidance or policy statements published or enacted relating to the UK Securitization Regulation, in each case, as may be further amended, supplemented or replaced, from time to time, are referred to in this prospectus as the “UK Securitization Rules”.

Article 5 of the UK Securitization Regulation places certain conditions on investments in a “securitisation” (as defined in the UK Securitization Regulation) by a UK Institutional Investor. “UK Institutional Investors include: (a) an insurance undertaking as defined in section 417(1) of the Financial Services And Markets Act 2000 (as amended, the “FSMA”); (b) a reinsurance undertaking as defined in section 417(1) of the FSMA; (c) an occupational pension scheme as defined in section 1(1) of the Pension Schemes Act 1993 that has its main administration in the UK, or a fund manager of such a scheme appointed under section 34(2) of the Pensions Act 1995 that, in respect of activity undertaken pursuant to that appointment, is authorized for the purposes of section 31 of the FSMA; (d) an alternative investment fund manager as defined in regulation 4(1) of the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Regulation 2013 that markets or manages alternative investments funds (as defined in regulation 3 of the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Regulation 2013) in the UK; (e) a management company as defined in section 237(2) of the FSMA; (f) an undertaking for collective investment in transferable securities as defined by section 236A of the FSMA, which is an authorized open ended investment company as defined in section 237(3) of the FSMA; and (g) a CRR firm as defined in Regulation (EU) No 575/2013, as it forms part of UK domestic law by virtue of the EU Exit Regulations (and certain consolidated affiliates thereof).

Prior to investing in (or otherwise holding an exposure to) a “securitisation position” (as defined in the UK Securitization Regulation), a UK Institutional Investor, other than the originator, sponsor or original lender (each as defined in the UK Securitization Regulation), must, among other things: (a) verify that, where the originator or original lender is established in a third country (i.e. not within the UK), the originator or original lender grants all the credits giving rise to the underlying exposures on the basis of sound and well-defined criteria and clearly established processes for approving, amending, renewing and financing those credits and has effective systems in place to apply those criteria and processes to ensure that credit-granting is based on a thorough assessment of the obligor’s creditworthiness; (b) verify that, if established in the third country (i.e. not within the UK), the originator, sponsor or original lender retains on an ongoing basis a material net economic interest that, in any event, shall not be less than 5%, determined in accordance with Article 6 of the UK Securitization Regulation, and discloses the risk retention to the affected UK Institutional Investors; (c) verify that, where established in a third country (i.e. not within the UK), the originator, sponsor or relevant securitisation special purpose entity, where applicable, made available information that is substantially the same as that which it would have made available under Article 7 of the UK Securitization Regulation (which sets out certain transparency requirements) if it had been established in the UK and has done so with such frequency and modalities as are substantially the same as those with which it would have made information available if it had been established in the UK; and (d) carry out a due-diligence assessment that enables the UK Institutional Investor to assess the risks involved, considering at least (i) the risk characteristics of the securitisation position and the underlying exposures and (ii) all the structural features of the securitisation that can materially impact the performance of the securitisation position.

The issuing entity and Evergy Missouri West do not believe that the securitized utility tariff bonds fall within the definition of a “securitisation” for purposes of the EU Securitization Regulation or the UK Securitization Regulation as there is no tranching of credit risk associated with exposures under the transactions described in this prospectus.

 

33


Table of Contents

Therefore, the issuing entity and Evergy Missouri West believe such transactions are not subject to the European Securitization Rules or the UK Securitization Rules. As such, neither the issuing entity nor Evergy Missouri West, nor any other party to the transactions described in this prospectus, intend, or are required under the transaction documents, to retain a material net economic interest in respect of such transactions, or to take, or to refrain from taking, any other action, in a manner prescribed or contemplated by the European Securitization Rules or the UK Securitization Rules. In particular, no such Person undertakes to take, or to refrain from taking, any action for purposes of compliance by any investor (or any other Person) with any requirement of the European Securitization Rules or the UK Securitization Rules to which such investor (or other Person) may be subject at any time.

However, if a competent authority were to take a contrary view and determine that the transactions described in this prospectus do constitute a securitisation for purposes of the EU Securitization Regulation or the UK Securitization Regulation, then any failure by an EU Institutional Investor or a UK Institutional Investor (as applicable) to comply with any applicable European Securitization Rules or UK Securitization Rules (as applicable) with respect to an investment in the securitized utility tariff bonds may result in the imposition of a penalty regulatory capital charge on that investment or of other regulatory sanctions and remedial measures.

Consequently, the securitized utility tariff bonds may not be a suitable investment for EU Institutional Investors or UK Institutional Investors. As a result, the price and liquidity of the securitized utility tariff bonds in the secondary market may be adversely affected.

Prospective investors are responsible for analyzing their own legal and regulatory position and are advised to consult with their own advisors and any relevant regulator or other authority regarding the scope, applicability and compliance requirements of the European Securitization Rules and the UK Securitization Rules, and the suitability of the securitized utility tariff bonds for investment. Neither the issuing entity nor Evergy Missouri West, nor any other party to the transactions described in this prospectus, make any representation as to any such matter, or have any liability to any investor (or any other Person) for any non-compliance by any such Person with the European Securitization Rules, the UK Securitization Rules or any other applicable legal, regulatory or other requirements.

If the investment of collected securitized utility tariff charges and other funds held by the trustee in the collection account results in investment losses or the investments become illiquid, you may receive payment of principal and interest on the securitized utility tariff bonds later than you expect.

Funds held by the trustee in the collection account will be invested in eligible investments at the written direction of the servicer. Eligible investments include money market funds having a rating from Moody’s and S&P of “P-1” and “A-1”, respectively. Although investments in these money market funds have traditionally been viewed as highly liquid with a low probability of principal loss, illiquidity and principal losses have been experienced by investors in certain of these funds as a result of disruptions in the financial markets in recent years. If investment losses or illiquidity is experienced, you might experience a delay in payments of principal and interest and a decrease in the value of your investment in the securitized utility tariff bonds.

 

34


Table of Contents

REVIEW OF SECURITIZED UTILITY TARIFF PROPERTY

Pursuant to the rules of the SEC, Evergy Missouri West, as sponsor, has performed, as described below, a review of the securitized utility tariff property underlying the securitized utility tariff bonds. As required by these rules, the review was designed and effected to provide reasonable assurance that disclosure regarding the securitized utility tariff property is accurate in all material respects. Evergy Missouri West did not engage a third party in conducting its review.

The securitized utility tariff bonds will be secured under the indenture by the indenture’s trust estate. The principal asset of the indenture’s trust estate is the securitized utility tariff property relating to the securitized utility tariff bonds. The securitized utility tariff property includes the right to impose, bill, charge, collect and receive non-bypassable irrevocable securitized utility tariff charges authorized under the financing order in amounts necessary to pay principal on and interest of the securitized utility tariff bonds and ongoing financing costs in connection with the securitized utility tariff bonds and the right to obtain true-up adjustments of securitized utility tariff charges under the Securitization Law and as provided in the financing order (with respect to adjustments, in the manner and with the effect provided in the servicing agreement) and all revenue, collections, claims, right to payments, payments, money and proceeds arising out of the rights and interests specified in the financing order. Under the Securitization Law and the financing order, the securitized utility tariff charges are payable by all existing or future retail customers receiving electrical service from Evergy Missouri West or its successor or assignees under MPSC-approved rate schedules and located within Evergy Missouri West’s service area as such service area existed on the date of the financing order, except Exempted Customers, even if a retail customer elects to purchase electricity from an alternative electricity supplier following a change in regulation of public utilities in Missouri.

The securitized utility tariff property is not a receivable, and the securitized utility tariff property and other collateral held by the trustee securing the securitized utility tariff bonds do not constitute a pool of receivables. Securitized utility tariff charges that relate to the securitized utility tariff property are irrevocable and not subject to reduction, impairment, postponement, termination or, except for the specified true-up adjustments to (a) correct any under collections or overcollections that may have occurred and otherwise ensure that the SPE receives remittances from securitized utility tariff charges that are required to satisfy the total securitized revenue requirement, including without limitation any overcollections or under collections caused by defaults, during the time since the last true-up; and (b) ensure the billing of securitized utility tariff charges necessary to generate the collection of amounts sufficient to timely provide all payments of scheduled principal and interest (or deposits to sinking funds in respect of principal and interest) and any other amounts due in connection with the securitized utility tariff bonds (including ongoing financing costs and amounts required to be deposited in or allocated to any collection account or subaccount) during the period for which such adjusted securitized utility tariff charges are to be in effect. These adjustments are intended to ensure the recovery of revenues sufficient to retire the principal amount of the securitized utility tariff bonds in accordance with the expected sinking fund schedule, to pay all interest on the securitized utility tariff bonds when due, to pay fees and expenses of servicing the securitized utility tariff bonds and premiums, if any, associated with the securitized utility tariff bonds and to fund any required credit enhancement for the securitized utility tariff bonds. In addition to the annual true-up adjustments, the servicer (a) is required to implement quarterly true-up adjustments if there are securitized utility tariff bonds outstanding following the scheduled final payment date of the latest maturing tranche of the securitized utility tariff bonds, (b) is required to implement semi-annual true-up adjustments if the servicer forecasts that securitized utility tariff charge collections will be insufficient to make scheduled payments of principal, interest, and other financing costs on a timely basis, and (c) may request an interim true-up adjustment at any time for any reason to ensure timely payment of scheduled principal of and interest on the securitized utility tariff bonds and other required amounts and charges owing in connection with the securitized utility tariff bonds on the next payment date.

There is no cap on the level of securitized utility tariff charges that may be imposed on customers as a result of the true-up adjustment process to pay principal of and interest on the securitized utility tariff bonds when due and other required amounts and charges owing in connection with the securitized utility tariff bonds. All revenues and collections resulting from securitized utility tariff charges provided for in the financing order are part of the securitized utility tariff property. The securitized utility tariff property relating to the securitized utility tariff bonds is described in more detail under “The Securitized Utility Tariff Property and the Securitization Law” in this prospectus.

 

35


Table of Contents

In the financing order, the MPSC, among other things:

 

   

orders that the securitized utility tariff charges shall be non-bypassable and recovered from existing and future retail customers receiving electrical service from Evergy Missouri West or its successor or assignees and located in Evergy Missouri West’s service area as such service area existed on the date of the financing order, except for Exempted Customers, and that the securitized utility tariff charges shall be imposed on all such customers in accordance with the methodology approved in the financing order;

 

   

orders that the owner of the securitized utility tariff property will be entitled to bill or collect securitized utility tariff charges in an amount sufficient to provide for the timely recovery of the aggregate total securitized revenue requirements (including payment of principal or interest on the securitized utility tariff bonds); and

 

   

finds that the transfer of the securitized utility tariff property to the issuing entity by Evergy Missouri West shall be an absolute transfer and true sale of, and not a pledge of or secured transaction relating to, Evergy Missouri West’s right, title, and interest in, to and under the securitized utility tariff property if the sale agreement expressly state that the sale is a sale or other absolute transfer in accordance with Securitization Law.

Please read “The Securitized Utility Tariff Property and the Securitization Law” and “Evergy Missouri West’s Financing Order” in this prospectus for more information.

The characteristics of securitized utility tariff property are unlike the characteristics of assets underlying mortgage and other commercial asset-based financings because securitized utility tariff property is a creature of statute and state regulatory commission proceedings. Because the nature and characteristics of securitized utility tariff property and many elements of securitized utility tariff bond financings are set forth in and constrained by the Securitization Law and the financing order, Evergy Missouri West, as sponsor, does not select the assets to be pledged as collateral in ways common to many traditional asset-based financings. Moreover, the securitized utility tariff bonds do not contain origination or underwriting elements similar to typical mortgage or other loan transactions involved in other forms of asset-backed securities. The Securitization Law and the financing order require the imposition on, and collection of securitized utility tariff charges from, existing and future retail customers of electricity receiving electrical service from Evergy Missouri West or its successor or assignees and located in Evergy Missouri West’s service area as such service area existed on the date of the financing order, except for Exempted Customers. Please read “The Securitized Utility Tariff Property and the Securitization Law—The Financing Order and the Securitized Utility Tariff Property—Exemptions from Securitized Utility Tariff Charges” in this prospectus. Since securitized utility tariff charges are assessed against all such customers and the true-up mechanism adjusts for the impact of customer defaults, the collectability of the securitized utility tariff charges is not ultimately dependent upon the credit quality of particular Evergy Missouri West customers, as would be the case in the absence of the true-up adjustment.

The review by Evergy Missouri West of the securitized utility tariff property underlying the securitized utility tariff bonds has involved a number of discrete steps and elements as described in more detail below. First, Evergy Missouri West has analyzed and applied the Securitization Law’s requirements for recovering qualified extraordinary costs and approval of the MPSC for the issuance of the financing order and in its proposal with respect to the characteristics of the securitized utility tariff property to be created pursuant to the financing order. In preparing this proposal, Evergy Missouri West worked with its counsel and its structuring advisor in preparing the application for a financing order. Moreover, Evergy Missouri West worked with its counsel and the underwriters in preparing the legal agreements that provide for the terms of the securitized utility tariff bonds and the security for the securitized utility tariff bonds. Evergy Missouri West has analyzed economic issues and practical issues for the scheduled payment of principal of and interest on the securitized utility tariff bonds, including the impact of economic factors, potential for disruptions due to weather or catastrophic events, including the COVID-19 pandemic, and its own forecasts for customer growth as well as the historic accuracy of its prior forecasts.

In light of the unique nature of the securitized utility tariff property, Evergy Missouri West has taken (or prior to the offering of the securitized utility tariff bonds, will take) the following actions in connection with its review of the securitized utility tariff property and the preparation of the disclosure for inclusion in this prospectus describing the securitized utility tariff property, the securitized utility tariff bonds and the proposed securitization:

 

   

reviewed the Securitization Law, other relevant provisions of Missouri statutes and any applicable rules, regulations and orders of the MPSC as they relate to the securitized utility tariff property in connection with the preparation and filing of the application with the MPSC for the approval of the financing order in order to confirm that the application and proposed financing order satisfied applicable statutory and regulatory requirements;

 

36


Table of Contents
   

actively participated in the proceeding before the MPSC relating to the approval of the requested financing order;

 

   

reviewed the financing order and the process by which it was adopted to confirm that the financing order satisfied the requirements of the Securitization Law;

 

   

compared the proposed terms of the securitized utility tariff bonds to the applicable requirements in the Securitization Law, other relevant provisions of Missouri statutes, the financing order and any applicable regulations of the MPSC to confirm that they met such requirements;

 

   

prepared and reviewed the agreements to be entered into in connection with the issuance of the securitized utility tariff bonds and compared such agreements to the applicable requirements in the Securitization Law, other relevant provisions of Missouri statutes, the financing order and any applicable regulations of the MPSC to confirm that they met such requirements;

 

   

reviewed the disclosure in this prospectus regarding the Securitization Law, other relevant provisions of Missouri statutes, the financing order and the agreements to be entered into in connection with the issuance of the securitized utility tariff bonds, and compared such descriptions to the relevant provisions of the Securitization Law, other relevant provisions of Missouri statutes, the financing order and such agreements to confirm the accuracy of such descriptions;

 

   

consulted with legal counsel to assess if there is a basis upon which the bondholders (or the trustee acting on their behalf) could successfully challenge the constitutionality of any legislative action by the State of Missouri (including action by the MPSC or the voters by amendment to the Missouri Constitution) that could repeal or amend the provisions of the Securitization Law in a way that could substantially impair the value of the securitized utility tariff property, or substantially reduce, alter or impair the securitized utility tariff charges;

 

   

reviewed the process and procedures in place for it, as servicer, to perform its obligations under the servicing agreement, including billing, collecting, receiving and posting the securitized utility tariff charges to be provided for under the securitized utility tariff property, forecasting securitized utility tariff charges, and preparing and submitting advice letters for true-up adjustments to the securitized utility tariff charges;

 

   

reviewed the operation of the true-up adjustment mechanism for adjusting securitized utility tariff charge levels to meet the scheduled payments on the securitized utility tariff bonds and in this context took into account its experience with the MPSC; and

 

   

with the assistance of its advisors, prepared financial models in order to set the initial securitized utility tariff charges to be provided for under the securitized utility tariff property at levels sufficient to pay principal of and interest on the securitized utility tariff bonds when due and other required amounts and charges owing in connection with the securitized utility tariff bonds.

In connection with the preparation of such models, Evergy Missouri West:

 

   

reviewed (i) the historical electric consumption and customer growth within its service territory and (ii) forecasts of expected energy sales and customer growth; and

 

   

analyzed the sensitivity of the weighted average life of the securitized utility tariff bonds in relation to variances in actual energy consumption levels and related charge collections from forecasted levels and in relation to the true-up adjustment in order to assess the probability that the weighted average life of the securitized utility tariff bonds may be extended as a result of such variances, and in the context of the operation of the true-up adjustment for adjustment of securitized utility tariff charges to address undercollections or overcollections in light of scheduled payments on the securitized utility tariff bonds to prevent an event of default.

As a result of this review, Evergy Missouri West has concluded that:

 

37


Table of Contents
   

the securitized utility tariff property, the financing order and the agreements to be entered into in connection with the issuance of the securitized utility tariff bonds meet in all material respects the applicable statutory and regulatory requirements;

 

   

the disclosure in this prospectus regarding the Securitization Law, the financing order and the agreements to be entered into in connection with the issuance of the securitized utility tariff bonds is as of its date, accurate in all material respects and fails to omit any material information;

 

   

the servicer has adequate processes and procedures in place to perform its obligations under the servicing agreement;

 

   

securitized utility tariff charge revenues, as adjusted from time to time as provided in the Securitization Law and the financing order, are expected to be sufficient to pay on a timely basis scheduled principal and interest on the securitized utility tariff bonds; and

 

   

the design and scope of Evergy Missouri West’s review of the securitized utility tariff property as described above is effective to provide reasonable assurance that the disclosure regarding the securitized utility tariff property in this prospectus is accurate in all material respects.

 

38


Table of Contents

THE SECURITIZED UTILITY TARIFF PROPERTY AND THE SECURITIZATION LAW

The Securitization Law Generally

The Securitization Law permits electrical corporations to finance qualified extraordinary costs, such as those incurred as a result of Winter Storm Uri, and which are eligible for recovery under the Securitization Law through the issuance of securitized utility tariff bonds pursuant to and supported by an irrevocable financing order issued by the MPSC and permits the MPSC to approve a non-bypassable securitized utility tariff charge on existing and future customers receiving electrical service from the electrical corporation as of the date of the financing order, subject to certain exceptions. Please read “The Financing Order and the Securitized Utility Tariff Property—Exemptions from Securitized Utility Tariff Charges” below and “Evergy Missouri West’s Financing Order” in this prospectus. The Securitization Law authorizes the securitized utility tariff charge to recover: (a) qualified extraordinary costs (also referred to herein as securitized utility tariff costs) and (b) financing costs associated with the securitized utility tariff bonds, including the costs of servicing such securitized utility tariff bonds.

The Securitization Law provides that securitized utility tariff charges are non-bypassable, meaning that they are payable paid by all existing or future retail customers receiving electrical service from the electrical corporation or its successors or assignees under commission-approved rate schedules, except for customers receiving electrical service under special contracts as of August 28, 2021, even if a retail customer elects to purchase electricity from an alternative electricity supplier following a fundamental change in regulation of public utilities in the State of Missouri.

The Financing Order and the Securitized Utility Tariff Property

The Securitization Law contains a number of provisions designed to facilitate the securitization of qualified extraordinary costs, including the following:

The Securitization Law Provides for the Creation of Securitized Utility Tariff Property

The Securitization Law authorizes the MPSC, through issuance of a financing order, to provide for the creation of securitized utility tariff property to secure repayment of securitized utility tariff bonds. Securitized utility tariff property is defined under the Securitization Law to include, without limitation, the right, title, and interest of the electrical corporation or its transferee:

 

   

all rights and interests of an electrical corporation or successor or assignee of the electrical corporation under a financing order, including the right to impose, bill, charge, collect, and receive securitized utility tariff charges authorized under the financing order and to obtain periodic adjustments to such charges as provided in the financing order; and

 

   

all revenues, collections, claims, rights to payments, payments, money, or proceeds arising from the rights and interests specified in the financing order described in the bullet point immediately above, regardless of whether such revenues, collections, claims, rights to payment, payments, money, or proceeds are imposed, billed, received, collected, or maintained together with or commingled with other revenues, collections, rights to payment, payments, money, or proceeds.

The Securitization Law provides that securitized utility tariff property that is specified in a financing order shall constitute an existing, present intangible property right or interest therein notwithstanding that the imposition and collection of securitized utility tariff charges depends on the electrical corporation performing its servicing functions relating to the collection of securitized utility tariff charges and on future electricity consumption. The Securitization Law provides that securitized utility tariff property shall exist regardless of whether or not the revenues or proceeds arising from the securitized utility tariff property have been billed, have accrued, or have been collected and notwithstanding the fact that the value or amount of the securitized utility tariff property is dependent on the future provision of service to customers and the future consumption of electricity by customers. The Securitization Law further provides that all securitized utility tariff property specified in a financing order shall continue to exist until the securitized utility tariff bonds issued pursuant to a financing order are paid in full and all associated financing costs and other costs of such securitized utility tariff bonds have been recovered in full.

 

39


Table of Contents

A Financing Order is Irrevocable

The Securitization Law provides that the financing order shall be irrevocable at the time of the transfer of securitized utility tariff property to an assignee or the issuance of securitized utility tariff bonds, whichever is earlier. In addition, under the Securitization Law, the MPSC may not, except as contemplated by the true-up adjustment, amend, modify, or terminate the financing order by any subsequent action or reduce, impair, postpone, terminate, or otherwise adjust securitized utility tariff charges approved in the financing order.

Securitized Utility Tariff Charges May Be Adjusted

The Securitization Law requires the MPSC to include in any financing order, a formula-based true-up mechanism for making, at least annually, expeditious periodic adjustments in the securitized utility tariff charges. The financing order approved the true-up adjustment to implement any true-up adjustment to (a) correct any under collections or overcollections that may have occurred and otherwise ensure that the SPE receives remittances from securitized utility tariff charges that are required to satisfy the total securitized revenue requirement, including without limitation any overcollections or under collections caused by defaults, during the time since the last true-up; and (b) ensure the billing of securitized utility tariff charges necessary to generate the collection of amounts sufficient to timely provide all payments of scheduled principal and interest (or deposits to sinking funds in respect of principal and interest) and any other amounts due in connection with the securitized utility tariff bonds (including ongoing financing costs and amounts required to be deposited in or allocated to any collection account or subaccount) during the period for which such adjusted securitized utility tariff charges are to be in effect. Please read “Evergy Missouri West’s Financing Order—Securitized Utility Tariff Charges—The Financing Order Requires the Servicer to Periodically ‘True-Up’ the Securitized Utility Tariff Charge” and “The Servicing Agreement—True-Up Adjustment Submissions” in this prospectus. Under the Securitization Law and the financing order, there is no cap on the level of securitized utility tariff charges that may be imposed on customers as a result of the true-up adjustment process to pay principal of and interest on the securitized utility tariff bonds when due and other ongoing financing costs in connection with the securitized utility tariff bonds.

The Securitization Law Provides for the Creation of Consensual Liens on Securitized Utility Tariff Property

The Securitization Law provides that consensual security interests can be granted in securitized utility tariff property. The Securitization Law provides that a security interest in securitized utility tariff property is created, valid and binding at the later of the time when (a) the MPSC has issued the related financing order, (b) a security agreement is executed and delivered by the debtor granting such security interest, (c) the debtor has rights in the securitized utility tariff property or the power to transfer such securitized utility tariff property, or (d) value is received for the securitized utility tariff property. A security interest will be attached as provided in the foregoing sentence without any physical delivery or collateral or other act. The security interest in the securitized utility tariff property is perfected when it has attached and when a financing statement has been filed with the Missouri Secretary of State in accordance with the Securitization Law.

Under the Securitization Law, if a default occurs under the terms of the securitized utility tariff bonds secured by a security interest in the securitized utility tariff property, the financing parties of the securitized utility tariff bonds (such as the trustee) may exercise the rights and remedies available to a secured party under the code. In addition, in the event of default by the electrical corporation in any required remittance of securitized utility tariff charges, a court, upon application by an interested party, and without limiting any other remedies available to the applying party, will order the sequestration and payment of the revenues arising from the securitized utility tariff property to the financing parties or their assignees. The Securitization Law provides that any such order shall remain in full force and effect notwithstanding any bankruptcy, reorganization, or other insolvency proceedings with respect to the debtor, pledgor, or transferor of the securitized utility tariff property. Please read “Risk Factors—Risks Associated with the Unusual Nature of the Securitized Utility Tariff Property—Foreclosure of the trustee’s lien on the securitized utility tariff property for the securitized utility tariff bonds might not be practical, and acceleration of the securitized utility tariff bonds before maturity might have little practical effect” in this prospectus.

 

40


Table of Contents

The Securitization Law and the Financing Order Provide that the Transfer of Securitized Utility Tariff Property is a True Sale

The Securitization Law and the financing order provide that an electrical corporation’s transfer of securitized utility tariff property is an absolute transfer of all and true sale of, and not a pledge or secured transaction relating to, the transferor’s right, title, and interest to and under the securitized utility tariff property if the documents governing the transaction expressly state that the transaction is a sale or other absolute transfer other than for federal and state income tax purposes. The Securitization Law provides that the characterization of the sale, assignment, or transfer as an absolute transfer and true sale is not affected or impaired by:

 

   

commingling of securitized utility tariff charges with other amounts;

 

   

the retention by the seller of either of the following:

 

   

a partial or residual interest, including an equity interest, including an equity interest, in the securitized utility tariff property, whether direct or indirect, subordinate or otherwise; or

 

   

the right to recover costs associated with taxes, franchise fees, or license fees imposed on the collection of securitized utility tariff charges;

 

   

any recourse that the purchaser may have against the seller;

 

   

any indemnification rights, obligations, or repurchase rights made or provided by the seller;

 

   

the obligation of the seller to collect securitized utility tariff charges on behalf of an assignee;

 

   

the transferor acting as servicer of the securitized utility tariff charges;

 

   

the treatment of the sale, conveyance, assignment, or transfer for tax, financial reporting, or other purposes;

 

   

the granting or providing to bondholders a preferred right to the securitized utility tariff property; or

 

   

any application of the true-up adjustment of the securitized utility tariff charges as provided in the Securitization Law.

Please read “Risk Factors—Risks Associated with Potential Bankruptcy Proceedings of the Seller or the Servicer” and “How A Bankruptcy May Affect Your Investment” in this prospectus.

A sale or similar outright transfer of an interest in securitized utility tariff property may occur only when all of the following have occurred:

 

   

the financing order creating the securitized utility tariff property has become effective;

 

   

the documents evidencing the transfer of securitized utility tariff property have been executed by the assignor and delivered to the assignee; and

 

   

value is received for the securitized utility tariff property.

After such a transaction, the securitized utility tariff property is not subject to any claims of the transferor or the transferor’s creditors, other than creditors holding a prior security interest in the securitized utility tariff property perfected in accordance with the Securitization Law.

The Securitization Law Requires the Electrical Corporation and its Successors to Service the Securitized Utility Tariff Property

The Securitization Law requires the MPSC to authorize the electrical corporation to enter into a servicing contract with the issuer of the securitized utility tariff bonds (i.e., the issuing entity) in connection with a sale, assignment or pledge of the securitized utility tariff property to such issuing entity. This contract must require the electrical utility to continue to operate its system to provide service to customers within its service territory, to collect amounts in respect of the securitized utility tariff charges for the benefit and account of the issuing entity and to account for and remit these amounts to or for the account of the issuing entity. The Securitization Law further provides to the extent that billing, collection, and other related services with respect to the provision of electric service are provided to a customer by any person or entity other than the electrical corporation in whose service territory the customer is located, that person or entity must collect the securitized utility tariff charges from the customer for the benefit and account of the applicable issuing entity as a condition to the provision of electric service to that customer.

 

41


Table of Contents

The Securitization Law further provides that any successor to the electrical corporation, whether pursuant to any bankruptcy, reorganization, or other insolvency proceeding, or pursuant to any merger or acquisition, sale or other business combination, or other transfer, by operation of law, must perform and satisfy all obligations of, and have the same rights under a financing order as, the electrical corporation under the financing order in the same manner and to the same extent as the electrical corporation, including collecting and paying to the person entitled to receive the revenues, collections, payments, or proceeds of the securitized utility tariff property. Please read “The Servicing Agreement—Successor Servicer” in this prospectus.

State Pledge

Under the Securitization Law, the State of Missouri and its agencies, including the MPSC, pledge and agree with holders, the owners of the securitized utility tariff property, and other financing parties that the state and its agencies will not: (a) alter the provisions of the Securitization Law, which authorize the MPSC to create an irrevocable contract right or chose in action by the issuance of a financing order, to create securitized utility tariff property, and make the securitized utility tariff charges imposed by a financing order irrevocable, binding, or nonbypassable charges for all existing and future retail customers of Evergy Missouri West except its exempted customers; (b) take or permit any action that impairs or would impair the value of securitized utility tariff property or the security for the bonds or revises the securitized utility tariff costs for which recovery is authorized under the financing order; (c) in any way impair the rights and remedies of the holders, assignees, and other financing parties; or (d) except for changes made pursuant to the true-up adjustment, reduce, alter, or impair securitized utility tariff charges that are to be imposed, billed, charged, collected, and remitted for the benefit of the holders, any assignee, and any other financing parties until any and all principal, interest, premium, financing costs and other fees, expenses, or charges incurred, and any contracts to be performed, in connection with the bonds have been paid and performed in full.

The State Pledge does not preclude limitation or alteration if full compensation is made by law for the full protection of the securitized utility tariff charges collected pursuant to a financing order and of the holders and any assignee or financing party entering into a contract with Evergy Missouri West.

Constitutional Matters

To date, no federal or Missouri cases addressing the repeal or amendment of statutory provisions analogous to those contained in the Securitization Law have been decided. There have been cases in which courts applied the Contract Clause of the United States Constitution to strike down legislation regarding similar matters, such as legislation reducing or eliminating taxes, public charges or other sources of revenues servicing other types of securitized utility tariff bonds issued by public instrumentalities or private issuers (or issuing entities), or otherwise substantially impairing or eliminating the security for securitized utility tariff bonds or other indebtedness. Based upon this case law, Hunton expects to deliver a reasoned opinion (the “Hunton Opinion”) prior to the closing of the offering of the securitized utility tariff bonds. Subject to Hunton’s research and analysis on the subject, as well as the assumptions stated therein, the Hunton Opinion will state to the effect that a reviewing court of competent jurisdiction, in a properly prepared and presented case, would conclude that the State Pledge constitutes a contractual relationship between the bondholders and the State of Missouri, and that, absent a demonstration by the State of Missouri that any legislative action that becomes law that alters, impairs or reduces the value of the securitized utility tariff property or the securitized utility tariff charges (such action being referred to as a “legislative action”) so as to impair (a) the terms of the indenture or the securitized utility tariff bonds or (b) the rights and remedies of the bondholders (or the trustee acting on their behalf) (each such act, an “impairment”), is necessary to further a significant and legitimate public purpose, and upon a finding by the court that an evident and more moderate course would serve the State’s purposes equally well, the bondholders could successfully challenge under the Federal Contract Clause the constitutionality of any legislative action that causes an impairment prior to the time that the securitized utility tariff bonds are fully paid and discharged. The relevant case law also indicates that the State’s justification would be subjected to a higher degree of scrutiny, and that the State would bear a more substantial burden, if the legislative action impairs a contract to which the State is a party (which the depositor believes to be the case here), as contrasted to a contract solely between private parties. Based upon this case law, Dentons expects to deliver an opinion (the “Dentons Opinion”) substantially to the same effect under the Contract Clause of the Missouri Constitution. It may be possible for the Missouri legislature to repeal or amend the Securitization Law or for the

 

42


Table of Contents

MPSC to amend or revoke the financing order notwithstanding the State Pledge, if the legislature or the MPSC acts in order to serve a significant and legitimate public purpose, such as protecting the public health and safety or responding to a national or regional catastrophe affecting Evergy Missouri West, or if the legislature otherwise acts in the valid exercise of the State’s police power. The issuing entity will file a copy of the Hunton Opinion and the Dentons Opinion as exhibits to an amendment to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part, or to one of the issuing entity’s periodic filings with the SEC.

In addition, any legislative action of the Missouri legislature adversely affecting the securitized utility tariff property or the ability to collect securitized utility tariff charges may be considered a “taking” under the United States Constitution. Each of Hunton and Dentons has advised the issuing entity that they are not aware of any federal court cases addressing the applicability of the Takings Clause of the United States Constitution in a situation analogous to that which would be involved in an amendment or repeal of the Securitization Law. Hunton expects to render a reasoned opinion, prior to the closing of the offering of the securitized utility tariff bonds, to the effect that under existing case law, assuming a Takings Clause analysis were applied under the United States Constitution, there are sufficient legal grounds for a court to require the State of Missouri to pay just compensation to the bondholders if the State’s repeal or amendment of the Securitization Law or taking of any other action in contravention of the State Pledge, (a) constituted a permanent appropriation of a substantial property interest of the bondholders in the securitized utility tariff property or denied all economically productive use of the securitized utility tariff property; (b) destroyed the securitized utility tariff property other than in response to emergency conditions; or (c) substantially reduced, altered or impaired the value of the securitized utility tariff property so as to unduly interfere with the reasonable expectations of the bondholders arising from their investments in the securitized utility tariff bonds. In addition, Dentons expects to deliver an opinion substantially to the same effect under the Takings Clause of the Missouri Constitution. In examining whether action of the Missouri legislature amounts to a taking, both U.S. federal and Missouri state courts will consider the character of the governmental action and whether such action substantially advances the legitimate governmental interests of the State of Missouri, the economic impact of the governmental action on the bondholders and the extent to which the governmental action interferes with distinct investment-backed expectations. There is no assurance, however, that, even if a court were to award just compensation, it would be sufficient for you to recover fully your investment in the securitized utility tariff bonds.

In connection with the foregoing, each of Hunton and Dentons will advise the issuing entity that issues relating to the Contract and Takings Clauses of the United States and Missouri Constitutions are decided on a case-by-case basis and that courts’ determinations, in most cases, are strongly influenced by the facts and circumstances of the particular case, and both firms will further advise the issuing entity that there are no reported controlling judicial precedents that are directly on point. The Hunton and Dentons Opinions described above will be subject to the qualifications included in them.

The degree of impairment necessary to meet the standards for relief under a Takings Clause analysis or Contract Clause analysis could be substantially in excess of what a bondholder would consider material.

For a discussion of risks associated with potential judicial, legislation or regulatory actions, please read “Risk Factors—Risks Associated with Potential Judicial, Legislative or Regulatory Actions” in this prospectus.

Exemptions from Securitized Utility Tariff Charges

Under the Securitization Law, customers receiving electrical service from Evergy Missouri West under special contracts as of August 28, 2021 are exempted from payment of fixed recovery charges. There is currently one customer who will be exempt from the securitized utility tariff charges See “Evergy Missouri West’s Financing Order” in this prospectus.

 

43


Table of Contents

EVERGY MISSOURI WEST’S FINANCING ORDER

Evergy Missouri West’s Financing Order

On March 11, 2022, Evergy Missouri West submitted a petition for a financing order to the MPSC, seeking authority to recover approximately $357 million of qualified extraordinary costs incurred by Evergy Missouri West during the February 2021 cold whether event know as Winter Storm Uri. On October 7, 2022, the MPSC issued its financing order which authorizes Evergy Missouri West to issue a series securitized utility tariff bonds to recover approximately $308 million of extraordinary costs, plus upfront financing costs (the “Authorized Amount”). The MPSC issued the Amended Report and Order on November 17, 2022, which became effective November 27, 2022.

The financing order, pursuant to the provisions of the Securitization Law, is irrevocable and, except as contemplated by the periodic true-up adjustments, the MPSC may not amend, modify, or terminate the financing order by any subsequent action or reduce, impair, postpone, terminate or otherwise adjust securitized utility tariff charges approved in the financing order.

The issuing entity has filed the financing order with the SEC as an exhibit to the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part. The depositor summarized portions of the financing order below.

Securitized Utility Tariff Charges

The Financing Order Requires the Imposition and Collection of Securitized Utility Tariff Charges

Pursuant to the financing order, except for Exempted Customers, the securitized utility tariff charge will be assessed to all customers at an equal cent per kWh charge that is adjusted for line losses determined for each voltage level class. Such securitized utility tariff charges will be in amounts sufficient to retire the principal amount of the securitized utility tariff bonds in accordance with the expected sinking fund schedule, to pay all interest on the securitized utility tariff bonds when due, and to pay all ongoing financing costs relating to the securitized utility tariff bonds (“ongoing financing costs”). Under the financing order, there is no limit on the amount of the securitized utility tariff charge.

The Financing Order Provides that Securitized Utility Tariff Charges are Non-bypassable

As required by the Securitization Law, the financing order provides that the securitized utility tariff charges are “non-bypassable” and must be paid by all existing and future customers receiving electrical service from Evergy Missouri West or its successor or assignees and located within Evergy Missouri West’s service area as it existed on the date of the financing order under MPSC-approved rate schedules, except for customers receiving electrical service under special contracts as of August 28, 2021, even if a retail customer elects to purchase electricity from an alternative electricity supplier following a change in regulation of public utilities in State of Missouri. In addition, under the financing order, any existing or future customer may not avoid securitized utility tariff charges by switching to another electrical corporation, electric cooperative, or municipally owned utility on or after the financing order was issued.

The financing order specifies that it is binding on any successor to Evergy Missouri West that provides transmission and distribution service directly to retail customers in Evergy Missouri West’s service area as it existed on the date of the financing order pursuant to the Securitization Law, including collecting and paying to the bondholders revenues arising with respect to the securitized utility tariff property.

In the servicing agreement, Evergy Missouri West will covenant to assert in an appropriate forum that any municipality, or any other person or entity, that acquires any portion of Evergy Missouri West’s electric distribution facilities must be treated as a successor to Evergy Missouri West under the Securitization Law and the financing order, subject to approval by the MPSC, and that its retail customers remain responsible for payment of securitized utility tariff charges. Please read “The Servicing Agreement—Servicing Standards and Covenants” in this prospectus.

The Financing Order Approves the Methodology used to Calculate the Securitized Utility Tariff Charges

The financing order approves the methodology by which the securitized utility tariff charges will be calculated and adjusted from time to time by the servicer pursuant to the issuance advice letter and true-up advice letters submitted to the MPSC as described below.

 

44


Table of Contents

Pursuant to the financing order, except for Exempted Customers, the securitized utility tariff charges will be a levelized charge assessed to all customers adjusted for line losses determined for each voltage level class. Evergy Missouri West has four line loss adjustment factors depending on the voltage level class that are determined in accordance with Evergy Missouri West’s fuel adjust clause rider. The securitized utility tariff charge rates across all voltage level classes are expected to be substantially level with the current difference between the highest securitized utility tariff charge rate and the lowest securitized utility tariff charge rate being approximately 3.1%.

The table below shows the current line loss adjustment factor for each voltage level class.

 

Voltage Level

   Securitized Utility Tariff
Charge Line Loss
Adjustment Factor
     2021 Actual Billed kWh
Breakdown(1)
   

Customer Classes Included

Secondary

     1.0426        87   Residential, Commercial, Industrial, Other

Primary

     1.0268        8   Commercial, Industrial

Substation

     1.0133        4   Commercial, Industrial

Transmission

     1.0100        1   Commercial, Industrial

 

(1)

Excluding Exempted Customers.

The Securitization Law and the financing order provide that the securitized utility tariff charges shall not be imposed on customers receiving electrical service under special contracts on August 28, 2021.

In accordance with the financing order, after the initial implementation of the securitized utility tariff charge, Evergy Missouri West will revise the securitized utility tariff charge rates at least annually to collect the required securitized utility tariff charge revenue based on the then- current sales forecast. Please read “Evergy Missouri West’s Financing Order—Securitized Utility Tariff Charges—The Financing Order Requires the Servicer to Periodically ‘True-Up’ the Securitized Utility Tariff Charge” in this prospectus.

The Financing Order Requires the Servicer to Periodically “True-Up” the Securitized Utility Tariff Charge

The financing order requires that the servicer make periodic expenditure adjustments, at least annually, to the securitized utility tariff charges to ensure the recovery of revenues sufficient to provide for the timely payment of the periodic payment requirement. In addition to the annual true-up adjustment, the servicer is authorized under the financing order to make semi-annual true-up adjustments (or quarterly beginning 12 months prior to the final scheduled payment date of the last tranche of the securitized utility tariff bonds) and interim true-up adjustments at any time (i) if the servicer forecasts that securitized utility tariff charge collections will be insufficient to make all scheduled payments of principal, interest, and other amounts on a timely basis during the current or next succeeding payment period, or (ii) to replenish any draw upon the capital subaccount.

In addition, the financing order permits, and the servicing agreement requires that beginning 12 months prior to the latest maturing tranche of the securitized utility tariff bonds, the servicer must submit quarterly true-up adjustments. Mandatory annual true-up adjustments, semi-annual true-up adjustments, if necessary, interim true-up adjustments, if necessary, and mandatory quarterly true-up adjustments as described above are referred to as “standard true-up adjustments.” Each such standard true-up adjustment shall utilize the methodology described above under the heading “—The Financing Order Approves the Methodology used to Calculate the Securitized Utility Tariff Charges” to determine the securitized utility tariff charges requested on the next adjustment date.

Standard annual true-up adjustment letters, standard semi-annual true-up letters, and standard interim true-up adjustment letters must be submitted not less than 30 days before the billing cycle of the month in which the revised securitized utility tariff charge will be in effect. Each true-up adjustment filing will set forth the servicer’s calculation of the true-up adjustment to the securitized utility tariff charges. Within 30 days after receiving a true-up adjustment filing, the MPSC will either approve the request or inform Evergy Missouri West of any mathematical or clerical errors in its calculation. If the MSPC informs Evergy Missouri West of mathematical or clerical errors in its calculation, Evergy Missouri West will correct its error and refile its request, to which the same time frames described above will apply.

 

45


Table of Contents

The Initial Securitized Utility Tariff Charges

The initial securitized utility tariff charges will be determined and approved by the MPSC as part of the issuance advice letter process described below. Please read “Evergy Missouri West’s Financing Order—Issuance Advice Letter” in this prospectus. The initial securitized utility tariff charge for the securitized utility tariff bonds offered hereby is expected to represent approximately     % of the total electric bill, as of                 , received by a                  kWh residential customer of Evergy Missouri West.

The securitized utility tariff charges will become effective on the date specified in the issuance advice letter, and will be subject to periodic true-up as described above.

Partial Payments of the Securitized Utility Tariff Charges will be Pro-rated

The financing order requires that, if any customer does not pay the full amount it has been billed, the amount collected will first be apportioned ratably between the securitized utility tariff charges and other fees (excluding late fees), and second, any remaining portion of the payment must be allocated to late fees.

Issuance Advice Letter

Not later than one business day after the pricing date of the securitized utility tariff bonds, Evergy Missouri West is required to submit with the MPSC an issuance advice letter, which will:

 

   

specify the total amount of securitized utility tariff costs and financing costs;

 

   

the amount of quantifiable net present value savings;

 

   

confirmation of compliance with issuance standards;

 

   

the actual terms and structure of the securitized utility tariff bonds being issued;

 

   

the initial securitized utility tariff charge for retail customers; and

 

   

identify the issuing entity.

The financing order provides that Evergy Missouri West may proceed with the issuance of the securitized utility tariff bonds unless, before noon on the fourth business day after the MPSC receives the issuance advice letter, the MPSC issues a disapproval letter directing that the securitized utility tariff bonds shall not be issued and the basis for that disapproval.

Servicing Agreement

In the financing order, the MPSC authorized Evergy Missouri West, as the servicer, to enter into the servicing agreement described under “The Servicing Agreement” in this prospectus. The servicing agreement provides that Evergy Missouri West may not resign from its obligations and duties as servicer thereunder, except if (a) Evergy Missouri West determines that the performance of its duties under the servicing agreement is no longer permissible under applicable law or (b) satisfaction of the following: (i) the rating agency condition shall have been satisfied and (ii) the MPSC shall have approved such resignation. No resignation by Evergy Missouri West as servicer will become effective until a successor servicer has assumed Evergy Missouri West’s servicing obligations and duties under the servicing agreement. Please read “The Servicing Agreement—Matters Regarding the Servicer” in this prospectus.

Securitized utility tariff charges will be collected by Evergy Missouri West from customers as part of its normal collection activities. Securitized utility tariff charges will be deposited by Evergy Missouri West into the collection account under the terms of the indenture, the series supplement and the servicing agreement. Estimated securitized utility tariff charge collections will be remitted to the trustee on each business day. The estimated daily remittances made by Evergy Missouri West will use the then-current Weighted Average Days Sales Outstanding and an estimated system-wide write-off percentage. No less often than semi-annually, estimated securitized utility tariff charge collections will be reconciled with actual securitized utility tariff charge collections, based on Weighted Average Days Sales Outstanding and actual system-wide write-off percentage. Please read “The Servicing Agreement—Remittances to Collection Account” in this prospectus.

 

46


Table of Contents

THE DEPOSITOR, SELLER, INITIAL SERVICER AND SPONSOR

General

Evergy Missouri West will be the depositor, seller and initial servicer of the securitized utility tariff property securing the securitized utility tariff bonds, and will be the sponsor of the securitization in which securitized utility tariff bonds covered by this prospectus are issued.

Evergy Missouri West, a Delaware corporation incorporated in 1986 and headquartered in Kansas City, Missouri, is an integrated, regulated electrical corporation engaged in the generation, transmission, distribution and sale of electricity in western Missouri, including the suburban Kansas City metropolitan area, the city of St. Joseph and surrounding counties. Evegry Missouri West is regulated by the MPSC and the FERC.

Evergy Missouri West is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Evergy. Evergy Missouri West provides electric service to approximately 340,000 customers throughout a 13,262 square-mile service area in western Missouri.

During the year ended December 31, 2021, Evergy Missouri West sold or delivered electricity to an average of 336,643 customers and, for the twelve months ended December 31, 2021, its total billed electric operating revenue was derived as follows: 53% Residential; 36% Commercial; 10% Industrial and 1% Other. The securitized utility tariff bonds do not constitute a debt, liability or other legal obligation of Evergy Missouri West or Evergy Missouri.

Evergy Missouri West Retail Customer Base and Electric Energy Consumption

Under the Securitization Law, qualifying special contract rate(s) are exempt from paying the securitized utility tariff charges and the costs associated with these groups is allocated to the remaining customer classes.

The following tables show the electricity delivered to retail customers, electric delivery revenues and number of retail customers for each customer class and each of the four preceding years and year to date ended September 30, 2022. There can be no assurances that the retail electricity sales, retail electric revenues and number of retail customers or the composition of any of the foregoing will remain at or near the levels reflected in the following tables.

Electricity Delivered to Retail Customers, Electric Delivery Revenues and Retail Customers Retail

Electric Usage (As Measured by Billed GWh Sales) by Customer Class

and Percentage Composition(1)

 

Customer Class    2017      2018      2019      2020      2021      Year to Date
September 30,
2022
 

Residential

     3,362        3,802        3,635        3,523        3,650        2,963  

Commercial

     3,230        3,348        3,289        3,078        3,256        2,587  

Industrial(2)

     1,293        1,268        1,239        1,152        1,196        861  

Other

     31        20        19        20        21        15  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

     7,916        8,438        8,182        7,773        8,123        6,426  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

(1)

Amounts may not add up to rounding.

(2)

Excludes sales from Exempted Customers.

 

47


Table of Contents

Revenue by Customer Class (1)

(dollars in thousands)

 

Customer Class    2017      2018      2019      2020      2021      Year to Date
Ended
September

30, 2022
 

Residential

     378,332        424,712        404,913        401,019        409,231        353,489  

Commercial

     287,667        295,268        288,293        265,454        278,137        237,621  

Industrial(2)

     86,816        85,878        83,557        74,703        76,719        64,217  

Other

     7,577        7,806        7,861        8,114        8,122        6,169  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

     760,392        813,664        784,624        749,290        772,209        661,496  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

(1)

Amounts may not add up to rounding.

(2)

Excludes sales from Exempted Customers.

Number of Average Metered Retail Electric Customers (1)

 

Customer Class    2017      2018      2019      2020      2021      Year to
Date
September

30, 2022
 

Residential

     283,563        286,742        288,713        291,923        295,895        298,740  

Commercial

     39,353        39,328        39,220        39,499        40,224        40,695  

Industrial(2)

     248        236        224        222        222        235  

Other

     306        322        307        302        302        301  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

     323,470        326,628        328,464        331,946        336,643        339,971  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

(1)

Amounts may not add up to rounding.

(2)

Excludes sales from Exempted Customers.

Forecasting Electricity Consumption

Evergy Missouri West develops retail electricity sales forecasts each year for financial planning and integrated resource planning, which the latter is filed annually with the MPSC. These updates reflect retail load migration along with other minor changes, and to account for the lingering impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Evergy Missouri West develops statistical adjusted end-use (SAR) econometric models to forecast electricity sales for the residential, commercial, and industrial market segments. These forecasts will be used to calculate the securitized utility tariff charges for any given period, in order to determine the revenue required to meet the principal and interest and other ongoing financing costs for the securitized utility tariff bonds.

For the residential sector, electricity consumption is modeled as a function of population, housing, price, appliance end-use and heating and cooling degree days. The commercial sector is modeled as a function of residential customer growth, price, appliance end-use, gross metro product (GMP) non-manufacturing, and heating and cooling degree days for Evergy Missouri West’s service territory. Electricity usage for the industrial sector is modeled as a function of price, GMP – manufacturing, employment – manufacturing, and cooling degree days. Forecasted weather-related drivers assume normal weather conditions. A rolling thirty-year average for such weather drivers as heating and cooling degree-days are employed in developing the sales forecast.

Evergy Missouri West’s electricity demand forecast models have been in use in their current form for more than five years and have undergone extensive review by the MPSC. Each year Evergy Missouri West updates these models with the most recent recorded data, and conducts testing to ensure that model statistics indicate that drivers are relevant and significant.

The table below shows electricity forecasts and variances from the forecast for the five years 2017-2021 and year to date ended September 30, 2022 and excludes electricity sales from Exempted Customers.

Evergy Missouri West updated its sales forecast model in 2020 to account for the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. Adjustments for COVID-19 are expected to decrease in 2023 and may impact the collection of securitized utility tariff charges.

 

48


Table of Contents

Annual Forecast Variance For Ultimate Electric Delivery (GWh)

 
     2017     2018      2019     2020     2021      Year to Date
September 30,
2022
 

Forecast (1)

     8,074       8,103        8,227       8,042       8,056        6,229  

Actual

     7,916       8,438        8,182       7,773       8,123        6,426  

Variance

     (158     335        (45     (269     67        197  

 

(1)

Annual Electric Delivery Forecast (GWh).

Variances among the customer classes, which are used to allocate payment responsibility for the securitized utility tariff bonds, may differ from the variances shown above, as the classifications relate to distribution voltage only.

Billing and Collections

In 2021, Evergy Missouri West received approximately 75% of total bill payments electronically, through means such as electronic funds transfer, electronic data interchange, pay by phone, and web-based payments. Approximately 23.2% of bill payments were received via U.S. Mail and the remaining 1.3% were received through Authorized Payment Agencies (walk-in payments). Regardless of payment type, if a customer currently has delinquent debt, the delinquent balance is paid first followed by any current outstanding debt for the billing period. Payment allocation rules are the same for all customers, where delinquent debt is satisfied first, followed by current debt. An account’s debt is broken into delinquent vs. current debt. Delinquent debt is debt aged greater than the due date of the bill. Current debt is debt aged less than the due date of the bill.

Residential customer accounts are considered past due 21 days from the bill date and non-residential customer accounts are considered past due 21 days from the bill date. For all customers, Evergy Missouri West mails a 10-day disconnection notice. In addition, Evergy Missouri West makes a reasonable attempt to contact an adult person residing at the customer’s residence at least 24 hours prior to termination of service.

For residential and non-residential customers, a closing bill including all unpaid amounts is generally issued within three to ten days of service termination. For all customers, if amounts remain outstanding after 23 days, a letter of non-payment will be sent to the customer. A second reminder letter will be sent 28 days after the first letter. Unpaid residential and non-residential accounts will be referred to third-party collection agencies approximately 90 days after the closing bill and listed with major credit bureaus by the agencies approximately 3 months thereafter. Active collections on unpaid accounts will continue up to the statutory limit of 3 years. Under current policies, unpaid closed account balances are written off approximately 90 days after the final bill is delinquent.

Generally, service may be disconnected if payment is not received after all notifications have been provided. Please read “—COVID-19 Customer Protections” below for current measure restricting Evergy Missouri West’s ability to disconnect customers for non-payment. The MPSC adopted certain additional regulations relating to disconnection that would make permanent certain of the provisions of the temporary protections enacted in connection with the COVID-19 pandemic, which may extend the time it takes to complete the process of disconnecting customers for nonpayment.

Before restoring service that has been shut-off for non-payment, Evergy Missouri West has the right to require the payment of the past due amount, a reconnection fee, and a deposit, if applicable.

 

49


Table of Contents

Credit Policy

Under Missouri law and MPSC regulatory guidelines, Evergy Missouri West is obligated to provide service to electricity customers in its service territory regardless of their creditworthiness.

Certain accounts are secured with deposits or guarantees to reduce losses. Since the vast majority of customers pay their bills within the allotted time, it is not necessary to require deposits from all customers. Specific criteria have been developed for establishing credit. These criteria are based on multiple factors, including prior service, payment history, or external credit score.

Non-residential customers may establish credit by depositing cash equal to twice the highest monthly electric charge or furnishing a satisfactory guarantor, or other credit support such as a surety bond, a certificate of deposit or an irrevocable letter of credit.

Evergy Missouri West may change its credit and collections policies from time to time.

COVID-19 Customer Protections

In December 2019, a novel strain of coronavirus (“COVID-19”) was reported to have surfaced in Wuhan, China, resulting in significant disruptions to manufacturing, supply chain, markets, and travel world-wide. On January 30, 2020, the International Health Regulations Emergency Committee of the World Health Organization declared the COVID-19 outbreak a public health emergency of international concern and on March 12, 2020, announced the outbreak was a pandemic. In response, Evergy Missouri West temporarily implemented policies that were intended to ease the financial burden of the pandemic on customers, including temporarily extending payment options and offering incentives for customer payments on overdue balances as well as the elimination of late payment fees and disconnections for non-payments. Disconnections for non-payments temporarily resumed in July of 2020 and were suspended again in response to a billing system conversion in the fall of 2020. Disconnections fully resumed in May of 2021. As of December 2022, Evergy Missouri West has not yet reinstated late payment charges or deposits for residential customers.

Loss Experience

The following table sets forth information relating to Evergy Missouri West’s annual net write-offs as a percentage of billed revenue for its electric retail customers for the five years ending December 31, 2017 through 2021 and year to date ended September 30, 2022:

 

Net Write-Offs as a Percentage of Billed Revenues (dollars in thousands)

 
     2017     2018     2019     2020     2021     Year to Date
September

30, 2022
 

Billed Electric Revenues

     760,392       813,664       784,624       749,290       772,209       661,496  

Net Write-Offs

     2,711       3,745       5,694       3,234       2,613       2,131  

Percentage of Billed Revenue

     0.3565     0.4603     0.7257     0.4316     0.3384     0.3221

Average Days Sales Outstanding

The following table sets forth information relating to the average number of days retail customer electricity bills remained outstanding from the bill date for the five years ending December 31, 2017 through 2021 and year to date ended September 30, 2022:

 

50


Table of Contents

Average Days Sales Outstanding

 
     2017      2018      2019      2020      2021      Year to
Date
September

30, 2022
 

Average Days Sales Outstanding

     22.54        25.17        22.27        23.50        23.48        20.20  

Delinquencies

The following table sets forth information relating to the delinquencies as a percentage of total annual billed revenues for all classes of electric customers as of December 31st for the years 2017 to 2021 and for the year to date ended September 30, 2022. Balances are delinquent when the following month’s bill is rendered. Customers on payments plans who are current on their plan installments are not considered delinquent.

 

Delinquencies as a Percentage of Total Billed Electric Revenues

 
     2017     2018     2019     2020     2021     Year to
Date
September

30, 2022
 

31-60 days

     0.71     0.69     0.62     0.66     0.63     0.68

61-90 days

     0.20     0.27     0.24     0.28     0.30     0.24

91+ days

     0.19     0.35     0.34     0.43     0.63     0.45

Total

     1.10     1.32     1.20     1.37     1.56     1.36

Municipalization

Missouri law may authorize certain local municipalities to seek to acquire portions of Evergy Missouri West’s electric distribution facilities through the power of eminent domain for use as part of municipally-owned utility systems and serve customers with those facilities. Additionally, local municipalities may extend their own facilities to take over service of customers located within their jurisdictional areas which overlap with Evergy Missouri West’s service territory. These circumstances involve what is referred to in the tariffs as “Municipal DL,” where the affected customers are no longer interconnected with Evergy Missouri West’s electric facilities.

The Securitization Law and the financing order provide that the securitized utility tariff charges must be paid by all existing and future customers, except Exempted Customers, within Evergy Missouri West’s service territory as it existed on the date of the financing order.

The Securitization Law also specifies that any successor to an electrical corporation shall perform and satisfy all obligations of the electrical corporation pursuant to the Securitization Law, including collecting and paying to the bondholders revenues arising with respect to the securitized utility tariff property. In the servicing agreement, Evergy Missouri West will covenant to assert in an appropriate forum that any municipality that acquires any portion of Evergy Missouri West’s electric distribution facilities must be treated as a successor to Evergy Missouri West under the Securitization Law and the financing order, subject to approval by the MPSC, and that retail customers in such municipalities remain responsible for payment of securitized utility tariff charges.

Successors

Missouri law also provides the merger, sale or control of Evergy Missouri West, either directly or indirectly, by any person or corporation must be approved by the MPSC. The Securitization Law specifies that any successor to an electrical corporation shall perform and satisfy all obligations of, and have the same rights under a financing order as, the electrical corporation under the financing order in the manner and to the same extent as the electrical corporation, including collecting and paying to the bondholders revenues, collections, payments or proceeds arising with respect to the securitized utility tariff property. Further, the financing order states that it is binding on Evergy Missouri West and any successor that provides transmission or distribution electric service directly to customers of Evergy Missouri West. In the servicing agreement, Evergy Missouri West has covenanted to assert in an appropriate forum that any person or corporation that merges with, acquires or controls Evergy Missouri West directly or indirectly must be treated as a successor to Evergy Missouri West under the Securitization Law and the financing order, subject to approval by the MPSC, and that customers remain responsible for payment of securitized utility tariff charges.

 

51


Table of Contents

Future Securitizations

Evergy Missouri West, in its sole discretion, may sell securitized utility tariff property or property similar to securitized utility tariff property, created by one or more separate financing orders in connection with the issuance of additional securitized utility tariff bonds or obligations similar to the securitized utility tariff bonds without your prior review or approval.

Any new issuance would be offered pursuant to a separate registration statement and may include terms and provisions that would be unique to that particular issuance. Evergy Missouri West has covenanted in the sale agreement that the satisfaction of the rating agency condition and the execution and delivery of a joinder to the intercreditor agreement are condition precedents to the sale of additional securitized utility tariff property or similar property consisting of non-bypassable charges payable by customers comparable to the securitized utility tariff property to another entity. Please read “Security for the Securitized Utility Tariff Bonds—Intercreditor Agreement” and “Sale Agreement—Covenants of the Seller” in this prospectus.

Where to Find Information About Evergy Missouri West

Evergy Missouri West routinely provides links to Evergy Missouri West’s principal regulatory proceedings before the FERC at http://investors.evergy.com, under the “FERC Filings” tab, so that such filings are available to investors upon filing with the relevant agency. The information contained on such website (other than the materials specifically incorporated by reference herein) is not part of this registration statement or any report that Evergy Missouri West files with, or furnishes to, the SEC. Evergy Missouri West and the issuing entity are providing the address to this website solely for the information of investors and does not intend the address to be an active link.

 

52


Table of Contents

EVERGY MISSOURI WEST STORM FUNDING I, LLC, THE ISSUING ENTITY

The issuing entity is a special purpose limited liability company formed under the Delaware Limited Liability Company Act pursuant to a limited liability company agreement executed by the issuing entity’s sole member, Evergy Missouri West, and the filing of a certificate of formation with the Secretary of the State of Delaware. The issuing entity was formed on November 21, 2022.

The issuing entity has been organized as a special purpose subsidiary of Evergy Missouri West for the limited purpose of holding securitized utility tariff property and issuing the securitized utility tariff bonds secured by securitized utility tariff property and other collateral pledged to secure the securitized utility tariff bonds.

The issuing entity’s limited liability company agreement restricts it from engaging in activities other than those described in this section. The issuing entity does not have any employees, but it will pay its member for out-of-pocket expenses incurred by the member in connection with its services to the issuing entity in accordance with the issuing entity’s limited liability company agreement. The issuing entity has summarized selected provisions of its limited liability company agreement below, a copy of which has been filed as an exhibit to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part. On the date of issuance of the securitized utility tariff bonds, the capital subaccount securing the securitized utility tariff bonds will be funded at a level equal to 0.50% of the principal amount of such securitized utility tariff bonds issued or such other amount as may allow the securitized utility tariff bonds to achieve the desired security rating and treat the securitized utility tariff bonds as debt under applicable guidance issued by the Internal Revenue Service, which the issuing entity also refers to as the “IRS.”

At the time of the issuance of the securitized utility tariff bonds, the issuing entity’s assets available to secure the securitized utility tariff bonds will consist primarily of the securitized utility tariff property and the other collateral held under the indenture and the series supplement for the securitized utility tariff bonds.

Restricted Purpose

The issuing entity has been created for the sole purpose of:

 

   

acquiring, owning, holding, disposing of, administering, servicing or entering into agreements regarding the receipt and servicing of the securitized utility tariff property, and any securitized utility tariff property created by the financing order or an additional financing order, and the other collateral;

 

   

issuing the securitized utility tariff bonds;

 

   

making payment on the securitized utility tariff bonds;

 

   

distributing amounts released to the issuing entity;

 

   

managing, selling, assigning, pledging, collecting amounts due on, or otherwise dealing with the securitized utility tariff property and the other securitized utility tariff bond collateral and related assets;

 

   

negotiating, executing, assuming and performing the issuing entity’s obligations under the basic documents;

 

   

performing other activities that are necessary, suitable or convenient to accomplish these purposes.

The issuing entity’s limited liability company agreement does not permit the issuing entity to engage in any activities not directly related to these purposes, including issuing securities (other than the securitized utility tariff bonds), borrowing money or making loans to other persons. The list of permitted activities set forth in the issuing entity’s limited liability company agreement may not be altered, amended or repealed without the affirmative vote of a majority of the issuing entity’s managers, which vote must include the affirmative vote of the issuing entity’s independent manager. The issuing entity’s limited liability company agreement and the indenture will prohibit it from issuing any securitized utility tariff bonds (as such term is defined in the Securitization Law), other than the securitized utility tariff bonds that the issuing entity will offer pursuant to this prospectus. Please read “Security for the Securitized Utility Tariff Bonds—How Funds in the Collection Account will be Allocated” and “—Allocations as Between Series of Securitized Utility Tariff Bonds” in this prospectus.

 

53


Table of Contents

The Issuing Entity’s Relationship with Evergy Missouri West

On the issue date for the securitized utility tariff bonds, Evergy Missouri West will sell securitized utility tariff property to the issuing entity pursuant to a sale agreement between the issuing entity and Evergy Missouri West. Evergy Missouri West will service the securitized utility tariff property pursuant to a servicing agreement between the issuing entity and Evergy Missouri West and will provide administrative services to the issuing entity pursuant to an administration agreement between the issuing entity and Evergy Missouri West.

The Issuing Entity’s Management

Pursuant to the issuing entity’s limited liability company agreement, the issuing entity’s business will be managed by three or more managers, at least one of whom will be an independent manager, in each case appointed from time to time by Evergy Missouri West or, in the event that Evergy Missouri West transfers its interest in the issuing entity, by the issuing entity’s owner or owners. Following the initial issuance of securitized utility tariff bonds, the issuing entity will have at least one independent manager, who among other things, must be a natural person who, for the five-year period prior to his or her appointment as an independent manager has not been and during the continuation of his or her service as independent manager is not:

 

   

an employee, director, stockholder, manager, partner, agent, consultant, attorney, accountant, advisor or officer or an employee, director, manager, stockholder, partner, agent, consultant, attorney, accountant, advisor or officer of the issuing entity, Evergy Missouri West or any of their respective affiliates, other than his or her service as independent manager;

 

   

a creditor or supplier, or a creditor, service provider or supplier of the issuing entity, Evergy Missouri West or any their respective affiliates, except that an independent manager may be an employee of a supplier of corporate related services to the issuing entity or any of our affiliates; or

 

   

any member of the immediate family of a person described in either of the above bullets.

Evergy Missouri West, as the issuing entity’s sole member, appointed the independent manager prior to the issuance of the securitized utility tariff bonds. None of the issuing entity’s managers or officers has been involved in any legal proceedings which are specified in Item 401(f) of the SEC’s Regulation S-K. None of the issuing entity’s managers or officers beneficially own any equity interest in the issuing entity.

The following is a list of our managers as of the date of this prospectus:

 

Name

  

Age

  

Title

  

Background

Geoffrey T. Ley    48    Manager and President    Geoffrey T. Ley was appointed Vice President, Corporate Planning and Treasurer of Evergy, Inc and Evergy Missouri West in December 2022. Since joining Evergy in June 2021, Mr. Ley served as Vice President, Financial Planning and Analysis. Mr. Ley previously served as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer at Hunt Refining Company from 2019-2021. Prior to joining Hunt Refining, Mr. Ley was Vice President and Treasurer for Hunt Utility Services LLC (2014-2019), the management company for InfraREIT, Inc. Before joining Hunt Utility Services, Mr. Ley held various treasury and corporate planning roles in 2007-2014 with Energy Future Holdings Corp. and its predecessor, TXU Corp.
Jason O. Humphrey    36    Manager, Treasury and Secretary    Jason O. Humphrey was appointed Assistant Treasurer of Evergy, Inc and Evergy Missouri West, Inc effective November 2020. Prior to that, Mr. Humphrey had served as Senior Director, Finance and Director, Integration Success since Evergy was formed in 2018. Prior to June of 2018 Jason was a member of Westar and served in various Generation and Corporate Roles since joining in 2008.

 

54


Table of Contents

Manager Fees and Limitation on Liabilities

The issuing entity has not and will not compensate its managers, other than the independent manager, for their services on behalf of the issuing entity. The issuing entity will pay the annual fees of the independent manager from its revenues and will reimburse them for reasonable expenses. These expenses include the reasonable compensation, expenses and disbursements of the agents, representatives, experts and counsel that the independent managers may employ in connection with the exercise and performance of his or her rights and duties under the issuing entity’s limited liability company agreement.

The issuing entity’s limited liability company agreement provides that to the extent permitted by law, the managers will not be personally liable for any of the issuing entity’s debts, obligations or liabilities. The issuing entity’s limited liability company agreement further provides that, except as described below, to the fullest extent permitted by law, the issuing entity will indemnify the managers against any liability incurred in connection with their services as managers for us if they acted in good faith and in a manner which they reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the issuing entity’s best interests. With respect to a criminal action, the managers will be indemnified unless they had reasonable cause to believe their conduct was unlawful. The issuing entity will not indemnify the manager for any judgment, penalty, fine or other expense directly caused by their fraud, gross negligence or willful misconduct. In addition, unless ordered by a court, the issuing entity will not indemnify the managers if a final adjudication establishes that their acts or omissions involved intentional misconduct, fraud or a knowing violation of the law and were material to the cause of action. The issuing entity will pay any indemnification amounts owed to the managers out of funds in the collection accounts, subject to the priority of payments described under “Security for the Securitized Utility Tariff Bonds—How Funds in the Collection Account will be Allocated” in this prospectus.

The Issuing Entity is a Separate and Distinct Legal Entity from Evergy Missouri West

Under the issuing entity’s limited liability company agreement, the issuing entity may not file a voluntary bankruptcy petition for relief under the Bankruptcy Code or any other state, local, federal, foreign or other law relating to bankruptcy, without the affirmative vote of a majority of the issuing entity’s managers, which vote must include the affirmative vote of the issuing entity’s independent manager. Evergy Missouri West has agreed that it will not cause the issuing entity to file a voluntary petition for relief under the Bankruptcy Code. The issuing entity’s limited liability company agreement requires the issuing entity, except for financial reporting purposes (to the extent required by generally accepted accounting principles) and for federal income tax purposes, and, to the extent consistent with applicable state law, state income and franchise tax purposes, to maintain its existence separate from Evergy Missouri West including:

 

   

taking all necessary steps to continue its identity as a separate legal entity;

 

   

making it apparent to third persons that the issuing entity is an entity with assets and liabilities distinct from those of Evergy Missouri West, other affiliates of Evergy Missouri West, the managers or any other person; and

 

   

making it apparent to third persons that, except for federal and certain other tax purposes, the issuing entity is not a division of Evergy Missouri West or any of its affiliated entities or any other person.

Administration Agreement

Evergy Missouri West will, pursuant to an administration agreement between Evergy Missouri West and the issuing entity, provide administrative services to the issuing entity, including, among others, services relating to required filings with the SEC with respect to the securitized utility tariff bonds, any financial statements or tax returns the issuing entity might be required to file under applicable law, qualifications to do business, and minutes of the issuing entity’s managers’ meetings. The issuing entity will pay Evergy Missouri West a fixed fee of $50,000 per annum, plus reimbursable third-party costs.

 

55


Table of Contents

DESCRIPTION OF THE SECURITIZED UTILITY TARIFF BONDS

General

The depositor has summarized below selected provisions of the indenture and the securitized utility tariff bonds. A form of the indenture and series supplement are filed as exhibits to the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part. Please read “Where You Can Find More Information” in this prospectus.

The securitized utility tariff bonds are not a debt or a general obligation of the State of Missouri or any of its political subdivisions, agencies, or instrumentalities, including the MPSC, nor are they special obligations or indebtedness of the State of Missouri or any agency or political subdivision. The securitized utility tariff bonds do not, directly, indirectly, or contingently, obligate the State of Missouri or any agency, political subdivision, or instrumentality of the state to levy any tax or make any appropriation for payment of the securitized utility tariff bonds, other than in their capacity as consumers of electricity. Neither Evergy Missouri West nor any of its affiliates will guarantee or insure the securitized utility tariff bonds. The securitized utility tariff bonds do not constitute a pledge of the full faith and credit nor the taxing power of the State of Missouri or of any of its political subdivisions. The issuance of the securitized utility tariff bonds under the Securitization Law will not directly, indirectly or contingently obligate the State of Missouri or any of its political subdivisions to levy or to pledge any form of taxation for the securitized utility tariff bonds or to make any appropriation for their payment, other than in their capacity as consumers of electricity.

The issuing entity will issue the securitized utility tariff bonds and secure their payment under an indenture that the issuing entity will enter into with The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, National Association, as trustee, referred to in this prospectus as the “trustee.” The issuing entity will issue the securitized utility tariff bonds in minimum denominations of $2,000 and in integral multiples of $1,000 in excess thereof, except that the issuing entity may issue one securitized utility tariff bond in each tranche in a smaller denomination. The initial principal balance, scheduled final payment date, final maturity date and interest rate for each tranche of the securitized utility tariff bonds are stated in the table below:

Expected Outstanding Principal Balance Per Tranche

 

Tranche  

Expected Weighted

Average Life (Years)

 

Principal Amount

Offered

  Scheduled Final
Payment Date
  Final Maturity Date   Interest Rate
                     
                     
                     
                     

The scheduled final payment date for each tranche of the securitized utility tariff bonds is the date when the outstanding principal balance of that tranche will be reduced to zero if the issuing entity makes payments according to the expected sinking fund schedule for that tranche. The final maturity date for each tranche of securitized utility tariff bonds is the date when the issuing entity is required to pay the entire remaining unpaid principal balance, if any, of all outstanding securitized utility tariff bonds of that tranche. The failure to pay principal of any tranche of securitized utility tariff bonds by the final maturity date for that tranche is an event of default, but the failure to pay principal of any tranche of securitized utility tariff bonds by the respective scheduled final payment date will not be an event of default. Please read “—Interest Payments” and “—Principal Payments” and “—Events of Default; Rights Upon Event of Default” in this prospectus.

Payment and Record Dates and Payment Sources

Beginning                 , the issuing entity will make payments of principal and interest on the securitized utility tariff bonds semi-annually on                 and                  of each year, or, if that day is not a business day, the following business day (each, a “payment date”). So long as the securitized utility tariff bonds are in book-entry form, on each payment date, the issuing entity will make interest and principal payments to the persons who are the holders of record

 

56


Table of Contents

as of the business day immediately prior to that payment date, which is referred to herein as the “record date.” If the issuing entity issues certificated securitized utility tariff bonds to beneficial owners of the securitized utility tariff bonds, the record date will be the last business day of the calendar month immediately preceding the payment date. On each payment date, the issuing entity will pay amounts on outstanding securitized utility tariff bonds from amounts available in the collection account and the related subaccounts held by the trustee in the priority set forth under “Security for the Securitized Utility Tariff Bonds—How Funds in the Collection Account will be Allocated” in this prospectus. These available amounts, which will include amounts collected by the servicer for the issuing entity with respect to the securitized utility tariff charges, are described in greater detail under “Security for the Securitized Utility Tariff Bonds—How Funds in the Collection Account will be Allocated” and “The Servicing Agreement—Remittances to Collection Account” in this prospectus.

Interest Payments

Interest on each tranche of securitized utility tariff bonds will accrue from and including the issue date to but excluding the first payment date, and thereafter from and including the previous payment date to but excluding the applicable payment date until the securitized utility tariff bonds have been paid in full, at the interest rate indicated on the cover of this prospectus and in the table above. Each of those periods is referred to as an “interest accrual period.” The issuing entity will calculate interest on tranches of the securitized utility tariff bonds on the basis of a 360-day year of twelve 30-day months.

On each payment date, the issuing entity will pay interest on each tranche of the securitized utility tariff bonds equal to the following amounts:

 

   

if there has been a payment default, any interest payable but unpaid on any prior payment date, together with interest on such unpaid interest, if any; and

 

   

accrued interest on the principal balance of each tranche of the securitized utility tariff bonds as of the close of business on the preceding payment date (or with respect to the initial payment date, the date of the original issuance of the securitized utility tariff bonds) after giving effect to all payments of principal made on the preceding payment date, if any.

The issuing entity will pay interest on the securitized utility tariff bonds before the issuing entity pays principal on the securitized utility tariff bonds. Interest payments will be made from collections of securitized utility tariff charges, including amounts available in the excess funds subaccount and, if necessary, the amounts available in the capital subaccount.

If there is a shortfall in the amounts available in the collection account to make interest payments on the securitized utility tariff bonds, the trustee will distribute interest pro rata to each tranche of securitized utility tariff bonds based on the amount of interest payable on each such outstanding tranche. Please read “Security for the Securitized Utility Tariff Bonds—How Funds in the Collection Account will be Allocated” in this prospectus.

Principal Payments

On each payment date, the issuing entity will pay principal of the securitized utility tariff bonds to the bondholders equal to the sum, without duplication, of:

 

   

the unpaid principal amount of any securitized utility tariff bond whose final maturity date is on that payment date, plus

 

   

the unpaid principal amount of any securitized utility tariff bond upon acceleration following an event of default relating to the securitized utility tariff bonds, plus

 

   

any overdue payments of principal, plus

 

   

any unpaid and previously scheduled payments of principal, plus

 

   

the principal scheduled to be paid on any securitized utility tariff bond on that payment date,

 

57


Table of Contents

but only to the extent funds are available in the collection account after payment of certain of the issuing entity’s fees and expenses and after payment of interest as described above under “—Interest Payments” in this prospectus. If the trustee receives insufficient collections of securitized utility tariff charges for any payment date, and amounts in the collection account (and the applicable subaccounts of the collection account) are not sufficient to make up the shortfall, principal of any tranche of securitized utility tariff bonds may be payable later than expected. Please read “Risk Factors—Other Risks Associated with an Investment in the Securitized Utility Tariff Bonds” in this prospectus. To the extent funds are so available, the issuing entity will make scheduled payments of principal of the securitized utility tariff bonds in the following order:

 

  (1)

to the holders of the tranche                  securitized utility tariff bonds, until the principal balance of that tranche has been reduced to zero,

 

  (2)

to the holders of the tranche                  securitized utility tariff bonds, until the principal balance of that tranche has been reduced to zero, and

 

  (3)

to the holders of the tranche                  securitized utility tariff bonds, until the principal balance of that tranche has been reduced to zero.

However, on any payment date, unless an event of default has occurred and is continuing and the securitized utility tariff bonds have been declared due and payable, the trustee will make principal payments on the securitized utility tariff bonds only until the outstanding principal balances of those securitized utility tariff bonds have been reduced to the principal balances specified in the applicable expected sinking fund schedule for that payment date. Accordingly, principal of the securitized utility tariff bonds may be paid later, but not sooner, than reflected in the expected sinking fund schedule, except in the case of an acceleration. The entire unpaid principal balance of each tranche of the securitized utility tariff bonds will be due and payable on the final maturity date for that tranche. The failure to make a scheduled payment of principal on the securitized utility tariff bonds because there are not sufficient funds in the collection account does not constitute a default or an event of default under the indenture, except for the failure to pay in full the unpaid balance of any tranche upon the final maturity date for such tranche.

Unless the securitized utility tariff bonds have been accelerated following an event of default, any excess funds remaining in the collection account after payment of principal, interest, applicable fees and expenses and payments to the applicable subaccounts of the collection account will be retained in the excess funds subaccount until applied on a subsequent payment date.

If an event of default (other than a breach by the State of Missouri of the State Pledge) has occurred and is continuing, then the trustee or the holders of not less than a majority in principal amount of the securitized utility tariff bonds then outstanding may declare the securitized utility tariff bonds to be immediately due and payable, in which event the entire unpaid principal amount of the securitized utility tariff bonds will become due and payable. Please read “—Events of Default; Rights Upon Event of Default” in this prospectus. However, the nature of the issuing entity’s business will result in payment of principal upon an acceleration of the securitized utility tariff bonds being made as funds become available.

Please read “Risk Factors—Risks Associated With the Unusual Nature of the Securitized Utility Tariff Property—Foreclosure of the trustee’s lien on the securitized utility tariff property for the securitized utility tariff bonds might not be practical, and acceleration of the securitized utility tariff bonds before maturity might have little practical effect” and “Risk Factors—You may experience material payment delays or incur a loss on your investment in the securitized utility tariff bonds because the source of funds for payment is limited” in this prospectus.

If there is a shortfall in the amounts available to make principal payments on the securitized utility tariff bonds that are due and payable, including upon an acceleration following an event of default, the trustee will distribute principal from the collection account pro rata to each tranche of securitized utility tariff bonds based on the principal amount then due and payable on the payment date; and if there is a shortfall in the remaining amounts available to make principal payments on the securitized utility tariff bonds that are scheduled to be paid, the trustee will distribute principal from the collection account pro rata to each tranche of securitized utility tariff bonds based on the principal amount then scheduled to be paid on the payment date.

 

58


Table of Contents

The expected sinking fund schedule below sets forth the corresponding principal payment that is scheduled to be made on each payment date for each tranche of the securitized utility tariff bonds from the issuance date to the scheduled final payment date. Similarly, the expected sinking fund schedule below sets forth the principal balance that is scheduled to remain outstanding on each payment date for each tranche of the securitized utility tariff bonds from the issuance date to the scheduled final payment date.

 

59


Table of Contents

EXPECTED SINKING FUND SCHEDULE

 

Semi-Annual
Payment Date

   Tranche
Principal
     Tranche
Principal
     Tranche
Principal
     Tranche
Principal
     Tranche
Principal
 
   $        $        $        $        $    
              
              
              
              

Total Payments

              

The issuing entity cannot assure you that the principal balance of any tranche of the securitized utility tariff bonds will be reduced at the rate indicated in the table above. The actual reduction in tranche principal balances may occur more slowly. The actual reduction in tranche principal balances will not occur more quickly than indicated in the above table, except in the case of acceleration due to an event of default under the indenture. The securitized utility tariff bonds will not be in default if principal is not paid as specified in the schedule above unless the principal of any tranche is not paid in full on or before the final maturity date of that tranche.

 

60


Table of Contents

EXPECTED AMORTIZATION TABLE

 

Semi-Annual
Payment Date

   Tranche
Principal
     Tranche
Principal
     Tranche
Principal
     Tranche
Principal
     Tranche
Principal
 

Closing Date

   $        $        $        $        $    
              
              
              
              

On each payment date, the trustee will make principal payments to the extent the principal balance of each tranche of the securitized utility tariff bonds exceeds the amount indicated for that payment date in the table above and to the extent of funds available in the collection account after payment of certain of the issuing entity’s fees and expenses and after payment of interest.

Distribution Following Acceleration

Upon an acceleration of the maturity of the securitized utility tariff bonds, the total outstanding principal balance of and interest accrued on the securitized utility tariff bonds will be payable, without regard to tranche. Although principal will be due and payable upon acceleration, the nature of the issuing entity’s business will result in principal being paid as funds become available. Please read “Risk Factors—Risks Associated with the Unusual Nature of the Securitized Utility Tariff Property—Foreclosure of the trustee’s lien on the securitized utility tariff property for the securitized utility tariff bonds might not be practical, and acceleration of the securitized utility tariff bonds before maturity might have little practical effect” and “Risk Factors—You may experience material payment delays or incur a loss on your investment in the securitized utility tariff bonds because the source of funds for payment is limited” in this prospectus.

Optional Redemption

The issuing entity may not voluntarily redeem any tranche of the securitized utility tariff bonds.

 

61


Table of Contents

Payments on the Securitized Utility Tariff Bonds

The trustee will pay on each payment date to the holders of each tranche of securitized utility tariff bonds, to the extent of available funds in the collection account, all payments of principal and interest then due. The trustee will make each payment other than the final payment with respect to any securitized utility tariff bonds to the holders of record of the securitized utility tariff bonds of the applicable tranche on the record date for that payment date. The trustee will make the final payment for each tranche of securitized utility tariff bonds, however, only upon presentation and surrender of the securitized utility tariff bonds of that tranche at the office or agency of the trustee specified in the notice given by the trustee of the final payment. The trustee will mail notice of the final payment to the bondholders no later than five days prior to the final payment date, specifying the date set for the final payment and the amount of the payment.

The failure to pay accrued interest on any payment date (even if the failure is caused by a shortfall in securitized utility tariff charges received) will result in an event of default for the securitized utility tariff bonds unless such failure is cured within five business days. Please read “—Events of Default; Rights Upon Event of Default” in this prospectus. Any interest not paid when due (plus interest on the defaulted interest at the applicable interest rate to the extent lawful) will be payable to the bondholders on a special record date. The special record date will be at least fifteen business days prior to the date on which the trustee is to make such special payment (a “special payment date”). The issuing entity will fix any special record date and special payment date. At least 10 days before any special record date, the trustee will mail to each affected bondholder a notice that states the special record date, the special payment date and the amount of defaulted interest (plus interest on the defaulted interest) to be paid.

The entire unpaid principal amount of the securitized utility tariff bonds will be due and payable:

 

   

on the final maturity date; or

 

   

if an event of default under the indenture occurs and is continuing and the trustee or the holders of a majority in principal amount of the securitized utility tariff bonds have declared the securitized utility tariff bonds to be immediately due and payable.

However, the nature of the issuing entity’s business will result in payment of principal upon an acceleration of the securitized utility tariff bonds being made as funds become available. Please read “Risk Factors—Risks Associated with the Unusual Nature of the Securitized Utility Tariff Property—Foreclosure of the trustee’s lien on the securitized utility tariff property for the securitized utility tariff bonds might not be practical, and acceleration of the securitized utility tariff bonds before maturity might have little practical effect” and “Risk Factors—You may experience material payment delays or incur a loss on your investment in the securitized utility tariff bonds because the source of funds for payment is limited” in this prospectus.

At the time, if any, the issuing entity issues the securitized utility tariff bonds in the form of definitive securitized utility tariff bonds and not to DTC or its nominee, the trustee will make payments with respect to that tranche on a payment date or a special payment date by wire transfer to each holder of a definitive securitized utility tariff bond of the tranche of record on the applicable record date to an account maintained by the payee.

If any special payment date or other date specified for any payments to bondholders is not a business day, the trustee will make payments scheduled to be made on that special payment date or other date on the next succeeding business day and no interest will accrue upon the payment during the intervening period.

Fees and Expenses

As set forth in the table below, the issuing entity is obligated to pay fees to the servicer, the trustee, its independent managers and Evergy Missouri West as administrator. The following table illustrates this arrangement.

 

62


Table of Contents

Recipient

  

Source of Payment

  

Fees and Expenses Payable

Servicer    Securitized utility tariff charge collections and investment earnings    $             (0.05% of the initial aggregate principal amount of the securitized utility tariff bonds) per annum (so long as servicer is Evergy Missouri West or an affiliate), plus out of pocket expenses
Trustee    Securitized utility tariff charge collections and investment earnings    $             per annum plus expenses
Independent Manager    Securitized utility tariff charge collections and investment earnings    $             per annum plus expenses
Administration Fee    Securitized utility tariff charge collections and investment earnings    $            50,000 per annum plus expenses

The annual servicing fee for the securitized utility tariff bonds payable to any other servicer not affiliated with Evergy Missouri West must be approved by the MPSC. The MPSC will not approve the appointment of a successor servicer unless the rating agency condition for the securitized utility tariff bonds is satisfied.

Securitized Utility Tariff Bonds Will Be Issued in Book-Entry Form

The securitized utility tariff bonds will be available to investors only in the form of book-entry securitized utility tariff bonds. You may hold your securitized utility tariff bonds through DTC in the United States, Clearstream Banking, Luxembourg, S.A., referred to as Clearstream, or Euroclear in Europe. You may hold your securitized utility tariff bonds directly with one of these systems if you are a participant in the system or indirectly through organizations that are participants.

The Role of DTC, Clearstream and Euroclear

Cede & Co., as nominee for DTC, will hold the global securitized utility tariff bond or securitized utility tariff bonds representing the securitized utility tariff bonds. Clearstream and Euroclear will hold omnibus positions on behalf of the Clearstream customers and Euroclear participants, respectively, through customers’ securities accounts in Clearstream’s and Euroclear’s names on the books of their respective depositaries. These depositaries will, in turn, hold these positions in customers’ securities accounts in the depositaries’ names on the books of DTC.

The Function of DTC

DTC, the world’s largest securities depository, is a limited-purpose trust company organized under the New York Banking Law, a “banking organization” within the meaning of the New York Banking Law, a member of the Federal Reserve System, a “clearing corporation” within the meaning of the New York Uniform Commercial Code, and a “clearing agency” registered pursuant to the provisions of Section 17A of the Exchange Act. DTC holds and provides asset servicing for over 3.5 million issues of U.S. and non-U.S. equity issues, corporate and municipal debt issues, and money market instruments (from over 100 countries) that DTC’s participants (“direct participants”) deposit with DTC. DTC also facilitates the post-trade settlement among direct participants of sales and other securities transactions in deposited securities, through electronic computerized book-entry transfers and pledges between direct participants’ accounts, thereby eliminating the need for physical movement of securities certificates. Direct participants include both U.S. and non-U.S. securities brokers and dealers, banks, trust companies, clearing corporations, and certain other organizations. DTC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (“DTCC”). DTCC is the holding company for DTC, National Securities Clearing Corporation and Fixed Income Clearing Corporation, all of which are registered clearing agencies.

DTCC is owned by the users of its regulated subsidiaries. Access to the DTC system is also available to others such as both U.S. and non-U.S. securities brokers and dealers, banks, trust companies, and clearing corporations that clear through or maintain a custodial relationship with a direct participants, either directly or indirectly (“indirect participants”). The DTC Rules applicable to its Participants are on file with the SEC. More information about DTC can be found at www.dtcc.com and www.dtc.org.

 

63


Table of Contents

The Function of Clearstream

Clearstream holds securities for its customers and facilitates the clearance and settlement of securities transactions between Clearstream customers through electronic book-entry changes in accounts of Clearstream customers, thereby eliminating the need for physical movement of securities. Transactions may be settled by Clearstream in any of various currencies, including United States dollars. Clearstream provides to its customers, among other things, services for safekeeping, administration, clearance and settlement of internationally traded securities and securities lending and borrowing. Clearstream also deals with domestic securities markets in various countries through established depositary and custodial relationships. Clearstream is registered as a bank in Luxembourg and therefore is subject to regulation by the Luxembourg Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier, which supervises Luxembourg banks. Clearstream’s customers are world-wide financial institutions including underwriters, securities brokers and dealers, banks, trust companies and clearing corporations, among others, and may include the underwriters of the securitized utility tariff bonds. Clearstream’s U.S. customers are limited to securities brokers and dealers and banks. Clearstream has customers located in various countries. Indirect access to Clearstream is also available to other institutions that clear through or maintain a custodial relationship with an account holder of Clearstream. Clearstream has established an electronic bridge with Euroclear to facilitate settlement of trades between Clearstream and Euroclear.

The Function of Euroclear

The Euroclear System was created in 1968 in Brussels. Euroclear holds securities and book-entry interests in securities for Euroclear participants and facilitates the clearance and settlement of securities transactions between Euroclear participants, and between Euroclear participants and participants of certain other securities intermediaries through simultaneous electronic book-entry delivery against payment, thereby eliminating the need for physical movement of securities and any risk from lack of simultaneous transfers of securities and cash. Such transactions may be settled in any of various currencies, including United States dollars. The Euroclear System includes various other services, including, among other things, safekeeping, administration, clearance and settlement, securities lending and borrowing and interfaces with domestic markets in several countries generally similar to the arrangements for cross-market transfers with DTC described below. The Euroclear System is operated by Euroclear Bank SA/NV. Euroclear participants include central banks and other banks, securities brokers and dealers and other professional financial intermediaries and may include the underwriters of the securitized utility tariff bonds. Indirect access to the Euroclear System is also available to other firms that clear through or maintain a custodial relationship with a Euroclear participant, either directly or indirectly.

Terms and Conditions of Euroclear

Securities clearance accounts and cash accounts with Euroclear are governed by the Terms and Conditions Governing Use of Euroclear and the related Operating Procedures of the Euroclear System, and applicable Belgian law (collectively, the “Terms and Conditions”). These Terms and Conditions govern transfers of securities and cash within the Euroclear System, withdrawals of securities and cash from the Euroclear System and receipts of payments with respect to securities in the Euroclear System. All securities in Euroclear are held on a fungible basis without attribution of specific securities to specific securities clearance accounts. Euroclear acts under the Terms and Conditions only on behalf of Euroclear participants and has no record of or relationship with persons holding through Euroclear participants.

The Rules for Transfers Among DTC, Clearstream or Euroclear Participants

Transfers between DTC participants will occur in accordance with DTC rules. Transfers between Clearstream customers or Euroclear participants will occur in the ordinary way in accordance with their applicable rules and operating procedures and will be settled using procedures applicable to conventional securities held in registered form.

 

64


Table of Contents

Cross-market transfers between persons holding directly or indirectly through DTC, on the one hand, and directly or indirectly through Clearstream customers or Euroclear participants, on the other, will be effected through DTC in accordance with DTC rules on behalf of the relevant European international clearing system by its depositary; however, those cross-market transactions will require delivery of instructions to the relevant European international clearing system by the counterparty in that system in accordance with its rules and procedures and within its established deadlines, which will be based on European time. The relevant European international clearing system will, if the transaction meets its settlement requirements, deliver instructions to its depositary to take action to effect final settlement on its behalf by delivering or receiving securitized utility tariff bonds in DTC and making or receiving payment in accordance with normal procedures for same-day funds settlement applicable to DTC. Clearstream customers and Euroclear participants may not deliver instructions directly to Clearstream’s and Euroclear’s depositaries.

Because of time-zone differences, credits of securities in Clearstream or Euroclear as a result of a transaction with a participant will be made during the subsequent securities settlement processing, dated the business day following the DTC settlement date, and those credits or any transactions in those securities settled during that processing will be reported to the relevant Clearstream customer or Euroclear participant on that business day. Cash received in Clearstream or Euroclear as a result of sales of securities by or through a Clearstream customer or a Euroclear participant to a DTC participant will be received with value on the DTC settlement date but will be available in the relevant Clearstream or Euroclear cash account only as of the business day following settlement in DTC.

DTC Will Be the Holder of the Securitized Utility Tariff Bonds

Bondholders that are not participants or indirect participants but desire to purchase, sell or otherwise transfer ownership of, or other interest in, securitized utility tariff bonds may do so only through direct participants and indirect participants. In addition, bondholders will receive all payments of principal of and interest on the securitized utility tariff bonds from the trustee through the participants, who in turn will receive them from DTC. Under a book-entry format, bondholders may experience some delay in their receipt of payments because payments will be forwarded by the trustee to Cede & Co., as nominee for DTC. DTC will forward those payments to its participants, who thereafter will forward them to indirect participants or bondholders. It is anticipated that the only “bondholder” will be Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC. The trustee will not recognize bondholders as bondholders, as that term is used in the indenture, and bondholders will be permitted to exercise the rights of bondholders only indirectly through the participants, who in turn will exercise the rights of bondholders through DTC.

Under the rules, regulations and procedures creating and affecting DTC and its operations, DTC is required to make book-entry transfers of book-entry certificates among participants on whose behalf it acts with respect to the securitized utility tariff bonds and is required to receive and transmit payments of principal and interest on the securitized utility tariff bonds. Direct participants and indirect participants with whom bondholders have accounts with respect to the securitized utility tariff bonds similarly are required to make book-entry transfers and receive and transmit those payments on behalf of their respective bondholders. Accordingly, although bondholders will not possess securitized utility tariff bonds, bondholders will receive payments and will be able to transfer their interests.

Because DTC can act only on behalf of participants, who in turn act on behalf of indirect participants and certain banks, the ability of a bondholder to pledge securitized utility tariff bonds to persons or entities that do not participate in the DTC system, or otherwise take actions in respect of those securitized utility tariff bonds, may be limited due to the lack of a physical certificate for those securitized utility tariff bonds.

DTC has advised the issuing entity that it will take any action permitted to be taken by a bondholder under the indenture only at the direction of one or more participants to whose account with DTC the securitized utility tariff bonds are credited. Additionally, DTC has advised the issuing entity that it will take those actions with respect to specified percentages of the collateral amount only at the direction of and on behalf of participants whose holdings include interests that satisfy those specified percentages. DTC may take conflicting actions with respect to other interests to the extent that those actions are taken on behalf of participants whose holdings include those interests.

Except as required by law, none of any underwriter, the servicer, Evergy Missouri West, the trustee, the issuing entity or any other party will have any liability for any aspect of the records relating to or payments made on account of beneficial interests in the certificates held by Cede & Co., as nominee for DTC, or for maintaining, supervising or reviewing any records relating to such beneficial interests.

 

65


Table of Contents

How Securitized Utility Tariff Bond Payments Will Be Credited by Clearstream and Euroclear

Payments with respect to securitized utility tariff bonds held through Clearstream or Euroclear will be credited to the cash accounts of Clearstream customers or Euroclear participants in accordance with the applicable system’s rules and operating procedures, to the extent received by its depositary. Those payments will be subject to tax reporting in accordance with relevant United States tax laws and regulations. Please read “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences” in this prospectus. Clearstream or the Euroclear operator, as the case may be, will take any other action permitted to be taken by a bondholder under the indenture on behalf of a Clearstream customer or Euroclear participant only in accordance with its applicable rules and operating procedures and subject to its depositary’s ability to effect those actions on its behalf through DTC.

Although DTC, Clearstream and Euroclear have agreed to the foregoing procedures in order to facilitate transfers of the securitized utility tariff bonds among participants of DTC, Clearstream and Euroclear, they are under no obligation to perform or continue to perform those procedures, and those procedures may be discontinued at any time.

Definitive Securitized Utility Tariff Bonds

The issuing entity will issue securitized utility tariff bonds in registered, certificated form to bondholders, or their nominees, rather than to DTC, only under the circumstances provided in the indenture, which will include: (1) the issuing entity advising the trustee in writing that DTC is no longer willing or able to properly discharge its responsibilities as nominee and depositary with respect to the book-entry securitized utility tariff bonds and that the issuing entity is unable to locate a recovery successor, (2) the issuing entity electing to terminate the book-entry system through DTC, with written notice to the trustee, or (3) after the occurrence of an event of default under the indenture, holders of securitized utility tariff bonds aggregating not less than a majority of the aggregate outstanding principal amount of the securitized utility tariff bonds maintained as book-entry securitized utility tariff bonds advising the issuing entity, the trustee, and DTC in writing that the continuation of a book-entry system through DTC (or a successor) is no longer in the best interests of those bondholders. Upon issuance of definitive securitized utility tariff bonds, the securitized utility tariff bonds evidenced by such definitive securitized utility tariff bonds will be transferable directly (and not exclusively on a book-entry basis) and registered holders will deal directly with the trustee with respect to transfers, notices and payments.

Upon surrender by DTC of the definitive securities representing the securitized utility tariff bonds and instructions for registration, the issuing entity will sign and the trustee will authenticate and deliver the securitized utility tariff bonds in the form of definitive securitized utility tariff bonds, and thereafter the trustee will recognize the registered holders of the definitive securitized utility tariff bonds as bondholders under the indenture.

The trustee will make payment of principal of and interest on the securitized utility tariff bonds directly to bondholders in accordance with the procedures set forth herein and in the indenture. The trustee will make interest payments and principal payments to bondholders in whose names the definitive securitized utility tariff bonds were registered at the close of business on the related record date. The trustee will make payments by wire transfer to the bondholder as described in the indenture or in such other manner as may be provided in the series supplement. The trustee will make the final payment on any securitized utility tariff bond (whether definitive securitized utility tariff bonds or notes registered in the name of Cede & Co.), however, only upon presentation and surrender of the securitized utility tariff bond on the final payment date at the office or agency that is specified in the notice of final payment to bondholders. The trustee will provide the notice to registered bondholders not later than the fifth day prior to the final payment date.

Definitive bonds will be transferable and exchangeable at the offices of the transfer agent and registrar, which initially will be the trustee. There will be no service charge for any registration of transfer or exchange, but the transfer agent and registrar may require payment of a sum sufficient to cover any tax or other governmental charge imposed in connection therewith.

 

66


Table of Contents

Access of Bondholders

Upon written request of any bondholder or group of bondholders of securitized utility tariff bonds evidencing not less than 10 percent of the aggregate outstanding principal amount of the securitized utility tariff bonds, the trustee will afford the bondholder or bondholders making such request a copy of a current list of bondholders for purposes of communicating with other bondholders with respect to their rights under the indenture.

The indenture does not provide for any annual or other meetings of bondholders.

Reports to Bondholders

On or prior to each payment date, special payment date or any other date specified in the indenture for payments with respect to any tranche of securitized utility tariff bonds, the servicer will deliver to the trustee, and the trustee will make available on its website (currently located at https://gctinvestorreporting.bnymellon.com), a statement prepared by the servicer with respect to the payment to be made on the payment date, special payment date or other date, as the case may be, setting forth the following information:

 

   

the amount of the payment to bondholders allocable to (1) principal and (2) interest,

 

   

the aggregate outstanding principal balance of the securitized utility tariff bonds, before and after giving effect to payments allocated to principal reported immediately above,

 

   

the difference, if any, between the amount specified immediately above and the principal amount scheduled to be outstanding on that date according to the related expected sinking fund schedule,

 

   

any other transfers and payments to be made on such payment date, including amounts paid to the trustee and the servicer, and

 

   

the amounts on deposit in the capital subaccount and the excess funds subaccount, after giving effect to the foregoing payments.

Unless and until securitized utility tariff bonds are no longer issued in book-entry form, the reports will be provided to the depository for the securitized utility tariff bonds, or its nominee, as sole beneficial owner of the securitized utility tariff bonds. The reports will be available to bondholders upon written request to the trustee or the servicer. Such reports will not constitute financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The financial information provided to bondholders will not be examined and reported upon by an independent public accountant. In addition, an independent public accountant will not provide an opinion on the financial information.

Within the prescribed period of time for tax reporting purposes after the end of each calendar year during the term of the securitized utility tariff bonds, the trustee, so long as it is acting as paying agent and transfer agent and registrar for the securitized utility tariff bonds, will, upon written request by the issuing entity or any bondholder, mail to persons who at any time during the calendar year were bondholders and received any payment on the securitized utility tariff bonds, a statement containing certain information for the purposes of the bondholder’s preparation of United States federal and state income tax returns.

SEC Filings; Website Disclosure

The issuing entity will, to the extent permitted by and consistent with the issuing entity’s legal obligations under applicable law, cause to be posted on a website associated with Evergy Missouri West periodic reports containing to the extent such information is reasonably available to it:

 

   

the final prospectus for the securitized utility tariff bonds;

 

   

a statement of securitized utility tariff charge remittances made to the trustee;

 

   

a statement reporting the balances in the collection account and in each subaccount of the collection account as of the end of each quarter or the most recent date available;

 

   

a statement showing the balance of outstanding securitized utility tariff bonds that reflects the actual periodic payments made on the securitized utility tariff bonds during the applicable period;

 

67


Table of Contents
   

the servicer’s certificate delivered for the securitized utility tariff bonds pursuant to the servicing agreement;

 

   

the monthly servicer’s certificate delivered for the securitized utility tariff bonds pursuant to the servicing agreement;

 

   

the reconciliation certificate as required to be submitted pursuant to the servicing agreement;

 

   

the text (or a link to the website where a reader can find the text) of each true-up submission in respect of the outstanding securitized utility tariff bonds and the results of each such true-up submission;

 

   

any change in the long-term or short-term credit ratings of the servicer assigned by the rating agencies;

 

   

material legislative or regulatory developments directly relevant to the securitized utility tariff bonds; and

 

   

any reports and other information that the issuing entity is required to file with the SEC under the Exchange Act.

Information contained on such website (other than the materials specifically incorporated by reference herein) is not part of this registration statement or any report that Evergy Missouri West files with, or furnishes to, the SEC. Evergy Missouri West and the issuing entity are providing the address to this website solely for the information of investors and does not intend to address to be an active link.

Conditions of Issuance of Additional Securitized Utility Tariff Bonds

Evergy Missouri West has covenanted under the sale agreement that the execution of a joinder to the intercreditor agreement and satisfaction of the rating agency condition are conditions precedent to the sale of property by Evergy Missouri West consisting of non-bypassable charges payable by customers comparable to the securitized utility tariff property sold by Evergy Missouri West pursuant to the sale agreement. Please read “Security for the Securitized Utility Tariff Bonds—How Funds in the Collection Account will be Allocated”, “Security for the Securitized Utility Tariff Bonds—Intercreditor Agreement” and “Sale Agreement—Covenants of the Seller” in this prospectus.

The Issuing Entity and the Trustee May Modify the Indenture

Modifications of the Indenture that do not Require Consent of Bondholders

From time to time, and without the consent of the bondholders (but with prior notice to the rating agencies and when authorized by an issuing entity order), the issuing entity and the trustee may enter into one or more agreements supplemental to the indenture for various purposes described in the indenture, including:

 

   

to correct or amplify the description of any property including, without limitation, the collateral subject to the indenture, or to better convey, assure and confirm to the trustee the property subject to the indenture, or to add additional property;

 

   

to evidence the succession of another person to us in accordance with the terms of the indenture and the assumption by any such successor of the covenants in the indenture and in the securitized utility tariff bonds;

 

   

to add to the covenants for the benefit of the bondholders and the trustee, or surrender any right or power conferred to the issuing entity with the indenture;

 

   

to convey, transfer, assign, mortgage or pledge any property to or with the trustee;

 

   

to cure any ambiguity or mistake or correct or supplement any provision in the indenture or in any supplemental indenture which may be inconsistent with any other provision in the indenture or in any supplemental indenture or to make any other provisions with respect to matters or questions arising under the indenture or in any supplemental indenture; provided, however, that (i) such action will not, as evidenced by an opinion of counsel, adversely affect in any material respect the interests of the bondholders and (ii) the rating agency condition shall have been satisfied with respect thereto;

 

68


Table of Contents
   

to evidence and provide for the acceptance of the appointment under the indenture of a successor trustee with respect to the securitized utility tariff bonds and to add or change any of the provisions of the indenture as shall be necessary to facilitate the administration of the trusts thereunder by more than one trustee;

 

   

to modify, eliminate or add to the provisions of the indenture to such extent as shall be necessary to effect qualification under the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, as amended (the “Trust Indenture Act”), or under any similar or successor federal statute hereafter enacted;

 

   

to qualify the securitized utility tariff bonds for registration with a clearing agency;

 

   

to satisfy any rating agency requirements;

 

   

to make any amendment to the indenture or the securitized utility tariff bonds relating to the transfer and legending of the securitized utility tariff bonds to comply with applicable securities laws; and

 

   

to conform the text of the indenture or the securitized utility tariff bonds to any provision of the registration statement filed by the issuing entity with the SEC with respect to the issuance of the securitized utility tariff bonds to the extent that such provision was intended to be a verbatim recitation of a provision of the indenture or the securitized utility tariff bonds.

The issuing entity may also, without the consent of the bondholders, enter into one or more other agreements supplemental to the indenture so long as (i) the supplemental agreement does not, as evidenced by an opinion of counsel experienced in structured finance transactions, adversely affect the interests of any holders of securitized utility tariff bonds then outstanding in any material respect and (ii) the rating agency condition shall have been satisfied with respect thereto.

Modifications of the Indenture that Require the Approval of Bondholders

The issuing entity may, with the consent of bondholders holding not less than a majority of the aggregate outstanding principal amount of the securitized utility tariff bonds (and with prior notice to the rating agencies), enter into one or more indentures supplemental to the indenture for the purpose of, among other things, adding any provisions to or changing in any manner or eliminating any of the provisions of the indenture. In determining whether a majority of holders have consented, securitized utility tariff bonds owned by the issuing entity, Evergy Missouri West or any affiliate of the issuing entity shall be disregarded, except that, in determining whether the trustee shall be protected in relying upon any such consent, the trustee shall only be required to disregard any securitized utility tariff bonds it actually knows to be so owned. No supplement, however, may, without the consent of each bondholder of each tranche affected thereby, take certain actions enumerated in the indenture, including:

 

   

change the date of payment of any installment of principal of or premium, if any, or interest on any securitized utility tariff bond of such tranche, or reduce in any manner the principal amount thereof, the interest rate thereon or the premium, if any, with respect thereto;

 

   

change the provisions of the indenture and any applicable supplemental indenture relating to the application of collections on, or the proceeds of the sale of, the collateral to payment of principal of or premium, if any, or interest on the securitized utility tariff bonds or tranche, or change the coin or currency in which any securitized utility tariff bond or any interest thereon is payable;

 

   

reduce the percentage of the aggregate amount of the outstanding securitized utility tariff bonds, or of a tranche thereof, the consent of the bondholders of which is required for any supplemental indenture, or the consent of the bondholders of which is required for any waiver of compliance with those provisions of the indenture specified therein or of defaults specified therein and their consequences provided for in the indenture or modify certain aspects of the definition of the term “outstanding”;

 

   

reduce the percentage of the outstanding amount of the securitized utility tariff bonds or tranche the holders of which are required to consent to direct the trustee to sell or liquidate the collateral;

 

   

modify any of the provisions of the indenture in a manner so as to affect the amount of any payment of interest, principal or premium, if any, payable on any securitized utility tariff bond of such tranche on any payment date or change the expected sinking fund schedules or final maturity dates of any securitized utility tariff bonds of such tranche;

 

69


Table of Contents
   

decrease the required capital amount;

 

   

permit the creation of any lien ranking prior to or on a parity with the lien of the indenture with respect to any of the collateral for the securitized utility tariff bonds or tranche or, except as otherwise permitted or contemplated in the indenture, terminate the lien of the indenture on any property at any time subject thereto or deprive the holder of any securitized utility tariff bond of the security provided by the lien of the indenture;

 

   

cause any material adverse federal income tax consequence to the seller, the issuing entity, the manager, the trustee or the beneficial owners of the securitized utility tariff bonds; or

 

   

impair the right to institute suit for the enforcement of those provisions of the indenture specified therein regarding payment or application of funds.

Promptly following the execution of any supplement to the indenture requiring the approval of the bondholders, the issuing entity will furnish either a copy of such supplement or written notice of the substance of the supplement to each bondholder, and a copy of such supplement to each rating agency.

Notification of the Rating Agencies, the Trustee and the Bondholders of Any Modification

If the issuing entity, Evergy Missouri West or the servicer or any other party to the applicable agreement:

 

   

proposes to amend, modify, waive, supplement, terminate or surrender, or agree to any other amendment, modification, waiver, supplement, termination or surrender of, the terms of the sale agreement, the administration agreement or the servicing agreement; or

 

   

waives timely performance or observance by Evergy Missouri West or the servicer under the sale agreement, the administration agreement or the servicing agreement;

in each case in a way which would materially and adversely affect the interests of bondholders, the issuing entity must first notify the rating agencies of the proposed amendment and satisfy the rating agency condition. Upon satisfaction of the rating agency condition, the issuing entity must thereafter notify the trustee in writing, and the trustee will be required to notify the bondholders of the proposed amendment and whether the rating agency condition has been satisfied with respect thereto. The trustee will consent to this proposed amendment, modification, supplement or waiver only with the written consent of the holders of a majority of the outstanding principal amount of the securitized utility tariff bonds of the tranches materially and adversely affected thereby. In determining whether a majority of holders have consented, securitized utility tariff bonds owned by the issuing entity, Evergy Missouri West or any affiliate of the issuing entity shall be disregarded, except that, in determining whether the trustee shall be protected in relying upon any such consent, the trustee shall only be required to disregard any securitized utility tariff bonds it actually knows to be so owned.

Modifications to the Sale Agreement, the Administration Agreement and the Servicing Agreement

With the prior written consent of the trustee, the sale agreement, the administration agreement and the servicing agreement may be amended, so long as the rating agency condition is satisfied in connection therewith, at any time and from time to time, without the consent of the bondholders. However, any such amendment may not adversely affect the interest of any bondholder in any material respect without the consent of the holders of a majority of the outstanding principal amount of the securitized utility tariff bonds. In determining whether a majority of holders have consented, securitized utility tariff bonds owned by the issuing entity, Evergy Missouri West or any affiliate of the issuing entity shall be disregarded, except that, in determining whether the trustee shall be protected in relying upon any such consent, the trustee shall only be required to disregard any securitized utility tariff bonds it actually knows to be so owned.

 

70


Table of Contents

In addition, the sale agreement, the administration agreement and the servicing agreement may be amended with ten business days’ prior written notice given to the rating agencies, with the prior written consent of the trustee (other than with respect to the sale agreement and the administration agreement, and which consent shall be given in reliance on an opinion of counsel and an officer’s certificate stating that such amendment is permitted or authorized under and adopted in accordance with the provisions of the applicable agreement and that all conditions precedent have been satisfied, upon which the trustee may conclusively rely), but without the consent of the bondholders, (i) to cure any ambiguity, to correct or supplement any provisions in the applicable agreement or for the purpose of adding any provisions to or changing in any manner or eliminating any of the provisions in such agreement or of modifying in any manner the rights of the bondholders; provided, however, that such action shall not, as evidenced by an officer’s certificate delivered to the issuing entity and the trustee, adversely affect in any material respect the interests of any bondholder or (ii) to conform the provisions of the applicable agreement to the description of such agreement in this prospectus. Promptly after the execution of any such amendment or consent, the issuing entity shall furnish copies of such amendment or consent to each of the rating agencies.

Enforcement of the Sale Agreement, the Administration Agreement, the Servicing Agreement and the Intercreditor Agreement

The indenture provides that the issuing entity will take all lawful actions to enforce the issuing entity’s rights under the sale agreement, the administration agreement and the servicing agreement; provided, that such action shall not adversely affect the interests of bondholders in any material respect. The indenture also provides that the issuing entity will take all lawful actions to compel or secure the performance and observance by Evergy Missouri West, the administrator and the servicer of their respective obligations to the issuing entity under or in connection with the sale agreement, the administration agreement, the servicing agreement and any intercreditor agreement. So long as no event of default occurs and is continuing, the issuing entity may exercise any and all rights, remedies, powers and privileges lawfully available to the issuing entity under or in connection with the sale agreement, the administration agreement, the servicing agreement and any intercreditor agreement. However, if the issuing entity or the servicer propose to amend, modify, waive, supplement, terminate or surrender in any material respect, or agree to any material amendment, modification, supplement, termination, waiver or surrender of, the process for adjusting the securitized utility tariff charges, the issuing entity must notify the trustee in writing and the trustee must notify the bondholders of this proposal. The intercreditor agreement provides that Evergy Missouri West will allocate and remit funds from the collection account (i) in the case of collections relating to the collateral pledged to secure the securitized utility tariff bonds to the securitization collection account at the times and in the manner specified in the basic documents; and (ii) in the case of collections relating to the receivables, to the receivables account at the times and in the manner specified in the basic documents; provided, that if a remittance of collections by a customer is less than the aggregate amount due and payable by each customer. In addition, the trustee may consent to this proposal only with the written consent of the holders of a majority of the principal amount of the outstanding securitized utility tariff bonds of the tranches materially and adversely affected thereby and only if the rating agency condition is satisfied. In determining whether a majority of holders have consented, securitized utility tariff bonds owned by the issuing entity, Evergy Missouri West or any affiliate of the issuing entity shall be disregarded, except that, in determining whether the trustee shall be protected in relying upon any such consent, the trustee shall only be required to disregard any securitized utility tariff bonds it actually knows to be so owned.

If an event of default occurs and is continuing, the trustee may, and, at the written direction of the holders of a majority of the outstanding amount of all affected tranches of securitized utility tariff bonds, will, exercise all of the issuing entity’s rights, remedies, powers, privileges and claims against Evergy Missouri West, the seller, the administrator and servicer, under or in connection with the sale agreement, administration agreement and servicing agreement, and any right of the issuing entity to take this action shall be suspended.

The Issuing Entity’s Covenants

The issuing entity may not consolidate with or merge into any other entity, unless:

 

   

the entity formed by or surviving the consolidation or merger is organized under the laws of the United States or any state;

 

   

the entity expressly assumes, by a supplemental indenture, the performance or observance of all of the issuing entity’s agreements and covenants under the indenture and the series supplement;

 

71


Table of Contents
   

the entity expressly assumes all of the issuing entity’s obligations and succeeds to all of the issuing entity’s rights under the sale agreement, servicing agreement and any other basic document to which the issuing entity is a party;

 

   

no default, event of default or servicer default under the indenture has occurred and is continuing immediately after the merger or consolidation;

 

   

the rating agency condition will have been satisfied with respect to the merger or consolidation;

 

   

the issuing entity has delivered to Evergy Missouri West, the trustee and the rating agencies an opinion or opinions of outside tax counsel (as selected by the issuing entity, in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to Evergy Missouri West, and which may be based on a ruling from the IRS) to the effect that the consolidation or merger will not result in a material adverse federal or state income tax consequence to the issuing entity, Evergy Missouri West, the trustee or the then-existing bondholders;

 

   

any action as is necessary to maintain the lien and the first priority perfected security interest in the collateral created by the indenture and the series supplement has been taken, as evidenced by an opinion of counsel of external counsel; and

 

   

the issuing entity has delivered to the trustee an officer’s certificate and an opinion of counsel of external counsel, each stating that all conditions precedent in the indenture provided for relating to the transaction have been complied with.

The issuing entity may not sell, convey, exchange, transfer or otherwise dispose of any of its properties or assets included in the collateral to any person or entity, unless:

 

   

the person or entity acquiring the properties and assets:

 

   

is a United States citizen or an entity organized under the laws of the United States or any state;

 

   

expressly assumes, by a supplemental indenture, the performance or observance of all of the issuing entity’s agreements and covenants under the indenture and the series supplement;

 

   

expressly agrees by the supplemental indenture that all right, title and interest so conveyed or transferred will be subject and subordinate to the rights of bondholders;

 

   

unless otherwise specified in the supplemental indenture referred to above, expressly agrees to indemnify, defend and hold the issuing entity and the trustee harmless against and from any loss, liability or expense arising under or related to the indenture, the series supplement and the securitized utility tariff bonds (including the enforcement cost of such indemnity);

 

   

expressly agrees by means of the supplemental indenture that the person (or if a group of persons, then one specified person) will make all filings with the SEC (and any other appropriate person) required by the Exchange Act in connection with the securitized utility tariff bonds; and

 

   

if such sale, conveyance, exchange, transfer or disposal relates to the issuing entity’s rights and obligations under the sale agreement or the servicing agreement, such person or entity assumes all obligations and succeeds to all of the issuing entity’s rights under the sale agreement and the servicing agreement, as applicable;

 

   

no default, event of default or servicer default under the indenture has occurred and is continuing immediately after the transactions;

 

   

the rating agency condition has been satisfied with respect to such transaction;

 

   

it has delivered to Evergy Missouri West, the trustee and the rating agencies an opinion or opinions of outside tax counsel (as selected by the issuing entity, in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to Evergy Missouri West, and which may be based on a ruling from the IRS) to the effect that the disposition will not result in a material adverse federal or state income tax consequence to the issuing entity, Evergy Missouri West, the trustee or the then-existing bondholders;

 

   

any action as is necessary to maintain the lien and the first priority perfected security interest in the collateral created by the indenture and the series supplement has been taken as evidenced by an opinion of counsel of external counsel; and

 

72


Table of Contents
   

the issuing entity has delivered to the trustee an officer’s certificate and an opinion of counsel of external counsel, each stating that the conveyance or transfer complies with the indenture and the series supplement and all conditions precedent therein provided for relating to the transaction have been complied with.

The issuing entity will not, among other things, for so long as any securitized utility tariff bonds are outstanding:

 

   

except as expressly permitted by the indenture, sell, transfer, exchange or otherwise dispose of any of its assets unless directed to do so by the trustee;

 

   

claim any credit on, or make any deduction from the principal or premium, if any, or interest payable in respect of, the securitized utility tariff bonds (other than amounts properly withheld from such payments under the Internal Revenue Code or other tax laws) or assert any claim against any present or former bondholder by reason of the payment of the taxes levied or assessed upon any part of the collateral;

 

   

terminate its existence, or dissolve or liquidate in whole or in part, except as permitted above;

 

   

permit the validity or effectiveness of the indenture or the series supplement to be impaired;

 

   

permit the lien of the indenture and the series supplement to be amended, hypothecated, subordinated, terminated or discharged or permit any person to be released from any covenants or obligations with respect to the securitized utility tariff bonds except as may be expressly permitted by the indenture;

 

   

permit any lien, charge, claim, security interest, mortgage, pledge, equity or other encumbrance, other than the lien and security interest granted under the indenture or the series supplement, to be created on or extend to or otherwise arise upon or burden the collateral or any part thereof or any interest therein or the proceeds thereof (other than tax liens arising by operation of law with respect to amounts not yet due);

 

   

permit the lien granted under the indenture or the series supplement not to constitute a valid first priority perfected security interest in the related collateral;

 

   

elect to be classified as an association taxable as a corporation for federal tax purposes, file any tax return, make any election or take any other action inconsistent with the issuing entity’s treatment, for federal income tax purposes and, to the extent consistent with applicable state tax law, state income and franchise tax purposes, as a disregarded entity that is not separate from the issuing entity’s sole member;

 

   

change its name, identity or structure or the location of the issuing entity’s chief executive office, unless at least ten (10) business days prior to the effective date of any such change, the issuing entity delivers to the trustee (with copies to each rating agency) such documents, instruments or agreements, executed by the issuing entity, as are necessary to reflect such change and to continue the perfection of the security interest of the indenture or the series supplement;

 

   

take any action which is subject to the rating agency condition if such action would result in a downgrade, suspension or withdrawal of the then-current ratings assigned to the securitized utility tariff bonds; or

 

   

issue any securitized utility tariff bonds (other than the securitized utility tariff bonds offered hereby).

The issuing entity may not engage in any business other than financing, purchasing, owning and managing securitized utility tariff property and the other collateral and the issuance of the securitized utility tariff bonds in the manner contemplated by the financing order and the basic documents.

The issuing entity will not issue, incur, assume, guarantee or otherwise become liable for any indebtedness except for the securitized utility tariff bonds. Also, the issuing entity will not, except as contemplated by the securitized utility tariff bonds and the basic documents, make any loan or advance or credit to, or guarantee, endorse or otherwise become contingently liable in connection with the obligations, stocks or dividends of, or own, purchase, repurchase or acquire (or agree contingently to do so) any stock, obligations, assets or securities of, or any other interest in, or make any capital contribution to, any other person. The issuing entity will not, make any expenditure (by long-term or operating lease or otherwise) for capital assets (either realty or personalty).

 

73


Table of Contents

The issuing entity will not make any payments, distributions, dividends or redemptions to any holder of the issuing entity’s equity interests in respect of that interest except in accordance with the indenture.

The issuing entity will cause the servicer to deliver to the trustee the annual accountant’s certificates, compliance certificates, reports regarding distributions and statements to bondholders required by the servicing agreement.

Events of Default; Rights Upon Event of Default

An “event of default with respect to the securitized utility tariff bonds is defined in the indenture as any one of the following events:

 

   

a default for five business days in the payment of any interest on any securitized utility tariff bond (whether such failure to pay interest is caused by a shortfall in securitized utility tariff charges received or otherwise);

 

   

a default in the payment of the then unpaid principal of any securitized utility tariff bond of any tranche on the final maturity date for that tranche;

 

   

a default in the observance or performance of any of the issuing entity’s covenants or agreements made in the indenture (other than defaults described above) and the continuation of any default for a period of 30 days after the earlier of (i) the date that written notice of the default is given to the issuing entity by the trustee or to the issuing entity and the trustee by the holders of at least 25% in principal amount of the securitized utility tariff bonds then-outstanding or (ii) the date that the issuing entity had actual knowledge of the default;

 

   

any representation or warranty made by the issuing entity in the indenture or in any certificate delivered pursuant to the indenture or in connection with the indenture having been incorrect in any material respect as of the time made, and such breach not having been cured within 30 days after the earlier of (i) the date that notice of the breach is given to the issuing entity by the trustee or to the issuing entity and the trustee by the holders of at least 25% in principal amount of the securitized utility tariff bonds then-outstanding or (ii) the date that the issuing entity had actual knowledge of the default;

 

   

certain events of bankruptcy, insolvency, receivership or liquidation of the issuing entity; or

 

   

a breach by the State of Missouri or any of its agencies (including the MPSC), officers or employers that violates or is not in accordance with the State Pledge.

If an event of default (other than as specified in the sixth bullet point above) should occur and be continuing with respect to the securitized utility tariff bonds, the trustee or holders of not less than a majority in principal amount of the securitized utility tariff bonds then-outstanding may declare the unpaid principal of the securitized utility tariff bonds and all accrued and unpaid interest thereon to be immediately due and payable. However, the nature of the issuing entity’s business will result in payment of principal upon an acceleration of the securitized utility tariff bonds being made as funds become available. Please read “Risk Factors—Risks Associated with the Unusual Nature of the Securitized Utility Tariff Property— Foreclosure of the trustee’s lien on the securitized utility tariff property for the securitized utility tariff bonds might not be practical, and acceleration of the securitized utility tariff bonds before maturity might have little practical effect” and “Risk Factors—You may experience material payment delays or incur a loss on your investment in the securitized utility tariff bonds because the source of funds for payment is limited” in this prospectus. The holders of a majority in principal amount of the securitized utility tariff bonds may rescind that declaration under certain circumstances set forth in the indenture. Additionally, the trustee may exercise all of the issuing entity’s rights, remedies, powers, privileges and claims against the seller or the servicer under or in connection with the sale agreement, the servicing agreement and the administration agreement (at the direction of a majority of bondholders of the outstanding amount of the securitized utility tariff bonds). If an event of default as specified in the sixth bullet above has occurred, the servicer will be obligated to institute (and the trustee, for the benefit of the bondholders, will be entitled and empowered to institute) any suits, actions or proceedings at law, in equity or otherwise, to enforce the State Pledge and to collect any monetary damages as a result of a breach thereof, and each of the servicer and the trustee may prosecute any suit, action or proceeding to final judgment or decree. The costs of

 

74


Table of Contents

any such action will be payable from securitized utility tariff charge collections as an operating expense in accordance with the priorities described in “Security for the Securitized Utility Tariff Bonds—How Funds in the Collection Account will be Allocated” in this prospectus. The servicer will have no obligations to undertake such action if it is not being reimbursed on a current basis for its costs and expenses in taking such actions, and shall not be required to advance its own funds to satisfy its obligations hereunder. The costs of any such action would be payable by the seller pursuant to the sale agreement. Except for an event of default specified in the first two bullet points above, the trustee will not be deemed to have knowledge of any event of default or a breach of representation or warranty unless a responsible officer of the trustee has actual knowledge of the default or the trustee has received written notice of the default in accordance with the indenture.

If the securitized utility tariff bonds have been declared to be due and payable following an event of default, the trustee may elect to have the issuing entity maintain possession of all or a portion of such securitized utility tariff property and continue to apply securitized utility tariff charge collections as if there had been no declaration of acceleration. There is likely to be a limited market, if any, for the securitized utility tariff property following a foreclosure, in light of the event of default, the unique nature of the securitized utility tariff property as an asset and other factors discussed in this prospectus. In addition, the trustee is prohibited from selling the securitized utility tariff property following an event of default, other than a default in the payment of any principal or a default for five business days or more in the payment of any interest on any securitized utility tariff bond, which requires the direction of holders of a majority in principal amount of the securitized utility tariff bonds, unless:

 

   

the holders of all the outstanding securitized utility tariff bonds consent to the sale;

 

   

the proceeds of the sale are sufficient to pay in full the principal of and the accrued interest on the outstanding securitized utility tariff bonds; or

 

   

the trustee determines that the proceeds of the collateral would not be sufficient on an ongoing basis to make all payments on the securitized utility tariff bonds as those payments would have become due if the securitized utility tariff bonds had not been declared due and payable, and the trustee obtains the written consent of the holders of 66 2/3% of the aggregate outstanding amount of the securitized utility tariff bonds.

Subject to the provisions of the indenture relating to the duties of the trustee (please read “The Trustee” in this prospectus), if an event of default occurs and is continuing, the trustee will be under no obligation to exercise any of the rights or powers under the securitized utility tariff bonds at the request or direction of any of the holders of securitized utility tariff bonds if the trustee reasonably believes it will not be adequately indemnified against the costs, expenses and liabilities which might be incurred by it in complying with the request. Subject to the provisions for indemnification and certain limitations contained in the indenture (please read “The Trustee” in this prospectus):

 

   

the holders of not less than a majority in principal amount of the outstanding securitized utility tariff bonds of an affected tranche will have the right to direct the time, method and place of conducting any proceeding for any remedy available to the trustee; and

 

   

the holders of not less than a majority in principal amount of the securitized utility tariff bonds may, in certain cases, waive any default with respect thereto, except a default in the payment of principal or interest or a default in respect of a covenant or provision of the indenture that cannot be modified without the consent of all of the holders of the outstanding securitized utility tariff bonds of all tranches affected thereby.

No holder of any securitized utility tariff bond will have the right to institute any proceeding, to avail itself of any remedies provided in the Securitization Law or of the right to foreclose on the collateral, or otherwise to enforce the lien and security interest on the collateral or to seek the appointment of a receiver or trustee, or for any other remedy under the indenture, unless:

 

   

the holder previously has given to the trustee written notice of a continuing event of default;

 

   

the holders of not less than a majority in principal amount of the outstanding securitized utility tariff bonds have made written request of the trustee to institute the proceeding in its own name as trustee;

 

75


Table of Contents
   

the holder or holders have offered the trustee satisfactory indemnity;

 

   

the trustee has for 60 days failed to institute the proceeding; and

 

   

no direction inconsistent with the written request has been given to the trustee during the 60-day period by the holders of a majority in principal amount of the outstanding securitized utility tariff bonds.

In addition, the trustee and the servicer will covenant and each bondholder will be deemed to covenant that it will not, prior to the date which is one year and one day after the termination of the indenture, institute against the issuing entity or against the issuing entity’s managers or the issuing entity’s member or members any bankruptcy, reorganization or other proceeding under any federal or state bankruptcy or similar law, subject to the right of the MPSC or a court of competent jurisdiction to order sequestration and payment of revenues arising with respect to the securitized utility tariff property.

Neither any manager nor the trustee in its individual capacity, nor any holder of any ownership interest in the issuing entity, nor any of their respective owners, beneficiaries, agents, officers, directors, employees, successors or assigns will, in the absence of an express agreement to the contrary, be personally liable for the payment of the principal of or interest on the securitized utility tariff bonds or for the issuing entity’s agreements contained in the indenture.

Actions by Bondholders

Subject to certain exceptions, the holders of not less than a majority of the aggregate outstanding amount of the securitized utility tariff bonds of the affected tranche or tranches will have the right to direct the time, method and place of conducting any proceeding for any remedy available to the trustee, of exercising any trust or power conferred on the trustee under the indenture; provided, that:

 

   

the direction is not in conflict with any rule of law or with the indenture and would not involve the trustee in personal liability or expense;

 

   

subject to the other conditions described above under “—Events of Default; Rights Upon Event of Default” in this prospectus, the consent of 100% of the bondholders is required to direct the trustee to sell the collateral (other than an event of default for failure to pay interest or principal at maturity);

 

   

if the trustee elects to retain the collateral in accordance with the indenture, then any direction to the trustee by less than 100% of the bondholders will be of no force and effect; and

 

   

the trustee may take any other action deemed proper by the trustee which is not inconsistent with the direction.

In circumstances under which the trustee is required to seek instructions from the holders of the securitized utility tariff bonds of any tranche with respect to any action or vote, the trustee will take the action or vote for or against any proposal in proportion to the principal amount of the corresponding tranche, as applicable, of securitized utility tariff bonds taking the corresponding position. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the indenture allows each bondholder to institute suit for the nonpayment of (1) the interest, if any, on its securitized utility tariff bonds which remains unpaid as of the applicable due date and (2) the unpaid principal, if any, of its securitized utility tariff bonds on the final maturity date therefor.

Annual Report of Trustee

If required by the Trust Indenture Act, the trustee will be required to mail each year to all bondholders a brief report. The report must state, among other things:

 

   

the trustee’s eligibility and qualification to continue as the trustee under the indenture;

 

   

any amounts advanced by it under the indenture;

 

   

the amount, interest rate and maturity date of specific indebtedness owing by the issuing entity to the trustee in the trustee’s individual capacity;

 

76


Table of Contents
   

the property and funds physically held by the trustee;

 

   

any additional issue of the securitized utility tariff bonds not previously reported; and

 

   

any action taken by it that materially affects the securitized utility tariff bonds and that has not been previously reported.

Annual Compliance Statement

The issuing entity will file annually with the trustee and the rating agencies a written statement as to whether it has fulfilled its obligations under the indenture.

Satisfaction and Discharge of Indenture

The indenture will cease to be of further effect with respect to the securitized utility tariff bonds and the trustee, on the issuing entity’s written demand and at its expense, will execute instruments acknowledging satisfaction and discharge of the indenture with respect to the securitized utility tariff bonds, when:

 

   

either (a) all securitized utility tariff bonds which have already been authenticated or delivered, with certain exceptions set forth in the indenture, have been delivered to the trustee for cancellation or (b) either (i) the scheduled final payment date has occurred with respect to all securitized utility tariff bonds not previously delivered to the trustee for cancellation or (ii) the issuing entity has irrevocably deposited in trust with the trustee cash and/or U.S. government obligations in an aggregate amount sufficient to pay principal, interest and premiums, if any, on the securitized utility tariff bonds and all other sums payable by the issuing entity with respect to the securitized utility tariff bonds when scheduled to be paid and to discharge the entire indebtedness on such securitized utility tariff bonds when due;

 

   

the issuing entity has paid all other sums payable by it under the indenture with respect to the securitized utility tariff bonds; and

 

   

the issuing entity has delivered to the trustee an officer’s certificate, an opinion of external counsel, and if required by the Trust Indenture Act or the trustee, a certificate from a firm of independent registered public accountants, each stating that there has been compliance with the conditions precedent in the indenture relating to the satisfaction and discharge of the indenture.

The Issuing Entity’s Legal and Covenant Defeasance Options

The issuing entity may, at any time, terminate all of its obligations under the indenture, referred to herein as the “legal defeasance option,” or terminate its obligations to comply with some of the covenants in the indenture, including some of the covenants described under “—The Issuing Entity’s Covenants” above and referred to herein as the issuing entity’s “covenant defeasance option.”

The issuing entity may exercise the legal defeasance option of the securitized utility tariff bonds notwithstanding its prior exercise of the covenant defeasance option. If the issuing entity exercises the legal defeasance option, the securitized utility tariff bonds will be entitled to payment only from the funds or other obligations set aside under the indenture for payment thereof on the scheduled final payment date or redemption date therefor as described below. The securitized utility tariff bonds will not be subject to payment through redemption or acceleration prior to the scheduled final payment date or redemption date, as applicable. If the issuing entity exercises the legal defeasance option, the final payment of the securitized utility tariff bonds may not be accelerated because of an event of default. If the issuing entity exercises the covenant defeasance option, the final payment of the securitized utility tariff bonds may not be accelerated because of an event of default relating to a default in the observance or performance of any of the issuing entity’s covenants or agreements made in the indenture.

The indenture provides that the issuing entity may exercise its legal defeasance option or its covenant defeasance option of securitized utility tariff bonds only if:

 

77


Table of Contents
   

the issuing entity irrevocably deposits or causes to be irrevocably deposited in trust with the trustee cash and/or U.S. government obligations in an aggregate amount sufficient to pay principal, interest and premium, if any, on the securitized utility tariff bonds other sums payable by the issuing entity under the indenture with respect to the securitized utility tariff bonds when scheduled to be paid and to discharge the entire indebtedness on the securitized utility tariff bonds when due;

 

   

the issuing entity delivers to the trustee a certificate from a nationally recognized firm of independent registered public accountants expressing its opinion that the payments of principal and interest on the U.S. government obligations when due and without reinvestment plus any deposited cash will provide cash at times and in sufficient amounts to pay in respect of the securitized utility tariff bonds:

 

   

principal in accordance with the expected sinking fund schedule therefor;

 

   

interest when due; and

 

   

all other sums payable by the issuing entity under the indenture with respect to the securitized utility tariff bonds,

 

   

in the case of the legal defeasance option, 95 days pass after the deposit is made and during the 95-day period no default relating to events of the issuing entity’s bankruptcy, insolvency, receivership or liquidation occurs and is continuing at the end of the period;

 

   

no default has occurred and is continuing on the day of this deposit and after giving effect thereto;

 

   

in the case of the legal defeasance option, the issuing entity delivers to the trustee an opinion of external counsel stating that: the issuing entity has received from, or there has been published by, the IRS a ruling, or since the date of execution of the indenture, there has been a change in the applicable federal income tax law, and in either case confirming that the holders of the securitized utility tariff bonds will not recognize income, gain or loss for federal income tax purposes as a result of the exercise of the legal defeasance option and will be subject to federal income tax on the same amounts, in the same manner and at the same times as would have been the case if the legal defeasance had not occurred;

 

   

in the case of the covenant defeasance option, the issuing entity delivers to the trustee an opinion of external counsel to the effect that the holders of the securitized utility tariff bonds will not recognize income, gain or loss for federal income tax purposes as a result of the exercise of the covenant defeasance option and will be subject to federal income tax on the same amounts, in the same manner and at the same times as would have been the case if the covenant defeasance had not occurred;

 

   

the issuing entity delivers to the trustee a certificate of one of its officers and an opinion of external counsel, each stating that all conditions precedent to the legal defeasance option or the covenant defeasance option, as applicable, have been complied with as required by the indenture;

 

   

the issuing entity delivers to the trustee an opinion of external counsel to the effect that (a) in a case under the Bankruptcy Code in which Evergy Missouri West (or any of its affiliates, other than the issuing entity) is the debtor, the court would hold that the deposited cash or U.S. government obligations would not be in the bankruptcy estate of Evergy Missouri West (or any of its affiliates, other than the issuing entity, that deposited the cash or U.S. government obligations); and (b) in the event Evergy Missouri West (or any of its affiliates, other than the issuing entity, that deposited the cash or U.S. government obligations) were to be a debtor in a case under the Bankruptcy Code, the court would not disregard the separate legal existence of Evergy Missouri West (or any of its affiliates, other than the issuing entity, that deposited the cash or U.S. government obligations) and the issuing entity so as to order substantive consolidation under the Bankruptcy Code of the issuing entity’s assets and liabilities with the assets and liabilities of Evergy Missouri West or such other affiliate; and

 

   

the rating agency condition has been satisfied with respect to the exercise of any legal defeasance option or covenant defeasance option.

 

78


Table of Contents

No Recourse to Others

No recourse may be taken directly or indirectly, by the holders with respect to the issuing entity’s obligations on the securitized utility tariff bonds, under the indenture or any supplement thereto or any certificate or other writing delivered in connection therewith, against (1) any owner of a beneficial interest in the issuing entity (including Evergy Missouri West) or (2) any shareholder, partner, owner, beneficiary, agent, officer, director or employee of the trustee, the managers or any owner of a beneficial interest in the issuing entity (including Evergy Missouri West) in its individual capacity, or of any successor or assign or any of them in their respective individual or corporate capacities, except as any such person may have expressly agreed in writing. Each holder by accepting a securitized utility tariff bond specifically confirms the nonrecourse nature of these obligations, and waives and releases all such liability. The waiver and release are part of the consideration for issuance of the securitized utility tariff bonds.

Notwithstanding any provision of the indenture or the series supplement to the contrary, bondholders shall look only to the collateral with respect to any amounts due to the bondholders under the indenture and the securitized utility tariff bonds, and, in the event such collateral is insufficient to pay in full the amounts owed on the securitized utility tariff bonds, shall have no recourse against the issuing entity in respect of such insufficiency.

 

79


Table of Contents

THE TRUSTEE

The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, National Association, a national banking association, will act as the trustee, the paying agent and the registrar for the securitized utility tariff bonds. The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, National Association has acted as trustee on numerous electrical corporation sponsored bond transactions. The indenture and series supplement will be administered from The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, National Association, Corporate Trust Department located at 2 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 700, Chicago, IL 60602 Attn: ABS Corporate Trust Administration.

The trustee (or any other eligible institution in any capacity under the indenture) may resign at any time upon not less than 30 days’ prior written notice to the issuing entity. The holders of a majority in principal amount of the outstanding amount of the securitized utility tariff bonds under the indenture may remove the trustee (or any other eligible institution in any capacity under the indenture) upon not less than 30 days’ prior written notice by so notifying the trustee (or such other eligible institution) and may appoint a successor trustee (or successor eligible institution in the applicable capacity). The issuing entity will remove the trustee if the trustee: (i) ceases to be eligible under the Trust Indenture Act; (ii) ceases to satisfy certain credit standards set forth in the indenture and the series supplement; (iii) becomes a debtor in a bankruptcy proceeding or is adjudicated insolvent or a receiver or other public officer takes charge of the trustee or its property; (iv) becomes incapable of acting; or (v) fails to provide to the issuing entity certain information pertaining to the trustee that it reasonably requests that is necessary for it to satisfy its reporting obligations under the securities laws. The issuing entity will remove any person who maintains the collection account or any other account established under the Indenture and fails to constitute an eligible institution with 30 days’ prior notice. If the trustee resigns or is removed or a vacancy exists in the office of trustee for any reason, the issuing entity will be obligated promptly to appoint a successor trustee eligible under the indenture, and notice of such appointment is required to be promptly given to each rating agency by the successor trustee. If any person (other than the trustee) acting in any capacity under the indenture as an eligible institution is removed, fails to constitute an eligible institution or if a vacancy exists in any such capacity for any reason, the issuing entity will promptly appoint a successor to such capacity that constitutes an eligible institution. No resignation or removal of the trustee (or any other person acting as an eligible institution) will become effective until acceptance of the appointment by a successor trustee (or a successor eligible institution). The issuing entity is responsible for payment of the expenses associated with any such removal or resignation.

The trustee will at all times satisfy the requirements of the Trust Indenture Act and Rule 3a-7 of the Investment Company Act of 1940 and have a combined capital and surplus of at least $50,000,000 and a long- term debt rating of BBB– (or the equivalent thereof) or better by all of the rating agencies rating the securitized utility tariff bonds and from which a rating is available. If the trustee consolidates with, merges or converts into, or transfers all or substantially all of its corporate trust business or assets to, another corporation or banking association, the resulting, surviving or transferee corporation or banking association will without any further action be the successor trustee.

The trustee shall not be liable for any action it takes or omits to take in good faith that it believes to be authorized or within its rights or powers; provided, that its conduct does not constitute willful misconduct, negligence or bad faith. The issuing entity has agreed to indemnify the trustee and its officers, directors, employees and agents against any and all cost, damage, loss, liability or expense (including attorney’s fees and expenses) incurred by it in connection with the administration of the trust and the performance of its duties under the indenture; provided, that the issuing entity is not required to pay any expense or indemnify against any loss, liability or expense incurred by the trustee through the trustee’s own willful misconduct, negligence or bad faith. Please read “Security for the Securitized Utility Tariff BondsHow Funds in the Collection Account will be Allocated” in this prospectus.

In the ordinary course of business, The Bank of New York Mellon, an affiliate of the trustee, is named as a defendant in legal actions. In connection with its role as trustee of certain residential mortgage-backed securitizations, or RMBS transactions, The Bank of New York Mellon has been named as a defendant in a number of legal actions brought by RMBS investors. These lawsuits allege that the trustee had expansive duties under the governing agreements, including the duty to investigate and pursue breach of representation and warranty claims against other parties to the RMBS transactions. While it is inherently difficult to predict the eventual outcomes of pending actions, The Bank of New York Mellon denies liability and intends to defend the litigations vigorously.

 

80


Table of Contents

The issuing entity, Evergy Missouri West and their respective affiliates may from time to time enter into normal banking and trustee relationships with The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, National Association and its affiliates. The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, National Association also acts as the trustee under an indenture under which Evergy Missouri West’s parent, Evergy, has issued and may issue debt securities in the future. Evergy Missouri West maintains bank deposits with The Bank of New York Mellon and may borrow money from the bank from time to time.

No relationships currently exist or existed during the past two years between Evergy Missouri West, the issuing entity and each of their respective affiliates, on the one hand, and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, National Association and its affiliates, on the other hand, that would be outside the ordinary course of business or on terms other than would be obtained in an arm’s length transaction with an unrelated third party.

 

81


Table of Contents

SECURITY FOR THE SECURITIZED UTILITY TARIFF BONDS

General

The securitized utility tariff bonds issued under the indenture will be non-recourse obligations and are payable solely from and secured solely by a pledge of and lien on the securitized utility tariff property and the other collateral as provided in the indenture. If and to the extent the securitized utility tariff property and the other assets of the trust estate are insufficient to pay all amounts owing with respect to the securitized utility tariff bonds, then the bondholders will generally have no claim in respect of such insufficiency against the issuing entity or any other person. By the acceptance of the securitized utility tariff bonds, the bondholders waive any such claim.

Pledge of Collateral

To secure the payment of principal of and interest on the securitized utility tariff bonds, the issuing entity will grant to the trustee a security interest in all of the issuing entity’s right, title and interest (whether now owned or hereafter acquired or arising) in and to the following property:

 

   

the securitized utility tariff property and all related securitized utility tariff charges;

 

   

the issuing entity’s rights under the true-up mechanism;

 

   

the issuing entity’s rights under a sale agreement pursuant to which it will acquire the securitized utility tariff property;

 

   

the issuing entity’s rights under the servicing agreement and any subservicing, agency, or collection agreements executed in connection with the servicing agreement;

 

   

the issuing entity’s rights under the administration agreement and intercreditor agreement;

 

   

the collection account for the securitized utility tariff bonds and all subaccounts of the collection account, and all amounts of cash instruments, investment property or other assets on deposit therein or credited thereto from time to time and all financial assets and securities entitlements carried therein or credited thereto;

 

   

all of the issuing entity’s other property related to the securitized utility tariff bonds, other than any amounts released to Evergy Missouri West by the trustee on any payment date relating to its return on capital of its capital contribution;

 

   

all present and future claims, demands, causes and choses in action in respect of any or all of the foregoing; and

 

   

all proceeds in respect of any or all of the foregoing.

The security interest does not extend to:

 

   

amounts released to Evergy Missouri West by the trustee on any payment date relating to its return on capital of its capital contribution;

 

   

amounts deposited in the capital subaccount or any other subaccount that have been released to the issuing entity or as it directs following retirement of securitized utility tariff bonds; and

 

   

amounts deposited with the issuing entity on the issuance date required for payment of costs of issuance with respect to the securitized utility tariff bonds (together with any interest earnings thereon).

The depositor refers to the foregoing assets in which the issuing entity, as assignee of the seller, will grant the trustee a security interest as the “collateral.”

 

82


Table of Contents

Security Interest in the Collateral

The Securitization Law provides that consensual security interests can be granted in securitized utility tariff property. The Securitization Law provides that a valid and enforceable security interest in securitized utility tariff property is created at the later of the time when (a) the MPSC has issued the financing order authorizing securitized utility tariff charges included in the securitized utility tariff property, (b) a security agreement is executed and delivered by the debtor granting such security interest, (c) the debtor has rights in the securitized utility tariff property or the power to transfer such securitized utility tariff property, or (d) value is received for the securitized utility tariff property. The security interest in the securitized utility tariff property is perfected when it has attached and when a financing statement has been filed with the Missouri Secretary of State, with a copy filed with the MPSC, in accordance with the Securitization Law.

Right of Foreclosure

The Securitization Law provides that if an event of default occurs under the securitized utility tariff bonds that are secured by a security interest in the securitized utility tariff property, the financing parties or their representatives, as secured parties, may foreclose or otherwise enforce the lien and security interest in the securitized utility tariff property securing the securitized utility tariff bonds as if they were secured parties under Article 9 of the UCC. In addition, if Evergy Missouri West defaults on any required remittance of securitized utility tariff charges, a court, upon application by an interested party, under the Securitization Law may order the sequestration and payment of securitized utility tariff charge collections to pledgees and transferees of securitized utility tariff property.

Description of Indenture Accounts

Collection Account

Pursuant to the indenture, the issuing entity will establish a segregated trust account in the name of the trustee with an eligible institution, for the securitized utility tariff bonds called the “collection account.” The collection account will be under the sole dominion and exclusive control of the trustee. The trustee will hold the collection account for the issuing entity’s benefit as well as for the benefit of the bondholders. The collection account for the securitized utility tariff bonds will consist of three subaccounts: a “general subaccount,” an “excess funds subaccount,” and a “capital subaccount,” which need not be separate bank accounts. For administrative purposes, the subaccounts may be established by the trustee as separate accounts which will be recognized individually as subaccounts and collectively as the collection account. All amounts in the collection account not allocated to any other subaccount will be allocated to the general subaccount. Unless the context indicates otherwise, references in this prospectus to the collection account include the collection account and each of the subaccounts contained therein.

The following institutions are eligible institutions for the establishment of the collection account:

 

   

the corporate trust department of the trustee, so long as any of the securities of the trustee have (i) either a short-term credit rating from Moody’s of at least “P-1” or a long-term unsecured debt rating from Moody’s of at least “A2” and (ii) a credit rating from S&P of at least “A”; or

 

   

a depository institution organized under the laws of the United States of America or any state (or any domestic branch of a foreign bank) (i) that has either (A) a long-term issuer rating of “AA-” or higher by S&P and “A2” or higher by Moody’s, or (B) a short-term issuer rating of “A-1” or higher by S&P and “P-1” or higher by Moody’s, or any other long-term, short-term or certificate of deposit rating acceptable to the rating agencies, and (ii) whose deposits are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

Eligible Investments for Funds in the Collection Account

Funds in the collection account may be invested only in such investments as meet the criteria described below and which mature on or before the business day preceding the next payment date:

 

   

direct obligations of, or obligations fully and unconditionally guaranteed as to timely payment by, the United States of America;

 

   

demand or time deposits of, unsecured certificates of deposit of, money market deposit accounts of or bankers’ acceptances issued by, any depository institution (including the trustee, acting in its commercial capacity) incorporated or organized under the laws of the United States of America or any state thereof and subject to the supervision and examination by U.S. federal or state banking authorities, so long as the commercial paper or other short-term debt obligations of such depository institution are, at the time of deposit, rated as least “A-1” and “P-1” or their equivalents by each of S&P and Moody’s, or such lower rating as will not result in the downgrading or withdrawal of the securitized utility tariff bonds;

 

83


Table of Contents
   

commercial paper (including commercial paper of the trustee, acting in its commercial capacity, and other than commercial paper issued by Evergy Missouri West or any of its affiliates) having, at the time of investment or contractual commitment to invest, a rating of at least “A-1” and “P-1” or their equivalents by each of S&P and Moody’s or such lower rating as will not result in the downgrading or withdrawal of the ratings of the securitized utility tariff bonds;

 

   

investments in money market funds which have a rating in the highest investment category granted thereby (including funds for which the trustee or any of its affiliates is investment manager or advisor) from Moody’s and S&P;

 

   

repurchase obligations with respect to any security that is a direct obligations of, or fully guaranteed by, the United States of America or certain of its agencies or instrumentalities, entered into with eligible institutions; or

 

   

repurchase obligations with respect to any security or whole loan entered into with an eligible institution or with a registered broker-dealer acting as principal and that meets certain ratings criteria.

The trustee will have access to the collection account for the purpose of making deposits in and withdrawals from the collection account in accordance with the indenture. The servicer will select the eligible investments in which funds will be invested, unless otherwise directed by the issuing entity.

The servicer will remit securitized utility tariff charge payments to the collection account in the manner described under “The Servicing Agreement—Remittances to Collection Account” in this prospectus.

General Subaccount

The general subaccount will hold all funds held in the collection account that are not held in the other two subaccounts. The servicer will remit all securitized utility tariff charge payments to the general subaccount. On each payment date, the trustee will draw on amounts in the general subaccount to pay the issuing entity’s expenses and to pay interest and make scheduled payments on the securitized utility tariff bonds, and to make other payments and transfers in accordance with the terms of the indenture. Funds in the general subaccount will be invested in the eligible investments described above.

Excess Funds Subaccount

The trustee, at the written direction of the servicer, will allocate to the excess funds subaccount securitized utility tariff charge collections available with respect to any payment date in excess of amounts necessary to make the payments specified on such payment date. The excess funds subaccount will also hold all investment earnings on the collection account (other than investment earnings on the capital subaccount) in excess of such amounts.

Capital Subaccount

In connection with the issuance of the securitized utility tariff bonds, the seller, in its capacity as the issuing entity’s sole owner, will contribute capital to the issuing entity in an amount equal to the “required capital level,” which will be not less than 0.50% of the principal amount of the securitized utility tariff bonds issued. This amount will be funded by the seller and not from the proceeds of the sale of the securitized utility tariff bonds, and will be deposited into the capital subaccount on the issuance date. In the event that amounts on deposit in the general subaccount and the excess funds subaccount are insufficient to make scheduled payments of principal and interest on the securitized utility tariff bonds and payments of fees and expenses contemplated by the first nine bullets under “—How Funds in the Collection Account will be Allocated” in this prospectus, the trustee will draw on amounts in the capital subaccount to make such payments up to the lesser of the amount of such insufficiency and the amounts on deposit in the capital subaccount. In the event of any such withdrawal, collected securitized utility tariff charges available on any subsequent payment date that are not necessary to pay scheduled payments of principal and interest on the securitized utility tariff bonds and payments of fees and expenses will be used to replenish any amounts drawn from the capital subaccount. If the securitized utility tariff bonds have been retired as of any payment date, the amounts on deposit in the capital subaccount will be released to the issuing entity, free of the lien of the indenture.

 

84


Table of Contents

How Funds in the Collection Account will be Allocated

On each payment date for the securitized utility tariff bonds (or any other date as directed by the servicer with respect to ongoing financing costs in clause (4) below payable prior to the next payment date), the trustee will with respect to the securitized utility tariff bonds, pay or allocate, solely at the written direction of the servicer, all amounts on deposit in the collection account (including investment earnings thereon) to pay the following amounts in the following priority:

 

  (1)

amounts owed by the issuing entity to the trustee, the trustee’s fees and expenses and any outstanding indemnity amounts owed to the trustee in an amount not to exceed $                 per annum (the “Trustee Cap”); provided, however, that the Trustee Cap shall be disregarded and inapplicable upon the acceleration of the securitized utility tariff bonds following the occurrence of an event of default;

 

  (2)

the servicing fee and any unpaid servicing fees from prior payment dates to the servicer as described under “The Servicing Agreement—Servicing Compensation” in this prospectus;

 

  (3)

the administration fee and an allocable share of the fees owed to the issuing entity’s independent manager;

 

  (4)

all of the issuing entity’s other ordinary periodic ongoing financing costs relating to the securitized utility tariff bonds, such as accounting and audit fees, rating agency fees, legal fees and certain reimbursable costs of the administrator under the administration agreement and of the servicer under the servicing agreement;

 

  (5)

interest then due on the securitized utility tariff bonds, including any past-due interest;

 

  (6)

principal then due and payable on the securitized utility tariff bonds as a result of an event of default or on the final maturity date for the securitized utility tariff bonds;

 

  (7)

scheduled principal payments of securitized utility tariff bonds according to its expected sinking fund schedule, together with any overdue scheduled principal payments, paid pro rata among the securitized utility tariff bonds if there is a deficiency;

 

  (8)

any remaining unpaid fees, expenses and indemnity amounts owed to the trustee;

 

  (9)

any other unpaid ongoing financing costs relating to the securitized utility tariff bonds and any remaining amounts owed pursuant to the basic documents;

 

  (10)

replenishment of any amounts drawn from the capital subaccount;

 

  (11)

provided that no event of default has occurred and is continuing, release to Evergy Missouri West an amount representing a return on capital of its capital contribution calculated at the weighted average cost of capital authorized from time to time by the MPSC in Evergy Missouri West’s rate proceedings plus applicable taxes;

 

  (12)

the remainder, if any, to the excess funds subaccount for distribution on subsequent payment dates; and

 

  (13)

after principal of and premium, if any, and interest on all securitized utility tariff bonds and all of the other foregoing amounts have been paid in full, the balance (including all amounts then held in the applicable capital subaccount and the applicable excess funds subaccount), if any, shall be paid to Evergy Missouri West free and clear from the lien of the indenture and the series supplement and credited to customers through normal ratemaking processes.

If on any payment date funds on deposit in the general subaccount are insufficient to make the payments contemplated by clauses (1) through (9) above, the trustee will first, draw from amounts on deposit in the excess funds subaccount, and second, draw from amounts on deposit in the capital subaccount, up to the amount of the shortfall, in order to make those payments in full. If the trustee uses amounts on deposit in the capital subaccount to pay those

 

85


Table of Contents

amounts or make those transfers, as the case may be, subsequent adjustments to the securitized utility tariff charges will take into account, among other things, the need to replenish those amounts. In addition, if on any payment date funds on deposit in the general subaccount are insufficient to make the transfer described in clause (10) above, the trustee will draw from amounts on deposit in the excess funds subaccount to make such transfer.    Please read “Risk Factors—Other Risks Associated with an Investment in the Securitized Utility Tariff Bonds Evergy Missouri Wests indemnification obligations under the sale and servicing agreements are limited and might not be sufficient to protect your investment in the securitized utility tariff bonds” in this prospectus.

If, on any payment date, available collections of the securitized utility tariff charges, together with available amounts in the subaccounts, are not sufficient to pay interest due on all outstanding securitized utility tariff bonds on that payment date, amounts available will be allocated pro rata based on the amount of interest payable. If, on any payment date, remaining collections of the securitized utility tariff charges, together with available amounts in the subaccounts, are not sufficient to pay principal due and payable on all outstanding securitized utility tariff bonds on that payment date, amounts available will be allocated pro rata based on the principal amount then due and payable. If, on any payment date, remaining collections of the securitized utility tariff charges, together with available amounts in the subaccounts, are not sufficient to pay principal scheduled to be paid on all outstanding securitized utility tariff bonds, amounts available will be allocated pro rata based on the principal amounts then scheduled to be paid on the payment date.

Intercreditor Agreement

Evergy Missouri West currently has an accounts receivable program under which it sells substantially all its accounts receivable (other than the securitized utility tariff charges, which are entitlements of the issuing entity and not the servicer, and which are excluded from this arrangement). Evergy Missouri West will enter into an intercreditor agreement with the parties to Evergy Missouri West accounts receivable program which will state that, (i) the securitized utility tariff charges are excluded from the assets sold under the accounts receivable sales program and (ii) replacement of the servicer will require the agreement of the trustees and the administrative agent under the accounts receivable sales program. In the sale agreement, Evergy Missouri West has covenanted that it will not enter into any future sale of charges owing by electric customers to issuing entities for the purpose of issuing additional securitized utility tariff bonds without entering into a joinder to the intercreditor agreement. Please read “The Sale Agreement—Covenants of the Seller” in this prospectus.

If the trustees are unable to agree on a replacement servicer, no trustee would be able to replace Evergy Missouri West or any successor as servicer; the parties must cooperate to appoint a replacement servicer within ten business days of the date of notice that the servicer shall be replaced. Please read “The Servicing Agreement—Remittances to Collection Account” in this prospectus.

 

86


Table of Contents

WEIGHTED AVERAGE LIFE AND YIELD CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE SECURITIZED UTILITY TARIFF BONDS

The rate of principal payments, the amount of each interest payment and the actual final payment date of each tranche of the securitized utility tariff bonds and the weighted average life thereof will depend primarily on the timing of receipt of collected securitized utility tariff charges by the trustee and the statutory true-up mechanism. The aggregate amount of collected securitized utility tariff charges and the rate of principal amortization on the securitized utility tariff bonds will depend, in part, on actual energy usage and energy demands, and the rate of delinquencies and write-offs. The securitized utility tariff charges are required to be adjusted from time to time based in part on the actual rate of collected securitized utility tariff charges. However, the issuing entity can give no assurance that the servicer will be able to forecast accurately actual electricity usage and the rate of delinquencies and write-offs or implement adjustments to the securitized utility tariff charges that will cause collected securitized utility tariff charges to be received at any particular rate. Please read “Risk Factors— Servicing Forecasting Risks—Inaccurate consumption or collection forecasting might reduce scheduled payments on the securitized utility tariff bonds” and “Evergy Missouri West’s Financing Order—Securitized Utility Tariff Charges—The Financing Order Requires the Servicer to Periodically ‘True-Up’ the Securitized Utility Tariff Charge” in this prospectus.

The securitized utility tariff bonds may be retired later than expected. Except in the event of an acceleration of the final payment date of the securitized utility tariff bonds after an event of default, however, the securitized utility tariff bonds will not be paid at a rate faster than that contemplated in the expected sinking fund schedule for each tranche of the securitized utility tariff bonds even if the receipt of collected securitized utility tariff charges is accelerated. Instead, receipts in excess of the amounts necessary to amortize the securitized utility tariff bonds in accordance with the applicable expected sinking fund schedules, to pay interest and related fees and expenses and to fund subaccounts of the collection account will be allocated to the excess funds subaccount. Amounts on deposit in the excess funds subaccount will be taken into consideration in calculating the next true-up adjustment. Acceleration of the final maturity date after an event of default in accordance with the terms thereof will result in payment of principal earlier than the related scheduled final payment dates. A payment on a date that is earlier than forecast might result in a shorter weighted average life, and a payment on a date that is later than forecast might result in a longer weighted average life. In addition, if a larger portion of the delayed payments on the securitized utility tariff bonds is received in later years, the securitized utility tariff bonds may have a longer weighted average life.

Weighted Average Life Sensitivity

Weighted average life refers to the average amount of time from the date of issuance of a security until each dollar of principal of the security has been repaid to the investor. The rate of principal payments on each tranche of securitized utility tariff bonds, the aggregate amount of each interest payment on each tranche of securitized utility tariff bonds and the actual final payment date of each tranche of securitized utility tariff bonds will depend on the timing of the servicer’s receipt of securitized utility tariff charges from customers. Changes in the expected weighted average lives of the tranches of the securitized utility tariff bonds in relation to variances in actual energy consumption levels (retail electric sales) from forecast levels are shown below.

 

       Weighted Average Life Sensitivity  
       -5%
( Standard Deviations from
Mean)
    

-15%

( Standard
Deviations from Mean)

 
Tranche    Expected Weighted
Average Life (Years)
     WAL (yrs)      Change (days)*      WAL (yrs)      Change (days)*  
              
              
              
              

 

*

Number is rounded to whole days

 

87


Table of Contents

Assumptions

For the purposes of preparing the above chart, the following assumptions, among others, have been made: (i) in relation to the initial forecast, the forecast error stays constant over the life of the securitized utility tariff bonds and is equal to an overestimate of electricity consumption of 5% (            standard deviations from mean) or 15% (            standard deviations from mean), (ii) the servicer makes timely and accurate submissions to true-up the securitized utility tariff charges annually, (iii) customer write-off rates are held constant at     % and     % for residential and non-residential, (iv) Evergy Missouri West remits all securitized utility tariff charges on average      days and      days after such charges are billed to residential and non-residential customers, respectively, (v) ongoing financing costs are equal to projections, (vi) there is no acceleration of the final maturity date of the securitized utility tariff bonds, (vii) a permanent loss of all customers has not occurred, and (viii) the issuance date of the securitized utility tariff bonds is             , 2023. There can be no assurance that the weighted average lives of the securitized utility tariff bonds will be as shown.

 

88


Table of Contents

THE SALE AGREEMENT

The following summary describes particular material terms and provisions of the sale agreement pursuant to which the issuing entity will purchase securitized utility tariff property from the seller. The depositor has filed the form of the sale agreement as an exhibit to the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part.

Sale and Assignment of the Securitized Utility Tariff Property

On the issuance date, pursuant to a sale agreement, the seller will sell, transfer and assign securitized utility tariff property to the issuing entity, without recourse, except as provided in such sale agreement. The securitized utility tariff property acquired on that date represents all irrevocable right, title and interest in and to non-bypassable rates and other charges established by the financing order to be collected from existing and future retail customers in Evergy Missouri West’s service territory in amounts sufficient to repay bond principal, interest and related financing costs and all rights to obtain adjustments to such securitized utility tariff charges in accordance with the Securitization Law and the financing order. The issuing entity will apply the net proceeds that the issuing entity receives from the sale of the securitized utility tariff bonds to the purchase of the securitized utility tariff property acquired on that date.

In accordance with the Securitization Law, the transfer by Evergy Missouri West to the issuing entity of securitized utility tariff property will be deemed perfected as against third persons upon the filing of a financing statement with the office of the secretary of state.

Conditions to the Sale of Securitized Utility Tariff Property

The issuing entity’s obligation to purchase and the seller’s obligation to sell securitized utility tariff property on the issuance date will be subject to the satisfaction of each of the following conditions:

 

   

on or prior to the issuance date, the seller must duly execute and deliver the sale agreement to the issuing entity;

 

   

on or prior to the issuance date, the seller must have received the financing order from the MPSC authorizing the creation of the securitized utility tariff property;

 

   

on or prior to the issuance date, the seller must have filed the issuance advice letter with the MPSC and such letter must be effective;

 

   

as of the issuance date, the seller may not be insolvent and may not be made insolvent by the sale of securitized utility tariff property to the issuing entity, and the seller may not be aware of any pending insolvency with respect to itself;

 

   

as of the issuance date, the representations and warranties of the seller in the sale agreement must be true and correct (except to the extent they relate to an earlier date), the seller may not have breached any of its covenants in the sale agreement, and the servicer may not be in default under the servicing agreement;

 

   

as of the issuance date, the issuing entity must have sufficient funds available to pay the purchase price for securitized utility tariff property to be conveyed and all conditions to the issuance of the securitized utility tariff bonds intended to provide the funds to purchase that securitized utility tariff property set forth in the indenture must have been satisfied or waived;

 

   

on or prior to the issuance date, the seller must have taken all action required to transfer ownership of securitized utility tariff property to be conveyed to the issuing entity on the issuance date, free and clear of all liens other than liens created by the issuing entity pursuant to the basic documents and to perfect such transfer including, without limitation, filing any statements or filings under the Securitization Law or the UCC; and the issuing entity or the servicer, on the issuing entity’s behalf, must have taken any action required for the issuing entity to grant the trustee a lien and first priority perfected security interest in the collateral and maintain that security interest as of the issuance date;

 

89


Table of Contents
   

the seller must receive and deliver to the issuing entity and the trustee an opinion or opinions of outside tax counsel (as selected by the seller, and in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the issuing entity and the underwriters),

 

   

to the effect that: (i) the issuing entity will not be subject to United States federal income tax as an entity separate from the issuing entity’s sole owner and that the securitized utility tariff bonds will be treated as debt of the issuing entity’s sole owner for U.S. federal income tax purposes and (ii) for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the issuance of the securitized utility tariff bonds will not result in gross income to the seller;

 

   

on and as of the issuance date, the issuing entity’s limited liability company agreement, the servicing agreement, the sale agreement, the indenture, the Securitization Law, the financing order and any tariff authorizing the collection of securitized utility tariff charges must be in full force and effect; and

 

   

the seller must deliver to the issuing entity and to the trustee an officers’ certificate confirming the satisfaction of each of these conditions.

Seller Representations and Warranties

In the sale agreement, the seller will represent and warrant to the issuing entity, as of the issuance date, to the effect, among other things, that:

 

   

no portion of the securitized utility tariff property has been sold, transferred, assigned or pledged or otherwise conveyed by the seller to any person other than the issuing entity and immediately prior to the sale of the securitized utility tariff property, the seller owns the securitized utility tariff property free and clear of all liens and rights of any other person, and no offsets, defenses or counterclaims exist or have been asserted with respect to the securitized utility tariff property;

 

   

on the issuance date, immediately upon the sale under the sale agreement, the securitized utility tariff property transferred on the issuance date will be validly transferred and sold to the issuing entity, the issuing entity will own the securitized utility tariff property free and clear of all liens (except for liens created in your favor by the Securitization Law and the basic documents) and all filings and action to be made or taken by the seller (including filings with the Secretary of State of Missouri under the Securitization Law) necessary in any jurisdiction to give the issuing entity a perfected ownership interest (subject to any lien created by the issuing entity or by the Securitization Law in your favor under the basic documents or the Securitization Law) in the securitized utility tariff property will have been made or taken;

 

   

subject to the clause below regarding assumptions used in calculating the securitized utility tariff charges as of the issuance date, all written information, as amended or supplemented from time to time, provided by the seller to the issuing entity with respect to the securitized utility tariff property (including the expected sinking fund schedule, the financing order and the issuance advice letter relating to the securitized utility tariff property) is true and correct in all material respects;

 

   

under the laws of the State of Missouri (including the Securitization Law) and the United States in effect on the issuance date:

 

   

the financing order and issuance advice letter pursuant to which the rights and interests of the seller in the securitized utility tariff property have been created, including the right to impose, collect and receive the securitized utility tariff charges and, the interest in and to the securitized utility tariff property, has become final and non-appealable and is in full force and effect, and the seller has validly and irrevocably consented to the terms of the financing order;

 

   

the securitized utility tariff bonds are entitled to the protection provided in specific sections of the Securitization Law, subject to the limitations specified therein (please read “The Securitized Utility Tariff Property and the Securitization Law” in this prospectus);

 

   

the process by which the financing order was approved and the financing order, issuance advice letter and tariff comply with all applicable laws and regulations;

 

90


Table of Contents
   

no other approval, authorization, consent, order or other action of, or filing with any governmental authority is required on the part of the seller in connection with the creation of the securitized utility tariff property, except those that have been obtained or made;

 

   

the issuance advice letter and the tariff have been filed in accordance with the financing order and an officer of the seller has provided the certification to the MPSC required by the issuance advice letter; and

 

   

the State of Missouri has pledged that it will not take any action that impairs the value of the securitized utility tariff property or the security for the securitized utility tariff bonds or, except as provided with respect to the true-up mechanism, reduce, alter or impair the securitized utility tariff charges until any and all principal, interest and financing costs have been paid and performed in full.

 

   

based on information available to the seller on the issuance date, the assumptions used in calculating the securitized utility tariff charges as of the issuance date are reasonable and are made in good faith; however, notwithstanding the foregoing, Evergy Missouri West makes no representation or warranty, express or implied, that amounts actually collected arising from those securitized utility tariff charges will in fact be sufficient to meet the payment obligations on the related securitized utility tariff bonds or that the assumptions used in calculating such securitized utility tariff charges will in fact be realized;

 

   

upon the effectiveness of the financing order, the issuance advice letter and the tariff with respect to the transferred securitized utility tariff property and the transfer of such securitized utility tariff property to us:

 

   

the right and interest of the seller under the financing order in and to the securitized utility tariff charges established by provisions of the Securitization Law and the financing order, including all rights to obtain true-up adjustments, become securitized utility tariff property;

 

   

the securitized utility tariff property constitutes an existing present intangible property right vested in us;

 

   

the securitized utility tariff property includes (i) the right and interest under the financing order, including the right to impose, bill charge, collect and receive securitized utility tariff charges, including the right to obtain adjustments of such charges as authorized in the financing order and (ii) all revenues, collections, claims, rights to payments, payments, money or proceeds of or arising from the rights and interests specified in the financing order;

 

   

the owner of the securitized utility tariff property is legally entitled to bill securitized utility tariff charges and collect payments in respect of the securitized utility tariff charges in the aggregate sufficient to pay the interest on and principal of the related securitized utility tariff bonds in accordance with the indenture, to pay the fees and expenses of servicing the securitized utility tariff bonds, and to replenish the capital subaccount to the required capital level until the securitized utility tariff bonds are paid in full; and

 

   

the securitized utility tariff property is not subject to any lien other than the lien created by the basic documents or pursuant to the Securitization Law;

 

   

the seller is a corporation duly organized and in good standing under the laws of the State of Delaware, with the requisite corporate power and authority to own its properties and conduct its business as currently owned or conducted;

 

   

the seller has the requisite corporate power and authority to obtain the financing order and to own the rights and interests under the financing order relating to the securitized utility tariff bonds, to sell and transfer those rights and interests to the issuing entity, whereupon (subject to the effectiveness of the related issuance advice letter) such rights and interests will become securitized utility tariff property;

 

   

the seller is duly qualified to do business in Missouri and is in good standing, and has obtained all necessary licenses and approvals, in all jurisdictions in which the ownership or lease of property or the conduct of its business shall require qualifications, licenses or approvals (except where the failure to so qualify or obtain such licenses and approvals would not be reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the seller’s business, operations, assets, revenues or properties).

 

91


Table of Contents
   

the seller has the requisite corporate power and authority to execute and deliver the sale agreement and to carry out its terms, and the execution, delivery and performance of the sale agreement have been duly authorized by the seller by all necessary corporate action;

 

   

the sale agreement constitutes a legal, valid and binding obligation of the seller, enforceable against it in accordance with its terms, subject to customary exceptions relating to bankruptcy, creditor’s rights and equitable principles;

 

   

the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the sale agreement and the fulfillment of its terms do not (a) conflict with the seller’s organizational documents or any indenture or other agreement or instrument to which the seller is a party or by which it or any of its property is bound, (b) result in the creation or imposition of any lien upon the seller’s properties pursuant to the terms of any such indenture, agreement or other instrument (other than any liens that may be granted in favor of the trustee for the benefit of the bondholders or any liens created by the issuing entity pursuant to the Securitization Law and the financing order or the basic documents), (c) violate any existing law or any existing order, rule or regulation applicable to the seller and (d) is consistent with the Securitization Law and the financing order;

 

   

no proceeding is pending and, to the seller’s knowledge, no proceeding is threatened and, to the seller’s knowledge, no investigation is pending or threatened before any governmental authority having jurisdiction over the seller or its properties involving or relating to the seller or to the issuing entity or, to the seller’s knowledge, any other person:

 

   

asserting the invalidity of the Securitization Law, the financing order, the issuance advice letter, the sale agreement, the securitized utility tariff bonds and the basic documents;

 

   

seeking to prevent the issuance of the securitized utility tariff bonds or the consummation of any of the transactions contemplated by the sale agreement or any of the other basic documents;

 

   

seeking any determination that could reasonably be expected to materially and adversely affect the performance by the seller of its obligations under, or the validity or enforceability of, the Securitization Law, the financing order, the securitized utility tariff bonds, the issuance advice letter, the sale agreement or the other basic documents; or

 

   

seeking to adversely affect the federal income tax or state income or franchise tax classification of the securitized utility tariff bonds as debt;

 

   

except for financing statements under the Securitization Law, no governmental approvals, authorizations, consents, orders or other actions or filings with any governmental authority are required for the seller to execute, deliver and perform its obligations under the sale agreement except those which have previously been obtained or made or are required to be made by the servicer in the future pursuant to the servicing agreement;

 

   

the information describing the seller under the caption “The Depositor, Seller, Initial Servicer and Sponsor” in this prospectus is true and correct in all material respects;

 

   

there is no order by any court providing for the revocation, alteration, limitation or other impairment of the Securitization Law, the financing order, the issuance advice letter, the securitized utility tariff property or the securitized utility tariff charges or any rights arising under any of them or that seeks to enjoin the performance of any obligations under the financing order; and

 

   

after giving effect to the sale of the securitized utility tariff property under the sale agreement, Evergy Missouri West:

 

   

is solvent and expects to remain solvent;

 

   

is adequately capitalized to conduct its business and affairs considering its size and the nature of its business and intended purposes;

 

92


Table of Contents
   

is not engaged and does not expect to engage in a business for which its remaining property represents an unreasonably small portion of its capital;

 

   

reasonably believes that it will be able to pay its debts as they become due; and

 

   

is able to pay its debts as they mature and does not intend to incur, or believes that it will not incur, indebtedness that it will not be able to repay at its maturity.

The seller will not make any representation or warranty, express or implied, that billed securitized utility tariff charges will be actually collected from customers.

Certain of the representations and warranties that the seller makes in the sale agreement involve conclusions of law. The seller makes those representations and warranties in order to reflect the understanding of the basis on which the issuing entity is issuing the securitized utility tariff bonds and to reflect the agreement that if this understanding proves to be incorrect, the seller will be obligated to indemnify the issuing entity.

The representations and warranties made by the seller will survive the execution and delivery of the sale agreement, and the issuing entity’s pledge of the securitized utility tariff property to the trustee. The seller will not be in breach of any representation or warranty as a result of any change in law occurring after the issuance date including by means of any legislative enactment, constitutional amendment or voter initiative that renders any of the representations or warranties untrue.

Covenants of the Seller

In the sale agreement, the seller makes the following covenants:

 

   

Subject to its right to assign its rights and obligations to a successor utility under the sale agreement, so long as any of the securitized utility tariff bonds are outstanding, the seller will (a) keep in full force and effect its existence and remain in good standing under the laws of the jurisdiction of its organization, (b) obtain and preserve its qualifications to do business in those jurisdictions necessary to protect the validity and enforceability of the sale agreement and the other basic documents or to the extent necessary to perform its obligations under the sale agreement and the other basic documents and (c) continue to operate its distribution system to provide service to its customers.

 

   

Except for the conveyances under the sale agreement or any lien under the Securitization Law for the benefit of the issuing entity, the bondholders or the trustee, the seller will not sell, pledge, assign or transfer, or grant, create, incur, assume or suffer to exist any lien on, any of the securitized utility tariff property, or any interest therein, and the seller will defend the right, title and interest of the issuing entity and of the trustee on behalf of the bondholders, in, to and under the securitized utility tariff property against all claims of third parties claiming through or under the seller. The seller also covenants that, in its capacity as seller, it will not at any time assert any lien against, or with respect to, any of the securitized utility tariff property.

 

   

If the seller receives any payments in respect of the securitized utility tariff charges or the proceeds thereof other than in its capacity as the servicer, the seller agrees to pay all those payments to the servicer, on behalf of the issuing entity, and to hold such amounts in trust for the issuing entity and the trustee prior to such payment.

 

   

The seller shall not continue as or become a party to any future trade receivables purchase and sale agreement or similar arrangement under which it sells all or any portion of its accounts receivables owing from customers who are obligated to pay the securitized utility tariff charge, unless the trustee, the seller and the other parties to such additional arrangement shall have entered into a joinder to its existing intercreditor agreement in connection therewith and the terms of the documentation evidencing such new or amended trade receivables purchase and sale arrangement or similar arrangement shall expressly exclude securitized utility tariff property (including securitized utility tariff charges) from any receivables or other assets pledged or sold under such arrangement.

 

93


Table of Contents
   

If the seller enters into a sale agreement selling to any other affiliate securitized utility tariff property or similar property, consisting of non-bypassable charges payable by customers comparable to those sold by the seller pursuant to the sale agreement, the rating agency condition must be satisfied with respect to the securitized utility tariff bonds prior to or coincident with such sale and the seller will enter into a joinder agreement to the intercreditor agreement with the issuing entity, the trustee for the securitized utility tariff bonds, the issuing entity of any such additional securitized utility tariff bonds and the trustee for such additional securitized utility tariff bonds described in “Security for the Securitized Utility Tariff Bonds—Intercreditor Agreement”.

 

   

The seller will notify the issuing entity and the trustee promptly after becoming aware of any lien on any of the securitized utility tariff property, other than the conveyances under the sale agreement, or any lien under the basic documents or under the Securitization Law or the UCC in favor of the trustee for the benefit of the bondholders.

 

   

The seller agrees to comply with its organizational or governing documents and all laws, treaties, rules, regulations and determinations of any governmental authority applicable to it, except to the extent that failure to so comply would not materially adversely affect the issuing entity’s or the trustee’s interests in the securitized utility tariff property or under the basic documents to which the seller is a party or the seller’s performance of its obligations under the basic documents to which the seller is a party.

 

   

So long as any of the securitized utility tariff bonds are outstanding, the seller will:

 

   

treat the securitized utility tariff property as the issuing entity’s property for all purposes other than for financial reporting, state or federal regulatory or tax purposes;

 

   

treat the securitized utility tariff bonds as debt of the issuing entity, other than for financial reporting, state or federal regulatory or tax purposes;

 

   

treat the securitized utility tariff bonds as indebtedness of the seller secured by the securitized utility tariff bond collateral solely for the purposes of federal taxes;

 

   

disclose in its financial statements that the issuing entity and not the seller are the owner of the securitized utility tariff property and that the issuing entity’s assets are not available to pay creditors of the seller or its affiliates (other than us);

 

   

not own or purchase any securitized utility tariff bonds; and

 

   

disclose the effects of all transactions between the issuing entity and the seller in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

 

   

The seller agrees that, upon the sale by the seller of securitized utility tariff property to the issuing entity pursuant to the sale agreement, to the fullest extent permitted by law, the issuing entity will have all of the rights originally held by the seller with respect to the securitized utility tariff property, including the right to exercise any and all rights and remedies to collect any amounts payable by any customer in respect of the transferred securitized utility tariff property, notwithstanding any objection or direction to the contrary by the seller, and any payment by any customer to the issuing entity will discharge that customer’s obligations in respect of that securitized utility tariff property to the extent of that payment, notwithstanding any objection or direction to the contrary by the seller;

 

   

So long as any of the securitized utility tariff bonds are outstanding:

 

   

In all proceedings relating directly or indirectly to the securitized utility tariff property, the seller will affirmatively certify and confirm that it has sold all of its rights and interests in and to such property (other than for financial reporting or tax purposes), and will not make any statement or reference in respect of the securitized utility tariff property that is inconsistent with the issuing entity’s ownership interest (other than for financial accounting, state or regulatory or tax purposes).

 

   

The seller will not take any action in respect of the securitized utility tariff property except solely in its capacity as servicer pursuant to the servicing agreement or as otherwise contemplated by the basic documents.

 

94


Table of Contents
   

Neither the seller nor the issuing entity will file any tax return, or make any election inconsistent with the treatment of the issuing entity, for federal income tax purposes and, to the extent consistent with applicable state tax law, state income and franchise tax purposes, as a disregarded entity that is not separate from the seller (or, if relevant, from another sole owner of the issuing entity, as the issuing entity).

 

   

The seller will execute and file the filings required by law to fully preserve, maintain, protect and perfect the issuing entity’s ownership interest in and the trustee’s lien on the securitized utility tariff property, including all filings required under the Securitization Law and the UCC relating to the transfer of the ownership of the rights and interests related to the securitized utility tariff bonds under the financing order by the seller to the issuing entity and the pledge of the securitized utility tariff property to the trustee. The seller will institute any action or proceeding necessary to compel performance by the MPSC, the State of Missouri or any of their respective agents of any of their obligations or duties under the Securitization Law, the financing order or any issuance advice letter. The seller also will take those legal or administrative actions, including defending against or instituting and pursuing legal actions and appearing or testifying at hearings or similar proceedings, in each case, as may be reasonably necessary (i) to protect the issuing entity, the bondholders and the trustee from claims, state actions or other actions or proceedings of third parties which, if successfully pursued, would result in a breach of any representation or warranty of the seller in the sale agreement and (ii) to block or overturn any attempts to cause a repeal of, modification of or supplement to the Securitization Law, the financing order, any issuance advice letter or the rights of holders by legislative enactment or constitutional amendment that would be materially adverse to the issuing entity, the trustee or the bondholder or which would otherwise cause an impairment of the issuing entity’s rights or those of the bondholders and the trustee, and the seller will pay the costs of any such actions or proceedings.

 

   

Even if the sale agreement or the indenture is terminated, the seller will not, prior to the date which is one year and one day after the termination of the indenture and payment in full of the securitized utility tariff bonds or any other amounts owed under the indenture, petition or otherwise invoke or cause the issuing entity to invoke the process of any court or government authority for the purpose of commencing or sustaining a case against the issuing entity under any federal or state bankruptcy, insolvency or similar law, appointing a receiver, liquidator, assignee, trustee, custodian, sequestrator or other similar official or any substantial part of the issuing entity’s property, or ordering the winding up or liquidation of the issuing entity’s affairs.

 

   

So long as any of the securitized utility tariff bonds are outstanding, the seller will, and will cause each of its subsidiaries to, pay all material taxes, assessments and governmental charges imposed upon it or any of its properties or assets or with respect to any of its franchises, business, income or property before any penalty accrues if the failure to pay any such taxes, assessments and governmental charges would, after any applicable grace periods, notices or other similar requirements, result in a lien on the transferred securitized utility tariff property; provided, that no such tax need be paid if the seller or any of its affiliates is contesting the same in good faith by appropriate proceedings promptly instituted and diligently conducted and if the seller or such affiliate has established appropriate reserves as shall be required in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

 

   

The seller will not withdraw the submission of any issuance advice letter with the MPSC.

 

   

The seller will make all reasonable efforts to keep each tariff in full force and effect at all times.

 

   

Promptly after obtaining knowledge of any breach in any material respect of its representations and warranties in the sale agreement, the seller will notify the issuing entity, the MPSC and the rating agencies of the breach.

 

   

The seller will use the proceeds of the sale of the securitized utility tariff property in accordance with the financing order and the Securitization Law.

 

   

Upon the issuing entity’s request, the seller will execute and deliver such further instruments and do such further acts as may be necessary to carry out the provisions and purposes of the sale agreement.

 

95


Table of Contents

Indemnification

The seller will indemnify, defend and hold harmless the issuing entity, the trustee (for itself and for the benefit of the bondholders) and any of the issuing entity’s and the trustee’s officers, directors, employees and agents against:

 

   

any and all amounts of principal and interest on the securitized utility tariff bonds not paid when due or when scheduled to be paid in accordance with their terms;

 

   

any other amounts payable to any person in connection with the securitized utility tariff bonds or in connection with the securitized utility tariff property, including but not limited to trustee’s fees and expenses, that are not paid when due or when scheduled to be paid pursuant to the applicable indenture;

 

   

the amount of any other deposits to the collection account required to have been made in accordance with the terms of the basic documents and retained in the capital subaccount, in the excess funds subaccount or released to the issuing entity free of the lien of the applicable indenture, which are not made when so required;

 

   

any taxes payable by bondholders resulting in a breach of a specific tax representation of the seller; and

 

   

any reasonable costs and expenses incurred by such person that are not recoverable pursuant to the applicable indenture,

in each case to the extent resulting from the seller’s breach of any of its representations, warranties or covenants contained in the sale agreement, except to the extent of losses either resulting from the willful misconduct, bad faith or gross negligence of such indemnified persons or resulting from a breach of representation or warranty in any of the basic documents of the party seeking indemnification.

The seller’s indemnification obligations survive the resignation or removal of the trustee and the termination of the sale agreement. The seller will be liable in accordance with the sale agreement only to the extent of the obligations specifically undertaken by the seller in the sale agreement.

Successors to the Seller

Any person (a) into which the seller may be merged, converted or consolidated and that succeeds to all or substantially all of the electric distribution business of the seller, (b) that results from the division of the seller into two or more persons and that succeeds to all or substantially all of the electric distribution business of the seller, (c) that results from any merger or consolidation to which the seller shall be a party and that succeeds to all or substantially all of the electric distribution business of the seller, (d) that succeeds to the properties and assets of the seller substantially as a whole, or succeeds to all or substantially all of the electric distribution business of the seller, or (e) that otherwise succeeds to all or substantially all of the electric distribution business of the seller, shall be the successor to the seller under the sale agreement without further act on the part of any of the parties to the sale agreement; provided, that the following conditions are met:

 

   

immediately after giving effect to any transaction referred to in this paragraph, no representation or warranty made in the sale agreement will have been breached, and no servicer default, and no event that, after notice or lapse of time, or both, would become a servicer default will have occurred and be continuing;

 

   

the successor must execute an agreement of assumption to perform every obligation of the seller under the sale agreement;

 

   

officers’ certificates and opinions of counsel specified in the sale agreement will have been delivered to the issuing entity and the trustee; and

 

   

the rating agencies will have received prior written notice of the transaction.

 

96


Table of Contents

Amendment

The sale agreement may be amended in writing by the seller and the issuing entity, if a copy of the amendment is provided by the issuing entity to each rating agency and the rating agency condition is satisfied, with the consent of the trustee. If any such amendment would adversely affect the interest of any bondholder in any material respect, the consent of the holders of a majority of each affected tranche of securitized utility tariff bonds is also required. In determining whether a majority of holders have consented, securitized utility tariff bonds owned by the issuing entity, Evergy Missouri West or any affiliate of the issuing entity shall be disregarded, except that, in determining whether the trustee shall be protected in relying upon any such consent, the trustee shall only be required to disregard any securitized utility tariff bonds it actually knows to be so owned.

In addition, the sale agreement may be amended in writing by the seller and the issuing entity with ten business days’ prior written notice given to the rating agencies, but without the consent of any of the bondholders, (i) to cure any ambiguity, to correct or supplement any provisions in the sale agreement or for the purpose of adding any provisions to or changing in any manner or eliminating any of the provisions in the sale agreement or of modifying in any manner the rights of the bondholders; provided, however, that such action shall not, as evidenced by an officer’s certificate delivered to the issuing entity and the trustee, adversely affect in any material respect the interests of any bondholder or (ii) to conform the provisions of the sale agreement to the description of the sale agreement in this prospectus. Promptly after the execution of any such amendment or consent, the issuing entity will furnish copies of such amendment or consent to each of the rating agencies.

 

97


Table of Contents

THE SERVICING AGREEMENT

The following summary describes the material terms and provisions of the servicing agreement pursuant to which the servicer is undertaking to service the securitized utility tariff property. The depositor has filed the form of the servicing agreement as an exhibit to the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part.

Servicing Procedures

The servicer will manage, service and administer, bill, collect and post all payments in respect of, the securitized utility tariff property according to the terms of the servicing agreement. The servicer’s duties will include:

 

   

calculating consumption, billing the securitized utility tariff charges, collecting the securitized utility tariff charges from customers and posting all collections;

 

   

responding to inquiries of customers, the MPSC or any other governmental authority regarding the securitized utility tariff property or securitized utility tariff charges;

 

   

investigating and handling delinquencies (and furnishing reports with respect to such delinquencies to the issuing entity);

 

   

processing and depositing collections and making periodic remittances;

 

   

furnishing periodic and current reports and statements to the issuing entity, the MPSC, the rating agencies and the trustee;

 

   

making all filings with the MPSC and taking all other actions necessary to perfect the issuing entity’s ownership interests in and the trustee’s lien on the securitized utility tariff property;

 

   

making all filings and taking such other action as may be necessary to perfect the trustee’s lien on and security interest in all collateral;

 

   

selling, as the issuing entity’s agent, as the issuing entity’s interests may appear, defaulted or written off accounts;

 

   

taking all necessary action in connection with true-up adjustments; and

 

   

performing other duties specified under the financing order.

The servicer will be required to notify the issuing entity, the trustee and the rating agencies in writing if it becomes aware of any laws or commission regulations promulgated after the execution of the servicing agreement that have a material adverse effect on the servicer’s ability to perform its duties under the servicing agreement. The servicer is also authorized to execute and deliver documents and to make filings and participate in proceedings on the issuing entity’s behalf.

In addition, upon the issuing entity’s reasonable request or the reasonable request of the trustee or any rating agency, the servicer will provide to the issuing entity, the trustee or any rating agency public financial information about the servicer and any material information about the securitized utility tariff property that is reasonably available, as may be reasonably necessary and permitted by law to enable the issuing entity, the trustee or any rating agency to monitor the servicer’s performance; provided, however, that any such request by the trustee shall not create any obligation for the trustee to monitor the performance of the servicer. In addition, so long as any securitized utility tariff bonds are outstanding, the servicer will provide within a reasonable time after written request thereof, any information available to the servicer or reasonably obtainable by it that is necessary to calculate the securitized utility tariff charges. The servicer will also prepare any reports required to be filed by the issuing entity with the SEC, as further described below, and will cause to be delivered required opinions of counsel to the effect that all filings with the State of Missouri necessary to preserve and protect the interests of the trustee in the securitized utility tariff property have been made.

 

98


Table of Contents

Servicing Standards and Covenants

The servicing agreement will require the servicer to (i) manage, service, administer, bill, collect and calculate securitized utility tariff charges in accordance with the Securitization Law and post collections in respect of the securitized utility tariff property with reasonable care and in material compliance with applicable requirements of law, including all applicable regulations of the MPSC and guidelines, using the same degree of care and diligence that the servicer exercises with respect to similar assets for its own account, (ii) follow customary standards, policies and procedures for the industry in Missouri in performing its duties as servicer, (iii) use all reasonable efforts, consistent with its customary servicing procedures, to enforce, and maintain rights in respect of, the securitized utility tariff property and to bill and collect the securitized utility tariff charges, (iv) comply with all requirements of law, including all applicable regulations and guidelines of the MPSC applicable to and binding on it relating to the securitized utility tariff property, (v) file all MPSC notices described in the Securitization Law and file and maintain the effectiveness of UCC financing statements with respect to the property transferred to the issuing entity under the sale agreement and (vi) take such other action on the issuing entity’s behalf to ensure that the lien of the trustee on the collateral remains perfected and of first priority. The servicer shall follow customary and usual practices and procedures as it deems necessary or advisable in servicing the securitized utility tariff property, which, in the servicer’s judgment, may include taking legal action at the issuing entity’s expense but subject to the priority of payments set forth in the indenture or in the series supplement.

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the servicing agreement, the duties of the servicer set forth in the servicing agreement shall be qualified and limited in their entirety by the Securitization Law, the financing order, any MPSC regulation and U.S. federal securities laws and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder as in effect at the time such duties are to be performed.

The servicing agreement will also require the servicer to provide various reports regarding the securitized utility tariff charges and allocation of the securitized utility tariff charges among various classes of customers and payments to the bondholders, in each case as are necessary to effect collection, allocation and remittance of payments in respect of securitized utility tariff charges and other collected funds as required under the basic documents.

The servicer will be responsible for instituting any action or proceeding to compel performance by the State of Missouri or the MPSC of their respective obligations under the Securitization Law, the financing order and any true-up adjustment. The servicer will take such legal or administrative actions, including defending against or instituting and pursuing legal actions and appearing or testifying at hearings or similar proceedings, as may be reasonably necessary to attempt to block or overturn any attempts to cause a repeal of, modification of or supplement to the Securitization Law, the financing order or the rights of holders of securitized utility tariff property by legislative enactment, constitutional amendment or other means that would be adverse to bondholders. Any costs associated with such legal or administrative action will be borne by the issuing entity as an operating expense; provided, however, that the servicer will be obligated to institute and maintain such action or proceedings only if it is being reimbursed on a current basis for its costs and expenses in taking such actions in accordance with the related indenture or series supplement, and is not required to advance its own funds to satisfy these obligations.

True-Up Adjustment Submissions

The servicing agreement requires the servicer to submit true-up adjustment filings to secure annual and interim true-up adjustments to the securitized utility tariff charges. The servicing agreement also requires the servicer to submit interim true-up adjustment filings semi-annually if the servicer forecasts that projected securitized utility tariff charge collections will be insufficient to pay principal of and interest on the securitized utility tariff bonds and other related financing costs to otherwise satisfy the current or next succeeding payment period requirement or to replenish any draws upon the capital subaccount. The true-up is designed to (a) correct any under collections or overcollections that may have occurred and otherwise ensure that the SPE receives remittances from securitized utility tariff charges that are required to satisfy the total securitized revenue requirement, including without limitation any overcollections or under collections caused by defaults, during the time since the last true-up; and (b) ensure the billing of securitized utility tariff charges necessary to generate the collection of amounts sufficient to timely provide all payments of scheduled principal and interest (or deposits to sinking funds in respect of principal and interest) and any other amounts due in connection with the securitized utility tariff bonds (including ongoing financing costs and amounts required to be deposited in or allocated to any collection account or subaccount) during the period for which such adjusted securitized utility tariff charges are to be in effect.

 

99


Table of Contents

Each true-up adjustment will allocate the revenue requirement among the customer classes in accordance with the methodology used to determine the securitized utility tariff charges approved in the financing order, including as the methodology as the same may be modified by a non-routine true-up adjustment submission described in the prior paragraphs. Please read “Evergy Missouri West’s Financing Order—Securitized Utility Tariff Charges—The Financing Order Approves the Methodology used to Calculate the Securitized Utility Tariff Charges” in this prospectus.

Remittances to Collection Account

The servicer will remit estimated securitized utility tariff charge collections to the trustee for deposit in the collection account within two business days after such amounts are deemed to have been received. The servicer will remit estimated securitized utility tariff charge collections based on actual securitized utility tariff charge billings each day and its then-current Weighted Average Days Sales Outstanding and an estimated system-wide write-off percentage. No less often than semi-annually, the servicer will reconcile remittances of estimated securitized utility tariff charge collections with actual securitized utility tariff charge collections received by the servicer, based on Weighted Average Days Sales Outstanding and the actual system-wide write-off percentage. The system-wide write-off percentage will include an adjustment, as appropriate for the collection of any shortfalls in customer payments first allocated ratably among the securitized utility tariff charges and other fees (excluding any late fees), and second, any remaining portion of the payment must be allocated to late fees.

To the extent the remittances of estimated securitized utility tariff charge collections exceed the amounts that should have been remitted based on actual system-wide write-offs, the servicer will be entitled to withhold the excess amount from any subsequent remittance to the trustee. To the extent the remittances of estimated securitized utility tariff charge collections are less than the amount that should have been remitted based on actual system-wide write-offs, the servicer will remit the amount of the shortfall to the trustee within two business days. Although the servicer will remit estimated securitized utility tariff charge collections to the trustee, the servicer is not obligated to make any payments on the securitized utility tariff bonds.

The servicing agreement and the financing order require that, in the event a customer does not pay in full all amounts owed under any bill, including securitized utility tariff charges, any resulting shortfalls in securitized utility tariff charges will first be allocated ratably among the securitized utility tariff charges and other fees (excluding any late fees), and second, any remaining portion of the payment must be allocated to late fees.

The servicer has agreed and acknowledged that it holds all securitized utility tariff charge collections received by it and any other proceeds for the securitized utility tariff bond collateral received by it for the benefit of the trustee and the bondholders and that all such amounts will be remitted by the servicer without any surcharge, fee, offset, charge or other deduction. The servicer has further agreed not to make any claim to reduce its obligation to remit all securitized utility tariff charge payments collected by it in accordance with this servicing agreement.

Servicing Compensation

The servicer will be entitled to receive an annual servicing fee in an amount equal to:

 

   

$         per annum (0.05% of the initial aggregate principal amount of the securitized utility tariff bonds) for so long as the servicer remains Evergy Missouri West or an affiliate, plus out of pocket expenses; or

 

   

if Evergy Missouri West or any of its affiliates is not the servicer, an amount not to exceed 0.60% of the original principal amount of the securitized utility tariff bonds unless such higher rate is approved by the MPSC and the indenture trustee and subject to the rating agency condition.

The servicing fee shall be paid semi-annually, with half of the servicing fee being paid on each payment date, except for the amount of the servicing fee to be paid on the first payment date in which the servicing fee then due will be calculated based on the number of days the servicing agreement has been in effect. The trustee will pay the servicing fee on each payment date (together with any portion of the servicing fee that remains unpaid from prior payment dates) to the extent of available funds prior to the distribution of any interest on and principal of the securitized utility tariff bonds.

 

100


Table of Contents

Servicer Representations and Warranties; Indemnification

In the servicing agreement, the servicer will represent and warrant to the issuing entity, as of the issuance date of the securitized utility tariff bonds, among other things, that:

 

   

the servicer is duly organized, validly existing and is in good standing under the laws of the state of its organization (which is Delaware, when Evergy Missouri West is the servicer), with requisite corporate or other power and authority to own its properties, to conduct its business as such properties are currently owned and such business is presently conducted by it, and to service the securitized utility tariff property and hold the records related to the securitized utility tariff property, and to execute, deliver and carry out the terms of the servicing agreement, and had at all relevant times, and has, the requisite power, authority and legal right to service the securitized utility tariff property and to hold the securitized utility tariff property records as custodian;

 

   

the servicer is duly qualified to do business, is in good standing and has obtained all necessary licenses and approvals in all jurisdictions in which the ownership or lease of property or the conduct of its business (including the servicing of the securitized utility tariff property as required under the servicing agreement) requires such qualifications, licenses or approvals (except where a failure to qualify would not be reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the servicer’s business, operations, assets, revenues or properties or to its servicing of the securitized utility tariff property);

 

   

the execution, delivery and performance of the terms of the servicing agreement have been duly authorized by all necessary action on the part of the servicer under its organizational or governing documents and laws;

 

   

the servicing agreement constitutes a legal, valid and binding obligation of the servicer, enforceable against it in accordance with its terms, subject to applicable insolvency, reorganization, moratorium, fraudulent transfer and other laws relating to or affecting creditors’ rights generally from time to time in effect and to general principles of equity, regardless of whether considered in a proceeding in equity or at law (including concepts of materiality, reasonableness, good faith and fair dealing);

 

   

the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the servicing agreement do not conflict with, result in any breach of, nor constitute a material default under the servicer’s organizational documents or any indenture or material agreement or other instrument to which the servicer is a party or by which it or any of its property is bound, result in the creation or imposition of any lien upon the servicer’s properties pursuant to the terms of any such indenture or agreement or other instrument (other than any lien that may be granted in favor of the trustee for the benefit of bondholders under the basic documents or any lien created pursuant to the Securitization Law) or violate any existing law or any existing order, rule or regulation applicable to the servicer of any governmental authority having jurisdiction over the servicer or its properties;

 

   

each report or certificate delivered in connection with the issuance advice letter or delivered in connection with any submission made to the MPSC by the issuing entity with respect to the securitized utility tariff charges or true-up adjustments will be true and correct in all material respects, or, if based in part on or containing assumptions, forecasts or other predictions of future events, such assumptions, forecasts or predictions are reasonable based on historical performance (and facts known to the servicer on the date such report or certificate is delivered);

 

   

no approval, authorization, consent, order or other action of, or filing with any court, federal or state regulatory body, administrative agency or other governmental instrumentality is required in connection with the execution and delivery by the servicer of the servicing agreement, the performance by the servicer of the transactions contemplated by the servicing agreement or the fulfillment by the servicer of the terms of the servicing agreement, except those that have been obtained or made and those that the servicer is required to make in the future pursuant to the servicing agreement; and

 

101


Table of Contents
   

no proceeding or, to the servicer’s knowledge, investigation is pending and, to the servicer’s knowledge, no proceeding or investigation is threatened before any governmental authority having jurisdiction over the servicer or its properties involving or relating to the servicer or the issuing entity or, to the servicer’s knowledge, any other person, asserting the invalidity of the servicing agreement or the other basic documents, seeking to prevent issuance of the securitized utility tariff bonds or the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the servicing agreement or other basic documents, seeking a determination that could reasonably be expected to materially and adversely affect the performance by the servicer of its obligations under or the validity or enforceability of, the servicing agreement, the other basic documents or the securitized utility tariff bonds or seeking to adversely affect the federal income tax or state income or franchise tax classification of securitized utility tariff bonds as debt.

The Servicer Will Indemnify the Issuing Entity and Other Entities in Limited Circumstances

Under the servicing agreement, the servicer will agree to indemnify the issuing entity, the trustee, for itself and on behalf of those holders, the independent manager and any of the issuing entity’s and the trustee’s respective trustees, officers, directors, employees and agents against any losses that may be imposed upon, incurred by or asserted against any of those persons as a result of:

 

   

the servicer’s willful misconduct, bad faith or gross negligence in the performance of its duties or observance of its covenants under the applicable servicing agreement or the servicer’s reckless disregard of its obligations and duties under the applicable servicing agreement; or

 

   

the servicer’s material breach of any of its representations and warranties that results in a servicer default under the applicable servicing agreement.

The servicer will not be liable, however, for any losses resulting from the willful misconduct, bad faith or negligence or breach of a representation or warranty in any of the basic documents of the party seeking indemnification.

Furthermore, the servicer is not responsible for any action, decision, ruling, action or delay of the MPSC, other than any delay resulting from the servicer’s failure to submit required advice letters in a timely and correct manner or other breach of its duties under the servicing agreement. The servicer also is not liable for the calculation of the securitized utility tariff charges and true-up adjustments, including any inaccuracy in the assumptions made in the calculation, so long as the servicer has acted in good faith and has not acted in a grossly negligent manner.

Notwithstanding the servicer’s election to assume the defense of any action, proceeding or investigation, the issuing entity shall have the right to employ separate counsel (including local counsel), and the servicer shall bear the reasonable fees, costs and expenses of such separate counsel if (i) the defendants in any such action include both the issuing entity and the servicer and the issuing entity shall have reasonably concluded that there may be legal defenses available to it that are different from or additional to those available to the servicer, (ii) the servicer shall not have employed counsel reasonably satisfactory to the issuing entity to represent the issuing entity within a reasonable time after notice of the institution of such action, (iii) the servicer shall authorize the issuing entity to employ separate counsel at the expense of the servicer or (iv) in the case of the trustee, such action exposes the trustee to a material risk of criminal liability or forfeiture or a servicer default has occurred and is continuing. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the servicer shall not be obligated to pay for the fees, costs and expenses of more than one separate counsel for the issuing entity other than one local counsel, if appropriate. The servicer will not, without the prior written consent of the issuing entity, settle or compromise or consent to the entry of any judgment with respect to any pending or threatened claim, action, suit or proceeding in respect of which indemnification may be sought (whether or not the issuing entity is an actual or potential party to such claim or action) unless such settlement, compromise or consent includes an unconditional release of the issuing entity from all liability arising out of such claim, action, suit or proceeding.

Evidence as to Compliance

The servicing agreement will provide that the servicer will furnish annually to the issuing entity, the trustee and the rating agencies, on or before March 31 of each year, beginning March 31, 2024 or, if earlier, on the date on which the annual report relating to the securitized utility tariff bonds is required to be filed with the SEC, a report on its assessment of compliance with specified servicing criteria as required by Item 1122(a) of Regulation AB, during the preceding 12 months ended December 31 (or preceding period since the issuance date of the securitized utility tariff bonds in the case of the first statement), together with a certificate by an officer of the servicer certifying the statements set forth therein.

 

102


Table of Contents

The servicing agreement also provides that a firm of independent certified public accountants, at the servicer’s expense, will furnish annually to the issuing entity, the trustee and the rating agencies on or before March 31 of each year, beginning March 31, 2024 or, if earlier, on the date on which the annual report relating to the securitized utility tariff bonds is required to be filed with the SEC, an annual accountant’s report, which will include any required attestation report that attests to and reports on the servicer’s assessment report described in the immediately preceding paragraph, to the effect that the accounting firm has performed agreed upon procedures in connection with the servicer’s compliance with its obligations under the servicing agreement during the preceding 12 months, identifying the results of the procedures and including any exceptions noted.

Copies of the above reports will be filed with the SEC. You may also obtain copies of the above statements and certificates by sending a written request addressed to the trustee.

The servicer will also be required to deliver to the issuing entity, the trustee and the rating agencies monthly reports setting forth certain information relating to collections of securitized utility tariff charges received during the preceding calendar month and, shortly before each payment date, a semi-annual report setting forth the amount of principal and interest payable to bondholders on such date, the difference between the principal outstanding on the securitized utility tariff bonds and the amounts specified in the related expected sinking fund schedule after giving effect to any such payments, and the amounts on deposit in the capital subaccount and excess funds subaccount after giving effect to all transfers and payments to be made on such payment date. The servicer is required to file copies of the semi-annual payment date reports with the SEC.

In addition, the servicer is required to send copies of each submission or notice evidencing a true-up adjustment to the issuing entity, the trustee and the rating agencies. While there are no ESPs currently in Missouri, to the extent ESPs operate in Missouri in the future, the servicer shall be required to prepare and deliver certain disclosures to its customers and to ESPs, and to provide to the rating agencies any non-confidential and non-proprietary information about the ESPs as is reasonably requested by the rating agencies.

Matters Regarding the Servicer

The servicing agreement provides that Evergy Missouri West may not resign from its obligations and duties as servicer thereunder, except if (a) Evergy Missouri West determines that the performance of its duties under the servicing agreement is no longer permissible under applicable law or (b) satisfaction of the following: (i) the rating agency condition shall have been satisfied and (ii) the MPSC shall have approved such resignation. No resignation by Evergy Missouri West as servicer will become effective until a successor servicer has assumed Evergy Missouri West’s servicing obligations and duties under the servicing agreement.

The servicing agreement further provides that neither the servicer nor any of its directors, officers, employees, and agents will be liable to the issuing entity or to the trustee, the issuing entity’s managers, you or any other person or entity, except as provided under the servicing agreement, for taking any action or for refraining from taking any action under the servicing agreement or for good faith errors in judgment. However, neither the servicer nor any person or entity will be protected against any liability that would otherwise be imposed by reason of willful misconduct, bad faith or gross negligence in the performance of its duties. The servicer and any of director, officer, employee or agent of the servicer may rely in good faith on the advice of counsel or on any document of any kind, prima facie property executed and submitted by any person respecting any matters under the servicing agreement. In addition, the servicing agreement will provide that the servicer is under no obligation to appear in, prosecute, or defend any legal action, except as provided in the servicing agreement at the issuing entity’s expense.

Any person (a) into which the servicer may be merged or consolidated and that succeeds to all or substantially all of the electric distribution business of the servicer, (b) that results from the division of the servicer into two or more entities and succeeds to all or substantially all of the electric distribution business of the servicer, (c) that may result from any merger or consolidation to which the servicer shall be a party and succeeds to all or substantially all of the electric distribution business of the servicer, or (d) that may otherwise succeed to all or substantially all of the electric distribution business of the servicer, shall be the successor to the servicer under this Agreement; provided the following conditions are met:

 

103


Table of Contents
   

the successor to the servicer must execute an agreement of assumption to perform every obligation of the servicer under the servicing agreement;

 

   

immediately after giving effect to the transaction, no servicer default and no event that, after notice or lapse of time, or both, would become a servicer default shall have occurred and be continuing;

 

   

the servicer has delivered to the issuing entity, the trustee and the rating agencies an officer’s certificate and an opinion of counsel stating that the transfer complies with the servicing agreement and all conditions to the transfer under the servicing agreement have been complied with; and

 

   

the servicer has given prior written notice to the rating agencies.

So long as the conditions of any such assumptions are met, then the prior servicer will automatically be released from its obligations under the servicing agreement.

The servicing agreement permits the servicer to appoint any person to perform any or all of its obligations.

However, unless the appointed person is an affiliate of Evergy Missouri West, appointment must satisfy the rating agency condition. In all cases, the servicer must remain obligated and liable under the servicing agreement.

Servicer Defaults

Servicer defaults under the servicing agreement will include (each, a servicer default):

 

   

any failure by the servicer to remit any amount, including payments arising from the securitized utility tariff charges into the collection account as required under the servicing agreement, which failure continues unremedied for five business days after written notice from the issuing entity or the trustee is received by the servicer or after discovery of the failure by an officer of the servicer;

 

   

any failure by the servicer to duly perform its obligations to make securitized utility tariff charge adjustment submissions in the time and manner set forth in the servicing agreement, which failure continues unremedied for a period of five days;

 

   

any failure by the servicer or, if the servicer is Evergy Missouri West or an affiliate of Evergy Missouri West, by Evergy Missouri West to observe or perform in any material respect any covenants or agreements in the servicing agreement or the other basic documents to which it is a party, which failure materially and adversely affects the rights of bondholders and which continues unremedied for 60 days after written notice of this failure has been given to the servicer or, if the servicer is Evergy Missouri West or an affiliate of Evergy Missouri West, by the issuing entity or by the trustee or after such failure is discovered by an officer of the servicer;

 

   

any representation or warranty made by the servicer in the servicing agreement or any basic document proves to have been incorrect in a material respect when made, which has a material adverse effect on the bondholders and which material adverse effect continues unremedied for a period of 60 days after the giving of written notice to the servicer by the issuing entity or the trustee after such failure is discovered by an officer of the servicer; and

 

   

events of bankruptcy, insolvency, receivership or liquidation of the servicer.

Rights Upon a Servicer Default

As long as a default under a servicing agreement remains unremedied, either the trustee for the securitized utility tariff bonds or the holders of a majority of the outstanding principal amount of the securitized utility tariff bonds may terminate all the rights and obligations of the servicer under that servicing agreement. However, the servicer’s obligation to continue performing its functions as servicer may not be terminated until a successor servicer is appointed. After the termination, removal or resignation of the servicer, the issuing entity, with the prior written consent of the trustee, will appoint a successor servicer who will succeed to all the responsibilities, duties and liabilities of the servicer under that servicing agreement. Any successor servicer must also be approved by the MPSC.

 

104


Table of Contents

The issuing entity, with the prior written consent of the trustee, may appoint, or petition the MPSC or a court of competent jurisdiction for the appointment of, a successor servicer, subject to satisfaction of the rating agency condition and all MPSC regulations.

In no event shall the trustee be liable for its or the issuing entity’s appointment of a successor servicer. The trustee’s expenses incurred to appoint a successor shall be at the sole expense of the issuing entity and payable from the collection account as provided in the indenture.

In addition, if the servicer defaults in any obligation to remit required amounts to the trustee, the financing order allows holders of securitized utility tariff bonds and the trustees and representatives of those holders, the issuing entity or the issuing entity’s assignees, and pledgees and transferees of the securitized utility tariff property for the related series of securitized utility tariff bonds to petition a court to order the sequestration and payment to the trustee of revenues arising from the related securitized utility tariff property. If, however, the servicer is in bankruptcy, the holders of the securitized utility tariff bonds and their trustees and representatives, the issuing entity, the issuing entity’s assignees and the pledgees and transferees of the securitized utility tariff property, and a court may be prohibited from obtaining or enforcing such an order. Furthermore, the issuing entity, the trustee, the holders of the securitized utility tariff bonds, and a court may be prohibited from replacing the servicer if it is in bankruptcy. Please read “Risk Factors—Risks Associated with Potential Bankruptcy Proceedings of the Seller or the Servicer” and “How a Bankruptcy May Affect Your Investment” in this prospectus.

Waiver of Past Defaults

Holders of a series of securitized utility tariff bonds evidencing not less than a majority in principal amount of the then outstanding securitized utility tariff bonds, on behalf of all holders, may direct the trustee to waive in writing any default by the servicer in the performance of its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement and its consequences, except a default in making any required remittances to the trustee for deposit into the collection account for that series under the applicable servicing agreement.

Successor Servicer

Under the servicing agreement, if for any reason a third party assumes the role of the servicer under the servicing agreements, the servicer must cooperate with the issuing entity and with the trustee and the successor servicer in terminating the servicer’s rights and responsibilities under the servicing agreements, including the transfer to the successor servicer of all cash amounts then held by the servicer for remittance or subsequently acquired.

Furthermore, even if the issuing entity appoints a successor servicer, a successor servicer may encounter difficulties in collecting the securitized utility tariff charges and determining appropriate true-up adjustments to the fixed recover charges. Any successor servicer may have less experience than Evergy Missouri West and less capable systems than those that Evergy Missouri West uses. The appointment of any successor servicer must also be approved by the MPSC but no entity shall replace Evergy Missouri West as servicer in the future if the replacement would cause a downgrade in the ratings of the securitized utility tariff bonds. Please read “Risk Factors—Servicing Forecasting Risks—Your investment in the securitized utility tariff bonds depends on Evergy Missouri West or its successor or assignee, acting as servicer of the securitized utility tariff property” and “Risk Factors—Servicing Forecasting Risks—It might be difficult for successor servicers to collect the securitized utility tariff charges from Evergy Missouri West’s customers” in this prospectus.

Amendment

The servicing agreement may be amended by the servicer and the issuing entity with prior written notice given to the rating agencies and the prior written consent of the trustee, but without the consent of any of the holders of securitized utility tariff bonds, to cure any ambiguity, to correct or supplement any provisions in the servicing agreement, to add securitized utility tariff property subject to the servicing agreement or for the purpose of adding any provisions to or changing in any manner or eliminating any of the provisions in the servicing agreement or of modifying in any manner the rights of the holders of securitized utility tariff bonds; provided, however, that such

 

105


Table of Contents

action shall not adversely affect in any material respect the interests of any holder of securitized utility tariff bonds. For purposes of an amendment described in this paragraph, any amendment that increases the servicing fee payable to a successor servicer shall not be treated as adversely affecting the interests of any bondholder so long as the servicing fee is within the range approved in the financing order.

The servicing agreement may also be amended by the servicer and the issuing entity with prior written notice given to the rating agencies, the trustee and holders of securitized utility tariff bonds evidencing not less than a majority of the outstanding amount of the securitized utility tariff bonds, for the purpose of adding any provisions to or changing in any manner or eliminating any of the provisions of the servicing agreement or of modifying in any manner the rights of the holders of securitized utility tariff bonds; provided, however, that no such amendment shall (a) increase or reduce in any manner the amount of, or accelerate or delay the timing of collections of securitized utility tariff charges or (b) reduce the percentage of the outstanding amount of the securitized utility tariff bonds, the holders of which are required to consent to any such amendment, without the consent of the holders of all the outstanding securitized utility tariff bonds.

 

106


Table of Contents

HOW A BANKRUPTCY MAY AFFECT YOUR INVESTMENT

Challenge to True Sale Treatment

Evergy Missouri West will represent and warrant that the transfer of the securitized utility tariff property in accordance with the sale agreement constitutes a true and valid sale and assignment of that securitized utility tariff property by Evergy Missouri West to the issuing entity. It will be a condition of closing for the sale of the securitized utility tariff property pursuant to the sale agreement that Evergy Missouri West will take the appropriate actions under the Securitization Law to perfect this sale. The Securitization Law provides that a transfer of securitized utility tariff property by an electrical corporation to an affiliate or a financing entity (as defined in the Securitization Law) which the parties have in the governing documentation expressly stated to be a sale or other absolute transfer, in a transaction approved in a financing order, shall be treated as an absolute transfer of all the transferor’s right, title and interest, as in a “true sale,” and not as a pledge or other financing, of the relevant securitized utility tariff property, other than for federal and state income and franchise tax purposes. The issuing entity and Evergy Missouri West will treat such a transaction as a sale under applicable law. However, the issuing entity will expect that securitized utility tariff bonds will be reflected as debt on Evegry Missouri West’s consolidated financial statements. In addition, the issuing entity will anticipate that the securitized utility tariff bonds will be treated as debt of Evergy Missouri West for federal income tax purposes. Please read “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences” in this prospectus. In the event of a bankruptcy of a party to a sale agreement, if a party in interest in the bankruptcy were to take the position that the transfer of the securitized utility tariff property to the issuing entity pursuant to that sale agreement was a financing transaction and not a true sale under applicable creditors’ rights principles, there can be no assurance that a court would not adopt this position. Even if a court did not ultimately recharacterize the transaction as a financing transaction, the mere commencement of a bankruptcy of Evergy Missouri West and the attendant possible uncertainty surrounding the treatment of the transaction could result in delays in payments on the securitized utility tariff bonds.

In that regard, the issuing entity will note that the bankruptcy court in In re LTV Steel Company, Inc., et al., 274 B.R. 278 (Bankr. N. D. Oh. 2001) issued an interim order that observed that a debtor, LTV Steel Company, which had previously entered into securitization arrangements with respect both to its inventory and its accounts receivable may have “at least some equitable interest in the inventory and receivables, and that this interest is property of the Debtor’s estate sufficient to support the entry of” an interim order permitting the debtor to use proceeds of the property sold in the securitization. 274 B.R. at 285. The court based its decision in large part on its view of the equities of the case.

LTV and the securitization investors subsequently settled their dispute over the terms of the interim order and the bankruptcy court entered a final order in which the parties admitted and the court found that the pre-petition transactions constituted “true sales.” The court did not otherwise overrule its earlier ruling. The LTV memorandum opinion serves as an example of the pervasive equity powers of bankruptcy courts and the importance that such courts may ascribe to the goal of reorganization, particularly where the assets sold are integral to the ongoing operation of the debtor’s business.

Even if creditors did not challenge the sale of securitized utility tariff property as a true sale, a bankruptcy filing by Evergy Missouri West could trigger a bankruptcy filing by the issuing entity with similar negative consequences for bondholders. In a recent bankruptcy case, In re General Growth Properties, Inc., 406 B.R. 171, (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2009), General Growth Properties, Inc. filed for bankruptcy together with many of its direct and indirect subsidiaries, including many subsidiaries that were organized as special purpose vehicles. The bankruptcy court upheld the validity of the filings of these special purpose subsidiaries and allowed the subsidiaries, over the objections of their creditors, to use the lenders’ cash collateral to make loans to the parent for general corporate purposes. The creditors received adequate protection in the form of current interest payments and replacement liens to mitigate any diminution in value resulting from the use of the cash collateral, but the opinion serves as a reminder that bankruptcy courts may subordinate legal rights of creditors to the interests of helping debtors reorganize.

 

107


Table of Contents

The issuing entity and Evergy Missouri West will have attempted to mitigate the impact of a possible recharacterization of the sale of securitized utility tariff property from Evergy Missouri West to the issuing entity as a financing transaction under applicable creditors’ rights principles. The sale agreement will provide that if the transfer of the applicable securitized utility tariff property is thereafter recharacterized by a court as a financing transaction and not a true sale, Evergy Missouri West will be deemed to have granted to the issuing entity on behalf of the issuing entity and the trustee a first priority security interest in all of Evergy Missouri West’s right, title and interest in and to the securitized utility tariff property and all proceeds thereof. In addition, the sale agreement will require the filing of a financing statement naming Evergy Missouri West as the debtor and the issuing entity as the secured party and identifying the securitized utility tariff property and the proceeds thereof as collateral in accordance with the Securitization Law. As a result of this filing, the issuing entity would be a secured creditor of Evergy Missouri West and entitled to recover against the collateral or its value. This does not, however, eliminate the risk of payment delays or reductions and other adverse effects caused by an Evergy Missouri West bankruptcy.

The Securitization Law provides that the creation, granting, perfection and enforcement of liens and security interests in securitized utility tariff property are governed by Securitization Law and not by the Missouri UCC. Under the Securitization Law, a valid and enforceable lien and security interest in securitized utility tariff property arises when all of the following have taken place: the MPSC has issued a financing order authorizing the securitized utility tariff charges included in the securitized utility tariff property; value has been given by the pledgees of the securitized utility tariff property and the pledgor has signed a security agreement covering the securitized utility tariff property. Upon perfection through the filing of a financing statement with the Secretary of State of Missouri pursuant to rules established by the Secretary of State of Missouri in accordance with the Missouri UCC, the security interest shall be a continuously perfected lien and security interest in the securitized utility tariff property, with priority in the order of filing and taking precedence over any subsequent judicial or other lien creditor. None of this, however, eliminates the risk of payment delays and other adverse effects caused by an Evergy Missouri West bankruptcy.

If for any reason, a financing statement is not filed under the Securitization Law or the issuing entity fails to otherwise perfect the issuing entity’s interest in the securitized utility tariff property sold pursuant to the sale agreement, and the transfer is thereafter deemed not to constitute a true sale, the issuing entity would be an unsecured creditor of Evergy Missouri West.

Consolidation of the Issuing Entity and Evergy Missouri West

If Evergy Missouri West were to become a debtor in a bankruptcy case, a party in interest might attempt to substantively consolidate the assets and liabilities of Evergy Missouri West and the issuing entity. The issuing entity and Evergy Missouri West will have taken steps to attempt to minimize this risk. Please read “Evergy Missouri West Storm Funding I, LLC, The Issuing Entity” in this prospectus. However, no assurance can be given that if Evergy Missouri West were to become a debtor in a bankruptcy case, a court would not order that the issuing entity’s assets and liabilities be substantively consolidated with the assets and liabilities of Evergy Missouri West. Substantive consolidation would result in payment of the claims of the beneficial owners of the securitized utility tariff bonds to be subject to substantial delay and to adjustment in timing and amount under a plan of reorganization in the bankruptcy case.

Status of Securitized Utility Tariff Property as Current Property

Evergy Missouri West will represent in the sale agreement, and the Securitization Law provides, that the securitized utility tariff property sold pursuant to such sale agreement constitutes an existing, present intangible property right on the date that the securitized utility tariff property is first transferred or pledged in connection with the issuance of securitized utility tariff bonds. Nevertheless, no assurance can be given that, in the event of a bankruptcy of Evergy Missouri West, a court would not rule that the applicable securitized utility tariff property comes into existence only as retail electric customers use electricity.

If a court were to accept the argument that the applicable securitized utility tariff property comes into existence only as retail electric customers use electricity, no assurance can be given that a security interest in favor of the bondholders would attach to the securitized utility tariff charges in respect of electricity consumed after the commencement of the bankruptcy case or that the securitized utility tariff property has been sold to the issuing entity. If it were determined that the securitized utility tariff property had not been sold to the issuing entity, and the security interest in favor of the bondholders did not attach to the applicable securitized utility tariff charges in respect of electricity consumed after the commencement of the bankruptcy case, then the issuing entity would have an unsecured

 

108


Table of Contents

claim against Evergy Missouri West. In connection with any such court determination, there would be delays and/or reductions in payments on the securitized utility tariff bonds. Whether or not a court determined that securitized utility tariff property had been sold to the issuing entity pursuant to a sale agreement, no assurances can be given that a court would not rule that any securitized utility tariff charges relating to electricity consumed after the commencement of the bankruptcy could not be transferred to the issuing entity or the trustee.

In addition, in the event of a bankruptcy of Evergy Missouri West, a party in interest in the bankruptcy could assert that the issuing entity should pay, or that the issuing entity should be charged for, a portion of Evergy Missouri West’s costs associated with the transmission or distribution of the electricity, consumption of which gave rise to the securitized utility tariff charge receipts used to make payments on the securitized utility tariff bonds.

Regardless of whether Evergy Missouri West is the debtor in a bankruptcy case, if a court were to accept the argument that securitized utility tariff property sold pursuant to the sale agreement comes into existence only as customers use electricity, a tax or government lien or other nonconsensual lien on property of Evergy Missouri West arising before that securitized utility tariff property came into existence could have priority over the issuing entity’s interest in that securitized utility tariff property. Adjustments to the securitized utility tariff charges may be available to mitigate this exposure, although there may be delays in implementing these adjustments.

Estimation of Claims; Challenges to Indemnity Claims

If Evergy Missouri West were to become a debtor in a bankruptcy case, to the extent the issuing entity does not have secured claims as discussed above, claims, including indemnity claims, by the issuing entity or the trustee against Evergy Missouri West as seller under the sale agreement and the other documents executed in connection therewith would be unsecured claims and would be subject to being discharged in the bankruptcy case. In addition, a party in interest in the bankruptcy may request that the bankruptcy court estimate any contingent claims that the issuing entity or the trustee have against Evergy Missouri West. That party may then take the position that these claims should be estimated at zero or at a low amount because the contingency giving rise to these claims is unlikely to occur. If a court were to hold that the indemnity provisions were unenforceable, the issuing entity would be left with a claim for actual damages against Evergy Missouri West based on breach of contract principles. The actual amount of these damages would be subject to estimation and/or calculation by the court.

No assurances can be given as to the result of any of the above-described actions or claims. Furthermore, no assurance can be given as to what percentage of their claims, if any, unsecured creditors would receive in any bankruptcy proceeding involving Evergy Missouri West.

Enforcement of Rights by the Trustee

Upon an event of default under the indenture, the Securitization Law permits the trustee to enforce the security interest in the securitized utility tariff property sold pursuant to the sale agreement in accordance with the terms of the indenture. In this capacity, the trustee is permitted to request the MPSC or a court of competent jurisdiction to order the sequestration and payment to holders of securitized utility tariff bonds of all revenues arising from the applicable securitized utility tariff charges. There can be no assurance, however, that the MPSC or a district court judge would issue this order after a seller bankruptcy in light of the automatic stay provisions of Section 362 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. In that event, the trustee may under the indenture seek an order from the bankruptcy court lifting the automatic stay with respect to this action by the MPSC or a district court judge and an order requiring an accounting and segregation of the revenues arising from the securitized utility tariff property sold pursuant to the sale agreement. There can be no assurance that a court would grant either order.

Bankruptcy of the Servicer

The servicer is entitled to commingle the securitized utility tariff charges that it receives with its own funds until each date on which the servicer is required to remit funds to the trustee as specified in the servicing agreement. The Securitization Law provides that the relative priority of a lien created under the Securitization Law is not defeated or adversely affected by the commingling of securitized utility tariff charges arising with respect to the securitized utility tariff property with funds of the electrical corporation. In the event of a bankruptcy of the servicer, a party in

 

109


Table of Contents

interest in the bankruptcy might assert, and a court might rule, that the securitized utility tariff charges commingled by the servicer with its own funds and held by the servicer, prior to and as of the date of bankruptcy were property of the servicer as of that date, and are therefore property of the servicer’s bankruptcy estate, rather than the issuing entity’s property. If the court so rules, then the court would likely rule that the trustee has only a general unsecured claim against the servicer for the amount of commingled securitized utility tariff charges held as of that date and could not recover the commingled securitized utility tariff charges held as of the date of the bankruptcy.

However, if the court were to rule on the ownership of the commingled securitized utility tariff charges, the automatic stay arising upon the bankruptcy of the servicer could delay the trustee from receiving the commingled securitized utility tariff charges held by the servicer as of the date of the bankruptcy until the court grants relief from the stay. A court ruling on any request for relief from the stay could be delayed pending the court’s resolution of whether the commingled securitized utility tariff charges are the issuing entity’s property or are property of the servicer, including resolution of any tracing of proceeds issues.

The servicing agreement will provide that the trustee, as the issuing entity’s assignee, together with the other persons specified therein, may vote to appoint a successor servicer that satisfies the rating agency condition. The servicing agreement will also provide that the trustee, together with the other persons specified therein, may petition the MPSC or a court of competent jurisdiction to appoint a successor servicer that meets this criterion. However, the automatic stay in effect during a servicer bankruptcy might delay or prevent a successor servicer’s replacement of the servicer. Even if a successor servicer may be appointed and may replace the servicer, a successor servicer may be difficult to obtain and may not be capable of performing all of the duties that Evergy Missouri West as servicer was capable of performing. Furthermore, should the servicer enter into bankruptcy, it may be permitted to stop acting as servicer.

 

110


Table of Contents

USE OF PROCEEDS

The net proceeds of this offering are estimated to be approximately $                , after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and upfront financing costs. Proceeds will be used to pay expenses of issuance and to purchase the securitized utility tariff property from Evergy Missouri West. In accordance with the financing order, Evergy Missouri West will use the ultimate proceeds it receives from the sale of the securitized utility tariff property to recover the qualified extraordinary costs incurred by Evergy Missouri West in connection with the anomalous weather event Winter Storm Uri, as approved in the financing order.

 

111


Table of Contents

PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION

Subject to the terms and conditions in the underwriting agreement among the issuing entity, Evergy Missouri West and the underwriters, for whom                 ,                  and                  are acting as representatives, the issuing entity has agreed to sell to the underwriters, and the underwriters have severally agreed to purchase, the principal amount of the securitized utility tariff bonds listed opposite each underwriter’s name below:

 

Underwriter    Tranche      Tranche      Tranche  
   $        $        $    
   $        $        $    
   $        $        $    
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $        $        $    

Under the underwriting agreement, the underwriters will take and pay for all of the securitized utility tariff bonds the issuing entity will offer, if any is taken. If an underwriter defaults, the underwriting agreement provides that the purchase commitments of the non-defaulting underwriters may be increased or the underwriting agreement may be terminated.

The Underwriters’ Sales Price for the Securitized Utility Tariff Bonds

The securitized utility tariff bonds sold by the underwriters to the public will be initially offered at the prices to the public set forth on the cover of this prospectus. The underwriters propose initially to offer the securitized utility tariff bonds to dealers at such prices, less a selling concession not to exceed the percentage listed below for each tranche. The underwriters may allow, and dealers may re-allow, a discount not to exceed the percentage listed below for each tranche.

 

     Selling Concession    Reallowance Discount

Tranche

   %    %

Tranche

   %    %

Tranche

   %    %

After the initial public offering, the public offering prices, selling concessions and reallowance discounts may change.

No Assurance as to Resale Price or Resale Liquidity for the Securitized Utility Tariff Bonds

The securitized utility tariff bonds are a new issue of securities with no established trading market. They will not be listed on any securities exchange. The underwriters will have advised the issuing entity that they intend to make a market in the securitized utility tariff bonds, but they are not obligated to do so and may discontinue market making at any time without notice. The issuing entity will not be able to assure you that a liquid trading market will develop for the securitized utility tariff bonds.

Various Types of Underwriter Transactions that May Affect the Price of the Securitized Utility Tariff Bonds

The underwriters may engage in overallotment transactions, stabilizing transactions, syndicate covering transactions and penalty bids with respect to the securitized utility tariff bonds in accordance with Regulation M under the Exchange Act. Overallotment transactions involve syndicate sales in excess of the offering size, which create a syndicate short position. Stabilizing transactions are bids to purchase the securitized utility tariff bonds, which are permitted, so long as the stabilizing bids do not exceed a specific maximum price. Syndicate covering transactions involve purchases of the securitized utility tariff bonds in the open market after the distribution has been completed in order to cover syndicate short positions. Penalty bids permit the underwriters to reclaim a selling concession from

 

112


Table of Contents

a syndicate member when the securitized utility tariff bonds originally sold by the syndicate member are purchased in a syndicate covering transaction. These overallotment transactions, stabilizing transactions, syndicate covering transactions and penalty bids may cause the prices of the securitized utility tariff bonds to be higher than they would otherwise be. Neither the issuing entity, Evergy Missouri West, the trustee, the issuing entity’s managers nor any of the underwriters will represent that the underwriters will engage in any of these transactions or that these transactions, if commenced, will not be discontinued without notice at any time.

Certain of the underwriters and their affiliates have in the past provided, and may in the future from time to time provide, investment banking and general financing and banking services to Evergy Missouri West and its affiliates for which they have in the past received, and in the future may receive, customary fees. In addition, each underwriter may from time to time take positions in the securitized utility tariff bonds.

The depositor estimates that the issuing entity’s share of the total expenses of the offering will be $                .

The issuing entity and Evergy Missouri West will have agreed to indemnify the underwriters against some liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or to contribute to payments the underwriters may be required to make in respect of those liabilities.

The underwriters are offering the securitized utility tariff bonds, subject to prior sale, when, as and if issued to and accepted by them, subject to approval of legal matters, including the validity of the securitized utility tariff bonds and other conditions contained in the underwriting agreement, such as receipt of ratings confirmations, officers’ certificates and legal opinions. The underwriters reserve the right to withdraw, cancel or modify offers to the public and to reject offers in whole or in part.

The issuing entity will expect to deliver the securitized utility tariff bonds against payment for the securitized utility tariff bonds on or about the date specified in the last paragraph of the cover page of this prospectus, which will be the fifth business day following the date of pricing of the securitized utility tariff bonds. Since trades in the secondary market generally settle in two business days, purchasers who wish to trade securitized utility tariff bonds on the date of pricing or the succeeding three business days will be required, by virtue of the fact that the securitized utility tariff bonds initially will settle in T+6, to specify alternative settlement arrangements to prevent a failed settlement.

AFFILIATIONS AND CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

The issuing entity is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Evergy Missouri West. Evergy Missouri West is a wholly-owned operating subsidiary of Evergy. Each of the sponsor, the initial servicer and the depositor may maintain other banking relationships in the ordinary course with The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, National Association.

 

113


Table of Contents

MATERIAL U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES

General

The following is a general discussion of the material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the purchase, ownership and disposition of the securitized utility tariff bonds. Except as specifically provided below with respect to Non-U.S. Holders (as defined below), this discussion does not address the tax consequences to persons other than initial purchasers who are U.S. Holders (as defined below) that hold their securitized utility tariff bonds as capital assets within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Internal Revenue Code, and it does not address all of the tax consequences relevant to investors that are subject to special treatment under the U.S. federal income tax laws (such as financial institutions, life insurance companies, retirement plans, regulated investment companies, persons who hold securitized utility tariff bonds as part of a “straddle,” a “hedge” or a “conversion transaction,” persons that have a “functional currency” other than the U.S. dollar, investors in pass-through entities and tax-exempt organizations). This summary also does not address the consequences to holders of the securitized utility tariff bonds under state, local or foreign tax laws. However, by acquiring a securitized utility tariff bond, a bondholder agrees to treat the securitized utility tariff bond as a debt of Evergy Missouri West to the extent consistent with applicable state, local and other tax law unless otherwise required by appropriate taxing authorities.

This summary is based on current provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, the Treasury Regulations promulgated and proposed thereunder, judicial decisions and published administrative rulings and pronouncements of the IRS and interpretations thereof. All of these authorities and interpretations are subject to change, and any change may apply retroactively and affect the accuracy of the opinions, statements and conclusions set forth in this discussion.

U.S. Holder and Non-U.S. Holder Defined

A “U.S. Holder means a beneficial owner of a securitized utility tariff bond that, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, is (i) a citizen or individual resident of the U.S., (ii) a corporation (including an entity treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes) created or organized in or under the laws of the U.S., any state thereof or the District of Columbia, (iii) an estate the income of which is includible in gross income for U.S. federal income tax purposes regardless of its source, or (iv) a trust if (A) a court in the U.S. is able to exercise primary supervision over the administration of the trust and one or more U.S. persons have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust, or (B) it has a valid election in place to be treated as a U.S. person. A “Non-U.S. Holder means a beneficial owner of a securitized utility tariff bond that is not a U.S. Holder but does not include (i) an entity or arrangement treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes, (ii) a former citizen of the U.S. or (iii) a former resident of the U.S.

If an entity or arrangement treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes is a holder of a securitized utility tariff bond, the U.S. federal income tax treatment of a partner will generally depend on the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. Partners are encouraged to consult their tax advisors about the particular U.S. federal income tax consequences applicable to them. Similarly, former citizens and former residents of the U.S. are encouraged to consult their tax advisors about the particular U.S. federal income tax consequences that may be applicable to them.

ALL PROSPECTIVE INVESTORS ARE ENCOURAGED TO CONSULT THEIR TAX ADVISORS REGARDING THE FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES OF PURCHASING, OWNING AND DISPOSING OF SECURITIZED UTILITY TARIFF BONDS IN LIGHT OF THEIR PARTICULAR CIRCUMSTANCES, AS WELL AS THE EFFECT OF ANY FOREIGN, STATE, LOCAL OR OTHER LAWS.

Taxation of the Issuing Entity and Characterization of the Securitized Utility Tariff Bonds

Based on Revenue Procedure 2005-62, 2005-2 CB 507, it is the opinion of Hunton, as tax counsel, that for U.S. federal income tax purposes, (1) the issuance of the securitized utility tariff bonds will be a “qualifying securitization” within the meaning of Revenue Procedure 2005-62, (2) the issuing entity will not be treated as a taxable entity separate and apart from Evergy Missouri West, (3) the securitized utility tariff bonds will be treated as debt of Evergy Missouri West and (4) Evergy Missouri West will not be treated as recognizing gross income upon the issuance

 

114


Table of Contents

of the securitized utility tariff bonds. By acquiring a securitized utility tariff bond, a beneficial owner agrees to treat the securitized utility tariff bond as debt of Evergy Missouri West for U.S. federal income tax purposes. This opinion is based on certain representations made by the issuing entity and Evergy Missouri West, on the application of current law to the facts as established by the indenture and other relevant documents and assumes compliance with the indenture and such other documents as in effect on the date of issuance of the securitized utility tariff bonds.

Tax Consequences to U.S. Holders

Interest

Interest income on the securitized utility tariff bonds, payable at a fixed rate, will be includible in income by a U.S. Holder when it is received, in the case of a U.S. Holder using the cash receipts and disbursements method of tax accounting, or as it accrues, in the case of a U.S. Holder using the accrual method of tax accounting.

Original Issue Discount

One or more classes of securitized utility tariff bonds may be issued with original issue discount (“OID”). Notwithstanding a U.S. Holder’s usual method of tax accounting, any OID on a class of securitized utility tariff bond will be includible in the U.S. Holder’s income when it accrues in accordance with the constant yield method, which takes into account the compounding of interest, in advance of receipt of the cash attributable to such income. In general, a class of securitized utility tariff bond will be treated as issued with OID if the “stated redemption price at maturity” of that class of securitized utility tariff bond (ordinarily, the initial principal amount of that class of securitized utility tariff bonds) exceeds the “issue price” of that class of securitized utility tariff bond (ordinarily, the price at which a substantial amount of that class of securitized utility tariff bond is sold to the public) by more than a statutorily defined “de minimis” amount.

Sale or Retirement of Securitized Utility Tariff Bonds

On a sale, exchange or retirement of a securitized utility tariff bond, a U.S. Holder will have taxable gain or loss equal to the difference between the amount received by the U.S. Holder and the U.S. Holder’s tax basis in the securitized utility tariff bond. A U.S. Holder’s tax basis in a securitized utility tariff bond is the U.S. Holder’s cost, subject to adjustments such as increases in basis for any OID previously included in income and reductions in basis for principal payments received previously. Gain or loss will generally be capital gain or loss, and will be long-term capital gain or loss if the securitized utility tariff bond was held for more than one year at the time of disposition. If a U.S. Holder sells the securitized utility tariff bond between interest payment dates, a portion of the amount received will reflect interest that has accrued on the securitized utility tariff bond but that has not yet been paid by the sale date. To the extent that amount has not already been included in the U.S. Holder’s income, it will be treated as ordinary interest income and not as capital gain.

3.8% Tax on “Net Investment Income”

Certain non-corporate U.S. Holders will be subject to an additional 3.8% tax on all or a portion of their “net investment income,” which may include the interest payments and any gain realized with respect to the securitized utility tariff bonds, to the extent of their net investment income that, when added to their other modified adjusted gross income, exceeds $200,000 for an unmarried individual, $250,000 for a married taxpayer filing a joint return (or a surviving spouse), or $125,000 for a married individual filing a separate return. The 3.8% tax is determined in a manner different from the regular income tax.

Tax Consequences to Non-U.S. Holders

Withholding Tax on Interest

 

115


Table of Contents

Subject to the discussion of FATCA and backup withholding below, payments of interest income on the securitized utility tariff bonds received by a Non-U.S. Holder that does not hold its securitized utility tariff bonds in connection with the conduct of a trade or business in the U.S. will generally not be subject to U.S. federal withholding tax, provided that the Non-U.S. Holder does not actually or constructively own 10% or more of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of Evergy entitled to vote, is not a controlled foreign corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes directly or indirectly related to Evergy within the meaning of Section 881(c)(3)(C) of the Internal Revenue Code, is not a bank whose receipt of interest on the securitized utility tariff bonds is described in Section 881(c)(3)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code, is not an individual who ceased being a U.S. citizen or long-term resident for tax avoidance purposes, and the withholding agent receives:

 

   

from a Non-U.S. Holder appropriate documentation to treat the payment as made to a foreign beneficial owner under Treasury Regulations issued under Section 1441 of the Internal Revenue Code;

 

   

a withholding certificate from a person claiming to be a foreign partnership and the foreign partnership has received appropriate documentation to treat the payment as made to a foreign beneficial owner in accordance with these Treasury Regulations;

 

   

a withholding certificate from a person representing to be a “intermediary” that has assumed primary withholding responsibility under these Treasury Regulations and the intermediary has received appropriate documentation from a foreign beneficial owner in accordance with its agreement with the IRS; or

 

   

a statement, under penalties of perjury from an authorized representative of a financial institution, stating that the financial institution has received from the beneficial owner a withholding certificate described in these Treasury Regulations or that it has received a similar statement from another financial institution acting on behalf of the foreign beneficial owner and a copy of such withholding certificate.

In general, it will not be necessary for a Non-U.S. Holder to obtain or furnish a U.S. taxpayer identification number to Evergy Missouri West or its paying agent in order to claim the foregoing exemption from U.S. withholding tax on payments of interest. Interest paid to a Non-U.S. Holder will be subject to a U.S. withholding tax of 30% upon the actual payment of interest income, except as described above and except where an applicable income tax treaty provides for the reduction or elimination of the withholding tax and the Non-U.S. Holder provides a withholding certificate properly establishing such reduction or elimination. A Non-U.S. Holder generally will be taxable in the same manner as a U.S. corporation or resident with respect to interest income if the income is effectively connected with the Non-U.S. Holder’s conduct of a trade or business in the U.S. (and, if required by an applicable income tax treaty, is attributable to a permanent establishment maintained by the Non-U.S. Holder in the U.S.). Effectively connected income received by a Non-U.S. Holder that is a corporation may in some circumstances be subject to an additional “branch profits tax” at a 30% rate, or if applicable, a lower rate provided by an income tax treaty. To avoid having the 30% withholding tax imposed on effectively connected interest income, the Non-U.S. Holder must provide a withholding certificate on which the Non-U.S. Holder certifies, among other facts, that payments on the securitized utility tariff bonds are effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business in the U.S.

Capital Gains Tax Issues

Subject to the discussion of backup withholding below, a Non-U.S. Holder generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income or withholding tax on gain realized on the sale or exchange of securitized utility tariff bonds, unless:

 

   

the Non-U.S. Holder is an individual who is present in the U.S. for 183 days or more during the taxable year and this gain is from U.S. sources; or

 

   

the gain is effectively connected with the conduct by the Non-U.S. Holder of a trade or business in the U.S. (and, if required by an applicable income tax treaty, is attributable to a permanent establishment maintained by the Non-U.S. Holder in the U.S.).

FATCA

Under the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (“FATCA”), a 30% withholding tax is generally imposed on certain payments, including payments of U.S.-source interest made to “foreign financial institutions” and certain other foreign financial entities if those foreign entities fail to comply with the requirements of FATCA. The withholding agent will be required to withhold amounts under FATCA on payments made to Non-U.S. Holders that are subject to the FATCA requirements but fail to provide the withholding agent with proof that they have complied with such requirements.

 

116


Table of Contents

Backup Withholding

Backup withholding of U.S. federal income tax may apply to payments made in respect of the securitized utility tariff bonds to registered owners who are not “exempt recipients” and who fail to provide certain identifying information (such as the registered owner’s taxpayer identification number) in the required manner. Generally, individuals are not exempt recipients, whereas corporations and certain other entities generally are exempt recipients. Payments made in respect of the securitized utility tariff bonds to a U.S. Holder must be reported to the IRS, unless the U.S. Holder is an exempt recipient or establishes an exemption. A U.S. Holder can obtain a complete exemption from the backup withholding tax by providing a properly completed Form W-9 (Request for Taxpayer Identification Number and Certification). Compliance with the identification procedures described above under “—Tax Consequences to Non-U.S. Holders—Withholding Tax on Interest” in this prospectus would establish an exemption from backup withholding for those Non-U.S. Holders who are not exempt recipients.

In addition, backup withholding of U.S. federal income tax may apply upon the sale of a securitized utility tariff bond to (or through) a broker, unless either (1) the broker determines that the seller is an exempt recipient or (2) the seller provides, in the required manner, certain identifying information and, in the case of a Non-U.S. Holder, certifies that the seller is a Non-U.S. Holder (and certain other conditions are met). The sale may also be reported by the broker to the IRS, unless either (a) the broker determines that the seller is an exempt recipient or (b) the seller certifies its non-U.S. status (and certain other conditions are met). Certification of the seller’s non-U.S. status would be made normally on an IRS Form W-8BEN signed under penalty of perjury, although in certain cases it may be possible to submit other documentary evidence. A sale of a securitized utility tariff bond to (or through) a non-U.S. office of a broker generally will not be subject to information reporting or backup withholding unless the broker is a U.S. person or has certain connections to the U.S.

Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules from a payment to a beneficial owner would be allowed as a refund or a credit against such beneficial owner’s U.S. federal income tax provided the required information is timely furnished to the IRS.

 

117


Table of Contents

STATE AND OTHER TAX CONSEQUENCES

In addition to the federal income tax consequences described in “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences” in this prospectus, potential investors should consider the state and local tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of the energy securitized utility tariff bonds offered by this prospectus. State tax law may differ substantially from the corresponding federal tax law, and the discussion above does not purport to describe any aspect of the tax laws of any state or other jurisdiction. Therefore, prospective investors should consult their tax advisors about the various tax consequences of investments in the securitized utility tariff bonds offered by this prospectus.

 

118


Table of Contents

ERISA CONSIDERATIONS

The following is a summary of certain considerations associated with the acquisition, holding and disposition of the securitized utility tariff bonds by, on behalf of, or using assets of, employee benefit plans and other arrangements that are subject to Title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, (“ERISA”), or Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code. For purposes of this discussion, “plans” include (1) an “employee benefit plan” as defined in Section 3(3) of ERISA that is subject to Title I of ERISA, including, but not limited to, a profit sharing plan or a pension plan, (2) a “plan” as defined in Section 4975(e)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code that is subject to Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code, including, but not limited to, an individual retirement account or annuity or a Keogh plan, and (3) an entity that is deemed to hold plan assets of any of the foregoing by virtue of such employee benefit plan’s or plan’s investment in the entity, including, but not limited to, a collective investment fund or an insurance company general or separate account.

General Fiduciary Matters

ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code impose certain duties on persons who are fiduciaries with respect to a plan. A fiduciary is any person who in connection with the assets of the plan:

 

   

has discretionary authority or control over the management or disposition of such assets, or

 

   

provides investment advice for a fee with respect to such assets.

ERISA imposes certain general fiduciary requirements on fiduciaries, including, but not limited to:

 

   

investment prudence and diversification, and

 

   

the investment of the assets of the plan in accordance with the documents governing the plan.

In considering an investment in the securitized utility tariff bonds, the fiduciary of a plan should determine whether the investment is in accordance with the documents and instruments governing the plan and the applicable provisions of ERISA or the Internal Revenue Code relating to the fiduciary’s duties to the plan, including, but not limited to, the duties of investment prudence and diversification, and delegation of control under ERISA, and the prohibited transaction provisions of ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code.

Prohibited Transaction Issues

Section 406 of ERISA and Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code prohibit a broad range of transactions involving the assets of a plan and persons who have certain specified relationships to the plan, referred to as “parties in interest,” as defined under ERISA or “disqualified persons” as defined under Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code unless a statutory or administrative exemption is available. The types of transactions that are prohibited include but, are not limited to:

 

   

sales, exchanges or leases of property;

 

   

loans or other extensions of credit; and

 

   

the furnishing of goods or services.

Certain persons that participate in a prohibited transaction may be subject to an excise tax under Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code or a penalty imposed under Section 501(i) of ERISA, unless a statutory or administrative exemption is available. In addition, the persons involved in the prohibited transaction may have to cancel or unwind the transaction and/or a fiduciary with respect to a plan may have to pay an amount to the plan for any losses realized by the plan or profits realized by these persons. In addition, individual retirement accounts involved in the prohibited transaction may be impacted which would result in adverse tax consequences to the owner of the account.

 

119


Table of Contents

Plan Asset Issues

A fiduciary’s investment of the assets of a plan in the securitized utility tariff bonds may cause the issuing entity’s assets to be deemed “plan assets” of the investing plan. United States Department of Labor has issued regulations at 29 C.F.R. Section 2510.3-101, as modified by Section 3(42) of ERISA (collectively, the “plan asset regulations”) concerning the definition of what constitutes “plan assets” of a plan for purposes of the fiduciary responsibility and prohibited transaction provisions of Title I of ERISA and the prohibited transaction provisions of Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code. Under the plan asset regulations, generally when a plan acquires an “equity interest” in an entity that is neither a “publicly offered security” (within the meaning of the plan asset regulations) nor a security issued by an investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, the plan’s assets include both the equity interest and an undivided interest in each of the underlying assets of the entity, unless it is established that an exception set forth in the plan asset regulation is applicable. The plan’s assets generally will not include the underlying assets of the entity, if less than 25% of the total value of each class of equity interests in the entity is held by “benefit plan investors” or the entity is an “operating company,” (as each of those terms is defined in the plan asset regulations). An equity interest is defined in the plan asset regulations as an interest in an entity other than an instrument which is treated as indebtedness under applicable local law and which has no substantial equity features. Although there is no authority directly on point, it is anticipated that the securitized utility tariff bonds should not be treated as equity interests in the issuing entity for purposes of the plan asset regulations.

If the securitized utility tariff bonds were deemed to be equity interests in the issuing entity and none of the exceptions contained in the plan asset regulations were applicable, then the issuing entity’s assets would be considered to be assets of any plans that acquire the securitized utility tariff bonds. If the issuing entity’s assets were deemed to constitute “plan assets” pursuant to the plan asset regulations, transactions the issuing entity might enter into, or may have entered into in the ordinary course of business, might constitute non-exempt prohibited transactions under ERISA or Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code. Each prospective plan investor should make its own assessment as to whether or not the securitized utility tariff bonds will be treated as equity interests in the issuing entity for purposes of the plan asset regulations, and should consult with its own legal advisors concerning the potential consequences of the application of the plan asset regulations, the fiduciary responsibility provisions of ERISA and the prohibited transaction provisions of Title I of ERISA and Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code to an investment in the securitized utility tariff bonds by, on behalf of, or with assets of a plan.

Prohibited Transaction Exemptions

Without regard to whether the securitized utility tariff bonds are characterized as equity interests in the issuing entity for purposes of the plan asset regulations, the acquisition, holding or disposition of the securitized utility tariff bonds by, on behalf of, or with assets of a plan could give rise to a prohibited transaction under ERISA or Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code if the issuing entity or the trustee, Evergy Missouri West, any other servicer, Evergy Missouri West Corporation, any underwriter or certain of their affiliates is or becomes a party in interest or disqualified person with respect to an investing plan.

If you are a fiduciary of a plan, before acquiring any securitized utility tariff bonds, you should consider the availability of one of the Department of Labor’s prohibited transaction class exemptions, referred to as PTCEs, or one of the statutory exemptions provided by ERISA or Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code, which include:

 

   

PTCE 75-1, which exempts certain transactions between a plan and certain broker-dealers, reporting dealers and banks;

 

   

PTCE 84-14, which exempts certain transactions effected on behalf of a plan by a “qualified professional asset manager”;

 

   

PTCE 90-1, which exempts certain transactions between insurance company separate accounts and parties in interest;

 

   

PTCE 91-38, which exempts certain transactions between bank collective investment funds and parties in interest;

 

   

PTCE 95-60, which exempts certain transactions between insurance company general accounts and parties in interest;

 

   

PTCE 96-23, which exempts certain transactions effected on behalf of a plan by an “in-house asset manager”; and

 

   

the statutory service provider exemption provided by Section 408(b)(17) of ERISA and Section 4975(d)(20) of the Internal Revenue Code, which exempts certain transactions between plans and parties in interest that are not fiduciaries with respect to the transaction.

 

120


Table of Contents

The issuing entity cannot provide any assurance that any of these class exemptions or statutory exemptions or any other prohibited transaction exemptions will apply with respect to any particular investment in the securitized utility tariff bonds by, on behalf of, or using assets of, a plan or, even if it were deemed to apply, that any exemption would apply to all transactions that may occur in connection with the investment. Even if one of these class exemptions or the statutory exemption were deemed to apply, securitized utility tariff bonds may not be purchased with assets of any plan if the issuing entity or the trustee, Evergy Missouri West, any other servicer, Evergy Missouri West Corporation, any underwriter or any of their affiliates:

 

   

has investment discretion over the assets of the plan used to purchase the securitized utility tariff bonds;

 

   

has authority or responsibility to give, or regularly gives, investment advice regarding the assets of the plan used to acquire the securitized utility tariff bonds, for a fee and under an agreement or understanding that the advice will serve as a primary basis for investment decisions for the assets of the plan, and will be based on the particular investment needs of the plan.

Before acquiring any securitized utility tariff bonds by or on behalf of, or using assets of, a plan, you should consider whether the acquisition, holding or disposition of securitized utility tariff bonds might constitute or result in a non-exempt prohibited transaction under ERISA or Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code and, if so, whether any prohibited transaction exemption might apply to the acquisition, holding and disposition of the securitized utility tariff bonds.

Other Plans

Some plans, such as governmental plans, and certain church plans, and the fiduciaries of those plans, are not subject to requirements of ERISA or Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code (“non-ERISA plans”); provided, however such non-ERISA plans may be subject to federal, state, local or other laws that are substantially similar to Title I of ERISA or Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code (“similar law”). Accordingly, assets of these plans may be invested in the securitized utility tariff bonds without regard to the ERISA considerations described above, subject to the application of similar law and the provisions of other applicable federal, including, for example, the prohibited transaction rules in Section 503 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Representation

By acquiring any interest in the securitized utility tariff bonds, each purchaser and subsequent transferee will be deemed to have represented and warranted that either (1) it is not a plan or non-ERISA plan subject to similar law and is not acting on behalf of, or using assets of, a plan or non-ERISA plan subject to similar law to acquire or hold the securitized utility tariff bonds or (2) its acquisition, holding and disposition of the securitized utility tariff bonds will not, in the case of a plan, constitute or result in a non-exempt prohibited transaction under ERISA or Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code or, in the case of non-ERISA plan subject to similar law, constitute or result in a violation of applicable similar law.

Consultation with Counsel

The sale of the securitized utility tariff bonds to a plan or a non-ERISA plan subject to similar law or any person acting on behalf of, or using assets of, such a plan or non-ERISA plan will not constitute a representation by the issuing entity or the trustee, Evergy Missouri West, any other servicer, Evergy Missouri West Corporation, any underwriter or any of their affiliates that such an investment meets all relevant legal requirements relating to investments by such plans or non-ERISA plans generally or by any particular plan or non-ERISA plan, or that such an investment is appropriate for such plans or non-ERISA plans generally or for a particular plan or non-ERISA plan.

 

121


Table of Contents

The foregoing discussion is general in nature and is not intended to be all-inclusive. Due to the complexity of these rules and the penalties that may be imposed upon persons involved in non-exempt prohibited transactions, it is particularly important that fiduciaries, or other persons considering purchasing the securitized utility tariff bonds on behalf of, or with the assets of, any plan or non-ERISA plan, should consider the general fiduciary obligations under ERISA, the prohibited transaction provisions under ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code or the provisions of applicable similar law and should consult with legal counsel as to the potential applicability of ERISA, any regulations thereto, the Internal Revenue Code or similar law to any investment and, in the case of plan, the availability of any prohibited transaction exemption in connection with any such investment.

This summary is based on current provisions of ERISA, the Internal Revenue Code, the regulations and other related guidance. All of these authorities and interpretations are subject to change, and any change may apply retroactively and affect the accuracy of the opinions, statements and conclusions set forth in this discussion.

 

122


Table of Contents

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Other than as disclosed herein, there are no legal or governmental proceedings pending against the issuing entity, the sponsor, seller, trustee, or servicer, or of which any property of the foregoing is subject, that is material to the holders of the securitized utility tariff bonds.

 

123


Table of Contents

RATINGS FOR THE SECURITIZED UTILITY TARIFF BONDS

The issuing entity expects that the securitized utility tariff bonds will receive credit ratings from at least two NRSROs. A security rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities and may be subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the assigning NRSRO. Each rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating. No person is obligated to maintain the rating on any securitized utility tariff bonds and, accordingly, the issuing entity can give no assurance that the ratings assigned to any tranche of the securitized utility tariff bonds upon initial issuance will not be lowered or withdrawn by a NRSRO at any time thereafter. If a rating of any tranche of securitized utility tariff bonds is lowered or withdrawn, the liquidity of this tranche of the securitized utility tariff bonds may be adversely affected. In general, ratings address credit risk and do not represent any assessment of any particular rate of principal payments on the securitized utility tariff bonds other than the payment in full of each tranche of the securitized utility tariff bonds by the final maturity date or tranche final maturity date, as well as the timely payment of interest.

Under Rule 17g-5 of the Exchange Act, NRSROs providing the sponsor with the requisite certification will have access to all information posted on a website by the sponsor for the purpose of determining the initial rating and monitoring the rating after the closing date in respect of the securitized utility tariff bonds. As a result, an NRSRO other than the NRSROs hired by a sponsor (a “hired NRSRO”) may issue unsolicited ratings on the securitized utility tariff bonds, which may be lower, and could be significantly lower, than the ratings assigned by a hired NRSROs. The unsolicited ratings may be issued prior to, or after, the closing date in respect of the securitized utility tariff bonds. Issuance of any unsolicited rating will not affect the issuance of the securitized utility tariff bonds. Issuance of an unsolicited rating lower than the ratings assigned by a hired NRSRO on the securitized utility tariff bonds might adversely affect the value of the securitized utility tariff bonds and, for regulated entities, could affect the status of the securitized utility tariff bonds as a legal investment or the capital treatment of the securitized utility tariff bonds. Investors in the securitized utility tariff bonds should consult with their legal counsel regarding the effect of the issuance of a rating by a non-hired NRSRO that is lower than the rating of a hired NRSRO.

A portion of the fees paid by Evergy Missouri West to a NRSRO which is hired to assign a rating on the securitized utility tariff bonds is contingent upon the issuance of the securitized utility tariff bonds. In addition to the fees paid by Evergy Missouri West to a NRSRO at closing, Evergy Missouri West will pay a fee to a NRSRO for ongoing surveillance for so long as the securitized utility tariff bonds are outstanding. However, no NRSRO is under any obligation to continue to monitor or provide a rating on the securitized utility tariff bonds.

 

124


Table of Contents

WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

This prospectus is part of a registration statement the issuing entity and Evergy Missouri West have filed with the SEC relating to the securitized utility tariff bonds. This prospectus describes the material terms of some of the documents that have been filed or will be filed as exhibits to the registration statement. However, this prospectus does not contain all of the information contained in the registration statement and the exhibits.

Information filed with the SEC can be inspected at the SEC’s Internet site located at http://www.sec.gov, or on a website associated with Evergy Missouri West, currently located at https://investors.evergy.com/. The information contained on such website is not part of this registration statement. Evergy Missouri West and the issuing entity are providing the address to this website solely for the information of investors and does not intend the address to be an active link. You may also obtain a copy of the issuing entity’s filings with the SEC at no cost, by writing to or telephoning the issuing entity at the following address:

Evergy Missouri West Storm Funding I, LLC

818 S. Kansas Avenue

Topeka, Kansas 66612

The issuing entity or Evergy Missouri West as depositor will also file with the SEC all of the periodic reports the issuing entity or the depositor are required to file under the Securities Exchange Act and the rules, regulations or orders of the SEC thereunder; however, neither the issuing entity nor Evergy Missouri West as depositor will intend to file any such reports relating to the securitized utility tariff bonds following completion of the reporting period required by Rule 15d-1 or Regulation 15D under the Exchange Act, unless required by law. Unless specifically stated in the report, the reports and any information included in the report will neither be examined nor reported on by an independent public accountant. A more detailed description of the information to be included in these periodic reports, please read “Description of the Securitized Utility Tariff Bonds —SEC Filings; Website Disclosure” in this prospectus.

 

125


Table of Contents

INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE

The SEC allows the issuing entity to “incorporate by reference” into this prospectus information the issuing entity or the depositor file with the SEC. This means the issuing entity can disclose important information to you by referring you to the documents containing the information. The information incorporated by reference is considered to be part of this prospectus, unless the issuing entity update or supersedes that information with information that the issuing entity or the depositor file subsequently that is incorporated by reference into this prospectus.

To the extent that the issuing entity is required by law to file such reports and information with the SEC under the Exchange Act, the issuing entity will file annual and current reports and other information with the SEC. The issuing entity is incorporating by reference any future filings the issuing entity or the sponsor, but solely in its capacity as the issuing entity’s sponsor, make with the SEC under Sections 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act prior to the termination of the offering, excluding any information that is furnished to, and not filed with, the SEC. These reports will be filed under the issuing entity’s own name as issuing entity. Under the Indenture, the issuing entity may voluntarily suspend or terminate the filing obligations as issuing entity (under the SEC rules) with the SEC, to the extent permitted by applicable law.

The issuing entity is incorporating into this prospectus any future distribution report on Form 10-D, current report on Form 8-K or any amendment to any such report which the issuing entity or Evergy Missouri West, solely in its capacity as the issuing entity’s depositor, make with the SEC until the offering of the securitized utility tariff bonds is completed. These reports will be filed under the issuing entity’s own name as issuing entity. In addition, these reports will be posted on a website associated with Evergy Missouri West, currently located at https://investors.evergy.com/. These reports will be filed under the issuing entity’s own name as issuing entity. Any statement contained in this prospectus or in a document incorporated or deemed to be incorporated by reference in this prospectus will be deemed to be modified or superseded for purposes of this prospectus to the extent that a statement contained in this prospectus or in any separately filed document which also is or is deemed to be incorporated by reference herein modifies or supersedes that statement. Any statement so modified or superseded will not be deemed, except as so modified or superseded, to constitute part of this prospectus.

 

126


Table of Contents

INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940 AND VOLCKER RULE MATTERS

The issuing entity will be relying on an exclusion from the definition of “investment company” under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, or the “1940 Act,” contained in Rule 3a-7 under the 1940 Act, although there may be additional exclusions or exemptions available to the issuing entity. As a result of such exclusion, the issuing entity will not be subject to regulation as an “investment company” under the 1940 Act.

In addition, the issuing entity is being structured so as not to constitute a “covered fund” for purposes of the Volcker Rule, or the “Volcker Rule,” under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Customer Protection Act, or the “Dodd-Frank Act.” As part of the Dodd-Frank Act, federal law prohibits a “banking entity”—which is broadly defined to include banks, bank holding companies and affiliates thereof—from engaging in proprietary trading or holding ownership interests in certain private funds. The definition of “covered fund” in the regulations adopted to implement the Volcker Rule includes (generally) any entity that would be an investment company under the 1940 Act but for the exclusion provided under Sections 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7) thereunder. Because the issuing entity will rely on Rule 3a-7 under the 1940 Act, it will not be considered a “covered fund” within the meaning of the Volcker Rule regulations.

 

127


Table of Contents

RISK RETENTION

This offering of securitized utility tariff bonds is a public utility securitization exempt from the risk retention requirements imposed by Section 15G of the Exchange Act due to the exemption provided in Rule 19(b)(8) of Regulation RR.

For information regarding the requirements of the European Union Securitization Regulation as to risk retention and other matters, please read “Risk Factors—Other Risks Associated with an Investment in the Securitized Utility Tariff Bonds—Regulatory provisions affecting certain investors could adversely affect the price and liquidity of the securitized utility tariff bonds” in this prospectus.

 

128


Table of Contents

LEGAL MATTERS

Certain legal matters relating to the securitized utility tariff bonds, including certain federal income tax matters, will be passed on by Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP, counsel to Evergy Missouri West and the issuing entity. Certain other legal matters relating to the securitized utility tariff bonds and as to Delaware law will be passed on by Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., special Delaware counsel to the issuing entity. Certain other legal matters relating to the securitized utility tariff bonds will be passed on by Dentons US LLP, Kansas City, Missouri, regulatory counsel to Evergy Missouri West, and by Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP, counsel to the underwriters.

 

129


Table of Contents

OFFERING RESTRICTIONS IN CERTAIN JURISDICTIONS

NOTICE TO RESIDENTS OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA

THE SECURITIZED UTILITY TARIFF BONDS ARE NOT INTENDED TO BE OFFERED, SOLD OR OTHERWISE MADE AVAILABLE TO, AND SHOULD NOT BE OFFERED, SOLD OR OTHERWISE MADE AVAILABLE TO, ANY RETAIL INVESTOR IN THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA (EEA”). FOR THESE PURPOSES, THE EXPRESSION RETAIL INVESTOR MEANS A PERSON WHO IS ONE (OR MORE) OF THE FOLLOWING: (1) A RETAIL CLIENT AS DEFINED IN POINT (11) OF ARTICLE 4(1) OF DIRECTIVE 2014/65/EU (AS AMENDED, MIFID II”); (2) A CUSTOMER WITHIN THE MEANING OF DIRECTIVE (EU) 2016/97 (AS AMENDED), WHERE THAT CUSTOMER WOULD NOT QUALIFY AS A PROFESSIONAL CLIENT AS DEFINED IN POINT (10) OF ARTICLE 4(1) OF MIFID II; OR (3) NOT A QUALIFIED INVESTOR (QUALIFIED INVESTOR”) WITHIN THE MEANING OF REGULATION 2017/1129 (AS AMENDED, THE PROSPECTUS REGULATION”). CONSEQUENTLY NO KEY INFORMATION DOCUMENT REQUIRED BY REGULATION (EU) NO 1286/2014 (AS AMENDED, THE PRIIPS REGULATION”) FOR OFFERING OR SELLING THE SECURITIZED UTILITY TARIFF BONDS OR OTHERWISE MAKING THEM AVAILABLE TO RETAIL INVESTORS IN THE EEA HAS BEEN PREPARED; AND THEREFORE OFFERING OR SELLING THE SECURITIZED UTILITY TARIFF BONDS OR OTHERWISE MAKING THEM AVAILABLE TO ANY RETAIL INVESTOR IN THE EEA MAY BE UNLAWFUL UNDER THE PRIIPS REGULATION.

THIS PROSPECTUS IS NOT A PROSPECTUS FOR PURPOSES OF THE PROSPECTUS REGULATION. THIS PROSPECTUS HAS BEEN PREPARED ON THE BASIS THAT ANY OFFER OF SECURITIZED UTILITY TARIFF BONDS IN ANY MEMBER STATE OF THE EEA (EACH, A RELEVANT STATE”) WILL BE MADE ONLY PURSUANT TO AN EXEMPTION UNDER THE PROSPECTUS REGULATION FROM THE REQUIREMENT TO PUBLISH A PROSPECTUS FOR OFFERS OF SECURITIZED UTILITY TARIFF BONDS. ACCORDINGLY ANY PERSON MAKING OR INTENDING TO MAKE AN OFFER IN THAT RELEVANT STATE OF SECURITIZED UTILITY TARIFF BONDS WHICH ARE THE SUBJECT OF THE OFFERING CONTEMPLATED IN THIS PROSPECTUS MAY ONLY DO SO IN CIRCUMSTANCES IN WHICH NO OBLIGATION ARISES FOR THE ISSUING ENTITY OR ANY OF THE UNDERWRITERS TO PUBLISH A PROSPECTUS PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 3 OF THE PROSPECTUS REGULATION, IN RELATION TO SUCH OFFER. NEITHER THE ISSUING ENTITY NOR ANY UNDERWRITER HAVE AUTHORISED, NOR WILL THEY AUTHORISE, THE MAKING OF ANY OFFER OF SECURITIZED UTILITY TARIFF BONDS IN CIRCUMSTANCES IN WHICH AN OBLIGATION ARISES FOR THE ISSUING ENTITY OR ANY OF THE UNDERWRITERS TO PUBLISH A PROSPECTUS FOR SUCH OFFER.

ACCORDINGLY, ANY PERSON MAKING OR INTENDING TO MAKE AN OFFER IN THAT RELEVANT MEMBER STATE OF SECURITIZED UTILITY TARIFF BONDS WHICH ARE THE SUBJECT OF THE OFFERING CONTEMPLATED IN THIS PROSPECTUS MAY DO SO ONLY WITH RESPECT TO QUALIFIED INVESTORS. NEITHER WE NOR ANY UNDERWRITER HAS AUTHORIZED, NOR DO WE OR THEY AUTHORIZE, THE MAKING OF ANY OFFER OF SECURITIZED UTILITY TARIFF BONDS OTHER THAN TO QUALIFIED INVESTORS.

ANY DISTRIBUTOR SUBJECT TO MIFID II THAT IS OFFERING, SELLING OR RECOMMENDING THE SECURITIZED UTILITY TARIFF BONDS IS RESPONSIBLE FOR UNDERTAKING ITS OWN TARGET MARKET ASSESSMENT IN RESPECT OF THE SECURITIZED UTILITY TARIFF BONDS AND DETERMINING ITS OWN DISTRIBUTION CHANNELS FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE MIFID II PRODUCT GOVERNANCE RULES UNDER COMMISSION DELEGATED DIRECTIVE (EU) 2017/593 (AS AMENDED, THE DELEGATED DIRECTIVE”). NONE OF EVERGY MISSOURI WEST, THE ISSUING ENTITY OR ANY OF THE UNDERWRITERS MAKES ANY REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES AS TO A DISTRIBUTOR’S COMPLIANCE WITH THE DELEGATED DIRECTIVE.

EACH UNDERWRITER HAS REPRESENTED AND AGREED THAT IT HAS NOT OFFERED, SOLD OR OTHERWISE MADE AVAILABLE, AND WILL NOT OFFER, SELL OR OTHERWISE MAKE

 

130


Table of Contents

AVAILABLE, ANY SECURITIZED UTILITY TARIFF BONDS WHICH ARE THE SUBJECT OF THE OFFERING CONTEMPLATED BY THIS PROSPECTUS TO ANY RETAIL INVESTOR (AS DEFINED ABOVE) IN THE EEA. FOR THIS PURPOSE, THE EXPRESSION OFFER INCLUDES THE COMMUNICATION IN ANY FORM AND BY ANY MEANS OF SUFFICIENT INFORMATION ON THE TERMS OF THE OFFER AND THE SECURITIZED UTILITY TARIFF BONDS SO AS TO ENABLE AN INVESTOR TO DECIDE TO PURCHASE OR SUBSCRIBE FOR THE SECURITIZED UTILITY TARIFF BONDS.

NOTICE TO RESIDENTS OF UNITED KINGDOM

THE SECURITIZED UTILITY TARIFF BONDS ARE NOT INTENDED TO BE OFFERED, SOLD OR OTHERWISE MADE AVAILABLE TO AND SHOULD NOT BE OFFERED, SOLD OR OTHERWISE MADE AVAILABLE TO ANY RETAIL INVESTOR IN THE UNITED KINGDOM (UK”). FOR THESE PURPOSES OF THIS PROVISION:

 

  (A)

THE EXPRESSION “RETAIL INVESTOR” MEANS A PERSON WHO IS ONE (OR MORE) OF THE FOLLOWING:

 

  (I)

A RETAIL CLIENT AS DEFINED IN POINT (8) OF ARTICLE 2 OF REGULATION (EU) NO 2017/565 AS AMENDED BY ARTICLE 39(3) OF THE MARKETS IN FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (AMENDMENT) (EU EXIT) REGULATIONS 2018 AND AS IT FORMS PART OF DOMESTIC LAW BY VIRTUE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION (WITHDRAWAL) ACT 2018 (EUWA”); OR

 

  (II)

A CUSTOMER WITHIN THE MEANING OF THE PROVISIONS OF THE FINANCIAL SERVICES AND MARKETS ACT 2000 (AS AMENDED, THE FSMA) OF THE UNITED KINGDOM AND ANY RULES OR REGULATIONS MADE UNDER THE FSMA TO IMPLEMENT DIRECTIVE (EU) 2016/97, WHERE THAT CUSTOMER WOULD NOT QUALIFY AS A PROFESSIONAL CLIENT, AS DEFINED IN POINT (8) OF ARTICLE 2(1) OF REGULATION (EU) NO 600/2014 AS IT FORMS PART OF DOMESTIC LAW BY VIRTUE OF THE EUWA; OR

 

  (III)

NOT A QUALIFIED INVESTOR AS DEFINED IN ARTICLE 2 OF THE PROSPECTUS REGULATION AS IT FORMS PART OF DOMESTIC LAW BY VIRTUE OF THE EUWA (THE UK PROSPECTUS REGULATION”); AND

 

  (B)

THE EXPRESSION “OFFER” INCLUDES THE COMMUNICATION IN ANY FORM AND BY ANY MEANS OF SUFFICIENT INFORMATION ON THE TERMS OF THE OFFER AND THE SECURITIZED UTILITY TARIFF BONDS TO BE OFFERED SO AS TO ENABLE AN INVESTOR TO DECIDE TO PURCHASE OR SUBSCRIBE FOR THE SECURITIZED UTILITY TARIFF BONDS.

CONSEQUENTLY NO KEY INFORMATION DOCUMENT REQUIRED BY REGULATION (EU) NO 1286/2014 AS IT FORMS PART OF DOMESTIC LAW BY VIRTUE OF THE EUWA, AS AMENDED (THE UK PRIIPS REGULATION”) FOR OFFERING OR SELLING THE SECURITIZED UTILITY TARIFF BONDS OR OTHERWISE MAKING THEM AVAILABLE TO RETAIL INVESTORS IN THE UK HAS BEEN PREPARED AND THEREFORE OFFERING OR SELLING THE SECURITIZED UTILITY TARIFF BONDS OR OTHERWISE MAKING THEM AVAILABLE TO ANY RETAIL INVESTOR IN THE UK MAY BE UNLAWFUL UNDER THE UK PRIIPS REGULATION.

THIS PROSPECTUS HAS BEEN PREPARED ON THE BASIS THAT ANY OFFER OF SECURITIZED UTILITY TARIFF BONDS IN THE UK WILL BE MADE PURSUANT TO AN EXEMPTION UNDER THE UK PROSPECTUS REGULATION FROM THE REQUIREMENT TO PUBLISH A PROSPECTUS FOR OFFERS OF SECURITIZED UTILITY TARIFF BONDS. THIS IS NOT A PROSPECTUS FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE UK PROSPECTUS REGULATION.

THIS PROSPECTUS AND ANY OTHER MATERIAL IN RELATION TO THE SECURITIZED UTILITY TARIFF BONDS IS ONLY BEING DISTRIBUTED TO, AND IS DIRECTED ONLY AT, PERSONS IN THE UK WHO ARE “QUALIFIED INVESTORS” (AS DEFINED IN THE UK PROSPECTUS REGULATION) WHO ARE ALSO (I) INVESTMENT PROFESSIONALS FALLING WITHIN ARTICLE 19(5) OF THE FINANCIAL SERVICES AND MARKETS ACT 2000 (FINANCIAL PROMOTION) ORDER 2005 (AS AMENDED, THE

 

131


Table of Contents

ORDER”), OR (II) HIGH NET WORTH ENTITIES OR OTHER PERSONS FALLING WITHIN ARTICLES 49(2)(A) TO (D) OF THE ORDER, OR (III) PERSONS TO WHOM IT WOULD OTHERWISE BE LAWFUL TO DISTRIBUTE IT, ALL SUCH PERSONS TOGETHER BEING REFERRED TO AS RELEVANT PERSONS”. THE SECURITIZED UTILITY TARIFF BONDS ARE ONLY AVAILABLE TO, AND ANY INVITATION, OFFER OR AGREEMENT TO SUBSCRIBE, PURCHASE OR OTHERWISE ACQUIRE SUCH SECURITIZED UTILITY TARIFF BONDS WILL BE ENGAGED IN ONLY WITH, RELEVANT PERSONS. ANY PERSON IN THE UK THAT IS NOT A RELEVANT PERSON SHOULD NOT ACT OR RELY ON THIS PROSPECTUS OR ITS CONTENTS. THE SECURITIZED UTILITY TARIFF BONDS ARE NOT BEING OFFERED TO THE PUBLIC IN THE UK.

ANY DISTRIBUTOR SUBJECT TO THE FCA HANDBOOK PRODUCT INTERVENTION AND PRODUCT GOVERNANCE SOURCEBOOK (THE UK MIFIR PRODUCT GOVERNANCE RULES”) IS RESPONSIBLE FOR UNDERTAKING ITS OWN TARGET MARKET ASSESSMENT IN RESPECT OF THE SECURITIZED UTILITY TARIFF BONDS AND DETERMINING APPROPRIATE DISTRIBUTION CHANNELS. NONE OF THE ISSUING ENTITY, EVERGY MISSOURI WEST OR ANY OF THE UNDERWRITERS MAKES ANY REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES AS TO A DISTRIBUTOR’S COMPLIANCE WITH THE UK MIFIR PRODUCT GOVERNANCE RULES.

IN ADDITION, IN THE UK, EACH UNDERWRITER HAS REPRESENTED AND AGREED IN THE UNDERWRITING AGREEMENT THAT THE SECURITIZED UTILITY TARIFF BONDS MAY NOT BE OFFERED OTHER THAN BY AN UNDERWRITER THAT:

 

   

HAS ONLY COMMUNICATED OR CAUSED TO BE COMMUNICATED AND WILL ONLY COMMUNICATE OR CAUSE TO BE COMMUNICATED AN INVITATION OR INDUCEMENT TO ENGAGE IN INVESTMENT ACTIVITY (WITHIN THE MEANING OF SECTION 21 OF THE FSMA) RECEIVED BY IT IN CONNECTION WITH THE ISSUE OR SALE OF THE SECURITIZED UTILITY TARIFF BONDS IN CIRCUMSTANCES IN WHICH SECTION 21(1) OF THE FSMA DOES NOT APPLY TO US; AND

 

   

HAS COMPLIED AND WILL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE FSMA WITH RESPECT TO ANYTHING DONE BY IT IN RELATION TO THE SECURITIZED UTILITY TARIFF BONDS IN, FROM OR OTHERWISE INVOLVING THE UK.

NOTICE TO RESIDENTS OF CANADA

THE SECURITIZED UTILITY TARIFF BONDS MAY BE SOLD IN THE PROVINCES OF ALBERTA, BRITISH COLUMBIA AND ONTARIO ONLY TO PURCHASERS PURCHASING, OR DEEMED TO BE PURCHASING, AS PRINCIPAL THAT ARE ACCREDITED INVESTORS, AS DEFINED IN NATIONAL INSTRUMENT 45-106 PROSPECTUS EXEMPTIONS OR SUBSECTION 73.3(1) OF THE SECURITIES ACT (ONTARIO), AND ARE PERMITTED CLIENTS, AS DEFINED IN NATIONAL INSTRUMENT 31-103 REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS, EXEMPTIONS AND ONGOING REGISTRANT OBLIGATIONS. ANY RESALE OF THE SECURITIZED UTILITY TARIFF BONDS MUST BE MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH AN EXEMPTION FROM, OR IN A TRANSACTION NOT SUBJECT TO, THE PROSPECTUS REQUIREMENTS OF APPLICABLE SECURITIES LAWS.

SECURITIES LEGISLATION IN CERTAIN PROVINCES OR TERRITORIES OF CANADA MAY PROVIDE A PURCHASER WITH REMEDIES FOR RESCISSION OR DAMAGES IF THIS PROSPECTUS (INCLUDING ANY AMENDMENT THERETO) CONTAINS A MISREPRESENTATION, PROVIDED THAT THE REMEDIES FOR RESCISSION OR DAMAGES ARE EXERCISED BY THE PURCHASER WITHIN THE TIME LIMIT PRESCRIBED BY THE SECURITIES LEGISLATION OF THE PURCHASER’S PROVINCE OR TERRITORY. THE PURCHASER SHOULD REFER TO ANY APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE SECURITIES LEGISLATION OF THE PURCHASER’S PROVINCE OR TERRITORY FOR PARTICULARS OF THESE RIGHTS OR CONSULT WITH A LEGAL ADVISOR.

PURSUANT TO SECTION 3A.3 OF NATIONAL INSTRUMENT 33-105 UNDERWRITING CONFLICTS (NI 33-105”), THE UNDERWRITERS ARE NOT REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS OF NI 33-105 REGARDING UNDERWRITER CONFLICTS OF INTEREST IN CONNECTION WITH THIS OFFERING.

 

132


Table of Contents

GLOSSARY OF DEFINED TERMS

Set forth below is a list of the defined terms used in this prospectus:

Actual securitized utility tariff charge collections means, if no servicer default has occurred and is continuing, the calculation of the collections of the estimated securitized utility tariff charge collections, with regard to ADO; provided, that if a servicer default has occurred and is continuing, a calculation of the collections of the securitized utility tariff charges by the Servicer, without regard to ADO.

Additional securitized utility tariff bonds means additional “securitized utility tariff bonds” (as defined in the Securitization Law) issued pursuant to a financing order, to recover additional securitized utility tariff costs that are eligible to be financed under the Securitization Law.

Administration agreement means the administration agreement to be entered into between the issuing entity and Evergy Missouri West, as the same may be amended and supplemented from time to time.

Administrator means Evergy Missouri West, as administrator under the administration agreement, or any successor Administrator to the extent permitted under the administration agreement.

Affiliate means, with respect to any specified person, any other person controlling or controlled by or under common control with such specified person. For the purposes of this definition, “control when used with respect to any specified Person means the power to direct the management and policies of such person, directly or indirectly, whether through the ownership of voting securities, by contract or otherwise; and the terms “controlling and “controlled have meanings correlative to the foregoing.

Authorized Amount has the meaning specified under “Evergy Missouri West’s Financing Order” in this prospectus.

Bankruptcy Code means Title 11 of the United States Code, as amended.

Basic documents means the indenture, the administration agreement, the sale agreement, the issuing entity’s certificate of formation, the limited liability company agreement, the servicing agreement, the series supplement, the intercreditor agreement, any underwriting agreement and all other documents and certificates delivered in connection therewith.

Bondholder or “holder means any holder of the securitized utility tariff bonds offered pursuant to this prospectus.

Business day means any day other than a Saturday, a Sunday or a day on which banking institutions in Kansas City, Missouri or New York, New York are, or DTC or the corporate trust office of the trustee is, authorized or obligated by law, regulation or executive order to remain closed.

Capital contribution means the amount of cash contributed to the issuing entity by Evergy Missouri West as specified in the limited liability company agreement.

Capital subaccount means the capital subaccount, a subaccount of the collection account created by the indenture and held by the trustee under the indenture.

Certificate of formation means the issuing entity’s certificate of formation filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on November 21, 2022.

Clearstream means Clearstream Banking, Luxembourg, S.A.

Collateral means all of the issuing entity’s assets pledged to the trustee for the benefit of the holders of the securitized utility tariff bonds specified in the series supplement, which includes the securitized utility tariff property, all rights of the issuing entity under the sale agreement, the servicing agreement and the other documents entered into in connection with the securitized utility tariff bonds, all rights to the collection account and the subaccounts of the collection account, and all other property of the issuing entity relating to the securitized utility tariff bonds, except amounts deposited with the issuing entity on the closing date required for payment of costs of issuance of the securitized utility tariff bonds.

 

133


Table of Contents

Collection account means the segregated trust account relating to the securitized utility tariff bonds designated the collection account and held by the trustee under the indenture.

Commission regulations means the regulations, including proposed or temporary regulations, promulgated under the Revised Statutes of Missouri.

COVID-19 means the novel coronavirus which has caused the ongoing global pandemic.

Customer means “customer” within the meaning of the Securitization Law, and means any existing or future retail customer receiving electrical service from Evergy Missouri West, or its successor or assignees under MPSC approved rate schedules except for Exempted Customers even if such retail customer elects to purchase electricity from an alternative electricity supplier following a fundamental change in regulation of public utilities in Missouri.

Depositor means Evergy Missouri West.

DTC means the Depository Trust Company, New York, New York, and its nominee holder, Cede & Co.

Eligible institution means (a) the corporate trust department of the trustee, so long as any of the securities of the trustee have (i) either a short-term credit rating from Moody’s of at least “P-1” or a long-term unsecured debt rating from Moody’s of at least “A2” and (ii) a credit rating from S&P of at least “A”; or (b) a depository institution organized under the laws of the United States of America or any state (or any domestic branch of a foreign bank) (i) that has either (A) a long-term issuer rating of “AA-” or higher by S&P and “A2” or higher by Moody’s, or (B) a short-term issuer rating of “A-1” or higher by S&P and “P1” or higher by Moody’s, or any other long-term, short-term or certificate of deposit rating acceptable to the rating agencies, and (ii) whose deposits are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

Eligible investments mean instruments or investment property which evidence:

 

  (a)

direct obligations of, or obligations fully and unconditionally guaranteed as to timely payment by, the United States of America;

 

  (b)

demand or time deposits of, unsecured certificates of deposit of, money market deposit accounts of or bankers’ acceptances issued by, any depository institution (including the trustee, acting in its commercial capacity) incorporated or organized under the laws of the United States of America or any state thereof and subject to the supervision and examination by U.S. federal or state banking authorities, so long as the commercial paper or other short-term debt obligations of such depository institution are, at the time of deposit, rated at least “A-1” and “P-1” or their equivalents by each of S&P and Moody’s, or such lower rating as will not result in the downgrading or withdrawal of the securitized utility tariff bonds;

 

  (c)

commercial paper (including commercial paper of the trustee, acting in its commercial capacity, and other than commercial paper issued by Evergy Missouri West or any of its affiliates) having, at the time of investment or contractual commitment to invest, a rating of at least “A-1” and “P-1” or their equivalents by each of S&P and Moody’s and Fitch or such lower rating as will not result in the downgrading or withdrawal of the ratings of the securitized utility tariff bonds;

 

  (d)

investments in money market funds which have a rating in the highest investment category granted thereby (including funds for which the trustee or any of its affiliates is investment manager or advisor) from Moody’s and S&P;

 

  (e)

repurchase obligations with respect to any security that is a direct obligation of, or fully guaranteed by, the United States of America or certain of its agencies or instrumentalities, entered into with eligible institutions; or

 

134


Table of Contents
  (f)

repurchase obligations with respect to any security or whole loan entered into with an eligible institution or with a registered broker-dealer acting as principal and that meets certain ratings criteria.

ERISA means the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended.

Estimated securitized utility tariff charge collections means the payments in respect of securitized utility tariff charges which are deemed to have been received by the servicer, directly or indirectly, from or on behalf of customers, calculated in accordance with the servicing agreement.

Euroclear means the Euroclear System.

Evergy Missouri West means Evergy Missouri West, Inc., a Delaware corporation.

Evergy means Evergy, Inc., a Missouri corporation.

Excess funds subaccount means that subaccount of the collection account into which funds collected by the servicer in excess of amounts necessary to make the payments specified on a given payment date.

Exchange Act means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

Exempted Customers means any customer receiving electrical service under special contracts as of August 28, 2021.

Expected sinking fund schedule means, with respect to any tranche of the securitized utility tariff bonds, the expected sinking fund schedule related thereto set forth in the series supplement.

Final maturity date means, with respect to each tranche of securitized utility tariff bonds, the final maturity date therefor as specified in the series supplement.

Financing costs means principal and interest on the securitized utility tariff bonds, costs relating to the issuance of the securitized utility tariff bonds and ongoing financing costs.

Financing order means, unless the context indicates otherwise, the irrevocable amended report and order issued by the MPSC, File No. EF-2022-0155, on November 17, 2022, which became effective on November 27, 2022.

General subaccount means the general subaccount, a subaccount of the collection account created by the indenture and held by the trustee under the indenture.

Holder or “Bondholder” means a registered holder of the securitized utility tariff bonds.

Hunton means Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP, counsel to Evergy Missouri West and the issuing entity.

Indenture means the indenture to be entered into between the issuing entity and the trustee, providing for the issuance of securitized utility tariff bonds, as the same may be amended and supplemented from time to time.

Independent manager means each person appointed as an “independent manager” of the issuing entity pursuant to the limited liability company agreement.

Independent manager fee means the fee payable to the independent manager pursuant to the limited liability company agreement.

Internal Revenue Code means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

Issuing entity means Evergy Missouri West Storm Funding I, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company.

kW means kilowatt.

kWh means kilowatt-hour.

Limited liability company agreement means the Limited Liability Company Agreement of Evergy Missouri West Storm Funding I, LLC, dated as of November 21, 2022.

 

135


Table of Contents

LPC means any late payment charge that is or is permitted to be charged to customers by Evergy Missouri West.

Moody’s means Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. or any successor in interest. References to Moody’s are effective so long as Moody’s is a rating agency.

MPSC means the Missouri Public Service Commission.

Municipal DL has the meaning specified under “Risk Factors—Risks Associated with Potential Judicial, Legislative or Regulatory Decisions—A municipal entity might assert the right to acquire portions of Evergy Missouri West’s electric facilities and/or serve the load of customers within their jurisdictional areas and avoid or reduce the affected customers’ payment of the securitized utility tariff charges” in this prospectus.

MW means megawatt.

MWh means megawatt-hour.

Non-bypassable means that the right to collect these securitized utility tariff charges from all existing or future retail customers receiving electrical service from the Evergy Missouri West or its successors or assignees and located in Evergy Missouri West’s service area as such service area existed on the date of the financing order under MPSC-approved rate schedules, except for customers receiving electrical service under special contracts as of August 28, 2021, even if a retail customer elects to purchase electricity from an alternative electricity supplier following a fundamental change in regulation of public utilities in the State of Missouri.

Non-U.S. Holder means a holder of securitized utility tariff bonds that is neither a U.S. Holder nor subject to rules applicable to former citizens and residents of the United States.

NRSRO means a nationally recognized statistical rating organization.

Ongoing financing costs means all unreimbursed fees, costs and expenses incurred by or on behalf of the issuing entity, including all amounts owed by the issuing entity to the trustee, any manager of the issuing entity, the servicing fee, the administration fee, legal and accounting fees, rating agency fees, costs and expenses of the issuing entity and Evergy Missouri West, the return on equity due Evergy Missouri West for its capital contribution and any franchise taxes owed on investment income in the collection account.

Outstanding means, as of the date of determination, all securitized utility tariff bonds theretofore authenticated and delivered under the Indenture except:

 

  (a)

securitized utility tariff bonds theretofore canceled by the securitized utility tariff bond registrar or delivered to the securitized utility tariff bond registrar for cancellation;

 

  (b)

securitized utility tariff bonds or portions thereof the payment for which money in the necessary amount has been theretofore deposited with the trustee or any paying agent in trust for the holders of such securitized utility tariff bonds; and

 

  (c)

securitized utility tariff bonds in exchange for or in lieu of other securitized utility tariff bonds which have been issued pursuant to this Indenture unless proof satisfactory to the trustee is presented that any such securitized utility tariff bonds are held by a protected purchaser (as defined in Section 8-303 of the UCC);

provided, that in determining whether the holders of the requisite outstanding amount of the securitized utility tariff bonds or any tranche thereof have given any request, demand, authorization, direction, notice, consent or waiver hereunder or under any basic document, securitized utility tariff bonds owned by the issuing entity, any other obligor upon the securitized utility tariff bonds, the member, the seller, the servicer or any affiliate of any of the foregoing persons shall be disregarded and deemed not to be outstanding, except that, in determining whether the trustee shall be protected in relying upon any such request, demand, authorization, direction, notice, consent or waiver, only securitized utility tariff bonds that the trustee actually knows to be so owned shall be so disregarded. Securitized utility tariff bonds so owned that have been pledged in good faith may be regarded as outstanding if the pledgee establishes to the satisfaction of the trustee the pledgee’s right so to act with respect to such securitized utility tariff bonds and that the pledgee is not the issuing entity, any other obligor upon the securitized utility tariff bonds, the member, the seller, the servicer or any affiliate of any of the foregoing persons.

 

136


Table of Contents

Outstanding amount means the aggregate principal amount of all securitized utility tariff bonds or, if the context requires, all securitized utility tariff bonds of a tranche, outstanding at the date of determination.

Payment date means the date or dates on which interest and principal are to be payable on the securitized utility tariff bonds.

Periodic payment requirement means the amount necessary to provide for the timely payment of scheduled principal of and interest on the securitized utility tariff bonds and financing costs payable in connection with the securitized utility tariff bonds.

PTCE means a prohibited transaction class exemption of the United States Department of Labor.

Rating agencies means Moody’s and S&P. If no such organization (or successor) is any longer in existence, “rating agency” shall be a NRSRO or other comparable person designated by the issuing entity, notice of which designation shall be given to the trustee and the servicer.

Rating agency condition means, with respect to any action, not less than ten (10) business days’ prior written notification to each rating agency of such action, and written confirmation from each of S&P and Moody’s to the servicer, the trustee and the issuing entity that such action will not result in a suspension, reduction or withdrawal of the then current rating by such rating agency of any tranche of securitized utility tariff bonds issued by the issuing entity and that prior to the taking of the proposed action no other rating agency shall have provided written notice to the issuing entity that such action has resulted or would result in the suspension, reduction or withdrawal of the then current rating of any such tranche of securitized utility tariff bonds; provided, that if within such ten (10) business day period, any rating agency (other than S&P) has neither replied to such notification nor responded in a manner that indicates that such rating agency is reviewing and considering the notification, then (i) the issuing entity shall be required to confirm that such rating agency has received the rating agency condition request, and if it has, promptly request the related rating agency condition confirmation and (ii) if the rating agency neither replies to such notification nor responds in a manner that indicates it is reviewing and considering the notification within five (5) business days following such second (2nd) request, the applicable rating agency condition requirement shall not be deemed to apply to such rating agency. For the purposes of this definition, any confirmation, request, acknowledgment or approval that is required to be in writing may be in the form of electronic mail or a press release (which may contain a general waiver of a rating agency’s right to review or consent).

Reconciliation certificate means the certificate of the servicer delivered to the trustee pursuant to the servicing agreement reconciling amounts securitized utility tariff charge collections delivered to the trustee for deposit to the collection account with actual securitized utility tariff charge collections.

Record date means the date or dates with respect to each payment date on which it is determined the person in whose name each securitized utility tariff bond is registered will be paid on the respective payment date.

Recovery costs means all “Securitized utility tariff costs” as defined in the Securitization Law.

Securitized utility tariff property means all “Securitized utility tariff property” as defined in the Securitization Law created pursuant to the financing order and sold or otherwise conveyed to the issuing entity under the sale agreement, including the right to impose, collect and receive the securitized utility tariff charges authorized in the financing order.

Regulation AB means the rules of the SEC promulgated under Subpart 229.1100—Asset-Backed Securities (Regulation AB), 17 C.F.R. §§229.1100-229.1125, as such may be amended from time to time.

Regulation RR means Rule 19(b)(8) of the risk retention regulations in 17 C.F.R. Part 246 promulgated under the Exchange Act.

 

137


Table of Contents

Required capital level means the amount required to be funded in the capital subaccount, which will equal 0.50% of the initial aggregate principal amount of securitized utility tariff bonds issued by the issuing entity.

S&P means S&P Global Ratings, a division of S&P Global, Inc. or any successor in interest. References to S&P are effective so long as S&P is a rating agency.

Sale agreement means the sale agreement to be entered into between the issuing entity and Evergy Missouri West, pursuant to which Evergy Missouri West sells and the issuing entity buys the securitized utility tariff property.

Securitization Law means Section 393.1700 of the Revised Statutes of Missouri.

Securitized utility tariff bonds means, unless the context requires otherwise, the securitized utility tariff bonds offered pursuant to this prospectus.

Securitized utility tariff charges means the securitized utility tariff charges authorized by the financing order.

Securitized utility tariff charge collections means securitized utility tariff charges revenues received by the servicer to be remitted to the collection account.

Seller means Evergy Missouri West.

Series supplement means the supplement to the indenture which establishes the specific terms of the securitized utility tariff bonds.

Servicer means Evergy Missouri West, acting as the servicer, and any successor or assignee servicer, which will service the securitized utility tariff property under a servicing agreement with the issuing entity.

Servicer default has the meaning specified under “The Servicing Agreement—Servicer Defaults” in this prospectus.

Servicing agreement means the servicing agreement to be entered into between the issuing entity and Evergy Missouri West, as the same may be amended and supplemented from time to time, pursuant to which Evergy Missouri West undertakes to service the securitized utility tariff property.

Special payment date has the meaning specified under “Description of the Securitized Utility Tariff Bonds—Payments on the Securitized Utility Tariff Bonds” in this prospectus.

Sponsor means Evergy Missouri West.

Standard true-up adjustments has the meaning specified under “Evergy Missouri West Financing Order—Securitized Utility Tariff Charges—The Financing Order Requires the Servicer to Periodically ‘True-Up’ the Securitized Utility Tariff Charge” in this prospectus.

State Pledge has the meaning specified under “Prospectus Summary of Terms—State Pledge” in this prospectus.

Treasury Regulations means proposed or issued regulations promulgated from time to time under the Internal Revenue Code.

True-up means a mechanism required by the Securitization Law and the financing order whereby the servicer will apply to the MPSC for adjustments to the applicable securitized utility tariff charges based on actual collected securitized utility tariff charges and updated assumptions by the servicer as to future collections of securitized utility tariff charges.

Trust Indenture Act” means the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, as amended.

Trustee means The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, National Association, as trustee under the indenture, and its successors and assigns in such capacity.

 

138


Table of Contents

UCC means, unless the context otherwise requires, the Uniform Commercial Code, as in effect in the relevant jurisdiction, as amended from time to time.

U.S. Holder means a holder of a securitized utility tariff bond that is (a) a citizen or resident of the United States, (b) a partnership or corporation (or other entity treated like a corporation for federal income tax purposes) organized in or under the laws of the United States, any state thereof or the District of Columbia, (c) an estate the income of which is includible in gross income for U.S. federal income tax purposes regardless of its source, (d) a trust with respect to which both (i) a court in the United States is able to exercise primary authority over its administration and (ii) one or more United States persons have the authority to control all of its substantial decisions or (e) a trust that has elected to be treated as a United States person under applicable Treasury Regulations.

 

139


Table of Contents

 

 

$             Securitized Utility Tariff Bonds, Series 2023-A

 

 

Evergy Missouri West, Inc.

Sponsor, Depositor and Initial Servicer

Evergy Missouri West Storm Funding I, LLC

Issuing Entity

 

 

Joint Book-Running Managers

 

 

Through and including,                , 2023 (the 90th day after the date of this prospectus), all dealers that effect transactions in these securities, whether or not participating in this offering, may be required to deliver a prospectus. This is in addition to a dealer’s obligation to deliver a prospectus when acting as an underwriter and when offering an unsold allotment or subscription.

 

 

 


Table of Contents

PART II

Information Not Required in Prospectus

Item 12. Other Expenses of Issuance and Distribution

The following table sets forth the various expenses expected to be incurred by the registrant in connection with the issuance and distribution of the securities being registered by this prospectus, other than underwriting discounts and commissions. All amounts are estimated.

 

Securities and Exchange Commission registration fee

   $      

Printing expenses

         

Trustee fees and expenses

         

Legal fees and expenses

         

Accounting fees and expenses

         

Rating Agencies’ fees and expenses

         

Structuring agent fees and expenses

         

Miscellaneous fees and expenses

         

Total

   $      

 

*

To be filed by amendment.

Item 13. Indemnification of Directors and Officers

Evergy Missouri West Storm Funding I, LLC

Section 18-108 of the Delaware Limited Liability Company Act provides that subject to such standards and restrictions, if any, as are set forth in the limited liability company agreement of a limited liability company, a limited liability company may, and shall have the power to, indemnify and hold harmless any member or manager or other person from and against any and all claims and demands whatsoever. Under the limited liability company agreement of Evergy Missouri West Storm Funding I, LLC, the issuing entity will indemnify its managers to the fullest extent permitted by law against any liability incurred with respect to their services as managers under the issuing entity’s limited liability company agreement, except for liabilities arising from their own fraud, gross negligence or willful misconduct or, in the case of an independent manager, their bad faith or willful misconduct.

Evergy Missouri West, Inc.

Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law (the “DGCL”) empowers a Delaware corporation to indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative (other than an action by or in the right of the corporation) by reason of the fact that such person is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of such corporation or is or was serving at the request of such corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise. The indemnity may include expenses (including attorneys’ fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by such person in connection with such action, suit or proceeding, provided that such person acted in good faith and in a manner such person reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation, and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe such person’s conduct was unlawful. A Delaware corporation may indemnify directors, officers, employees and other agents of such corporation in an action by or in the right of the corporation under the same conditions, except that no indemnification is permitted without judicial approval if the person to be indemnified has been adjudged to be liable to the corporation. Where a present or former director or officer of the corporation is successful on the merits or otherwise in the defense of any action, suit or proceeding referred to above or in defense of any claim, issue or matter therein, a Delaware corporation must indemnify such person against the expenses (including attorneys’ fees) which he or she actually and reasonably incurred in connection therewith.


Table of Contents

Evergy Missouri West’s certificate of incorporation, as amended and restated, and bylaws, as amended and restated, contain provisions that provide for indemnification of officers and directors to the fullest extent permitted by, and in the manner permissible under, applicable state and federal law, including the DGCL.

As permitted by Section 102(b)(7) of the DGCL, Evergy Missouri West’s certificate of incorporation, as amended and restated, contains a provision eliminating the personal liability of a director to Evergy Missouri West or its stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director, subject to certain exceptions.

Evergy Missouri West maintains policies insuring its officers and directors against certain civil liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act.

Evergy Missouri West has entered into indemnification agreements with each of its directors and certain of its officers and anticipates that it will enter into similar agreements with future officers and directors. Generally, these agreements attempt to provide the maximum protection permitted by Delaware law with respect to indemnification. The indemnification agreements provide that Evergy Missouri West will pay certain amounts incurred by its directors in connection with any civil, criminal, administrative or investigative action or proceeding. Such amounts include any expenses, including attorneys’ fees, judgments, civil or criminal fines, settlement amounts and other expenses customarily incurred in connection with legal proceedings.

The foregoing summaries are necessarily subject to the complete text of the statute, Evergy Missouri West’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws, the indemnification agreements and the arrangements referred to above and are qualified in their entirety by reference thereto.

Item 14. Exhibits

 

EXHIBIT
NO.

  

DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBIT

1.1    Form of Underwriting Agreement*
3.1    Certificate of Formation of Evergy Missouri West Storm Funding I, LLC**
3.2    Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of Evergy Missouri West Storm Funding I, LLC*
4.1    Form of Indenture for the issuance of Securitized Utility Tariff Bonds, Series 2023-A, between Evergy Missouri West Storm Funding I, LLC and the Trustee (including forms of the securitized utility tariff bonds)*
4.2    Form of Series Supplement for the issuance of Securitized Utility Tariff Bonds, Series 2023-A, between Evergy Missouri West Storm Funding I, LLC and the Trustee (included as part of Exhibit 4.1)*
5.1    Opinion of Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP with respect to legality*
8.1    Opinion of Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP with respect to federal tax matters*
10.1    Form of Securitized Utility Tariff Property Servicing Agreement between Evergy Missouri West Storm Funding I, LLC and Evergy Missouri West, Inc., as Servicer*
10.2    Form of Securitized Utility Tariff Property Purchase and Sale Agreement between Evergy Missouri West Storm Funding I, LLC and Evergy Missouri West, Inc., as Seller*
10.3    Form of Administration Agreement between Evergy Missouri West Storm Funding I, LLC and Evergy Missouri West, Inc., as Administrator*
21.1    List of Subsidiaries**
23.1    Consent of Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP (included as part of its Opinions filed as Exhibits 5.1 and 8.1)*
24.1    Power of Attorney of Evergy Missouri West, Inc. **
25.1    Form T-1 Statement of Eligibility under the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, as amended of The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, National Association for the form of Indenture for the issuance of Securitized Utility Tariff Bonds, Series 2023-A **


Table of Contents
99.1    Financing Order**
99.2    Form of Opinion of Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP with respect to U.S. and Missouri constitutional matters*
99.3    Consent of Independent Manager*
107.1    Filing Fee Table**

 

*

To be filed by amendment.

**

Filed herewith.

Item 15. Undertakings

 

  a)

The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes that:

 

  i.

For purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, the information omitted from the form of prospectus filed as part of this registration statement in reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in a form of prospectus filed by the registrant pursuant to Rule 424(b)(1) or (4) or 497(h) under the Securities Act of 1933 shall be deemed to be part of this registration statement as of the time it was declared effective.

 

  ii.

For the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each post-effective amendment that contains a form of prospectus shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.

 

  b)

As to indemnification:

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the registrants pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, each registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act of 1933 and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by a registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of such registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, each registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.

The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes that, for purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each filing of the annual report pursuant to section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 of a third party that is incorporated by reference in the registration statement in accordance with Item 1100(c)(1) of Regulation AB (17 CFR 229.1100(c)(1)) shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.

The undersigned registrants hereby undertake to file an application for the purpose of developing eligibility of the trustee to act under Subsection (a) of Section 310 of the Trust Indenture Act in accordance with the rules and regulations prescribed by the Securities and Exchange Commission under Section 305(b)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant certifies that it has reasonable grounds to believe that it meets all the requirements for filing on Form SF-1 and has duly caused this Registration Statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Kansas City, State of Missouri, on the 20th day of December, 2022.

 

EVERGY MISSOURI WEST, INC.
By:  

/s/ David A. Campbell

Name:   David A. Campbell
Title:   President and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the Registration Statement has been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

Signatures    Title    Date

/s/ David A. Campbell

  

President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

   December 20, 2022
David A. Campbell

/s/ Kirkland B. Andrews

Kirkland B. Andrews

   Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)    December 20, 2022

/s/ Steven P. Busser

   Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)    December 20, 2022
Steven P. Busser

Evergy Missouri West, Inc. Majority of Board of Directors:

 

/s/ Mark A. Ruelle

   Director
Chair of the Board
   December 20, 2022
*Mark A. Ruelle

/s/ David A. Campbell

   Director, President and
Chief Executive Officer
   December 20, 2022
* David A. Campbell

/s/ Thomas D. Hyde

   Director    December 20, 2022
*Thomas D. Hyde

/s/ B. Anthony Isaac

   Director    December 20, 2022
*B. Anthony Isaac

/s/ Paul M. Keglevic

   Director    December 20, 2022
*Paul M. Keglevic

/s/ Mary L. Landrieu

   Director    December 20, 2022
*Mary L. Landrieu

/s/ Sandra A.J. Lawrence

   Director    December 20, 2022
*Sandra A.J. Lawrence


Table of Contents

/s/ Ann D. Murtlow

   Director    December 20, 2022
*Ann D. Murtlow

/s/ Sandra J. Price

   Director    December 20, 2022
*Sandra J. Price

/s/ James Scarola

   Director    December 20, 2022
*James Scarola

/s/ S. Carl Soderstrom Jr.

   Director    December 20, 2022
*S. Carl Soderstrom Jr.

/s/ C. John Wilder

   Director    December 20, 2022
*C. John Wilder

 

* By:  

/s/ David A. Campbell

  David A. Campbell
  Attorney-in fact


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant certifies that it has reasonable grounds to believe that it meets all the requirements for filing on Form SF-1 and has duly caused this Registration Statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City Kansas City, State of Missouri, on the 20th day of December, 2022.

 

EVERGY MISSOURI WEST STORM FUNDING I, LLC
By:  

/s/ Geoffrey T. Ley

Name:   Geoffrey T. Ley
Title:   President

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the Registration Statement has been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

Signatures    Title    Date

/s/ Geoffrey T. Ley

   Manager and President
(Principal Executive Officer)
   December 20, 2022
Geoffrey T. Ley

/s/ Jason O. Humphrey

Jason O. Humphrey

   Manager, Secretary and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)
(Principal Accounting Officer)
   December 20, 2022

Exhibit 3.1

CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION

OF

EVERGY MISSOURI WEST STORM FUNDING I, LLC

This Certificate of Formation of Evergy Missouri West Storm Funding I, LLC (the “LLC”), dated as of November 21, 2022, has been duly executed and is being filed by the undersigned, as an authorized person, to form a limited liability company under the Delaware Limited Liability Company Act (6 Del. C. § 18-101, et seq.).

FIRST. The name of the limited liability company is Evergy Missouri West Storm Funding I, LLC.

SECOND. The address of the registered office of the LLC in the State of Delaware is c/o Corporation Service Company, 251 Little Falls Drive, Wilmington, County of New Castle, Delaware 19808.

THIRD. The name and address of the registered agent for service of process on the LLC in the State of Delaware are Corporation Service Company, 251 Little Falls Drive, Wilmington, County of New Castle, Delaware 19808.

[Signature Page Follows]


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate of Formation as of the date first above written.

 

/s/ Jason O. Humphrey

Name: Jason O. Humphrey
Authorized Person

Exhibit 21.1

Subsidiaries of Evergy Missouri West, Inc.

 

Name of Subsidiary

  

Jurisdiction of Formation of Subsidiary

MPS Merchant Services, Inc.    Delaware
MPS Gas Pipeline Corporation    Delaware
Evergy Missouri West Receivables Company    Delaware
MPS Canada Holdings, Inc.    Delaware
MPS Networks Canada Corporation    Alberta, Canada
MPS Canada Corporation    New Brunswick, Canada
Trans MPS, Inc.    Delaware
MPS Europe, Inc.    Delaware
MPS Sterling Holdings, LLC    Delaware

Exhibit 24.1

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:

That each one of the undersigned directors of Evergy Missouri West, Inc., a Delaware corporation, does hereby constitute and appoint David A. Campbell, Kirkland B. Andrews, and Heather A. Humphrey, his or her true and lawful attorney and agent, with full power and authority to execute in the name and on behalf of the undersigned as such director a Registration Statement on Form SF-1, and any amendments thereto, hereby granting unto such attorney and agent full power of substitution and revocation in the premises; and hereby ratifying and confirming all that such attorney and agent may do or cause to be done by virtue of these presents.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 9th day of December, 2022.

 

/s/ David A. Campbell

    

/s/ Thomas D. Hyde

David A. Campbell      Thomas D. Hyde

/s/ B. Anthony Isaac

    

/s/ Paul M. Keglevic

B. Anthony Isaac      Paul M. Keglevic

/s/ Mary L. Landrieu

    

/s/ Sandra A.J. Lawrence

Mary L. Landrieu      Sandra A.J. Lawrence

/s/ Ann D. Murtlow

    

/s/ Sandra J. Price

Ann D. Murtlow      Sandra J. Price

/s/ Mark A. Ruelle

    

/s/ James Scarola

Mark A. Ruelle      James Scarola

/s/ S. Carl Soderstrom Jr.

    

/s/ C. John Wilder

S. Carl Soderstrom Jr.      C. John Wilder

Exhibit 25.1

 

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

FORM T-1

 

 

STATEMENT OF ELIGIBILITY

UNDER THE TRUST INDENTURE ACT OF 1939

OF A CORPORATION DESIGNATED TO ACT AS TRUSTEE

 

CHECK IF AN APPLICATION TO DETERMINE ELIGIBILITY OF A TRUSTEE PURSUANT TO SECTION 305(b)(2)

 

 

THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A.

(Exact name of trustee as specified in its charter)

 

 

 

  95-3571558

(Jurisdiction of incorporation

if not a U.S. national bank)

 

(I.R.S. employer

identification no.)

333 South Hope Street Suite 2525

Los Angeles, California

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

90071

(Zip code)

 

 

EVERGY MISSOURI WEST STORM FUNDING I, LLC

(Exact name of obligor as specified in its charter)

 

 

 

Delaware   92-1105743

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. employer

identification no.)

818 S. Kansas Avenue

Topeka, Kansas

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

66612

(Zip code)

 

 

Securitized Utility Tariff Bonds, Series 2023-A

(Title of the indenture securities)

 

 

 


1.

General information. Furnish the following information as to the trustee:

 

  (a)

Name and address of each examining or supervising authority to which it is subject.

 

Name

  

Address

Comptroller of the Currency United States Department of the Treasury    Washington, DC 20219
Federal Reserve Bank    San Francisco, CA 94105
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation    Washington, DC 20429

 

  (b)

Whether it is authorized to exercise corporate trust powers.

Yes.

 

2.

Affiliations with Obligor.

If the obligor is an affiliate of the trustee, describe each such affiliation.

None.

 

16.

List of Exhibits.

Exhibits identified in parentheses below, on file with the Commission, are incorporated herein by reference as an exhibit hereto, pursuant to Rule 7a-29 under the Trust Indenture Act of 1939 (the “Act”).

 

  1.

A copy of the articles of association of The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., formerly known as The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A. (Exhibit 1 to Form T-1 filed with Registration Statement No. 333-121948 and Exhibit 1 to Form T-1 filed with Registration Statement No. 333-152875).

 

  2.

A copy of certificate of authority of the trustee to commence business. (Exhibit 2 to Form T-1 filed with Registration Statement No. 333-121948).

 

  3.

A copy of the authorization of the trustee to exercise corporate trust powers (Exhibit 3 to Form T-1 filed with Registration Statement No. 333-152875).

 

- 2 -


  4.

A copy of the existing by-laws of the trustee (Exhibit 4 to Form T-1 filed with Registration Statement No. 333-229762).

 

  6.

The consent of the trustee required by Section 321(b) of the Act (Exhibit 6 to Form T-1 filed with Registration Statement No. 333-152875).

 

  7.

A copy of the latest report of condition of the Trustee published pursuant to law or to the requirements of its supervising or examining authority.

 

- 3 -


SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Act, the trustee, The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., a banking association organized and existing under the laws of the United States of America, has duly caused this statement of eligibility to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, all in the City of Chicago, and State of Illinois, on the 9th day of December, 2022.

 

THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A.
By:  

/s/ Mitchell L. Brumwell

  Name:   Mitchell L. Brumwell
  Title:   Vice President

 

- 4 -


EXHIBIT 7

Consolidated Report of Condition of

THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A.

of 333 South Hope Street, Suite 2525, Los Angeles, CA 90071

At the close of business September 30, 2022, published in accordance with Federal regulatory authority instructions.

 

     Dollar amounts
in thousands
 

ASSETS

  

Cash and balances due from depository institutions:

  

Noninterest-bearing balances and currency and coin

     52,916  

Interest-bearing balances

     444,180  

Securities:

  

Held-to-maturity securities

     0  

Available-for-sale debt securities

     511  

Equity securities with readily determinable fair values not held for trading

     0  

Federal funds sold and securities

  

purchased under agreements to resell:

  

Federal funds sold in domestic offices

     0  

Securities purchased under agreements to resell

     0  

Loans and lease financing receivables:

  

Loans and leases held for sale

     0  

Loans and leases, held for investment

     0  

LESS: Allowance for loan and lease losses

     0  

Loans and leases held for investment, net of allowance

     0  

Trading assets

     0  

Premises and fixed assets (including capitalized leases)

     16,545  

Other real estate owned

     0  

Investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries and associated companies

     0  

Direct and indirect investments in real estate ventures

     0  

Intangible assets

     856,313  

Other assets

     116,850  
  

 

 

 

Total assets

   $ 1,487,315  
  

 

 

 

 

1


LIABILITIES

  

Deposits:

  

In domestic offices

     1,354  

Noninterest-bearing

     1,354  

Interest-bearing

     0  

Federal funds purchased and securities

  

sold under agreements to repurchase:

  

Federal funds purchased in domestic offices

     0  

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase

     0  

Trading liabilities

     0  

Other borrowed money:

  

(includes mortgage indebtedness and obligations under capitalized leases)

     0  

Not applicable

  

Not applicable

  

Subordinated notes and debentures

     0  

Other liabilities

     269,752  

Total liabilities

     271,106  

Not applicable

  

EQUITY CAPITAL

  

Perpetual preferred stock and related surplus

     0  

Common stock

     1,000  

Surplus (exclude all surplus related to preferred stock)

     325,202  

Not available

  

Retained earnings

     890,016  

Accumulated other comprehensive income

     -9  

Other equity capital components

     0  

Not available

  

Total bank equity capital

     1,216,209  

Noncontrolling (minority) interests in consolidated subsidiaries

     0  

Total equity capital

     1,216,209  
  

 

 

 

Total liabilities and equity capital

     1,487,315  
  

 

 

 

I, Matthew J. McNulty, CFO of the above-named bank do hereby declare that the Reports of Condition and Income (including the supporting schedules) for this report date have been prepared in conformance with the instructions issued by the appropriate Federal regulatory authority and are true to the best of my knowledge and belief.

Matthew J. McNulty        )          CFO

We, the undersigned directors (trustees), attest to the correctness of the Report of Condition (including the supporting schedules) for this report date and declare that it has been examined by us and to the best of our knowledge and belief has been prepared in conformance with the instructions issued by the appropriate Federal regulatory authority and is true and correct.

Antonio I. Portuondo, President             )

Michael P. Scott, Managing Director     )        Directors (Trustees)

Kevin P. Caffrey, Managing Director     )

 

2

Exhibit 99.1

BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI

 

LOGO

 

In the Matter of the Application of Evergy    )      
Missouri West, Inc. d/b/a Evergy Missouri West    )      
for a Financing Order Authorizing the    )    File No. EF-2022-0155   
Financing of Extraordinary Storm Costs    )      
Through an Issuance of Securitized Utility    )      
Tariff Bonds    )      

 

 

AMENDED REPORT AND ORDER

 

 

Issue Date: November 17, 2022      

Effective Date: November 27, 2022


TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

COUNSEL      5  
PROCEDURAL HISTORY      6  
DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIZATION      8  
CONTESTED ISSUES      11  

1)  WHAT AMOUNTS OF QUALIFIED EXTRAODINARY COSTS SHOULD THE COMMISSION AUTHORIZE EVERGY WEST TO FINANCE FOR WINTER STORM URI?

     12  

A)   WHAT AMOUNT OF COSTS, IF ANY, THAT EVERGY WEST IS SEEKING TO SECURITIZE WOULD EVERGY WEST RECOVER THROUGH CUSTOMARY RATEMAKING?

     16  

B)   WHAT IS THE APPROPRIATE METHOD OF CUSTOMARY RATEMAKING ABSENT SECURITIZATION

     16  

C)   UNDER RSMO 393.1700.2(2)(E), WHAT IS THE “CUSTOMARY METHOD OF FINANCING”? WHAT ARE THE COSTS THAT WOULD RESULT “FROM THE APPLICATION OF THE CUSTOMARY METHOD OF FINANCING AND REFLECTING THE QUALIFIED EXTRAORDINARY COSTS IN RETAIL CUSTOMER RATES”?

     16  

D)   WHAT IS THE APPROPORIATE ADJUSTMENT RELATED TO NON-FUEL OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE COSTS?

     16  

E)   SHOULD EVERGY WEST’S RECOVERY INCLUDE MORE THAN 95% OF FUEL AND PURCHASED POWER COSTS?

     25  

F) SHOULD EVERGY WEST’S RECOVERY THROUGH SECURITIZED BONDS REFLECT AN OFFSET BASED ON CERTAIN HIGHER THAN NORMAL CUSTOMER REVENUES RECEIVED BY EVERGY WEST DURING WINTER STORM URI?

     27  

G)   SHOULD EVERGY WEST’S RECOVERY REFLECT THROUGH SECURITIZED BONDS REFLECT A DISALLOWANCE BASED ON EVERGY WEST’S RESOURCE PLANNING?

     29  

 

2


H)   WHERE THE COSTS INCURRED BY EVERGY WEST RELATED TO WINTER STORM URI AS A RESULT OF ITS RESOURCE PLANNING PROCESS JUST AND REASONABLE?

     29  

I.   IF NO, SHOULD EVERGY WEST’S RECOVERY THROUGH SECURITIZED BONDS REFLECT A DISALLOWANCE?

  

II.   IF YES, WHAT AMOUNT SHOULD THE COMMISSION DISALLOW

  

I)  SHOULD EVERGY WEST’S RECOVERY THROUGH SECURITIZED BONDS REFLECT A DISALLOWANCE FOR INCOME TAX DEDUCTIONS FOR WINTER STORM URI COSTS?

     34  

J)  SHOULD EVERGY WEST’S RECOVERY THROUGH SECURITIZED BONDS REFLECT A DISALLOWANCE FOR THE INCOME TAX DEDUCTION ON THE CARRYING COSTS FOR WINTER STORM URI?

     34  

K)   WHAT ARE THE APPROPRIATE INTEREST RATE FOR CARRYING COSTS FOR WINTER STORM URI?

     40  

L)   WHAT IS THE APPROPRIATE ADJUSTMENT TO THE AMOUNT OF WINTER STORM URI COSTS TO BE RECOVERED THROUGH SECURITIZED BONDS, IF ANY, REGARDING EVERGY WEST’S ADMINISTRATION OF THE SPECIAL INCREMENTAL LOAD TARIFF?

     43  

M)  WHAT IS THE APPROPRIATE DISCOUNT RATE OR RATES TO USE IN CALCULATING THE NET PRESENT VALUE OF WINTER STORM URI COSTS THAT WOULD BE RECOVERED THROUGH CUSTOMARY RATEMAKING?

     48  

2)  WHAT ARE THE ESTIMATED UP-FRONT AND ONGOING FINANCING COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH SECURITIZING QUALIFIED EXTRAORDINARY COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH WINTER STORM URI?

     50  

A. WHAT IS THE APPROPRIATE RETURN ON INVESTMENT AND TREATMENT OF EARNING IN THE CAPITAL SUBACCOUNT?

     50  

B. IS THE ISSUANCE OF MULTIPLE SERIES APPROPRIATE?

     50  

3)  WOULD ISSUANCE OF SECURITIZED UTILITY TARIFF BONDS AND IMPOSITION OF SECURITIZED UTILITY TARIFF CHARGES PROVIDE QUANTIFIABLE NET PRESENT VALUE BENEFITS TO CUSTOMERS AS COMPARED TO RECOVERY OF THE SECURITIZED UTILITY TARIFF COSTS THAT WOULD BE INCURRED ABSENT THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS?

     55  

 

3


A)   WHAT IS THE APPROPRIATE DISCOUNT RATE TO USE TO CALCULATE NET PRESENT VALUE OF SECURITIZED UTILITY TARIFF COSTS THAT WOULD BE RECOVERED FOR WINTER STORM URI THROUGH SECURITIZATION?

     57  

B)   WHAT IS THE APPROPRIATE TERM AND COUPON RATE FOR SECURITIZATION OF EXTRAORDINARY COSTS RELATED TO WINTER STORM URI?

     58  

4)  HOW SHOULD SECURITIZED UTILITY TARIFF CHARGES BE ALLOCATED? .

     61  

5)  WHAT, IF ANY, ADDITIONS OR CHANGES SHOULD BE MADE TO THE STORM SECURITIZED UTILITY TARIFF RIDER PROPOSED BY EVERGY WEST?

     64  

6)  REGARDING ANY DESIGNATED STAFF REPRESENTATIVES WHO MAY BE ADVISED BY A FINANCIAL ADVISOR OR ADVISORS, WHAT PROVISION OR PROCEDURES SHOULD THE COMMISSION ORDER TO IMPLEMENT THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 393.1700.2(3)?

     66  

7)  WHAT OTHER CONDITIONS, IF ANY, ARE APPROPRIATE AND NOT INCONSISTENT WITH SECTION 393.1700 RSMO THAT SHOULD BE INCLUDED IN THE FINANCING ORDER?

     66  

8)  SHOULD THE COMMISSION GRANT A WAIVER UNDER SECTION 10(A)(1) OF THE AFFILIATE TRANSACTIONS RULE BETWEEN EVERGY WEST AND THE SPECIAL PURPOSE ENTITY?

     74  

NON-CONTESTED ISSUES

     76  

ORDERED PARAGRAPHS

     109  

 

4


COUNSEL

EVERGY MISSOURI WEST:

Karl Zobrist, Dentons, 4520 Main Street, Suite 1100, Kansas City, Missouri 64111.

James M Fischer, Fischer & Dority, P.C., 101 Madison Street, Suite 400, Jefferson City, Missouri 65101.

Jacqueline Whipple, Dentons, 4520 Main Street, Suite 1100, Kansas City, Missouri 64111.

Roger W Steiner, Evergy, P.O. Box 418679,1200 Main Street, 16th Floor, Kansas City, Missouri 64105-9679.

STAFF OF THE MISSOURI PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION:

Jeff Keevil, Deputy Counsel, Post Office Box 360, Governor Office Building, 200 Madison Street, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102.

OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC COUNSEL:

Lindsay VanGerpen, Counsel, Post Office Box 2230, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102.

MIDWEST ENERGY CONSUMERS GROUP:

Tim Opitz, Opitz Law Firm, LLC, 308 E. High Street, Suite B101, Jefferson City, Missouri 65101.

NUCOR STEEL SEDALIA, LLC:

Marc H Ellinger, Ellinger Law Firm, 308 E. High Street, Suite 300, Jefferson City, Missouri 65101.

VELVET TECH SERVICES, LLC:

Stephanie S Bell, Ellinger Law Firm, 308 E. High Street, Suite 300, Jefferson City, Missouri 65101.

SENIOR REGULATORY LAW JUDGE: John T. Clark

 

5


FINANCING ORDER

Procedural History

On March 11, 2022, Evergy Missouri West, Inc. d/b/a Evergy Missouri West (Evergy West) submitted to the Commission a petition for a financing order, seeking authority to issue securitized utility tariff bonds regarding the extraordinary costs incurred by Evergy West on behalf of its customers during the mid-February 2021 cold weather event known as Winter Storm Uri. Evergy West filed that petition under Section 393.1700, RSMo. (Securitization Law).

The Commission granted intervention to Midwest Energy Consumers’ Group (MECG); The Missouri Industrial Energy Consumers (MIEC); Nucor Steel Sedalia, LLC (Nucor); and Velvet Tech Services, LLC (Velvet).

The parties prefiled direct, rebuttal, and surrebuttal testimony.1 An evidentiary hearing was held August 1, 2022, through August 4, 2022. The parties filed post-hearing briefs on August 31, 2022, and reply briefs on September 12, 2022.2

Proposed Stipulation and Agreement

On the first day of the evidentiary hearing, Evergy West, the Staff of the Commission (Staff), and the Office of the Public Counsel (Public Counsel) submitted a Non-Unanimous Stipulation and Agreement (Stipulation) setting forth negotiated resolutions to certain contested issues among its signatories. MECG, Nucor, and Velvet were not signatories to the Stipulation, but affirmatively represented that they did not oppose it. The Stipulation did not include a proposed financing order, providing instead

 

1 

MIEC did not file testimony or a position statement, and the Regulatory Law Judge granted MIEC’s request to be excused from the evidentiary hearing.

2 

The case is considered submitted as of the date of the final brief. 20 CSR 4240-2.150(1).

 

6


that the signatories agreed to modify the proposed financing order previously filed by Evergy West in order to (i) comply with the Securitization Law, (ii) incorporate the terms of the Stipulation and (iii) resolve cost recovery issues that remained contested. Some terms agreed in the Stipulation lacked sufficient detail to adequately resolve an issue, particularly those requiring a dollar amount. Despite the omission of a proposed financing order and certain imprecise terms, the Stipulation provided that it must be unconditionally approved by the Commission, without modification, or would be rendered void.

The Commission did not oppose the parties’ efforts to reach agreement on certain contested issues, nor was the Commission dissatisfied with the terms of the Stipulation when complete. However, as proposed by the Stipulation, the Commission would be approving a financing order developed by the signatories that had yet to be written, and it is unclear if the Commission would be able to modify that financing order. The Commission will not approve the Stipulation because it is incomplete without a financing order and provided for no opportunity for Commission examination and input on the financing order.

Post-Order Motions

The Commission issued its Report and Order on October 7, 2022, to be effective on November 6, 2022. Evergy West, Staff, and Public Counsel filed timely applications for clarification and rehearing. Evergy West filed a response opposing parts of Public Counsel’s clarification and rehearing application. After reviewing the clarification and rehearing motions, and Evergy West’s response, the Commission has decided to amend its order to clarify the customary method of ratemaking, tax deduction issues, resource planning issues, and to correct an ordered paragraph. This Amended Report and Order will be effective in ten days. If anyone believes that rehearing, reconsideration, or clarification is needed, they must file a new or renewed application for rehearing, reconsideration, or clarification before the effective date of this order.

 

7


Description of Securitization

Findings of Fact

1. In February 2021, Missouri was impacted by a severe winter weather event causing record sub-zero temperatures, snow and ice accumulation, and high winds. This cold weather occurrence from February 10, 2021 to February 19, 2021 is known as Winter Storm Uri (Winter Storm Uri).3

2. Evergy West seeks to recover qualified extraordinary costs resulting from Winter Storm Uri pursuant to the Securitization Law through the issuance of securitized utility tariff bonds.4

3. Securitization is a process authorized for the first time in Missouri by the legislature in the 2021 general legislative session with the adoption of the Securitization Law.5

4. Securitization is the financing of the purchase of a property right from a utility with the proceeds of securities issued by an entity whose credit quality is separated from that of the utility to attain higher credit ratings and lower financing costs. The utility sells the revenue stream and other entitlements and property created by a financing order, known as securitization property, to a newly established bankruptcy-remote special purpose entity (SPE) in a transaction that is a “true sale” for bankruptcy purposes.6

 

3 

Ives Direct, Ex. 8, Pages 6-14.

4 

Lunde Direct, Ex. 13, Schedule SL-2, Financing Order, Page 3.

5 

HB 734, Section 393.1700, RSMo, effective August 28, 2021.

6 

Lunde Direct, Ex. 13, Page 6, Lines 6-11.

 

8


5. A “true sale” transaction passes title, legal and equitable, to a SPE entity so that a bankruptcy court would not be expected to overturn the transaction and declare securitization property to be owned by a debtor utility in the event of bankruptcy and therefore subject to creditor actions.7

6. The securitization property will be composed of Evergy West’s rights and interests created under this Financing Order, including the irrevocable right to impose, bill, charge, collect, and receive from Evergy West’s retail electric customers the Securitized Utility Tariff Charge (SUTC), in amounts sufficient to pay principal and interest on the securitization bonds when due and ongoing financing costs.8

7. The SUTC will be paid by all existing and future retail customers receiving electrical service from Evergy West or its successors or assignees.9

8. Pursuant to the Securitization Law, Evergy West will transfer the irrevocable right to impose, bill, charge, collect and receive the SUTC and its other rights under the financing order to a newly created SPE to separate securitization bonds from Evergy West’s credit.10

 

7 

Lunde Direct, Ex. 13, Page 31, Lines 20-23.

8 

Lunde Direct, Ex. 13, Page 7, Lines 20-23.

9 

Klote Direct, Ex. 11, Page 4, Lines 8-12. One Evergy West customer is served under a special contract established prior to August 28, 2021, and is exempted from the SUTC by statute.

10 

Lunde Direct, Ex. 13, Page 28, Lines 6-8.

 

9


9. The SPE is formed to acquire the securitization property, issue the securitization bonds, pledge its assets to the trustee under the indenture, enter into related contracts, and perform other limited activities related to those basic purposes. The SPE is prohibited from engaging in other activities and will have no assets other than the securitization property and related assets. Obligations relating to the securitization bonds are the SPE’s only significant liabilities.11

10. Under securitization the Commission authorizes the issuance of securitization bonds to finance the recovery of qualified extraordinary costs. The issuance of securitization bonds mitigates rate increases that would otherwise be necessary to recover those costs.12

11. Securitization will allow Evergy West to immediately recover extraordinary costs from Winter Storm Uri, including carrying costs from the date those costs were incurred to the date the securitization bonds are issued.13

12. Securitization saves ratepayers money because the costs of securitization are lower than customary ratemaking. The interest rate paid on AAA rated securitization bonds is lower than the interest rate that would be applied to Evergy West’s carrying costs if recovered through customary ratemaking.14

Conclusions of Law

A. Evergy West is an electric corporation as defined in Section 386.020(15), RSMo.

B. Section 393.1700.2(2) allows an electrical corporation, which includes Evergy West, to petition the Commission for a financing order to allow for issuance of “securitized utility tariff bonds” to finance “qualified extraordinary costs.”

 

11 

Lunde Direct, Ex. 13, Page 31, Lines 13-19.

12 

Klote Direct, Ex. 11, Page 6, Lines 16-20.

13 

Ives Direct, Ex. 8, Page 16, Lines 6-9.

14 

Ives Direct, Ex. 8, Page 16-17, Lines 2-22, 1-16.

 

10


C. “Qualified extraordinary costs” are defined in Section 393.1700.1(13) as:

Costs incurred prudently before, on, or after August 28, 2021, of an extraordinary nature which would cause extreme customer rate impacts if reflected in retail customer rates recovered through customary ratemaking, such as but not limited to purchases of fuel or power, inclusive of carrying charges, during anomalous weather events;

D. The term “bonds” means securitization bonds or securitized utility tariff bonds as defined in Section 393.1700.1(15) RSMo.

E. The term “Securitization Property” means securitized utility tariff property or securitization property as defined in Section 393.1700.1(18) RSMo.

F. “Securitized utility tariff charge” is defined in Section 393.1700.1(16) as:

the amounts authorized by the Commission to repay, finance, or refinance securitized utility tariff costs and financing costs and that are, except as otherwise provided for in this section, nonbypassable charges imposed on and part of all retail customer bills, collected by an electrical corporation or its successors or assignees, or a collection agent, in full, separate and apart from the electrical corporation’s base rates, and paid by all existing or future retail customers receiving electrical service from the electrical corporation or its successors or assignees under commission-approved rate schedules, except for customers receiving electrical service under special contracts as of August 28, 2021, even if a retail customer elects to purchase electricity from an alternative electricity supplier following a fundamental change in regulation of public utilities in this state;

G. Evergy West sought to securitize “qualified extraordinary costs” associated with the anomalous weather event of February 2021, known as Winter Storm Uri, in its petition in this file, File No. EF-2022-0155.

Contested Issues

The Securitization Law mandates that a financing order regarding the petitions for securitization authority include certain findings and other provisions. This Financing Order will meet all requirements of the statute. Not all of those requirements are contested. The order will first address the issues contested by the parties and then will address the additional statutory requirements that were not contested.

 

11


1. What amount of qualified extraordinary costs caused by Winter Storm Uri should the Commission authorize Evergy West to finance using securitized utility tariff bonds?

Findings of Fact15

13. In February 2021, Missouri was impacted by a severe winter weather event causing record sub-zero temperatures, snow and ice accumulation, and high winds. This cold weather occurrence from February 10, 2021, through February 19, 2021, is referred to as Winter Storm Uri. During Winter Storm Uri, Missouri, including Evergy West’s service area,16 experienced exceedingly cold temperatures, rolling electrical blackouts, and extreme natural gas prices.17

14. Evergy West is a member of the Southwest Power Pool, Inc. (SPP), a regional transmission organization (RTO) that exists to ensure the reliable supply of power and adequate transmission infrastructure as well as competitive wholesale electricity prices.18

15. February 2021 was among the ten coldest Februarys on record for Missouri, according to the National Oceanic and Atmosphere Administration. Temperatures for the period from February 6, 2021, to February 19, 2021, averaged more than 20 degrees below normal, the coldest 2-week period to impact Missouri in over 30 years, according to the Missouri Climate Center at the University of Missouri, College of Agriculture.19

 

15 

Issues are divided for purposes of organization and clarity. Findings of fact are cumulative; each set of findings incorporates findings stated for any previous issues.

16 

Ives Direct, Ex. 8, Pages 6-14.

17 

Ives Direct, Ex. 8, Page 6, Lines 7-18.

18 

Ives Direct, Ex. 8, Page 7, Lines 2-6.

19 

Ives Direct, Ex. 8, Pages 12-13, Lines 12-19, 3-6.

 

12


16. On February 14, 2021, SPP declared an Energy Emergency Alert that it was expecting weather conditions where all available resources would be needed to meet firm load obligations, and that it might not be able to sustain contingency reserves.20

17. On February 15, 2021, SPP declared an Energy Emergency Alert that its operating reserves fell below the required minimum. SPP committed all of its reserves and exhausted other avenues, resulting in it directing its members to implement controlled interruptions. Evergy West started to shed load at approximately noon and began customer service interruptions.21 As the cold weather conditions persisted, Evergy West was again instructed to shed load on the morning of February 16, 2021, and Evergy West again interrupted service to customers.22

18. Evergy West continuously served customers during February 2021, with the exception of the above two load shedding events.23

19. Due to the extreme cold weather brought on by Winter Storm Uri, the price of natural gas increased dramatically. These higher fuel costs resulted in day-ahead and real-time electricity prices reaching SPP record highs of $4,393/MWh (February 18, 2021) and $4,029/MWh (February 16, 2021), respectively.24

 

20 

Ives Direct, Ex. 8, Page 7, Lines 6-10.

21

Ives Direct, Ex. 8, Page 8, Lines 2-10.

22

Ives Direct, Ex. 8, Pages 8-9, Lines 17-20, 1-6.

23

Ives Direct, Ex. 8, Page 9, Lines 18-19.

24

Ives Direct, Ex. 8, Pages 11-12, Lines 15-20, 1-3.

 

13


20. Evergy West incurred approximately $11.8 million in fuel costs (an increase of $8.3 million from its average February fuel costs over 2018-2020), and $314.6 million in purchased power costs (an increase of $299.8 million from its average February purchased power costs). After adjustments for transmission costs, disallowances, and off-system sales revenue, Evergy West’s total energy costs were $315.0 million, an increase of $296.5 million from its average February total energy costs.25 Evergy West seeks to recover $295.5 million in fuel costs along with $54.6 million in carrying costs as “qualified extraordinary costs” under the Securitization Law.26

21. Recovering $295.5 million plus carrying costs through Evergy West’s fuel and purchased power adjustment clause (FAC) would be harmful to Evergy West’s customers. The FAC is intended to recover costs incurred during a six-month period over a subsequent twelve-month period. Recovering the entirety of the Winter Storm Uri costs through the FAC would create extreme customer rate impacts.27

22. Recovering Winter Storm Uri costs and revenues through FAC is not in the best interest of Evergy West or its customers, because of the extraordinary amount of costs that were incurred.28

23. In total, Evergy West seeks authority to securitize $356,720,636 for costs related to Winter Storm Uri. This amount includes $296,638,919 for fuel costs before applying the 99.62 percent retail energy allocator, $54,569,187 for carrying costs, and $6,639,758 in up-front financing costs. The total amount also removes non-fuel operation and maintenance costs of $274,934 that Evergy West originally sought to recover in its direct filing.29

 

25 

Ives Direct, Ex. 8, Page 14, Lines 12-17.

26 

Klote Surrebuttal, Ex. 12, Page 14 Table 1

27 

Ives Direct, Ex. 8, Page 15, Lines 20-22.

28 

Klote Direct, Ex. 11, Page 7, Lines 16-20.

29 

Klote Surrebuttal, Ex.12, Pages 13-14, Lines 18-19 and Table 1.

 

14


Conclusions of Law30

H. Section 393.1700.1(13) defines “qualified extraordinary costs as:

Costs incurred prudently before, on, or after August 28, 2021, of an extraordinary nature which would cause extreme customer rate impacts if reflected in retail customer rates recovered through customary ratemaking, such as but not limited to those related to purchases of fuel or power, inclusive of carrying charges, during anomalous weather events.

I. Section 393.1700.2(2), RSMo sets out the content that must be included in a utility’s petition for a financing order to finance qualified extraordinary costs.

J. The Commission has previously issued a financing order authorizing the cost recovery of qualified extraordinary costs for Winter Storm Uri through securitization for another Missouri electric utility in File No. EO-2022-0040.31

Decision32

The Commission finds, based on the decisions in the following subsections, that Evergy West’s costs in the amount of $307,811,24633 incurred in relation to Winter Storm Uri are prudently incurred costs of an extraordinary nature that would cause extreme customer rate impacts if reflected in customer rates recovered through customary ratemaking and as such are “qualified extraordinary costs” as defined in Section 393.1700.1(13), RSMo. The Commission finds that the recovery of this amount is just and reasonable, and in the public interest. The Commission further finds that Winter Storm Uri was an “anomalous weather event” within the meaning of that statutory definition.

 

30 

Issues are divided for purposes of organization and clarity only. Conclusions of law are cumulative; each set of conclusions incorporates conclusions stated for any previous issues, as necessary. Some issues may not require additional conclusions of law.

31 

EO-2022-0040, Amended Report and Order, issued September 22, 2022.

32 

The number indicated in this section is derived from the Commission decisions on particular issues described subsequently in this order.

33 

Qualified extraordinary costs of $307,811,246 based on the sum of $280,667,566 in fuel and purchased power costs and $27,143,680 in carrying costs.

 

15


A) What amount of the costs, if any, that Evergy West is seeking to securitize would Evergy West recover through customary ratemaking?

B) What is the appropriate method of customary ratemaking absent securitization? What is the appropriate method of customary ratemaking absent securitization?

C) Under Section 393.1700.2(2)(e), 1 what is the “customary method of financing”? What are the costs that would result “from the application of the customary method of financing and reflecting the qualified extraordinary costs in retail customer rates”?

D) Should Evergy West’s recovery include more than 95% of fuel and purchased power costs? Should Evergy West’s recovery through securitized bonds include more than 95% of fuel and purchased power costs?

These four sub-issues are interrelated and the Commission will address them together.

Findings of Fact

24. The Commission authorized Evergy West to defer $297,316,445 of extraordinary costs from its FAC associated with Winter Storm Uri from its Accumulation Period 28, which encompassed the six-month period from December 2020 through May 2021. $6,588,116 of fuel and purchased power costs were approved to be passed through the FAC and were not considered extraordinary costs. 34

25. Evergy West calculated the extraordinary cost amount to be removed from Accumulation Period 28 by calculating a three-year average baseline for February costs, using actual February costs for fuel, purchased power, emissions, transmission expense, and off-system sales revenues for the years 2018 through 2020.35

 

34 

Fortson Rebuttal, Ex. 102, Page 2, Lines 6-9 and footnote 2, and Order Approving Fuel Adjustment True-up and Approving Tariff to Change Fuel Adjustment Rates, File No. ER-2022-0005 (Aug. 18, 2021).

35 

Fortson Rebuttal, Ex. 102, Page 3, Lines 18-21.

 

16


26. Evergy West incurred approximately $11.8 million in fuel costs, which is an increase of $8.3 million from its average February fuel costs over the three years from 2018 to 2020. Evergy West incurred approximately $314.6 million in purchased power costs, which is an increase of $299.8 million from its February average. After adjustments for transmission costs, disallowances,36 and off-system sales revenue, Evergy West’s total energy costs were $315.0 million, an increase of $296.5 million from its average February total energy costs.37

27. Evergy West incurred approximately $296.5 million in extraordinary fuel and purchased power costs for its Missouri customers during Winter Storm Uri, of which $295.5 million was allocated to its retail customers based on a 99.62 percent retail energy allocator.38

28. Customarily, Absent securitization, Evergy West would file a fuel adjustment tariff designed to recover 95 percent of the energy cost differences from base rates. A fuel adjustment tariff filing is the customary procedure to recover fuel and purchased power costs or to credit revenues. A significant portion of cost recovery occurs in the first year for recovery following an expense through a FAC filing.39

29. Evergy West’s FAC was first established in 2007.40 Every Evergy West general rate case since then has included a 95/5 sharing mechanism in Evergy West’s FAC tariff.41

 

36 

Disallowances as used here refers to disallowances as understood by Evergy West as part of its direct filing, and not the Commission’s approved disallowances included in this order.

37 

Ives Direct, Ex. 8, Page 14, Lines 12-17.

38 

Klote Surrebuttal, Ex. 12, Page 14, Table 1.

39 

Klote Direct, Ex. 11, Pages 8-9, Lines 22-23, 1-2.

40 

Evergy West was then known as Aquila, and then KCP&L Greater Missouri Operations, before finally becoming Evergy Missouri West.

41 

Fortson Rebuttal, Ex. 102, Page 10, Lines 3-17.

 

17


30. Evergy West’s FAC does not allow it to recover 100 percent of its fuel and purchased power costs. Evergy West’s FAC requires it to accumulate its actual net energy costs over a six-month accumulation period, followed by a twelve-month recovery period during which the amount of actual net energy costs over the net base energy costs is reduced by a jurisdictional factor, and then 95 percent of that difference is either returned to or collected from customers.42

31. Evergy West’s FAC requires it to retain 5 percent of any overcollected amounts or absorb 5 percent of any undercollected amounts for each accumulation period.43

32. The Commission included the 95/5 sharing mechanism in Evergy West’s FAC to protect it from extreme fluctuations in fuel and purchased power costs while providing the company an incentive to take all reasonable actions to keep its fuel and purchased power costs as low as possible, and yet still have an opportunity to earn a fair return on its investment.44

33. If Evergy West were allowed to recover 100 percent of its fuel and purchased power costs, regardless of how high fuel costs go, it would be less incentivized to keep its fuel and purchased power costs as low as possible. Evergy West would bear no risk for those costs and all the costs and risk for Evergy West’s fuel and purchased power decisions would shift to ratepayers.45

 

42 

When combined with an interest calculation and true-up adjustment.

43 

Fortson Rebuttal, Ex. 102, Pages 7-8, Lines 18-23, 1.

44 

Fortson Rebuttal, Ex. 102, Pages 12-13, Lines 15-21, 1-3.

45 

Fortson Rebuttal, Ex. 102, Page 13, Lines 16-19.

 

18


34. Another mechanism Evergy West could use to recover qualified extraordinary costs is to use an accounting authority order (AAO) to defer and amortize the costs over a specified period of time. An AAO is merely a deferral mechanism that permits the deferral of costs from one period to another. Deferred costs are booked as assets rather than expenses, and the Commission determines in a future rate case what deferred costs, if any, may be recovered in rates.46

35. Recovery through an AAO, if granted, would amortize extraordinary costs, including carrying costs, in the revenue requirement calculations in a future rate case filing where the Commission could allow those costs to be recovered over a specified period of time.47 Staff would likely recommend at least a 15-year amortization period, with carrying costs calculated at the company’s long-term debt rate.48Due to the extraordinary amount of the fuel and purchased power it incurred in February 2021 resulting from Winter Storm Uri, Evergy West sought to defer the fuel and purchased power costs associated with this event to an AAO for consideration in a future rate case in File No. EU-2021-0283. That AAO case is still pending, but Evergy West would not need to defer any costs in that case if it moves ahead with securitization under this Financing Order.49

36. If an AAO was established, Staff would not recommend deferral or recovery of the five percent of the utility’s share of fuel and purchased power costs under the FAC. Staff contends that not allowing recovery of the five percent of the fuel and purchased power costs represents an appropriate sharing of the financial impacts of Winter Storm Uri between ratepayers and shareholders.50

 

46 

Bolin Rebuttal, Ex. 100, Page 5, Lines 11-16.

47 

Klote Direct, Ex. 11, Page 9, Lines 10-14.

48 

Bolin Rebuttal, Ex. 100, Page 7, Lines 1-11.

49 

Bolin Rebuttal, Ex. 100, Pages 5-6, Lines 7-16, 1-21.

50 

Bolin Rebuttal, Ex. 100, Page 8, Lines 2-9.

 

19


37. Applying the same sharing incentive for Winter Storm Uri costs will give Evergy West an incentive to plan for and to efficiently manage extraordinary events that impact fuel and purchased power, which are its biggest costs.51

38. Staff proposes a disallowance of $14,771,657.61, which is 5 percent of the total deferred fuel and purchased power costs for Winter Storm Uri, excluding non-fuel operation and maintenance costs, after applying the Missouri jurisdictional factor and retail energy allocator.52

Conclusions of Law

K. Section 386.266.1, RSMo allows an electrical corporation to apply to the Commission to approve rate schedules that allow for “periodic rate adjustments outside of general rate proceedings to reflect increases and decreases in its prudently incurred fuel and purchased power costs.” That section also allows the Commission to “include in such rate schedules features designed to provide the electrical corporation with incentives to improve the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of its fuel and purchased power procurement activities.” The 95/5 sharing provision in Evergy West’s FAC tariff is designed to provide such an incentive.

L. In its report and order that initially established Evergy West’s FAC, the Commission found that “a prudence review can be expected to evaluate the major decisions a utility makes. However, a utility makes thousands of small decisions every hour regarding fuel, purchased power, and off-system sales. It is not practical to expect a prudence review to uncover and evaluate every one of those decisions.”53

 

51 

Mantle Rebuttal, Ex. 201, Page 27, Lines 16-20.

52 

Fortson Rebuttal, Ex. 102, Page 8, Lines 1-5.

53 

In the Matter of The Empire District Electric Company’s Tariffs to Increase Rates for Electric Service Provided to Customers in the Missouri Service Area of the Company, 17, Mo. P.S.C. 631, 667 (2008)

 

20


M. Commission Rule 20 CSR 4240-20.090(8)(A)2.A(XI) provides that extraordinary costs are not to be passed through the company’s FAC.

N. The securitization statute, Section 393.1700.2(3)(c) requires a financing order issued by the Commission to include all of the following elements:

a. The amount of securitized utility tariff costs to be financed using securitized utility tariff bonds and a finding that recovery of such costs is just and reasonable and in the public interest. The commission shall describe and estimate the amount of financing costs that may be recovered through securitized utility tariff charges and specify the period over which securitized utility tariff costs and financing costs may be recovered;

b. A finding that the proposed issuance of securitized utility tariff bonds and the imposition and collection of a securitized utility tariff charge are just and reasonable and in the public interest and are expected to provide quantifiable net present value benefits to customers as compared to recovery of the components of securitized utility tariff costs that would have been incurred absent the issuance of securitized utility tariff bonds.

Notwithstanding any provisions of this section to the contrary, in considering whether to find the proposed issuance of securitized utility tariff bonds and the imposition and collection of a securitized utility tariff charge are just and reasonable and in the public interest, the commission may consider previous instances where it has issued financing orders to the petitioning electrical corporation and such electrical corporation has previously issued securitized utility tariff bonds; …

(emphasis added)

There are two important provisions of this section of the statute that should be noted. First, the section explicitly requires the Commission to determine that the imposition and collection of the utility tariff charge that will result from the securitization of these costs will be just and reasonable and in the public interest. Second, in making its determination as to whether the securitization of these costs is just and reasonable and in the public interest, the Commission is directed to compare the results of the securitization to the results of a recovery of those costs using traditional (non-securitization) methods.

 

21


O. Evergy West asserts that it has a general right to recover all prudently incurred costs. The Missouri Supreme Court has found otherwise. In a 2021 case, Spire Missouri, Inc. v. Public Service Commission,54 Spire Missouri challenged the Commission’s decision to disallow a portion of the company’s prudently incurred cost of pursuing its general rate case. In upholding the Commission’s decision, the Supreme Court said:

In terms of their reasonableness, these expenditures were entitled to a presumption of prudence, and the prudence of the expenditures was never called into question. Nonetheless, the PSC concluded that including all of these expenditures in setting Spire’s future rates was not just because some of the expenses were not fair to ratepayers in that they were incurred to benefit (if anyone) Spire’s shareholders. Implicit in Spire’s argument is an assertion that it is entitled to recover all prudent expenditures in its rates. This is not so. In setting rates the PSC has broad discretion to include or exclude expenditures to arrive at rates it deems to be ‘just and reasonable,’ subject, of course, to judicial review that the PSC’s conclusions are supported by competent and substantial evidence and not arbitrary, capricious, or an abuse of discretion. (Internal citations omitted. Emphasis in original.)

P. Section 386.266.1, RSMo allows an electrical corporation to apply to the Commission to approve rate schedules that allow for “periodic rate adjustments outside of general rate proceedings to reflect increases and decreases in its prudently incurred fuel and purchased power costs.” That section also allows the Commission to “include in such rate schedules features designed to provide the electrical corporation with incentives to improve the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of its fuel and purchased power procurement activities.” The 95/5 sharing provision in Evergy West’s FAC tariff is designed to provide such an incentive.

 

54 

618 S.W.3d 225 (Mo. banc 2021).

 

22


Q. In its Report and Order that initially established Evergy West’s FAC, the Commission found that “after-the-fact prudence reviews alone are insufficient to assure Aquila [now Evergy West] will continue to take reasonable steps to keep its fuel and purchased power costs down, and the easiest way to ensure a utility retains the incentive to keep fuel and purchased power costs down is to not allow a 100 percent pass through of those costs.” and “allowing Aquila to pass 95 percent of its prudently incurred fuel and purchased power costs, above those included in its base rates, through its FAC is appropriate. With a 95 percent pass-through, the Commission finds Aquila [now Evergy West] will be protected from extreme fluctuations in fuel and purchased power cost, yet retain a significant incentive to take all reasonable actions to keep its fuel and purchased power costs as low as possible, and still have an opportunity to earn a fair return on its investment.”55

Decision

Customarily, Evergy West would recover fuel and purchased power costs in excess of those reflected in its base rates through its FAC contained in its tariff, which is where the costs Evergy West seeks to securitize were removed from. Due to the extraordinary nature of the costs for fuel and purchased power attributable to Winter Storm Uri,56 the Commission permitted Evergy West to remove those costs from its FAC pursuant to Commission Rule 20 CSR 4240-20.090(8)(A)2.A.(XI). If those costs were to pass through Evergy West’s FAC they would be subject to the 95/5 sharing provision. Under that provision Evergy West would be entitled to recover 95 percent of costs for its fuel and purchased power.

 

55 

File No. ER-2007-0004, Report and Order, Pages 53-54, issued May 17, 2007.

56 

The prudence of Evergy West’s decisions relating to Winter Storm Uri are not relevant for this issue, but will be addressed in subsequent issues.

 

23


Prior to seeking recovery of these costs through securitization, Evergy West sought recovery through an AAO, which would allow Evergy West to defer those costs for consideration in a later rate case. An AAO is not the customary method through which fuel and purchased power costs are recovered, but using an AAO to defer costs to a future rate case is another method of cost recovery. Under an AAO the Commission would determine what costs Evergy West would be permitted to defer, and later the Commission would have to determine what amount of costs deferred, if any, Evergy West could recover through rates. Staff has stated that for recovery through an AAO it would also recommend that Evergy West recover only 95 percent of the fuel and purchased power costs for Winter Storm Uri.

In the rate case in which Evergy West’s FAC was established, the Commission found that the sharing mechanism was necessary to ensure that Evergy West had sufficient financial incentive and motivation to operate at maximum efficiency. The same financial incentives and motivations apply in the situation facing Evergy West during Winter Storm Uri. Evergy West has presented no compelling reason why it should be entitled to a higher percentage than it would receive under conventional recovery of these costs. Evergy West’s primary assertion is that recovery under the Securitization Law does not require a 95/5 sharing mechanism. However, recovery through securitization requires a comparison to recovery absent securitization, which would be through Evergy West’s FAC or an AAO. Under the FAC only 95 percent of fuel and purchased power costs would be recoverable, not 100 percent. If an AAO had been utilized instead of the FAC, there would be no guarantee as to the amount that Evergy West would recover or what additional offsets, such as extraordinary revenues, could occur.

 

24


Recovery through securitization requires that the costs incurred be qualified extraordinary costs and that those costs are “of an extraordinary nature which would cause extreme customer rate impacts if reflected in retail customer rates recovered through customary ratemaking.” Recovery through securitization mitigates those impacts, which is beneficial to Evergy West’s customers, but Evergy West receives its recovery of those costs much quicker than it would through customary recovery methods. Evergy Wests seeks to add the additional incentive of recovering an additional five percent beyond what it would normally be entitled to recover.

The Commission finds that allowing Evergy West to use securitization to recover an additional five percent of its fuel and purchased power costs related to Winter Storm Uri, which it would not be permitted to recover under traditional methods of ratemaking, is not just and reasonable, nor is it in the public interest. The Commission also finds that the appropriate method of customary ratemaking absent securitization would be through Evergy West’s FAC.

E) What is the appropriate adjustment related to non-fuel operations and maintenance (NFOM) costs?

Findings of Fact

39. As part of the costs attributable to Winter Storm Uri to be recovered through securitization, Evergy West sought to recover NFOM costs.57 Evergy West’s securitization petition included NFOM expenses attributed to Winter Storm Uri estimated at $274,934.58

 

57 

Bolin Rebuttal, Ex. 100, Page 7, Lines 13-16.

58 

File No. EF-2022-0155, Petition for Financing Order Authorizing the Issuance of Securitized Utility Tariff Bonds to Finance Qualified Extraordinary Costs Caused by Winter Storm Uri in February 2021, Page 13.

 

25


40. Evergy West incurred NFOM expenses related to Winter Storm Uri for communications, overtime for its employees and payroll taxes on the overtime costs, additional contractor costs, damage claims, and costs for additional materials.59

41. Staff did not include Evergy West’s NFOM costs for recovery through securitization. Staff has included these costs in Staff’s cost of service in Evergy West’s currently pending rate case, File No. ER-2022-0130.60

42. Evergy West has agreed to remove its request for NFOM costs from the amount to be recovered through securitization and will include them in the revenue requirement in its general rate case.61

Conclusions of Law

R. Section 393.1700.1(13) states that qualified extraordinary costs are “not limited to those [costs] related to purchases of fuel or power, inclusive of carrying charges, during anomalous weather events.”

Decision

Securitization requires that the Commission identify the amount of qualified extraordinary costs, and that recovery of those costs is just and reasonable and in the public interest. NFOM costs that Evergy West sought to recover in its petition are costs that were incurred due to Winter Storm Uri. Staff argues that it has included these costs in Evergy West’s currently pending general rate case. Evergy West has changed its position from its petition and now agrees that those costs should be addressed within its pending rate case. The Commission finds that because these costs are being recovered through Evergy West’s rate case, additional recovery through securitization is not just and reasonable or in the public interest.

 

59 

Klote Direct, Ex. 11, Page 10, Lines 15-21, and Schedule RAK-1.

60 

Bolin Rebuttal, Ex. 100, Page 7, Lines 13-20.

61 

Klote Surrebuttal, Ex. 12, page 6, Lines 2-6.

 

26


F) Should Evergy West’s recovery through securitized bonds reflect an offset based on certain higher than normal customer revenues received by Evergy West during Winter Storm Uri?

Findings of Fact

43. During Winter Storm Uri, Evergy West sold more electricity than it would have sold during a normal February. Staff determined the amount of baseline retail revenues that exceeded Evergy West’s three-year average for February 2021 to be $8,612,108 in “excess” revenue. Staff proposes to use this amount of “excess” revenue to partially offset the “qualified extraordinary costs” incurred by Evergy West.62

44. Evergy West’s $8.6 million in revenues attributable to Winter Storm Uri are approximately 1.1 percent of its normal annual base retail revenues. In contrast, the fuel and purchased power incurred in two weeks from Winter Storm Uri are about one year’s worth of fuel and purchased power.63

45. Evergy West’s earnings for 2021 overall resulted in a return on equity (ROE) well below the ROE assumed from its last rate case. Consequently, in 2021 Evergy West did not recover its costs to provide service and a sufficient return on capital to investors. There were no excess revenues in 2021.64

 

62 

Lange Rebuttal, Ex. 108, Page 33, Lines 11-16. See also, McMellen Rebuttal, Ex. 100, Page 5, Lines 12-17.

63 

Ives Surrebuttal, Ex. 9, Page 5, lines 4-8.

64 

Ives Surrebuttal, Ex. 6, Pages 5-6, Lines 20, 2.

 

27


Conclusions of Law

S. Section 393.1700.1(13) RSMo, allows for the recovery of costs through securitization that are prudently incurred during an anomalous weather event, and of an extraordinary nature.

Decision

Staff seeks to reduce the securitized amount by offsetting approximately $8.6 million in revenues attributable to Winter Storm Uri that Evergy West received in excess of its average February revenues. Staff proposes that allowing Evergy West to retain these revenues is not just and reasonable and in the public interest. The Securitization Law defines what is included as a qualified extraordinary cost and that definition does not include any offset of those costs for revenues.

This argument is similar to Evergy West’s argument that it should receive 100 percent of fuel and purchased power costs attributable to Winter Storm Uri, instead of the 95 percent it would have received through customary treatment of those costs. Staff’s argument to reduce the qualified extraordinary cost amount by offsetting that amount against “excess” revenue Evergy West earned as a result of Winter Storm Uri is rejected for the same reason the Commission rejected Evergy West’s argument for 100 percent recovery of costs.

Under traditional ratemaking there is no revenue adjustment for the effect of past weather, and no adjustment is made to reduce rates to retroactively recover “excess” revenue. Likewise, Evergy West could not increase rates to make up for a shortfall from events such as an unseasonably cool summer. Those fluctuations are addressed over time in the ratemaking process by normalizing the effect of those weather fluctuations in the company’s rates.

 

28


Section 393.1700.1(13) RSMo, allows for the recovery of prudently incurred costs. Staff makes no assertion that Evergy West’s fuel and purchased power costs were imprudent but seeks to offset those costs based upon Evergy West having higher than normal baseline revenues for February 2021. The revenues collected from customers through rates include the entire revenue requirement, all cost-of-service expenses and a return on rate base. Considering that Evergy West failed to meet its assumed rate of return for 2021, there is no showing by Staff that the higher than normal revenues from February 2021 were in fact “excess” revenue. Staff’s request to recover revenue is both not authorized by the Securitization Law, and is also not based in traditional ratemaking. The Commission does not find Staff’s proposal to be just and reasonable, and will not order a reduction or offset of qualified extraordinary costs for higher than normal revenues.

G) Should Evergy West’s recovery through securitized bonds reflect a disallowance based on Evergy West’s resource planning?

H) Were the costs incurred by Evergy West related to Winter Storm Uri as a result of its resource planning process just and reasonable?

 

  a.

If no, should Evergy West’s recovery through securitized bonds reflect a disallowance?

 

  b.

If yes, what amount should the Commission disallow?

The Commission will address these sub-issues together.

 

29


Findings of Fact

46. Public Counsel asserts that Evergy West’s resource planning is imprudent because it does not have enough generation resources to meet the energy requirements of its customers, and the company is relying on the energy from other utilities in the SPP to meet its customers’ needs.65 Public Counsel alleges that Evergy West’s retirement of its Sibley power plant and subsequent procurement of capacity from Evergy Missouri Metro (Evergy Metro) was imprudent.66

47. Prior to Winter Storm Uri, customers did not see an increased cost due to the implementation of Evergy West’s alleged imprudent resource planning decisions.67

48. Capacity is the maximum output an electricity generator can physically produce, measured in megawatts. Energy is the amount of electricity a generator produces over a defined period of time.68

49. Having enough capacity is essential to having enough energy to meet customers’ load requirements. However, having enough capacity does not necessarily ensure that energy will be available when it is needed. For instance, Evergy West does not have enough generation capacity through its owned resources and entered into purchased power agreements to meet the SPP resource adequacy standards. It can only meet the SPP resource adequacy standards when combined with Evergy Metro.69

50. Evergy West sells all of the energy it generates into the SPP Integrated Marketplace and purchases all the energy necessary to serve its native load customers from the SPP.70

 

65 

Mantle Rebuttal, Ex. 201, Page 9, Lines 3-6.

66 

Messamore Surrebuttal, Ex. 17, Page 9, Lines 11-15.

67 

Mantle Rebuttal, Ex. 201, Page 9, Lines 6-8.

68

Mantle Rebuttal, Ex. 201, Page 11, Lines 22-24.

69

Mantle Rebuttal, Ex. 201, Page 12, Lines 1-8.

70

Bridson Direct, Ex. 1, Page 6, Lines 7-10.

 

30


51. Evergy Metro and Evergy West report capacity to SPP as a combined entity.71

52. Evergy West has sufficient capacity to meet its SPP resource adequacy requirements and reserve margin as a standalone entity, though some of Evergy West’s capacity comes from a contract with Evergy Metro.72

53. Utilities that are members of a RTO commonly rely on market purchases as one source of generation in their portfolio.73

54. Evergy West completes and files an Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) every three years, with annual updates in intervening years, as outlined in the IRP rules in 20 CSR 4240-22.74

55. It is not possible for an electric utility to accurately plan for all extreme circumstances.75

56. Evergy West identified Sibley Unit 3 (Sibley), a coal fired plant, for retirement in its 2017 IRP annual update. Evergy West modeled Sibley’s retirement plan and a purchased power agreement over 18 scenarios, and in every scenario Sibley’s retirement was more economic than its continued operation.76

57. Evergy West’s decision to retire the Sibley plant was consistent with a local and nationwide trend. At the time Evergy West decided to retire Sibley, there was a drop in coal-fired generation, and that drop is expected to continue.77

 

71 

Messamore Surrebuttal, Ex. 17, Page 8, Lines 4-8.

72 

Messamore Surrebuttal, Ex. 17, Page 8, Lines 11-13.

73 

Reed Surrebuttal, Ex. 18, Page 18, Lines 13-14.

74 

Messamore Surebuttal, Ex. 17, Page 4, Lines 13-14.

75 

Mantle Rebuttal, Ex. 201, Page 10, Line 25.

76 

Messamore Surrebuttal, Ex. 17, Page 10, Lines 11-13.

77 

Kennedy Surrebuttal, Page 8, Line 8-11.

 

31


Conclusions of Law

T. The Commission’s electric utility resource planning rule, 20 CSR 4240-22.010(2) states in part:

The fundamental objective of the resource planning process at electric utilities shall be to provide the public with energy services that are safe, reliable, and efficient, at just and reasonable rates, in compliance with all legal mandates, and in a manner that serves the public interest and is consistent with state energy and environmental policies. …

U. Section 393.1700.1(13), RSMo, requires that qualified extraordinary costs be prudently incurred.

V. The Commission’s standard for assessing whether conduct was prudent considers whether the conduct was prudent at the time the utility had to solve a problem. The Commission’s prudence standard does not rely on hindsight.78

Decision

Public Counsel has alleged that Evergy West was imprudent in its resource planning, and that because of its imprudent resource planning, the amount of qualified extraordinary costs should be reduced. The Securitization Law allows for recovery of qualified extraordinary “costs incurred prudently before, on, or after August 28, 2021.” Public Counsel asks the Commission to reduce the amount of qualified extraordinary costs for Winter Storm Uri based upon the prudence of decisions made years prior to Winter Storm Uri. Public Counsel proposes that, but for Evergy West’s resource planning decisions, Winter Storm Uri costs would have been mitigated. However, Public Counsel did not demonstrate that at the time those decisions were made the costs from Winter Storm Uri were foreseeable. Public Counsel asks the Commission to examine whether Evergy West’s decision to retire Sibley without replacing it was prudent and whether Evergy West’s resource planning, more specifically its reliance on Evergy Metro to meet its SPP capacity requirement, was prudent. Public Counsel offers its own previous concerns about Evergy West’s resource planning as its primary evidence of imprudence.

 

78 

File No. EO-85-17, In the matter of the determination of in-service criteria for the Union Electric Company’s Callaway Nuclear Plant and Callaway rate base and related issues, page 13.

 

32


Public Counsel made the same argument in File No. EO-2022-0040, involving Liberty, who is also a member of SPP. In that case Liberty sought to securitize costs incurred from Winter Storm Uri. The Commission in its Amended Report and Order addressed Public Counsels argument, in part, as follows:

No doubt, if Liberty had more capacity available to sell into the SPP market during Winter Storm Uri, it could have earned enough from those sales to offset the fuel costs that it now seeks to securitize. But that fact is entirely based on perfect hindsight. Liberty planned to have sufficient capacity to meet all requirements established by SPP. Other than showing a bad result, Public Counsel has not demonstrated any imprudence in Liberty’s planning process.79

The Commission’s analysis in Liberty’s securitization case is equally applicable here. Public Counsel’s witness correctly states that there is no way to accurately plan for all extreme circumstances. If Sibley had not been retired, or had been replaced with alternative generation, it might have mitigated some of the costs from Winter Storm Uri, but customers would not have received any economic benefits from retiring Sibley. Additionally, there is no accurate way to quantify the amount of Winter Storm Uri costs would have been mitigated. That Evergy West chose to reduce foreseeable costs by retiring Sibley as opposed to the unforeseeable costs resulting from Winter Storm Uri is further support for its decision being prudent.

 

79 

File No. EO-2022-0040, Amended Report and Order, at page 33, issued September 22, 2022.

 

33


Evergy West provided sufficient evidence to determine that its resource planning, including its decision to retire Sibley, was reasonable at the time those decisions were made. Evergy West’s resource planning resulted in it meeting its SPP resource adequacy requirements. Evergy West presented evidence that it considered multiple scenarios when deciding whether to retire its Sibley Generator, and from the results of that analysis determined that it was economically beneficial to ratepayers to do so. The Commission disagrees with Public Counsel’s assessment that Evergy West’s resource planning was imprudent. The Commission will not reduce the qualified extraordinary cost amount based upon Evergy West’s resource planning.

I) Should Evergy West’s recovery through securitized bonds reflect a disallowance for income tax deductions for Winter Storm Uri costs?

J) Should Evergy West’s recovery through securitized bonds reflect a disallowance for the income tax deduction on the carrying costs for Winter Storm Uri costs?

The Commission will address these sub-issues together.

Findings of Fact

 

  58.

Evergy West is a member of a consolidated tax group, Evergy Inc.80

 

  59.

Evergy West was permitted a tax deduction when the Winter Storm Uri costs were incurred.81

 

80

Riley Surrebuttal, Ex. 206, Page 3, footnote 3.

81

Hardesty Surrebuttal, Page 3, Lines 4-5.

 

34


60. Evergy West did not take a tax deduction for Winter Storm Uri costs for book purposes and this created a timing difference. The deferred taxes were recorded on Evergy West’s books as a liability. 82

61. The SUTC will be listed as a separate line item on customers’ bills.83

62. The deferred tax liability recorded by Evergy West allows for the tax benefits associated with Storm Uri to be given to customers in future general rate cases over the life of the securitized bond.84

63. The revenue collected from customers to repay the bonds will be taxable and the SPE will have to pay tax on those revenues. The SPE will not be entitled to a tax deduction for the Winter Storm Uri costs since they were already deducted by Evergy West.85 The SPE will file a tax return as part of the consolidated income tax return filed by Evergy Inc.86

64. Public Counsel asserts that Evergy West expects to claim a one-time tax deduction of approximately $72.2 million on its 2021 consolidated income tax return for fuel and purchased power costs incurred during Winter Storm Uri,87 and that without a reduction in the proposed securitization amount to recognize this tax reduction, only Evergy West will benefit.

 

82 

Transcript, Page 229, Lines 4-21.

83 

Riley Rebuttal, Ex. 205, Page 7, Lines 1-2.

84 

Bolin Surrebuttal, Ex. 101, Page 4, Lines 15-18.

85 

Hardesty Surrebuttal, Page 3, Lines 5-8.

86

Bolin Surrebuttal, Ex. 101, Page 4, Lines 20-21.

87 

Riley Surrebuttal, Ex. 206, Page 3, Lines 9-11.

 

35


65. Public Counsel contends that ratepayers will pay for Evergy West’s tax write-off of $72.2 million, which will cost them $135 million over the 15-year term of securitization.88 Public Counsel argues this tax benefit should be recognized as a reduction in the securitization amount.89

66. Public Counsel states that when securitization is implemented, taxes will be applied to the line item that ratepayers will see on their monthly bill, the revenues from which are for the securitization bond repayment, and these taxes will be the responsibility of the ratepayer and not the Company.90 This is incorrect. Income taxes applicable to revenues collected from customers were not included in the calculation of the securitization amount by Staff or Evergy.91

67. In a rate case, the amount of taxes associated with the revenue the company collects is included in the base rates. There is no separate line item on a customer’s bill for federal or state income taxes, which the company will have to pay.92

68. Public Counsel, when comparing the income taxes collected as part of an FAC to income taxes collected with securitization,93 neglected to include the taxation of the revenues at the SPE. Once you include the taxes on the SPE, there is no difference between recovering the Winter Storm Uri costs through the FAC or through the securitization financing. There is no difference in the tax amount and no benefit to Evergy West.94

69. Public Counsel contends that taxes on the carrying costs will be spread over Evergy West’s 2021 and 2022 income tax returns.95

 

88 

Riley Surrebuttal, Ex. 206, Pages 3-4, Lines 22, 1.

89 

Riley Surrebuttal, Ex. 206, Page 3, Lines 11-12.

90 

Riley Rebuttal, Ex. 205, Page 5, Lines 15-18.

91 

Bolin Surrebuttal, Ex. 101, Page 3, Lines 13-17.

92 

Bolin Surrebuttal, Ex. 101, Page 3, Lines16-19.

93 

Riley Rebuttal, Ex. 205, Page 4, Lines 11-12.

94 

Hardesty Surrebuttal, Ex. 5, Pages 3-4, Lines 9, 1.

95 

Riley Surrebuttal, Ex. 206, Page 4, Lines 8-9.

 

36


70. The SUTC will be excluded from Evergy West’s revenues in a general rate case for calculating the cost of service.96

71. Evergy West is not taxed when the securitization bonds are issued.97 Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Revenue Procedure 2005-62 at .03 states that Evergy West does not have to recognize the income upon the issuance of the bonds or the receipt of the cash but does have to recognize the income as the nonbypassable charges are incurred or put on the customers’ bills.98

72. IRS Revenue Procedure 2005-62 provides a safe harbor for public utility companies that, pursuant to specified cost recovery legislation, receive an irrevocable financing order permitting the utility to recover certain specified costs through a qualifying securitization. Under this revenue procedure, Evergy West will not recognize taxable income upon the receipt of the financing order, the transfer of Evergy West’s rights under the Financing Order to the SPE, or the receipt of cash in exchange for the issuance of the Securitization Bonds. Evergy West will treat the SUTC as gross income to Evergy West.99

73. Any tax benefits associated with the Winter Storm Uri costs will be given to customers in future general rate cases over the life of the securitized bond. To include those benefits directly in the SUTC would double-count those benefits.100

 

96 

Bolin Surrebuttal, Ex. 101, Page 4, Lines 2-3.

97 

Hardesty Surrebuttal, Page 3, Lines 3-4.

98 

Transcript, Page 238, Lines 14-18.

99 

Humphrey Direct, Ex. 6, Pages 15-16, Lines 16-23, 1-2.

100 

Bolin Surrebuttal, Ex. 101, Page 4, Lines 15-18

 

37


74. The deferred taxes will be included in rate base until all the Winter Storm Uri costs are collected through the securitization financing.101 The revenues collected from Evergy West customers through the nonbypassable charge will be taxed to Evergy Inc. in its consolidated tax returns. Evergy Inc. is the parent company of Evergy West.102

Conclusions of Law

W. IRS Revenue Procedure 2005-62 states in part:

SECTION 6. APPLICATION

.01 The utility will be treated as not recognizing gross income upon

(1) The receipt of a financing order that creates an intangible property right in the amount of the specified costs that may be recovered through securitization;

(2) The receipt of cash or other valuable consideration in exchange for the transfer of that property right to a financing entity that is wholly owned, directly or indirectly, by the utility; or

(3) The receipt of cash or other valuable consideration in exchange for securitized instruments issued by the financing entity that is wholly owned, directly or indirectly, by the utility.

.02 The securitized instruments described in Section 5.04 will be treated as obligations of the utility.

.03 The nonbypassable charges are gross income to the utility recognized under the utility’s usual method of accounting.

X. Section 393.1700.2(3)(c)k, RSMo. requires that this order provide for a reconciliation process that would require Evergy West to account for any potential tax benefits that may lower its actual securitized utility tariff costs associated with Winter Storm Uri through a future rate case.

 

101

Hardesty Surrebuttal, Ex. 5, Page 4, Lines 7-11.

102

Transcript, Pages 335-336.

 

38


Decision

Public Counsel asks the Commission to reduce the securitized amount for tax deductions it says Evergy West will get for Winter Storm Uri costs, and also for a tax deduction on the carrying costs for Winter Storm Uri. Pursuant to IRS Revenue Procedure 2005-62, Evergy West does not have to recognize money received from the SPE pursuant to the financing order and the transfer of the deferred tax liability for costs expended due to Winter Storm Uri for income tax purposes. However, that does not mean that the revenues collected that typically offset the tax deduction related to fuel and purchased power costs (Winter Storm Uri costs) will not be recognized in future Evergy West rate cases. All revenues collected from Evergy West customers as part of the SUTC will be taxed in the tax periods received or recognized. Those amounts will be accounted for in Evergy Inc.’s consolidated tax returns. The deferred tax liability booked, associated with the Winter Storm Uri costs that resulted in a tax deduction in 2021 will be reduced as a debit to Evergy West’s rate base over the life of the securitization bonds corresponding to the income tax periods in which the revenues are recognized.

Additionally, the Securitization Law, at Section 393.1700.2(3)(c)k, RSMo., requires that this Financing Order provide for a reconciliation process to account for any potential tax benefits in a future rate case. Therefore, there is no need to disallow an uncertain tax amount now, when more information regarding what, if any, tax benefits Evergy West receives will be available and will be reconciled in a future rate case. Accordingly, the Commission will not reduce the securitized amount for tax deductions related to Winter Storm Uri costs, or carrying costs.

 

39


K) What are the appropriate carrying costs for Winter Storm Uri?

Findings of Fact

75. Evergy West incurred Winter Storm Uri costs in February, 2021, but has not yet recovered those costs from its customers. The Securitization Law allows Evergy West to securitize and recover carrying costs. Evergy West seeks carrying costs on the entire amount of qualified extraordinary costs through the proposed issuance date of the securitization bonds of January 2023.103 Evergy West contends those carrying costs should be calculated using Evergy West’s assumed WACC of 7.358 percent, plus taxes.104 The WACC plus applicable taxes Evergy West used in this proceeding is 8.9 percent.105 Evergy West assumes this WACC from the stipulation and agreement in Evergy West’s last general rate case, File No. ER-2018-0146, but that stipulation was silent as to specific components that determine the WACC.106

76. Evergy West has been carrying Winter Storm Uri costs using short-term debt.107

77. Public Counsel proposes using Evergy West’s average cost of short-term debt for carrying costs, compounded monthly.108

 

103 

Klote Direct, Ex. 11, Page 7, Lines 15-16.

104 

Klote Direct, Ex. 11, Page 10, Lines 4-5.

105 

Klote Direct, Ex. 11, Page 14, Lines 7-9.

106 

Murray Rebuttal, Ex. 203, Page 3, Lines 6-16.

107 

Transcript, Page 495, Lines 13-19

108 

Murray Rebuttal, Ex. 203, Page 2, Lines 6-8.

 

40


78. Short-term debt balances fluctuate and are heavily influenced by factors including operations, working capital needs, market conditions and special circumstances like Winter Storm Uri. Short-term debt is used as bridge financing by Evergy West until it can close on long-term debt financing. 109

79. Staff agrees that Evergy West should be allowed to recover carrying costs for Winter Storm Uri, but contends those carrying costs should be calculated using Evergy West’s long-term debt rate of 5.06 percent from File No. ER-2018-0146.110

80. In Evergy West’s current rate case, File No. ER-2022-0130, Evergy West estimated its embedded cost of long-term debt at 3.787 percent, as of May 31, 2022.111 However, as of the issuance of this financing order, the Commission has not issued its report and order in that rate case.

81. Applying Evergy West’s long-term debt rate shares the cost of extraordinary events between ratepayers and shareholders. Whereas applying Evergy’s WACC insulates Evergy West from risk from an unanticipated event like Winter Storm Uri, and places more risk on ratepayers.112

82. Public Counsel contends that carrying costs should not be recovered at Evergy West’s long-term cost of debt because Evergy West anticipates carrying Winter Storm Uri extraordinary costs for less than two years.113 Public Counsel also asserts that Evergy West’s long term debt rate is inappropriate because it is premised on Evergy West’s cost of long-term debt from June 30, 2018.114

 

109 

Reed Surrebuttal, Ex. 18, Page 28-29, Lines 19-23, 1-5.

110 

Bolin Rebuttal, Ex. 100, Page 4, Lines 3-6.

111 

Murray Surrebuttal, Ex. 204, Page 3, Lines 16-18.

112 

Bolin Rebuttal, Ex. 100, Page 7, Lines 8-11.

113 

Murray Rebuttal, Ex. 203, Page 5, Lines 6-14.

114 

Murray Surrebuttal, Ex. 204, Page 2, Lines 18-19.

 

41


83. For accounting purposes, an obligation longer than 364 days is typically considered long-term.115 Using Evergy West’s long-term debt rate to determine carrying costs is more appropriate than using Evergy West’s short-term debt rate, because more than a year has elapsed since Winter Storm Uri.116 Evergy West has been carrying the Winter Storm Uri costs on its books since February 2021.

84. Evergy West’s Commission-approved long-term debt rate is more appropriate to use than the WACC because this securitization addresses fuel and purchased power costs, not capital costs normally included in rate base, such as plant.117

85. The amount of carrying costs calculated by Staff’s financial expert, Mark Davis, using Evergy West’s long-term debt rate of 5.06 percent multiplies what it describes as the amount of normal deferral by the interim carrying cost divided by 12 for each month since February 2021.118

Conclusions of Law

Y. Section 393.1700.1(13), which defines “qualified extraordinary costs” for purposes of the securitization statute, specifically states that such costs include carrying charges. The statute does not further define carrying charges, nor clarify how they are to be calculated.

 

115 

Murray Rebuttal, Ex. 203, Page 9, Lines 3-5.

116 

Bolin Rebuttal, Ex. 100, Page 11, Lines 3-5.

117 

Bolin Rebuttal, Ex. 100, Page 7, Lines 6-8. Staff is discussing what its recommended carrying cost recovery rate would be for an AAO, but the same reasoning applies to securitization.

118 

Davis Confidential Workpapers, Ex. 107C, Ducera 15 Yr Sec and Ducera 20 Yr Sec tabs.

 

42


Decision

The Commission believes that Staff’s proposal and method to calculate carrying costs for Winter Storm Uri related costs at Evergy West’s long-term debt rate of 5.06 percent is most appropriate because the costs to be securitized are not capital costs. Further, the use of the long-term debt rate shares the risks of extraordinary events between Evergy West and its ratepayers. Public Counsel’s proposal to use short-term debt rates for the purposes of calculating carrying costs is inappropriate as the term to which the short-term debt rate, compounded monthly, would be applied is a period greater than 364 days and closer to two years.

L) What is the appropriate adjustment to the amount of Winter Storm Uri costs to be recovered through securitized bonds, if any, regarding Evergy West’s administration of the Special Incremental Load (SIL) tariff?

Findings of Fact

86. Staff proposes disallowing $1,231,553,119 prior to applying any jurisdictional allocation, from the securitization amount related to the implementation of the SIL tariff.

87. The Commission approved Evergy West’s SIL tariff in File No. EO-2019-0244.120 The purpose of the SIL tariff is to provide customers who smelt aluminum and primary metals, produce or fabricate steel, or operate a facility in excess of a monthly demand of 50 megawatts, with a rate not based on Evergy West’s cost of service, but that is designed to recover no less than the incremental costs of serving the new load.121

 

119 

Transcript, Page 303, Line 3, corrected amount.

120 

Luebbert Rebuttal, Ex. 105, Page 2, Footnote 1.

121 

Luebbert Rebuttal, Ex. 105, Pages 5-6, Lines 21-23, 1-8.

 

43


88. Nucor is engaged in the manufacture of steel and steel products. It constructed a “micro mill” in Sedalia, Missouri, which utilizes an electric arc furnace to recycle scrap steel into steel rebar.122

89. Nucor receives electric service from Evergy West through the SIL Rate Contract and Schedule SIL-1, which contains rates specific to Nucor’s service.123

90. As part of the Non-Unanimous Stipulation and Agreement in File No. EO-2019-0244, (Nucor Stipulation) Evergy West agreed to identify and isolate costs attributable to providing service to Nucor. Evergy West also agreed to modify its FAC accounting to ensure Nucor related costs are not included in the FAC customer charge.124 Evergy West did not identify Customer Event Balancing events, quantify the cost impacts of the events, or remove those costs from its securitization request.125

91. Evergy West did not determine or estimate the next-day Nucor hourly load from which cost impacts on non-Nucor ratepayers could be determined. As a result of not quantifying those events additional costs were included in Evergy West’s securitization request, which it agreed to remove prior to non-Nucor ratepayer recovery.126

92. Staff contends that Evergy West’s imprudent implementation of the Schedule SIL tariff in combination with the Nucor Stipulation resulted in additional costs to non-Nucor ratepayers through Evergy West’s FAC that were subsequently included in Evergy West’s securitization request.

 

122 

Luebbert Rebuttal, Ex. 105, Page 5, Lines 14-18.

123 

Luebbert Rebuttal, Ex. 105, Page 5, Lines 20-21.

124 

Luebbert Rebuttal, Ex. 105, Schedule JL-r2, Non-Unanimous Stipulation and Agreement, EO-2019-0244, Pages 3-4.

125 

Luebbert Rebuttal, Ex. 105, Page 4, Lines 3-7.

126 

Luebbert Rebuttal, Ex. 105, Page 4, Lines 7-12.

 

44


93. Staff raised the concerns related to treatment of the incremental costs to serve Nucor on May 12, 2022 in a Staff filed complaint in File No. EC-2022-0315.127

94. An exact quantification of an amount necessary to insulate non-Nucor ratepayers is problematic, because Evergy West has not retained the data necessary to determine the hours in which payments were due.128

95. Pursuant to the Nucor Stipulation, Evergy West agreed to hold non-Nucor customers harmless from any deficit in revenues caused by customers served under the SIL tariff.129

96. Evergy West contends that no costs have been purposely or inadvertently passed to other customers.130

97. Nucor has a highly variable load factor and its variations can undermine advance load planning, including hour to hour planning.131 Staff used a range of static value to represent the Nucor load, which is not based on Nucor operations.132

98. Evergy West’s day-ahead commitments included provisions for Nucor based on Nucor’s previous years load. A portion of Evergy West’s load forecast includes the Nucor load, and Evergy West can conservatively estimate that Nucor’s load from 365 days prior to the operating day is included in the Evergy West load forecast, adjusted for Nucor starting operations in March 2020.133

 

127 

Luebbert Rebuttal, Ex. 105, Page 14, Lines 12-15

128 

Luebbert Rebuttal, Ex. 105, Page 3, Lines 13-16.

129 

Luebbert Rebuttal, Ex. 105, Page 6, Lines 12-13.

130 

Lutz Surrebuttal, Ex. 16, Page 16, Lines 1-3.

131 

Lutz Surrebuttal, Ex. 16, Page 12, Lines 1-15.

132 

Carlson Surrebuttal, Ex. 2, Page 3, Lines 12-17.

133 

Carlson Surrebuttal, Ex. 2, Page 5, Lines 1-12.

 

45


99. At the time of development of the SIL tariff and the stipulation, Evergy West was unaware of the difficulty in obtaining Nucor load projections appropriate for daily forecasting.134

100. Evergy West’s analysis concludes that Nucor’s load did not negatively impact non-Nucor ratepayers. It was more beneficial to purchase all of Nucor’s load in the real time market, as opposed to the day ahead market in February 2021.135

Conclusions of Law

Z. Section 393.1700.1 (19), RSMo, defines a special contract as an electrical service provided under the terms of a special incremental load rate schedule at a fixed price rate approved by the commission.

AA. Section 393.1700.1 (16), RSMo, excludes from the definition of SUTC customers receiving electrical service under special contracts as of August 28, 2021, who are not subject to the securitized utility tariff charge.

Decision

Staff asks the Commission to reduce the qualified extraordinary costs by approximately $1.2 million for Evergy West’s imprudent implementation of the SIL tariff.

Evergy West asserts that an adjustment to the amount of qualified extraordinary cost for Winter Storm Uri is not warranted because the revenue received from Nucor under the SIL tariff is sufficient to cover its cost of service, and because it was served in the real-time SPP market during Winter Storm Uri. Evergy West also states that Staff’s method of calculating the Nucor impact is flawed. Evergy West also asserts that it has already agreed to keep certain records, identify costs, and other items as part of the August 30, 2022, Stipulation and Agreement in File No. ER-2022-0130, which occurred after the evidentiary hearing in this case. Thus, Evergy West argues, there is no support for the Commission to require those conditions in this case.

 

134 

Lutz Surrebuttal, Ex. 16, Pages 12-13, Lines 4-15, 1-8.

135 

Carlson Surrebuttal, Ex. 2, Page 6, Lines 8-16.

 

46


Staff argues that Evergy West failed to determine or estimate the next day Nucor hourly load for comparison to actual Nucor load to determine ratepayer impacts. Yet, Staff states that there are difficulties in quantifying the impact to non-Nucor customer of serving Nucor’s load in February 2021, largely due to a lack of data retention by Evergy West. Staff has filed a complaint against Evergy West in File No. EC-2022-0315 for the purpose of addressing any potential violations of the Nucor Stipulation.

Nucor is currently the only customer of its kind that Evergy West serves under the SIL tariff. It appears that Evergy West may have underestimated what would be involved with tracking the Nucor load. At this time there is insufficient evidence for the Commission to determine that non-Nucor customers were harmed. There is also insufficient evidence to quantify any potential harm.

Pursuant to the Nucor Stipulation, Evergy West has agreed to hold non-Nucor customers harmless from any deficit in revenues caused by serving the Nucor load. The Commission is unable to determine at this time whether Evergy West’s implementation of the SIL tariff was imprudent, and this is not the proper proceeding to determine if Evergy West has violated the Nucor Stipulation. It is appropriate that any determination regarding the Nucor Stipulation be addressed in the complaint proceeding. The hold harmless provision of the Nucor Stipulation will prevent ratepayers from being harmed from any Winter Storm Uri costs from service to Nucor being improperly applied to non-Nucor customers. Therefore, the Commission will not reduce the qualified extraordinary cost amount for Evergy West’s administration of the SIL tariff.

 

47


M) What is the appropriate discount rate or rates to use to calculate the net present value of Winter Storm Uri costs that would be recovered through customary ratemaking?

Findings of Fact

101. The Securitization Law requires an analysis of the net present value (NPV) of benefits to customers with and without securitization.136 The Securitization Law does not define NPV.137

102. The discount rate for a NPV analysis is the rate used to discount estimated future cash flows to the present. The determination of a reasonable discount rate is defined by the risk of the cash flows, the interval of the cash flows, and the term of the cash flows. The appropriate discount rate should be commensurate with the risk and term of the investment.138

103. Evergy West analyzed the NPV benefit to customers by comparing securitization to the recovery methods of Evergy West’s FAC and deferral under Section 393.1400, RSMo, plant-in-service accounting, and deferral to a regulatory asset through an AAO.139

104. Evergy West used its WACC of 8.9 percent for the discount rate in determining the NPV benefit to customers for securitization when compared to customary ratemaking.140 Evergy West contends that this is the correct rate because it committed capital to funding the deferred fuel cost collections that are the subject of this securitization, and that warrants a reasonable return until such time as that capital is paid off by the proceeds from securitization.141

 

136 

Section 393.1700.2(3)(c)b RSMo.

137 

Murray Rebuttal, Ex. 203, Page 11, Lines 19-20.

138 

Murray Rebuttal, Ex. 203, Page 12, Lines 6-13.

139 

Klote Surrebuttal, Ex. 12, Page 3, Lines 7-19.

140 

Klote Surrebuttal, Ex. 12, Page 15, Lines 1-6, and Confidential Schedule RAK-8.

 

48


105. Evergy West analyzed NPV outcomes for Securitization, the FAC, and a 15-year amortization, using the same 8.9 percent discount rate.142

106. Staff’s expert financial witness, Mark Davis’ analysis compares a discount rate range of 5.06 percent and 8.9 percent for customary ratemaking. Staff analyzed NPV outcomes for securitization, the FAC, and deferral through an AAO, using the same discount rate range of 5.06 percent to 8.9 percent.143 107. Public Counsel’s analysis used a different discount rate for securitization than it applied to customary methods of ratemaking to yield its NPV calculations.144 This is different than how both Staff and Evergy’s financial experts analyzed NPV for securitization when compared to customary ratemaking.

108. Use of Evergy West’s short-term debt rate is inappropriate because the amount of time Evergy’s capital will be deployed exceeds one year.145

Conclusions of Law

BB. Section 393. 1700.2(3)(c)b requires that this financing order make a finding that the proposed securitization is expected to “provide quantifiable net present value benefits to customers” as compared to recovery of those costs without the issuance of the securitized bonds. In order to make that comparison, the Commission must determine the appropriate discount rate to be used in the calculations of the amounts that would be recovered without securitization.

 

141 

Reed Surrebuttal, Ex. 18, Page 7, Lines 14-26.

142 

Klote Surrebuttal, Ex. 12, Confidential Schedule RAK-8.

143 

Davis Rebuttal, Ex.106, Page 6 Line 20 through Page 7, Line 5; and Confidential workpapers of expert witness Davis, Ex. 107C.

144 

Murray Rebuttal, Ex. 203, Page 13, Lines 3-21.

145 

Reed Surrebuttal, Ex. 18, Page 7, Lines 22-24.

 

49


CC. Section 393. 1700.2(2)(e), RSMo, requires Evergy West to provide a comparison between the NPV of the cost to customers that is estimated to result from the issuance of securitized utility tariff bonds and the costs that would result from the application of the customary method of financing; and reflecting the qualified extraordinary costs in retail customer rates. The comparison must show that securitization would provide a quantifiable NPV benefit to customers.

Decision

This issue simply asks what discount rate should be plugged into a formula to determine whether securitization would be a quantifiable NPV benefit to Evergy West’s customers. It does not have a direct impact on the amount that Evergy West should be allowed to recover through securitization. The Commission determines the appropriate discount rate to use in calculating the NPV of Winter Storm Uri costs that would be recovered through customary ratemaking is to use Evergy West’s long-term debt rate of 5.06 percent.

2) What are the estimated up-front and ongoing financing costs associated with securitizing qualified extraordinary costs associated with Winter Storm Uri?

A) What is the appropriate return on investment and treatment of earnings in the capital subaccount?

B) Is the issuance of multiple series appropriate?

The Commission will address this issue and sub-issues together.

 

50


Findings of Fact

109. Up-front and ongoing financing costs of securitization are comprised of a mix of costs that are fixed and less dependent on the size of the transaction, and costs that are variable and tied to the size, length, and execution complexity of the transaction.146

110. The up-front financing costs consist of items such as underwriter fees, legal fees, and rating agency fees. The Commission advisor’s costs, including Staff’s advisors, would also go into the issuance.147

111. The ongoing financing costs are amounts that would be collected every period through the SUTC and would include items such as the servicer cost, administrative fees, accounting fees, and ongoing rating agency fees.148

112. Evergy West estimates that the up-front financing cost associated with securitizing the Winter Storm Uri costs is $6.6 million ($6,639,758)149, Evergy West includes $300,000 for Commission advisors.150 Evergy West estimated the ongoing financing costs to be approximately $560,000 per year. 151

 

146 

Davis Rebuttal, Ex 106, Page 6, Lines 3-6.

147 

Transcript, Page 483, Lines 17-22. A more complete list of up-front costs is included in confidential Schedule JOH-1 attached to Humphrey’s Direct Testimony, Ex. 6.

148 

Transcript, Pages 483-484, Lines 23-25, 1-3. A more complete list of ongoing costs is included in confidential Schedule JOH-1 attached to Humphrey’s Direct Testimony, Ex. 6.

149 

Klote Surrebuttal, Ex. 12, Page 14, Table 1.

150 

Transcript, Page 106, Lines 8-11.

151 

Humphrey Direct, Ex. 6, Page 11, Lines 11-17.

 

51


113. Staff estimates up-front financing costs to be $6,025,325 plus the Commission’s advisor costs.152 Staff recommends a lower amount of up-front financing than Evergy West due to reallocation of some costs from fixed costs to variable costs and due to an assumption of a lower securitized amount.153 Evergy West’s witness Jason Humphrey examined Staff’s workpapers, and is of the opinion that the reduced up-front financing amount may be related to a reduction in Staff’s overall securitized amount.154

114. Staff estimates the ongoing financing costs to be $508,905 per year. Similar to the estimated up-front financing costs calculation, Staff reallocated some costs from Evergy’s estimated ongoing financing costs from fixed costs to variable costs to more appropriately calculate the costs.155

115. The issuance advice letter will indicate the pricing, terms, and conditions of the bonds, as well as provide actual amounts for the total up-front financing costs and the best available estimate of total ongoing financing costs.156

116. It is customary to include up-front financing costs in the principal amount of securitized utility tariff bonds.157

117. IRS rules require Evergy West to contribute an amount equal to 0.5 percent of the initial aggregate principal amount of the Securitization Bonds to the SPE in the form of a capital contribution that the SPE maintains in a capital account.158

118. Evergy West asserts that it is entitled to a return on the capital contribution at its authorized WACC, 8.9 percent.159

 

152 

Bolin Surrebuttal, Ex. 101, Page 6, Table 1; Exhibit 107C, Davis confidential workpapers, Sheet MD3 Bond Financing Costs; Staff’s Proposed Financing Order, Appendix C – Estimated Up-Front Financing Costs Table; and Staff’s initial brief (public version) Page 16

153 

Exhibit 107, Davis confidential workpapers, Sheet MD3 Bond Financing Costs

154 

Humphrey Surrebuttal, Ex. 7, Page 5, Lines 14-23.

155 

Exhibit 107, Davis confidential workpapers, Sheet MD3 Bond Financing Costs

156 

Lunde Direct, Ex. 13, Page 40, Lines 16-18.

157 

Davis Rebuttal, Ex. 106, Page 7, Lines 17-19.

158 

Klote Direct, Ex. 11, Page 22, Lines 7-11.

159 

Klote Direct, Ex. 11, Page 22, Lines 11-14.

 

52


119. Staff takes issue with allowing Evergy West to earn a return on investment and earnings in the capital subaccount at 8.9 percent because Evergy West’s most recently Commission determined WACC is derived from Evergy West’s 2018 rate case, File No. ER-2018-0146. Staff proposes that the Commission use a WACC of 6.77 percent approved as part of ER-2019-0374 for The Empire District Electric Company d/b/a Liberty, as a proxy.160

120. It is uncommon for securitization bonds to be issued in multiple series.161

121. Evergy contends that multiple series are not expected, but that the financing order should permit the issuance of multiple series to address any future market disruptions.162

122. Issuance of securitization bonds in multiple series would likely result in an increased cost of issuance.163

Conclusions of Law

DD. Section 393. 1700.2(3)(c)a, RSMo, requires the Commission to include in a financing order a description and estimate of the amount of financing costs that may be recovered through securitized utility tariff charges.

EE. Section 393.1700.2(3)(c)l. RSMo, requires the Commission to include in a financing order:

A procedure that shall allow the electrical corporation to earn a return, at the cost of capital authorized from time to time by the commission in the electrical corporation’s rate proceedings, on any moneys advanced by the electrical corporation to fund reserves, if any, or capital accounts established under the terms of any indenture, ancillary agreement, or other financing documents pertaining to the securitized utility tariff bonds.

 

160 

This argument was proposed in Staff’s initial brief, but there is no testimony or record evidence supporting Staff’s position.

161 

Transcript, Page 441, Lines 21-22.

162 

Transcript, Page 127, Lines 1-17.

163 

Transcript, Page 441-446.

 

53


FF. Section 393. 1700.2(3)(c)e RSMo, requires the Commission to include in a financing order:

A formula-based true-up mechanism for making, at least annually, expeditious periodic adjustments in the securitized utility tariff charges that customers are required to pay pursuant to the financing order and for making any adjustments that are necessary to correct for any overcollection or undercollection of the charges or to otherwise ensure the timely payment of securitized utility tariff bonds and financing costs and other required amounts and charges payable under the securitized utility tariff bonds.

GG. A list of items meeting the definition of “financing costs” is found at Section 393. 1700.1(8), RSMo.

HH. Section 393. 1700.1(16), RSMo includes “financing costs” as items that may be included in a “securitized utility tariff charge.” Subsection 393. 1700.1(8)(f) authorizes the Commission to employ financial advisors and legal counsel to assist it in processing a financing application and to include the associated costs as financing costs.

Decision

The Securitization Law requires only an estimate of financing costs. The final financing costs will not be known until the securitization bonds are issued. Evergy West’s estimate of $6.6 million for the up-front financing costs only includes $300,000 for the Commission Staff advisors, which is insufficient to cover those costs. Staff includes no discernible amount for Commission Staff advisors, as Staff states those amounts would be borne by Evergy West regardless of whether securitization was granted. Staff estimates $6 million plus the cost for the Commission’s advisors as its up-front financing costs without a specific amount for the Commission’s advisors. The Commission finds that Staff’s methodology for determining the estimated up-front financing costs and the

 

54


estimated ongoing financing costs is more appropriate. Therefore, the Commission finds the appropriate estimate of up-front financing cost of approximately $6 million plus the cost of the Commission’s advisors reflects an estimate of all of the costs that could be incurred. The Commission will use approximately $508,905 per year in estimated ongoing financing costs. As stated above, these amounts will be finally known at the issuance of the securitization bonds.

The Commission finds that Evergy West’s WACC of 8.9 percent to be the only viable option the parties presented that meets the securitization statutory requirements for an appropriate return on investment and treatment of earnings in the capital subaccount.

Due to the potentiality of multiple series resulting in additional costs, the Commission finds that the issuance of multiple series is not appropriate. The Commission will authorize the issuance of one series of securitized utility tariff bonds.

3) Would issuance of securitized utility tariff bonds and imposition of securitized utility tariff charges provide quantifiable net present value benefits to customers as compared to recovery of the securitized utility tariff costs that would be incurred absent the issuance of bonds?

Findings of Fact

123. In its direct testimony, filed along with its application, Evergy calculated a NPV benefit to customers ranging between $64.5 million and $121.3 million from securitizing qualified extraordinary costs.164

 

164 

Klote Direct, Ex. 11, Page 14, Lines 10-20; Schedule RAK-4

 

55


124. At a securitization term of 15 years and a discount rate range of 8.9 percent and 5.06 percent, the implied NPV benefit of securitization would range from approximately $55 million to $67 million when compared to the FAC; and approximately $8 to $19 million when compared to deferral through an AAO.165

125. At a securitization term of 15 years and a discount rate of 5.06 percent, the implied NPV benefit of securitization would provide a net present value benefit when compared to customary recovery through Evergy West’s FAC.166

Conclusions of Law

II. Section 393.1700.2(3)(c)b requires that this Financing Order include:

A finding that the proposed issuance of securitized utility tariff bonds and the imposition and collection of a securitized utility tariff charge are just and reasonable and in the public interest and are expected to provide quantifiable net present value benefits to customers as compared to recovery of the components of securitized utility tariff costs that would have been incurred absent the issuance of securitized utility tariff bonds. …

The Securitization Law does not require this Financing Order to include a quantification of the amount of savings. Rather, it simply requires a finding that there will be expected savings.

Decision

Based on the calculations prepared by Evergy West and Staff, the Commission finds that the proposed issuance of securitized utility tariff bonds are expected to provide quantifiable net present value benefits to customers as compared to the recovery of the components of securitized utility tariff costs that would have been incurred absent the issuance of securitized utility tariff bonds. This conclusion remains true despite the Commission’s decisions to use inputs that differ from those proposed by the parties, as demonstrated in the multiple scenarios described by Staff.

 

165 

Davis Rebuttal, Ex. 106, Pages 6-7, Lines 22-26, 1-4; Ex. 107, Davis confidential work papers, Worksheet MD_1

166 

Ex. 107, Davis confidential work papers, Worksheet MD_1

 

56


A) What is the appropriate discount rate to use to calculate net present value of securitized utility tariff costs that would be recovered for Winter Storm Uri through securitization?

Findings of Fact

126. A principle of discounting future cash flows is to use a discount rate consistent with the risk of those cash flows. The certainty of payments under securitization necessitates a lower discount rate than under other ratemaking scenarios.167

127. Evergy West proposes using its WACC for reasons addressed in the findings of fact for issue 1, sub-issue M.

128. Evergy West contends that the only appropriate discount rate to use is the same rate that it used to build the cost streams in each of the net present value scenarios (FAC and AAO). Evergy West used its WACC of 8.9 percent because that is the cost of capital that is used in setting its rates.168

129. Additional discount rates have been analyzed in other instances, other than just a utility’s WACC. Some of those discount rates include the cost of securitization, a utility’s cost of debt, and the cost of consumer borrowing. There is no single discount rate that applies uniformly to all customers. 169

130. Staff’s expert financial witness, Mark Davis, evaluated a range of discount rates to evaluate the net present value to customers, including Evergy West’s long-term cost of debt rate of 5.06 percent to Evergy West’s WACC of 8.9 percent.170

Conclusions of Law

There are no additional conclusions of law for this issue.

 

167 

Murray Rebuttal, Ex. 203, Page 14, Lines 11-13.

168 

Reed Surrebuttal, Ex. 18, Pages 29-30, Lines 23-24, 1-8.

169 

Davis Rebuttal, Ex. 106, Pages 4-5, Lines 20-22, 1-6.

170 

Ex. 107C, confidential workpapers of Mark Davis.

 

57


Decision

A discount rate of 5.06 percent is commensurate with the risk involved in securitization, which is quite low. Evergy West’s 8.9 percent is not appropriate because these costs are operational. The Commission finds that the 5.06 percent long-term debt rate is an appropriate discount rate.

B) What is the appropriate term and coupon rate for securitization of qualified extraordinary costs related to Winter Storm Uri?

Findings of fact

131. Evergy West proposes that the bonds be issued with a term of 15 years and a legal maturity date of 17 years. The legal maturity date exists to provide rating agencies and investors comfort that there would not be default if there is under collection of the principal amount of the bonds, and provides additional time to pay off the bonds in such an event.171

132. If the Commission authorized recovery of Winter Storm Uri costs through an AAO, Staff would recommend an amortization period of at least 15 years due to the magnitude of the costs.172

133. Evergy West’s direct filing assumed the weighted average coupon rate of securitization estimated to be 3.427 percent. Evergy West revised its coupon rate in surrebuttal based upon recent significant increases in rates. Evergy West’s updated weighted average coupon rate is 4.5 percent.173

 

171 

Transcript, Pages 446-447, Lines 20-25, 1-21,

172 

Bolin Rebuttal, Ex. 100, Pages 6-7, Lines 16-23, 1-2.

173 

Lunde Surrebuttal, Ex. 14, Page 2, Lines 7-20, Based on updated cashflows from July 8, 2022.

 

58


134. The Federal Reserve recently increased interest rates by 75 basis points and has indicated that there could be more increases this year. Evergy West’s expert witness ran a break-even analysis which demonstrated that even with a 4.5 percent coupon rate there was still another couple of percentage points of rate increase where securitization showed a better net present value to customers. Evergy West’s analysis showed that securitization up to very high coupon rates was still the best method of recovery.174

135. Evergy West’s analysis showed a maximum break-even interest rate for securitization of 9.72 percent compared to an AAO and 6.986 percent compared to Evergy West’s FAC based on an 8.9 percent discount rate and 8.9 percent weighted average coupon rate for the AAO and FAC NPV calculations.175

136. The break-even interest rate calculated in Evergy West’s surrebuttal would be lower if a 5.06 interest rate was use for both the carrying costs and discount rate.176

137. Staff’s net present value benefit analysis was based on updated estimated coupon rates of 4.5 percent and 5.0 percent.177

138. The precise terms and conditions of the proposed securitization, such as interest rates, will not be known until just prior to the sale.178

139. Considering the actual demand for the securitization bonds on the day of pricing, the underwriter will agree to purchase the securitization bonds at defined prices and coupon rates.179

 

174 

Transcript, Pages 104-105, Lines 12-25, 1-19.

175 

Transcript, Page 456, Lines 7-13.

176 

Transcript, Page 456, Lines 17-25.

177 

Davis Rebuttal, Ex. 106, Page 6 Line 23.

178 

Lunde Direct, Ex. 13, Page 16, Lines14-15; and Page 23, Line 19 to Page 20, Line 2.

179 

Lunde Direct, Ex. 13, Page 30, Lines 15-20.

 

59


Conclusions of Law

JJ. Section 393. 1700.2(3)(c)c. RSMo requires the Commission find that the proposed structuring and pricing of the securitization bonds are reasonably expected to result in the lowest securitized utility tariff charges consistent with market conditions at the time the securitization bonds are priced and the terms of the financing order.

Decision

Evergy West’s direct filing assumed a weighted average coupon rate of 3.427 percent, but the Federal Reserve has raised rates twice since that direct filing, affecting bond rates. Staff revaluated the net present value benefits calculation using a coupon rate range of 4.5 percent to 5.0 percent, reflecting movements in the benchmark treasury rate informing bond pricing. The coupon rate will ultimately be updated prior to the submission of the issuance advice letter because it is based on the investors’ required return to purchase the securitization bonds. Therefore, the Commission will direct Evergy West to update the net present value benefit calculation, as part of their issuance advice letter, to demonstrate savings of the final bond condition as part of the issuance advice letter.

Evergy West has proposed a 15-year bond term with a final legal maturity date of 17 years. No party has opposed a 15-year term for the bonds. The Commission finds that a 15-year term with a final legal maturity date of 17 years is reasonable, and approves that term for the securitization bonds.

 

60


4) How should securitized utility tariff charges be allocated?

Findings of Fact

140. The SUTC is applicable to all existing or future retail customers receiving electrical service from the electrical corporation or its successors or assignees under commission-approved rate schedules, except for customers receiving electrical service under special contracts as of August 28, 2021.180

141. Evergy West’s FAC recovers costs from customers based upon energy consumption adjusted for loss (loss-adjusted energy sales).181

142. Evergy West originally proposed allocating the SUTC based upon the customer class revenue allocations adopted by the Commission in File No. ER-2018-0146. 182

143. Allocating the SUTC by customer class could produce unreasonable results in its own operation, and potentially contribute to rate switching. As a class grows that class’s customers will pay a lower SUTC. If a large customer changed rate schedules or ceased service that could result in fluctuations in customer bills within the subject classes.183

144. Winter Storm Uri costs consist primarily of fuel and purchased power costs that would typically be recovered through the FAC. Through the FAC, the net costs are recovered from customers on the basis of energy consumption, as adjusted for losses. Staff’s recommended approach would be for the SUTC to be recovered from all applicable customers on the basis of loss-adjustment energy sales.184

 

180 

Lange Rebuttal, Ex. 104, Page 6, Lines 1-5.

181 

Lange Rebuttal, Ex. 104, Page 20, Lines 1-8.

182 

Lutz Direct, Ex. 15, Page 8 Line 15 to Page 9 Line 2; and Page 9, Figure 1

183 

Lange Rebuttal, Ex. 104, Page 14, Lines 2-6.

 

61


145. Staff’s loss-adjusted energy sales recovery eliminates the SUTC volatility associated with rate-switching, mitigates the SUTC volatility associated with customers leaving the system, mitigates the SUTC volatility associated with customer growth, and will smooth potential variation in the SUTC in place over time.185

146. Under Evergy’s class allocation methodology, new customers served in the newly-promulgated EV and MKT rate schedules, as well as existing CCN customers, would be billed $0.00/kWh; which is not consistent with the nonbypassability requirements of the Securitization Law.186

147. Under Staff’s recommended approach, new customers under the newly-promulgated EV and MKT rate schedules would be billed the same rate as other customers served at the same level of distribution services.187

148. Evergy West in its surrebuttal agreed with Staff that the SUTC should be allocated to Evergy West’s customers based upon loss-adjusted energy sales since it is consistent with the FAC.188

Conclusions of Law

KK. Section 393.1700.2(3))(c)h, RSMo requires this financing order to determine “how securitized utility tariff charges will be allocated among retail customer classes.”

 

184 

Lange Rebuttal, Ex. 104, Page 20 Lines 6-13

185 

Lange Rebuttal, Ex. 104, Page 15, lines 6-11.

186 

Lange Rebuttal, Ex. 104, Page 20 Line 20 to Page 21 Line 3.

187 

Lange Rebuttal, Ex. 104, Page 20 Lines 14-19

188 

Lutz Surrebuttal, Ex. 16, Page 3, Lines 1-19

 

62


LL. The Commission has much discretion in determining the theory or method it uses in determining rates189 and can make pragmatic adjustments called for by particular circumstances.190

MM. Cost-allocation is a discretionary determination frequently delegated to an expert administrative agency such as the Commission. In that regard, the Missouri Court of Appeals quoted approvingly the United States Supreme Court as saying “[a]llocation of costs is not a matter for the slide-rule. It involves judgment on a myriad of fact. It has no claim to an exact science.”191

NN. The definition of “securitized utility tariff charge” found at Section 393.1700.1(16) indicates that such charge is nonbypassable.

Decision

Both MECG and Velvet advocated strongly for allocation by customer class, as contained in Evergy West’s direct filing. MECG argues that the appropriate allocation method is the one adopted by the Commission in Evergy West’s 2018 rate case, File No. ER-2018-0146. MECG also asserts that allocation method is consistent with the Securitization Law, and more closely aligns Winter Storm Uri costs by cost causation.

 

189 

State ex rel. Public Counsel v. Public Service Com’n, 274 S.W.3d 569, 586 (Mo. App. 2009).

190 

State ex rel. U.S. Water/Lexington v. Missouri Public Service Com’n 795 S.W.2d 593, 597 (Mo. App. 1990)

191 

Spire Missouri, Inc. v. Missouri Public Service Com’n 607 S.W.3d 759, 771 (Mo. App. 2020), quoting National Ass’n of Greeting Card Publishers v. U.S. Postal Service, 462 U.S. 810, 103 S.Ct 2727, 77 L.Ed. 2d 195 (1983). That decision was quoting an earlier United State Supreme Court decision, Colorado Interstate Gas Co. v. Federal Power Commission, 324 U.S. 581, 589, 65 S.Ct. 829, 833, 89 L.Ed. 1206 (1945).

 

63


Both MECG and Velvet argue that allocation on an energy-based charge places recovery of Winter Storm Uri costs disproportionally on Evergy West’s largest customers. However, loss-adjusted allocations not only mirrors how cost recovery occurs under Evergy West’s FAC, but it also solves many of the problems involving recovery through securitization and conventional allocation by customer class. Allocations by class will change from one general rate case to another, but recovery through securitization is both nonbypassable and occurs over a 15-year time frame. Electrical companies have to file a general rate case to continue their FAC. Evergy West is required to come to the Commission for a rate case every four years if it wishes to continue its FAC.192 There will most likely be several Evergy West rate cases prior to complete recovery of Winter Storm Uri costs through securitization, and it is highly likely that there will be some changes to Evergy West’s class cost allocations over 15 years. Allocation by loss-adjusted energy sales ensures that even if class cost allocations change in a rate case it will not shift ratepayer’s responsibility for recovery of Winter Storm Uri costs from one customer to another, or encourage customers to migrate to another rate schedule.

The proposal to allocate costs on the basis of loss-adjusted energy sales is appropriate, and that allocation methodology will be implemented.

5) What, if any, additions or changes should be made to the Storm Securitized Utility Tariff Rider proposed by Evergy West?

Findings of Fact

149. Evergy West submitted an exemplar Securitized Utility Tariff Rider as part of its direct filing. Evergy’s exemplar tariff referenced the Financing Order for details on the SUTC and included a table of the monthly billing rate for each rate class.193

 

192 

P.S.C. MO. No. 1, Original Sheet No. 127.13.

193 

Lutz Direct, Ex. 15, Schedule BDL-1, Exemplar Securitized Utility Tariff Rider.

 

64


150. Staff witness, Lange, noted that Evergy West’s exemplar Securitized Utility Tariff Rider did not reasonably accommodate implementation of any financing order issued in this case.194

151. The exemplar tariff did not contain elements and other language that Staff thought should be included in a Securitized Utility Tariff Rider, such as a true-mechanism; nonbypassability of the SUTC for retail customers; how the SUTC should appear on customer’s bills; or an approach for allocation of late and partial payments. 195

152. It is best practice for applicable mechanisms from the financing order to be reflected in the tariff to mitigate the need to reference external sources when executing the tariff.196

153. Evergy submitted a revised tariff addressing some of Staff’s comments.197 Most of Staff’s issues were resolved in Evergy’s revised tariff.198

154. Staff witness Lange and Evergy West witness Lutz worked together to design a Securitized Utility Tariff Rider in support of the Non-Unanimous Stipulation and Agreement submitted in this case, which was included in a Specimen Exemplar Tariff. The first five pages of that exhibit contain the language that Staff deems necessary199 for a Securitized Utility Tariff Rider to contain.200

Conclusions of Law

There are no additional conclusions of law for this issue.

 

194 

Lange Rebuttal, Ex. 104, Page 4, Lines 12-16.

195 

Lange Rebuttal, Ex. 104, Pages 4-18 and Transcript V3 Pages 365-371

196 

Lange Rebuttal, Ex. 104, Page 14, Lines 41-43.

197 

Lutz Surrebuttal, Ex. 16, Schedule BDL-3

198 

Transcript V3, Pages 369-371

199 

Staff’s initial brief at page 21, and Staff’s reply brief at page 11. Evergy West Reply brief at page 33.

200 

Ex. 108, Specimen Exemplar Tariff. Page six of the exemplar tariff contains the Securitized Revenue Requirement and Rate, but does not contain the input amounts approved by the Commission in this order.

 

65


Decision

Evergy West’s proposed exemplar Securitized Utility Tariff Rider, as submitted, did not contain the necessary elements to implement this financing order, and did not follow best practices so that it could be executed without referencing an external source such as this Financing Order. Exhibit 108, the Specimen Exemplar Tariff submitted by Staff, and developed by Staff witness Lange and Evergy West witness Lutz, addresses Staff’s issues concerning the tariff rider language, and has not been objected to by Evergy West or any other party.

The language in Exhibit 108, the Specimen Exemplar Tariff, is appropriate for the implementation of this financing order, independent of the calculations therein, which support the rejected Stipulation. The Commission finds that the changes included in that exhibit make the necessary changes to Evergy West’s exemplar tariff. The Commission will approve that tariff language in Exhibit 108 for use in the Securitized Utility Tariff Rider.

6) Regarding any designated staff representatives who may be advised by a financial advisor or advisors, what provision or procedures should the Commission order to implement the requirements of Section 393.1700.2(3)(h) RSMo?

7) What other conditions, if any, are appropriate and not inconsistent with Section 393.1700, RSMo, to be included in the financing order?

The Commission will address these two sub-issues together.

Findings of Fact

155. The Securitization Law authorizes the Commission, to designate in a financing order one or more Staff representatives and advisors to collaborate with the utility in the bond marketing process and to assist the Commission in evaluating the reasonableness of the pricing, terms and conditions of the securitized utility tariff bonds, and to ensure that securitization transactions provide quantifiable net present value benefits to a utility’s customers.201

 

66


156. Evergy West’s proposal for the Commission’s review is inadequate. Evergy West intends that the Commission only review the final amount as part of the issuance advice letter.202 The issuance advice letter is delivered to the Commission sometimes on the day of pricing but no later than the day following pricing.203 It would be troublesome if the designated Staff representative’s participation is limited to advising the Commission whether to approve or disapprove the issuance advice letter.204

157. Many details about the securitization bond’s costs are not known and will not be known until the bonds are ready to be issued. Commission Staff review of cost amounts prior to those costs being finalized is appropriate and provides a level of involvement that is beneficial to achieving the statutory net benefits objective.205

158. The Securitization Law does allow the Commission to reject the securitization by disapproving the issuance advice letter prior to noon on the fourth business day after the commission receives the issuance advice letter.206 However, if the Commission were to reject the issuance advice letter it would be catastrophic from a capital market perspective.207 Future attempts to implement a securitization could be negatively impacted.208 It is preferable that the Commission take whatever steps are

 

201 

Davis Rebuttal, Ex. 106, Page 8, Lines 7-11.

202 

Davis Rebuttal, Ex. 106, Page 8, Lines 14-16.

203 

Transcript, Page 115, Lines 17-20.

204 

Transcript, Page 486, Lines 15-19.

205 

Davis Rebuttal, Ex. 106, Page 8, Lines 11-13.

206 

Section 393. 1700.2(3)(h) RSMo.

207 

Transcript, Page 487, Lines 6-8.

208 

Transcript, Page 114, Lines 20-24.

 

67


necessary to limit the possibility that the issuance advice letter needs to be rejected.209 Ultimately what’s very important in the review process is making sure that the structure, marketing, and pricing are set up in a way where there’s no need to reject the issuance advice letter at the end of the process.210

159. A best practice is to establish a designated representative review process in advance of the issuance advice letter.211 Feedback from the Commission and Commission Staff throughout the marketing, structuring, and pricing process, with a review process established within the financing order best ensures the statutory net present value objective is achieved and minimizes the risk of the issuance advice letter ultimately being rejected.212 Thus, there is a need for interim review and the ability for Commission Staff to regularly update the Commission and transmit feedback as necessary.213

160. Other parties may not have an incentive to protect the interest of ratepayers, who are solely responsible for the cost of the financing.214 Therefore, the financing order should provide for the designated representative and its advisor, to be involved, provide input, and collaborate with Evergy West in all facets of the bond structuring, marketing, and pricing processes for the bonds, as well as the hiring of underwriters and other deal participants.215

 

209 

Transcript, Page 116, Lines 6-10.

210 

Transcript, Page 434, Lines 6-10.

211 

Transcript, Page 487, Lines 16-17.

212 

Davis Rebuttal, Ex. 106, Page 12, Lines 4-7.

213 

Davis Rebuttal, Ex. 106, Page 8, Lines 19-20.

214 

Davis Rebuttal, Ex. 106, Page 11, Lines 3-5.

215 

Davis Rebuttal, Ex. 106, Page 10, Lines 10-12.

 

68


161. Evergy West should have the flexibility to establish repayment schedules, coupons, financing costs, and other bond terms and conditions, so long as Commission Staff is provided the necessary ability to provide input and collaborate, and notify the Commission of any objections as necessary.216

162. In its proposed draft financing order, Staff included a section addressing the rights and responsibilities of a designated representative. Staff would advise the Commission to designate representatives from Commission staff, who will be advised by financial and other advisors, including outside counsel, to provide input to Evergy West and collaborate with it in all facets of the process to place the securitized utility tariff bonds to market, so the designated representative can provide the Commission with an opinion on the reasonableness of the bonds on an expedited basis. The designated Staff representatives would be given authority to “review all facets of the structuring, marketing and pricing bond processes.” Further, the designated representative would be allowed to “attend all meetings and participate in all calls, e-mails, and other communications relating to the structuring, marketing, pricing and issuance of the securitized utility tariff bonds.”217

Conclusions of Law

OO. Section 393.1700.2(3)(h) RSMo, provides that before securitization bonds are issued, the electrical corporation is required to provide an “issuance advice letter” to the Commission describing the final terms of the bonds. The Commission is allowed only until noon on the fourth business day after it receives the issuance advice letter to issue a disapproval letter directing that the bond issuance as proposed should not proceed.

 

216 

Davis Rebuttal, Ex. 106, Page 12, Lines 19-23.

217 

Staff’s draft Financing Order, Pages 20-22.

 

69


PP. So that the Commission will have sufficient insight into the bond placing process to be able to evaluate the issuance advice letter in the short amount of time allowed, Section 393.1700.2(3)(h), RSMo, gives the Commission authority to:

designate a representative or representatives from commission staff, who may be advised by a financial advisor or advisors contracted with the commission, to provide input to the electrical corporation and collaborate with the electrical corporation in all facets of the process undertaken by the electrical corporation to place the securitized utility tariff bonds to market so the commission’s representative or representatives can provide the commission with an opinion on the reasonableness of the pricing, terms, and conditions of the securitized utility tariff bonds on an expedited basis.

QQ. Section 393.1700.2(3)(h) also expressly limits the authority of the Commission’s representative or representatives, stating:

Neither the designated representative or representatives from the commission’s staff nor one or more financial advisors advising commission staff shall have authority to direct how the electrical corporation places the bonds to market although they shall be permitted to attend all meetings convened by the electrical corporation to address placement of the bonds to market.

RR. Importantly, Section 393.1700.2(3)(h) also allows the Commission to include provisions in the financing order “relating to the issuance advice letter process as the commission considers appropriate and as are not inconsistent with this section.”

SS. Section 393.1700.2(3)(a)b contemplates that the Commission may issue a financing order approving the petition “subject to conditions.”

TT. Section 393.1700.2(3)(c)c requires a financing order to include:

A finding that the proposed structuring and pricing of the securitized utility tariff bonds are reasonably expected to result in the lowest securitized utility tariff charges consistent with market conditions at the time the securitized utility tariff bonds are priced and the terms of the financing order.

 

70


Decision

This Securitization Law is a relatively new statute and this is only the third securitization petition to come before the Commission. The previous two cases were for one regulated utility and resulted in one financing order. So, this will be the Commission’s second financing order. The Commission necessarily has some concerns. Unlike other cases before the Commission, a financing order authorizes Evergy West to take the necessary steps to issue securitization bonds where the final interest coupon rate and total securitization amounts are unknown as of the issuance of this order.

The Commission’s only recourse if the issuance advice letter is unsatisfactory is to reject it by issuing a disapproval letter by noon of the fourth day following receipt of the issuance advice letter, directing that the bonds not be issued. Both Staff and Evergy West’s financial experts explained that option would be catastrophic from a capital market perspective. The Commission will not have any ability to modify or nullify the financing order or the securitization bonds once issued, and that is as it should be from a market perspective. In order to ensure the interest of the ratepayers are represented during the structuring, marketing and pricing phase, the Commission believes that Staff’s proposal to include one or more designated representatives from Staff, financial advisors, and outside counsel, (collectively “Finance Team”) is appropriate and within the bounds set by the Securitization Law. The Finance Team should be allowed to be involved in the process with the understanding that the Finance Team does not have authority to approve that process. Pursuant to the Securitization Law the Finance Team may review, provide input, collaborate, and report to the Commission. It is ultimately up to the Commission to approve the issuance of the securitization bonds.

 

71


To that end, the Commission will authorize the Finance Team to participate with Evergy West in the process of placing the securitization bonds to market. To ensure that the structuring and pricing of the securitized utility tariff bonds are reasonably expected to result in the lowest securitized utility tariff bond charges consistent with market conditions and the terms of this Financing Order, the Commission authorizes the Finance Team to review, provide input and oversight, and collaborate on the structuring, marketing and pricing of the securitized utility tariff bonds and related transaction documents. The costs of such Finance Team should constitute financing costs.

The Finance Team’s participation is not to interfere with the process of placing the bonds to market but to act as the Commission’s proxy in providing oversight and input on the transaction to confirm that the transaction provides quantifiable net present value benefits to customers compared to the use of traditional ratemaking and results in the lowest securitized utility tariff charges consistent with market conditions at the time the securitized utility tariff bonds are priced.

The Finance Team shall have the right to review, provide input, and collaborate on all facets of the structuring, marketing and pricing bond processes, including but not limited to, (1) the size, selection process, participants, allocations and economics of the underwriter and any other member of the syndicate group; (2) the structure of the bonds; (3) the bonds credit rating agency application; (4) the underwriters’ preparation, marketing and syndication of the bonds; (5) the pricing of the bonds and the certifications provided by Evergy West and the underwriters; (6) all associated costs, (including up front and ongoing financing costs), servicing and administrative fees and associated crediting; (7) bond maturities; (8) reporting templates; (9) the amount of any equity contributions;

 

72


(10) credit enhancements; and (11) the initial calculations of the securitized utility tariff charges. The preceding and other items may be reviewed by the Finance Team during the entire pre-issuance process. The pre-issuance review process will help ensure that the securitized utility tariff bonds will be issued with material terms that meet the requirements of the Securitization Law. The Finance Team’s review shall continue until the issuance advice letter is disapproved, approved, or takes effect by operation of law.

The Commission may require status meetings or phone conferences with the Finance Team and involved parties to communicate and update the Commission on the information being reviewed and prepared in the structuring and pricing process. The Commission may request access to the actual documents and information being reviewed by the Finance Team as needed. The Finance Team may submit written status reports to the Commission as it deems appropriate or as requested by the Commission. If concerns arise during the process, such status meetings, conferences or updates can be requested by the Finance Team or other involved parties as needed.

The Finance Team does not have the authority to direct how Evergy West places the securitized utility tariff bonds to market, but it shall be permitted to attend all meetings convened by Evergy West, and participate in all non-privileged calls, e-mails, and other communications relating to the structuring, pricing and issuance of the securitized utility tariff bonds, or be subsequently informed of the substance of those communications.

 

73


Supplementary to the submission of the issuance advice letter, Evergy West and the lead underwriters for the securitized utility tariff bonds shall provide a written certificate to the Commission certifying, and setting forth all calculations and assumptions used to support such calculations and certificate, that the issuance of the securitized utility tariff bonds (i) complies with this Financing Order, (ii) complies with all other applicable legal requirements (including all requirements of Section 393.1700), (iii) that the issuance of the securitized utility tariff bonds and the imposition of the securitized utility tariff charges are expected to provide quantifiable net present value benefits to customers as compared to recovery of the components of securitized utility tariff costs that would have been incurred absent the issuance of securitized utility tariff bonds, and (iv) that the structuring and pricing of the securitized utility tariff bonds will result in the lowest securitized utility tariff charges consistent with market conditions at the time the securitized utility tariff bonds are priced and the terms of this Financing Order. Such certificates shall be a condition precedent to the submission of the issuance advice letter to the Commission.

The securitized tariff bonds issued in compliance with this order shall have a triple-A rating from at least two of the nationally recognized rating agencies.

8) Should the Commission grant a waiver under Section 10(A)(1) of the Affiliate Transactions Rule between Evergy West and the SPE?

Findings of Fact

163. Evergy West does not believe that the SPE is an affiliate.218

164. Evergy West contends that the SPE’s activities will be restricted to acquiring the securitized property, issuing the securitization bonds, collecting the SUTC, and paying principal and interest on the bonds to the bondholders. The SPE will be overseen by an independent manager.219

 

218 

Ives Direct, Ex. 8, Page 18, Lines 4-5.

219 

Ives Direct, Ex. 8, Page 18, Lines 6-11.

 

74


165. The asymmetrical pricing requirement of Commission Rule 20 CSR 4240-20.015 requires a regulated utility to obtain the lower of fair market price or fully distributed costs for services provided to them by affiliates while also receiving the greater of market price or fully distributed costs for services it provides to affiliates.220

166. There is good cause to grant a waiver of the asymmetrical pricing provisions of the Commission’s affiliate transactions rule because the SPE will mainly perform corporate support functions such as the collection of the fees, any servicing fees, and some administrative duties.221

167. Staff does not oppose a waiver, but asserts that the sections of the affiliate transactions rule that apply to record keeping should not be waived because Staff will need to review the securitization-related affiliate transactions in a future rate case to ensure that the assignment of costs to the SPE is appropriate.222

Conclusions of Law

UU. Commission Rule 20 CSR 4240-20.015(1)(A) defines an affiliated entity as being directly or indirectly controlled by, or under common control with, a regulated electrical corporation.

VV. Commission Rule 20 CSR 4240-20.015(2)(A) provides:

A regulated electrical corporation shall not provide a financial advantage to an affiliated entity. For the purposes of this rule, a regulated electrical corporation shall be deemed to provide a financial advantage to an affiliated entity if—

1. It compensates an affiliated entity for goods or services above the lesser of—

A. The fair market price; or

B. The fully distributed cost to the regulated electrical corporation to provide the goods or services for itself; or

 

220 

Bolin Surrebuttal, Ex. 101, Page 2, Lines 1-21.

221 

Transcript, Page 343, Lines 10-15.

222 

Bolin Surrebuttal, Ex. 101, Page 3, Lines 4-9.

 

75


2. It transfers information, assets, goods or services of any kind to an affiliated entity below the greater of—

A. The fair market price; or

B. The fully distributed cost to the regulated electrical corporation.

Decision

The Commission disagrees with Evergy West’s assertion that the SPE is not an affiliate of the utility. The Commission also concurs with Staff’s oversight concerns. Even if the SPE performs only corporate support functions, without adherence to the record keeping requirements of the affiliate transactions rule the Commission would have no way to review the securitization-related affiliate transactions to ensure that the assignment of costs is appropriate. The Commission finds that the SPE is an affiliate of Evergy West. The Commission will grant a waiver of the asymmetrical pricing provisions of the Commission’s affiliate transactions rule, but not of the portions of the affiliate transactions rule relating to record retention.

Non-contested Issues

The Commission makes the following findings of fact.

A) Identification and Procedure

Identification of Petitioner and Background

168. Evergy Missouri West, Inc. d/b/a Evergy Missouri West is a Delaware corporation with its principal office and place of business at 1200 Main Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64105. Evergy West is engaged in the generation, transmission, distribution, and sale of electricity in Missouri. Evergy West is an “electrical corporation” and a “public utility” subject to the jurisdiction, supervision, and control of the Commission as provided by law. Evergy West is a wholly owned subsidiary of Evergy, Inc. A certificate of authority for Evergy West, as a foreign corporation, to do business in Missouri, was filed with the Commission in Case No. EN-2020-0064.

 

76


B) Financing Costs and Amount of Securitized Utility Tariff Costs to be Financed

Identification

169. The actual amount of up-front financing costs of the securitized utility tariff bonds will not be known until the securitized utility tariff bonds are sold and such amounts are approved in the issuance advice letter. The actual amount of certain ongoing financing costs relating to the securitized utility tariff bonds may not be known until such costs are incurred; provided that the securitization structure will limit the amount of ongoing financing costs to amounts appropriate for the size of the transaction.

170. Evergy West will use the proceeds from the sale of the securitized utility tariff property to recover costs incurred as a result of the anomalous weather event Winter Storm Uri, consisting of qualified extraordinary costs and financing costs, in accordance with the Securitization Law and this Financing Order.

171. The proposed structuring and pricing of the securitized utility tariff bonds are reasonably expected to result in the lowest securitized utility tariff charges consistent with market conditions at the time the securitized utility tariff bonds are priced and the terms of this Financing Order.

172. The securitized utility tariff bonds will be secured by securitized utility tariff property that shall be created in favor of Evergy West or its successors or assignees and that shall be used to pay or secure the securitized utility tariff bonds and approved financing costs. The securitized utility tariff property principally consists of the right to receive revenues from the securitized utility tariff charges.

 

77


173. It is appropriate that Evergy West be authorized to establish the terms and conditions of the securitized utility tariff bonds, including, but not limited to, repayment schedules, expected interest rates, and other financing costs, except as expressly limited in this Financing Order. The Finance Team will review the complete terms and conditions of the securitized utility tariff bonds, the calculations of the initial securitized utility tariff charges, the expected and actual up-front and ongoing financing costs and the net present value calculations set forth in the issuance advice letter.

174. After the final terms of the securitized utility tariff bonds have been established and before the issuance of such bonds, it is appropriate for Evergy West to determine the resulting initial securitized utility tariff charge in accordance with this Financing Order, and that such initial charge be final and effective upon the issuance of such securitized utility tariff bonds with such charge to be reflected on a compliance tariff sheet bearing such charge that will be submitted to the Commission at the same time as the issuance advice letter.

175. Evergy West proposed a method of tracing funds collected as securitized utility tariff charges, or other proceeds of securitized utility tariff property.

176. Evergy West shall earn a return, at the WACC of 8.9 percent authorized from time to time by the Commission in Evergy West’s rate proceedings, on any moneys advanced by Evergy West to fund the capital subaccount established under the terms of the indenture or other financing documents pertaining to the securitized utility tariff bonds. This return shall be included as an ongoing financing cost to be paid through the collection of securitized utility tariff charges.

 

78


177. It is appropriate that Evergy West shall be authorized to issue securitized utility tariff bonds pursuant to this Financing Order for an “effective period” commencing with the date of this Financing Order and extending 24 months following the date on which this Financing Order becomes final and no longer subject to any appeal. If, at any time during the effective period of this Financing Order, there is a severe disruption in the financial markets of the United States, it is appropriate for the effective period to be extended in consultation with the Finance Team to a date which is not less than 90 days after the date such disruption ends.

Issuance Advice Letter

178. As the actual structure and pricing of the securitized utility tariff bonds will be unknown at the time this Financing Order is issued, prior to the issuance of the securitized utility tariff bonds, Evergy West will provide an issuance advice letter to the Commission following the determination of the final terms of the securitized utility tariff bonds no later than one day after the pricing of the securitized utility tariff bonds. The issuance advice letter will include total up-front financing costs for the issuance. The form of such issuance advice letter, which shall indicate the final structure of the securitized utility tariff bonds and provide the best available estimate of total ongoing financing costs, is set out in Appendix A to this Financing Order. The issuance advice letter shall report the initial securitized utility tariff charges and other information specific to the securitized utility tariff bonds to be issued, as required under this Financing Order. The issuance advice letter will demonstrate the quantifiable net present value savings from the issuance of the securitized utility tariff bonds as compared to the customary method of financing. Evergy West may proceed with the issuance of the securitized utility tariff bonds unless, prior to noon on the fourth business day after the Commission receives the issuance advice letter, the Commission issues a disapproval letter directing that the securitized utility tariff bonds as proposed shall not be issued and the basis for that disapproval.

 

79


179. If the actual up-front financing costs are less than the up-front financing costs included in the principal amount securitized, the amount of such unused funds (together with interest, if any, earned on the investment of such funds) will be returned to customers in a general rate proceeding. If the actual up-front financing costs are more than the up-front financing costs included in the principal amount securitized, Evergy West will have the right to be reimbursed for such prudently incurred excess amounts through the establishment of a regulatory asset.

180. Evergy West will submit a draft issuance advice letter to the Finance Team for review not later than two weeks before the expected date of commencement of marketing the securitized utility tariff bonds. The Finance Team will review the issuance advice letter and provide timely feedback to Evergy West based on the progression of structuring, marketing and pricing of the securitized utility tariff bonds.

181. The issuance advice letter for the securitized utility tariff bonds must be submitted to the Commission not later than one day after the pricing of the securitized utility tariff bonds. The Finance Team may request such revisions to the issuance advice letter as may be necessary to ensure the accuracy of the calculations and information included and that the requirements of the Securitization Law and of this Financing Order have been met. The initial securitized utility tariff charges and the final terms of the securitized utility tariff bonds set forth in the issuance advice letter must become effective on the date of issuance of the securitized utility tariff bonds (which must not occur before

 

80


the fifth business day after pricing of the securitized utility tariff bonds) unless before noon on the fourth business day after the Commission receives the issuance advice letter the Commission issues a disapproval letter directing that the securitized utility tariff bonds as proposed shall not be issued and the basis for that disapproval.

C) Structure of the Proposed Securitization

Special Purpose Entity

182. For purposes of issuing the securitized utility tariff bonds, Evergy West will create a bankruptcy-remote SPE, which will be a Delaware limited liability company with Evergy West as its sole member. The SPE will be formed for the limited purpose of acquiring securitized utility tariff property, issuing securitized utility tariff bonds in one or more tranches, and performing other activities relating thereto or otherwise authorized by this Financing Order. The SPE will not be permitted to engage in any other activities and will have no assets other than securitized utility tariff property and related assets to support its obligations under the securitized utility tariff bonds. Obligations relating to the securitized utility tariff bonds will be the SPE’s only material liabilities. These restrictions on the activities of SPE and restrictions on the ability of Evergy West to take action on the SPE’s behalf are imposed to achieve the objective that the SPE will be bankruptcy-remote and not affected by a bankruptcy of Evergy West or any other person. The SPE will be managed by a board of directors or a board of managers with rights and duties similar to those of a board of directors of a corporation. As long as the securitized utility tariff bonds remain outstanding, the SPE will be overseen by at least one independent director or manager whose approval will be required for any bankruptcy-related actions and certain other major actions or organizational changes. The SPE will not be permitted to amend

 

81


the provisions of the organizational documents that relate to bankruptcy-remoteness of the SPE without the consent of the independent directors or managers. Similarly, the SPE will not be permitted to institute bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings or to consent to the institution of bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings against it, or to dissolve, liquidate, consolidate, convert, or merge without the consent of the independent director or manager. Other restrictions to facilitate bankruptcy-remoteness may also be included in the organizational documents of the SPE as required by the rating agencies.

183. The initial capital of the SPE will be not less than 0.50 percent of the original principal amount of the securitized utility tariff bonds issued by the SPE. Adequate funding of the SPE at this level is intended to protect the bankruptcy-remoteness of the SPE.

Statutory Requirements

184. The SPE will issue securitized utility tariff bonds in one series consisting of one or more tranches. The aggregate principle amount of all tranches of the securitized utility tariff bonds issued under this Financing Order must not exceed the principal amount approved by this Financing Order. The SPE will pledge to the indenture trustee, as collateral for payment of the securitized utility tariff bonds, the securitized utility tariff property, including the SPE’s right to receive the securitized utility tariff charges as and when collected, and certain other collateral described herein.

185. Concurrent with the issuance of any of the securitized utility tariff bonds, Evergy West will sell to the SPE the securitized utility tariff property, consisting of all of the following: (a) Evergy West’s rights and interests under this Financing Order, including the right to impose, bill, charge, collect, and receive securitized utility tariff charges authorized under this Financing Order and to obtain periodic adjustments to such charges

 

82


as provided in this Financing Order and (b) all revenues, collections, claims, rights to payments, payments, money, or proceeds arising from the rights and interests specified in this Financing Order, regardless of whether such revenues, collections, claims, rights to payment, payments, money, or proceeds are imposed, billed, received, collected, or maintained together with or commingled with other revenues, collections, rights to payment, payments, money, or proceeds. This transfer will be structured so that it will qualify as a “true sale” within the meaning of Section 393.1700.5.(3) and that such rights will become securitized utility tariff property concurrently with their sale to the SPE as provided in Section 393.1700.2.(3)(d). By virtue of the transfer, the SPE will acquire all of the right, title, and interest of Evergy West in the securitized utility tariff property arising under this Financing Order.

Credit Enhancement and Arrangements to Enhance Marketability

186. Evergy West is permitted to recover the ongoing costs of any credit enhancements and arrangements to enhance marketability, if such credit enhancements are required by the rating agencies to achieve the highest possible credit rating on the securitized utility tariff bonds and subject to consultation with the Finance Team. If the use of more than de minimis original issue discount, credit enhancements, or other arrangements is proposed by Evergy West, Evergy West must provide the Finance Team with copies of all cost-benefit analyses performed by or for Evergy West that support the request to use such arrangements. This finding does not apply to the collection account or its subaccounts to be established under the indenture set forth in this Financing Order.

 

83


Securitized Utility Tariff Property

187. Securitized utility tariff property and all other collateral will be held and administered by the indenture trustee under the indenture.

Servicer and the Servicing Agreement

188. Evergy West, as the initial servicer of the securitization property, will enter into a servicing agreement with the SPE, as owner of the securitization property. The servicing agreement may be amended, renewed or replaced by another servicing agreement subject to certain conditions set forth therein. The entity responsible for carrying out the servicing obligations under any servicing agreement is the servicer. Evergy West will be the initial servicer but may be succeeded as servicer by another entity under certain circumstances detailed in the servicing agreement and as authorized by the Commission. Under the servicing agreement, the servicer is required to, among other things, impose and collect the securitized utility tariff charges for the benefit and account of the SPE, make the periodic true-up adjustments of securitized utility tariff charges required or permitted by this Financing Order, and account for and remit the securitized utility tariff charges to or for the account of the SPE in accordance with the remittance procedures contained in the servicing agreement and the indenture without any charge, deduction or surcharge of any kind. Under the terms of the servicing agreement, if any servicer fails to perform its servicing obligations in any material respect, the indenture trustee acting under the indenture to be entered into in connection with the issuance of the securitized utility tariff bonds, may, or, upon the instruction of the requisite percentage of holders of the outstanding amount of securitized utility tariff bonds, must, appoint an alternate party to replace the defaulting servicer, in which case the replacement servicer

 

84


will perform the obligations of the servicer under the servicing agreement. The obligations of the servicer under the servicing agreement and the circumstances under which an alternate servicer may be appointed will be more fully described in the servicing agreement. The rights of the SPE under the servicing agreement will be included in the collateral pledged to the indenture trustee under the indenture for the benefit of holders of the securitized utility tariff bonds.

189. The obligations to continue to provide service and to collect and account for securitized utility tariff charges will be binding upon Evergy West and any other entity that provides electrical services to a person that is a retail customer located within Evergy West’s service area as it exists on the date of this Financing Order, or that became a retail customer for electric services within such service area after the date of this Financing Order, and is still located within such area.

190. To the extent that Evergy West assigns, sells or transfers any interest in its transmission or distribution system (or any portion thereof) to an assignee,223 Evergy West will enter into a contract with that assignee that will require the entity acquiring such facilities to continue operating the facilities to provide electric services to Evergy West’s customers, subject to approval of the Commission and in accordance with the other conditions set forth in the servicing agreement and this Financing Order.

 

223 

The term assignee means any corporation, Limited Liability Company, general partnership or limited partnership, public authority, trust, financing entity, or other legally recognized entity to which an interest in securitized utility tariff property is transferred, other than as security, including any assignee of that party. See § 393.1700.1.(2).

 

85


Securitized Utility Tariff Bonds

191. The SPE will issue and sell securitized utility tariff bonds in one series consisting of one or more tranches. The legal final maturity date of the securitized utility tariff bonds will not exceed 17 years from the date of issuance. The legal final maturity date and principal amounts of each tranche will be finally determined by Evergy West in consultation with the Finance Team, consistent with market conditions and indications of the rating agencies, at the time the securitized utility tariff bonds are priced, but subject to ultimate Commission review through the issuance advice letter process. Subject to the conditions and criteria set forth in this Financing Order, Evergy West will retain sole discretion regarding whether or when to assign, sell, or otherwise transfer any rights concerning securitized utility tariff property arising under this Financing Order, or to cause the issuance of any securitized utility tariff bonds authorized in this Financing Order, subject to the right of the Commission to issue a disapproval letter.

Security for Securitized Utility Tariff Bonds

192. The payment of the securitized utility tariff bonds and related charges authorized by this Financing Order is to be secured by the securitized utility tariff property created by this Financing Order and certain other collateral as described herein. The securitized utility tariff bonds will be issued under an indenture administered by the indenture trustee. The indenture will include provisions for a collection account for the series and subaccounts for the collection and administration of the securitized utility tariff charges and payment or funding of the principal and interest on the securitized utility tariff bonds and ongoing financing costs in connection with the securitized utility tariff bonds approved in this Financing Order. In accordance with the indenture, a collection account will be established as a trust account to be held by the indenture trustee as collateral to ensure the payment of the principal, interest, and ongoing financing costs approved in this Financing Order related to the securitized utility tariff bonds in full and on a timely basis. The collection account will include the general subaccount, the capital subaccount, and the excess funds subaccount, and may include other subaccounts.

 

86


The General Subaccount

193. The indenture trustee will deposit the securitized utility tariff charge remittances that the servicer remits to the indenture trustee for the account of the SPE into one or more segregated trust accounts and allocate the amount of those remittances to the general subaccount. The indenture trustee will on a periodic basis apply moneys in this subaccount to pay principal of and interest on the securitized utility tariff bonds, to pay ongoing financing costs and to replenish any draws on the capital subaccount. The funds in the general subaccount will be invested by the indenture trustee in short-term high-quality investments, and such funds (including, to the extent necessary, investment earnings) will be applied by the indenture trustee to pay principal of and interest on the securitized utility tariff bonds and all other components of the total securitized revenue requirement (as defined in finding of fact number 203), and otherwise in accordance with the terms of the indenture.

The Capital Subaccount

194. Evergy West will make a capital contribution to the SPE, which the SPE will deposit into the capital subaccount. The amount of the capital contribution will be not less than 0.50 percent of the original principal amount of the securitized utility tariff bonds, although the actual amount will depend on tax and rating agency requirements. The capital subaccount will serve as collateral to ensure timely payment of principal of and interest on the securitized utility tariff bonds and all other components of the total securitized revenue requirement. Any funds drawn from the capital account to pay these

 

87


amounts due to a shortfall in the securitized utility tariff charge remittances will be replenished through future securitized utility tariff charge remittances. The funds in the capital subaccount will be invested by the indenture trustee in short-term high-quality investments, and such funds (including investment earnings) will be used by the indenture trustee to pay principal of and interest on the securitized utility tariff bonds and all other components of the total securitized revenue requirement. Evergy West will be authorized to receive a return on the capital contribution at the WACC of 8.9 percent as ongoing financing costs recoverable through the securitized utility tariff charge. Upon payment of the principal amount of all securitized utility tariff bonds and the discharge of all obligations that may be paid by use of securitized utility tariff charges, all amounts remaining in the capital subaccount at that time, will be released to the SPE for payment to Evergy West. Evergy West will account for any investment earnings on funds in the capital subaccount in a reconciliation in a general rate case and such amounts will be credited to ratepayers.

The Excess Funds Subaccount

195. The excess funds subaccount will hold any securitized utility tariff charge remittances and investment earnings on the collection account in excess of the amounts needed to pay current principal of and interest on the securitized utility tariff bonds and to pay other total securitized revenue requirements (including, but not limited to, replenishing the capital subaccount). Any balance in or allocated to the excess funds subaccount on a true-up adjustment date will be subtracted from the total securitized revenue requirement (as defined in finding of fact number 203) for purposes of the true-up adjustment. The money in the excess funds subaccount will be invested by the indenture trustee in short-term high-quality investments, and such money (including investment earnings thereon) will be used by the indenture trustee to pay principal and interest on the securitized utility tariff bonds and other total securitized revenue requirements.

 

88


Other Subaccounts

196. Other credit enhancements in the form of subaccounts may be utilized for the transaction provided that the use of such subaccounts is consistent with the Statutory Requirements and subject to consultation with the Finance Team. For example, Evergy West does not propose use of an overcollateralization subaccount. Under Rev. Proc. 2002-49, as modified, amplified and superseded by Rev. Proc. 2005-62 issued by the IRS, the use of an overcollateralization subaccount is not necessary for favorable tax treatment nor does it appear to be necessary to obtain AAA ratings for the proposed securitized utility tariff bonds. If Evergy West subsequently determines in consultation with the Finance Team that use of an overcollateralization subaccount or other subaccount is necessary to obtain AAA ratings from the credit agencies or will otherwise increase the quantifiable net present value benefits of the securitization, Evergy West may implement such subaccounts to reduce securitized utility tariff bond charges.

General Provisions

197. The collection account and the subaccounts described above are intended to provide for full and timely payment of scheduled principal of and interest on the securitized utility tariff bonds and all other components of the total securitized revenue requirement. If the amount of securitized utility tariff charges remitted to the general subaccount is insufficient to make all scheduled payments of principal and interest on the securitized utility tariff bonds and to make payment on all of the other components of the

 

89


total securitized revenue requirement, the excess funds subaccount and the capital subaccount will be drawn down, in that order, to make those payments. Any deficiency in the capital subaccount due to such withdrawals must be replenished to the capital subaccount on a periodic basis through the true-up process. In addition to the foregoing, there may be such additional accounts and subaccounts as are necessary to segregate amounts received from various sources, or to be used for specified purposes. Such accounts will be administered and utilized as set forth in the servicing agreement and the indenture. Upon the maturity of the securitized utility tariff bonds and the discharge of all obligations in respect thereof, remaining amounts in the collection account, other than amounts that were in the capital subaccount, will be released to the SPE and equivalent amounts will be credited by Evergy West to customers. In addition, upon the maturity of the securitized utility tariff bonds, any subsequently collected securitized utility tariff charges shall be credited to retail customers.

Securitized Utility Tariff Charges—Imposition and Collection, Nonbypassability, and Alternative Electric Suppliers

198. In the event the State of Missouri permits third-party billing, the securitized utility tariff charges must continue to be collected by a third-party biller and remitted to the SPE.

199. Securitized utility tariff charges will be identified on each customer’s bill as a separate line item and include both the rate and the amount of the charge on each bill. Each customer bill shall include a statement to the effect that the SPE is the owner of the rights to securitized utility tariff charges and that Evergy West is acting as servicer for the SPE. The tariff applicable to customers shall indicate the securitized utility tariff charge and the ownership of the charge.

 

90


200. If any customer does not pay the full amount it has been billed, the amount collected will be prorated among charge categories in proportion to their percentage of the overall bill, with the first dollars collected attributed to past due balances, if any.

201. Evergy West will collect securitized utility tariff charges from all existing or future retail customers receiving electrical service from Evergy West or its successors or assignees under Commission-approved rate schedules, except for customers receiving electrical service under special contracts 224 as of August 28, 2021, even if a retail customer elects to purchase electricity from an alternative electricity supplier following a change in regulation of public utilities in Missouri. Any such existing or future retail customer within such area may not avoid securitized utility tariff charges by switching to another electrical corporation, electric cooperative, or municipally owned utility on or after the date this Financing Order is issued.

202. The imposition and collection of securitized utility tariff charges set forth in this Financing Order is reasonable and is necessary to ensure collection of securitized utility tariff charges sufficient to support recovery of the securitized utility tariff costs and financing costs approved in this Financing Order. The form of Securitized Utility Tariff Rider included in this Financing Order is reasonable and these tariff provisions will be filed before any securitized utility tariff bonds are issued under this Financing Order.

 

224

See Section 393.1700.1.(19) RSMo.

 

91


Allocation of Financing Costs Among Missouri Retail Customers

203. The total securitized revenue requirement is the required securitized revenues for a given period (e.g., annually, semi-annually, or quarterly) due under the securitized utility tariff bonds. Each total securitized revenue requirement includes: (a) the principal amortization of the securitized utility tariff bonds in accordance with the expected amortization schedule (including deficiencies of previously scheduled principal for any reason); (b) periodic interest on the securitized utility tariff bonds (including any accrued and unpaid interest); (c) ongoing financing costs consisting of the servicing fee, rating agencies’ fees, trustee fees, legal and accounting fees, other ongoing fees and expenses approved herein, and the costs, if any, of maintaining any credit enhancement; (d) bad debts net of prior recovery period collections; and (e) for each of (a) through (d), any variations calculated through a reconciliation of the current period total securitized revenue requirement actuals to the projections, forecasts, or estimates to the extent that actuals are available. The initial total securitized revenue requirement for the securitized utility tariff bonds issued under this Financing Order will be updated in the issuance advice letter, subject to review and consultation with the Finance Team.

204. The securitized utility tariff costs and financing costs that will be recovered through the securitized utility tariff charges authorized by this Financing Order are allocated to all applicable customers on the basis of loss-adjusted energy sales. The securitized utility tariff costs applicable to customers served at each voltage level is accomplished by first dividing the sum of the amounts described above by the forecasted recovery period retail sales to all applicable customers (adjusted to generation voltage) by the voltage level expansion factor applicable to each service voltage.

 

92


True-Up of Securitized Utility Tariff Charges

205. The servicer of the securitized utility tariff bonds will use a formula-based true-up mechanism to make periodic, expeditious adjustments, at least annually, to the securitized utility tariff charges to:

 

  (a)

correct any undercollections or overcollections that may have occurred and otherwise ensure that the SPE receives remittances from securitized utility tariff charges that are required to satisfy the total securitized revenue requirement, including without limitation any overcollections or undercollections caused by defaults, during the time since the last true-up; and

 

  (b)

ensure the billing of securitized utility tariff charges necessary to generate the collection of amounts sufficient to timely provide all payments of scheduled principal and interest (or deposits to sinking funds in respect of principal and interest) and any other amounts due in connection with the securitized utility tariff bonds (including ongoing financing costs and amounts required to be deposited in or allocated to any collection account or subaccount) during the period for which such adjusted securitized utility tariff charges are to be in effect.

The servicer will make true-up adjustment filings with the Commission annually, and if the servicer forecasts undercollections semi-annually.

206. True-up filings will be incorporated into the next recovery period based upon the cumulative differences, regardless of the reason, between the total securitized revenue requirement (including scheduled principal of and interest payments on the securitized utility tariff bonds) designed to be recovered during the current recovery period and the amount of securitized utility tariff charge remittances to the indenture trustee received during the current recovery period from application of the current rate then in effect. To ensure adequate securitized utility tariff charge revenues to fund the total

 

93


securitized revenue requirement and to avoid overcollections and undercollections over time, some required data contemplated to be actual may be projected or forecasted as of the time of filing the tariff (including projections of uncollectible securitized utility tariff charges; projections of payment lags between the billing and collection of the securitized utility tariff charges; and forecast retail sales for the recovery period). To the extent projected or forecasted data is used in calculating the securitized utility tariff charges, such projections and forecasts will be reconciled in future calculations of the securitized utility tariff charges through a true-up adjustment.

207. At the time of each true-up adjustment, the servicer will provide a new total securitized revenue requirement amount for the coming recovery period which shall incorporate any variations calculated through a reconciliation of the current recovery period new total securitized revenue requirement actuals to the projections, forecasts, or estimates to the extent that actuals are available. The servicer will provide its best available forecasted sales for the coming recovery period, and all supporting information. The true-up amount will be included in the calculation of the total securitized revenue requirement applicable to the next recovery period.

Interim True-Up

208. In addition to annual true-up adjustments, the servicer (a) will make interim true-up adjustments semi-annually (or quarterly beginning 12 months prior to the final scheduled payment date of the last tranche of the securitized utility tariff bonds) or (b) may make interim true-up adjustments at any time:

 

  (a)

if the servicer forecasts that securitized utility tariff charge collections will be insufficient to make all scheduled payments of principal, interest, and other amounts in respect of the securitized utility tariff bonds on a timely basis during the current or next succeeding payment period; or

 

  (b)

to replenish any draws upon the capital subaccount.

 

94


Additional True-Up Provisions

209. Each true-up adjustment filing will be filed not less than 30 days before the billing cycle of the month in which the revised securitized utility tariff charge will be in effect. Each true-up adjustment filing will set forth the servicer’s calculation of the true-up adjustment to the securitized utility tariff charges. Within 30 days after receiving a true-up adjustment filing, the Commission will either approve the request or inform Evergy West of any mathematical or clerical errors in its calculation. If the Commission informs Evergy West of mathematical or clerical errors in its calculation, Evergy West will correct its error and refile its request. The time frames previously described in this paragraph will apply to a refiled request.

Lowest Securitized Utility Tariff Charges

210. The proposed transaction structure includes (but is not limited to):

 

  (a)

the use of the SPE as issuer of the securitized utility tariff bonds, limiting the risks to securitized utility tariff bond holders of any adverse impact resulting from a bankruptcy proceeding of Evergy West or any other person;

 

  (b)

the right to impose and collect securitized utility tariff charges that are nonbypassable and which must be trued-up at least annually, but may be trued-up more frequently to assure the timely payment of the debt service and other ongoing financing costs;

 

95


  (c)

additional collateral in the form of a collection account that includes a capital subaccount funded in cash in an amount equal to not less than 0.50 percent of the original principal amount of the securitized utility tariff bonds and other subaccounts resulting in greater certainty of payment of interest and principal to investors and that are consistent with the IRS requirements that must be met to receive the desired federal income tax treatment for the securitized utility tariff bond transaction;

 

  (d)

protection of securitized utility tariff bondholders against potential defaults by a servicer that is responsible for billing and collecting the securitized utility tariff charges from existing or future retail customers;

 

  (e)

benefits for federal income tax purposes including (i) the transfer of the rights under this Financing Order to the SPE not resulting in gross income to Evergy West and the future revenues under the securitized utility tariff charges being included in Evergy West’s gross income under its usual method of accounting, (ii) the issuance of the securitized utility tariff bonds and the transfer of the proceeds of the securitized utility tariff bonds to Evergy West not resulting in gross income to Evergy West, and (iii) the securitized utility tariff bonds constituting obligations of Evergy West; and

 

  (f)

the securitized utility tariff bonds will be marketed using underwriting and marketing processes reviewed in consultation with the Finance Team, through which market conditions and investors’ preferences, with regard to the timing of the issuance, the terms and conditions, related maturities, and other aspects of the structuring, marketing and pricing, will be determined, evaluated and factored into the structuring, marketing and pricing of the securitized utility tariff bonds.

 

96


211. To ensure that customers receive the quantifiable net present value benefits due from the proposed securitization and so that the proposed securitized utility tariff bond transaction will be in accordance with the quantifiable net present value benefits test set forth in Section 393.1700.2.(3)(c), it is necessary that (i) the issuance advice letter demonstrates that the proposed issuance of securitized utility tariff bonds and the imposition and collection of a securitized utility tariff charge are just and reasonable and in the public interest; and will provide quantifiable net present value benefits to customers as compared to recovery of the components of securitized utility tariff costs that would have been incurred absent the issuance of securitized utility tariff bonds, (ii) the scheduled final payment of the last tranche of securitized utility tariff bonds will not exceed 15 years (although the legal final maturity of the securitized utility tariff bonds may extend to 17 years) and (iii) Evergy West otherwise satisfies the requirements of this Financing Order.

D) Use of Proceeds

212. Upon the issuance of securitized utility tariff bonds, the SPE will use the net proceeds from the sale of the securitized utility tariff bonds (after payment of up-front financing costs) to pay Evergy West the purchase price of the securitized utility tariff property. Evergy West will use the proceeds from the sale of the securitized utility tariff property to recover the qualified extraordinary costs incurred by Evergy West in connection with the anomalous weather event Winter Storm Uri approved herein.

 

97


213. SPP has issued resettlements in the months of June, August, and December 2021 after the winter weather event. Evergy West will continue to track and adjust the amount that is ultimately requested to be financed in this proceeding as a result any other resettlements or adjustments that may occur, and will report these to the Commission on a monthly basis, provided, however, nothing may impact the amount of securitized utility tariff bonds or the securitized utility tariff charges.

V. Conclusions of Law

The Commission makes the following conclusions of law.

WW. Evergy West is an electrical corporation, as defined in Section 393.1700.1(6).

XX. Evergy Missouri West is entitled to file a petition for a financing order under Section 393.1700.

YY. The Commission has jurisdiction and authority over Evergy West’s petition under Section 393.1700.2.

ZZ. The Commission has authority to approve this Financing Order under Section 393.1700.2.

AAA. Notice of Evergy West’s petition was provided in compliance with Section 393.1700.2.(3)(a)b.

BBB. The Securitization Law permits an electrical corporation request a Commission order authorizing it to finance securitized utility tariff costs, including its qualified extraordinary costs.

 

98


CCC. Qualified extraordinary costs are defined in Section 393.1700.1.(13) to include costs incurred prudently before, on, or after August 28, 2021, of an extraordinary nature which would cause extreme customer rate impacts if reflected in retail customer rates recovered through customary ratemaking, such as but not limited to those related to purchases of fuel or power, inclusive of carrying charges, during anomalous weather events. Securitized utility tariff costs are defined Section 393.1700.1.(17) to include either energy transition costs or qualified extraordinary costs, as the case may be. Financing costs are defined in Section 393.1700.1.(8) to include: (i) interest and acquisition, defeasance, or redemption premiums payable on securitized utility tariff bonds; (ii) any payment required under an ancillary agreement and any amount required to fund or replenish a reserve account or other accounts established under the terms of any indenture, ancillary agreement, or other financing documents pertaining to securitized utility tariff bonds; (iii) any other cost related to issuing supporting, repaying, refunding, and servicing securitized utility tariff bonds, including servicing fees, accounting and auditing fees, trustee fees, legal fees, consulting fees, structuring adviser fees, administrative fees, placement and underwriting fees, independent director and manager fees, capitalized interest, rating agency fees, stock exchange listing and compliance fees, security registration fees, filing fees, information technology programming costs, and any other costs necessary to otherwise ensure the timely payment of securitized utility tariff bonds or other amounts or charges payable in connection with the bonds, including costs related to obtaining the financing order; (iv) any taxes and license fees or other fees imposed on the revenues generated from the collection of securitized utility tariff charges or otherwise resulting from the collection of securitized utility tariff charges, in any such case whether paid, payable, or accrued; (v) any state and local taxes, franchise, gross receipts, and other taxes or similar charges, including Commission assessment fees,

 

99


whether paid, payable, or accrued; and (vi) any costs associated with performance of the Commission’s responsibilities under the Securitization Law in connection with approving, approving subject to conditions, or rejecting a petition for a financing order, and in performing its duties in connection with the issuance advice letter process, including costs to retain counsel, one or more financial advisors, or other consultants as deemed appropriate by the Commission and paid pursuant to the Securitization Law.

DDD. The SPE constitutes an assignee of Evergy West as defined in Section 393.1700.1.(2) when an interest in the securitized utility tariff property created under this Financing Order is transferred to SPE.

EEE. The holders of the securitized utility tariff bonds and the indenture trustee will each be a financing party as defined in Section 393.1700.1.(10).

FFF. The SPE may issue securitized utility tariff bonds in accordance with this Financing Order.

GGG. The issuance of securitized utility tariff bonds and the imposition and collection of securitized utility tariff charges approved in this Financing Order satisfies the requirements of Sections 393.1700.2.(3)(c)a., b. and c. mandating that (1) the amount of securitized utility tariff costs to be financed using securitized utility tariff bonds and the recovery of such costs is just and reasonable and in the public interest; (2) the proposed issuance of securitized utility tariff bonds and the imposition and collection of securitized utility tariff charges are just and reasonable and in the public interest and are expected to provide quantifiable net present value benefits to customers as compared to recovery of the components of securitized utility tariff costs that would have been incurred absent the issuance of securitized utility tariff bonds; and (3) the proposed structuring and pricing of the securitized utility tariff bonds are reasonably expected to result in the lowest securitized utility tariff charges consistent with market conditions at the time the securitized utility tariff bonds are priced and the terms of the financing order.

 

100


HHH. Evergy West is permitted to earn a return, at the cost of capital authorized hereunder, but no more, on any moneys advanced by Evergy West to fund reserves, if any, or capital accounts established under the terms of the indenture, any ancillary agreement, or other financing documents pertaining to the securitized utility tariff bonds. Evergy West shall account for any investment earnings on funds in such capital accounts in a future reconciliation pursuant to Section 393.1700.2.(3)(c)l.

III. This Financing Order adequately describes the amount of financing costs that Evergy West may recover through securitized utility tariff charges and specifies the period over which Evergy West may recover securitized utility tariff charges and financing costs in accordance with the requirements of Section 393.1700.2.(3)(c)a.

JJJ. The method approved in this Financing Order for allocating the securitized utility tariff charges satisfies the requirements of Section 393.1700.2.(3)(c)h.

KKK. As provided in Section 393.1700.2(3)(f), at the time the securitized utility tariff property is transferred from Evergy West to the SPE, this Financing Order is irrevocable and, except for changes made pursuant to the formula-based true-up mechanism authorized herein, the Commission may not amend, modify, or terminate the financing order by any subsequent action or reduce, impair, postpone, terminate, or otherwise adjust securitized utility tariff charges approved in this Financing Order.

 

101


LLL. As provided in Section 393.1700.2.(3)(d), the securitized utility tariff property identified herein will become securitized utility tariff property under the Securitization Law when it is sold to the SPE.

MMM. (a) All rights and interests of Evergy West under this Financing Order, including the right to impose, bill, charge, collect, and receive securitized utility tariff charges authorized in this Financing Order and to obtain periodic adjustments to such charges as provided in this Financing Order and (b) all revenues, collections, claims, rights to payments, payments, money, or proceeds arising from the rights and interests specified in this Financing Order, regardless of whether such revenues, collections, claims, rights to payment, payments, money, or proceeds are imposed, billed, received, collected, or maintained together with or commingled with other revenues, collections, rights to payment, payments, money, or proceeds that are sold to the SPE under the securitized utility tariff property sale agreement, will be securitized utility tariff property within the meaning of Section 393.1700.1.(18), are assignable and will become securitized utility tariff property when they are first transferred to SPE.

NNN. Upon its sale to the SPE, the securitized utility tariff property specified in this Financing Order will constitute an existing, present intangible property right or interest therein, notwithstanding that the imposition and collection of securitized utility tariff charges depends on Evergy West performing its servicing functions relating to the collection of securitized utility tariff charges and on future electricity consumption, as provided by Section 393.1700.5.(1)(a). The securitized utility tariff property will exist (a) regardless of whether or not the revenues or proceeds arising from the property have been billed, have accrued, or have been collected; and (b) notwithstanding the fact that the value or amount of the property is dependent on the future provision of service to customers by the electrical corporation or its successors or assignees and the future consumption of electricity by customers.

 

102


OOO. The securitized utility tariff property specified in this Financing Order will continue to exist until the securitized utility tariff bonds issued pursuant to this Financing Order are paid in full and all financing costs and other costs of such securitized utility tariff bonds have been recovered in full as provided in Section 393.1700.5.(1)(b).

PPP. Upon the transfer by Evergy West of securitized utility tariff property to the SPE, the SPE will have all of the rights, title, and interest of Evergy West with respect to such securitized utility tariff property, including the right to impose, bill, charge, collect, and receive the securitized utility tariff charges authorized by this Financing Order.

QQQ. The securitized utility tariff bonds issued under this Financing Order will be securitized utility tariff bonds within the meaning of Section 393.1700.1.(15), and the securitized utility tariff bonds and holders thereof will be entitled to all of the protections provided under Section 393.1700.11.

RRR. Amounts that are authorized by this Financing Order or the tariffs approved hereby are securitized utility tariff charges as defined in Section 393.1700.1.(16), and the amounts collected from retail customers with respect to such securitized utility tariff charges are securitized utility tariff charges as defined in Section 393.1700.1.(16).

SSS. As provided in Section 393.1700.5.(1)(e), the interests of SPE and the indenture trustee in the securitized utility tariff property and in the revenues and collections arising from the securitized utility tariff property will not be subject to setoff, counterclaim, surcharge, or defense by Evergy West or any other person or in connection with the reorganization, bankruptcy, or other insolvency of Evergy West or any other entity.

 

103


TTT. The methodology approved in this Financing Order to true-up the securitized utility tariff charges satisfies the requirements of Section 393.1700.2.(3)(c)e.

UUU. Upon the sale from Evergy West to the SPE of the securitized utility tariff property, the servicer will be able to recover the securitized utility tariff charges associated with such securitized utility tariff property only for the benefit of the SPE in accordance with the servicing agreement.

VVV. As provided in Section 393.1700.3.(5), Evergy West retains sole discretion regarding whether to cause the securitized utility tariff bonds to be issued, including the right to defer or postpone such sale, assignment, transfer, or issuance. Evergy West may abandon the issuance of securitized utility tariff bonds under this Financing Order by filing with the Commission a statement of abandonment and the reasons therefor.

WWW. The sale of the securitized utility tariff property from Evergy West to the SPE will be an absolute transfer and true sale of, and not a pledge of or secured transaction relating to, Evergy West’s right, title, and interest in, to, and under the securitized utility tariff property if the sale agreement governing such sale expressly states that the sale is a sale or other absolute transfer in accordance with Sections 393.1700.5.(3)(a) and (b). Upon the sale in accordance with the previous sentence, the characterization of the sale as an absolute transfer and true sale and the corresponding characterization of the property interest of the SPE will not be affected or impaired by the occurrence of (a) the commingling of securitized utility tariff charges with other amounts; (b) the retention by Evergy West of (i) a partial or residual interest, including an equity

 

104


interest, in the securitized utility tariff property, whether direct or indirect, or whether subordinate or otherwise, or (ii) the right to recover costs associated with taxes, franchise fees, or license fees imposed on the collection of securitized utility tariff charges; (c) any recourse that the SPE may have against Evergy West; (d) any indemnification rights, obligations, or repurchase rights made or provided by Evergy West; (e) the obligation of Evergy West to collect securitized utility tariff charges on behalf of the SPE; (f) Evergy West acting as the servicer of the securitized utility tariff charges or the existence of any contract that authorizes or requires the electrical corporation, to the extent that any interest in securitized utility tariff property is sold or assigned, to contract with the SPE or any financing party that it will continue to operate its system to provide service to its customers, will collect amounts in respect of the securitized utility tariff charges for the benefit and account of the SPE or such financing party, and will account for and remit such amounts to or for the account of such assignee or financing party; (g) the treatment of the sale, conveyance, assignment, or other transfer for tax, financial reporting, or other purposes; (h) the granting or providing to bondholders a preferred right to the securitized utility tariff property or credit enhancement by Evergy West or its affiliates with respect to such securitized utility tariff bonds; or (i) any application of the formula-based true-up mechanism, in accordance with Section 393.1700.5.(3)(b).

XXX. As provided in Section 393.1700.5.(2)(b), a valid and binding security interest in the securitized utility tariff property in favor of the indenture trustee will be created at the later of the time this Financing Order is issued, the indenture is executed and delivered by the SPE granting such security interest, the SPE has rights in the securitized utility tariff property or the power to transfer rights in the securitized utility tariff

 

105


property, or value is received for the securitized utility tariff property. Upon the filing of a financing statement with the office of the secretary of state as provided in the Securitization Law, a security interest in securitized utility tariff property shall be perfected against all parties having claims of any kind in tort, contract, or otherwise against the person granting the security interest, and regardless of whether the parties have notice of the security interest in accordance with Section 393.1700.5.(2)(c). Without limiting the foregoing, upon such filing a security interest in securitized utility tariff property shall be perfected against all claims of lien creditors, and shall have priority over all competing security interests and other claims other than any security interest previously perfected in accordance with the Securitization Law.

YYY. As provided in Section 393.1700.5.(3)(c), the transfer of an interest in securitized utility tariff property to SPE will be perfected against all third parties, including subsequent judicial or other lien creditors, when a notice of that transfer has been given by the filing of a financing statement in accordance with Section 393.1700.7.

ZZZ. As priority of the sale perfected under Section 393.1700.5. will not be impaired by any later modification of this Financing Order or securitized utility tariff property or by the commingling of funds arising from securitized utility tariff property with other funds. Any other security interest that may apply to those funds, other than a security interest perfected under Section 393.1700.5., is terminated when they are transferred to a segregated account for the SPE or a financing party. Any proceeds of the securitized utility tariff property shall be held in trust for the SPE.

 

106


AAAA.As provided in Section 393.1700.5.(2)(f), if a default occurs under the securitized utility tariff bonds that are securitized by the securitized utility tariff property, the indenture trustee may exercise the rights and remedies available to a secured party under the Missouri Uniform Commercial Code, including the rights and remedies available under part 6 of article 9 of the Missouri Uniform Commercial Code, and (a) the Commission may order that amounts arising from the related securitized utility tariff charges be transferred to a separate account for the indenture trustee’s benefit, to which their lien and security interest may apply and (b) on application by the indenture trustee, the district court of Jackson County, Missouri, will order the sequestration and payment to the indenture trustee of revenues arising from the securitized utility tariff charges.

BBBB.As provided in Section 393.1700.5(2)(f), if a default occurs under the securitized utility tariff bonds, on application by or on behalf of the financing parties, a district court of Jackson County, Missouri, must order the sequestration and payment to those parties of revenues arising from the securitized utility tariff charges. As provided by Section 393.1700.9., (a) neither the State of Missouri nor its political subdivisions are liable on the securitized utility tariff bonds approved under this Financing Order, and the securitized utility tariff bonds are not a debt or a general obligation of the State of Missouri or any of its political subdivisions, agencies, or instrumentalities, nor are they special obligations or indebtedness of the State of Missouri or any agency or political subdivision and (b) the issuance of securitized utility tariff bonds approved under this Financing Order does not, directly, indirectly, or contingently, obligate the State of Missouri or any agency, political subdivision, or instrumentality of the state to levy any tax or make any appropriation for payment of the securitized utility tariff bonds, other than in their capacity as consumers of electricity.

 

107


CCCC. Under Section 393.1700.11.(1), the State of Missouri and its agencies, including the Commission, have pledged for the benefit and protection of bondholders, the owners of the securitized utility tariff property, other financing parties and Evergy West, that the State and its agencies will not (a) alter the provisions of the Securitization Law, (b) take or permit any action that impairs or would impair the value of securitized utility tariff property or the security for the securitized utility tariff bonds or revises the securitized utility tariff costs for which recovery is authorized, (c) in any way impair the rights and remedies of the bondholders, assignees, and other financing parties or (d) except for changes made pursuant to the true-up mechanism authorized under this Financing Order, reduce, alter, or impair securitized utility tariff charges until any and all principal, interest, premium, financing costs and other fees, expenses, or charges incurred, and any contracts to be performed, in connection with the securitized utility tariff bonds have been paid and performed in full. The SPE is authorized under Section 393.1700.11.(2) and this Financing Order to include this pledge in the securitized utility tariff bonds and related documents. The pledge does not preclude limitation or alteration if full compensation is made by law for the full protection of the securitized utility tariff charges collected pursuant to this Financing Order and of the bondholders and any assignee or financing party entering into a contract with Evergy West.

DDDD. This Financing Order will remain in effect and unabated notwithstanding the reorganization, bankruptcy, or other insolvency proceedings, merger or sale of Evergy West, its successors, or assignees.

EEEE. Pursuant to Section 393.1700.2.(3)(a)c., this Financing Order is subject to judicial review only in accordance with Sections 386.500 and 386.510.

 

108


FFFF. This Financing Order meets the requirements for a financing order under Section 393.1700.

Ordering Paragraphs

In accordance with these findings of fact and conclusions of law, the Commission issues the following orders:

Approval

1. Approval of Petition. The petition of Evergy West for the issuance of a financing order under Sections 393.1700 are approved, subject to the conditions and criteria provided in this Financing Order.

2. Authority to Securitize. Evergy West is authorized in accordance with this Financing Order to finance and to cause the issuance of securitized utility tariff bonds with a principal amount equal to the sum of (a) the securitizable balance at the time the securitized utility tariff bonds are issued plus (b) up-front financing costs, which includes (i) underwriters discounts and commissions, (ii) legal costs, (iii) the cost of original issue discount, credit enhancements and other arrangements to enhance marketability as in accordance with ordering paragraph 23, (iv) rating agency fees, (v) United States Securities and Exchange Commission registration fees, and (vi) any costs of the Commission associated with its responsibilities under the Securitization Law in connection with this Financing Order, and in performing its duties in connection with the structuring, marketing and pricing of the securitized utility tariff bonds and the issuance advice letter process (including any costs of the Commission’s designated representatives, financial advisors and other advisors (including outside bond counsel)). The securitizable balance as of any given date is equal to the balance of qualified

 

109


extraordinary costs plus carrying costs accruing at a 5.06 percent long-term debt rate through the date the securitized utility tariff bonds are issued. If the actual up-front financing costs are less than the up-front financing costs included in the aggregate principal amount of the securitized utility tariff bonds, the amount of such unused funds (together with interest, if any, earned from the investment of such funds) will be returned to customers in a general rate proceeding. If the actual up-front financing costs are more than the up-front financing costs included in the aggregate principal amount of the securitized utility tariff bonds, Evergy West will have the right to be reimbursed for such prudently incurred excess amounts through the establishment of a regulatory asset.

3. Recovery of Securitized Utility Tariff Costs. Evergy West is authorized to recover $307,811,246 of its qualified extraordinary costs related to Winter Storm Uri. The up-front financing costs are estimated to be $6.0 million plus the cost of the Commission’s advisors, which will be updated through the issuance advice process.

4. Tracing Funds. Evergy West’s proposed method of tracing funds collected as securitized utility tariff charges, or other proceeds of securitized utility tariff property shall be used to trace such funds and to determine the identifiable cash proceeds of any securitized tariff property subject to this Financing Order under applicable law.

5. Third Party Billing. If the State of Missouri or this Commission decides to allow billing, collection, and remittance of the securitized utility tariff charges by a third-party supplier within Evergy West’s service territory, such authentication will be consistent with the rating agencies’ requirements necessary for the securitized utility tariff bonds to receive and maintain the targeted triple-A rating.

 

110


6. Provision of Information. Evergy West must take all necessary steps to ensure that the Commission and its designated representatives and their financial and other advisors are provided sufficient and timely information as provided in this Financing Order in order to fulfill their obligations under the Securitization Law and this Financing Order.

7. Issuance Advice Letter. Evergy West shall submit a draft issuance advice letter to the Finance Team for review not later than two weeks before the expected date of commencement of marketing the securitized utility tariff bonds; provided that such draft issuance advice letter will be revised as necessary and re-submitted to the Finance Team if the expected date of commencement of marketing is delayed. With the agreement of the Finance Team, the actual date of the commencement of marketing may be a date other than the expected date. The Finance Team will review the draft issuance advice letter and provide timely feedback to Evergy West based on the progression of structuring and marketing of the securitized utility tariff bonds. Not later than one day after the pricing of the securitized utility tariff bonds and before issuance of the securitized utility tariff bonds, Evergy West shall provide the Commission an issuance advice letter in substantially the form of the issuance advice letter attached as Appendix A to this Financing Order. Evergy West and the lead underwriters for the securitized utility tariff bonds shall provide a written certificate to the Commission certifying that the issuance of the securitized utility tariff bonds (i) complies with this Financing Order, (ii) complies with all other applicable legal requirements (including all requirements of Section 393.1700), (iii) that the issuance of the securitized utility tariff bonds and the imposition of the securitized utility tariff charges will provide quantifiable net present value benefits to

 

111


customers as compared to recovery of the components of securitized utility tariff costs that would have been incurred absent the issuance of securitized utility tariff bonds, and (iv) that the structuring, marketing and pricing of the securitized utility tariff bonds will result in the lowest securitized utility tariff charges consistent with market conditions at the time the securitized utility tariff bonds are priced and the terms of this Financing Order. The issuance advice letter must be completed, must evidence the actual dollar amount of the initial securitized utility tariff charges and other information specific to the securitized utility tariff bonds to be issued. The issuance advice letter will demonstrate the ultimate amounts of quantifiable net present value benefits. In addition, if more than de minimis original issue discount, credit enhancements, or arrangements to enhance marketability are used, the issuance advice letter must include certification that such original issue discount, credit enhancements, or other arrangements are reasonably expected to provide benefits as required by this Financing Order. All amounts which require computation shall be computed using the mathematical formulas contained in the form of the issuance advice letter in Appendix A to this Financing Order and the Securitized Utility Tariff Rider. Electronic spreadsheets with the formulas supporting the schedules contained in the issuance advice letter must be included with such letter. The Finance Team may request such revisions to the issuance advice letter as may be necessary to assure the accuracy of the calculations and information included and that the requirements of the Securitization Law and this Financing Order. The initial securitized utility tariff charges and the final terms of the securitized utility tariff bonds set forth in the issuance advice letter will become effective on the date of issuance of the securitized utility tariff bonds (which must not occur before the fifth business day after pricing) unless before noon on the fourth business day after the Commission receives the issuance advice letter, the Commission issues a disapproval letter directing that the securitized utility tariff bonds as proposed shall not be issued and the basis for that disapproval.

 

112


8. Approval of Tariff. The form of Securitized Utility Tariff Rider attached as Appendix B to this order is approved. Before the issuance of any securitized utility tariff bonds under this Financing Order, Evergy West must file compliance tariff sheets that conform to the form of the Securitized Utility Tariff Rider tariff provisions attached to this Financing Order, but with rate elements left blank. With its submission of the issuance advice letter, Evergy West shall also submit a compliance tariff sheet, bearing an effective date no earlier than five business days after its submission, containing the rate elements of the securitized utility tariff charge. That compliance tariff sheet shall become effective on the date the securitized utility tariff bonds are issued with no further action of the Commission unless the Commission issues a disapproval letter as described in Ordering Paragraph 7.

Securitized Utility Tariff Charges

9. Imposition and Collection. Evergy West is authorized to impose on and the servicer is authorized to collect from all existing and future retail customers225 located within Evergy West’s service area as such service area exists on the date this Financing Order is issued and other entities which, under the terms of this Financing Order or the tariffs approved hereby, are required to bill, pay, or collect securitized utility tariff charges, securitized utility tariff charges in an amount sufficient to provide for the timely recovery of the aggregate total securitized revenue requirements (including payment of principal of and interest on the securitized utility tariff bonds), as approved in this Financing Order. If there is a partial payment of an amount billed, the amount paid must first be apportioned ratably between the securitized utility tariff charges and other fees (excluding any late fees), and second, any remaining portion of the payment must be allocated to late fees.

 

225 

Excluding special contract customers as of August 28, 2021.

 

113


10. SPE’s Rights and Remedies. Upon the sale by Evergy West of the securitized utility tariff property to the SPE, the SPE will have all of the rights and interest of Evergy West with respect to such securitized utility tariff property, including, without limitation, the right to exercise any and all rights and remedies with respect thereto, including the right to authorize disconnection of electric service and to assess and collect any amounts payable by any retail customer in respect of the securitized utility tariff property.

11. Collector of Securitized Utility Tariff Charges. Evergy West or any subsequent servicer of the securitized utility tariff bonds shall bill a customer or other entity, which, under the terms of this Financing Order or the tariffs approved hereby, is required to bill or collect securitized utility tariff charges for the securitized utility tariff charges attributable to that customer.

12. Collection Period. The scheduled final payment date of securitized utility tariff bonds may not exceed 15 years and the legal final maturity of such tranche of the securitized utility tariff bonds may extend to 17 years.

13. Allocation. Evergy West shall allocate the securitized utility tariff charges in the manner described in this Financing Order.

14. Nonbypassability. Evergy West shall collect and remit the securitized utility tariff charges in accordance with this Financing Order.

 

114


15. True-Ups. Evergy West shall file true-up adjustments of the securitized utility tariff charges as described in this Financing Order.

16. Ownership Notification. The servicer shall ensure that each retail customer bill that includes the securitized utility tariff charge meets the notification of ownership and separate line item requirements set forth in this Financing Order.

Securitized Utility Tariff Bonds

17. Issuance. Evergy West is authorized to cause the SPE to issue one series of securitized utility tariff bonds as specified in this Financing Order. The securitized utility tariff bonds must be denominated in United States Dollars.

18. Up-front Financing Costs. Evergy West may finance up-front financing costs in accordance with the terms of this Financing Order, which provides that the total amount for up-front financing cost, which includes (i) underwriters’ discounts and commissions, (ii) legal fees, (iii) auditor fees, (iv) structuring advisor fees, (v) the cost of original issue discount, credit enhancements and other arrangements to enhance marketability as discussed in ordering paragraphs 7 and 23, (vi) information technology programming costs, (vii) rating agency fees, (viii) United States Securities and Exchange Commission registration fees, and (ix) any costs of the Commission associated with its responsibilities under the Securitization Law in connection with this Financing Order, and in performing its duties in connection with the structuring, marketing and pricing of the securitized utility tariff bonds and the issuance advice letter process (including any costs of the Commission’s designated representatives, financial advisors and other advisors (including outside counsel)).

 

115


19. Ongoing Financing Costs. Evergy West may recover its actual ongoing financing costs through its securitized utility tariff charges set forth in Appendix C to this Financing Order. The amount of ongoing financing costs is subject to updating in the issuance advice letter in consultation with the Finance Team to reflect a change in the size of the securitized utility tariff bond issuance and other information available at the time of filing the issuance advice letter. As provided in ordering paragraph 30, a servicer, other than Evergy West or its affiliates, may collect a servicing fee higher than that set forth in Appendix C to this Financing Order, if such higher fee is approved by the Commission and the indenture trustee and subject to rating agency conditions.

20. Collateral. All securitized utility tariff property and other collateral must be held and administered by the indenture trustee under the indenture as described in Evergy West’s petition. The SPE must establish a collection account with the indenture trustee as described in finding of fact number [189]. Upon payment of the principal amount of all securitized utility tariff bonds authorized in this Financing Order and the discharge of all obligations in respect thereof, all amounts in the collection account, including investment earnings, must be released by the indenture trustee to the SPE for distribution in accordance with ordering paragraph 21.

21. Distribution Following Repayment. Following repayment of the securitized utility tariff bonds authorized in this Financing Order and release of the funds held by the indenture trustee, the servicer, on behalf of the SPE, must credit to retail customers, the final balance of the subaccounts (other than principal remaining in the capital subaccount), whether such balance is attributable to principal amounts deposited in such subaccounts or to interest thereon, remaining after all other financing costs have been paid. The SPE shall also credit to retail customers any subsequently collected securitized utility tariff charges.

 

116


22. Funding of Capital Subaccount. The capital contribution by Evergy West to be deposited into the capital subaccount shall be funded by Evergy West and not from the proceeds of the sale of securitized utility tariff bonds at an amount not less than 0.50 percent of the original principal amount of the securitized utility tariff bonds and required by tax and rating agency requirements at the time of issuance determined in consultation with the Finance Team. Evergy West is authorized to receive a return on the capital contribution at a WACC of 8.9 percent. Upon payment of the principal amount of all securitized utility tariff bonds and the discharge of all obligations in respect thereof, all amounts in the capital subaccount, will be released to the SPE for payment to Evergy West, with any investment earnings on funds in the capital account to be accounted for in a future reconciliation process under Section 393.1700.2.(3)(c)k.

23. Original Issue Discount, Credit Enhancement. Evergy West may provide original issue discount or provide for various forms of credit enhancement, including letters of credit, an overcollateralization subaccount or other accounts, surety bonds, and other mechanisms designed to promote the credit quality or marketability of the securitized utility tariff bonds to the extent permitted by and subject to the terms of this Financing Order only if Evergy West certifies that such arrangements are reasonably expected to provide benefits greater than their cost and such certifications are agreed with by the Finance Team. Except for a de minimis amount of original issue discount, any decision to use such arrangements to enhance credit or promote marketability must be made in consultation with the Finance Team. Evergy West may not enter into an interest rate swap, currency hedge, or interest rate hedging arrangement. This ordering paragraph does not apply to the collection account or its subaccounts approved in this Financing Order.

 

117


24. Recovery Period. The Commission authorizes Evergy West to recover the securitized utility tariff costs and financing costs over a period not to exceed 17 years from the date the securitized utility tariff bonds are issued, although this does not prohibit recovery of securitized utility tariff charges for service rendered during the 17-year period but not actually collected until after the 17-year period.

25. Amortization Schedule. The securitized utility tariff bonds shall be structured to provide a securitized utility tariff charge that is based on substantially levelized annual revenue requirements over the expected life of the securitized utility tariff bonds and allocated on the basis of loss-adjusted energy sales, subject to modification in accordance with this Financing Order.

26. Finance Team Participation in Bond Issuance. The Commission, acting through its Finance Team, may participate with Evergy West in discussions regarding the structuring, marketing and pricing of the securitized utility tariff bonds. The Finance Team has the right to provide input to Evergy West and collaborate with Evergy West in all facets of the structuring, marketing and pricing bond processes, including but not limited to, (1) the underwriter and any other member of the syndicate group size, selection process, participants, allocations and economics; (2) the structure of the bonds; (3) the bonds credit rating agency application; (4) the underwriters’ preparation, marketing and syndication of the bonds; (5) the pricing of the bonds and the certifications provided by Evergy West and the underwriters; (6) all associated costs, (including up front and

 

118


ongoing financing costs), servicing and administrative fees and associated crediting; (7) bond maturities; (8) reporting templates; (9) the amount of any capital contributions; (10) credit enhancements; and (11) the initial calculations of the securitized utility tariff charges. The foregoing and other items may be reviewed during the entire course of the Finance Team’s process. The Finance Team’s review will begin immediately following this Financing Order becoming non-appealable and will continue until the issuance advice letter becomes effective. The Finance Team will not have authority to direct how Evergy West places the securitized utility tariff bonds to market although they shall be permitted to attend all meetings, participate in all calls, emails, and other communications relating to the structuring, marketing, pricing and issuance of the securitized utility tariff bonds. The Commission retains authority over enforcing the terms of this Financing Order, and the Finance Team’ process may petition the Commission for relief for any actual or threatened violation of the terms of the Financing Order.

27. Use of the SPE. Evergy West must use the SPE, a bankruptcy-remote special purpose entity, to issue the securitized utility tariff bonds authorized under this Financing Order. The SPE must be funded with an amount of capital that is sufficient for the SPE to carry out its intended functions and to avoid the possibility that Evergy West would have to extend funds to the SPE in a manner that could jeopardize the bankruptcy remoteness of SPE.

 

119


Servicing

28. Servicing Agreement. The Commission authorizes Evergy West to enter into the servicing agreement with the SPE and to perform the servicing duties approved in this Financing Order. Without limiting the foregoing, in its capacity as initial servicer of the securitized utility tariff property, Evergy West is authorized to calculate, impose, bill, charge, collect and receive for the account of the SPE, the securitized utility tariff charges authorized in this Financing Order, as adjusted from time to time to meet the total securitized revenue requirements as provided in this Financing Order; and to make such filings and take such other actions as are required or permitted by this Financing Order in connection with the periodic true-up adjustments described in this Financing Order. The servicer is entitled to collect servicing fees in accordance with the provisions of the servicing agreement; provided that the annual servicing fee payable to Evergy West while it is serving as servicer (or to any other servicer affiliated with Evergy West) must not at any time exceed 0.05 percent of the original principal amount of the securitized utility tariff bonds. The annual servicing fee payable to any servicer not affiliated with Evergy West must not at any time exceed 0.60 percent of the original principal amount of the securitized utility tariff bonds unless such higher rate is approved by the Commission and the indenture trustee and subject to rating agency conditions under ordering paragraph 30.

29. Administration Agreement. The Commission authorizes Evergy West to enter into an administration agreement with the SPE to provide the services covered by the administration agreements. The fee charged by Evergy West as administrator under that agreement must not exceed $50,000 per annum plus reimbursable third-party costs.

 

120


30. Replacement of Evergy West as Servicer. Upon the occurrence of a servicer termination event under the servicing agreement, the financing parties may replace Evergy West as the servicer in accordance with the terms of the servicing agreement. The servicing fee of the replacement servicer shall not exceed the applicable maximum servicing fee unless approved as specified in ordering paragraph 28, the replacement servicer must not begin providing service until the date the Commission approves the appointment of such replacement servicer. No entity may replace Evergy West as the servicer in any of its servicing functions with respect to the securitized utility tariff charges and the securitized utility tariff property authorized by this Financing Order, if the replacement would cause any of the then current credit ratings of the securitized utility tariff bonds to be suspended, withdrawn, or downgraded.

31. Amendment of Agreements. The parties to the servicing agreement, administration agreement, indenture, and securitized utility tariff property purchase and sale agreement may amend the terms of such agreements; provided that no amendment to any such agreement increases the ongoing financing costs without the approval of the Commission. Any amendment to any such agreement that may have the effect of increasing ongoing financing costs must be provided by the SPE to the Commission along with a statement as to the possible effect of the amendment on the ongoing financing costs.

32. Collection Terms. The servicer shall remit collections of the securitized utility tariff charges to the SPE or the indenture trustee for the SPE’s account in accordance with the terms of the servicing agreement.

33. Federal Securities Law Requirements. Each other entity responsible for collecting securitized utility tariff charges from retail customers must furnish to the SPE or Evergy West or to any successor servicer information and documents necessary to enable the SPE or Evergy West or any successor servicer to comply with their respective disclosure and reporting requirements, if any, with respect to the securitized utility tariff bonds under federal securities laws.

 

121


Structure of the Securitization

34. Structure. Evergy West shall structure the issuance of the securitized utility tariff bonds and the imposition and collection of the securitized utility tariff charges as set forth in this Financing Order.

Use of Proceeds

35. Use of Proceeds. Upon the issuance of securitized utility tariff bonds, the SPE shall pay the net proceeds from the sale of the securitized utility tariff bonds (after payment of up-front financing costs) to pay Evergy West the purchase price of the securitized utility tariff property. Evergy West shall use the proceeds from the sale of the securitized utility tariff property to recover the qualified extraordinary costs incurred by Evergy West in connection with the anomalous weather event Winter Storm Uri approved herein.

Miscellaneous Provisions

36. Continuing Issuance Right. In accordance with Section 393.1700.2(3)(c)n., Evergy West has the continuing irrevocable right to cause the issuance of securitized utility tariff bonds in one series in accordance with this Financing Order for a period commencing with the date of this Financing Order and extending 24 months following the date on which this Financing Order becomes final and no longer subject to any appeal. If, at any time during the effective period of this Financing Order, there is a severe disruption in the financial markets of the United States, the effective period may be extended with the approval of the Commission’s designated representatives to a date which is not less than 90 days after the date such disruption ends.

 

122


37. Binding on Successors. This Financing Order, together with the securitized utility tariff charges authorized in it, shall be binding on Evergy West and any successor to Evergy West that provides transmission and distribution service directly to retail customers in Evergy West’s service area as it exists on the date of this Financing Order, any other entity that provides transmission or distribution services to retail customers within that service area, and any successor to such other entity. In this paragraph, a successor means any entity that succeeds to any interest or obligation of its predecessor, including by way of bankruptcy, reorganization or other insolvency proceeding, merger, consolidation, conversion, assignment, pledge or other security, by operation of law or otherwise.

38. Flexibility. Subject to compliance with the requirements of this Financing Order, Evergy West and the SPE are afforded flexibility in establishing the terms and conditions of the securitized utility tariff bonds, including the final structure of the SPE, repayment schedules, term, payment dates, collateral, credit enhancement, required debt service, interest rates, use of original issue discount, and other financing costs.

39. Effectiveness of Order. This Financing Order will become effective on November 27, 2022. However, no securitized utility tariff property is created hereunder, and Evergy West is not authorized to impose, collect, and receive securitized utility tariff charges until the securitized utility tariff property has been sold to the SPE in conjunction with the issuance of the securitized utility tariff bonds.

 

123


40. Regulatory Approvals. All regulatory approvals within the jurisdiction of the Commission that are necessary for the recovery of the approved securitized utility tariff charges associated with the securitized utility tariff costs that are the subject of the petition and for all related transactions contemplated in the petition are granted

41. Payment of Commission’s Costs for Professional Services. Evergy West shall pay all costs of the Commission in connection with the petition, this Financing Order and the proposed transaction, including, but not limited to, the Commission’s outside attorneys’ fees and the fees of any financial or other advisors from the proceeds of the securitized utility tariff bonds on the date of issuance as up-front financing costs.

42. Effect. This Financing Order constitutes a legal financing order for Evergy West under the Securitization Law. The Commission finds this Financing Order complies with the Securitization Law. A financing order gives rise to rights, interests, obligations, and duties as expressed in the Securitization Law. It is the Commission’s express intent to give rise to those rights, interests, obligations, and duties by issuing this Financing Order. Evergy West and the SPE are directed to take all actions as are required to effectuate the transactions approved in this Financing Order, subject to compliance with the conditions and criteria established in this Financing Order.

43. Rejection of the Stipulation. The Non-Unanimous Stipulation and Agreement submitted by Evergy West, Staff, and Public Counsel on August 1, 2022, is rejected and the Commission does not adopt it as the resolution of any issue contained therein.

44. All Other Motions Denied. The Commission denies all other motions and any other requests for general or specific relief that have not been expressly granted.

 

124


45. This report and order shall become effective on November 27, 2022.

 

LOGO    

BY THE COMMISSION

 

   

/s/ Morris L. Woodruff

   

Morris L. Woodruff

Secretary

 
Silvey, Chm., Rupp, Coleman, Holsman, and Kolkmeyer CC., concur and certify compliance with the provisions of Section 536.080, RSMo (2016).    
Clark, Senior Regulatory Law Judge    

 

125


FORM OF ISSUANCE ADVICE LETTER

                    Day of                2023

Case No.                                

MISSOURI PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

SUBJECT: ISSUANCE ADVICE LETTER FOR SECURITIZED UTILITY TARIFF BONDS

Pursuant to the Financing Order adopted in Petition of Evergy Missouri West, Inc. d/b/a Evergy Missouri West for a Financing Order, Case No. (the “Financing Order”), EVERGY MISSOURI WEST, INC. D/B/A EVERGY MISSOURI WEST (“Petitioner”) hereby submits, no later than one day after the pricing date of the Securitized Utility Tariff Bonds, the information referenced below. This Issuance Advice Letter is for the 202[3] Securitized Utility Tariff Bonds, tranches A-1 through A-[    ]. Any capitalized terms not defined in this letter have the meanings ascribed to them in the Financing Order.

PURPOSE

This filing establishes the following:

 

  (a)

the total amount of Securitized Utility Tariff Costs and Financing Costs being financed;

 

  (b)

the amounts of quantifiable net present value savings;

 

  (c)

confirmation of compliance with issuance standards;

 

  (d)

the actual terms and structure of the Securitized Utility Tariff Bonds being issued;

 

  (e)

the initial Securitized Utility Tariff Charge for retail customers; and

 

  (f)

the identification of the Special Purpose Entity (SPE).

SECURITIZED UTILITY TARIFF COSTS AND FINANCING COSTS BEING FINANCED

The total amount of Securitized Utility Tariff Costs and Financing Costs being financed (the “Securitized Costs”) is presented in Attachment 1.

COMPLIANCE WITH ISSUANCE STANDARDS

The Financing Order requires Petitioner to confirm, using the methodology approved therein, that the actual terms of the Securitized Utility Tariff Bonds result in compliance with the standards set forth in the Financing Order. These standards are:

 

  1.

The financing of Qualified Extraordinary Costs and Financing Costs will provide quantifiable net present value benefits to retail customers, greater than would be achieved compared to the customary method of financing with respect to the Qualified Extraordinary Costs in retail customer rates (See Attachment 2, Schedule D);

 

Appendix A


  2.

The Securitized Utility Tariff Bonds will be issued in one series comprised of one or more tranches having a scheduled final payment of years and legal final maturities not exceeding years from the date of issuance of such series (See Attachment 2, Schedule A);

 

  3.

The Securitized Utility Tariff Bonds may be issued with an original issue discount, additional credit enhancements, or arrangements to enhance marketability provided that the Petitioner certifies that the original issue discount, additional credit enhancements, or arrangements to enhance marketability will provide quantifiable net present value benefits greater than its cost; and

 

  4.

The structuring, marketing and pricing of the Securitized Utility Tariff Bonds is certified by the Petitioner to result in the lowest Securitized Utility Tariff Charges consistent with market conditions at the time the Securitized Utility Tariff Bonds were priced and the terms of the Financing Order.

 

  5.

The amount of [Securitized Utility Tariff Costs] to be financed using Securitized Utility Tariff Bonds are $    .

 

  6.

The recovery of such Securitized Utility Tariff Costs is just and reasonable and in the public interest.

 

  7.

The estimate of the amount of Financing Costs that may be recovered through Securitized Utility Tariff Charges is $    .

 

  8.

The period over which the Securitized Utility Tariff Costs and Financing Costs may be recovered is years.

 

  9.

Add other findings from Section 393.1700.2.(3)(c).

 

Appendix A


ACTUAL TERMS OF ISSUANCE

Securitized Utility Tariff Bonds:                                                                             

Securitized Utility Tariff Bond Issuer: [SPE]

Trustee:                                     

Closing Date:                         , 202[3]

Bond Ratings: [S&P AAA(sf), Moody’s Aaa(sf)]

Amount Issued: $                        

Securitized Utility Tariff Bond Upfront Financing Costs: See Attachment 1, Schedule B.

Securitized Utility Tariff Bond Ongoing Financing Costs: See Attachment 2, Schedule B.

 

Tranche    Coupon Rate   

Scheduled Final

Payment

   Legal Final Maturity
A-1    — %      

 

Effective Annual Weighted Average Interest Rate of the Securitized Utility Tariff Bonds:

   [        ]%

Life of the Securitized Utility Tariff Bonds:

                       Years

Weighted Average Life of the Securitized Utility Tariff Bonds:

                       Years

Call provisions (including premium, if any):

   N/A

Target Amortization Schedule:

   Attachment 2, Schedule A

Scheduled Final Payment Dates:

   Attachment 2, Schedule A

Legal Final Maturity Dates:

   Attachment 2, Schedule A

Payments to Investors:

   Semi-annually Beginning 

                    ,  20__

Initial annual Servicing Fee as a percent of original Securitized Utility Tariff Bond principal balance:

   [0.05]%

 

Appendix A


INITIAL SECURITIZED UTILITY TARIFF CHARGE

Table I below shows the current assumptions for each of the variables used in the calculation of the initial Securitized Utility Tariff Charges.

 

TABLE I

 

Input Values For Initial Securitized Utility Tariff

Charges

 

 

Applicable period: from                    to                     

  

Forecasted retail kWh/kW sales for the applicable period:

   $                        

Securitized Utility Tariff Bond debt service for the applicable period

   $                        

Percent of billed amounts expected to be charged-off:

   $                        

Forecasted % of Billing Paid in the Applicable Period:

   $                        

Forecasted retail kWh/kW sales billed and collected for the applicable period.

   $                        

Forecasted annual ongoing financing costs (excluding debt service):

   $                        

Initial Securitized Utility Tariff Bond outstanding balance:

   $                        

Target Securitized Utility Tariff Bond outstanding balance as of:

        /         /         :

   $                        

Total Securitized Revenue Requirement for applicable period:

   $                        

IDENTIFICATION OF SPE

The owner of the Securitized Utility Tariff Property will be:                             [SPE].

EFFECTIVE DATE

In accordance with the Financing Order, the Securitized Utility Tariff Charge shall be automatically effective upon the Petitioner’s receipt of payment in the amount of $_____ from [SPE], following Petitioner’s execution and delivery to [SPE] of the Bill of Sale transferring Petitioner’s rights and interests under the Financing Order and other rights and interests that will become Securitized Utility Tariff Property upon transfer to [SPE] as described in the Financing Order.

 

Appendix A


NOTICE

Copies of this filing are being furnished to the parties on the attached service list. Notice to the public is hereby given by filing and keeping this filing open for public inspection at Petitioner’s corporate headquarters.

AUTHORIZED OFFICER

The undersigned is an officer of Petitioner and authorized to deliver this Issuance Advice Letter on behalf of Petitioner.

 

Respectfully submitted,
         EVERGY MISSOURI WEST, INC. D/B/A
  EVERGY MISSOURI WEST
         By:  

 

         Name:  

 

         Title:  

 

 

Appendix A


ATTACHMENT 1

SCHEDULE A

CALCULATION OF SECURITIZED UTILITY TARIFF COSTS

AND FINANCING COSTS

Securitized Utility Tariff Costs to be financed: $                    

Upfront Financing Costs $                    

TOTAL COSTS TO BE FINANCED $                    

 

Appendix A


ATTACHMENT 1

SCHEDULE B

ESTIMATED UPFRONT FINANCING COSTS

 

UP-FRONT FINANCING COSTS

  

Legal Fees (Company, Issuer, Trustee, and Underwriter)

   $                    

Underwriters’ Fees

   $                    

Auditor’s Fee

   $                    

Structuring Advisor’s Fee

   $                    

Information Technology Programming Costs

   $                    

Costs of the Commission

   $                    

Original Issue Discount

   $                    

SEC Registration Fee

   $                    

SEC Registration Fee

   $                    

Bond Rating Fees

   $                    

Miscellaneous

   $                    

TOTAL UP-FRONT FINANCING COSTS FINANCED

   $                    

Note: Differences that result from the Estimated Up-front Financing Costs financed being more or less than the Actual Upfront Financing Costs incurred will be resolved through the process described in the Financing Order.

 

Appendix A


ATTACHMENT 2

SCHEDULE A

SECURITIZED UTILITY TARIFF BOND REVENUE REQUIREMENT

INFORMATION

TRANCHE

 

Payment Date

   Principal
Balance
     Interest      Principal      Total Payment  
   $                               

                     

                               $                          $                          $                      

                     

                                                                                                               

                     

                                                                                                               

                     

                                                                                                               

                     

                                                                                                               

 

Appendix A


ATTACHMENT 2

SCHEDULE B

ONGOING FINANCING COSTS

 

     ANNUAL AMOUNT  

Servicing Fee (Evergy Missouri West as Servicer) (0.05% of initial Securitized Utility Tariff Bond principal amount)

   $                        

Administration Fee

   $                        

Trustee’s/Trustee’s Counsel Fees and Expenses

   $                        

Auditing/Accounting Fees

   $                        

Legal Fees/Expenses

   $                        

Rating Agency Surveillance Fees

   $                        

Return on Capital Account

   $                        

Printing/Edgarizing Fees

   $                        

Independent Director’s or Manager’s Fees

   $                        

Miscellaneous

   $                        

TOTAL ONGOING FINANCING COSTS (with Evergy Missouri West as Servicer)

   $                        

Ongoing Servicers Fee (Third Party as Servicer) (0.60% of principal amount)

   $                        

TOTAL ONGOING FINANCING COSTS (Third Party as Servicer

   $                        

Note: The amounts shown for each category of operating expense on these attachments are the expected expenses for the first year of the Securitized Utility Tariff Bonds. Securitized Utility Tariff Charges will be adjusted at least annually to reflect any changes in Ongoing Financing Costs through the true-up process described in the Financing Order.

 

Appendix A


ATTACHMENT 2

SCHEDULE C

CALCULATION OF SECURITIZED UTILITY TARIFF CHARGES

 

Year

   Securitized Utility
Tariff Bond
Payments1
     Ongoing Costs2      Total Nominal
Securitized
Utility Tariff
Charge
Requirement3
     Present Value of
Securitized
Utility Tariff
Charges4
 

1

   $                        $                        $                        $                    

2

   $                        $                        $                        $                    

3

   $                        $                        $                        $                    

4

   $                        $                        $                        $                    

5

   $                        $                        $                        $                    

6

   $                        $                        $                        $                    

7

   $                        $                        $                        $                    

8

   $                        $                        $                        $                    

9

   $                        $                        $                        $                    

10

   $                        $                        $                        $                    

11

   $                        $                        $                        $                    

12

   $                        $                        $                        $                    

13

   $                        $                        $                        $                    

14

   $                        $                        $                        $                    

Total

   $                        $                        $                        $                    

 

1 

From Attachment 2, Schedule A.

2 

From Attachment 2, Schedule B.

3 

Sum of Securitized Utility Tariff Bond payments and ongoing costs.

4 

Calculated in accordance with the methodology cited in the Financing Order.

 

Appendix A


ATTACHMENT 2

SCHEDULE D

COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 393.1700

Quantifiable Benefits Test:5

 

     Securitization     FAC/PISA
20 years
    Amortization: 15
Years
 

Storm Uri costs (incl. carrying)

   $ [ •]    $ [ •]    $ [ •] 

Up-front financing costs

   $ [ •]        —    

Total

   $ [ •]    $ [ •]    $ [ •] 

Carrying cost

     [ •]%      [ •]%      [ •]% 

Term (years)

     [ •]      [ •]      [ •] 

Monthly payment

   $ [ •]     

Ongoing costs (monthly)

   $ [ •]      $ [ •] 

Monthly revenue requirement

   $ [ •]    $ [ •]    $ [ •] 

Total payments/Collected

   $ [ •]    $ [ •]    $ [ •] 

Securitization benefit

     $ [ •]    $ [ •] 

Discount Rate (5.06%)

     [ •]%      [ •]%      [ •]% 

NPV payments discounted

   $ [ •]     

@ Discount Rate

     $ [ •]    $ [ •] 

NPV securitization benefit

     $ [ •]    $ [ •] 

 

 

5 

Calculated in accordance with the methodology cited in the Financing Order.

 

Appendix A


EVERGY MISSOURI WEST, INC. d/b/a EVERGY MISSOURI WEST

P.S.C. MO. No.                                                      

  Revised Sheet No.                    
Canceling P.S.C. MO. No.                                                         Original Sheet No.                    
 

For Missouri Retail Service

SECURITIZED UTILITY TARIFF

RIDER

APPLICABILITY

The Securitized Utility Tariff Rider is a non-bypassable charge paid by all existing or future retail customers receiving electrical service from an electrical corporation or its successors or assignees under Commission-approved rate schedules (except for customers receiving electrical service under special contracts on August 28, 2021), even if a customer elects to purchase electricity from an alternative electricity supplier following a fundamental change in regulation of public utilities in Missouri.

The Securitized Utility Tariff Rider will be applicable to customers newly served by the Company due to organic growth within its existing service territory or expansion of the Company’s service territory by way of a new certificate of convenience and necessity or a new territorial agreement. The Securitized Utility Tariff Rider will not apply to customers in other utility jurisdictions merged with, or acquired by, the Company in the future. This charge will continue to be applicable to any customers (new or existing) currently served by the Company, but subsequently served by some other electric service provider as a result of a territorial agreement or modification of a territorial agreement, whether the other electric service provider is regulated by this Commission or exempted from regulation by this Commission by any current or future law. In such instance applicable kWh shall be included in all applicable calculations contained herein.

The Securitized Utility Tariff Rider is applicable to energy consumed under the Company’s various rate schedules, except for customers receiving electrical service under special contracts as of August 28, 2021. Charges pursuant to this Schedule SUR shall be presented on each customer’s bill as a separate line item including the rate applicable to each kWh and the amount of the total charge. Schedule SUR shall remain applicable to each kWh for so long as the securitized utility tariff bonds are outstanding and until all financing costs have been paid in full, and any necessary true-ups have been made.

Schedule SUR was authorized in Case No. EF-2022-0155, The Petition of Evergy Missouri West, Inc. d/b/a Evergy Missouri West for a Financing Order Authorizing the Financing of Qualified Extraordinary Storm Costs Through an Issuance of Securitized Utility Tariff Bonds. A Special Purpose Entity (“SPE”), or its successors or assignees, as applicable, is the owner of the securitized utility tariff property which includes all rights to impose, bill, charge, collect, and receive the relevant Securitized Utility Tariff Charge and to obtain periodic adjustment to such charges. Company, as servicer or other third-party servicer, shall act as SPE’s collection agent for the relevant Securitized Utility Tariff Charge, separate and apart from the other rates, riders, and charges specified in this Tariff.

 

Issued:        Effective:
Issued by:   Darrin R. Ives, Vice President    1200 Main, Kansas City, MO 64105

Appendix B


EVERGY MISSOURI WEST, INC. d/b/a EVERGY MISSOURI WEST

P.S.C. MO. No.                                                      

  Revised Sheet No.                    
Canceling P.S.C. MO. No.                                                         Original Sheet No.                    
 

For Missouri Retail Service

SECURITIZED UTILITY TARIFF

RIDER

 

APPLICABILITY (continued)

Rates under this Schedule SUR will be adjusted no less frequently than annually in order to ensure that the expected collection of amounts authorized in Case No. EF-2022-0155 is adequate to pay when due, pursuant to the expected amortization schedule, principal and interest on the bonds and pay on a timely basis other financing costs. Schedule SUR rates shall be calculated by dividing the total securitized revenue requirement by the forecasted period projected sales at generation voltage and multiplied by the voltage expansion factor, as shown in the following formula:

SURRx = ((TSRR + CARP + True-Up AmountNextRP) ÷ SRP ) × VAFx

where,

SURR = Schedule SUR Rate for the period, applicable to indicated VAF;

TSRR = Total Securitized Revenue Requirement shall consist of the following items:

1. Principal

2. Interest

3. [INSERT ADDITIONAL ITEMS AS DETAILED IN FINANCING ORDER PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BONDS], and

4. Bad debts net of prior period collections.

5. For each of the above, separately, any variations calculated through a reconciliation of the current period TSRR actuals to the projections, forecasts, or estimates to the extent that actuals are available.

 

  CARP

= An allowance to the extent necessary to align revenue recovery with payment obligations. This allowance will be returned to ratepayers when no longer necessary;

 

  SRP

= Forecasted recovery period retail sales to all applicable customers, at the generation level;

 

  VAFx

= Expansion factor by voltage level1 

VAFTrans = Expansion factor for transmission voltage customers

VAFSub = Expansion factor for substation to transmission voltage

customers VAFPrim = Expansion factor for primary to substation voltage

customers VAFSec = Expansion factor for lower than primary voltage customers

 

1 

In the event more delineated voltage adjustments become implemented in the Fuel Adjustment Clause, such service levels shall be incorporated into this rider at the next true-up.

 

Issued:        Effective:
Issued by:   Darrin R. Ives, Vice President    1200 Main, Kansas City, MO 64105

Appendix B


EVERGY MISSOURI WEST, INC. d/b/a EVERGY MISSOURI WEST

P.S.C. MO. No.                                                      

  Revised Sheet No.                    
Canceling P.S.C. MO. No.                                                         Original Sheet No.                    
 

For Missouri Retail Service

SECURITIZED UTILITY TARIFF

RIDER

 

RECOVERY PERIODS

“Recovery Period” (RP) means the period for which a given SURR tariff sheet is in effect. The initial Recovery Period shall begin on the effective date of the first tariff providing an effective SURR, and conclude the day prior to the next occurring [Insert the first calendar day of 2 months 6 months apart to optimize operation in conjunction with payment dates]. Subsequent RPs will occur until all TSRR has been paid in full.

RPs will generally begin [INDICATED DATES], unless required to accommodate a True-Up, and will be 12 months in duration unless required to accommodate a True-Up. If an RP is less than 12 months in duration the Recovery Period Amount and related calculations shall be prorated accordingly.

To accommodate timing of SURR tariff sheet filings, some required data contemplated to be actual may be projected as of the time of filing. To the extent projected data for one or more months is used to calculate subsequent SURRs, in subsequent SURR filings such projections will be reconciled against actual data as it becomes available.

TRUE-UP

The Company as servicer shall file proposed SURR tariff sheets implementing a True-Up and bearing a 30-day effective date, no less frequently than annually. At the servicer’s discretion, SURR tariff sheet filings implementing a True-Up may be made semi-annually, or more frequently, by tariff filing bearing a 30-day effective date. All supporting materials shall be included in such filings. Workpapers and necessary documentation supporting each element of the TSRR shall be included under affidavit with each SURR tariff sheet filing. If cost to Evergy to perform its servicing and administrative services under the Servicing Agreement and the Administration Agreement is less than what the Company is paid for those services, then that difference in cost shall be tracked by Evergy and included in a regulatory liability account to be addressed in Evergy’s next general rate case.

The Company shall time the tariff filing such that the effective date of the tariff is the first day of a calendar month.

SURR tariff sheet filings implementing a True-Up and incorporating revised SURRs calculations shall be made quarterly beginning twelve months prior to the final scheduled payment date of the last tranche of the securitized utility tariff bonds.

 

Issued:        Effective:
Issued by:   Darrin R. Ives, Vice President    1200 Main, Kansas City, MO 64105

Appendix B


EVERGY MISSOURI WEST, INC. d/b/a EVERGY MISSOURI WEST

P.S.C. MO. No.                                                      

  Revised Sheet No.                    
Canceling P.S.C. MO. No.                                                         Original Sheet No.                    
 

For Missouri Retail Service

SECURITIZED UTILITY TARIFF

RIDER

 

TRUE-UP AND SURR TARIFF SHEET FILING FORMULA

True-Up AmountNextRP = Periodic Payment RequirementCurrent RP – SUTC

RemittncesCurrentRP Where;

Periodic Payment Requirement = The portion of the TSRR used to calculate the current SURRs applicable to the current RP.

SUTC Remittances = The SUR revenue received or projected to be received during the current RP resulting from the application of current SURR.

To accommodate timing of SURR tariff sheet filings, some required data contemplated to be actual may be projected as of the time of filing. To the extent projected data for one or more months is used to calculate subsequent SURRs, in subsequent SURR filings such projections will be reconciled against actual data as it becomes available.

At the time of each True-Up, the servicer will provide a new TSRR amount for the coming RP which shall incorporate any variations calculated through a reconciliation of the current period TSRR actuals to the projections, forecasts, or estimates to the extent that actuals are available. The Company will provide its best available SRP forecast, and all supporting information.

To accommodate RPs of varying lengths and true-up of projected data, SRP forecasts by calendar month relied upon for SURR tariff sheet calculation shall be provided to Staff and retained by the Company.

 

Issued:        Effective:
Issued by:   Darrin R. Ives, Vice President    1200 Main, Kansas City, MO 64105

Appendix B


EVERGY MISSOURI WEST, INC. d/b/a EVERGY MISSOURI WEST

P.S.C. MO. No.                                                      

  Revised Sheet No.                    
Canceling P.S.C. MO. No.                                                         Original Sheet No.                    
 

For Missouri Retail Service

SECURITIZED UTILITY TARIFF

RIDER

 

ADDITIONAL TERMS

 

  1.

Treatment of partial payments on customer bills – the first dollars collected would be attributed to past due balances, if any. To the extent that a customer remits an amount less than the full amount due for a given prior or current period, the charges under Schedule SUR shall be prorated with other amounts due for that given prior or current period bill.

 

  2.

Treatment for Net Metering Rates – For customers subject to billing under the Net-metering Easy Connection Act (Act), if the electricity supplied by the Company exceeds the electricity generated by the customer-generator during a billing period, the customer-generator shall be billed to the applicable SURR for each kWh as netted pursuant to the terms of the Act and this tariff. If the electricity generated by the customer-generator exceeds the electricity generated by the customer-generator during a billing period, the customer shall not be issued a credit based on the SURR applicable to each kWh as netted pursuant to the terms of the Act and this tariff, nor shall the SURR be considered to be part of the avoided fuel cost of the Company for purposes of the Act. For customers who are authorized to back-flow energy under some other provision of law, or for any portion of back-flowed energy that exceeds that authorized under the terms of applicable net-metering provisions, the SURR shall be applicable to each kWh provided by the Company, without any offset.

 

  3.

Inapplicability of Discounts – Charges under Schedule SUR are payable in full and are not eligible for any discount.

 

  4.

Filing Procedure

Initial Rate Filing: In accordance with the provisions of sections 393.1700.2(3)(c)i and 393.1700.2(3)(h), prior to the issuance of bonds, the Company shall submit to the Commission, no later than one business day after the pricing of the securitized utility tariff bonds, an issuance advice letter and revised Schedule SUR tariff bearing a proposed effective date being the date the securitized utility tariff bonds are to be issued. The issuance advice letter shall report the initial securitized utility tariff charges and other information specific to the securitized utility tariff bonds to be issued, as the Commission may require. The Company may proceed with the issuance of the securitized utility tariff bonds unless, prior to noon on the fourth business day after receipt of the issuance advice letter, the Commission issues a disapproval letter directing that the securitized utility tariff bonds as proposed shall not be issued and the basis for that disapproval.

For all filings - On or before each filing, the Company shall prepare and file under affidavit the workpapers and supporting documentation supporting the Total Securitized Revenue Requirement and SUR Rates being filed, ensuring that all SUR Rates in effect for a current period are published at all times bills are rendered for service at that rate, and an SUR Rate is not applied to usage that occurred prior to the effective date of the SUR Rate.

 

Issued:        Effective:
Issued by:   Darrin R. Ives, Vice President    1200 Main, Kansas City, MO 64105

Appendix B


EVERGY MISSOURI WEST, INC. d/b/a EVERGY MISSOURI WEST

P.S.C. MO. No.                                                      

  Revised Sheet No.                    
Canceling P.S.C. MO. No.                                                         Original Sheet No.                    
 

For Missouri Retail Service

SECURITIZED UTILITY TARIFF

RIDER

 

SECURITIZED REVENUE REQUIREMENT AND SUR RATE

These rates shall apply to the Billing Months on and after [NAME OF CALENDAR MONTH FOLLOWING SHEET EFFECTIVE DATE].

EXAMPLE LINE NAMES AND AMOUNTS

[AFTER INITIAL FILING, ALTERNATE BETWEEN TWO SHEETS TO MAINTAIN

PRESENCE IN TARIFF OF EFFECTIVE RATES DURING OVERLAP MONTH]

 

1    Principal and Interest       $ 33,483,107  
2    Prior Securitized Revenue Requirement True-Up Amount      +      $ 0  
3    Other Financing Costs      +      $ 0  
4    Total Securitized Revenue Requirement      =      $ 33,483,107  
5    Forecasted Sales at Generation Level (SRP) for December 2021 through November 2021      ÷        8,848,730,509  
6    SUR Rate      =      $ 0.00378  
   Loss Adjusted SUR Rates      
7    Secondary (SUR Rate x VAFSec 1.0426) per kWh      =      $ 0.00395  
8    Primary (SUR Rate x VAFPrim 1.0268) per kWh      =      $ 0.00389  
9    Substation (SUR Rate x VAFSub 1.0133) per kWh      =      $ 0.00383  
10    Transmission (SUR Rate x VAFTrans 1.0100) per kWh      =      $ 0.00382  

 

Issued:        Effective:
Issued by:   Darrin R. Ives, Vice President    1200 Main, Kansas City, MO 64105

Appendix B


ESTIMATED UPFRONT FINANCING COSTS

 

UPFRONT FINANCING COSTS

  

Legal Fees (Company, Issuer, Trustee, and Underwriter)

   $ 3,025,000  

Auditor’s Fee

   $ 1,000,000  

Structuring Advisor Fee

   $ 200,000  

Information Technology Programming Costs

   $ 70,000  

Costs of the Commission

   $ TBD  

Original Issue Discount

   $ TBD  

Underwriters’ Fees

     0.40

SEC Registration Fees

     0.00920

Bond Rating Fees

     0.1325

Miscellaneous

   $ 90,000  

TOTAL UPFRONT FINANCING COSTS FINANCED

   $ 6,025,312  

Appendix C

 


ESTIMATED UPFRONT FINANCING COSTS

 

ESTIMATED ONGOING FINANCING COSTS

 

     ANNUAL
AMOUNT
 

Servicing Fee (Evergy Missouri West as Servicer) (0.05% of initial Securitized Utility Tariff Bond principal amount)

     0.05

Administration Fee

   $ 75,000  

Trustee’s/Trustee’s Counsel Fees and Expenses

   $ 5,000  

Auditing/Accounting Fees

   $ 75,000  

Legal Fees/Expenses

   $ 35,000  

Rating Agency Surveillance Fees

   $ 45,000  

Return on Capital Account

     0.34

Printing/Edgarizing Fees

   $ 10,000  

Independent Manager’s Fees

   $ TBD  

Miscellaneous

   $ 10,000  

TOTAL ONGOING FINANCING COSTS (with Evergy Missouri West as Servicer)

   $ 508,905  

Ongoing Servicers Fee (Third Party as Servicer) (0.60% of principal amount)

   $ 0.60

TOTAL ONGOING FINANCING COSTS (Third Party as Servicer)

   $ 2,174,340  

 

Appendix C


ESTIMATED UPFRONT FINANCING COSTS

 

STATE OF MISSOURI

OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

I have compared the preceding copy with the original on file in this office and I do hereby certify the same to be a true copy therefrom and the whole thereof.

WITNESS my hand and seal of the Public Service Commission, at Jefferson City, Missouri, this 17th day of November, 2022.

 

LOGO

  

/s/ Morris L. Woodruff

  

Morris L. Woodruff

Secretary


MISSOURI PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

November 17, 2022

File/Case No. EF-2022-0155

 

Missouri Public Service    Office of the Public Counsel    Evergy Missouri West
Commission    Marc Poston    James M Fischer
Staff Counsel Department    200 Madison Street, Suite 650    101 Madison Street, Suite 400
200 Madison Street, Suite 800    P.O. Box 2230    Jefferson City, MO 65101
P.O. Box 360    Jefferson City, MO 65102    jfischerpc@aol.com
Jefferson City, MO 65102    opcservice@opc.mo.gov   
staffcounselservice@psc.mo.gov      
Evergy Missouri West    Evergy Missouri West    Evergy Missouri West
Roger W Steiner    Jacqueline Whipple    Karl Zobrist
1200 Main Street, 16th Floor    4520 Main Street, Ste. 1100    4520 Main Street, Suite 1100
P.O. Box 418679    Kansas City, MO 64111    Kansas City, MO 64111
Kansas City, MO 64105-9679    jacqueline.whipple@dentons.com    karl.zobrist@dentons.com
roger.steiner@evergy.com      
Midwest Energy Consumers Group    Missouri Industrial Energy Consumers (MIEC)    Missouri Public Service Commission
Tim Opitz    Diana M Plescia    Jeff Keevil
308 E. High Street, Suite B101    130 S. Bemiston, Suite 200    200 Madison Street, Suite 800
Jefferson City, MO 65101    St. Louis, MO 63105    P.O. Box 360
tim.opitz@opitzlawfirm.com    dplescia@chgolaw.com    Jefferson City, MO 65102
      jeff.keevil@psc.mo.gov
Nucor Steel Sedalia, LLC    Nucor Steel Sedalia, LLC    Nucor Steel Sedalia, LLC
Marc H Ellinger    Michael K Lavanga    Peter J Mattheis
308 E. High Street, Ste. 300    1025 Thomas Jefferson Street NW    1025 Thomas Jefferson Street NW
Jefferson City, MO 65101    Washington, DC 20007    Washington, DC 20007
mellinger@ellingerlaw.com    mkl@smxblaw.com    PJM@smxblaw.com
Office of the Public Counsel    Velvet Tech Services, LLC   
Lindsay VanGerpen    Stephanie S Bell   
200 Madison Street, Suite 650    308 East High Street, Suite 300   
P.O. Box 2230    Jefferson City, MO 65101   
Jefferson City, MO 65102    sbell@ellingerlaw.com   
Lindsay.vangerpen@opc.mo.gov      

Enclosed find a certified copy of an Order or Notice issued in the above-referenced matter(s).

 

Sincerely,

 

/s/ Morris L. Woodruff

Morris L. Woodruff
Secretary

 

Recipients listed above with a valid e-mail address will receive electronic service. Recipients without a valid e-mail address will receive paper service.

Exhibit 107.1

Calculation of Filing Fee Table

Form SF-1

(Form Type)

Evergy Missouri West, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant, sponsor and depositor as specified in its charter)

Evergy Missouri West Storm Funding I, LLC

(Exact name of registrant and issuing entity as specified in its charter)

Table 1: Newly Registered Securities

 

                 
    

Security

Type

 

Security

Class

Title

 

Fee

Calculation

or Carry

Forward

Rule

 

Amount

Registered

 

Proposed    

Maximum    

Offering    

Price Per    

Unit    

 

Maximum

Aggregate

Offering

Price (1)

 

Fee

Rate

 

Amount of

Registration

Fee (1)

                 
Fees to Be Paid   Asset-Backed Securities   Securitized Utility Tariff Bonds, Series 2023-A   457(o)   $1,000,000   100%     $1,000,000   0.00011020   $110.20
           
    Total Offering Amount     $1,000,000     $110.20
           
    Net Fee Due               $110.20

 

(1)

Estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the registration fee.