UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549
 
FORM ABS-15G
ASSET-BACKED SECURITIZER
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 15G OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
Check the appropriate box to indicate the filing obligation to which this form is intended to satisfy:
 
Rule 15Ga-1 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.15Ga-1) for the reporting period
 
 
 to



Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)
 
 
Commission File Number of securitizer:
 
   
Central Index Key Number of securitizer:
 

 
Name and telephone number, including area code, of the person to contact in connection with this filing.

Indicate by check mark whether the securitizer has no activity to report for the initial period  pursuant to Rule 15Ga-1(c)(1) ☐
 
Indicate by check mark whether the securitizer has no activity to report for the quarterly period pursuant to Rule 15Ga-1(c)(2)(i) ☐
 
Indicate by check mark whether the securitizer has no activity to report for the annual period pursuant to Rule 15Ga‑1(c)(2)(ii) ☐
 
Rule 15Ga-2 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.15Ga-2)
 
Central Index Key Number of depositor:
0001822808

DataBank Issuer, LLC
(Exact name of issuing entity as specified in its charter)

Central Index Key Number of issuing entity (if applicable):
0001822903
   
Central Index Key Number of underwriter (if applicable):
[Not applicable]

Kevin Ooley
214-720-2266
Name and telephone number, including area code, of the person to contact in connection with this filing



INFORMATION TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT

Item 2.01
Findings and Conclusions of a Third Party Due Diligence Report Obtained by the Issuer
 
Disclosures under Rule 15Ga-2 (17 CFR 240.15Ga-2) are attached as Exhibit 99.1 to this Form ABS-15G.
 
Exhibits
 
Exhibit Number
 
Description
     
 
Independent Accountants’ Report on Applying Agreed-Upon Procedures, dated January 5, 2026, of Deloitte & Touche LLP


SIGNATURES
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the reporting entity has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

 
DataBank Holdings Ltd.
   
  Date:    January 7, 2026
     
 
By:
/s/ Kevin Ooley
 
 
Name: Kevin Ooley
 
 
Title:   President and Chief Financial Officer
 



Exhibit 99.1

Deloitte & Touche LLP
3 Second Street
Suite 301
Harborside Plaza 10
Jersey City, NJ 07302
USA

Tel:  +1 212 937 8202
www.deloitte.com

DataBank, Ltd.
400 South Akard Street, Suite 100
Dallas, Texas 75202

Independent Accountants’ Report
on Applying Agreed-Upon Procedures
 
We have performed the procedures described below, related to certain information with respect to a portfolio of data center sites and the related tenant leases in connection with the proposed offering of DataBank Issuer, LLC and DataBank Co-Issuer, LLC Secured Data Center Revenue Term Notes, Series 2026-1. DataBank, Ltd. (the “Company”) is responsible for the information provided to us, including the information set forth in the Tenant Lease Data File and Data Center Site Data File (each as defined herein).
 
The Company has agreed to the procedures and acknowledged that the procedures performed are appropriate to meet the intended purpose of evaluating the accuracy of certain information set forth in the Tenant Lease Data File and Data Center Site Data File. Additionally, Guggenheim Securities, LLC (“Guggenheim” and together with the Company, the “Specified Parties”) has agreed to the procedures and acknowledged that the procedures performed are appropriate for their purposes.  This report may not be suitable for any other purpose.  The procedures performed may not address all of the items of interest to a user of the report and may not meet the needs of all users of the report and, as such, users are responsible for determining whether the procedures performed are appropriate for their purposes.  Consequently, we make no representations regarding the appropriateness of the procedures described below either for the purpose for which this report has been requested or for any other purpose.
 
Agreed-Upon Procedures

On November 25, 2025, representatives of Guggenheim, on behalf of the Company, provided us with a computer-generated data file and related record layout (the “Initial Tenant Lease Data File”) containing data, as represented to us by the Company, as of August 31, 2025, with respect to 11,997 tenant leases.  At the Company’s instruction, we randomly selected (i) two tenant leases from each of the 25 organizations (or one tenant lease for organizations with only one tenant lease) with the highest operational MRR (as set forth on the Initial Tenant Lease Data File) (the “Top 25 Organization’s Sample Tenant Leases”) (ii) 15 tenant leases that indicated a “Data Center” of “MSP3” (as set forth on the Initial Tenant Lease Data File) (the “15 MSP3 Tenant Leases”) and (iii) 60 tenant leases from the remaining 11,933 tenant leases (the “60 Random Sample Leases”). The Top 25 Organization’s Sample Tenant Leases and 15 MSP3 Sample Leases and 60 Random Tenant Leases are collectively and hereinafter referred to as the “Sample Leases.”

Additionally, on December 11, 2025, representatives of Guggenheim, on behalf of the Company, provided us with a supplemental data file (the “Supplemental Data File”) containing an updated contract end date for each of the Sample Leases.  At the Company’s instruction, we adjusted the Initial Tenant Lease Data File with the corresponding information set forth on the Supplemental Data File.  The Initial Tenant Lease Data File, as adjusted, is hereinafter referred to as the “Tenant Lease Data File.”

Further, on December 11, 2025, representatives of Guggenheim, on behalf of the Company, provided us with a computer-generated data file and related record layout (the “Data Center Site Data File”) containing data, as represented to us by the Company, as of August 31, 2025 with respect to the 36 data center sites related to the tenant leases included in the Tenant Lease Data File (the “Data Center Sites”).

File Review Procedures of the Data Center Sites:

For each of the Data Center Sites, we performed comparisons of the data center site characteristics (the “Data Center Site Characteristics”) set forth on the Data Center Site Data File and indicated below.

Data Center Site Characteristics
 
1.
Facility (for informational purposes only)
 
5.
KW load
 
2.
Current lease expiration date (if applicable)
 
6.
Square foot capacity
 
3.
Additional lease options (if applicable)
 
7.
Square foot occupied
 
4.
KW capacity
     

We compared Data Center Site Characteristics 2. and 3. to the lease agreement or any amendments thereto (collectively, the “Site Lease Agreement”).

We compared Data Center Site Characteristics 4. through 7. to schedules from the Company’s property management system as of August 31, 2025 (the “Property Schedules”).

The data center site documents indicated above and any other related documents provided in support of the Data Center Site Characteristics were provided to us by representatives of the Company and are collectively referred to hereinafter as the “Data Center Site Documentation.”

File Review Procedures of the Sample Leases:

For each of the Sample Leases, we performed comparisons of the tenant lease characteristics (the “Tenant Lease Characteristics”) set forth on the Tenant Lease Data File and indicated below.

Tenant Lease Characteristics
 
1.
Order number (for informational purposes only)
 
6.
Early termination fee %
 
2.
Organization name
 
7.
Renewal term
 
3.
Location
 
8.
Operational MRR
 
4.
Initial term (months)
 
9.
Contract start date
 
5.
Escalator %
 
10.
Contract end date

We compared Tenant Lease Characteristics 2. through 10. to the master lease agreement, service order, invoice or completion notice (collectively, the “Lease Agreement”).

For purposes of our procedures and at your instruction:


with respect to our comparison of Tenant Lease Characteristic 3., a location of  “DFW1” (as set forth on the Tenant Lease Data File) is deemed to be “in agreement” with a location of “DAL_TX” (as set forth on the Lease Agreement);


with respect to our comparison of Tenant Lease Characteristic 8., differences of 2.5% or less of the operational MRR indicated on the Tenant Lease Data File are deemed to be “in agreement;” and


with respect to our comparison of Tenant Lease Characteristics 9. and 10., differences of 30 days or less are deemed to be “in agreement.”


The tenant lease documents described above and any other related documents used in support of the Tenant Lease Characteristics were provided to us by representatives of the Company and are collectively referred to hereinafter as the “Tenant Lease Documentation.”

We were not requested to perform, and we did not perform, any procedures with respect to the preparation or verification of any of the information set forth on the Data Center Site Documentation or Tenant Lease Documentation and we make no representations concerning the accuracy or completeness of any of the information contained therein.  In certain instances, our procedures were performed using data imaged facsimiles or photocopies of the Data Center Site Documentation and Tenant Lease Documentation.  In addition, we make no representations as to whether the Data Center Site Documentation or Tenant Lease Documentation are comprehensive or valid instruments or reflect the current prevailing terms with respect to the corresponding Data Center Sites or Sample Leases, respectively.

Agreed-Upon Procedures’ Findings

The results of the foregoing procedures indicated that the Data Center Site Characteristics and Tenant Lease Characteristics set forth on the Data Center Site Data File or Tenant Lease Data File, as applicable, were found to be in agreement with the above-mentioned Data Center Site Documentation and Tenant Lease Documentation, except as indicated in Appendix A.  Supplemental information is contained in Appendix B.

******
 
We make no representations as to the (i) actual characteristics or existence of the underlying documents or data comprising the Data Center Sites or tenant leases underlying the Data Center Site Data File or Tenant Lease Data File or the conformity of their characteristics with those assumed for purposes of the procedures described herein, (ii) existence or ownership of the Data Center Sites or tenant leases or (iii) reasonableness of any of the aforementioned assumptions, information or methodologies.

It should be understood that we make no representations as to questions of legal interpretation or as to the sufficiency for your purposes of the procedures enumerated in the preceding paragraphs. Also, such procedures would not necessarily reveal any material misstatement of the information referred to above.  We have no responsibility to update this report for events and circumstances that occur subsequent to the date of this report.

We were engaged by the Company to perform this agreed-upon procedures engagement and conducted our engagement in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (“AICPA”). An agreed-upon procedures engagement involves the practitioner performing specific procedures that the engaging party has agreed to and acknowledged to be appropriate for the purpose of the engagement and reporting on findings based on the procedures performed. We were not engaged to conduct, and did not conduct, an (i) audit conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards or (ii) examination or a review engagement conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the AICPA, the objective of which would be the expression of an opinion or conclusion, respectively, on the Tenant Lease Data File or the Data Center Site Data File.  Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion or conclusion, or any other form of assurance, including reasonable assurance.  Had we performed additional procedures, other matters might have come to our attention that would have been reported to you.


We are required to be independent of the Company and to meet our other ethical responsibilities, as applicable for agreed-upon procedures engagements set forth in the Preface: Applicable to All Members and Part 1 – Members in Public Practice of the Code of Professional Conduct established by the AICPA.  Independence requirements for agreed-upon procedure engagements are less restrictive than independence requirements for audit and other attestation services.

None of the engagement, procedures or report was intended to address, nor did they address, the (i) conformity of the origination of the assets to stated underwriting or credit extension guidelines, standards, criteria or other requirements, (ii) value of collateral securing such assets or (iii) compliance of the originator of the assets with federal, state, and local laws and regulations.

None of the engagement, procedures or report were intended to satisfy, nor did they satisfy, any criteria for due diligence published by a nationally recognized statistical rating organization.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of the Specified Parties identified above and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these Specified Parties.

Yours truly,

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

January 5, 2026


Appendix A to Independent Accountants’ Report on Applying Agreed-Upon Procedures issued by Deloitte & Touche LLP dated January 5, 2026.

In applying our agreed-upon procedures as outlined above, we observed the following:

Exception
Description
Number

Exception Description – Tenant Lease Characteristics



1
 
Four differences in escalator %.
2
 
Two differences in early termination fee %.
3
 
Five differences in renewal term.
4
 
Fifteen differences in operational MRR.
5
 
Two differences in contract start date
6
 
Six differences in contract end date.

The information above reflects the procedures performed and is subject to the conditions set forth in the agreed-upon procedures report to which this appendix is attached.


Appendix B to Independent Accountants’ Report on Applying Agreed-Upon Procedures issued by Deloitte & Touche LLP dated January 5, 2026

Supplemental Information Related to the Findings Set Forth on Appendix A

Exception
Description
Number
Sample Lease
number
 
 
Tenant Lease Characteristic
Characteristic set
forth on the Tenant
Lease Data File
Characteristic set forth
on or derived from the
Lease Agreement
          
1
109341
Escalator %
2%
3%
1
124196
Escalator %
0%
2%
1
124660
Escalator %
0%
3%
1
28056
Escalator %
3.50%
0%
2
103379
Early termination fee %
75%
50%
2
76110
Early termination fee %
100%
50%
3
108547
Renewal term
1 month
12 months
3
119482
Renewal term
1 month
36 months
3
13403
Renewal term
1 month
N/A
3
72301
Renewal term
1 month
12 months
3
73891
Renewal term
36 months
12 months
4
104736
Operational MRR
$139,392.12
$143,573.88
4
109920
Operational MRR
$257.50
$250.00
4
124196
Operational MRR
$532,088.86
$655,501.10
4
12888
Operational MRR
$1,062.13
$1,126.81
4
14214
Operational MRR
$463.50
$506.48
4
37058
Operational MRR
$212.18
$225.10
4
43585
Operational MRR
$6,576.20
$6,919.69
4
4463
Operational MRR
$72,123.05
$76,132.86
4
5158
Operational MRR
$150.00
$190.02
4
65708
Operational MRR
$309.00
$327.82
4
7305
Operational MRR
$238.81
$260.95
4
73891
Operational MRR
$1,954.35
$2,073.37
4
7922
Operational MRR
$347.78
$368.96
4
8403
Operational MRR
$202.87
$242.24
4
O-33271
Operational MRR
$287.56
$296.25
5
124660
Contract start date
10/5/2022
8/7/2019
5
O-10202-1
Contract start date
4/7/2017
5/20/2013
6
122307
Contract end date
4/29/2027
6/16/2028
6
124660
Contract end date
10/4/2025
8/6/2023
6
13403
Contract end date
10/4/2025
12/4/2025
6
14061
Contract end date
12/31/2025
9/1/2026
6
43992
Contract end date
12/19/2025
3/20/2027
6
44437
Contract end date
2/14/2027
12/15/2025

The information above reflects the procedures performed and is subject to the conditions set forth in the agreed-upon procedures report to which this appendix is attached.