CA, INC. (Form Type: 8-K, Filing Date: 06/29/2006)

Item 2.02. Unaudited Results of Operations and Financial Condition.

On June 29, 2006, CA, Inc. (“CA” or the “Company”) issued a press release announcing its preliminary unaudited results for the fiscal quarter and fiscal year ended March 31, 2006. A copy of the press release is attached as Exhibit 99.1 hereto and is incorporated herein by reference.

As announced in the press release, the Company is furnishing business and preliminary unaudited financial information for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006, attached as Exhibit 99.2 and incorporated herein by reference. The Company announced that it is delaying the filing of its Annual Report on Form 10-K beyond its extended due date of June 29, 2006 as a result of two matters which have arisen during the completion of its annual audit.

Based upon a preliminary internal review of the Company’s prior policies and procedures with respect to the granting of stock options from fiscal year 1997 to the present related to its stock option plans in effect during this period, including a review of its underlying option grants, the Company believes that in fiscal years prior to fiscal year 2002, the Company did not communicate stock option grants to individual employees in a timely manner. In fiscal years 1997 through 2001, the Company experienced delays of up to approximately two years from the date that employee stock option grants were approved by the Compensation and Human Resource Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Committee”), to the date such stock options were communicated to individual employees. These delays could result in the need to recognize additional non-cash stock-based compensation expense over the vesting periods related to such grants. The Company has not yet completed its analysis of the amount to be recognized or any income tax effects, but estimates the pre-tax amounts relating to fiscal year 2005 and 2006 to be less than $20 million per year and the amounts relating to fiscal years 2002 through 2004 to be in the range of $40 million to $100 million per year on a pre-tax basis. The impact for periods prior to fiscal year 2002 relating to stock option grants beginning in fiscal year 1997 is expected to be in excess of $200 million on a pre-tax basis. The Company believes that this revision will not affect revenue or cash provided by operating activities. The Company has not undertaken a review of stock option grants prior to fiscal 1997. The Company’s internal review is ongoing and not complete as of the date of this Current Report on Form 8-K, and accordingly the information in Exhibit 99.2 is subject to change, which could be material, as the review proceeds.

In addition, based upon a continuing review of certain software license contract renewals in prior fiscal periods, the Company estimates that it has understated subscription revenue recorded in years prior to fiscal year 2006, in an aggregate amount of approximately $40 million. These adjustments will result in corresponding reductions to subscription revenue in future periods through approximately 2011. This continuing review of our software license contracts and the possible adjustments to our subscription revenue will represent a further adjustment to the amounts previously restated in October 2005.

As a result of these items, the Company believes it is likely (although it has not yet concluded) that it will need to restate its previously reported results for periods presented herein to include the impact of additional stock based compensation expense and to reflect additional subscription revenue as described above. The results presented below should therefore be considered preliminary and may be subject to additional adjustments which could be material.

Importantly, the Company believes that neither of these two accounting matters affects its existing contracts with customers and does not affect cash flow from operations or the reported amounts of assets and liabilities with the exception that income taxes payable may be affected with respect to the stock option matter.

The Company is obligated under the Deferred Prosecution Agreement it entered into with the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of New York and the Final Consent Judgment entered into with the Securities and Exchange Commission to comply with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including those related to the filing of periodic reports. In light of the internal control issues relating to sales commissions, income tax provisions, its internal control environment and other factors, the Company expects that the term of the Independent Examiner may be extended beyond September 30, 2006. The Company has not received any formal notification. While this Current Report is not a substitute for the required filing of our Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “Form 10-K”), which is due today, the Company is unable to file the Form 10-K until it has completed the pending review described above.

THE UNAUDITED FINANCIAL INFORMATION IN EXHIBITS 99.1 AND 99.2, INCLUDING INFORMATION ABOUT REVENUE, DEFERRED SUBSCRIPTION VALUE, TOTAL EXPENSES, NET INCOME, EARNINGS PER SHARE AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY, AS WELL AS COMPARISONS OF THESE AMOUNTS AND RELATED TRENDS BETWEEN PERIODS, ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE WHEN THE COMPANY HAS COMPLETED THE REVIEW DESCRIBED ABOVE. THESE CHANGES ARE LIKELY TO AFFECT THE UNAUDITED FINANCIAL INFORMATION INCLUDED IN EXHIBITS 99.1 AND 99.2 AND SOME OF THESE EFFECTS MAY BE MATERIAL. CONSEQUENTLY, SUBJECT TO COMPLETION OF THE REVIEW DESCRIBED ABOVE AND THE YEAR-END AUDIT PROCESS, THE COMPANY MAY CONCLUDE THAT ITS PREVIOUSLY FILED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND RELATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR THE PERIODS PRESENTED HEREIN, INCLUDING ANY SUCH INFORMATION INCLUDED IN EXHIBITS 99.1 AND 99.2, SHOULD NOT BE RELIED UPON. THE INFORMATION INCLUDED IN EXHIBITS 99.1 AND 99.2 DOES NOT REFLECT ANY OF THE DEVELOPMENTS RELATING TO THE OPTION GRANTS OR THE REVENUE RECOGNITION ISSUES RELATING TO CONTRACT RENEWALS.

BECAUSE OF THE PENDING REVIEW, THE COMPANY IS NOT IN A POSITION TO TIMELY FILE ITS FORM 10-K WITH THE SEC. NEVERTHELESS, THE COMPANY BELIEVES IT SHOULD PROVIDE INVESTORS WITH INFORMATION THAT IS CURRENTLY AVAILABLE AND HAS FURNISHED EXHIBIT 99.2 FOR THIS PURPOSE. WHILE EXHIBIT 99.2 INCLUDES INFORMATION OF THE KIND CALLED FOR BY FORM 10-K, EXHIBIT 99.2 DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THAT FORM OR RELATED SEC RULES BECAUSE IT OMITS CERTAIN REQUIRED INFORMATION AND THE INFORMATION IT DOES CONTAIN IS UNAUDITED AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS NOTED ABOVE. AMONG OTHER THINGS, THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT AUDITORS HAVE NOT EXPRESSED ANY OPINION OR ANY OTHER FORM OF ASSURANCE ON THE INFORMATION IN EXHIBIT 99.2, AND EXHIBIT 99.2 CONTAINS NO AUDIT REPORT ON THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR FISCAL YEARS 2006, 2005 AND 2004 OR AUDIT REPORT ON MANAGEMENT'S ASSESSMENT AND OPINION ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE COMPANY'S INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING. IN ADDITION, EXHIBIT 99.2 DOES NOT CONTAIN THE CERTIFICATIONS OF THE

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OR THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER REQUIRED TO BE INCLUDED BY THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 IN REPORTS ON FORM 10-K. MOREOVER, EXHIBIT 99.2 CONTAINS THE UNAUDITED FINANCIAL INFORMATION THAT IS LIKELY TO CHANGE AS REVIEW AND AUDIT PROCESS ARE COMPLETED. IN PARTICULAR, INFORMATION ABOUT REVENUE, TOTAL EXPENSES, EARNINGS PER SHARE AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY, AS WELL AS PERIOD-TO-PERIOD COMPARISONS OF THOSE AMOUNTS AND RELATED TRENDS, FOR ALL PERIODS ARE LIKELY TO BE AFFECTED BY THE REVIEW OF THE OPTIONS GRANTING PRACTICES AND THE CONTRACT RENEWALS, AND THE POTENTIAL RESTATEMENTS, DESCRIBED IN THIS CURRENT REPORT. EXHIBIT 99.2 IS NOT A SUBSTITUTE FOR THE DISCLOSURE REQUIRED IN THE FORM 10-K.

THE COMPANY WILL ATTEMPT TO FILE ITS FORM 10-K AS SOON AS IT HAS SUFFICIENT CERTAINTY AS TO THE IMPACT OF THESE MATTERS ON ITS FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. IN ADDITION, WHILE THE COMPANY BELIEVES THAT THE UNAUDITED FINANCIAL INFORMATION INCLUDED IN EXHIBIT 99.2 HAS BEEN PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES GENERALLY ACCEPTED IN THE UNITED STATES (GAAP) EXCEPT FOR THE UNCERTAINTIES FOR THE ABOVE NOTED ITEMS, THE COMPANY CAN GIVE NO ASSURANCES THAT ALL ADJUSTMENTS ARE FINAL AND THAT ALL ADJUSTMENTS NECESSARY TO PRESENT ITS FINANCIAL INFORMATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH GAAP HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED. THE COMPLETION OF THE COMPANY’S YEAR-END CLOSING PROCEDURES AND THE ANNUAL AUDIT COULD RESULT IN ADJUSTMENTS TO THE AMOUNTS REPORTED IN THE FINANCIAL INFORMATION IN EXHIBITS 99.1 AND 99.2. THEREFORE, ALL RESULTS REPORTED IN THESE EXHIBITS SHOULD BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY UNTIL THE COMPANY FILES ITS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE 2006 FISCAL YEAR

Stock Options

Given the stock option issues facing public companies, particularly in the technology sector, the Company commenced an internal review with an outside consultant into its historical stock option practices from fiscal year 1997 to the present under its stock option plans in effect during this period. Among other things, the Company is reviewing its underlying option grant documentation and procedures. The Company’s internal review has not been completed at this date.

Prior to fiscal year 2002, the Committee generally approved grants to executives and other employees receiving options, the terms of which were generally set on the date that the Committee acted, including the exercise price, vesting schedule and term. However, in a number of cases, these approvals involved pools of options that were not allocated to specific individuals at the time of such approvals. It also appears that communication of these grants to individual employees was not made until some time after the Committee acted, including in some cases up to two years after such Committee action. In almost all cases, this earlier date had an exercise price that was lower than the market price of the Company’s common stock on the date the award was formally communicated to employees. These grants were made primarily to non-executive employees and this grant practice was changed after fiscal year 2001. The current practice is that a grant is communicated promptly after it is approved by the Committee.

The Company treated the date of the action by the Committee as the accounting measurement date for determining stock-based compensation expense. However, the Company has determined that the proper accounting measurement date for stock option awards that were not communicated timely to an employee, even for periods before 2002, should have been the date the grant was communicated to an employee, not the date the Committee approved the grant.

The Company’s internal review is ongoing and therefore its preliminary estimate of stock-based compensation could change. Once the Company’s internal review is completed, it will conclude in what periods the stock-based compensation charges should be recorded. Based on the current estimate of the stock-based compensation charge, the Company believes that a restatement of prior period financial information may be required and the Company may conclude that it will report a material weakness in its financial controls relating to this matter. As stated above, the Company has not concluded its review of this matter and further adjustments may be necessary.

In conjunction with this review, the Company is also evaluating whether any previously deducted compensation related to exercised stock options may be non-deductible under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. In that event, the Company may be required to pay additional taxes and interest associated with previous compensation deductions in connection with such exercised stock options and it may lose additional deductions in future periods. The Company currently estimates that the amount of any lost tax deductions claimed on previously filed income tax returns will not be material to its consolidated results of operations or financial position, although the Company has not finalized its assessment of this matter.

Revenue Recognition

As discussed in its Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005, the Company recognizes revenue ratably on a monthly basis over the term of the subscription license agreement. When a contract is renewed prior to the expiration of the existing license term, the Company recognizes all future revenue for the arrangement ratably over the new license term. The Company has determined that for a relatively few contracts where there have been multiple early renewals of arrangements being recognized on a ratable basis, that it has been systematically understating revenue over the remaining terms of the earlier arrangements and overstating revenue over the renewal term. The Company corrected this treatment for renewals entered into in fiscal year 2006, and had believed that the impact on prior years was not significant. However, during its final revenue recognition review for fiscal year 2006, the Company began to quantify the impact associated with this accounting treatment for prior year renewals. The Company estimates that these prior year accounting errors resulted in the understatement of revenue for fiscal years 2005 and 2004 in the aggregate amount of approximately $40 million. These adjustments will result in corresponding reductions to subscription revenue in future periods through approximately 2011. The Company believes that the correction of this error will likely require a restatement and the Company may conclude that it will report a material weakness in its financial controls relating to this matter. As stated above, the Company has not concluded its review of this matter as of the date of this Current Report on Form 8-K and further adjustments may be necessary.

Item 5.04. Temporary Suspension of Trading Under Registrant’s Employee Benefit Plans.

As previously reported on its Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 13, 2006, the Company suspended its ability to sell shares of its common stock to its employees under its Savings Harvest Plan (the “Plan”), from 4:00 p.m. (ET) on Wednesday, June 14, 2006 through 5:30 p.m. (ET) on Thursday, June 29, 2006 (the “Suspension Period”). The Company is now extending the Suspension Period through 5:30 p.m. (ET) on Friday, July 28, 2006 (the “Extended Suspension Period”). During the Extended Suspension Period, directors and executive officers of the Company will not be permitted to purchase or sell any shares of Company stock (unless, as required by law, certain conditions are met). These restrictions are required by Section 306 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. On June 29, 2006, the Company gave notice of the Extended Suspension Period to its directors and executive officers, a copy of which is filed as Exhibit 99.2 hereto.

The Company previously imposed the Suspension Period because it deferred filing the Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006, which would otherwise have been due on June 14, 2006, for up to 15 calendar days to June 29, 2006, as permitted by Rule 12b-25 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Company is imposing the Extended Suspension Period because it will not file the Form 10-K by June 29, 2006. As a result, the Company will not use its existing registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933 to offer and sell Plan interests or the Company’s common stock to employees until it has filed the Form 10-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Item 7.01. Regulation FD Disclosure.

On June 29, 2006, the Company issued a press release announcing that the Board of Directors authorized a $2 billion common stock repurchase plan for fiscal year 2007. The repurchase plan will replace the program announced in March 2006 which called for regular repurchases in the open market of up to $600 million in common stock during the 2007 fiscal year. The new plan will not be implemented until the Company files the Form 10-K. A copy of the press release is attached as Exhibit 99.4 and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits.

(d) Exhibits


Exhibit No.		Description
Exhibit 99.1		Press release dated June 29, 2006, relating to CA’s financial results.
Exhibit 99.2		Business and preliminary unaudited financial information.
Exhibit 99.3		Notice to Directors and Executive Officers of CA, Inc.
Exhibit 99.4		Press release dated June 29, 2006, announcing common stock repurchase plan.

CA FILES FORM 8-K CONTAINING PRELIMINARY UNAUDITED
FISCAL YEAR 2006 FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Company Will Hold Webcast at 5 p.m. ET

ISLANDIA, N.Y., June 29, 2006 — CA (NYSE:CA), one of the world’s largest management software companies, today filed a Current Report on Form 8-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) containing business and preliminary unaudited financial information for the full fiscal year ended March 31, 2006.

The Company announced that it is delaying the filing of its Annual Report on Form 10-K beyond its extended due date of June 29, 2006, as a result of two matters which have arisen during the completion of its annual audit. Based upon a preliminary internal review of the Company’s prior policies and procedures with respect to the granting of stock options from fiscal year 1997 to present related to its stock option plans in effect during this period—including a review of its underlying options grants—the Company believes that in fiscal years prior to 2002, the Company did not communicate stock option grants to individual employees in a timely manner.

In fiscal years 1997 through 2001, the Company experienced delays of as much as two years from the date that employee stock options were approved by the Company’s Board of Directors to the date such stock option grants were communicated to individual employees. These delays could result in the need to recognize additional non-cash stock compensation expense over the vesting periods related to such grants. The Company has not yet completed its analysis of the amounts to be recognized or any income tax effect, but estimates the pre-tax amounts relating to fiscal years 2005 and 2006 to be less than $20 million per year, and the amounts relating to fiscal years 2002 through 2004 to be in the range of $40 million to $100 million per year on a pre-tax basis. The impact for periods prior to fiscal year 2002 relating to stock option grants beginning in fiscal 1997 is expected to be in excess of $200 million on a pre-tax basis. The Company has not undertaken a review of stock option grants prior to fiscal 1997.

In addition, based upon a continuing review of certain software license contract renewals in prior fiscal periods, the Company estimates that it has understated subscription revenue recorded in years preceding fiscal 2006, in an aggregate amount of approximately $40 million. These adjustments will result in corresponding reductions to subscription revenue in future periods through approximately 2011. This continuing review of software license contracts and the possible adjustments to subscription revenue represent a further adjustment to the amounts previously restated in October 2005.

As a result of these items, the Company believes it is likely—although it has not yet concluded—that it will need to restate its previously reported results to include the impact of additional stock based compensation expense to reflect additional subscription revenue as described above, and to report additional material weaknesses.

Importantly, neither of these two accounting matters affects CA’s existing contracts with customers and does not affect cash flow from operations.

The completion of the Company’s Form 10-K could result in adjustments to the amounts reported in this release. Therefore, all results reported in this release should be considered preliminary until CA files its Form 10-K for the 2006 fiscal year.

Preliminary Unaudited Financial Information


(in millions,
except share data)	Q4FY06			Q4FY05		Change			FY06		FY05			Change
Revenue	$	947		$	917		3	%	$	3,776	$	3,560			6	%
GAAP (LPS)/EPS from Continuing Operations		($0.06	)	$	0.03		n/m		$	0.23		($0.01	)		n/m
(Loss)/ Income from continuing operations		($36	)	$	16		n/m		$	136		($2	)		n/m
Non-GAAP Operating EPS*	$	0.14		$	0.20		(30	%)	$	0.81	$	0.80			1	%

*Operating earnings per share is a non-GAAP financial measure, as noted in the discussion of non-GAAP results below. A reconciliation of GAAP income from continuing operations to non-GAAP operating income is included in the tables following this press release.

“We are disappointed that we cannot file our 10-K to meet the extended deadline and that we continue to find problems associated with CA’s past. However, delaying the filing is our only option until we understand the full impact of the legacy stock option issue and any potential financial adjustments,” said John Swainson, CA president and chief executive officer. “These issues are about our past, and not our future, and we continue to focus on building the Company.

“In fiscal 2006, CA was affected by a number of operational issues that had a negative impact on our results. We’ve identified the problems and are taking actions to rectify them. We are and will continue to hold people accountable,” Swainson continued. “Our focus in fiscal 2007 is on superior execution and achieving industry best-of-breed benchmarks for every aspect of our operation. We made great progress in fiscal year 2006 in redefining our technology vision and customer value proposition and in aligning the Company to deliver on that vision. None of our competitors has all the tools to bring this vision to life. I am confident we are in the right market and have the right products and the right strategy to help our customers manage and secure their increasingly complex IT environments.”

Preliminary Unaudited Fourth Quarter and Full-Year Results

Revenue for the fourth quarter was $947 million, an increase of 3 percent over the prior period. For the full year, revenue was $3.776 billion, up 6 percent over fiscal year 2005. CA attributed a significant portion of the lower-than-anticipated total revenue in the fourth quarter to the speed of the accounting transition of revenue from recent acquisitions. In this change, revenue previously recognized in a perpetual model moved to CA’s ratable model, where revenue is recognized monthly over the life of the contract. This revenue has been deferred and will be recognized in future periods.

Subscription revenue for the fourth quarter was $713 million, an increase of 7 percent over the prior period. For the fiscal year, subscription revenue was $2.817 billion, an increase of 11 percent over the prior year.

Total product and services bookings in the fourth quarter were $1.192 billion, and for the full year, bookings were $3.381 billion. This represents a year-over-year decline of 29 percent for the fourth quarter and 19 percent for the full year. The fourth quarter and full-year decline in bookings was due primarily to the anticipated decrease in early renewal of license agreements resulting from the transition in fiscal year 2006 away from a total bookings-based compensation structure. In addition, CA signed contract extensions with two customers in the fourth quarter of 2005 that added approximately $400 million to bookings in that period. The Company said it expects bookings will be higher in fiscal 2007.

Total expenses for the fourth quarter were $997 million compared with $854 million in the prior year period. The increase was primarily due to higher selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses—including costs associated with recent acquisitions—higher restructuring costs and higher than anticipated commissions and royalty expenses, which were partially offset by reductions in variable compensation plans including management bonuses and other discretionary items.

For the full year, expenses were $3.663 billion compared with $3.558 billion in fiscal 2005. In addition to the above-mentioned expenses, the full year also was affected by higher costs associated with marketing initiatives as well as increases in Sarbanes-Oxley consulting costs and investments in the Company’s new ERP system.

The Company reported commissions, royalties and bonuses for the fiscal year of $387 million, which includes approximately $70 million more in sales commissions than it had anticipated at the outset of the fourth quarter.

In connection with the increase in commission expense, the Company said it intends to restate its financial statements for the third quarter and expects to report in its Form 10-K a material weakness, pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in its policies and procedures relating to the estimation, recording and monitoring of sales commissions and related accruals. CA determined approximately $31 million of additional commission expense should have been recognized in its third fiscal quarter. In its preliminary report, the Company said the restatement will have a negative impact of $0.03 on GAAP and non-GAAP earnings per share in the third quarter. The restatement will not have an impact on full-year earnings per share or cash flow from operations.

The Company recorded a GAAP loss from continuing operations of $36 million for the fourth quarter, or ($0.06) per diluted common share, compared to income of $16 million, or $0.03 per diluted common share, in the prior year period. In addition to the factors stated above, the fourth quarter results were adversely affected by the negative impact of $36 million of additional taxes associated with the repatriation of cash from foreign subsidiaries. The Company said it expects to report in its Form 10-K a material weakness in its policies and procedures relating to the identification, analysis, documentation and communication of non-routine tax matters. For the full year, GAAP income from continuing operations was $136

million, or $0.23 per diluted common share, compared to a loss of $2 million, or ($0.01) per diluted common share in fiscal year 2005.

The Company recorded non-GAAP income from continuing operations of $84 million for the fourth quarter, or $0.14 per diluted common share, compared to $129 million, or $0.20 per diluted common share a year earlier. For the full year, non-GAAP income from continuing operations was $490 million, or $0.81 per diluted common share, compared to $513 million, or $0.80 per diluted common share, reported in fiscal year 2005.

CA also has identified a third material weakness regarding its overall control environment over financial reporting due to a lack of effective communication policies and procedures. The Company said the ineffective control environment contributed to the material weaknesses stated above.

For the fourth quarter, CA reported $566 million in cash flow from operations, compared to $738 million reported in the prior year period. On a comparable basis, fourth quarter non-GAAP adjusted cash flow from operations was $648 million (adjusted for the third and final $75 million payment to the Restitution Fund and $7 million in restructuring payments), versus $552 million reported in the prior year (adjusted for a $191 million tax benefit and $5 million in restructuring payments).

For the full year, cash flow from operations was $1.380 billion, compared to $1.527 billion in the prior period. On a comparable basis, non-GAAP adjusted cash flow from operations for the full year (adjusted for $150 million in payments to the Restitution Fund and $22 million in restructuring payments) was $1.552 billion, compared to $1.327 billion (adjusted for a $300 million tax benefit, a $75 million payment to the Restitution Fund and $25 million in restructuring payments) reported in fiscal year 2005.

Full-year and fourth quarter growth in cash flow from operations was affected positively by a number of factors including a significant increase over the prior year in the number of customers who paid full contract value at the time of signing rather than over the life of the contract. Additionally, full-year results were benefited by lower tax payments and a decrease of receivable cycles and an increase of payable cycles. The Company anticipates cash flow generated from operations to decline in fiscal 2007 due to an expected $200 million increase in tax payments, higher disbursements associated with a reduction in its account payable balances, and a 401(k) contribution payment that in the past would have been made in March 2006, but is now being made in fiscal year 2007. These reductions in cash flow from operations will be partially offset by the fact that CA has completed its payments to the Restitution Fund.

Billings for the fourth quarter were $1.649 billion, an increase of 9 percent over the prior year period. Billings for the full fiscal year were $4.585 billion, an increase of 5 percent over the similar period last year. Billings growth was primarily attributed to the sale of acquisition-related products and accelerated customer payments. Excluding these items, billings would have been slightly down for the year.

Capital Structure

The balance of cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities at March 31, 2006, was $1.865 billion. With $1.811 billion in total debt outstanding, the Company has a net cash position of approximately $54 million.

During the quarter, the Company repurchased approximately 8 million shares of its common stock at an aggregate cost of approximately $223 million. Over the course of fiscal year 2006, CA repurchased approximately 21 million shares of its stock at an aggregate cost of approximately $590 million.

CA also announced today that its Board of Directors has authorized a new stock repurchase plan that enables the Company to buy $2 billion of its common stock during the current fiscal year. The plan will not be implemented until after the Company has filed its Form 10-K. CA currently is exploring various options to best execute the stock repurchases and expects it will be financed through a combination of cash on hand and bank financing (see separate news release).

Deferred Prosecution Agreement

CA indicated that it is obligated under the Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA) and the related SEC Consent Judgment to comply with SEC rules including those related to the filing of periodic reports. As noted above, CA will not file its Form 10-K by the deadline of June 29, 2006.

The Company also indicated that in light of the internal control issues relating to sales commissions, income tax provisions, its internal control environment and other factors, it expects that the term of the Independent Examiner may be extended beyond September 30, 2006. The Company added that it has not received any formal notification.

“Successfully meeting the terms of the DPA is a mandated priority,” Swainson said. “We fully support and will work diligently with the Independent Examiner to address all the outstanding requirements of the DPA.”

Outlook for Fiscal Year 2007

The following annual outlook is based on current expectations and represents “forward-looking statements” (as defined below).


					%
			FY06		Increase(Decreases)
(in millions, except share data)	FY07		unaudited		over FY06
Revenue	$	3,900	$	3,776		3	%
GAAP EPS from Continuing Operations	$	0.44	$	0.23		91	%
GAAP Cash Flow from Operations	$	1,300	$	1,380		(6	%)
Non-GAAP Operating EPS*	$	0.83	$	0.81		2	%

The Company added that its annual outlook for 2007 has not been adjusted to reflect the $2 billion repurchase plan. This outlook also assumes that the Company will take steps to achieve certain cost savings. These steps may have related non-operating costs that would have a negative effect on GAAP earnings per share. The

Company has not yet identified these savings or quantified their potential impact on GAAP earnings per share, and it is possible that GAAP earnings per share could be lower than the amount included in this outlook.

The Company said going forward, it will no longer provide quarterly guidance. However, because of the proximity to the close of the first quarter of fiscal year 2007 on June 30, 2006, CA indicated that first quarter revenue and non-GAAP operating earnings per share will be down sequentially. As noted above, the timing shift of 401(k) contribution payments, the increased commission payments and the decrease in days payable will adversely affect cash flow from operations in the first quarter. The Company expects performance to improve over the course of the year to achieve the fiscal year 2007 targets.

“CA is in a period of continuing operational transformation as we execute and build upon the changes we implemented during fiscal year 2006,” said Michael Christenson, CA’s chief operating officer. “We are working to ensure we are as efficient as possible and effectively managing our cost structure. At the same time, we are realigning our worldwide sales organization to provide more value to customers, expanding our development capabilities abroad, implementing our ERP system to drive greater efficiencies and productivity, and concentrating on growing the products we have acquired to achieve a return on those investments.”

Webcast

This press release and the accompanying tables should be read in conjunction with additional content that is available on the Company’s website, including a supplemental financial package and related slide presentation, as well as a webcast that the Company will host at 5 p.m. ET today to discuss its unaudited fourth quarter and full-year 2006 results. The webcast will be archived on the website. Individuals can access the webcast, as well as this press release and supplemental financial information, at http://ca.com/invest or listen to the call at (800) 729-6829. The international participant number is (706) 679-5227.

About CA

CA (NYSE:CA), one of the world’s largest information technology (IT) management software companies, unifies and simplifies the management of enterprise-wide IT. Founded in 1976, CA is headquartered in Islandia, N.Y., and serves customers in more than 140 countries. For more information, please visit http://ca.com.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

This press release includes financial measures for per share earnings and cash flows that exclude the impact of certain items and therefore have not been calculated in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). Non-GAAP “operating” earnings per share excludes the following items: non-cash amortization of acquired technology and other intangibles, in process research and development charges, the government investigation and class settlement charges, restructuring and other charges, and the tax resulting from the repatriation of approximately $584 million of foreign cash and interest on dilutive convertible bonds (the convertible shares, rather than the interest, are more dilutive, thus the interest is added back and the shares increased to calculate non-GAAP operating earnings).

Non-GAAP taxes are provided based on the estimated effective annual non-GAAP tax rate. Non-GAAP adjusted cash flow excludes the following items: Restitution Fund payments, restructuring payments, and the impact of certain non-recurring tax payments or tax benefits. These non-GAAP financial measures may be different from non-GAAP financial measures used by other companies. Non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered as a substitute for, or superior to, measures of financial performance prepared in accordance with GAAP. By excluding these items, non-GAAP financial measures facilitate management’s internal comparisons to the Company’s historical operating results and cash flows, to competitors’ operating results and cash flows, and to estimates made by securities analysts. Management uses these non-GAAP financial measures internally to evaluate its performance and they are key variables in determining management incentive compensation. The Company believes these non-GAAP financial measures are useful to investors in allowing for greater transparency of supplemental information used by management in its financial and operational decision-making. In addition, the Company has historically reported similar non-GAAP financial measures to its investors and believes that the inclusion of comparative numbers provides consistency in its financial reporting. Investors are encouraged to review the reconciliation of the non-GAAP financial measures used in this press release to their most directly comparable GAAP financial measures, which are attached to this press release.

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements in this communication (such as statements containing the words “believes,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “expects,” “estimates” and similar expressions) constitute “forward-looking statements.” A number of important factors could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those indicated by such forward-looking statements, including: the risks and uncertainties associated with the CA deferred prosecution agreement with the United States Attorney’s Office of the Eastern District, including that CA could be subject to criminal prosecution or civil penalties if it violates this agreement; the risks and uncertainties associated with the agreement that CA entered into with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), including that CA may be subject to criminal prosecution or substantial civil penalties and fines if it violates this agreement; civil litigation arising out of the matters that are the subject of the Department of Justice and the SEC investigations, including shareholder derivative litigation; changes to the compensation plan of CA’s sales organization may lead to outcomes that are not anticipated or intended as they are implemented, and the commissions plans for fiscal year 2007, while revised, continue to be reviewed; CA may not adequately manage and evolve its financial reporting and managerial systems and processes, including the successful implementation of its enterprise resource planning software; CA may encounter difficulty in successfully integrating acquired companies and products into its existing businesses; CA is subject to intense competition in product and service offerings and pricing and increased competition is expected in the future; if CA’s products do not remain compatible with ever-changing operating environments, CA could lose customers and the demand for CA’s products and services could decrease; certain software that CA uses in daily operations is licensed from third parties and thus may not be available to CA in the future, which has the potential to delay product development and production; CA’s credit ratings have been downgraded and could be downgraded further which would require CA to pay additional interest under its credit agreement and could adversely

Table 1
CA, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(in millions, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)


	Three Months Ended						Fiscal Year Ended
	March 31,						March 31,
	2006			2005			2006			2005
Revenue:
Subscription revenue	$	713		$	669		$	2,817		$	2,544
Maintenance		102			109			430			441
Software fees and other		34			58			163			254
Financing fees		7			15			45			77
Professional services		91			66			321			244

Total revenue		947			917			3,776			3,560

Operating Expenses:
Amortization of capitalized software costs		114			112			449			447
Cost of professional services		78			62			272			229
Selling, general and administrative		418			341			1,593			1,346
Product development and enhancements		175			180			696			704
Commissions, royalties and bonuses		139			113			387			339
Depreciation and amortization of other intangible assets		39			33			134			130
Other expenses (gains), net ⁽¹⁾		2			(14	)		(15	)		(5	)
Restructuring and other		22			—			88			28
Charge for in-process research and development costs		—			—			18			—
Shareholder litigation and government investigation settlements		—			—			—			234

Total expenses before interest and taxes		987			827			3,622			3,452

(Loss) income from continuing operations before interest and taxes		(40	)		90			154			108
Interest expense, net		10			27			41			106

(Loss) income from continuing operations before taxes		(50	)		63			113			2
Tax (benefit) expense ⁽²⁾		(14	)		47			(23	)		4

(Loss) income from continuing operations		(36	)		16			136			(2	)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes		—			—			3			(2	)


Net (loss) income	$	(36	)	$	16		$	139		$	(4	)

Basic (Loss) Income Per Share:
(Loss) income from continuing operations	$	(0.06	)	$	0.03		$	0.23		$	(0.01	)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations		—			—			0.01			—

Net (loss) income	$	(0.06	)	$	0.03		$	0.24		$	(0.01	)

Basic weighted-average shares used in computation		575			589			581			588

Diluted (Loss) Income Per Share:
(Loss) income from continuing operations ⁽³⁾	$	(0.06	)	$	0.03		$	0.23		$	(0.01	)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations		—			—			0.01			—

Net (loss) income⁽³⁾	$	(0.06	)	$	0.03		$	0.24		$	(0.01	)

Diluted weighted-average shares used in computation⁽³⁾		575			591			608			588



(1)		Fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 includes an approximate $7 million pre-tax gain on the divestiture of Ingres.

(2)		The fourth quarter of fiscal 2006 includes a tax charge of approximately $36 million associated with the repatriation of international cash which was partly offset by the foreign tax credits. The tax benefit for fiscal year 2006 includes approximately $51 million from the recognition of certain foreign tax credits, $18 million arising from international stock based compensation deductions and $66 million arising from foreign export benefits and other international tax rate benefits. Partially offsetting these benefits was a charge of approximately $60 million related to additional tax contingencies. The fourth quarter of fiscal 2005 and fiscal year 2005 include a tax charge of $55 million associated with the repatriation of international cash which was partially offset by a foreign export benefit refund received in the second quarter of approximately $26 million associated with prior fiscal years.

(3)		Net income and the number of shares used in the computation of diluted GAAP EPS for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 have been adjusted to reflect the dilutive impact of the Company’s 1.625 percent Convertible Senior Notes.

Table 3
CA, INC.
Quarterly Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
(in millions)
(unaudited)


	Three Months Ended						Fiscal Year Ended
	March 31,						March 31,
	2006			2005 ⁽¹⁾			2006			2005⁽¹⁾
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net (loss) income	$	(36	)	$	16		$	139		$	(4	)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes		—			—			3			(2	)

(Loss) income from continuing operations		(36	)		16			136			(2	)

Adjustments to reconcile (loss) income from continuing operations to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		153			145			583			577
Provision for deferred income taxes		(82	)		19			(344	)		(196	)
Non-cash compensation expense related to stock and pension plans		3			27			96			104
Loss (Gain) on asset divestitures		1			—			(7	)		—
Shareholder litigation settlement		—						—			16
Foreign currency transaction loss (gain)		1			2			(9	)		8
Non-cash charge for in-process research and development		—			—			18			—
Changes in other operating assets and liabilities:
Decrease in noncurrent installment A/R, net		43			89			164			210
Increase (decrease) in deferred subscription revenue (collected) — noncurrent		174			44			179			(8	)
Increase (decrease) in deferred maintenance revenue		7			34			(20	)		(27	)
Decrease in trade and current installment A/R, net		38			80			270			379
Increase in deferred subscription revenue (collected) — current		264			223			149			164
Increase in taxes payable, net		21			57			91			165
Restitution fund, net		(75	)		—			(150	)		143
Restructuring and other, net		15			(5	)		56			3
(Decrease) Increase in A/P, accrued expense and other		(40	)		(115	)		101			(141	)
Changes in other operating assets and liabilities		79			122			67			132

NET CASH PROVIDED BY CONTINUING OPERATING ACTIVITIES		566			738			1,380			1,527

INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Acquisitions, primarily goodwill, purchased software, and other intangible assets, net of cash acquired		(331	)		(11	)		(1,011	)		(469	)
Settlements of purchase accounting liabilities		(7	)		(5	)		(37	)		(21	)
Purchases of property and equipment, net		(32	)		(27	)		(143	)		(69	)
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment		36			—			77			14
Sales (purchases) of marketable securities, net		43			101			344			(116	)
Increase (decrease) in restricted cash		10			(7	)		7			(9	)
Capitalized software development costs and other		(19	)		(23	)		(84	)		(70	)

NET CASH (USED IN) PROVIDED BY INVESTING ACTIVITIES		(300	)		28			(847	)		(740	)

FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Debt (repayments) borrowings, net		(1	)		(1	)		(912	)		996
Dividends paid		(23	)		(24	)		(93	)		(47	)
Debt issuance fees		—			—			—			(12	)
Exercise of common stock options and other		22			18			127			99
Exercise of call spread options		—			(673	)		—			(673	)
Purchases of treasury stock		(223	)		(150	)		(590	)		(161	)

NET CASH (USED IN) PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES		(225	)		(830	)		(1,468	)		202

INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS BEFORE EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH		41			(64	)		(935	)		989
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash		28			(32	)		(63	)		47

INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		69			(96	)		(998	)		1,036
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD		1,762			2,925			2,829			1,793

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD	$	1,831		$	2,829		$	1,831		$	2,829


(1)		Certain balances have been reclassified to conform with current period presentation.

Table 4
CA, INC.
Reconciliation of GAAP Results to Net Operating Income
(in millions, except per share data)
(unaudited)


	Three Months Ended					Fiscal Year Ended
	March 31,					March 31,
	2006			2005		2006		2005
Total Revenue	$	947		$	917	$	3,776	$	3,560
Total Expenses		997			854		3,663		3,558

(Loss) income before income taxes		(50	)		63		113		2

Non-GAAP adjustments:

Purchased software amortization		101			101		401		406
Intangibles amortization		14			10		51		40
Acquisition IPR&D		—			—		18		—
Restructuring and other⁽¹⁾		22			—		88		28
Restitution fund charge		—			—		—		218
Shareholder Litigation		—			—		—		16

Total Non-GAAP adjustments		137			111		558		708

Operating income before interest and taxes		87			174		671		710

Interest on dilutive convertible Bonds		2			10		8		41

Operating income before taxes		89			184		679		751
Income tax provision⁽²⁾		5			55		189		238

Net operating income⁽³⁾	$	84		$	129	$	490	$	513

Diluted operating EPS⁽³⁾	$	0.14		$	0.20	$	0.81	$	0.80

# of Shares Used⁽³⁾		602			637		608		640


(1)		The fourth quarter of fiscal 2006 and fiscal year 2006 include restructuring charges of $18 million and $72 million, respectively and other charges of $4 million and $16 million, respectively. Fiscal year 2005 includes restructuring charges of $28 million.

(2)		Non-GAAP taxes are provided based on the estimated effective annual non-GAAP tax rate. The fourth quarter of fiscal 2006 included approximately $25 million of foreign tax credits.

(3)		Net operating income and the number of shares used in the computation of diluted operating EPS for the three months and fiscal years ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 have been adjusted to reflect the dilutive impact of the Company’s 1.625 percent Convertible Senior Notes. The number of shares for the three months and fiscal year ended March 31, 2005 also includes the dilutive impact of the Company’s 5 percent Convertible Senior Notes.

Refer to the discussion of Non-GAAP measures included in the accompanying press release for additional information.

EXPLANATORY NOTE

The Company is furnishing business and preliminary unaudited financial information for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006. The Company announced that it is delaying the filing of its Annual Report on Form 10-K beyond its extended due date of June 29, 2006 as a result of two matters which have arisen during the completion of its annual audit.

Based upon a preliminary internal review of the Company’s prior policies and procedures with respect to the granting of stock options from fiscal year 1997 to the present related to its stock option plans in effect during this period, including a review of its underlying option grants, the Company believes that in fiscal years prior to fiscal year 2002, the Company did not communicate stock option grants to individual employees in a timely manner. In fiscal years 1997 through 2001, the Company experienced delays of up to approximately two years from the date that employee stock options were approved by the Compensation and Human Resource Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Committee”), to the date such stock option grants were communicated to individual employees. These delays could result in the need to recognize additional non-cash stock-based compensation expense over the vesting periods related to such grants. The Company has not yet completed its analysis of the amount to be recognized or any income tax effects, but estimates the pre-tax amounts relating to fiscal year 2005 and 2006 to be less than $20 million per year and the amounts relating to fiscal years 2002 through 2004 to be in the range of $40 million to $100 million per year on a pre-tax basis. The impact for periods prior to fiscal year 2002 relating to stock option grants beginning in fiscal year 1997 is expected to be in excess of $200 million on a pre-tax basis. The Company believes that this revision will not affect revenue or cash provided by operating activities. The Company has not undertaken a review of stock option grants prior to fiscal 1997. The Company’s internal review is ongoing and not complete as of the date hereof, and accordingly the information set forth below is subject to change, which could be material, as the review proceeds.

Importantly, the Company believes that neither of these two accounting matters affects its existing contracts with customers and does not affect cash flow from operations.

The Company is also obligated under the Deferred Prosecution Agreement it entered into with the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of New York and the Final Consent Judgment entered into with the Securities and Exchange Commission to comply with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including those related to the filing of periodic reports. In light of the internal control issues relating to sales commissions, income tax provisions, its internal control environment and other factors, the Company expects that the term of the Independent Examiner may be extended beyond September 30, 2006. The Company has not received any formal notification. While this Current Report is not a substitute for the required filing of our Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “Form 10-K”), which is due today, the Company is unable to file the Form 10-K until it has completed the pending review described above.

THE UNAUDITED FINANCIAL INFORMATION SET FORTH BELOW, INCLUDING INFORMATION ABOUT REVENUE, DEFERRED SUBSCRIPTION VALUE, TOTAL EXPENSES, NET INCOME, EARNINGS PER SHARE AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY, AS WELL AS COMPARISONS OF THESE AMOUNTS AND RELATED TRENDS BETWEEN PERIODS, ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE WHEN THE COMPANY HAS COMPLETED THE REVIEW DESCRIBED ABOVE. THESE CHANGES ARE LIKELY TO AFFECT THE

UNAUDITED FINANCIAL INFORMATION SET FORTH BELOW AND SOME OF THESE EFFECTS MAY BE MATERIAL. CONSEQUENTLY, SUBJECT TO COMPLETION OF THE REVIEW DESCRIBED ABOVE AND THE YEAR-END AUDIT PROCESS, THE COMPANY MAY CONCLUDE THAT ITS PREVIOUSLY FILED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND RELATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR THE PERIODS PRESENTED HEREIN, INCLUDING ANY SUCH INFORMATION SET FORTH BELOW, SHOULD NOT BE RELIED UPON. THE INFORMATION SET FORTH BELOW DOES NOT REFLECT ANY OF THE DEVELOPMENTS RELATING TO THE OPTION GRANTS OR THE REVENUE RECOGNITION ISSUES RELATED TO CONTRACT RENEWALS.

BECAUSE OF THE PENDING REVIEW, THE COMPANY IS NOT IN A POSITION TO TIMELY FILE THE FORM 10-K WITH THE SEC. NEVERTHELESS, THE COMPANY BELIEVES IT SHOULD PROVIDE INVESTORS WITH INFORMATION THAT IS CURRENTLY AVAILABLE AND HAS FURNISHED THE INFORMATION BELOW FOR THIS PURPOSE. WHILE THIS EXHIBIT INCLUDES INFORMATION OF THE KIND CALLED FOR BY FORM 10-K, THIS EXHIBIT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THAT FORM OR RELATED SEC RULES BECAUSE IT OMITS CERTAIN REQUIRED INFORMATION AND THE INFORMATION IT DOES CONTAIN IS UNAUDITED AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS NOTED ABOVE. AMONG OTHER THINGS, THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT AUDITORS HAVE NOT EXPRESSED ANY OPINION OR ANY OTHER FORM OF ASSURANCE ON THE INFORMATION SET FORTH BELOW CONTAINS NO AUDIT REPORT ON THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR FISCAL YEARS 2006, 2005 AND 2004 OR AUDIT REPORT ON MANAGEMENT’S ASSESSMENT AND OPINION ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE COMPANY’S INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING. IN ADDITION, THIS EXHIBIT DOES NOT CONTAIN THE CERTIFICATIONS OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OR THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER REQUIRED TO BE INCLUDED BY THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 IN REPORTS ON FORM 10-K. MOREOVER, THIS EXHIBIT CONTAINS THE UNAUDITED FINANCIAL INFORMATION THAT IS LIKELY TO CHANGE AS REVIEW AND AUDIT PROCESS ARE COMPLETED. IN PARTICULAR, INFORMATION ABOUT REVENUE, TOTAL EXPENSES, EARNINGS PER SHARE AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY, AS WELL AS PERIOD-TO-PERIOD COMPARISONS OF THOSE AMOUNTS AND RELATED TRENDS, FOR ALL PERIODS ARE LIKELY TO BE AFFECTED BY THE REVIEW OF THE OPTIONS GRANTING PRACTICES AND THE CONTRACT RENEWALS, AND THE POTENTIAL RESTATEMENTS, DESCRIBED IN THIS CURRENT REPORT. THIS EXHIBIT IS NOT A SUBSTITUTE FOR THE DISCLOSURE REQUIRED IN THE FORM 10-K.

THE COMPANY WILL ATTEMPT TO FILE ITS FORM 10-K AS SOON AS IT HAS SUFFICIENT CERTAINTY AS TO THE IMPACT OF THESE MATTERS ON ITS FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. IN ADDITION, WHILE THE COMPANY BELIEVES THAT THE UNAUDITED FINANCIAL INFORMATION INCLUDED IN THIS EXHIBIT HAS BEEN PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES GENERALLY ACCEPTED IN THE UNITED STATES (GAAP) EXCEPT FOR THE UNCERTAINTIES FOR THE ABOVE NOTED ITEMS, THE COMPANY CAN GIVE NO ASSURANCES THAT ALL ADJUSTMENTS ARE FINAL AND THAT ALL ADJUSTMENTS NECESSARY TO PRESENT ITS FINANCIAL INFORMATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH GAAP HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED. THE COMPLETION OF THE COMPANY’S YEAR-END CLOSING PROCEDURES AND THE ANNUAL AUDIT COULD RESULT IN ADJUSTMENTS TO THE AMOUNTS REPORTED IN THE FINANCIAL INFORMATION SET FORTH BELOW. THEREFORE, ALL RESULTS REPORTED IN THESE EXHIBITS SHOULD BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY UNTIL THE COMPANY FILES ITS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE 2006 FISCAL YEAR.

Stock Options

Revenue Recognition

This report (“Exhibit”) contains certain forward-looking information relating to CA, Inc. (the “Company,” “Registrant,” “CA,” “we,” “our,” or “us”), formerly known as Computer Associates International Inc., that is based on the beliefs of, and assumptions made by, our management as well as information currently available to management. When used in this Exhibit, the words “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking information. Such information includes, for example, the

statements made under the caption “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” under Item 7, but also appears in other parts of this Exhibit. This forward-looking information reflects our current views with respect to future events and is subject to certain risks, uncertainties, and assumptions, some of which are described under the caption “Risk Factors” in Part 1 Item 1A and elsewhere in this Exhibit. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties occur, or should our assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those described in this Exhibit as anticipated, believed, estimated, or expected. We do not intend to update these forward-looking statements.

The products and services mentioned in this Exhibit are used for identification purposes only and may be protected by trademarks, trade names, services marks and/or other intellectual property rights of the Company and/or other parties in the United States and/or other jurisdictions. The absence of a specific attribution in connection with any such mark does not constitute a waiver of any such right.

This Exhibit also contains references to other company, brand, and product names. These company, brand, and product names are used herein for identification purposes only and may be the trademarks of their respective owners. We disclaim any responsibility for specifying which marks are owned by which companies or which organizations.

Restatement of Third Quarter Fiscal Year 2006 Results:

As previously announced in the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on May 30, 2006, in this Exhibit we are furnishing restated financial results for the third quarter of fiscal year 2006 to reflect approximately $31 million of additional commission expense that should have been recorded in that period. The restatement reduces previously reported earnings per share for the third quarter of fiscal year 2006 by approximately $0.03 per share. This restatement does not affect previously reported third quarter total revenue and cash flow from operations or financial results for the full fiscal year.

We have included under Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Selected Quarterly Information,” the restated unaudited quarterly financial information for the quarter ended December 31, 2005.

The Company reported a material weakness in its financial controls as they relate to the estimation, recording and monitoring of sales commissions. Refer to Part 1, Item 9A, “Controls and Procedures”, for additional information concerning the evaluation of the Company’s internal control processes.

PART I


Item 1.	Business.


(a)	General Development of Business

Overview

CA, Inc. is one of the world’s largest independent providers of information technology (IT) management software. We develop, market, deliver and license software products and services that allow organizations to run, manage and automate aspects of their computing environments, or IT infrastructures, which are critical to their business.

The Company was incorporated in Delaware in 1974, began operations in 1976, and completed an initial public offering of common stock in December 1981. Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “CA”.

We are considered an Independent Software Vendor (ISV). ISVs develop and license software products that can increase the efficiency of computer hardware platforms or operating systems sold by other vendors.

Our software helps our customers dynamically manage all of the people, processes, computers, networks and the range of technologies that make up their IT infrastructure. We have a broad portfolio of software products and services that span the areas of infrastructure management, security management, storage management and business service optimization. Our solutions work across all networks and systems, across distributed and mainframe environments, and across all major hardware and software platforms in use by our customers.

Because many organizations have increased their investments in technology over the years, their IT infrastructures are complex and security has become an increasing concern. Customers therefore place high value on software and services that can help them manage their entire IT infrastructures better and more securely.

Business Developments and Highlights

In fiscal year 2006, we took the following actions to support our business:


	•	We aligned our product development by software business units. The business unit structure is designed to increase our accountability to customer needs and to be more responsive to the changing dynamics of the management software marketplace. Please refer to Item 1, “Business — (c) Narrative Description of the Business — Business Unit Structure” below for more information.

	•	We completed several acquisitions throughout fiscal year 2006, including but not limited to the following:


	•	In March 2006, we completed the acquisition of Wily Technology, Inc. (Wily), a provider of enterprise application management solutions, for a total purchase price of approximately $374 million. Wily is now part of our Enterprise Systems Management business unit.

	•	In October 2005, we completed the acquisition of iLumin Software Services, Inc. (iLumin), a privately held provider of enterprise message management and archiving software, for a total purchase price of approximately $48 million. iLumin’s Assentor product line has been added to our Storage Management business unit.

	•	In July 2005, we completed the acquisition of Niku Corporation (Niku), a provider of IT management and governance solutions, for a total purchase price of approximately $345 million. Niku is now part of our Business Service Optimization business unit.

	•	In June 2005, we completed the acquisition of Concord Communications, Inc. (Concord), a provider of network service management software solutions, for a total purchase price of approximately $359 million. Concord’s solutions are now part of our Enterprise Systems Management business unit.


	•	In November 2005, we held CA World where we unveiled our Enterprise IT Management, or EITM strategy and announced 26 EITM-enabled products, including the release of Unicenter r11. This was CA’s first Unicenter upgrade in 4 years and one of CA’s biggest product launches ever.

	•	In July 2005, we announced a restructuring plan to more closely align our investments with strategic growth opportunities. We recorded charges of approximately $66 million in fiscal year 2006 for severance and other termination benefits and facility closures in connection with our restructuring plan, which included a workforce reduction of approximately five percent or 800 positions worldwide. The plan is expected to yield about $75 million in savings on an annualized basis, once the reductions are fully implemented. We anticipate the total restructuring plan will cost up to $85 million.

	•	We have increased our operations in India, primarily in product support and development. This has increased the efficiency of our support and development activities.

	•	During fiscal year 2006, we repurchased approximately $590 million in Company stock.

We began the implementation of a new enterprise resource planning system which we expect will improve the efficiency of the Company’s operations and enable us to take advantage of business intelligence tools to generate the data needed to analyze our business in real-time. We have spent approximately $129 million on this project through fiscal year 2006 and expect to spend approximately $100 million in fiscal year 2007. Phase one of the implementation was completed in the first quarter of fiscal year 2007, which covered North America and Worldwide Human Resources.


(b)	Financial Information About Segments

Our global business is principally in a single industry segment — the design, development, marketing, licensing, and support of software products that can operate on a wide range of hardware platforms and operating systems. Refer to Note 4, “Segment and Geographic Information”, in the Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements for financial data pertaining to our segment and geographic operations.


(c)	Narrative Description of the Business

We are one of the world’s largest providers of IT management software. We have a clear vision of how organizations can better manage all of their hardware, software, databases and applications to realize the full power of technology. We help customers close the gap between the promise of IT and what it actually delivers.

Our EITM strategy for managing IT helps customers unify and simplify the management of heterogeneous business processes, IT services, applications, users and assets in a secure and automated way across the enterprise. As a result, customers can reduce cost, reduce risk, improve service and better align their IT to the needs of their organization.

Growth Strategy

To build our business, we are pursuing a four-part growth strategy:

1. Internal Product Development


	•	We have 5,800 engineers globally, designing and supporting software to extend our functionality and capabilities in the network and systems management, security and storage areas, and have charged approximately $0.7 billion to operations in each of the fiscal years ended March 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004.

	•	Development activities are tied directly to customer needs and our five business units. Please refer to “— Business Unit Structure” below for more information.

2. Strengthening Channel Partner Relationships


	•	Channel partners are critical to our success. We need a broad base of channel partners to reach a wider range of customers. By developing strong relationships with systems integrators, distribution channel partners, value-added resellers (VARs) and original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), we extend CA technology to customers who otherwise wouldn’t have access to it.

	•	Distribution and OEM channel partners, referred to as “indirect” or “channel” partners, make up approximately 11% of our new deferred subscription value — a figure we believe we can grow.

	•	We characterize our channel partners in two ways:


	•	Value — These channel partners sell CA solutions that require a high level of expertise to sell. In fiscal year 2006, we launched the Enterprise Solution Provider Program to recruit, train and educate VARs on CA products and solutions. Through this program, we have authorized approximately 800 channel partners worldwide to sell CA solutions and are now extending the program to global solutions providers who sell solutions to multi-national companies.

	•	Volume — These channel partners, who sell CA products that don’t require the same technical expertise to sell as enterprise solutions, are primarily geared toward small to medium-sized businesses (SMBs). We are focusing on the SMB market by evolving our products to keep them current and relevant, such as our Business Protection Suite, recruiting channel partners who know this segment, and increasing our marketing efforts.

3. International Expansion


	•	We are enhancing our sales infrastructure in Asia Pacific and Latin America. In February 2006, we opened our new Asia Pacific & Japan headquarters in Hong Kong.

	•	We are also growing our India Technology Center (in Hyderabad); tapping an important talent pool in the Czech Republic (Prague) for mainframe development; and gaining important entree into fast-growing countries such as China.

	•	We use our Customer Interaction Centers in Tampa, Florida, and Barcelona, Spain, as our global channel and telemarketing sales-generators.

4. Strategic Acquisitions


	•	We consider acquisitions that will support our EITM approach, extend our market position, and/or expand our geographic footprint.

	•	These acquisitions fill technology gaps in our portfolio, strengthen our position in core focus areas, and help round out our EITM offerings to better serve our customers. In fiscal year 2006, we completed four significant acquisitions (see Note 2, “Acquisitions, Divestitures, and Restructuring”, in the Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements for more information).

Business Unit Structure

We have aligned our product development into five business units. Each business unit is led by a general manager who is accountable for the management and performance of their business unit, including product development and innovation, product marketing, quality, staffing, strategic planning and execution, and customer satisfaction. Our business units are Enterprise Systems Management, Security Management, Storage Management, Business Service Optimization, and the CA Products Group. This structure allows us to become more closely aligned with our customers’ needs, drive more accountability for the performance of each software area, and to be more responsive to the changing dynamics of the IT management software marketplace. We do not presently maintain profit and loss data on a business unit basis, and therefore they are not considered business segments.

Enterprise Systems Management

Our products for Enterprise Systems Management optimize the availability and performance of IT assets and provide a complete, integrated and open solution for policy-driven, dynamic IT management. This means customers can manage their IT resources in a way that allows them to be more flexible in responding to changing business dynamics. Our comprehensive set of solutions is built on a framework of common services so the solutions work together to simplify the complexity present in medium to large enterprises, telecommunications service providers and public sector organizations.

Our Enterprise Systems Management products manage assets and processes across the entire IT environment including networks, servers, storage, databases, applications and desktops or client devices, on both mainframe and distributed platforms. We offer our Enterprise Systems Management solutions in the following three categories:


	•	Service Availability — these products monitor and optimize the health, availability and performance of the infrastructure and the technologies critical to our customer’s business operations to make sure they are always up and running.

	•	Resource Optimization — these products, which include configuration management, provisioning and capacity management, provision assets dynamically according to business priorities or consumption rates, and help customers make sure they maximize their IT resources.

	•	Process Automation — these products, which include workload automation, automate tedious or error-prone manual procedures to reduce infrastructure downtime and allow customers to redeploy their valuable IT resources in more strategic ways.

The acquisition of Concord significantly strengthened our network management offering. The acquisition of Wily gave us an important added depth in application management. Both further augment our comprehensive Enterprise Systems Management portfolio.

Security Management

Our solutions for Security Management provide an innovative and comprehensive approach to IT security. Our products protect information assets and resources; provide appropriate system and information access to employees, customers and channel partners; and centrally manage security-related administration. We offer Security Management products in the following three categories:


	•	Identity and Access Management — these products empower IT organizations to manage growing internal and external user populations, secure an increasingly complex array of resources and services and comply with critical regulatory mandates.

	•	Threat Management — these products are designed to help customers identify and eliminate internal and external threats such as harmful computer viruses and security weaknesses associated with operating systems, databases, networks and passwords.

	•	Security Information Management — these products help to integrate and prioritize security information created by CA and third-party security products, enable customers to increase operational efficiencies, help ensure business continuity, help customers adhere to regulatory compliance, and mitigate risks.

Storage Management

Our Storage Management solutions simplify the protection and management of business information, data and storage resources to support business priorities. Customers use our solutions to proactively optimize storage operations and infrastructure — achieving operational efficiencies, risk mitigation, compliance, business flexibility and investment protection. We offer Storage Management solutions in the following four categories:


	•	Recovery Management — these solutions help customers mitigate risk and improve business continuity in a cost-effective manner by providing backup/recovery, tape and media management, and high-availability solutions.

	•	Resource Management — these solutions help customers achieve operational efficiency and gain business flexibility. They enable customers to identify information, data and storage resources; monitor the storage environment; classify data, information and resources based on their value to the business; and define and automate storage processes.

	•	Information Management — these solutions help customers address compliance issues as they pertain to message management, discovery and archive requirements, and extend the data lifecycle to align with corporate governance and business requirements.

	•	Mainframe — these solutions offer an integrated, intelligent enterprise-wide storage management approach enabling z/OS-centric businesses to reduce costs, mitigate risks and align business requirements with IT.

Our storage management and data availability solutions support networks, systems, servers, operating systems, desktops, databases, applications, arrays, and tape libraries across mainframe and distributed environments. The acquisition of iLumin strengthened our capabilities in information management.

Business Service Optimization

Our solutions for Business Service Optimization help organizations manage their IT investments. These products help translate business needs into IT requirements; provide visibility into the services being delivered and the cost of delivering those services; enable more effective management of an IT organization’s people, processes, and assets;

and help our customers make informed decisions about issues such as investment priorities and outsourcing. We offer Business Service Optimization products in the following four categories:


	•	Business Process Management — these solutions help companies reduce costs and mitigate risk by achieving process efficiency and agility through automation and the understanding and management of IT and business processes and policies.

	•	Service Management — these solutions enable IT and business alignment by defining IT service offerings in business terms, provisioning, supporting, and allocating costs for these service offerings, improving service levels, and managing change.

	•	Asset Management — these solutions help organizations control costs, improve process efficiencies and maximize their return on investments by managing the technical and business aspects of hardware and software from procurement through disposal.

	•	IT Governance — these solutions help assure operational excellence by linking IT decisions with business objectives; providing strong financial control, optimizing IT resources and assets, and controlling software changes. The acquisition of Niku significantly strengthened our IT governance offering.

CA Products Group

In addition to our leadership offerings in the above areas, we also offer products that address other aspects of the IT environment. This diverse group of solutions includes products that deliver value throughout the IT spectrum, grouped in the following four categories.


	•	Database Management systems — these solutions enable reliable management of large data and transaction volumes, exploit advances in database technology, and integrate these information stores to distributed and web-based business needs, leveraging database process integrity across the enterprise.

	•	Application Development systems — these solutions enable customers to build custom business applications in a variety of environments using technology-neutral business process definitions, and to test and deploy those applications across an evolving IT infrastructure.

	•	Enterprise Reporting and Information Management systems — these solutions enable customers to efficiently and rapidly report on and process business information.

	•	Other solutions — these solutions include a wide variety of tools and utilities to optimize the IT environment.

Office of the CTO

The Office of the CTO drives technology strategy across all of the business units and leads research and development for emerging technologies.


	•	Common Technologies — our Foundation Services and Management Database are technologies common across CA products that enable our products to work together easily and also to work with other vendors’ management software products to deliver an IT environment that is simpler, more secure, less costly to maintain, and more agile.

	•	Research — CA Labs drives research in advanced technologies related to management and security by performing research internally and working with major universities and standard setting bodies. Current areas of focus include securing and managing on-demand computing, grids, virtualized environments, and service-oriented architectures.

	•	Emerging Technology Incubator — the Office of the CTO also runs incubator projects to create and bring to market management and security solutions that enable customer adoption of new technologies. Current incubation projects focus on management of wireless networks, smart phones, and radio frequency identification technologies.


	•	Architecture — the Office of the CTO is chartered with ensuring that all CA products are implemented according to a proven and consistent technical architecture. Consistent architecture accelerates our support for key industry advances, such as the evolution of Service Oriented Architectures and Grid Computing and Virtualization. Having unified technical architecture also promotes greater product quality and integration while lowering development costs.

Technological Expertise

Certain aspects of our products and technology are proprietary. We rely on U.S. and foreign intellectual property laws, including patent, copyright, trademark, and trade secret laws to protect our proprietary rights. As of March 31, 2006, we have received approximately 600 patents worldwide and approximately 1,900 patent applications are pending worldwide for our technology. However, the extent and duration of protection given to different types of intellectual property rights vary under different countries’ legal systems. Generally, our U.S. and foreign patents expire at various times over the next twenty years. While the durations of our patents vary, we believe that the durations of our patents are adequate. The expiration of any of our patents will not have a material adverse effect on our business. In some countries, full-scale intellectual property protection for our products and technology may be unavailable, and/or the laws of other jurisdictions may not protect our proprietary technology rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States. We also maintain contractual restrictions in our agreements with customers, employees, and others to protect our intellectual property rights. In addition, we occasionally license software and technology from third parties, including some competitors, and incorporate them into our own software products.

The source code for our products is protected both as trade secrets and as copyrighted works. Some of our customers are beneficiaries of a source code escrow arrangement that enables the customer to obtain a contingent, future-limited right to access our source code. If our source code is accessed, the likelihood of misappropriation or other misuse of our intellectual property may increase.

We are not aware that our products or technologies infringe on the proprietary rights of third parties. Third parties, however, may assert infringement claims against us with respect to our products, and any such assertion may require us to enter into royalty arrangements or result in costly and time-consuming litigation. Although we have a number of U.S. and foreign patents and pending applications that may have value to various aspects of our products and technology, we are not aware of any single patent that is essential to us or to any of our principal business product areas.

We continue to invest extensively in product development and enhancements. We anticipate that we will continue to adapt our software products to the rapid changes in the computer industry and will continue to enhance our products to help them remain compatible with hardware changes. We expect that we will continue to be able to improve our software products to work with the latest hardware platforms and operating systems.

To keep CA on top of major technological advances and to ensure our products continue to work well with those of other vendors, CA is active in every major standards organization and takes the lead in many. Further, CA was the first major software company to earn the International Organization for Standardization’s (ISO) 9001:2000 Global Certification, the ultimate ISO certification.

In addition, CA has built a strong global product development staff in Australia, China, the Czech Republic, France, Germany, India, Israel, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Our technological efforts around the world ensure we maintain a global perspective of customer needs while cost-effectively tapping the skills and talents of developers worldwide, and enable us to efficiently and effectively deliver support to CA customers.

In the United States, product development is primarily performed at our facilities in Brisbane/Redwood City, California; San Diego, California; Lisle, Illinois; Framingham, Massachusetts; Mount Laurel, New Jersey; Islandia, New York; Plano, Texas; and Herndon, Virginia.

For the fiscal years ended March 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, the costs of product development and enhancements, including related support, charged to operations were $696 million, $704 million, and $693 million, respectively. In fiscal years 2006, 2005 and 2004, we capitalized costs of $84 million, $70 million, and $44 million, respectively, for internally developed software. The increase in capitalized costs for fiscal year 2006 as compared with fiscal year 2005 was principally related to an increase in capitalized development costs for our Unicenter r11 and Brightstor products.

Customers

No individual customer accounted for a material portion of our revenue during any of the past three fiscal years, or a material portion of the license contract value that has not yet been earned (deferred subscription value) reported at the end of any period in the past three fiscal years. At March 31, 2006, five customers accounted for approximately 71% of our outstanding prior business model net receivables, including one customer with a license arrangement that extends through fiscal year 2012 with a net unbilled receivable balance in excess of $400 million. The majority of our software products are used with relatively expensive computer hardware. As a result, most of our revenue is generated from customers who have the ability to make substantial commitments to software and hardware implementations. Our software products are used in a broad range of industries, businesses, and applications. Our customers include manufacturers, technology companies, retailers, banks, insurance companies, other financial services providers, educational institutions, health care institutions, and governmental agencies.

We have a large and broad base of customers. We currently serve companies across every major industry worldwide, as well as government and educational institutions. When customers enter into a software license agreement with us, they often pay for the right to use our software for a specified period of time. When the terms of these agreements expire, the customer must either renew the license agreement or pay usage and maintenance fees, if applicable, for the right to continue to use our software and receive support. We believe that our flexible business model allows us to maintain our customer base while allowing us the opportunity to cross-sell new software products and services to them.

Customer Satisfaction and Support

Customer satisfaction is important to CA. We tie a portion of individual compensation for approximately 700 senior CA managers to our customers’ satisfaction, which we measure through independent surveys. The goal of CA Technical Support is to provide our customers with industry leading support. We support our customers in the following ways:


	•	CA Technical Support — staffed with a highly skilled customer response team, we manage more than 70 Technical Support centers in over 25 countries providing quality support online or over the telephone regardless of customer location or language.

	•	SupportConnect — to help fully meet the needs of our customers, we provide online self-service resources. More than 190,000 customers use these resources to review their account information, research technical information, open and maintain incident reports, order and download products, and much more. Automated self-service resources are convenient to our customers and are a means of controlling costs for CA.

	•	Support Availability Management (SAM) — supporting our customers sometimes requires a “personal touch.” This service provides our customers with access to Support Availability Managers with specialized skills in accessing information and resolving issues at a site level.

	•	Channel Partners Support Program — in line with CA’s drive to increase our channel partner presence and sales, we believe CA channel partners should receive one of the best technical support programs in the industry.

We believe that our dedicated staff, online services, segment-specific offerings, SAMs and channel partners support program not only protect and enhance customer satisfaction today but also maintain customer loyalty to grow CA in the future.

Business Model

Customers face challenges when trying to achieve their desired returns on software investments. These challenges are compounded by traditional software pricing models that often force companies to make long-term commitments for projected capacities. When these projections are inaccurate, the desired returns on investment may not be achieved. Many companies are also concerned that, due to short product life cycles for some software products, new products may become available before the end of their current software license agreement periods. In addition, some companies, particularly those in new or evolving industries, want pricing structures that are linked to the growth of their businesses to minimize the risks of overestimating capacity projections.

We believe we can service our customers better by offering more flexible licensing terms to help our customers realize maximum value from their software investments. In October 2000, we formalized this philosophy and refer to it as our business model.

Our business model offers customers a wide range of purchasing and payment options. Our flexible licensing terms allow customers to license our software products for relatively short periods of time, including on a monthly basis. Through these flexible licensing agreements, customers can evaluate whether our software meets their needs before making larger commitments. As customers become more comfortable with their software investments, they typically license our software for longer terms, generally up to three years.

Some customers prefer to choose cost certainty and sign longer-term agreements. Under our flexible licensing terms, customers can license our software products under multi-year licenses, and most customers choose terms of one to three years, although longer terms are sometimes selected. We provide our customers with the option to change their product mix after an initial period of time to mitigate their risks. We also help customers reduce uncertainty by providing a standard pricing schedule based on simple usage tiers.

We also offer software licenses to customers based on the value created from our customers’ business processes by linking our pricing structure to the growth of our customers’ businesses. For example, an airline company may choose to license our software based on the number of passenger miles flown during a defined period. Although this practice is not widely utilized by our customers, we believe this metric-based approach is unique in the software industry and can provide us with a competitive advantage.

As a result of the flexible licensing terms we offer our customers, specifically the right to receive unspecified future upgrades for no additional fee, as well as maintenance included during the term of the license, we are required under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America to recognize revenue from our license agreements ratably over the license term. For a description of how ratable revenue recognition has impacted our financial results, refer to “Results of Operations” within Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

Sales and Marketing

Our sales organization operates on a worldwide basis. We operate through branches and subsidiaries located in 46 countries outside the United States. Each geographic territory offers all or most of our software products. Approximately 47% of our revenue in fiscal year 2006 was from operations outside of the United States. As of March 31, 2006, we had approximately 4,900 sales and sales support personnel.

In addition, CA Technology Services^tm performs technology assessments, design, implementation and optimization, as well as ongoing maintenance, of our customers’ IT infrastructures. CA Technology Services leverages the best resources within CA as well as our channel partners to help customers apply the right types of activities necessary to ensure success.

We also distribute, market, and support our software through a network of VARs, OEMs, distributors, and resellers. As noted earlier, one of our growth strategies is to strengthen these channel partner relationships and grow our indirect sales channel. We actively encourage VARs to market our software products. VARs often combine our software products with specialized consulting services and provide enhanced user-specific solutions to a particular market or sector. Facilities managers, including CSC, EDS, and IBM, often deliver IT services using our software products to companies that prefer to outsource their IT operations.

Competition

The markets in which we compete are marked by technological change, the steady emergence of new companies and products, evolving industry standards, and changing customer needs. Competitive differentiators include, but are not limited to: performance, quality, breadth of product group, integration of products, brand name recognition, price, functionality, customer support, frequency of upgrades and updates, manageability of products, and reputation.

We compete with many established companies in the markets we serve. Some of these companies have substantially greater financial, marketing, and technological resources, larger distribution capabilities, earlier access to customers, and greater opportunity to address customers’ various information technology requirements than we do. These factors may provide our competitors with an advantage in penetrating markets with their products. We also compete with many smaller, less established companies that may be able to focus more effectively on specific product areas or markets. Because of the breadth of our product offerings, an individual competitor does not generally compete with us across all of our product areas. Some of our key competitors include BMC, Compuware, EMC, HP, IBM, Mercury Interactive and Symantec. We believe that we have a competitive advantage in the marketplace with the breadth and quality of our product offerings; our products’ hardware independence; and the ability to offer our solutions as product modules or as integrated suites, so that customers can use them at their own pace.

Employees

The table below sets forth the approximate number of employees by location and functional area as of March 31, 2006:


	Employees as			Employees as
	of March 31,			of March 31,
Location	2006		Functional Area	2006

Corporate headquarters		2,200	Product development and support		5,800
			Sales and support		4,900
Other U.S. offices		6,200	Professional services		1,400
			Information technology support,
International offices		7,600	finance, and administration		3,900

Total		16,000	Total		16,000

As of March 31, 2006 and 2005, we had approximately 16,000 and 15,300 employees, respectively. The increase was due to approximately 900 employees added from acquisitions and approximately 600 employees added primarily to our product development groups in North America and India. This increase in personnel was offset by the impact of the restructuring plan announced in the second quarter of fiscal year 2006, which included a workforce reduction of approximately 800 positions worldwide. We believe our employee relations are satisfactory.


(d)	Financial Information About Geographic Areas

Refer to Note 4, “Segment and Geographic Information”, in the Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements for financial data pertaining to our segment and geographic operations.


(e)	Available Information

Our website address is ca.com. All filings we make with the SEC, including our Annual Report on Form 10-K, our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, our Current Reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments, are available for free on our website as soon as reasonably practicable after they are filed with or furnished to the SEC. Our SEC filings are available to be read or copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Information regarding the operation of the Public Reference Room can be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. Our filings can also be obtained for free on the SEC’s Internet site at sec.gov. The reference to our website address does not constitute incorporation by reference of the information contained on the website in this Exhibit or other filings with the SEC, and the information contained on the website is not part of this document.

Our website also contains information about our initiatives in corporate governance, including: our corporate governance principles; information concerning our Board of Directors (including e-mail communication with them); our Business Practices Standard of Excellence: Our Code of Conduct (applicable to all of our employees, including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer, and our directors); instructions for calling the CA Compliance and Ethics Helpline; information concerning our Board Committees, including the charters of the Audit and Compliance Committee, the Compensation and Human Resource Committee, the Corporate Governance Committee, and the Strategy Committee; information on the Deferred

Prosecution Agreement (DPA) we entered into in September 2004 as part of our settlement to resolve government investigations into past accounting practices including our progress under governance initiatives required under the DPA; and transactions in CA securities by directors and executive officers. These documents can also be obtained in print by writing to our Executive Vice President, General Counsel, and Corporate Secretary, Kenneth V. Handal, at the Company’s world headquarters in Islandia, New York, at the address listed on the cover of this Exhibit. Refer to the Corporate Governance section in the Investors section of our website for details.


Item 1A.	Risk Factors.

Current and potential stockholders should consider carefully the risk factors described below. Any of these factors, or others, many of which are beyond our control, could negatively affect our revenue, profitability and cash flow.

Our operating results and revenue are subject to fluctuations caused by many economic factors associated with our industry and the markets for our products which, in turn, may individually and collectively affect our revenue, profitability and cash flow in adverse and unpredictable ways.

Quarterly and annual results of operations are affected by a number of factors, associated with our industry and the markets for our products, including those listed below, which in turn could adversely affect our revenue, profitability and cash flow in the future.


	•	Timing and impact of threat outbreaks (e.g. worms and viruses);

	•	The rate of adoption of new product technologies and releases of new operating systems;

	•	Demand for products and services;

	•	Length of sales cycle;

	•	Customer difficulty in implementation of our products;

	•	Magnitude of price and product and/or services competition;

	•	Introduction of new hardware;

	•	General economic conditions in countries in which customers do a substantial amount of business;

	•	Changes in customer budgets for hardware, software and services;

	•	Ability to develop and introduce new or enhanced versions of our products;

	•	Changes in foreign currency exchange rates;

	•	Ability to control costs;

	•	The number and terms and conditions of licensing transactions;

	•	Reorganizations of the sales and technical services forces;

	•	The results of litigation, including the government and internal investigations; and

	•	Ability to retain and attract qualified personnel.

Any of the foregoing factors, among others, may cause our operating expenses to be disproportionately high, or cause our revenue and operating results to fluctuate. As a consequence, our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flow could be adversely affected. For a discussion of certain factors that could affect our cash flow in the future, for example, please see Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Liquidity and Capital Resources — Sources and Uses of Cash.” In addition, our financial results are subject to change in light of our current review of option grant practices and the possible resulting restatements described in the Explanatory Note at the beginning of this Exhibit.

The timing of orders from customers and channel partners may cause fluctuations in some of our key financial metrics which may impact our quarterly financial results and stock price.

Historically, the vast majority of our license agreements are executed in the last week of a quarter. Any failure or delay in executing new or renewed license agreements in a given quarter could cause fluctuations in some of our key financial metrics (i.e. billings or cash flow), which may have a material adverse effect on our quarterly financial results. The uneven sales pattern also makes it difficult to predict future billings and cash flow for each period and, accordingly, increases the risk of unanticipated variations in our quarterly results and financial condition. If we do not achieve our forecasted results for a particular period, our stock price could decline significantly.

Given the global nature of our business, economic or political events beyond our control can affect our business in unpredictable ways.

International revenue has historically represented a significant percentage of our total worldwide revenue. Continued success in selling our products outside the United States will depend on a variety of market and business factors, including:


	•	Reorganizations of the sales and technical services workforce;

	•	Fluctuations in foreign exchange currency rates;

	•	Staffing key managerial positions;

	•	The ability to successfully localize software products for a significant number of international markets;

	•	General economic conditions in foreign countries;

	•	Political stability; and

	•	Trade restrictions such as tariffs, duties or other controls affecting foreign operations.

Any of the foregoing factors, among others, could adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flow.

We have entered into a Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA) with the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of New York (USAO) and a Final Consent Judgment with the SEC (the Consent Judgment) and if we violate either agreement we may be subject to, among other things, criminal prosecution or civil penalties which could adversely affect our credit ratings, stock price, ability to attract or retain employees and, therefore, our sales, revenue and client base.

Our agreements with the USAO and the SEC resolve their investigations into certain of our past accounting practices, including our revenue recognition policies and procedures, and obstruction of their investigations, provided we comply with certain continuing requirements under these agreements. We describe some of these requirements below. (For more information about our agreements with the USAO and the SEC, see Note 7, “Commitments and Contingencies”, in the Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements as well as our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 22, 2004.)

The DPA

If it is determined that we: deliberately gave false, incomplete or misleading information pursuant to the DPA; have committed any federal crimes subsequent to the DPA; or otherwise knowingly, intentionally and materially violated any provision of the DPA, we will be subject to prosecution for any federal criminal violation of which the USAO has knowledge. Any such prosecution may be based on information we have provided to the USAO, the SEC and other governmental agencies in connection with our cooperation under the DPA. This would include information provided because of our entry into the DPA that otherwise may not have been available to the USAO or may otherwise have been subject to privilege. Our continued cooperation with the USAO, the SEC and the Independent Examiner (see below) pursuant to the DPA and Consent Judgment may lead to the discovery of additional information regarding the conduct of the Company, including the conduct of members of former management in

prior periods. We cannot predict the impact, if any, of any such information on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flow.

The Consent Judgment

Pursuant to the Consent Judgment, we are enjoined from violating a number of provisions of the federal securities laws. Any further violation of these laws could result in civil remedies, including sanctions, fines and penalties, which may be far more severe than if the violation had occurred without the Consent Judgment being in place. Additionally, if we breach the terms of the Consent Judgment, the SEC may petition the Court to vacate the Consent Judgment and restore the SEC’s original action to the active docket for all purposes. If the action were restored, the SEC could use information in the action that we have provided to the USAO, the SEC and other governmental agencies in connection with our cooperation under the Consent Judgment. This would include information provided because of our entry into the Consent Judgment that otherwise may not have been available to the SEC or may otherwise have been subject to privilege.

General

Under both the DPA and the Consent Judgment, we are obligated to undertake a number of internal reforms including but not limited to: adding new management and independent directors; establishing a Compliance Committee of the Board of Directors and an executive disclosure committee; establishing new comprehensive records management policies; taking steps to implement best practices regarding recognition of software license revenue; establishing a comprehensive compliance and ethics program; reorganizing our Finance and Internal Audit Departments; establishing a plan to improve communication with government agencies engaged in inquiries or investigations relating to the Company; enhancing our hotline for employees to report potential violations of the law or other misconduct; and agreeing to the appointment of an Independent Examiner, who is serving a term of 18 months (subject to extension by the USAO and the SEC) and is examining our practices and began issuing reports on such practices to the USAO, the SEC and our Board of Directors beginning in September 2005 and has and will continue to do so quarterly thereafter (for more information about the Independent Examiner and the potential extension of this term, see Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation — Significant Business Events”). We have taken many steps to carry out these internal reforms (for more information about our reforms, see Note 7, “Commitments and Contingencies”, in the Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements). In the short-term, we cannot gauge what impact, if any, the adoption of these reforms (including the reports of the Independent Examiner) may have on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flow or any diversion of management attention and employee resources from core business functions or opportunities that may result.

If it were determined that we breached the terms of the DPA or the Consent Judgment, we cannot predict the scope, timing or outcome of the actions that would be taken by the USAO or the SEC. These actions could include the institution of administrative, civil injunctive or criminal proceedings, the imposition of fines and penalties, which may be significant, suspensions or debarments from government product and/or services contracts, and other remedies and sanctions, any of which could lead to an adverse impact on our credit ratings and ability to obtain financing, an adverse impact on our stock price, loss of additional senior management, the inability to attract or retain key employees and the loss of customers. In addition, our employees could potentially commit illegal acts which, under the law, may be ascribed to us under certain circumstances. We cannot predict what impact, if any, these matters may have on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flow.

Moreover, under both the DPA and the Consent Judgment, we are obligated to cooperate with the government in its ongoing investigations of past conduct. While we do not anticipate any further material adjustments to our financial statements for completed periods arising from those investigations, the processes described above have not been fully completed and we may be required to take additional remedial measures. We are also obligated under the DPA to comply with SEC rules, including those related to the filing of periodic reports. As described in the Explanatory Note at the beginning of this Exhibit, we will not file our Annual Report on Form 10-K by the deadline of June 29, 2006.

Changes to compensation of our sales organization could adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flow.

We may update our compensation plans for the sales organization from time to time in order to align the sales force with the Company’s economic interests. Under the terms of the sales compensation agreements, management seeks to retain broad discretion to change or modify various aspects of the plan such as quotas or territory assignments. The ability to exercise this discretion is governed by the laws of numerous countries and states within the U.S. in which CA operates. Where CA does exercise such discretion, the changes may lead to outcomes that are not anticipated or intended and may impact our cost of doing business and/or employee morale, all of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flow. We modified our commission plans for fiscal year 2006 which led to substantial unforeseen expenses. The commission plans for fiscal year 2007, while revised, continue to be reviewed and may be subject to risks similar to those identified above. See Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”, for how changes made to the commission plan for fiscal year 2006 impacted results. Refer to Item 9A, “Controls and Procedures”, for additional information relating to the Company’s identification of a material weakness associated with sales commissions for fiscal year 2006.

Failure to expand our channel partner programs related to the sale of CA solutions may result in lost sales opportunities, increases in expenses and weakening in our competitive position.

We sell CA solutions through system integrators and value-added resellers in channel partner programs that require training and expertise to sell these solutions, and global penetration to grow these aspects of our business. The failure to expand these channel partner programs and penetrate these markets may adversely impact our success with channel partners, resulting in lost sales opportunities and an increase in expenses, as well as weaken our competitive position.

If we do not adequately manage and evolve our financial reporting and managerial systems and processes, including the successful implementation of our enterprise resource planning software from SAP AG, our ability to manage and grow our business may be harmed.

Our ability to successfully implement our business plan and comply with regulations requires effective planning and management systems and processes. We will need to continue to improve existing and implement new operational and financial systems, procedures and controls to manage our business effectively in the future. As a result, we have licensed enterprise resource planning (ERP) software from SAP AG and have begun a process to expand and upgrade our operational and financial systems. Phase one of the implementation was completed in April 2006 and included North America and worldwide human resources. Any delay in the implementation of, or disruption in the transition to, our new or enhanced systems, procedures or internal controls, could adversely affect our ability to accurately forecast sales demand, manage our supply chain, achieve accuracy in the conversion of electronic data and records, and report financial and management information, including the filing of our quarterly or annual reports with the SEC, on a timely and accurate basis. As a result of the conversion from prior systems and processes, data integrity problems may be discovered that if not corrected could impact our business or financial results. In addition, as we add functionality to the ERP software and complete implementations in other geographic regions, new issues could arise that we have not foreseen. Such issues could adversely affect our ability to do, among other things, the following in a timely manner: provide quotes; take customer orders; ship products; provide services and support to our customers; bill and track our customers; fulfill contractual obligations; and otherwise run our business. Failure to properly or adequately address these issues could result in the diversion of management’s attention and resources, impact our ability to manage our business and negatively impact our results of operations, cash flows and stock price.

We may encounter difficulties in successfully integrating companies and products that we have acquired or may acquire into our existing business and, therefore, such failed integration may adversely affect our infrastructure, market presence, results of operations and stock price.

We have in the past and expect in the future to acquire complementary companies, products, services and technologies. The risks we may encounter include: we may find that the acquired company or assets do not further

improve our financial and strategic position as planned; we may have difficulty integrating the operations, personnel and commission plans of the acquired business; we may have difficulty forecasting or reporting results subsequent to acquisitions; we may have difficulty retaining the technical skills needed to provide services on the acquired products; we may have difficulty incorporating the acquired technologies or products with our existing product lines; we may have product liability, customer liability or intellectual property liability associated with the sale of the acquired company’s products; our ongoing business may be disrupted by transition or integration issues; our management’s attention may be diverted from other business concerns; we may be unable to obtain timely approvals from governmental authorities under applicable competition and antitrust laws; we may have difficulty maintaining uniform standards, controls, procedures and policies; our relationships with current and new employees, customers and distributors could be impaired; the acquisition may result in increased litigation risk, including litigation from terminated employees or third parties; and our due diligence process may fail to identify significant issues with the target company’s product quality, financial disclosures, accounting practices, internal control deficiencies, including material weaknesses, product architecture, legal contingencies and other matters. These factors could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition or cash flows, particularly in the case of a large acquisition or number of acquisitions. To the extent we issue shares of stock or other rights to purchase stock, including options, to pay for acquisitions, existing stockholders’ interests may be diluted and earnings per share may decrease.

We are subject to intense competition in product and service offerings and pricing, and we expect to face increased competition in the future, which could hinder our ability to attract and retain employees and diminish demand for our products and, therefore, reduce our sales, revenue and market presence.

The markets for our products are intensely competitive, and we expect product and service offerings and pricing competition to increase. Some of our competitors have longer operating histories, greater name recognition, a larger installed base of customers in any particular market niche, larger technical staffs, established relationships with hardware vendors and/or greater financial, technical and marketing resources. Competitors for our various products include large technology companies. We also face competition from numerous smaller companies that specialize in specific aspects of the highly fragmented software industry and shareware authors that may develop competing products. In addition, new companies enter the market on a frequent and regular basis, offering products that compete with those offered by us. Moreover, many customers historically have developed their own products that compete with those offered by us. The competition may affect our ability to attract and retain the technical skills needed to provide services to our customers, forcing us to become more reliant on delivery of services through third parties. This, in turn, could increase operating costs and decrease our revenue, profitability and cash flow. Additionally, competition from any of these sources can result in price reductions or displacement of our products, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flow.

Our competitors include large vendors of hardware or operating system software. The widespread inclusion of products that perform the same or similar functions as our products bundled within computer hardware or other companies’ software products could reduce the perceived need for our products and services, or render our products obsolete and unmarketable. Furthermore, even if these incorporated products are inferior or more limited than our products, customers may elect to accept the incorporated products rather than purchase our products. In addition, the software industry is currently undergoing consolidation as software companies seek to offer more extensive suites and broader arrays of software products, as well as integrated software and hardware solutions. This consolidation may negatively impact our competitive position, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flow. Refer to Item 1, “Business — (c) Narrative Description of the Business — Competition”, for additional information.

Failure to adapt to technological change in a timely manner could adversely affect our revenues and earnings.

If we fail to keep pace with technological change in our industry, such failure would have an adverse effect on our revenues and earnings. We operate in a highly competitive industry characterized by rapid technological change, evolving industry standards, changes in customer requirements and frequent new product introductions and enhancements. During the past several years, many new technological advancements and competing products entered the marketplace. The distributed systems and application management markets in which we operate are far

more crowded and competitive than our traditional mainframe systems management markets. Our ability to compete effectively and our growth prospects depend upon many factors, including the success of our existing distributed systems products, the timely introduction and success of future software products, and the ability of our products to interoperate and perform well with existing and future leading databases and other platforms supported by our products. We have experienced long development cycles and product delays in the past, particularly with some of our distributed systems products, and expect to have delays in the future. In addition, we have incurred, and expect to continue to incur, significant research and development costs, as we introduce new products. If there are delays in new product introductions or less-than-anticipated market acceptance of these new products, we will have invested substantial resources without realizing adequate revenues in return, and our revenues and earnings could be adversely affected.

If our products do not remain compatible with ever-changing operating environments we could lose customers and the demand for our products and services could decrease, which would negatively impact sales and revenue.

IBM, HP, Sun Microsystems, EMC and Microsoft are the largest suppliers of systems and computing software and, in most cases, are the manufacturers of the computer hardware systems used by most of our customers. Historically, these operating system developers have modified or introduced new operating systems, systems software and computer hardware. Such new products could, in the future, incorporate features that perform functions currently performed by our products, or could require substantial modification of our products to maintain compatibility with these companies’ hardware or software. Although we have to date been able to adapt our products and our business to changes introduced by hardware manufacturers and system software developers, there can be no assurance that we will be able to do so in the future. Failure to adapt our products in a timely manner to such changes or customer decisions to forego the use of our products in favor of those with comparable functionality contained either in the hardware or operating system could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flow.

Certain software that we use in daily operations is licensed from third parties and thus may not be available to us in the future, which has the potential to delay product development and production and, therefore, could adversely affect our revenues and profits.

Some of our products contain software licensed from third parties. Some of these licenses may not be available to us in the future on terms that are acceptable to us or allow our products to remain competitive. The loss of these licenses or the inability to maintain any of them on commercially acceptable terms could delay development of future products or the enhancement of existing products. We may also choose to pay a premium price for such a license in certain circumstances where continuity of the product would outweigh the premium cost of the license. We do not consider the revenue from products using software licensed from third parties to be material. However, there can be no assurance that, at a given point of time, any of the above will not have an adverse impact on our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flow.

Certain software we use is from open source code sources which under certain circumstances may lead to increased costs and, therefore, decreased cash flow.

Some of our products contain software from open source code sources. The use of such open source code may subject us to certain conditions, including the obligation to offer our products that use open source code for no cost. We monitor our use of such open source code to avoid subjecting our products to conditions we do not intend. However, the use of such open source code may ultimately subject some of our products to unintended conditions so that we are required to take remedial action that may divert resources away from our development efforts. We believe that the use of such open source code will not have a significant impact on our operations and that our products will be viable after any remediation efforts. However, there can be no assurance that future conditions involving such open source code will not have an adverse impact on our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flow.

Discovery of errors in our software could adversely affect our revenues and earnings and subject us to product liability claims, which may be costly and time consuming.

The software products we offer are inherently complex. Despite testing and quality control, we cannot be certain that errors will not be found in current versions, new versions or enhancements of our products after commencement of commercial shipments. If new or existing customers have difficulty deploying our products or require significant amounts of customer support, our operating margins could be adversely affected. Moreover, we could face possible claims and higher development costs if our software contains undetected errors or if we fail to meet our customers’ expectations. Significant technical challenges also arise with our products because our customers purchase and deploy our products across a variety of computer platforms and integrate them with a number of third-party software applications and databases. These combinations increase our risk further because in the event of a system-wide failure, it may be difficult to determine which product is at fault; thus, we may be harmed by the failure of another supplier’s products. As a result of the foregoing, we could experience:


	•	Loss of or delay in revenues and loss of market share;

	•	Loss of customers, including the inability to do repeat business with existing key customers;

	•	Damage to our reputation;

	•	Failure to achieve market acceptance;

	•	Diversion of development resources;

	•	Increased service and warranty costs;

	•	Legal actions by customers against us which could, whether or not successful, increase costs and distract our management;

	•	Increased insurance costs; and

	•	Failure to successfully complete service engagements for product installations and implementations.

In addition, a product liability claim, whether or not successful, could be time-consuming and costly and thus could have a material adverse affect on our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flow.

Our credit ratings have been downgraded and could be downgraded further which would require us to pay additional interest under our credit agreement and could adversely affect our ability to borrow in the future.

In June 2006, both Moody’s Investors Service (Moody’s) and Fitch Ratings (Fitch) confirmed their ratings of our senior unsecured notes at Ba1 and BBB-, respectively, but changed their outlooks on the ratings from positive and stable, respectively, to negative. Our senior unsecured notes are rated BBB- by Standard & Poor’s (S&P) and the outlook is also negative.

Moody’s, S&P, Fitch or any other credit rating agency may further downgrade or take other negative action with respect to our credit ratings in the future. If our credit ratings are further downgraded or other negative action is taken, we would be required to, among other things, pay additional interest under our credit agreement, if it is utilized. Any downgrades could affect our ability to obtain additional financing in the future and may affect the terms of any such financing. This could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flow. We have not yet discussed with the ratings agencies our on-going review and potential restatements described in the Explanatory Note at the beginning of this Exhibit and we cannot determine what actions, if any, they may take in response to these actions.

We have a significant amount of debt and failure to generate sufficient cash as our debt becomes due or to renew credit lines prior to their expiration may adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flow.

As of March 31, 2006, we had approximately $1.81 billion of debt outstanding, consisting of unsecured fixed-rate senior note obligations and convertible senior notes. Refer to Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Contractual Obligations and Commitments”, for the payment schedule of our long-term debt obligations, inclusive of interest. We expect that existing cash, cash equivalents, marketable securities, cash provided from operations and our bank credit facilities will be sufficient to meet ongoing cash requirements. However, failure to generate sufficient cash as our debt becomes due or to renew credit lines prior to their expiration may adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flow.

The delay in filing our Annual Report on Form 10-K could result in defaults under our financing agreements.

We have three indentures governing our public debt securities that require that we file with the relevant trustee the reports we are required to file with the SEC, including the Form 10-K. We have $1,810 million in outstanding debt in four separate series under these four indentures. Since the delay in filing our Form 10-K with the SEC has led to a delay in filing the Form 10-K with the relevant trustees, we are not in compliance with our reporting obligations under these indentures. As a result of our non-compliance, a trustee or the holders of at least 25% of the outstanding aggregate principal amount of the securities of any series under the indentures may provide us with a notice of default with respect to a series of debt securities. If we fail to cure the non-compliance within 90 days after receipt of that notice, then the trustee or those holders have the right to accelerate the maturity of the relevant series of debt securities. This acceleration would trigger the cross-acceleration provisions under the other series of debt securities issued under the indentures.

Our $1 billion credit facility, which is undrawn, requires that we provide our lenders with annual audited financial statements within 90 days after the end of our fiscal year. As a result of the delay in the completion of our audited financial statements, we are not in compliance with this financial statement delivery covenant. A restatement could also, depending on its nature and materiality, result in a breach of a representation under our credit facility. Even though our credit facility is undrawn, the agent for the lenders or the lenders could provide us with a notice of default as a result of our non-compliance, and we would have 30 days to cure the non-compliance. In the absence of a cure or a waiver, we will be unable to make drawings under our credit facility.

Until we file our Form 10-K, there will be limited public information available concerning our results of operations and financial condition. The delay in the filing of our Form 10-K and the potential restatement, and the related uncertainties, may also have other actual or potential adverse effects in addition to those discussed above.

Until we have filed our Form 10-K, there will be limited public information available concerning our results of operations and financial condition. The absence of more recent financial statements may have an adverse effect on us and on the market prices of our securities.

The delay in the filing of our Form 10-K and the potential restatement, and the related uncertainties, may also have other actual or potential adverse effects in addition to those discussed above, including adverse effect on the perception of the Company by existing and potential customers and suppliers and continuing adverse effect on our credit standing and on investor confidence.

Failure to protect our intellectual property rights would weaken our competitive position.

Our future success is highly dependent upon our proprietary technology, including our software. Failure to protect such technology could lead to our loss of valuable assets and competitive advantage. We protect our proprietary information through the use of patents, copyrights, trademarks, trade secret laws, confidentiality procedures and contractual provisions. Notwithstanding our efforts to protect our proprietary rights, policing unauthorized use or copying of our proprietary information is difficult. Unauthorized use or copying occurs from time to time and litigation to enforce intellectual property rights could result in significant costs and diversion of resources. Moreover, the laws of some foreign jurisdictions do not afford the same degree of protection to our proprietary

rights as do the laws of the United States. For example, we rely on “shrink-wrap” or “click-on” licenses which may be unenforceable in whole or in part in some jurisdictions in which we operate. In addition, patents we have obtained may be circumvented, challenged, invalidated or designed around by other companies. If we do not adequately protect our intellectual property for these or other reasons our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flow could be adversely affected. Refer to “Item 1, Business — (c) Narrative Description of the Business — Technological Expertise”, for additional information.

We may become dependent upon large transactions and the failure to close such transactions could adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flow.

We have historically been dependent upon large-dollar enterprise transactions with individual customers. As a result of the flexibility afforded by our business model, we anticipate that there will be fewer of these transactions in the future. There can be no assurances, however, that we will not be reliant on large-dollar enterprise transactions in the future, and the failure to close such transactions could adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flow.

Our customers’ data centers and IT environments may be subject to hacking or other breaches, harming the market perception of the effectiveness of our products.

If an actual or perceived breach of our customers’ network security occurs, allowing access to our customers’ data centers or other parts of their IT environments, regardless of whether the breach is attributable to our products, the market perception of the effectiveness of our products could be harmed. Because the techniques used by computer hackers to access or sabotage networks change frequently and may not be recognized until launched against a target, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques. Alleviating any of these problems could require significant expenditures of our capital and diversion of our resources from development efforts. Additionally, these efforts could cause interruptions, delays or cessation of our product licensing, or modification of our software, which could cause us to lose existing or potential customers, adversely affecting our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flow.

Our software products, data centers and IT environments may be subject to hacking or other breaches, harming the market perception of the effectiveness of our products.

Although we believe we have sufficient controls in place to prevent intentional disruptions, we expect to be an ongoing target of attacks specifically designed to impede the performance of our products. Similarly, experienced computer programmers, or hackers, may attempt to penetrate our network security or the security of our data centers and IT environments and misappropriate proprietary information or cause interruptions of our services. If these intentionally disruptive efforts are successful, our activities could be adversely affected, our reputation and future sales could be harmed and our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flow could be adversely affected.

General economic conditions may lead our customers to delay or forgo technology upgrades which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flow.

Our products are designed to improve the productivity and efficiency of our customers’ information processing resources. However, a general slowdown in the world economy or a particular region, particularly with respect to discretionary spending for software, could cause customers to delay or forgo decisions to license new products, to upgrade their existing environments or to acquire services, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flow.

The use of third-party microcode could negatively impact our product development.

We anticipate ongoing use of microcode or firmware provided by hardware manufacturers. Microcode and firmware are essentially software programs embedded in hardware and are, therefore, less flexible than other types of software. We believe that such continued use will not have a significant impact on our operations and that our products will remain compatible with any changes to such code. However, there can be no assurance that future

technological developments involving such microcode will not have an adverse impact on our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flow.

We may lose access to third-party operating systems which would adversely affect future product development.

In the past, certain of our licensees using proprietary operating systems were furnished with “source code”, which makes the operating system understandable to programmers; “object code”, which directly controls the hardware; and other technical documentation. Since the availability of source code facilitated the development of systems and applications software, which must interface with the operating systems, independent software vendors, such as us, were able to develop and market compatible software. Microsoft, IBM and other vendors have a policy of restricting the use or availability of the source code for some of their operating systems. To date, this policy has not had a material effect on us. Some companies, however, may adopt more restrictive policies in the future or impose unfavorable terms and conditions for such access. These restrictions may, in the future, result in higher research and development costs for us in connection with the enhancement and modification of our existing products and the development of new products. Although we do not expect that such restrictions will have this adverse effect, there can be no assurances that such restrictions or other restrictions will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flow.

The markets for some or all of our key product areas may not grow.

Our products are aligned by software business unit. Our business units consist of Enterprise Systems Management, Security Management, Storage Management, Business Service Optimization and the CA Products Group — which encompass solutions from a number of CA brands that fall outside of our core areas of systems and security management. Some or all of these areas may not grow, may decline in growth, or customers may decline or forgo use of products in some or all of these product areas. This is particularly true in newly emerging areas. A decline in sales in these product areas could result in decreased demand for our products and services, which would adversely impact our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flow.

Third parties could claim that our products infringe their intellectual property rights which could result in significant litigation expense or settlement with unfavorable terms that could adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flow.

From time to time we receive notices from third parties claiming infringement of various forms of their intellectual property. Investigation of these claims, whether with or without merit, can be expensive and could affect development, marketing or shipment of our products. As the number of software patents issued increases, it is likely that additional claims, with or without merit, will be asserted. Defending against such claims is time-consuming and could result in significant litigation expense or settlement with unfavorable terms that could adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flow.

Fluctuations in foreign currencies could result in translation losses.

Most of the revenue and expenses of our foreign subsidiaries are denominated in local currencies. Given the relatively long sales cycle that is typical for many of our products, foreign currency fluctuations could result in substantial changes due to the foreign currency impact upon translation of these transactions into U.S. dollars. Additionally, fluctuations of the exchange rates of foreign currencies against the U.S. dollar can affect our revenue within those markets, all of which may adversely impact our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flow.

Our stock price is subject to significant fluctuations.

Our stock price is subject to significant fluctuations in response to variations in quarterly operating results, the gain or loss of significant license agreements, changes in earnings estimates by analysts, announcements related to accounting issues, announcements of technological innovations or new products by us or our competitors, changes in domestic and international economic and business conditions, general conditions in the software and computer industries and other events or factors. In addition, the stock market in general has experienced extreme price and

volume fluctuations that have affected the market price of many companies in industries that are similar or related to those in which we operate and that have been unrelated to the operating performance of these companies. These market fluctuations have in the past adversely affected and may continue to adversely affect the market price of our common stock, which in turn could affect the value of our stock-based compensation and our ability to retain and attract key employees.

Any failure by us to execute our restructuring plan successfully could result in total costs and expenses that are greater than expected.

In July 2005, we announced a restructuring plan to increase efficiency and productivity and to more closely align our investments with strategic growth opportunities. The plan includes a workforce reduction of approximately five percent or 800 positions worldwide as well as facility and procurement rationalization. We may have further workforce reductions or restructuring actions in the future. Risks associated with these actions and other workforce management issues include delays in implementation of anticipated workforce reductions, changes in restructuring plans that increase or decrease the number of employees affected, decreases in employee morale and the failure to meet operational targets due to the loss of employees, any of which may impair our ability to achieve anticipated cost reductions or may otherwise harm our business.

Taxation of extraterritorial income could adversely affect our results.

In August 2001, a World Trade Organization (WTO) dispute panel determined that the tax provisions of the FSC Repeal and Extraterritorial Income Exclusion Act of 2000 (ETI) constitute an export subsidy prohibited by the WTO Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures. The U.S. government appealed the panel’s decision and lost its appeal. On March 1, 2004, the European Union (EU) began imposing retaliatory tariffs on a specified list of U.S. – source goods. In order to comply with international trade rules, the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the Act) repealed the current tax treatment for ETI. The Act replaces the ETI provisions with a domestic manufacturing deduction and includes transition provisions for the ETI phase-out. We are reviewing the provisions of the Act and the impact on our effective tax rate. The WTO challenged the Act, claiming that the transition relief and grandfathering provisions of the Act amounted to a continuation of the ETI export subsidy. On February 13, 2006, the Appellate Body of the WTO agreed that the Act violated international free-trade rules. As a result, the EU announced that by May 14, 2006 it would reinstate retaliatory tariffs that had been previously lifted. In order to comply with international free-trade rules, The Tax Increase Prevention and Reconciliation Act of 2005 (TIPRA) repealed certain provisions of the Act found to be objectionable by the EU. In response to TIPRA, the EU announced it would withdraw the retaliatory sanctions that were to have resumed May 16, 2006.

Other potential tax liabilities may adversely affect our results.

We are subject to income taxes in both the United States and numerous foreign jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required in determining our worldwide provision for income taxes. In the ordinary course of our business, there are many transactions and calculations where the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. We are regularly under audit by tax authorities. Although we believe our tax estimates are reasonable, the final determination of tax audits and any related litigation could be materially different than that which is reflected in historical income tax provisions and accruals. Should additional taxes be assessed as a result of an audit or litigation, a material effect on our income tax provision and net income in the period or periods in which that determination is made could result. In the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2006, we determined that we did not properly calculate certain tax charges and accordingly had to adjust such charges. As described in the Explanatory Note at the beginning of this Exhibit, we are continuing to review whether additional adjustments may be necessary in light of our current review of option grant practices. Refer to Item 9A, “Controls and Procedures”, for additional information.


Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments.

None.


Item 2.	Properties.

Our principal real estate properties are located in areas necessary to meet sales and operating requirements. All of the properties are considered to be both suitable and adequate to meet current and anticipated operating requirements.

As of March 31, 2006, we leased 112 facilities throughout the United States and 146 facilities outside the United States. Our lease obligations expire on various dates with the longest commitment extending to 2023. We believe all of our leases will be renewable at our option as they become due.

In the United States, we own an approximately 850,000 square foot corporate headquarters in Islandia, New York, an approximately 100,000 square foot distribution center in Central Islip, New York, as well as an approximately 15,000 square foot facility in Greensville, South Carolina. We own one facility in Germany totaling approximately 100,000 square feet, two facilities in Italy which total approximately 140,000 square feet, and an approximately 215,000 square foot European headquarters in the United Kingdom.

We periodically review the benefits of owning our properties. On occasion, we enter into sale-leaseback transactions and use the proceeds to fund strategic actions such as acquisitions, product development, or stock-repurchases. Depending upon the strategic importance of a particular location and management’s long-term plans, the duration of the initial lease term in sale-leaseback transactions may vary.

We own and lease various computer, telecommunications, electronic, and transportation equipment. We also lease mainframe and distributed computers at our facilities in Islandia, New York, and Lisle, Illinois. This equipment is used for internal product development, technical support efforts, and administrative purposes. We consider our computer and other equipment to be adequate for our current and anticipated needs. Refer to “Contractual Obligations” under Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and Note 7, “Commitments and Contingencies”, in the Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements for information concerning lease obligations.


Item 3.	Legal Proceedings.

Refer to Note 7, “Commitments and Contingencies”, in the Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding legal proceedings.


Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

None.

Executive Officers of the Registrant.

The name, age, present position, and business experience of our executive officers as of June 29, 2006, are listed below:


Name	Age		Position

John A. Swainson		52	President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director
Russell M. Artzt		59	Executive Vice President — Products
James Bryant		61	Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer
Michael J. Christenson		47	Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
Robert G. Cirabisi		42	Acting Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President and Corporate Controller
Donald Friedman		60	Executive Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer
Andrew Goodman		47	Executive Vice President — Worldwide Human Resources
Kenneth V. Handal		57	Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
Gary Quinn		45	Executive Vice President — Partner Sales
Patrick J. Gnazzo		59	Senior Vice President, Business Practices, and Chief Compliance Officer
Una O’Neill		36	Senior Vice President — Technology Services
Alan S. Nugent		51	Senior Vice President and Chief Technology Officer
Mary Stravinskas		45	Senior Vice President and Treasurer

Mr. Swainson has been Chief Executive Officer of the Company since February 2005 and President and Director since November 2004. From November 2004 to February 2005, he served as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer-elect. From July to November 2004, Mr. Swainson was Vice President of Worldwide Sales and Marketing of IBM Corporation’s Software Group, responsible for selling its diverse line of software products through multiple channels. From 1997 to July 2004, he was General Manager of the Application Integration and Middleware division of IBM Corporation’s Software Group, a division he started in 1997. Mr. Swainson joined the Company in November 2004.

Mr. Artzt has been an Executive Vice President of the Company since April 1987 and Executive Vice President of Products since 2004. From April 2002 to 2004, he served as Executive Vice President — eTrust Solutions and from 1987 to March 2002, he served as Executive Vice President — Research and Development. Mr. Artz joined the Company in June 1976.

Mr. Bryant has been Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer of the Company since June 2006. From 2005 to June 2006, he was a member of Common Angels, a Boston-based investment group that provides funding and mentoring for high technology start-ups; from 2003 to June 2006 he was a Selectman for the Town of Hamilton, Massachusetts; and from 1994 to 2002, he served as Vice President of Finance in the Software Group at IBM. Mr Bryant joined the Company in June 2006.

Mr. Christenson has been Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company since April 2006. From February 2005 to April 2006, he served as Executive Vice President of Strategy and Business Development. Mr. Christenson retired in 2004 from Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. after a 23 year career as an investment banker where he was responsible for that company’s Global Private Equity Investment Banking, North American Regional Investment Banking, and Latin American Investment Banking. In addition, he was a member of the Operating Committee of the Global Investment Banking Division and the Investment Committee of SSB Capital Partners. Prior to these roles, he served as head of Citigroup’s Global Technology Investment Banking and Global Media Investment Banking. Mr. Christenson joined the Company in February 2005.

Mr. Cirabisi has been acting Chief Financial Officer since May 2006 and Senior Vice President and Corporate Controller of the Company since July 2005. From July 2004 to June 2005, he served as Senior Vice President and

Chief Accounting Officer; from April 2002 to July 2004, he served as Vice President of Investor Relations; and from May 2000 to April 2002, he was U.S. Controller. Mr. Cirabisi joined the Company in May 2000.

Mr. Friedman has been Executive Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer of the Company since April 2005. From September 2001 to April 2005, he provided management and marketing consulting services to technology companies and from December 2000 through September 2001 he was President and CEO of Sheldahl Inc., a provider of interconnect products and flexible circuit board technologies. Mr. Friedman joined the Company in April 2005.

Mr. Goodman has been Executive Vice President of Worldwide Human Resources of the Company since July 2005. From July 2002 to July 2005, he served as Senior Vice President of Human Resources. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Goodman was First Vice President of Global Technology Group Human Resources at Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. Mr. Goodman joined the Company in July 2002.

Mr. Handal has been Executive Vice President and General Counsel of the Company since July 2004 and Corporate Secretary since April 2005. From 1996 to July 2004, Mr. Handal served as Associate General Counsel for the Altria family of companies, which includes Kraft Foods and Philip Morris. Mr. Handal joined the Company in July 2004.

Mr. Quinn has been Executive Vice President for Partner Sales since May 2006. From April 2005 to May 2006, he served as Executive Vice President for SMB (Small to Medium-Sized Business) and Consumer; from April 2004 to March 2005, he served as Executive Vice President of Partner Advocacy; from April 2001 to April 2004, he served as an Executive Vice President of Sales for EMEA, Latin America, and the North American Channel business; and from April 1998 to April 2001, he served as an Executive Vice President — Global Information and Administrative Services. Mr. Quinn joined the Company in December 1985.

Mr. Gnazzo has been Senior Vice President, Business Practices and Chief Compliance Officer of the Company since January 2005. From February 1993 through January 2005, he was Vice President, Business Practices and Chief Compliance Officer at United Technologies Corporation. Mr. Gnazzo joined the Company in January 2005.

Ms. O’Neill has been Senior Vice President and General Manager of CA Technology Services since April 2003. From April 2002 to April 2003, she served as Senior Vice President of Worldwide Pre-Sales and prior thereto served as a Vice President of Pre-Sales Consulting within Europe, the Middle East and Africa. Ms. O’Neill joined the Company in November 1994.

Mr. Nugent has been Chief Technology Officer since June 2006 and Senior Vice President and General Manager of our Enterprise Systems Management Business Unit since April 2005. From March 2002 to April 2005, he served as Senior Vice President and Chief Technology Officer of Novell, Inc., and from November 2000 to March 2002, he served as Executive Vice President, Chief Technology Officer and Chief Information Officer of Vectant, Inc., a subsidiary of the Marubeni Corporation, a provider of data and telecommunications services. Mr. Nugent joined the Company in April 2005.

Ms. Stravinskas has been Senior Vice President of the Company since October 2003 and Treasurer since May 2001. Ms. Stravinskas joined the Company in February 1986.

PART II


Item 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange. The following table sets forth, for the fiscal quarters indicated, the quarterly high and low closing sales prices on the New York Stock Exchange:


	Fiscal Year 2006				Fiscal Year 2005
	High		Low		High		Low

Fourth Quarter	$	29.36	$	26.75	$	30.82	$	26.42
Third Quarter	$	29.45	$	26.25	$	31.52	$	26.03
Second Quarter	$	29.37	$	26.24	$	27.67	$	22.61
First Quarter	$	29.28	$	26.80	$	29.17	$	25.30

On March 31, 2006, the closing price for our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange was $27.21. At March 31, 2006 we had approximately 12,037 stockholders of record.

We have paid cash dividends each year since July 1990. For fiscal year 2005, we paid a dividend of $0.08 per share. Beginning in fiscal year 2006 we increased our annual cash dividend to $0.16 per share, which has been paid out in quarterly installments of $0.04 per share as and when declared by the Board of Directors.

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer

The following table sets forth, for the months indicated, our purchases of common stock in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2006.


							Approximate
					Total Number		Dollar Value
					of Shares		of Shares that
					Purchased as		May Yet Be
	Total Number		Average		Part of Publicly		Purchased Under
	of Shares		Price Paid		Announced Plans		the Plans
Period	Purchased		per Share		or Programs		or Programs
	(in thousands, except average price paid per share)

January 2006		2,169	$	28.64		2,169	$	171,964
February 2006		2,348	$	27.23		2,348	$	107,978
March 2006		3,593	$	27.23		3,593	$	600,000

Total		8,110				8,110

Our corporate buyback program was originally announced in August 1990 (the 1990 Program) and has been subsequently amended by the Board of Directors from time to time to increase the number of shares of our common stock we have been authorized to repurchase. In April 2005, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $400 million in shares of Company stock during fiscal year 2006 (the Fiscal 2006 Program), subject to the share limits imposed under the 1990 Program. Repurchases during fiscal year 2006 through October 24, 2005 were made under the Fiscal 2006 Program. Effective October 25, 2005, the Board of Directors amended the Fiscal 2006 Program to authorize us to spend up to $600 million to repurchase shares of Company stock during fiscal year 2006, representing a $200 million increase in the amount previously authorized for expenditure in fiscal year 2006 for stock repurchases (the amended Fiscal 2006 Program). As part of the approval of the amended Fiscal 2006 Program, the Board of Directors terminated the 1990 Program and resolved that the Board of Directors would henceforth express its authorization to management to repurchase shares of Company stock only in dollars, and not in shares, as had been the case under the 1990 Program.

In March 2006, CA announced that its Board of Directors had authorized a $600 million common stock repurchase plan for its fiscal year 2007, beginning April 1, 2006. The plan called for quarterly common stock buybacks of $150 million, which were to be made in the open market or in private transactions.

On June 26, 2006, the Board of Directors authorized a new $2 billion common stock repurchase plan for fiscal year 2007 which will replace the prior $600 million common stock repurchase plan. Repurchases under the new plan will not be made until after the Company files its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006. Until the new plan is implemented, the Company will continue to repurchase shares under the prior program.


Item 6.	Selected Financial Data.

AS DESCRIBED IN THE EXPLANATORY NOTE AT THE BEGINNING OF THIS EXHIBIT, THE UNAUDITED FINANCIAL INFORMATION SET FORTH BELOW (PARTICULARLY WITH RESPECT TO REVENUE, DEFERRED SUBSCRIPTION VALUE TOTAL EXPENSE, NET INCOME, EARNINGS PER SHARE AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY) IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE DEPENDING ON THE FINDINGS OF OUR CURRENT REVIEW OF OPTION GRANT PRACTICES AND THE POTENTIAL RESTATEMENT OF OUR FINANCIAL STATEMENTS IN PRIOR PERIODS. REFER TO THE EXPLANATORY NOTE FOR IMPORTANT CAUTIONARY CONSIDERATIONS.

The information set forth below should be read in conjunction with Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”, included in this Exhibit.


	Year Ended March 31,
	2006		2005			2004			2003			2002
	(in millions, except per share amounts)

STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA
Revenue	$	3,776	$	3,560		$	3,320		$	3,057		$	2,910
Income (loss) from continuing operations(1)		136		(2	)		(81	)		(340	)		(1,158	)
Basic income (loss) from continuing operations		0.23		(0.01	)		(0.14	)		(0.60	)		(2.01	)
Diluted income (loss) from continuing operations		0.23		(0.01	)		(0.14	)		(0.60	)		(2.01	)
Dividends declared per common share		0.16		0.08			0.08			0.08			0.08


	March 31,
	2006			2005		2004		2003			2002
	(in millions)

BALANCE SHEET AND OTHER DATA
Cash provided by continuing operating activities	$	1,380		$	1,527	$	1,279	$	1,310		$	1,241
Working (deficit) capital(2)(3)		(771	)		112		642		(311	)		50
Total assets(3)		10,375			11,282		10,760		11,312			12,399
Deferred subscription value(4)		5,487			5,541		4,366		3,959			3,548
Long-term debt (less current maturities)		1,810			1,810		2,298		2,298			3,334
Stockholders’ equity		4,620			4,942		4,832		4,477			4,682


(1)		In fiscal year 2006, we incurred after-tax charges of approximately $54 million for restructuring and other costs and an after-tax benefit of approximately $5 million relating to the gain on the divestiture of assets that were contributed during the formation of Ingres Corp. We also incurred an after-tax charge of approximately $18 million for write-offs of in-process research and development costs due to our recent acquisitions. In fiscal year 2005, we incurred an after-tax charge of approximately $144 million related to the shareholder litigation and government investigation settlements, a tax expense charge of $55 million related to the planned repatriation of $500 million in cash under the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, and an after-tax charge of approximately $17 million for severance and other expenses in connection with a restructuring plan. Refer to “Shareholder Litigation and Government Investigation Settlement,” “Income Taxes,” and “Restructuring Charge” within Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” for additional information.

		Our adoption of SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” had the effect of prospectively eliminating the amortization of goodwill and certain other intangible assets beginning on April 1, 2002. Refer to Note 1, “Significant Accounting Policies — Goodwill”, in the Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated


		Financial Statements for additional information. We amortized goodwill and assembled workforce for fiscal year 2002 of $458 million.

(2)		Current liabilities include deferred subscription revenue (collected) — current of approximately $1.52 billion, $1.41 billion, $1.21 billion, $0.92 billion and $0.58 billion for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2006, 2005, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Also included in current liabilities is deferred maintenance revenue of approximately $0.25 billion, $0.27 billion, $0.29 billion, $0.32 billion, and $0.46 billion for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2006, 2005, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

(3)		Certain prior year balances have been reclassified to conform to the current year’s presentation. Refer to Note 1, “Significant Accounting Policies — Reclassifications”, in the Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

(4)		See Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”, for details.


Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

AS DESCRIBED IN THE EXPLANATORY NOTE AT THE BEGINNING OF THIS EXHIBIT, THE UNAUDITED FINANCIAL INFORMATION SET FORTH BELOW (PARTICULARLY WITH RESPECT TO REVENUE, DEFERRED SUBSCRIPTION VALUE TOTAL EXPENSE, NET INCOME, EARNINGS PER SHARE AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND TRENDS RELATING TO THESE ITEMS) IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE DEPENDING ON THE FINDINGS OF OUR CURRENT REVIEW OF OPTION GRANT PRACTICES AND THE POTENTIAL RESTATEMENT OF OUR FINANCIAL STATEMENTS IN PRIOR PERIODS. REFER TO THE EXPLANATORY NOTE FOR IMPORTANT CAUTIONARY CONSIDERATIONS.

Introduction

This “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” (MD&A) is intended to provide an understanding of our financial condition, change in financial condition, cash flow, liquidity, and results of operations.

Business Overview

We are one of the world’s largest providers of IT management software. Our software and expertise enables customers to better manage their complex IT infrastructures across systems and networks, security and storage solutions.

Our technology solutions are comprehensive, integrated, real-time and open. They are not tied to any one platform, but instead make it possible for customers to manage all of the computers, networks and other technologies that comprise their computing environments. In turn, this helps customers better manage the investments they have made in IT rather than having to “rip and replace” them. As a result, customers gain flexibility. They can manage risk, manage cost, increase service and better align their IT investments with the needs of their organization.

We pursue a number of high-growth areas with our products, including network and systems management, security and storage. Our solutions are designed for both mainframe and distributed environments, each of which comprise about half of our revenue.

The CA Business Model

As described in greater detail in Item 1, “Business,” of this Exhibit, we license our software products directly to customers as well as through distributors, resellers, and VARs. We generate revenue from the following sources: license fees — licensing our products on a right-to-use basis; maintenance fees — providing customer technical support and product enhancements; and service fees — providing professional services such as product implementation, consulting, and education services. The timing and amount of fees recognized as revenue during a reporting period are determined individually by license agreement, based on its duration and specific terms.

Under our business model, we provide customers with the flexibility to license software under month-to-month licenses or to fix their costs by committing to longer-term agreements. We also permit customers to change their

software mix as their business and technology needs change, which includes the right to receive software in the future within defined product lines for no additional fee, commonly referred to as unspecified future upgrades. As a result of the right our customers have to receive unspecified future upgrades, as well as maintenance included during the term of the license, we are required under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (GAAP) to recognize revenue from our license agreements evenly on a monthly basis (also known as ratably) over the license term. We believe recognizing license revenue ratably over the term of the license agreement more accurately reflects the earnings process; we also believe that it improves the predictability of our reported revenue streams. Under agreements entered into prior to October 2000 (the prior business model), and as is common practice in the software industry, we did not offer our customers the right to receive unspecified future upgrades. As a result, for most license agreements entered into prior to October 2000, we were required under GAAP to record the present value of the license agreement as revenue at the time the license agreement was signed.

Under our business model, the portion of the contract value that has not yet been recognized creates what we refer to as deferred subscription value. Deferred subscription value is recognized as revenue evenly on a monthly basis over the duration of the license agreements. When recognized, this revenue is reported on the “Subscription revenue” line item on our Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations. If a customer pays for software prior to the recognition of revenue, the amount deferred is reported as a liability entitled “Deferred subscription revenue (collected)” on our Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Not all of our active customer contracts have been transitioned to our business model, which has created what we refer to as a “Transition Period,” during which the license agreements under our prior business model come up for renewal. During this Transition Period, as customer license agreements under our prior business model are renewed under our business model, we are building deferred subscription value related to that customer, from which subscription revenue will be amortized in future periods. Total deferred subscription value, and the associated subscription revenue that comes out of it, may increase over time as we continue to renew customer contracts that were executed under the prior business model, transition acquired company contracts to our business model, sell additional products and capacity to existing customers, and enter into new contracts with new customers. The favorable impact on subscription revenue from the conversion of contracts from our old business model to our new business model will decrease over time as the transition is completed. The remaining balance of unbilled installment receivables that were previously recognized as revenue under our prior business model was $0.76 billion and $1.15 billion at March 31, 2006 and March 31, 2005, respectively.

While the impact of changing from up-front revenue recognition under our prior business model to our current business model resulted in the postponement of the recognition of amounts that previously would have been recognized earlier under the up-front model, we generally did not change our cost structure.

Under both the prior business model and our current business model, customers often pay for the right to use our software products over the term of the associated software license agreement. We refer to these payments as installment payments. While the transition to the current business model has changed the timing of revenue recognition, in most cases it has not changed the timing of how we bill and collect cash from customers. As a result, our cash generated from operations has generally not been affected by the transition to the current business model over the past several years; and we do not expect in the future any significant changes in our cash generated from operations as a result of this transition.

Significant Business Events

The Government Investigation

In fiscal year 2002, the United States Attorney’s Office for the Eastern Division of New York (USAO) and the staff of the Northeast Region of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) commenced an investigation concerning certain of our past accounting practices, including our revenue recognition procedures in periods prior to the adoption of our business model in October 2000.

In September 2004, we reached agreements with the USAO and the SEC by entering into a Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA) with the USAO and consenting to the entry of a Final Consent Judgment in a parallel proceeding brought by the SEC in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (the Federal Court). The

Federal Court approved the DPA on September 22, 2004 and entered the Final Consent Judgment on September 28, 2004. The agreements resolved the USAO and SEC investigations into certain of our past accounting practices, including our revenue recognition policies and procedures, and obstruction of their investigations.

Under the DPA, the Company has agreed to establish a $225 million fund for purposes of restitution to our current and former stockholders, with $75 million paid within 30 days of the date of approval of the DPA by the Court, $75 million to be paid within one year after the approval date and $75 million to be paid within 18 months after the approval date. The Company has made all three payments as of March 31, 2006. The Company has, among other things, taken the following actions: (1) added three new independent directors to the Board of Directors; (2) established a compliance committee of the Board of Directors by amending the charter of its Audit Committee and renaming it as the Audit and Compliance Committee; (3) appointed a Chief Compliance Officer and began implementation of an enhanced compliance and ethics program; (4) reorganized the Finance and Internal Audit Departments; (5) established an executive disclosure committee chaired by the Company’s chief executive officer; and (6) enhanced the Company’s Hotline (now Helpline) and issued the Company’s “Compliance and Helpline Policy.” We issued a report on our progress under the DPA and Final Consent Judgment in the proxy statement filed with the SEC in July 2005. We will report on further progress under the DPA in our 2006 proxy statement to be filed in or about July 2006.

On March 16, 2005, pursuant to the DPA and Final Consent Judgment, the United States District Court issued an order appointing attorney Lee S. Richards III, Esq., of Richards Spears Kibbe & Orbe LLP, to serve as Independent Examiner. The Independent Examiner is reviewing our compliance with the DPA and Final Consent Judgment and issued his six-month report concerning his recommendations regarding best practices on September 15, 2005. On December 15, 2005, March 15, 2006 and June 15, 2006 Mr. Richards issued his first three quarterly reports concerning the Company’s compliance with the DPA. Refer to Note 7, “Commitments and Contingencies”, in the Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information concerning the government investigation.

Internal Control Issues and Possible Extension of Independent Examiner’s Term of Appointment Under the DPA

As described elsewhere in this Exhibit, the Company is restating its financial results for the third quarter of fiscal year 2006 because it did not properly recognize its sales commission expense for the quarter then ended. In addition, the Company’s outside auditors determined that the Company did not properly calculate its taxes for certain non-routine tax matters in the fourth quarter and had to adjust them. As a result of these errors and other matters, the Company has identified three material weaknesses in its internal control over financial reporting, as described in Item 9A of this Exhibit.

Under the DPA, the Company is obligated, among other things, to take certain steps to improve internal controls and to reorganize its Finance Department. If the Company has not substantially implemented these and other required reforms for a period of at least two successive quarters before September 30, 2006, the USAO and the SEC may, in their discretion, extend the term of the Independent Examiner. In his Fourth Report dated June 15, 2006, the Independent Examiner expressed the view that, in light of the internal control issues described in Item 9A, including the fact that the Company has not yet hired a new chief financial officer, he is no longer able to conclude that the Company will be able to meet its obligation under the DPA to have improved internal controls and reorganized the Finance Department for two successive quarters prior to September 30, 2006. Consequently, the Company believes that the term of the Independent Examiner may be extended beyond September 30, 2006. Whether the USAO and the SEC will decide to extend the term or take any other action in connection with the DPA will be made by them in their discretion. The Company is continuing to review these matters to determine what further steps it should take to address the internal control issues referenced above.

Acquisitions and Divestitures

In March 2006, we acquired the common stock of Wily Technology, Inc. (Wily), a provider of enterprise application management solutions, for a total purchase price of approximately $374 million, or approximately $361 million net of acquired cash and marketable securities. Wily is a provider of enterprise application management software

solutions that enable companies to manage their web applications and infrastructure. The acquisition of Wily extends our application management offerings.

In December 2005, we acquired Control F-1 Corporation (Control F-1) for a total purchase price of approximately $14 million. Control F-1 was a privately held provider of support automation solutions that automatically prevent, detect and repair end-user computer problems before they disrupt critical IT services. CA markets the Control-F1 solutions as stand-alone products and has incorporated them into our portfolio of Business Service Optimization solutions, which help customers reduce costs, improve service levels, and better align IT with the business.

In December 2005, we sold our wholly-owned subsidiary MultiGen-Paradigm, Inc. (MultiGen) to Parallax Capital Partners. MultiGen was a provider of real-time, end-to-end 3D solutions for visualizations, simulations and training applications used for both civilian and government purposes. As a result of the sale, we recognized a gain on the disposal of $3 million, net of taxes, which is classified in discontinued operations on the Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations.

In November 2005, we announced an agreement with Garnett & Helfrich Capital, a private equity firm, to create an independent corporate entity, Ingres Corporation. We divested our Ingres open source database unit into Ingres Corporation, in which Garnett & Helfrich Capital is the majority shareholder. As a result of this transaction, we recorded a non-cash pre-tax gain of approximately $7 million in the third quarter of fiscal year 2006.

In October 2005, we completed the acquisition of iLumin Software Services, Inc. (iLumin), a privately held provider of enterprise message management and archiving software, for a total purchase price of approximately $48 million. iLumin’s Assentor product line has been added to our BrightStor solutions.

In July 2005, we acquired Niku Corporation (Niku), a provider of information technology management and governance solutions, for a total purchase price of approximately $345 million, or approximately $282 million net of acquired cash and marketable securities. Niku’s primary software product, Clarity IT-MG, is an integrated suite that spans and strengthens the IT governance offering of our Business Service Optimization business unit to the full IT life cycle, from investment selection, to execution and delivery of initiatives, to results assessment.

In June 2005, we acquired Concord Communications, Inc. (Concord), a provider of network service management software solutions, for a total purchase price of approximately $359 million, or approximately $283 million net of acquired cash and marketable securities. Concord is a provider of infrastructure software principally in the areas of network health, performance, and fault management. We have made Concord’s eHealth and Spectrum software available both as independent products and as integrated components of our Unicenter product portfolio in our Enterprise Systems Management business unit. In connection with the acquisition, we assumed $86 million in 3% convertible senior notes due 2023. In accordance with the notes’ terms, we redeemed (for cash) the notes in full in July 2005.

In November 2004, we completed the acquisition of Netegrity, Inc. (Netegrity), a provider of business security software solutions in the area of access and identity management, for a total purchase price of approximately $455 million, or approximately $358 million net of acquired cash and marketable securities. Netegrity was a provider of business security software, principally in the areas of identity and access management, and we have made Netegrity’s identity and access management solutions available both as independent products and as integrated components of our eTrust Identity and Access Management Suite in our Security Management business unit.

In August 2004, we acquired PestPatrol, Inc. (PestPatrol), a privately held provider of anti-spyware and security solutions, for a total purchase price of approximately $40 million. The products acquired in this transaction were integrated into our eTrust Threat Management software product portfolio in our Security Management business unit. This portfolio protects organizations from diverse Internet dangers such as viruses, spam, and inappropriate use of the Web by employees.

In March 2004, we sold our approximate 90% interest in ACCPAC International, Inc. (ACCPAC). ACCPAC provided accounting, customer relationship management, human resources, warehouse management, manufacturing, electronic data interchange, and point-of-sale software for small and medium-sized businesses. Our net proceeds totaled $104 million for all of our outstanding equity interests in ACCPAC, including options and change

of control payments for certain ACCPAC officers and managers. We received approximately $90 million of the net proceeds in fiscal year 2004 and the remainder in fiscal year 2005. As a result of the sale, we realized a gain, net of taxes, of approximately $60 million in fiscal year 2004. In the second quarter of fiscal year 2005, we recorded an adjustment to the gain of $2 million, net of tax, reducing the net gain to $58 million. The sale completed our multi-year effort to exit the business applications market.

Performance Indicators

Management uses several quantitative performance indicators to assess our financial results and condition. Each provides a measurement of the performance of our business model and how well we are executing our plan.

Our subscription-based business model is unique among our competitors in the software industry and particularly during the Transition Period it is difficult to compare our results for many of our performance indicators with those of our competitors. The following is a summary of the principal quantitative performance indicators that management uses to review performance:


										Percent
For the Year ended March 31,	2006			2005			Change			Change
	(in millions)

Subscription revenue	$	2,817		$	2,544		$	273			11	%
Total revenue	$	3,776		$	3,560		$	216			6	%
Subscription revenue as a percent of total revenue		75	%		72	%		3	%		N/A
Deferred subscription value	$	5,487		$	5,541		$	(54	)		(1	)%
New deferred subscription value (direct)	$	2,610		$	3,493		$	(883	)		(25	)%
New deferred subscription value (indirect)	$	195		$	144		$	51			35	%
Weighted average license agreement duration in years (direct)		3.03			3.10			(.07	)		(2	)%
Cash from continuing operating activities	$	1,380		$	1,527		$	(144	)		(9	)%
Income (loss) from continuing operations	$	136		$	(2	)	$	138			N/A


								Percent
As of March 31,	2006		2005		Change			Change
	(in millions)

Total cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities	$	1,865	$	3,125	$	(1,260	)		(40	)%
Total debt	$	1,811	$	2,636	$	(825	)		(31	)%

Analyses of our performance indicators, including general trends, can be found in the “Results of Operations” and “Liquidity and Capital Resources” sections of this MD&A. The performance indicators discussed below are those that we believe are unique because of our subscription-based business model.

Subscription Revenue — Subscription revenue is the ratable revenue recognized in a period from amounts previously recorded as deferred subscription value. If the weighted average life of our license agreements remains constant, an increase in deferred subscription value will result in an increase in subscription revenue.

Deferred Subscription Value — Under our business model, the portion of the license contract value that has not yet been earned creates what we refer to as deferred subscription value. As revenue is ratably recognized (evenly on a monthly basis), it is reported as “Subscription Revenue” on our Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations, and the deferred subscription value attributable to that contract is correspondingly reduced. When recognized as revenue, the amount is reported on the “Subscription revenue” line item in our Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations. If a customer pays for software prior to the recognition of revenue, the amount is reported as a liability entitled “Deferred subscription revenue (collected)” on our Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets. Customers do not always pay for software in equal annual installments over the life of a license agreement. The amount collected under a license agreement for the next twelve months but not yet recognized as revenue is reported as a liability entitled “Deferred subscription revenue (collected) — current” on our Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets. The amount paid under a license agreement for periods subsequent to the next twelve months, which will be recognized as revenue on a monthly basis only in those future years, is reported as a liability entitled “Deferred subscription revenue (collected) — noncurrent” on our Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets. The

increase or decrease in current payments attributable to periods subsequent to the next twelve months is reported as an operating activity entitled “Deferred subscription revenue (collected) — noncurrent” in our Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

Payments received in the current period that are attributable to later years of a license agreement have a positive impact in the current period on billings and cash provided by continuing operating activities. Accordingly, to the extent such payments are attributable to the later years of a license agreement, the license would provide a correspondingly reduced contribution to billings and cash from operating activities during the license’s later years.

New Deferred Subscription Value — New deferred subscription value represents the total incremental value (contract value) of software licenses sold in a period, which will be accounted for under our subscription model of revenue recognition. In the second quarter of fiscal year 2005, we began offering more flexible license terms to our channel partners’ end users, necessitating ratable recognition of revenue for the majority of our indirect business. Prior to July 1, 2004, such channel license revenue had been recorded up-front on a sell-through basis (when a distributor, reseller, or VAR sells the software product to its customers) and reported on the “Software fees and other” line item on the Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations. New deferred subscription value excludes the value associated with single-year maintenance-only license agreements, license-only indirect sales, and professional services arrangements and does not include that portion of bundled maintenance or unamortized discounts that are converted into subscription revenue upon renewal of prior business model contracts.

New deferred subscription value is what we expect to collect over time from our customers based upon contractual license agreements entered into during a reporting period. This amount is recognized as subscription revenue ratably over the applicable software license term. The license agreements that contribute to new deferred subscription value represent binding payment commitments by customers over periods generally up to three years. Our new deferred subscription value typically increases in each consecutive fiscal quarter, with the fourth quarter being the strongest. However, since new deferred subscription value is impacted by the volume and dollar amount of contracts coming up for renewal and the amount of early contract renewals, the change in new deferred subscription value, relative to previous periods, does not necessarily correlate to the change in billings or cash receipts, relative to previous periods. The contribution to current period revenue from new deferred subscription value from any single license agreement is relatively small, since revenue is recognized ratably over the applicable license agreement term.

Weighted Average License Agreement Duration in Years — The weighted average license agreement duration in years reflects the duration of all software licenses executed during a period, weighted to reflect the contract value of each individual software license. The weighted average duration is impacted by the volume and dollar amount of contracts coming up for renewal, and therefore may change from period to period and will not necessarily correlate to the prior year periods. The annual weighted average duration of 3.03 and 3.10 years for the fiscal years 2006 and 2005, respectively, were derived from the following quarterly new deferred subscription revenue amounts and quarterly weighted average durations in years from our direct business:


	Fiscal Year 2006				Fiscal Year 2005
	New Deferred		Weighted		New Deferred		Weighted
	Subscription		Average		Subscription		Average
	Value from		Duration		Value from		Duration in
	Direct Sales		in Years		Direct Sales		Years
	(in millions)

Fourth Quarter	$	969		2.89	$	1,469		3.40
Third Quarter		730		3.46		845		2.95
Second Quarter		575		2.92		649		2.90
First Quarter		336		2.70		530		2.75

	$	2,610		3.03	$	3,493		3.10

We believe license agreement durations averaging approximately three years increase the value customers receive from our software licenses by giving customers the flexibility to vary their software mix as their needs change. We also believe this flexibility improves our customer relationships and encourages greater accountability by us to each of our customers. The increase in the weighted average durations for contracts signed in the fourth quarter of fiscal

year 2005 and the third quarter of fiscal year 2006 is due to several individual longer-term contracts signed during those quarters (e.g., four to five years).

Results of Operations

Revenue

The following table presents the percentage of total revenue and the percentage of period-over-period dollar change for the revenue line items in our Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004. These comparisons of financial results are not necessarily indicative of future results.


	Fiscal Year 2006									Fiscal Year 2005
							Percentage									Percentage
							of									of
	Percentage of						Dollar			Percentage of						Dollar
	Total						Change			Total						Change
	Revenue						2006/			Revenue						2005/
	2006			2005			2005			2005			2004			2004

Revenue:
Subscription revenue		75	%		72	%		11	%		72	%		63	%		21	%
Maintenance		11	%		12	%		(3	)%		12	%		16	%		(15	)%
Software fees and other		4	%		7	%		(36	)%		7	%		10	%		(23	)%
Financing fees		1	%		2	%		(42	)%		2	%		4	%		(43	)%
Professional services		9	%		7	%		32	%		7	%		7	%		4	%
Total revenue		100	%		100	%		6	%		100	%		100	%		7	%

Total Revenue

Total revenue for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 increased $216 million from the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005, to $3.78 billion. This increase was partially a result of the transition to our business model, which contributed additional subscription revenue from the prior fiscal year as we continue to add incremental subscription revenue for contracts that are renewals of prior business model contracts for which revenue was previously recognized up-front for multiple year licenses under our old business model. The increase in total revenue was also partially attributable to the sales of Concord, Niku, iLumin, and Wily products, which contributed approximately $125 million of separately identifiable revenue. It is expected that software fees and other revenue and maintenance revenue attributable to acquisitions will decline as these acquired products transition to our business model and revenue attributable to these acquired products is reported as subscription revenue. In addition, revenue for fiscal year 2006 was negatively impacted by fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates by approximately $17 million compared with fiscal year 2005. Total revenue in fiscal year 2006 as compared with fiscal year 2005 was negatively impacted by decreases in maintenance and financing fees resulting from how these items are accounted for under our business model. The recognition of maintenance and financing fees under our business model is discussed further under “Subscription Revenue” in this MD&A. Our revenue was further negatively impacted by the fact that since the beginning of the second quarter of fiscal year 2005, revenue from certain contracts in our channel business has been, and continues to be, recorded as new deferred subscription value, which will be ratably recognized into subscription revenue in future periods compared to prior periods when the majority of such revenue was recognized on an up-front basis.

Total revenue for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005 increased $240 million from the fiscal year ended March 31, 2004, to $3.56 billion. This increase was partially a result of the transition to our business model, which contributed additional subscription revenue from the prior fiscal year. The increase in total revenue was also partially attributable to the sales of Netegrity products which contributed approximately $32 million of revenue in the second half of fiscal year 2005. In addition, as our international contracts are denominated in local currencies, the strengthening of both the euro and the British pound, as well as certain other currencies, against the U.S. dollar increased our revenue by approximately $103 million.

Subscription Revenue

Subscription revenue represents the portion of revenue ratably recognized on software license agreements entered into under our business model. Some of the licenses recorded between October 2000, when our business model was implemented, and the end of fiscal year 2006 continued to contribute to subscription revenue on a monthly, ratable basis. As a result, subscription revenue for fiscal year 2006 includes ratably recognized revenue from contracts recorded in fiscal year 2006, as well as contracts recorded between October 2000 and the end of fiscal year 2005, depending on contract length.

Subscription revenue for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 increased $273 million from fiscal year 2005, to $2.82 billion. This increase was predominantly due to a $118 million increase in ratably recognized revenue from the indirect business plus the increase in subscription revenue as a result of renewals of contracts whose revenue was previously recognized on an up-front basis or as part of maintenance fees under our prior business model.

For the fiscal years ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, we added new deferred subscription value related to our direct business of $2.61 billion and $3.49 billion, respectively. The $0.88 billion decrease in fiscal year 2006 as compared to fiscal year 2005 in new deferred subscription value was primarily due to the decrease in early contract renewals resulting from the transition away from a total bookings based compensation structure. In addition, CA signed contract extensions with two customers in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2005 that added approximately $390 million in aggregate to new deferred subscription value in the period. We also recorded $195 million of new deferred subscription value for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 related to our indirect business, which increased 35% from the $144 million added in the prior fiscal year.

Licenses executed under our business model for our direct business had weighted average durations of 3.03 years and 3.10 years, for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Annualized new deferred subscription value represents the total value of all new software license agreements entered into during a period divided by the weighted average life of all such license agreements recorded during the same period. The annualized new deferred subscription value for the subscriptions booked in the direct business during the fiscal year 2006 decreased approximately $266 million, or 24% from the comparable prior fiscal year to approximately $861 million.

Subscription revenue for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005 increased $443 million from fiscal year 2004, to $2.54 billion. For the fiscal years ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, we added new deferred subscription value related to our direct business of $3.49 billion and $2.29 billion, respectively. Licenses executed under our business model in the years ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 had weighted average durations of 3.1 and 2.8 years, respectively. Annualized deferred subscription value related to our direct business increased approximately $301 million, or 36%, for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005 over the comparable prior fiscal year to $1.13 billion. In addition, we recorded $144 million of new deferred subscription value for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005 related to our indirect business. Subscription revenue was further increased as a result of renewals of contracts whose revenue was previously recognized on an up-front basis or as part of maintenance fees under our prior business model.

Under the prior business model, maintenance revenue was separately identified and was reported on the “Maintenance” line item on the Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations. Under our business model, maintenance that is bundled with product sales is not separately identified in our customers’ license agreements and therefore is included within the “Subscription revenue” line item on the Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations. Under the prior business model, financing revenue was also separately identified on the Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations. Under our business model, financing fees are no longer applicable and the entire contract value is now recognized as subscription revenue over the term of the contract. The quantification of the impact that each of these factors had on the increase in subscription revenue is not determinable.

Maintenance

Maintenance revenue for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 decreased $11 million, or 3%, from the comparable prior year to $430 million. This decrease in maintenance revenue is a result of our transition to, and increased number of license agreements under, our business model, where maintenance revenue is bundled along with license revenue, and is reported on the “Subscription revenue” line item on the Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations. The combined maintenance and license revenue on these types of license agreements is recognized

ratably on a monthly basis over the term of the agreement under our business model. We cannot quantify the impact that our transition to the new business model had on maintenance revenue since maintenance bundled with software licenses under our business model is not separately identifiable. Maintenance revenue from our indirect business declined $5 million from the comparable prior period to $54 million. Partially offsetting these declines was an increase of $49 million associated with acquisitions completed prior to March 31, 2006.

Maintenance revenue for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005 decreased $79 million, or 15% from the prior year predominantly due to the transition of maintenance-only licenses to subscription licenses, partially offset by a $36 million increase in maintenance revenue from the indirect business from the comparable prior period to $59 million.

Software Fees and Other

Software fees and other revenue consist of revenue related to distribution and OEM channel partners (sometimes referred to as our “indirect” or “channel” revenue) that has been recorded on an up-front sell-through basis, revenue associated with acquisitions prior to the transition to our business model, revenue from joint ventures, royalty revenues and other revenue. Revenue related to acquisitions is initially recorded on the acquired company’s systems generally under a perpetual or up-front model, and is typically converted to our ratable model within the first fiscal year after the acquisition. As these contracts are renewed under our business model, revenue is recognized ratably on a monthly basis over the term of the agreement.

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006, software fees and other revenue decreased $91 million from the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005, to $163 million. This reduction is due to a $53 million decrease in prior business model revenue, as ratable revenue from new business model contracts was recorded as subscription revenue on the Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations. Additionally, we experienced a decrease in indirect revenue associated with the transition to our subscription model in July 2004 which represented a $50 million reduction from the prior year as more revenue was deferred as these indirect contracts were renewed. These decreases were offset by other revenue increases of approximately $12 million.

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005, software fees and other revenue decreased $77 million from the fiscal year ended March 31, 2004, to $254 million. This reduction is due to the decrease in indirect revenue associated with the transition to our subscription model in July 2004 which represented a $128 million reduction from the prior year as more revenues were deferred as the contracts were renewed. These decreases were partially offset by approximately $21 million of license revenue associated with the sale of Netegrity products, an approximate $10 million benefit associated with the resolution of a prior business model contract dispute in the second quarter of fiscal year 2005 and approximately $20 million due to other activities.

Financing Fees

Financing fees result from the initial discounting to present value of product sales with extended payment terms under the prior business model, which required up-front revenue recognition. This discount initially reduced the related installment accounts receivable and is referred to as “Unamortized discounts.” The related unamortized discount is amortized over the life of the applicable license agreement and is reported as financing fees. Under our business model, additional unamortized discounts are no longer recorded, since we no longer recognize revenue on an up-front basis for sales of products with extended payment terms. As expected, for fiscal years 2006 and 2005, financing fees continued to decline, reflecting a decrease of $32 million and $57 million, respectively, from the prior fiscal years to $45 million and $77 million, respectively. The decrease in financing fee revenue for both years is attributable to the discontinuance of offering license agreements under the prior business model and is expected to decline to zero over the next several years.

Professional Services

Professional services revenue for fiscal year 2006 increased $77 million from fiscal year 2005 to $321 million. The increase was primarily attributable to growth in professional service engagements relating to acquired companies of $23 million, growth in security software which utilize our Access Control and Identity Management solutions, growth in our IT Service and Asset Management engagements and project and portfolio management services.

Professional services revenue for fiscal year 2005 increased $10 million from fiscal year 2004 to $244 million. The increase was primarily attributable to growth in security software engagements, which utilize Access Control and Identity Management solutions, as well as growth in IT Service and Asset Management solutions. The increase was also partially attributable to approximately $4 million of services revenue associated with the sale of Netegrity products. This increase in services revenue was limited due to an increase in services sold in combination with related software products of approximately $14 million, which requires that such services revenue be recognized ratably over the life of the related software contract period.

Total Revenue by Geography

The following table presents the amount of revenue earned from sales to unaffiliated customers in the United States and international regions and corresponding percentage changes for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004. These comparisons of financial results are not necessarily indicative of future results.


	Fiscal Year 2006											Fiscal Year 2005
	2006		%		2005		%		Change			2005		%		2004		%		Change
	(in millions)

United States	$	1,992		53	$	1,838		52		8	%	$	1,838		52	$	1,755		53		5	%
International		1,784		47		1,722		48		4	%		1,722		48		1,565		47		10	%

	$	3,776		100	$	3,560		100		6	%	$	3,560		100	$	3,320		100		7	%

International revenue increased $62 million, or 4%, in fiscal year 2006 as compared with fiscal year 2005, primarily due to increased new deferred subscription value in prior periods associated with our European business partially offset by an unfavorable foreign exchange impact of approximately $17 million. The increase in revenue from the United States was primarily attributable to sales of products related to companies acquired during the fiscal year 2006, an increase in new deferred subscription value in prior periods as well as an increase in professional services revenue, partially offset by decreases in revenue from maintenance, finance fees and software fees and other revenues.

International revenue increased $157 million, or 10%, in fiscal year 2005 as compared with fiscal year 2004. The increase in international revenue was primarily attributable to a positive impact to revenue from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates of approximately $103 million for fiscal year 2005 over fiscal year 2004. The increase in foreign currency exchange is primarily associated with the strengthening of both the euro and the British pound versus the U.S. dollar. The increase was also a result of an increase in contract bookings in prior periods associated with our European business. The increase in revenue from the United States was primarily attributable to an increase in contract booking in prior periods as well as an increase in professional services revenue. The increase was partially offset by decreases in revenue from maintenance, finance fees and software fees and other revenues.

Price changes and inflation did not have a material impact in fiscal years 2006, 2005 or 2004.

Expenses

The following table presents expenses as a percentage of total revenue and the percentage of period-over-period dollar change for the expense line items in our Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004. These comparisons of financial results are not necessarily indicative of future results.


	Fiscal Year 2006									Fiscal Year 2005
							Percentage									Percentage
							of									of
	Percentage of						Dollar			Percentage of						Dollar
	Total						Change			Total						Change
	Revenue						2006/			Revenue						2005/
	2006			2005			2005			2005			2004			2004

Operating expenses:
Amortization of capitalized software costs		12	%		13	%		—			13	%		14	%		(3	)%
Cost of professional services		7	%		6	%		19	%		6	%		7	%		2	%


	Fiscal Year 2006									Fiscal Year 2005
							Percentage									Percentage
							of									of
	Percentage of						Dollar			Percentage of						Dollar
	Total						Change			Total						Change
	Revenue						2006/			Revenue						2005/
	2006			2005			2005			2005			2004			2004

Selling, general, and administrative		42	%		38	%		18	%		38	%		39	%		4	%
Product development and enhancements		18	%		20	%		(1	)%		20	%		21	%		2	%
Commissions, royalties and bonuses		10	%		10	%		14	%		10	%		8	%		27	%
Depreciation and amortization of other intangible assets		4	%		4	%		3	%		4	%		4	%		(3	)%
Other gains/expenses, net		—			—			—			—			2	%		N/A
Restructuring and other		2	%		1	%		214	%		1	%		—			N/A
Charge for in-process research and development costs		—			—			—			—			—			—
Shareholder litigation and government investigation settlements		—			7	%		—	%		7	%		5	%		39	%
Total operating expenses		96	%		97	%		5	%		97	%		99	%		5	%
Interest expense, net		1	%		3	%		(61	)%		3	%		4	%		(9	)%

Note — Amounts may not add to their respective totals due to rounding.

Amortization of Capitalized Software Costs

Amortization of capitalized software costs consists of the amortization of both purchased software and internally generated capitalized software development costs. Internally generated capitalized software development costs are related to new products and significant enhancements to existing software products that have reached the technological feasibility stage. Amortization of capitalized software costs for fiscal years 2006 and 2005 increased $2 million and decreased $16 million, respectively, from the prior fiscal years to $449 million and $447 million, respectively. The increase in 2006 was predominately due to the Company’s current year acquisitions. The decrease in 2005 was primarily due to certain purchased software assets becoming fully amortized in 2005. We recorded amortization of purchased software products for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004 of $401 million, $406 million, and $423 million, respectively. We recorded amortization of internally generated capitalized software development costs for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004 of $48 million, $41 million, and $40 million, respectively.

Cost of Professional Services

Cost of professional services consists primarily of the personnel-related costs associated with providing professional services and training to customers. Cost of professional services for fiscal year 2006 increased $43 million from fiscal year 2005 to $272 million, mostly due to increased sales of professional services. The improvement in professional services gross margin from 6% in fiscal year 2005 to 15% in fiscal year 2006 is attributable to a more effective utilization of professional staff and increased professional services revenue.

Cost of professional services for fiscal year 2005 increased $5 million from fiscal year 2004 to $229 million mostly due to increased revenue volume, partially offset by approximately $12 million of costs required to be deferred because they were sold in combination with related software products, which requires that the total estimated cost of such services be deferred and recognized ratably over the life of the related software contract period.

Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A)

SG&A expenses for fiscal year 2006 increased $247 million from fiscal year 2005 to $1.59 billion. The increase was primarily attributable to employee and other costs associated with the Concord, Niku, iLumin, and Wily

acquisitions of approximately $98 million, increased travel, training and relocation costs of approximately $39 million, increased consulting costs of approximately $55 million related to our ERP implementation, legal fees, Sarbanes-Oxley compliance programs, and increased marketing and promotion costs of approximately $35 million mostly due to our new branding campaign and channel promotions. Partly offsetting these increases was a reduction of $15 million associated with the Company’s decision in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2006 to forego its discretionary contribution to the Company-sponsored 401(k) plan. Through the third quarter of fiscal year 2006, the Company had accrued $12 million, all of which was reversed in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2006, resulting in a $12 million reduction to SG&A expense in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2006. SG&A expenses for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 included approximately $62 million and $53 million of stock-based compensation expense, respectively. SG&A expenses for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 included credits to the provision for doubtful accounts of approximately $18 million and $25 million, respectively. The credit in the provision for doubtful accounts is a result of the reduction in the prior business model accounts receivable. Under our business model, amounts due from customers are offset by related deferred subscription revenue, resulting in little or no carrying value on the balance sheet. In addition, under our business model, customer payments are often received in advance of revenue recognition, which results in a reduced net credit exposure. Each of these items reduces the need to provide for estimated bad debts.

SG&A expenses for fiscal year 2005 increased $46 million from fiscal year 2004 to $1.35 billion. The increase was primarily attributable to an increase in personnel related costs. SG&A expenses for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 included approximately $53 million and $59 million, respectively, of stock-based compensation expense. In addition, in fiscal year 2005 we recorded a credit of approximately $25 million against the provision of doubtful accounts, which is lower than the credit of $53 million we recorded in fiscal year 2004. SG&A for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 also included approximately $24 million and $30 million, respectively, of legal expenses related to the government investigation and, for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005, included $31 million for consulting and other fees associated with our Sarbanes-Oxley compliance program. Further, in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2005, we realized a gain of approximately $8 million on the sale of an investment that was included in SG&A.

Product Development and Enhancements

For fiscal year 2006, product development and enhancement expenditures, which include product support, decreased $8 million compared to fiscal year 2005 to $696 million. Product development and enhancement expenditures were approximately 18% and 20% of total revenue for fiscal years ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. During fiscal year 2006, we continued to focus on and invest in product development and enhancements for emerging technologies such as wireless, Web services and on-demand computing, as well as a broadening of our enterprise product offerings.

Product development and enhancement expenditures for fiscal year 2005 increased $11 million from fiscal year 2004 to $704 million. Product development and enhancement expenditures were approximately 20% and 21% of total revenue for fiscal years ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

Commissions, Royalties and Bonuses

Commissions, royalties and bonuses for fiscal year 2006 increased $48 million from fiscal year 2005 to $387 million. Sales commission expense increased approximately $31 million over the prior year, and was approximately $70 million more than the Company had anticipated at the outset of the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2006. The increase was primarily due to a new sales commission plan for fiscal year 2006 that did not appropriately align commission payments with our overall performance. The impact of the higher sales commission expense was partially offset by lower bonus expenses in fiscal year 2006 as compared to fiscal year 2005 of approximately $8 million, primarily due to the reductions in our variable compensation programs, including management bonuses. Through the third quarter of fiscal year 2006, the Company had accrued approximately $26 million in annual bonus expense, of which approximately $10 million was reversed in the fourth quarter of 2006. We are restating our third quarter results and have identified a material weakness in financial controls as they pertained to the fiscal year 2006 commissions plan. Refer to Part 1, Item 9A, “Controls and Procedures” for additional information concerning the evaluation of the Company’s internal control processes over the recognition of commission expense. Royalties also

increased over the prior year by approximately $25 million primarily due to an increased level of royalties associated with recent acquisitions, royalties associated with the newly formed Ingres Corporation as well as higher sales of certain royalty bearing channel products.

Commissions, royalties and bonuses for fiscal year 2005 increased $72 million from fiscal year 2004 to $339 million. The increase was primarily due to the increase in new deferred subscription value recorded in fiscal year 2005, on which sales commissions were based, as compared with fiscal year 2004.

Depreciation and Amortization of Other Intangible Assets

Depreciation and amortization of other intangible assets for fiscal year 2006 increased $4 million from fiscal year 2005 to $134 million. The increase in depreciation and amortization of other intangible assets was a result of certain intangible assets acquired during the year, resulting from recent acquisitions.

Depreciation and amortization of other intangible assets for fiscal year 2005 decreased $4 million from fiscal year 2004 to $130 million. The decrease in depreciation and amortization of other intangible assets was a result of certain intangible assets from past acquisitions becoming fully amortized.

Other (Gains)/Expenses, Net

Gains and losses attributable to divestitures of fixed assets, certain foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, and certain other infrequent events have been included in the “Other (gains)/expenses, net” line item on the Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations. The components of “Other (gains)/expenses, net” are as follows:


	Year Ended March 31,
	2006			2005			2004
	(in millions)

Gains attributable to divestitures of fixed assets	$	(7	)	$	—		$	(19	)
Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates		(9	)		8			41
(Gains) expenses attributable to legal settlements		1			(13	)		26
Impairment of capitalized software		—			—			4

Total	$	(15	)	$	(5	)	$	52

Restructuring and Other

In the second quarter of fiscal year 2006, we announced a restructuring plan designed to more closely align our investments with strategic growth opportunities, including a workforce reduction of approximately 5% or 800 positions worldwide. The plan is expected to yield about $75 million in savings on an annualized basis, once the reductions are fully implemented. We anticipate the total restructuring plan will cost up to $85 million. As of March 31, 2006, we have incurred approximately $66 million of expenses under the plan of which $45 million of these expenses remain unpaid at March 31, 2006. The remaining liability balance is included in “Accrued expenses and other current liabilities” on the Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets. Final payment of these amounts is dependent upon settlement with the works councils in certain international locations and our ability to negotiate lease terminations.

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006, we incurred approximately $15 million in connection with certain DPA related costs and the termination of a non-core application development professional services project (see also Note 7, “Commitments and Contingencies”, in the Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements) and other expenses. In addition, as part of its restructuring initiatives and associated review of the benefits of owning versus leasing certain properties, the Company also entered into three sale/leaseback transactions during the second half of fiscal year 2006. Two of these transactions resulted in a loss totaling approximately $7 million which was recorded under “Restructuring and other” in the Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations. The third sale/leaseback transaction resulted in a gain of approximately $5 million which is being recognized ratably as a reduction to rent expense over the life of the lease term.

In the second quarter of fiscal year 2005, we announced a restructuring plan that was designed to more closely align our investments with strategic growth opportunities. The restructuring plan included a workforce reduction of approximately 5% or 750 positions worldwide, slightly lower than our original estimate of 800 positions. As of March 31, 2005, the Company had made all payments under the plan.

Shareholder Litigation and Government Investigation Settlement

In prior fiscal years, a number of stockholder class action lawsuits were initiated that alleged, among other things, that the Company made misleading statements of material fact or omitted to state material facts necessary in order to make the statements, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading in connection with the Company’s financial performance. Refer to Note 7, “Commitments and Contingencies”, in the Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information concerning the shareholder litigation.

In August 2003, we announced the settlement of all outstanding litigation related to these actions. Under the settlement, we agreed to issue a total of up to 5.7 million shares of common stock to the shareholders represented in the three class action lawsuits, including payment of attorneys’ fees. In January 2004, approximately 1.6 million settlement shares were issued along with approximately $3.3 million to the plaintiffs’ attorneys for attorney fees and related expenses. In March 2004, approximately 0.2 million settlement shares were issued to participants and beneficiaries of the CASH Plan. On October 8, 2004, the Federal Court signed an order approving the distribution of the remaining 3.8 million settlement shares, less administrative expenses. All the remaining shareholder litigation settlement shares were issued in December 2004. Of the 3.8 million settlement shares, approximately 51,000 were used for the payment of administrative expenses in connection with the settlement, approximately 76,000 were liquidated for cash distributions to class members entitled to receive a cash distribution, and the remaining settlement shares were distributed to class members entitled to receive a distribution of shares.

The final shareholder litigation settlement value of approximately $174 million was calculated using the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) closing price of our common stock on December 14, 2004, the date the settlement shares were issued, and also included certain administrative costs associated with the settlement. An initial estimate for the value of the shareholder litigation settlement was established on August 22, 2003. The chart below summarizes the NYSE closing price of our common stock and the estimated value of the shareholder litigation settlement since the initial estimate was established.


			Shareholder
	NYSE Closing		Litigation Settlement
	Stock Price		Estimated Value
			(in millions)

December 14, 2004	$	31.03	$	174
September 30, 2004		26.30		156
June 30, 2004		28.06		163
March 31, 2004		26.86		158
December 31, 2003		27.34		158
September 30, 2003		26.11		150
August 22, 2003		25.00		144

The shareholder litigation settlement expense for fiscal year 2005 of $16 million was a result of the increase in our stock price since March 31, 2004. The aggregate shareholder litigation settlement expense recorded was $174 million, including $158 million in fiscal year 2004. Refer to Note 7, “Commitments and Contingencies”, in the Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

In September 2004, we reached agreements with the USAO and the SEC in connection with their investigations of improper recognition of revenue and related reporting practices during the period January 1, 1998 through September 30, 2000, and the actions of certain former employees to impede the investigations. Under the DPA, we agreed, among other things, to establish a restitution fund of $225 million to compensate present and former Company shareholders for losses caused by the misconduct of certain former Company executives. In connection with the DPA, we recorded a $10 million charge in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2004 and $218 million in the second quarter of fiscal year 2005 associated with the establishment of the shareholder restitution fund and related

administrative fees. The first payment of $75 million was made during the third quarter of fiscal year 2005. The second payment of $75 million was made in the second quarter of fiscal year 2006 and the final payment of $75 million was made in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2006. Refer to Note 7, “Commitments and Contingencies”, in the Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

Interest Expense, Net

Interest expense, net for fiscal year 2006 decreased $65 million as compared to fiscal year 2005 to $41 million. The change was primarily due to a decrease in average debt outstanding which resulted in a $39 million decrease in interest expense, and a decrease in the average interest rate on our outstanding debt, which resulted in a $20 million decrease in interest expense. The decrease was also due to an increase in our average cash balance and an increase in interest rates on the cash balance during the fiscal year ended 2006 as compared to the fiscal year ended 2005, which resulted in an increase in interest income of approximately $6 million. Refer to the “Liquidity and Capital Resources” section of this MD&A and Note 6, “Debt”, in the Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements, for additional information.

Interest expense, net for fiscal year 2005 decreased $11 million as compared to fiscal year 2004 to $106 million. The decrease was primarily due to an increase in our average cash balance during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005 as compared to the fiscal year ended March 31, 2004, which resulted in an increase in interest income of approximately $28 million. The decrease in interest expense was partially reduced by additional interest expense of $8 million incurred as a result of the issuance of the 2005 Senior Notes and an increase in the weighted average interest rate, which resulted in a $9 million increase in interest expense.

Operating Margins

Fiscal year 2006 pretax operating income from continuing operations was $113 million as compared to $2 million in fiscal year 2005. This improvement relates primarily to revenue growth as a result of our acquisitions, and $234 million in shareholder litigation and government investigation costs in fiscal year 2005 that did not recur in fiscal year 2006, partially offset by higher restructuring costs and higher selling, general and administrative costs and commission expenses incurred in fiscal year 2006 compared to fiscal year 2005.

Income Taxes

Our effective tax rate from continuing operations was approximately (20%), 200%, and 17% for fiscal years 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively. Refer to Note 8, “Income Taxes”, in the Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

The income tax benefit recorded for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 includes benefits of approximately $51 million arising from the recognition of certain foreign tax credits, $18 million arising from international stock based compensation deductions and $66 million arising from foreign export benefits and other international tax rate benefits. Partially offsetting these benefits was a charge of approximately $60 million related to additional tax reserves.

During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2006, we repatriated approximately $584 million from foreign subsidiaries. Total taxes related to the repatriation were approximately $55 million. The repatriation was initially planned in fiscal year 2005 in response to the favorable tax benefits afforded by the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (AJCA), which introduced a special one-time dividends received deduction on the repatriation of certain foreign earnings to a U.S. taxpayer, provided that certain criteria were met. During fiscal year 2005, we recorded an estimate of this tax charge of $55 million based on an estimated repatriation amount up to $500 million. In the first quarter of fiscal year 2006, we recorded a benefit of approximately $36 million reflecting the Department of Treasury and Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Notice 2005-38 issued on May 10, 2005. In the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2006, the Company finalized its estimates of tax liabilities and determined that an adjustment was necessary and, accordingly, recorded an additional tax charge in the amount of $36 million. As a result of this complex tax matter, the Company has identified a material weakness in its internal controls over documenting and communicating tax planning strategies. See Item 9A, “Controls and Procedures” for additional information.

The income tax expense for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005 includes a charge of $55 million reflecting the Company’s original estimated cost of repatriating approximately $500 million under the AJCA which was partially offset by a $26 million tax benefit attributable to a refund claim originally made for additional tax benefits associated with prior fiscal years. We received a letter from the IRS approving the claim for this refund in September 2004.

Selected Quarterly Information

Quarterly Restatement for Commissions Expense

In May 2006 the Company announced that it would restate its earnings for the third quarter of fiscal year 2006, because of material errors in the Company’s estimate of commission expense for the three and nine month periods ended December 31, 2005. The Company’s fiscal year 2006 sales commission plan, which was new for 2006, was designed to compensate individuals for increases in sales of new products as well as billings to customers. The 2006 plan was complex and contained provisions based on cumulative performance which increased the difficulty of estimating commission expense. In January, 2006, sales and finance management reached an understanding that certain actions would be taken based on the discretion built into the 2006 plan to reduce amounts otherwise expected to be paid to sales employees pursuant to the plan. However, sales and finance management did not document their understanding regarding the planned changes and did not follow up to ensure the changes were implemented.

Accordingly, the Company has determined that approximately $31 million, or $0.03 per share, of additional commission cost should have been recognized in the third quarter of fiscal year 2006. This restatement does not affect previously reported third quarter total revenue and cash flow from operations or financial results for the full fiscal year. Refer to Part I, Item 9A, “Controls and Procedures”, for additional information.

Selected Financial Data

(in millions, except per share data)


	Nine Months Ended
	December 31, 2005
	Previously
	Reported(1)		Restated(2)

Statement of Operations:
Commissions, royalties and bonuses	$	217	$	248
Total expenses before interest and taxes		2,604		2,635
Income from continuing operations before interest and taxes		225		194
Income from continuing operations before income taxes		194		163
Income from continuing operations		191		172
Net income		194		175
Basic income from continuing operations per share		0.32		0.29
Basic net income per share		0.33		0.30
Diluted income from continuing operations per share		0.31		0.28
Diluted net income per share		0.32		0.29


	December 31, 2005
	Previously
	Reported(1)		Restated(2)

Balance Sheet:
Current Liabilities:
Salaries, wages, and commissions	$	214	$	245
Federal, state, and foreign income taxes payable		105		93
Total current liabilities		2,765		2,784
Total liabilities		5,180		5.199
Stockholders’ Equity:
Retained earnings		1,961		1,942
Total stockholders’ equity		4,877		4,858


	Nine Months Ended
	December 31, 2005
	Previously
	Reported(1)		Restated(2)

Statement of Cash Flow:
Net income	$	194	$	175
Increase in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other		110		141
Increase in taxes payable		82		70
Net cash provided by operating activities		814		814


	Three Months Ended
	December 31, 2005
	Previously
	Reported(1)		Restated(2)

Statement of Operations:
Commissions, royalties and bonuses	$	87	$	118
Total expenses before interest and taxes		887		918
Income from continuing operations before interest and taxes		80		49
Income from continuing operations before income taxes		68		37
Income from continuing operations		56		37
Net income		59		40
Basic income from continuing operations per share		0.09		0.06
Basic net income per share		0.10		0.07
Diluted income from continuing operations per share		0.09		0.06
Diluted net income per share		0.09		0.06


(1)		As presented in the Company’s Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2005, filed on February 9, 2006.
(2)		Adjusted to reflect the restatement described in the paragraph above.


	June 30(1)			Sept. 30(2)			Dec. 31(3)			Mar. 31(4)			Total
	(Restated)
	(in millions, except per share amounts)

2006 Quarterly Results
Revenue	$	920		$	942		$	967		$	947		$	3,776
Percent of annual revenue		24	%		25	%		26	%		25	%		100	%
Income (loss) from continuing operations	$	94		$	41		$	37		$	(36	)	$	136
Basic income (loss) from continuing operations per share	$	0.16		$	0.07		$	0.06		$	(0.06	)	$	0.23
Diluted income (loss) from continuing operations per share	$	0.15		$	0.07		$	0.06		$	(0.06	)	$	0.23


	June 30			Sept. 30(5)			Dec. 31(6)			Mar. 31(7)			Total
	(in millions, except per share amounts)

2005 Quarterly Results
Revenue	$	861		$	865		$	917		$	917		$	3,560
Percent of annual revenue		24	%		24	%		26	%		26	%		100	%
Income (loss) income from continuing operations	$	47		$	(96	)	$	31		$	16		$	(2	)
Basic income (loss) from continuing operations per share	$	0.08		$	(0.17	)	$	0.05		$	0.03		$	(0.01	)
Diluted income (loss) from continuing operations per share	$	0.08		$	(0.17	)	$	0.05		$	0.03		$	(0.01	)


(1)		Includes a tax benefit of approximately $36 million reflecting the Department of Treasury and Internal Revenue Service Notice 2005-38, which permitted the utilization of additional foreign tax credits to reduce the


		estimated taxes associated with cash repatriation (Refer to “Income Taxes” within Results of Operations). Also includes a charge of approximately $4 million related to the write-off of in-process research and development costs in relation to the acquisition of Concord (refer to Note 2, Acquisitions, Divestitures and Restructuring, in the Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements) and an after-tax credit of approximately $2 million related to a reduction in the allowance for doubtful accounts (refer to Note 5, “Trade and Installment Accounts Receivable”, in the Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements).

(2)		Includes an after-tax charge of approximately $14 million related to the write-off of in-process research and development costs in relation to the acquisition of Niku (refer to Note 2, Acquisitions, Divestitures and Restructuring, in the Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements), an after-tax charge of approximately $6 million in connection with certain DPA related costs and the termination of a non-core application development professional services project, an after-tax charge of approximately $23 million for severance and other expenses in connection with a restructuring plan (refer to “Shareholder Litigation and Government Investigation Settlement” and “Restructuring Charge” within Results of Operations), and an after-tax credit of approximately $6 million related to a reduction in the allowance for doubtful accounts (refer to Note 5, “Trade and Installment Accounts Receivable”, in the Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements).

(3)		Includes the after-tax impact of approximately $19 million for the quarterly restatement of commission expense. Also includes an after-tax charge of approximately $2 million in connection with certain DPA related costs, an after-tax charge of approximately $9 million for severance and other expenses in connection with a restructuring plan (refer to “Shareholder Litigation and Government Investigation Settlement” and “Restructuring Charge” within Results of Operations), a tax charge of $2 million relating to the loss on a sale/leaseback transaction, an after-tax credit of approximately $2 million related to a reduction in the allowance for doubtful accounts (refer to Note 5, “Trade and Installment Accounts Receivable”, in the Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements), and an after-tax credit of approximately $5 million relating to the gain on the sale of assets that were contributed during the formation of Ingres Corp. (refer to Note 2, “Acquisitions, Divestitures and Restructuring”, in the Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements).

(4)		Includes a tax charge of $36 million required due to the company’s finalization of its 2006 tax estimates, including its repatriation of $584 million of cash in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2006. (Refer to “Income Taxes” within Results of Operations). Also includes an after-tax charge of approximately $3 million in connection with certain DPA related costs, an after-tax charge of approximately $9 million for severance and other expenses in connection with a restructuring plan (refer to “Shareholder Litigation and Government Investigation Settlement” and “Restructuring Charge” within Results of Operations), a tax charge of approximately $2 million relating to the loss on a sale-leaseback transaction, and after-tax credits of approximately $1 million related to a reduction in the allowance for doubtful accounts (refer to Note 5, “Trade and Installment Accounts Receivable”, in the Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements), $6 million due to full year reductions in variable compensation programs, and $7 million due to the Company’s decision in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2006 to forego its discretionary contribution to the company-sponsored 401(k) plan.

(5)		Includes an after-tax charge of approximately $130 million related to the shareholder litigation and government investigation settlements, an after-tax charge of approximately $17 million for severance and other expenses in connection with a restructuring plan (refer to “Shareholder Litigation and Government Investigation Settlement” and “Restructuring Charge” within Results of Operations), and an after-tax credit of approximately $3 million related to a reduction in the allowance for doubtful accounts (refer to Note 5, “Trade and Installment Accounts Receivable”, in the Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements).

(6)		Includes an after-tax charge of approximately $6 million of cash and stock-based compensation expense associated with the appointment of our new President and CEO in November 2004 and an after-tax credit of approximately $4 million related to a reduction in the allowance for doubtful accounts (refer to Note 5, “Trade and Installment Accounts Receivable”, in the Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements).

(7)		Includes a tax expense charge of $55 million related to the repatriation of $500 million in cash under the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (Refer to “Income Taxes” within Results of Operations), an after-tax gain of approximately $10 million related to the settlement with Quest Software Inc., and an after-tax credit of


		approximately $8 million related to a reduction in the allowance for doubtful accounts (refer to Note 5, “Trade and Installment Accounts Receivable”, in the Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements).

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our cash balances, including cash equivalents, are held in numerous locations throughout the world, and a substantial portion resides outside the United States. In fiscal year 2006, the Company repatriated approximately $584 million in cash to the United States in order to avail itself of the provisions of the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004. The aggregate amount of taxes related to the repatriation was approximately $55 million.

Sources and Uses of Cash

Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities totaled $1.87 billion on March 31, 2006, a decrease of $1.26 billion from the March 31, 2005 balance of $3.13 billion. Cash generated from continuing operations was $1.38 billion and represented the Company’s primary source of liquidity in fiscal year 2006. This cash generated was primarily used to fund acquisitions, repay debt and repurchase common shares.

In fiscal year 2006, cash provided by continuing operating activities was positively impacted by a decrease of receivable cycles and an increase of payable cycles. During the quarter ended September 30, 2005, the Company undertook a review of its accounts receivable and accounts payable collection/payment cycles and determined that improvements in each could be made. The improvements associated with accounts receivable were related principally to improved collection procedures, including an increased emphasis on obtaining payment of initial customer invoices at the time of contract signing. Management believes that these improvements are sustainable but any further improvements in the accounts receivable collection cycle will not materially impact liquidity in future years. The increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses of $101 million was principally related to a concerted effort to make payments to vendors on an extended basis. Management has determined that its payables cycle has exceeded an optimal level and that it should be reduced. Therefore, the Company expects a reduction in the level of days payable outstanding, which will likely have an adverse effect on future cash provided by operating activities, particularly in the first quarter of fiscal year 2007.

Under both the prior business model and current business model, customers generally pay for the right to use our software products over the term of the associated software license agreement. We refer to these payments as installment payments. While the transition to the current business model has changed the timing of revenue recognition, in most cases it has not changed the timing of how we bill and collect cash from customers. As a result, our cash generated from operations has generally not been affected by the transition to the current business model over the past several years. We do not expect any significant changes in our cash generated from operations as a result of this transition.

The timing and amount of installment payments committed under any specific license agreement is often the result of negotiations with the customer and can vary from year to year. In fiscal year 2006, our cash provided by continuing operations was positively impacted by certain arrangements under which the entire contract value or a substantial portion of the contract value was due in one single installment upon execution of the agreement, rather than being invoiced on an annual basis over the life of the contract. Upon receipt, these amounts are reflected as increases in deferred subscription revenue (collected) in the liability section of the balance sheet. Deferred subscription revenue (collected), both current and non-current, of $1.96 billion at March 31, 2006 increased approximately $280 million, compared to $1.68 billion at March 31, 2005. The increase of the non-current portion, from $273 million to $448 million, was primarily related to these types of arrangements, approximately half of which related to the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2006. As previously noted, collections of these amounts positively impact current year cash flows provided from operating activities and collections that would have been attributable to later years (i.e. the non-current portion) will not be available as a source of cash in such later years as the revenue is recognized. Although we cannot predict with certainty the amount of future license agreements that will be executed with similar payment terms, we expect the aggregate dollar value of these arrangements to decline in fiscal year 2007 as compared to fiscal year 2006.

The Company’s estimate of the fair value of net installment accounts receivable recorded under the prior business model approximates carrying value. Amounts due from customers under our business model are offset by deferred

subscription value related to these license agreements, leaving no or minimal net carrying value on the balance sheet for such amounts. The fair value of such amounts may exceed this carrying value but cannot be practically assessed since there is no existing market for a pool of customer receivables with contractual commitments similar to those owned by us. The actual fair value may not be known until these amounts are sold, securitized, or collected. Although these customer license agreements commit the customer to payment under a fixed schedule, the agreements are considered executory in nature due to the ongoing commitment to provide unspecified future upgrades as part of the agreement terms.

Under our business model, we can estimate the total amounts to be billed and/or collected at the conclusion of a reporting period. For current business model contracts, amounts we expect to bill within the next fiscal year at March 31, 2006, declined by $0.11 billion to approximately $1.68 billion from the prior year. Amounts we expect to bill for periods after 12 months declined by $0.45 billion to $1.24 billion. These declines are due to a combination of the accelerated payments noted above and the timing of the renewal of existing contracts. The estimated amounts expected to be collected and a reconciliation of such amounts to the amounts we recorded as accounts receivable are as follows:

Reconciliation of Amounts to be Collected to Receivables


	March 31,			March 31,
	2006			2005
	(in millions)

Current:
Accounts receivable	$	828		$	794
Other receivables		77			39
Amounts to be billed within the next 12 months — business model		1,680			1,794
Amounts to be billed within the next 12 months — prior business model		253			391
Less: allowance for doubtful accounts		(25	)		(35	)

Net amounts expected to be collected — current		2,813			2,983

Less:
Unamortized discounts		(44	)		(62	)
Unearned maintenance		(4	)		(23	)
Deferred subscription revenue — current, billed		(606	)		(369	)
Deferred subscription value — current, uncollected		(476	)		(661	)
Deferred subscription value — noncurrent, uncollected, related to current accounts receivable		(1,204	)		(1,133	)
Unearned professional services		(47	)		(14	)

Trade and installment accounts receivable — current, net		432			721

Non-Current:
Amounts to be billed beyond the next 12 months — business model		1,236			1,698
Amounts to be billed beyond the next 12 months — prior business model		511			759
Less: allowance for doubtful accounts		(20	)		(53	)

Net amounts expected to be collected — noncurrent		1,727			2,404

Less:
Unamortized discounts		(34	)		(79	)
Unearned maintenance		(8	)		(32	)
Deferred subscription value — noncurrent, uncollected		(1,236	)		(1,698	)

Installment accounts receivable — noncurrent, net		449			595

Total accounts receivable, net	$	881		$	1,316


	March 31,		March 31,
	2006		2005
	(in millions)

Deferred Subscription Value:
Deferred subscription revenue (collected) — current	$	1,517	$	1,407
Deferred subscription revenue (collected) — noncurrent		448		273
Deferred subscription revenue current, billed		606		369
Deferred subscription value — current, uncollected		476		661
Deferred subscription value — noncurrent, uncollected, related to current accounts receivable		1,204		1,133
Deferred subscription value — noncurrent, uncollected		1,236		1,698

Aggregate deferred subscription value balance	$	5,487	$	5,541

Approximately 10% of the total deferred subscription value balance of approximately $5.49 billion at March 31, 2006 is associated with multi-year contracts signed with the U.S. Federal Government and other U.S. state and local governmental agencies that are generally subject to annual fiscal funding approval and/or may be terminated at the convenience of the government. While funding under these contracts is not assured, we do not believe any circumstances exist which might indicate that such funding will not be approved and paid in accordance with the terms of our contracts. For any contracts with governmental agencies who are first-time customers that are subject to annual fiscal funding approval, we generally do not record the deferred subscription value for the unbilled portion of the contract until the funding is approved. We also receive contracts from non-U.S. governmental agencies that contain similar provisions. The total balance of deferred subscription value related to non-U.S. governmental agencies that may be terminated at the convenience of the agencies is not material to the overall deferred subscription value balance.

Unbilled amounts under the Company’s business model are collectible over one to five years. As of March 31, 2006, on a cumulative basis, approximately 58%, 87%, 97%, 99% and 100% of amounts due from customers recorded under the Company’s business model come due within fiscal years ended 2007 through 2011, respectively.

Unbilled amounts under the prior business model are collectible over three to six years. As of March 31, 2006, on a cumulative basis, approximately 33%, 53%, 68%, 82% and 94% of amounts due from customers recorded under the prior business model come due within fiscal years ended 2007 through 2011, respectively.

Fiscal Year 2006 compared to Fiscal Year 2005

Operating Activities

Cash generated from continuing operating activities for fiscal year 2006 of $1.38 billion declined by approximately 10% compared to the prior year’s cash from continuing operations of $1.53 billion. The decrease in cash generated from continuing operations was the result of several factors. The Company experienced an increase of approximately $254 million in collections on accounts receivable compared to the prior year. This increase was more than offset by year over year increases in payments for taxes of approximately $195 million, incremental restitution fund payments of $75 million, and higher payments to vendors and employees of approximately $165 million. The level of payments to vendors in the current year was favorably impacted by the Company’s concerted effort to extend payment terms. In fiscal year 2006, the Company experienced an increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses of approximately $101 million, compared to the prior year which experienced a decrease of $141 million.

Investing Activities

Cash used in investing activities was approximately $847 million compared to $740 million in the prior year. The change in cash from investing activities primarily relates to $1.01 billion of cash used to fund recent acquisitions. Partly offsetting the cash used for acquisitions was $398 million in cash received from the sales of marketable securities. In addition, the Company also entered into three sale/leaseback transactions during the second half of fiscal year 2006, due to our restructuring initiatives and our associated review of the benefits of owning versus

leasing certain properties. Total cash realized from these transactions was approximately $75 million. All of these transactions were recorded in accordance with SFAS 28, “Accounting for Sales with Leasebacks — an amendment of FASB Statement No. 13”.

Financing Activities

The primary use of cash for financing activities has been the repayment of debt and the repurchase of treasury stock, as discussed below.

As of March 31, 2006 and 2005, our debt arrangements consisted of the following:


	2006				2005
	Maximum		Outstanding		Maximum		Outstanding
	Available		Balance		Available		Balance
	(in millions)

Debt Arrangements
2004 Revolving Credit Facility (expires December 2008)	$	1,000	$	—	$	1,000	$	—
6.375% Senior Notes due April 2005		—		—		—		825
6.500% Senior Notes due April 2008		—		350		—		350
4.750% Senior Notes due December 2009		—		500		—		500
1.625% Convertible Senior Notes due December 2009		—		460		—		460
5.625% Senior Notes due December 2014		—		500		—		500
Other		—		1		—		1

Total			$	1,811			$	2,636

At March 31, 2006, we had $1.81 billion in debt and $1.87 billion in cash and marketable securities. Our net liquidity position was approximately $54 million.

Additionally, we reported restricted cash balances of $60 million and $67 million at March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, which were included in the “Other noncurrent assets” line item.

In April 2005, we repaid, as scheduled, the $825 million 6.375% Senior Notes issued during the fiscal year ended March 31, 1999 using our available cash balances (see Fiscal Year 1999 Senior Notes for details).

During fiscal year 2005, we issued $1 billion of senior notes and redeemed approximately $660 million in outstanding debt compared to a net debt reduction of approximately $826 million in fiscal year 2004.

2004 Revolving Credit Facility

In December 2004, we entered into a new unsecured, revolving credit facility (the 2004 Revolving Credit Facility). The maximum committed amount available under the 2004 Revolving Credit Facility is $1 billion, exclusive of incremental credit increases of up to an additional $250 million which are available subject to certain conditions and the agreement of our lenders. The 2004 Revolving Credit Facility expires December 2008 and no amount was drawn as of March 31, 2006 or March 31, 2005. Refer to Note 6, “Debt”, in the Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

Borrowings under the 2004 Revolving Credit Facility will bear interest at a rate dependent on our credit ratings at the time of such borrowings and will be calculated according to a base rate or a Eurocurrency rate, as the case may be, plus an applicable margin and utilization fee. Depending on our credit rating at the time of borrowing, the applicable margin can range from 0% to 0.325% for a base rate borrowing and from 0.50% to 1.325% for a Eurocurrency borrowing, and the utilization fee can range from 0.125% to 0.250%. At our current credit ratings, the applicable margin would be 0% for a base rate borrowing and 0.70% for a Eurocurrency borrowing, and the utilization fee would be 0.125%. In addition, we must pay facility fees quarterly at rates dependent on our credit ratings. The facility fees can range from 0.125% to 0.30% of the aggregate amount of each lender’s full revolving

credit commitment (without taking into account any outstanding borrowings under such commitments). At our current credit ratings, the facility fee is 0.175% of the aggregate amount of each lender’s revolving credit commitment.

The 2004 Revolving Credit Facility contains customary covenants for transactions of this type, including two financial covenants: (i) for the 12 months ending each quarter-end, the ratio of consolidated debt for borrowed money to consolidated cash flow, each as defined in the 2004 Revolving Credit Facility, must not exceed 3.25 for the quarter ending December 31, 2004 and 2.75 for quarters ending March 31, 2005 and thereafter; and (ii) for the 12-months ending each quarter-end, the ratio of consolidated cash flow to the sum of interest payable on, and amortization of debt discount in respect of, all consolidated debt for borrowed money, as defined in the 2004 Revolving Credit Facility, must not be less than 5.00. In addition, as a condition precedent to each borrowing made under the 2004 Revolving Credit Facility, as of the date of such borrowing, (i) no event of default shall have occurred and be continuing and (ii) we are to reaffirm that the representations and warranties made in the 2004 Revolving Credit Facility (other than the representation with respect to material adverse changes, but including the representation regarding the absence of certain material litigation) are correct.

Fiscal Year 1999 Senior Notes

In fiscal year 1999, the Company issued $1.75 billion of unsecured Senior Notes in a transaction pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933 (Rule 144A). Amounts borrowed, rates, and maturities for each issue were $575 million at 6.25% due April 15, 2003, $825 million at 6.375% due April 15, 2005, and $350 million at 6.5% due April 15, 2008. In April 2005, the Company repaid the $825 million remaining balance of the 6.375% Senior Notes from available cash balances. As of March 31, 2006, $350 million of the 6.5% Senior Notes remained outstanding.

Fiscal Year 2005 Senior Notes

In November 2004, the Company issued an aggregate of $1 billion of unsecured Senior Notes (2005 Senior Notes) in a transaction pursuant to Rule 144A. The Company issued $500 million of 4.75%, 5-year notes due December 2009 and $500 million of 5.625%, 10-year notes due December 2014. The Company has the option to redeem the 2005 Senior Notes at any time, at redemption prices equal to the greater of (i) 100% of the aggregate principal amount of the notes of such series being redeemed and (ii) the present value of the principal and interest payable over the life of the 2005 Senior Notes, discounted at a rate equal to 15 basis points and 20 basis points for the 5-year notes and 10-year notes, respectively, over a comparable U.S. Treasury bond yield. The maturity of the 2005 Senior Notes may be accelerated by the holders upon certain events of default, including failure to make payments when due and failure to comply with covenants in the 2005 Senior Notes. The 5-year notes were issued at a price equal to 99.861% of the principal amount and the 10-year notes at a price equal to 99.505% of the principal amount for resale under Rule 144A and Regulation S. The Company also agreed for the benefit of the holders to register the 2005 Senior Notes under the Securities Act of 1933 pursuant to a registered exchange offer so that the 2005 Senior Notes may be sold in the public market. Because the Company did not meet certain deadlines for completion of the exchange offer, the interest rate on the 2005 Senior Notes increased by 25 basis points as of September 27, 2005 and increased by an additional 25 basis points as of December 26, 2005 since the delay was not cured prior to that date. After the delay is cured, such additional interest on the 2005 Senior Notes will no longer be payable. The Company expects to register the 2005 Senior Notes in the second quarter of fiscal year 2007. The Company used the net proceeds from this issuance to repay debt as described above.

1.625% Convertible Senior Notes

3% Concord Convertible Notes

In connection with our acquisition of Concord in June 2005, we assumed $86 million in 3% convertible senior notes due 2023. In accordance with the notes’ terms, we redeemed (for cash) the notes in full in July 2005.

International Line of Credit

An unsecured and uncommitted multi-currency line of credit is available to meet short-term working capital needs for our subsidiaries operating outside the United States. The line of credit is available on an offering basis, meaning that transactions under the line of credit will be on such terms and conditions, including interest rate, maturity, representations, covenants and events of default, as mutually agreed between our subsidiaries and the local bank at the time of each specific transaction. As of March 31, 2006, this line totaled approximately $5 million and approximately $3 million was pledged in support of bank guarantees. Amounts drawn under these facilities as of March 31, 2006 were minimal.

In addition to the above facility, our foreign subsidiaries use guarantees issued by commercial banks to guarantee performance on certain contracts. At March 31, 2006 the aggregate amount of significant guarantees outstanding was approximately $5 million, none of which had been drawn down by third parties.

Share Repurchases, Stock Option Exercises and Dividends

We repurchased approximately $590 million of common stock in connection with our publicly announced corporate buyback program in fiscal year 2006 compared with $161 million in fiscal year 2005; we received approximately $97 million in proceeds resulting from the exercise of Company stock options in fiscal year 2006 compared with $73 million in fiscal year 2005; and we paid dividends of $93 million, $47 million and $47 million in each of the fiscal years 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

As announced in April 2005, beginning in fiscal year 2006 we increased our annual cash dividend to $0.16 per share, which was paid out in quarterly installments of $0.04 per share as and when declared by the Board of Directors.

On June 26, 2006, the Board of Directors authorized a new $2 billion common stock repurchase plan for fiscal year 2007 which will replace the $600 million common stock repurchase plan announced in March 2006.

Effect of Exchange Rate Changes

There was a negative $63 million impact to our cash flows in fiscal year 2006 predominantly due to the weakening of the British pound and the euro against the dollar of approximately 8% and 6%, respectively. In fiscal year 2005, we had a $47 million favorable impact to our cash flows predominantly due to a strengthening of the pound and euro of approximately 3% and 5%, respectively.

Other Matters

As of June 2006, our senior unsecured notes are rated Ba1, BBB- and BBB- by Moody’s, S&P and Fitch, respectively, and are on negative outlook by all three agencies. Peak borrowings under all debt facilities during the fiscal year 2006 totaled approximately $2.64 billion, with a weighted average interest rate of 4.9%.

In March 2005, we pre-funded contributions to the CA Savings Harvest Plan, a 401(k) plan. The Company elected not to pre-fund its contribution in March 2006 as a result of IRS Treasury Regulations eliminating the tax benefit associated with the pre-funding of elective and matching contributions.

Capital resource requirements as of March 31, 2006 consisted of lease obligations for office space, equipment, mortgage and loan obligations, our ERP implementation, and amounts due as a result of product and company acquisitions. Refer to “Contractual Obligations and Commitments” for additional information.

It is expected that existing cash, cash equivalents, marketable securities, the availability of borrowings under existing and renewable credit lines and in the capital markets, and cash expected to be provided from operations will

be sufficient to meet ongoing cash requirements. We expect our long-standing history of providing extended payment terms to our customers to continue.

We expect to use existing cash balances and future cash generated from operations to fund financing activities such as the repayment of our debt balances as they mature as well as the repurchase of shares of common stock and the payment of dividends as approved by our Board of Directors. Cash generated will also be used for investing activities such as future acquisitions as well as additional capital spending, including our continued investment in our ERP implementation.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have commitments to invest approximately $3 million in connection with joint venture agreements.

Prior to fiscal year 2001, we sold individual accounts receivable under the prior business model to a third party subject to certain recourse provisions. The outstanding principal balance subject to recourse of these receivables approximated $146 million and $183 million as of March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. As of March 31, 2006, we have not incurred any losses related to these receivables. Other than the commitments and recourse provisions described above, we do not have any other off-balance sheet arrangements with unconsolidated entities or related parties and, accordingly, off-balance sheet risks to our liquidity and capital resources from unconsolidated entities are limited.

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

We have commitments under certain contractual arrangements to make future payments for goods and services. These contractual arrangements secure the rights to various assets and services to be used in the future in the normal course of business. For example, we are contractually committed to make certain minimum lease payments for the use of property under operating lease agreements. In accordance with current accounting rules, the future rights and related obligations pertaining to such contractual arrangements are not reported as assets or liabilities on our Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets. We expect to fund these contractual arrangements with cash generated from operations in the normal course of business.

The following table summarizes our contractual arrangements at March 31, 2006 and the timing and effect that such commitments are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flow in future periods. In addition, the table summarizes the timing of payments on our debt obligations as reported on our Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheet as of March 31, 2006.


	Payments Due by Period
			Less Than		1-3		3-5		More than
	Total		1 Year		Years		Years		5 Years
	(in millions)

Contractual Obligations
Long-term debt obligations (inclusive of interest)	$	2,223	$	85	$	506	$	1,048	$	584
Operating lease obligations(1)		612		128		186		111		187
Purchase obligations		118		50		37		25		6
Other long-term liabilities(2)		78		17		25		14		22

Total	$	3,031	$	280	$	754	$	1,198	$	799


(1)		The contractual obligations for noncurrent operating leases include sublease income totaling $93 million expected to be received in the following periods: $25 million (less than 1 year); $40 million (1-3 years); $18 million (3-5 years); and $10 million (more than 5 years).

(2)		Other long-term liabilities primarily relate to operating expenses associated with operating lease obligations.

As of March 31, 2006, we have no material capital lease obligations, either individually or in the aggregate.

Outlook for Fiscal Year 2007

This outlook contains certain forward-looking statements and information relating to us that are based on the beliefs and assumptions made by management, as well as information currently available to management. Should business conditions change or should our assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those described below. We do not intend to update these forward-looking statements.

The outlook for our fiscal year 2007 is based on the assumption that there will be limited-to-modest improvement in the current economic and IT environments. We also believe customers will continue to be cautious with their technology purchases.

Our preliminary outlook for fiscal year 2007 is to generate revenue of approximately $3.9 billion, earnings per share of approximately $0.44 as calculated on a GAAP (General Accepted Accounting Principles) basis, and cash generated from operations of $1.3 billion.

We expect that:


•	We will incur approximately $105 million (pre-tax) in non-cash stock-based compensation charges in connection with SFAS No. 123(R) (we incurred approximately $96 million of total stock-based compensation charges in fiscal year 2006);

•	Cash generated from operations will be negatively impacted by an additional $200 million in tax payments, higher disbursements due to a decline in the days payables cycle and lower collections from contracts with accelerated payment terms; and

•	Our effective tax rate should be 34% in fiscal year 2007.

The outlook has not been adjusted to reflect the $2 billion repurchase plan. This outlook also assumes that the Company will take steps to achieve certain cost savings. These steps may have related non-operating costs that would have a negative effect on GAAP earnings per share. The Company has not yet identified these savings or quantified their potential impact on GAAP earnings per share, and it is possible that GAAP earnings per share could be lower than the amount included in this outlook.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

We review our financial reporting and disclosure practices and accounting policies quarterly to help ensure that they provide accurate and transparent information relative to the current economic and business environment. Note 1, “Significant Accounting Policies”, in the Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements contains a summary of the significant accounting policies that we use. Many of these accounting policies involve complex situations and require a high degree of judgment, either in the application and interpretation of existing accounting literature or in the development of estimates that impact our financial statements. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates and judgments based on historical experience as well as other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. These estimates may change in the future if underlying assumptions or factors change.

We consider the following significant accounting polices to be critical because of their complexity and the high degree of judgment involved in implementing them.

Revenue Recognition

We generate revenue from the following primary sources: (1) licensing software products; (2) providing customer technical support (referred to as maintenance); and (3) providing professional services, such as consulting and education.

We recognize revenue pursuant to the requirements of Statement of Position 97-2 “Software Revenue Recognition” (SOP 97-2), issued by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as amended by SOP 98-9 “Modification of SOP 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, With Respect to Certain Transactions.” In accordance with SOP 97-2, we begin to recognize revenue from licensing and supporting our software products when all of the following criteria are met: (1) we have evidence of an arrangement with a customer; (2) we deliver the products;

(3) license agreement terms are deemed fixed or determinable and free of contingencies or uncertainties that may alter the agreement such that it may not be complete and final; and (4) collection is probable.

Our software licenses generally do not include acceptance provisions. An acceptance provision allows a customer to test the software for a defined period of time before committing to license the software. If a license agreement includes an acceptance provision, we do not record deferred subscription value or recognize revenue until the earlier of the receipt of a written customer acceptance or, if not notified by the customer to cancel the license agreement, the expiration of the acceptance period.

Under our business model, software license agreements include flexible contractual provisions that, among other things, allow customers to receive unspecified future software upgrades for no additional fee. These agreements combine the right to use the software product with maintenance for the term of the agreement. Under these agreements, we recognize revenue ratably over the term of the license agreement beginning upon completion of the four SOP 97-2 recognition criteria noted above. For license agreements signed prior to October 2000 (the prior business model), once all four of the above noted revenue recognition criteria were met, software license fees were recognized as revenue up-front, and the maintenance fees were deferred and subsequently recognized as revenue over the term of the license.

Maintenance revenue is derived from two primary sources: (1) combined license and maintenance agreements recorded under the prior business model; and (2) stand-alone maintenance agreements.

Under the prior business model, maintenance and license fees were generally combined into a single license agreement. The maintenance portion was deferred and amortized into revenue over the initial license agreement term. Some of these license agreements have not reached the end of their initial terms and, therefore, continue to amortize. This amortization is recorded on the “Maintenance” line item on the Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations. The deferred maintenance portion, which was optional to the customer, was determined using its fair value based on annual, fixed maintenance renewal rates stated in the agreement. For license agreements entered into under our current business model, maintenance and license fees continue to be combined; however, the maintenance is inclusive for the entire term. We report such combined fees on the “Subscription revenue” line item on the Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations.

We also record stand-alone maintenance revenue earned from customers who elect optional maintenance. Revenue from such renewals is recognized as maintenance revenue over the term of the renewal agreement.

The “Deferred maintenance revenue” line item on our Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets principally represents payments received in advance of maintenance services rendered.

Revenue from professional service arrangements is recognized pursuant to the provisions of SOP 97-2, which in most cases is as the services are performed. Revenues from professional services that are sold as part of a software transaction are deferred and recognized on a ratable basis over the life of the related software transaction. If it is not probable that a project will be completed or the payment will be received, revenue is deferred until the uncertainty is removed.

Revenue from sales to distributors, resellers, and VARs is recognized when all four of the SOP 97-2 revenue recognition criteria noted above are met and when these entities sell the software product to their customers. This is commonly referred to as the sell-through method. Beginning July 1, 2004, sales of our products made by distributors, resellers and VARs to their customers incorporate the right for the end-users to receive certain upgraded software products at no additional fee. Accordingly, revenue from those contracts is recognized on a ratable basis.

We have an established business practice of offering installment payment options to customers and have a history of successfully collecting substantially all amounts due under such agreements. We assess collectibility based on a number of factors, including past transaction history with the customer and the creditworthiness of the customer. If, in our judgment, collection of a fee is not probable, we will not recognize revenue until the uncertainty is removed through the receipt of cash payment.

Our standard licensing agreements include a product warranty provision for all products. Such warranties are accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies.” The likelihood that we would be required to make refunds to customers under such provisions is considered remote.

Under the terms of substantially all of our license agreements, we have agreed to indemnify customers for costs and damages arising from claims against such customers based on, among other things, allegations that our software products infringe the intellectual property rights of a third party. In most cases, in the event of an infringement claim, we retain the right to (i) procure for the customer the right to continue using the software product; (ii) replace or modify the software product to eliminate the infringement while providing substantially equivalent functionality; or (iii) if neither (i) nor (ii) can be reasonably achieved, we may terminate the license agreement and refund to the customer a pro-rata portion of the fees paid. Such indemnification provisions are accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 5. The likelihood that we would be required to make refunds to customers under such provisions is considered remote. In most cases and where legally enforceable, the indemnification is limited to the amount paid by the customer.

Accounts Receivable

The allowance for doubtful accounts is a valuation account used to reserve for the potential impairment of accounts receivable on the balance sheet. In developing the estimate for the allowance for doubtful accounts, we rely on several factors, including:


•	Historical information, such as general collection history of multi-year software agreements;

•	Current customer information/events, such as extended delinquency, requests for restructuring, and filing for bankruptcy;

•	Results of analyzing historical and current data; and

•	The overall macroeconomic environment.

The allowance is comprised of two components: (a) specifically identified receivables that are reviewed for impairment when, based on current information, we do not expect to collect the full amount due from the customer; and (b) an allowance for losses inherent in the remaining receivable portfolio based on the analysis of the specifically reviewed receivables.

We expect the allowance for doubtful accounts to continue to decline as net installment accounts receivable under the prior business model are billed and collected. Under our business model, amounts due from customers are offset by deferred subscription value (unearned revenue) related to these amounts, resulting in little or no carrying value on the balance sheet. Therefore, a smaller allowance for doubtful accounts is required.

Sales Commissions

We accrue sales commissions based on, among other things, estimates of how our sales personnel will perform against specified annual sales quotas. These estimates involve assumptions regarding the Company’s projected new product sales and billings. All of these assumptions reflect our best estimates, but these items involve uncertainties, and as a result, if other assumptions had been used in the period, sales commission expense could have been impacted for that period. Under our current sales compensation model, during periods of high growth and sales of new products relative to revenue in that period, the amount of sales commission expense attributable to the license agreement would be recognized fully in the year and could negatively impact income and earnings per share in that period, particularly in the second half of the fiscal year when new contract values are traditionally higher than in the first half.

Income Taxes

When we prepare our consolidated financial statements, we estimate our income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate. We record this amount as a provision for taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” This process requires us to estimate our actual current tax liability in each jurisdiction; estimate differences resulting from differing treatment of items for financial statement purposes versus tax return purposes

(known as “temporary differences”), which result in deferred tax assets and liabilities; and assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets and net operating losses will be recovered from future taxable income. If we believe that recovery is not likely, we establish a valuation allowance. We have recognized as a deferred tax asset a portion of the tax benefits connected with losses related to operations. As of March 31, 2006, our gross deferred tax assets, net of a valuation allowance, totaled $609 million. Realization of these deferred tax assets assumes that we will be able to generate sufficient future taxable income so that these assets will be realized. The factors that we consider in assessing the likelihood of realization include the forecast of future taxable income and available tax planning strategies that could be implemented to realize the deferred tax assets.

Deferred tax assets result from acquisition expenses, such as duplicate facility costs, employee severance and other costs that are not deductible until paid, net operating losses (NOLs) and temporary differences between the taxable cash payments received from customers and the ratable recognition of revenue in accordance with GAAP. The NOLs expire between 2007 and 2026. Additionally, approximately $57 million and $28 million of the valuation allowance as of March 31, 2006 and March 31, 2005, respectively, is attributable to acquired NOLs which are subject to annual limitations under IRS Code Section 382. Future results may vary from these estimates. At this time it is not practicable to determine if we will need to increase the valuation allowance or if such future valuations will have a material impact on our financial statements.

Goodwill, Capitalized Software Products, and Other Intangible Assets

SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” requires an impairment-only approach to accounting for goodwill. Absent any prior indicators of impairment, we perform an annual impairment analysis during the fourth quarter of our fiscal year. We performed our annual assessment for fiscal year 2006 and concluded that there were no impairments to record.

The SFAS No. 142 goodwill impairment model is a two-step process. The first step is used to identify potential impairment by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its net book value (or carrying amount), including goodwill. If the fair value exceeds the carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is considered not impaired and the second step of the impairment test is unnecessary. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step of the goodwill impairment test is performed to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. The second step of the goodwill impairment test compares the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit’s goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill recognized in a business combination. That is, the fair value of the reporting unit is allocated to all of the assets and liabilities of that unit (including any unrecognized intangible assets) as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination and the fair value of the reporting unit was the purchase price paid to acquire the reporting unit.

Determining the fair value of a reporting unit under the first step of the goodwill impairment test, and determining the fair value of individual assets and liabilities of a reporting unit (including unrecognized intangible assets) under the second step of the goodwill impairment test, is judgmental in nature and often involves the use of significant estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions could have a significant impact on whether an impairment charge is recognized and the magnitude of any such charge. Estimates of fair value are primarily determined using discounted cash flow and are based on our best estimate of future revenue and operating costs and general market conditions. These estimates are subject to review and approval by senior management. This approach uses significant assumptions, including projected future cash flow, the discount rate reflecting the risk inherent in future cash flow, and a terminal growth rate.

The carrying value of capitalized software products, both purchased software and internally developed software, and other intangible assets, are reviewed on a regular basis for the existence of internal and external facts or circumstances that may suggest impairment. The facts and circumstances considered include an assessment of the net realizable value for capitalized software products and the future recoverability of cost for other intangible assets as of the balance sheet date. It is not possible for us to predict the likelihood of any possible future impairments or, if such an impairment were to occur, the magnitude thereof.

Product Development and Enhancements

We account for product development and enhancements in accordance with SFAS No. 86, “Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software to be Sold, Leased, or Otherwise Marketed.” SFAS No. 86 specifies that costs incurred internally in researching and developing a computer software product should be charged to expense until technological feasibility has been established for the product. Once technological feasibility is established, all software costs are capitalized until the product is available for general release to customers. Judgment is required in determining when technological feasibility of a product is established and assumptions are used that reflect our best estimates. If other assumptions had been used in the current period to estimate technological feasibility, the reported product development and enhancement expense could have been impacted.

Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation

We currently maintain stock-based compensation plans. We use the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to compute the estimated fair value of certain stock-based awards. The Black-Scholes model includes assumptions regarding dividend yields, expected volatility, expected lives, and risk-free interest rates. These assumptions reflect our best estimates, but these items involve uncertainties based on market and other conditions outside of our control. As a result, if other assumptions had been used, stock-based compensation expense could have been materially impacted. Furthermore, if different assumptions are used in future periods, stock-based compensation expense could be materially impacted in future years.

As described in Note 9, “Stock Plans,” in the Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements, performance share units are awards granted under the long-term incentive plan for senior executives where the number of shares or restricted shares as applicable, ultimately received by the employee depends on Company performance measured against specified targets and will be determined after a three-year or one-year period as applicable. The fair value of each award is estimated on the date that the performance targets are established based on the fair value of the Company’s stock and the Company’s estimate of the level of achievement of its performance targets. Each quarter, the Company compares the actual performance the Company expects to achieve with the performance targets.

Legal Contingencies

We are currently involved in various legal proceedings and claims. Periodically, we review the status of each significant matter and assess our potential financial exposure. If the potential loss from any legal proceeding or claim is considered probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated, we accrue a liability for the estimated loss. Significant judgment is required in both the determination of probability of a loss and the determination as to whether an exposure is reasonably estimable. Due to the uncertainties related to these matters, accruals are based only on the best information available at the time. As additional information becomes available, we reassess the potential liability related to our pending litigation and claims, and may revise our estimates. Such revisions could have a material impact on our results of operations and financial condition. Refer to Note 7, “Commitments and Contingencies”, in the Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements for a description of our material legal proceedings.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In October 2004, the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 was signed into law. This act introduced a special one-time dividends received deduction on the repatriation of certain foreign earnings to a U.S. taxpayer (repatriation provision), provided that certain criteria are met. In addition, on December 21, 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. FAS 109-2, “Accounting and Disclosure Guidance for the Foreign Earnings Repatriation Provision within the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004.” FSP FAS 109-2 provides accounting and disclosure guidance for the repatriation provision. The Company repatriated approximately $584 million of cash under the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 during fiscal year 2006 at a total tax cost of approximately $55 million. Refer to the “Income Taxes” section of this MD&A for further details.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, “Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets,” an amendment of APB Opinion No. 29. SFAS No. 153 addresses the measurement of exchanges of nonmonetary assets and redefines the

scope of transactions that should be measured based on the fair value of the assets exchanged. SFAS No. 153 is effective for nonmonetary asset exchanges beginning in the Company’s second quarter of fiscal year 2006. The adoption of SFAS No. 153 did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In March 2005, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 47 (FIN 47), “Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations.” FIN 47 clarifies the term “conditional asset retirement obligation,” as that term is used in FASB No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations.” FIN 47 also clarifies when an entity has sufficient information to reasonably estimate the fair value of an asset retirement obligation. The Company was required to apply the provisions of FIN 47 in fiscal year 2006. The adoption of FIN 47 did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections,” or SFAS 154, a replacement of APB Opinion No. 20, “Accounting Changes,” and SFAS Statement 3, “Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements”. SFAS 154 changes the requirements for the accounting for and reporting of a change in accounting principle. Previously, most voluntary changes in accounting principle required recognition via a cumulative effect adjustment within net income in the period of the change. SFAS 154 requires retrospective application to prior periods’ financial statements, unless it is impracticable to determine either the period-specific effects or the cumulative effect of the change. SFAS 154 is effective for accounting changes made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005, however, the Statement does not change the transition provisions of any existing accounting pronouncements. The adoption of SFAS 154 did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In November 2005, the FASB issued Staff Position 115-1 “The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments”, or FSP 115-1, that addresses the determination as to when an investment is considered impaired, whether that impairment is other than temporary and the measurement of an impairment loss. FSP 115-1 also includes accounting considerations subsequent to the recognition of an other-than-temporary impairment and requires certain disclosures about unrealized losses that have not been recognized as other-than-temporary impairments. The guidance in FSP 115-1 amends SFAS 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities”, and APB Opinion No. 18, “The Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common Stock”. The final FSP nullifies certain requirements of EITF Issue No. 03-1, “The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments”, and supersedes EITF Topic No. D-44, “Recognition of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment upon the Planned Sale of a Security Whose Cost Exceeds Fair Value”. The guidance in FSP 115-1 is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2005. The adoption of FSP 115-1 did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.


Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Interest Rate Risk

Our exposure to market rate risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to our investment portfolio, debt, and installment accounts receivable. We have a prescribed methodology whereby we invest our excess cash in liquid investments that are comprised of money market funds and debt instruments of government agencies and high-quality corporate issuers (Standard & Poor’s single “A” rating and higher). To mitigate risk, many of the securities have a maturity date within one year, and holdings of any one issuer, excluding the U.S. government, do not exceed 10% of the portfolio. Periodically, the portfolio is reviewed and adjusted if the credit rating of a security held has deteriorated.

As of March 31, 2006, our outstanding debt approximated $1.81 billion, most of which was in fixed rate obligations. If market rates were to decline, we could be required to make payments on the fixed rate debt that would exceed those based on current market rates. Each 25 basis point decrease in interest rates would have an associated annual opportunity cost of approximately $5 million. Each 25 basis point increase or decrease in interest rates would have no material annual effect on variable rate debt interest based on the balances of such debt as of March 31, 2006.

As of March 31, 2006, we did not utilize derivative financial instruments to mitigate the above mentioned interest rate risks.

We offer financing arrangements with installment payment terms in connection with our software license agreements. The aggregate amounts due from customers include an imputed interest element, which can vary with the interest rate environment. Each 25 basis point increase in interest rates would have an associated annual opportunity cost of approximately $9 million.

Foreign Currency Exchange Risk

We conduct business on a worldwide basis through subsidiaries in 48 countries and, as such, a portion of our revenues, earnings, and net investments in foreign affiliates are exposed to changes in foreign exchange rates. We seek to manage our foreign exchange risk in part through operational means, including managing expected local currency revenues in relation to local currency costs and local currency assets in relation to local currency liabilities. In October 2005, the Board of Directors adopted the Risk Management Policy and Procedures (the Policy), which authorizes us to manage, based on management’s assessment, our risks/exposures to foreign currency exchange rates through the use of derivative financial instruments (e.g., forward contracts, options, swaps) or other means. We have not historically used, and do not anticipate using, derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes.

Derivatives are accounted for in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“SFAS 133”). For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006, we entered into derivative contracts with a total notional value of 280 million euros. Derivatives with a notional value of 80 million euros were entered into with the intent of mitigating a certain portion of our euro operating exposure and are part of the Company’s on-going risk management program. Derivatives with a notional value of 200 million euros were entered into during March 2006 with the intent of mitigating a certain portion of the foreign exchange variability associated with the Company’s repatriation of approximately $584 million from its foreign subsidiaries. Hedge accounting under SFAS 133 was not applied to any of the derivatives entered into during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006. The resulting gain of approximately $1 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 is included in the “Other (gains) expenses, net” line on the Unaudited Consolidated Statement of Operations. As of March 31, 2006, there were no derivative contracts outstanding. In April 2006, the Company entered into similar derivative contracts as those entered during the quarter ended March 31, 2006 relating to the Company’s operating exposures.

Equity Price Risk

As of March 31, 2006, we had $22 million in investments in marketable equity securities of publicly traded companies. These securities were considered available-for-sale with any unrealized gains or temporary losses deferred as a component of stockholders’ equity.


Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

Our Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements are listed in the List of Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules filed as part of this Exhibit and are incorporated herein by reference.

The Supplementary Data specified by Item 302 of Regulation S-K as it relates to selected quarterly data is included in Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” Information on the effects of changing prices is not required.


Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

Not applicable.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.

(a) Preliminary evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures

The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company’s reports under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and acting Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. The Company’s management, with participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and acting Chief Financial Officer, will complete its evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 when the Annual Report on Form 10-K is completed. To date, management has identified material weaknesses in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)), which are discussed in (b) below. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and acting Chief Financial Officer have preliminarily concluded that when the Annual Report on Form 10-K is completed, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures will be deemed to be ineffective as a result of these material weaknesses noted in (b) below as well as other potential material weaknesses that may be identified, including ineffective policies and procedures relating to the matters described in the Explanatory Note at the beginning of this Exhibit.

(b) Management’s preliminary report on internal control over financial reporting

The management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

The Company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management has not yet completed its evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2006 based on the framework in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Management’s assessment shall include an evaluation of the design of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting and testing the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. To date, management has identified material weaknesses in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, as described below. To date, management has preliminarily concluded that as a result of these material weaknesses, as of March 31, 2006, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was not effective based upon the criteria in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by COSO.

A material weakness is a control deficiency, or a combination of control deficiencies, that result in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected. Management has identified the following material weaknesses as of March 31, 2006:


	(i)	The Company did not maintain an effective control environment due to a lack of effective communication policies and procedures. Specifically, (a) there was a lack of coordination and communication among certain of the Company’s senior executives with responsibility for the sales and finance functions and within the sales and finance functions regarding potentially significant financial information; and (b) there were communications by certain senior executives that failed to set a proper tone, which could have discouraged escalation of information of possible importance in clarifying or resolving financial issues. These deficiencies resulted in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements would not be prevented or detected and contributed to the material weaknesses in internal controls described in items (ii) and (iii) below.


	(ii)	The Company’s policies and procedures relating to controls over the accounting for sales commissions were not effective. Specifically, the Company did not effectively estimate, record and monitor its sales commissions and related accruals. The Company also did not reconcile its sales commission expense accrual to actual payments on a timely basis. These deficiencies resulted in a material error in the recognition of commission expense, which resulted in a restatement of the interim financial statements for the three and nine-month periods ended December 31, 2005.


	(iii)	The Company’s policies and procedures relating to the identification, analysis and documentation of non-routine tax matters were not effective. The Company’s tax function also did not provide timely communication to management of its assumptions regarding certain non-routine tax matters. This deficiency resulted in a material error in the recognition of taxes associated with the Company’s cash repatriation, which occurred in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2006.

Each of the aforementioned material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting individually resulted in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the Company’s interim or annual financial statements would not have been prevented or detected.

In conducting the Company’s evaluation of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting, management has excluded the acquisition of Wily Technology, Inc., which was completed by the Company during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2006. Wily Technology, Inc. represented approximately $431 million of the Company’s total assets as of March 31, 2006 and approximately $3 million of the Company’s total revenues for the year then ended. The assets of Wily Technology, Inc. included approximately $232 million of goodwill and $126 million of other intangibles as of March 31, 2006.

(c) Changes in internal control over financial reporting

During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2006, the Company was engaged in an ongoing review of its internal control over financial reporting. Based on that review management believes that, during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2006 there were changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, as described below, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, those controls.

During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2006, the Company continued documenting, testing and making improvements to its internal control over financial reporting in light of findings made as a part of the annual assessment of such internal controls for fiscal year 2006. The process is ongoing and the Company will continue to address items that require remediation, work to improve internal controls, and educate and train employees on controls and procedures in order to establish and maintain effective internal control over financial reporting.

Changes under the DPA

As previously reported, and as described more fully in Note 7, “Commitments and Contingencies”, of the Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements in this Exhibit, in September 2004 the Company reached agreements with the USAO and SEC by entering into the DPA with the USAO and by consenting to the SEC’s filing of a Final Consent Judgment (Consent Judgment) in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New

York. The DPA requires the Company to, among other things, undertake certain reforms that will affect its internal control over financial reporting. These include implementing a worldwide financial and enterprise resource planning (ERP) information technology system to improve internal controls, reorganizing and enhancing the Company’s Finance and Internal Audit Departments, and establishing new records management policies and procedures.

The Company believes that these and other reforms, such as procedures to assure proper recognition of revenue, should enhance its internal control over financial reporting. For more information regarding the DPA, refer to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 22, 2004 and the exhibits thereto, including the DPA. For more information regarding the Company’s compliance with the DPA and the Consent Judgment, refer to the information under the heading “Status of the Company’s Compliance with the Deferred Prosecution Agreement and Final Consent Judgment” in the Company’s definitive proxy materials filed on July 26, 2005 and Note 7, “Commitments and Contingencies — The Government Investigation”, in the Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements in this Exhibit.

Changes to remediate fiscal year 2005 material weaknesses

As previously reported in its amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005, the Company determined that, as of the end of fiscal year 2005, there were material weaknesses in its internal control over financial reporting relating to (1) improper accounting of credits attributable to software contracts executed under the Company’s prior business model, which resulted in financial statement restatements of prior years, (2) an ineffective control environment associated with its Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA) region businesses and (3) improper accounting for recording revenue from renewals of certain prior business model license agreements, which resulted in financial statement restatements of prior years.

As reported in the amended Annual Report for fiscal year 2005, the Company began to make a number of changes in its internal control over financial reporting to remediate these material weaknesses. Many of these changes were made during the first quarter of fiscal year 2006 and continued through the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2006. The material weaknesses have been fully remediated by the end of fiscal year 2006.

Specific remediation actions taken by management regarding the material weakness in internal control over financial reporting related to improper accounting of credits attributable to software contracts executed under the Company’s prior business model include the following:


•	During the quarter ended June 30, 2005, the Company began maintaining a separate schedule of credits granted under software contracts executed under the Company’s prior business model;

•	During the quarter ended June 30, 2005, the financial reporting department began quarterly reviews of utilized credits to determine the proper accounting for utilized credits that were originally granted under software contracts executed under the Company’s prior business model; and

•	Beginning with the quarter ended June 30, 2005, management and internal audit began periodic testing of the completeness and accuracy of the credit schedule prepared by the sales accounting department and of all accounting entries related to the utilization of any such credits by the Company’s customers.

Specific remediation actions taken by management regarding the material weakness relating to the control environment associated with the EMEA region include the following:


•	Disciplinary proceedings against members of management and other employees in the EMEA region, leading to their resignation or termination subsequent to March 31, 2005;

•	The appointment of a new Head of Global Procurement in April 2005;

•	The appointment of a new Head of Procurement for the EMEA region in June 2005;

•	The appointment of a new General Manager for the EMEA region in June 2005;

•	The appointment of a new Head of Facilities for the EMEA region in July 2005;

•	The hiring of additional finance personnel, including a new controller for the UK in August 2005;


•	The appointment of a new Chief Financial Officer for the EMEA region in January 2006;

•	The initiation of changes to the roles and responsibilities, as well as reporting lines, of executives in charge of the EMEA region for more effective segregation of duties throughout fiscal year 2006; and

•	Ongoing communications from senior management and provision of training to employees regarding the importance of the control environment, financial integrity, and the Company’s code of ethics.

Specific remediation actions taken by management during the third quarter of fiscal year 2006 regarding the material weakness relating to the accounting error in recording revenue from renewals of certain prior business model license agreements include the following:


	•	The Company completed an inventory of active prior business model contracts on a worldwide basis and established a central database to track such contracts;

	•	The Company revised its revenue recognition checklists to identify the renewal of any prior business model contracts for proper disposition; and

	•	The Company began monitoring the renewal of prior business model license agreements to ensure that any remaining deferred maintenance and unamortized discounts are recognized ratably over the life of the new subscription based license agreement.

Planned remediation of 2006 material weaknesses

Planned remediation efforts regarding the material weakness in internal control over financial reporting related to an ineffective control environment due to a lack of effective communication policies and procedures that include the following:


	•	Personnel and organizational changes:


	•	Appointment of a new Chief Operating Officer and conducting a search to hire a new Chief Financial Officer;

	•	Realignment of reporting of the Chief Financial Officer from Chief Operating Officer to the Chief Executive Officer;

	•	Reorganization of the Sales Function including:


	•	Elimination of the position, Executive Vice President Worldwide Sales, and establishment of direct reporting of the field sales organization to the Chief Operating Officer;

	•	Appointment of a Senior Vice President Sales Operations with direct reporting to the Chief Operating Officer;


	•	Implementation of recurring meetings with representation from key departments including legal, finance, operations and human resources to address operating and financial performance, as well as the identification, tracking and communication of information of potential significance to financial reporting and disclosure issues; and

	•	Provision of focused training relating to ethics, the Company’s Code of Conduct and its core values.

Planned remediation efforts regarding the material weakness in internal control over financial reporting related to sales commissions include the following:


	•	Review of commissions accounting procedures by the Internal Audit Department;

	•	Appointment of a quality review team to assess the adequacy and efficacy of the business processes, IT Systems and financial oversight for the administration of sales commissions;

	•	Formalization of policies and procedures including communication and reporting responsibilities among the Company’s sales, human resources and finance functions to ensure that the administration, payments of and accounting for commissions expense are coordinated;


	•	Reconciliation of commission expense accruals to actual commission payments on a quarterly basis; and

	•	Monitoring of progress on remediation and to provide governance, including organizational alignment, by a cross functional review committee.

Planned remediation efforts regarding the material weakness in internal control over financial reporting related to non-routine tax matters include the following:


	•	Review of the tax department’s policies and procedures including its use of external advisors;

	•	Establishment of new documentation and analysis requirements for non-routine tax matters to ensure among other things, that accounting conclusions involving such matters are thoroughly documented and identify the critical factors that support the basis for such conclusions; and

	•	Formalization of communication and review of non-routine tax matters between the tax function and senior finance management.

Management is committed to the rigorous enforcement of an effective control environment. In addition, management will continue to monitor the results of the remediation activities and test the new controls as part of its review of its internal control over financial reporting for fiscal year 2007.

Other changes in internal control over financial reporting

In the first quarter of fiscal year 2007, the Company began migrating certain financial and sales processing systems to SAP, an enterprise resource planning (“ERP”) system, at its North American operations. This change in information system platform for the Company’s financial and operational systems is part of its on-going project to implement SAP at all of the Company’s facilities worldwide, which is expected to be completed over the next few years. In connection with the SAP implementation, the Company is updating its internal control over financial reporting, as necessary, to accommodate modifications to its business and accounting procedures. The Company believes it is taking the necessary precautions to ensure that the transition to the new ERP system will not have a negative impact on its internal control environment.


Item 9B.	Other Information.

Not applicable.

PART III


Item 10.	Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant.

Reference is made to our definitive proxy statement, to be filed with the SEC, for information concerning our directors. This information is incorporated herein by reference. Also, refer to Part I of this Exhibit for information concerning executive officers under the caption “Executive Officers of the Registrant”.

Information about our compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act is incorporated herein by reference from the discussion that will appear under the heading “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in our definitive proxy statement to be filed with the SEC.

Information about the Audit and Compliance Committee of our Board of Directors, including the members of the Committee and our Audit and Compliance Committee financial expert, is incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement to be filed with the SEC.

We maintain a Business Practices Standard of Excellence: Our Code of Conduct (Code of Conduct), which is applicable to all employees and directors, and is available on our website at ca.com. Any amendment or waiver to the Code of Conduct that applies to our directors or executive officers will be posted on our website or in a report filed with the SEC on Form 8-K. The Code of Conduct is available free of charge in print to any stockholder who requests one by writing to Kenneth V. Handal, our Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, at the Company’s world headquarters in Islandia, New York at the address listed on the cover of this Exhibit.


Item 11.	Executive Compensation.

Reference is made to our definitive proxy statement, to be filed with the SEC, for information concerning executive compensation, which is incorporated herein by reference.


Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

Reference is made to our definitive proxy statement, to be filed with the SEC, for information concerning security ownership of each person known by us to own beneficially more than 5% of our outstanding shares of common stock, of each of our directors, and all executive officers and directors as a group, and equity compensation plan information, which is incorporated herein by reference.


Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.

Reference is made to our definitive proxy statement, to be filed with the SEC, for information concerning certain relationships and related transactions, which is incorporated herein by reference.


Item 14.	Principal Accounting Fees and Services.

Reference is made to our definitive proxy statement, to be filed with the SEC, for information concerning our independent auditors’ fees and services as well as our Audit and Compliance Committee’s policy on pre-approval of audit and permissible non-audit services of our independent auditors, which is incorporated herein by reference.

CA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
ISLANDIA, NEW YORK

EXHIBIT ITEM 8, ITEM 9A, ITEM 15(a)(1) AND (2), AND ITEM 15(c)

LIST OF UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

AS DESCRIBED IN THE EXPLANATORY NOTE AT THE BEGINNING OF THIS EXHIBIT, THE FOLLOWING UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND FOOTNOTES (PARTICULARLY WITH RESPECT TO REVENUE, TOTAL EXPENSE, NET INCOME, EARNINGS PER SHARE AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY) IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE DEPENDING ON THE FINDINGS OF OUR CURRENT REVIEW OF OPTION GRANT PRACTICES AND THE POTENTIAL RESTATEMENT OF OUR FINANCIAL STATEMENTS IN PRIOR PERIODS. REFER TO THE EXPLANATORY NOTE FOR IMPORTANT CAUTIONARY CONSIDERATIONS.

YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 2006

CA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)


	Year Ended March 31,
	2006			2005			2004
	(in millions, except
	per share amounts)

Revenue:
Subscription revenue	$	2,817		$	2,544		$	2,101
Maintenance		430			441			520
Software fees and other		163			254			331
Financing fees		45			77			134
Professional services		321			244			234

TOTAL REVENUE		3,776			3,560			3,320
Operating Expenses:
Amortization of capitalized software costs		449			447			463
Cost of professional services		272			229			224
Selling, general, and administrative		1,593			1,346			1,300
Product development and enhancements		696			704			693
Commissions, royalties and bonuses		387			339			267
Depreciation and amortization of other intangible assets		134			130			134
Other (gains) expenses, net		(15	)		(5	)		52
Restructuring and other		88			28			—
Charge for in-process research and development costs		18			—			—
Shareholder litigation and government investigation settlements		—			234			168

TOTAL EXPENSES BEFORE INTEREST AND TAXES		3,622			3,452			3,301
Income from continuing operations before interest and taxes		154			108			19
Interest expense, net		41			106			117

Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes		113			2			(98	)
Tax (benefit) expense		(23	)		4			(17	)

INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS		136			(2	)		(81	)
Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes		3			—			61
Adjustment to gain on disposal of discontinued operations, net of income taxes		—			(2	)		—

NET INCOME (LOSS)	$	139		$	(4	)	$	(20	)

BASIC INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
Income (loss) from continuing operations	$	0.23		$	(0.01	)	$	(0.14	)
Income from discontinued operations		0.01			0.00			0.11

Net income (loss)	$	0.24		$	(0.01	)	$	(0.03	)

Basic weighted average shares used in computation		581			588			580
DILUTED INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
Income (loss) from continuing operations	$	0.23		$	(0.01	)	$	(0.14	)
Income from discontinued operations		0.01			0.00			0.11

Net income (loss)	$	0.24		$	(0.01	)	$	(0.03	)

Diluted weighted average shares used in computation		608			588			580

See Accompanying Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.

CA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)


	March 31,
	2006			2005
	(dollars in millions)
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1,831		$	2,829
Marketable securities		34			296
Trade and installment accounts receivable, net		432			721
Federal and state income taxes receivable		—			55
Deferred income taxes		256			126
Other current assets		50			102

TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS		2,603			4,129
INSTALLMENT ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE, due after one year, net		449			595
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Land and buildings		488			594
Equipment, furniture, and improvements		1,066			917

		1,554			1,511
Accumulated depreciation and amortization		(920	)		(889	)

TOTAL PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, net		634			622
PURCHASED SOFTWARE PRODUCTS, net of accumulated amortization of $4,299 and $3,899, respectively		461			726
GOODWILL, net of accumulated amortization of $1,409 and $1,416, respectively		5,308			4,544
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES		130			130
OTHER NONCURRENT ASSETS		790			536

TOTAL ASSETS	$	10,375		$	11,282


LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Current portion of long-term debt and loans payable	$	1		$	826
Government investigation settlement		2			153
Accounts payable		411			177
Salaries, wages, and commissions		287			258
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities		373			370
Deferred subscription revenue (collected) — current		1,517			1,407
Deferred maintenance revenue		250			270
Taxes payable, other than income taxes payable		129			119
Federal, state, and foreign income taxes payable		372			342
Deferred income taxes		32			95

TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES		3,374			4,017
LONG-TERM DEBT, net of current portion		1,810			1,810
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES		46			187
DEFERRED SUBSCRIPTION REVENUE (COLLECTED) — NONCURRENT		448			273
OTHER NONCURRENT LIABILITIES		77			53

TOTAL LIABILITIES		5,755			6,340
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Preferred stock, no par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued
Common stock, $0.10 par value, 1,100,000,000 shares authorized, 630,920,596 shares issued		63			63
Additional paid-in capital		4,302			4,191
Retained earnings		1,883			1,837
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(134	)		(76	)
Unearned compensation		(6	)		(11	)
Treasury stock, at cost, of 59,167,446 and 43,933,590 shares, respectively		(1,488	)		(1,062	)

TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY		4,620			4,942

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY	$	10,375		$	11,282

See Accompanying Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.

CA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(Unaudited)


									Accumulated
			Additional						Other									Total
	Common		Paid-In			Retained			Comprehensive			Unearned			Treasury			Stockholders’
	Stock		Capital			Earnings			Loss			Compensation			Stock			Equity
	(in millions, except dividends declared per share)

Balance as of March 31, 2003	$	63	$	3,896		$	1,955		$	(215	)	$	—		$	(1,222	)	$	4,477
Net loss							(20	)											(20	)
Translation adjustment in 2004										104									104
Unrealized gain on marketable securities, net of taxes of $5										8									8

Comprehensive income																			92
Stock-based compensation				97															97
Income tax effect — stock transactions				(44	)														(44	)
Dividends declared ($0.08 per share)							(47	)											(47	)
Shareholder litigation settlement				11												39			50
Exercise of common stock options, ESPP, and other items, net of taxes of $6				(33	)											116			83
401(k) discretionary contribution				(13	)											34			21
Purchases of treasury stock																(56	)		(56	)
Reclassification of tax benefit associated with prior period stock options				159															159

Balance as of March 31, 2004		63		4,073			1,888			(103	)		—			(1,089	)		4,832
Net loss							(4	)											(4	)
Translation adjustment in 2005										36									36
Unrealized loss on marketable securities, net of taxes of $1										(2	)								(2	)
Reclassification adjustment included in net loss, net of taxes of $4										(7	)								(7	)

Comprehensive income																			23
Stock-based compensation				88															88
Income tax effect — stock transactions				(44	)														(44	)
Dividends declared... ($0.08 per share)							(47	)											(47	)
Shareholder litigation settlement				32												87			119
Exercise of common stock options, ESPP, and other items, net of taxes of $19				1												113			114
Issuance of options related to acquisitions, net of amortization				23									(11	)					12
401(k) discretionary contribution				3												16			19
Redemption of 5% Convertible Senior Notes				15												645			660
Exercise of call spread option																(673	)		(673	)
Purchases of treasury stock																(161	)		(161	)

Balance as of March 31, 2005		63		4,191			1,837			(76	)		(11	)		(1,062	)		4,942
Net income							139												139
Translation adjustment in 2006										(61	)								(61	)
Unrealized gain on marketable securities, net of taxes $1										3									3

Comprehensive income																			81
Stock-based compensation				93															93
Income tax effect — stock transactions				(4	)														(4	)
Dividends declared ($0.16) per share							(93	)											(93	)
Exercise of common stock options, ESPP, and other items, net of taxes of $19				(4	)											151			147
Issuance of options related to acquisitions, net of amortization				24									5						29
401(k) discretionary contribution				2												13			15
Purchases of treasury stock																(590	)		(590	)

Balance as of March 31, 2006	$	63	$	4,302		$	1,883		$	(134	)	$	(6	)	$	(1,488	)	$	4,620

See Accompanying Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.

CA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)


	Year Ended March 31,
	2006			2005			2004
	(in millions)

OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income (loss)	$	139		$	(4	)	$	(20	)
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax		3			—			61
Adjustment to gain on disposal of discontinued operations, net of tax		—			(2	)		—

Income (loss) from continuing operations		136			(2	)		(81	)
Adjustments to reconcile income (loss) from continuing operations to net cash provided by continuing operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		583			577			597
Provision for deferred income taxes		(344	)		(196	)		(292	)
Non-cash compensation expense related to stock and pension plans		96			104			120
Gain on asset divestitures		(7	)		—			(19	)
Non-cash charge for in-process research and development		18			—			—
Foreign currency transaction (gain) loss — before taxes		(9	)		8			41
Shareholder litigation settlement		—			16			158
Impairment charges for capitalized software		—			—			4
Changes in other operating assets and liabilities:
Decrease in trade and installment receivables, net — current		270			379			238
Decrease in noncurrent installment accounts receivable, net		164			210			464
Increase in deferred subscription revenue (collected) — current		149			164			220
Increase (decrease) in deferred subscription revenue (collected) — noncurrent		179			(8	)		92
Decrease in deferred maintenance revenue		(20	)		(27	)		(55	)
Increase in taxes payable, net		91			165			35
Restitution fund, net		(150	)		143			10
Restructuring and other, net		56			3			—
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other		101			(141	)		70
Changes in other operating assets and liabilities, excluding effects of acquisitions and divestitures		67			132			(323	)

NET CASH PROVIDED BY CONTINUING OPERATING ACTIVITIES		1,380			1,527			1,279
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Acquisitions, primarily goodwill, purchased software, and other intangible assets, net of cash acquired		(1,011	)		(469	)		(52	)
Settlements of purchase accounting liabilities		(37	)		(21	)		(19	)
Purchases of property and equipment		(143	)		(69	)		(30	)
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment		2			—			21
Proceeds from divestiture of assets		—			14			90
Proceeds from sale-leaseback transaction		75			—			—
Decrease (increase) in restricted cash		7			(9	)		(56	)
Purchases of marketable securities		(54	)		(390	)		(55	)
Sales of marketable securities		398			274			50
Capitalized software development costs		(84	)		(70	)		(44	)

NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES		(847	)		(740	)		(95	)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Dividends paid		(93	)		(47	)		(47	)
Purchases of treasury stock		(590	)		(161	)		(56	)
Debt borrowings		—			1,000			—
Debt repayments		(912	)		(4	)		(826	)
Debt issuance costs		—			(12	)		—
Exercise of call spread option		—			(673	)		—
Exercise of common stock options and other		127			99			78

NET CASH (USED IN) PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES		(1,468	)		202			(851	)
(DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS BEFORE EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH		(935	)		989			333
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash		(63	)		47			55

(DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		(998	)		1,036			388
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS — BEGINNING OF YEAR		2,829			1,793			1,405

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS — END OF YEAR	$	1,831		$	2,829		$	1,793

See Accompanying Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.


Note 1 —	Significant Accounting Policies

Description of Business: CA, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) designs, develops, markets, licenses, and supports a wide range of integrated management computer software products.

Principles of Consolidation: The Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Company and its majority-owned and controlled subsidiaries. Investments in affiliates owned 50% or less are accounted for by the equity method and include gross unconsolidated liabilities of approximately $2 million. Intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Companies acquired during each reporting period are reflected in the results for the Company effective from their respective dates of acquisition through the end of the reporting period (see Note 2, “Acquisitions, Divestitures, and Restructuring”).

Use of Estimates: The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (GAAP) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Although these estimates are based on management’s knowledge of current events and actions it may undertake in the future, these estimates may ultimately differ from actual results.

Translation of Foreign Currencies: Foreign currency assets and liabilities of the Company’s international subsidiaries are translated using the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date. Results of operations are translated using the average exchange rates prevailing throughout the year. The effects of exchange rate fluctuations on translating foreign currency assets and liabilities into U.S. dollars are accumulated as part of the foreign currency translation adjustment in Stockholders’ Equity. Gains and losses from foreign currency transactions are included in the “Other gains/expenses, net” line item on the Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations in the period in which they occur. Net income (loss) includes exchange transaction losses, net of taxes, of approximately $6 million, $5 million, and $26 million in the fiscal years ended March 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively.

Statements of Cash Flows: The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. Interest payments for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004 were $114 million, $120 million, and $137 million, respectively. Income taxes paid for these fiscal years were $207 million, $12 million (net of a tax refund of $191 million), and $423 million, respectively. The decrease in taxes paid during fiscal year 2005 was primarily attributable to a new Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Revenue Procedure, which grants taxpayers a twelve month deferral for cash received from customers to the extent such receipts were not recognized in revenue for financial statement purposes.

Basis of Revenue Recognition: The Company generates revenue from the following primary sources: (1) licensing software products; (2) providing customer technical support (referred to as maintenance); and (3) providing professional services, such as consulting and education.

The Company recognizes revenue pursuant to the requirements of Statement of Position (SOP) 97-2, “Software Revenue Recognition,” issued by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as amended by SOP 98-9 “Modification of SOP 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, With Respect to Certain Transactions.” In accordance with SOP 97-2, the Company begins to recognize revenue from licensing and supporting its software products when all of the following criteria are met: (1) the Company has evidence of an arrangement with a customer; (2) the Company delivers the products; (3) license agreement terms are deemed fixed or determinable and free of contingencies or uncertainties that may alter the agreement such that it may not be complete and final; and (4) collection is probable.

The Company’s software licenses generally do not include acceptance provisions. An acceptance provision allows a customer to test the software for a defined period of time before committing to license the software. If a license agreement includes an acceptance provision, the Company does not record deferred subscription revenue or recognize revenue until the earlier of the receipt of a written customer acceptance or, if not notified by the customer to cancel the license agreement, the expiration of the acceptance period.

Under the Company’s business model, software license agreements include flexible contractual provisions that, among other things, allow customers to receive unspecified future software upgrades for no additional fee. These

Note 1 — Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

agreements combine the right to use the software products with maintenance for the term of the agreement. Under these agreements, once all four of the above noted revenue recognition criteria are met, the Company is required to recognize revenue ratably over the term of the license agreement. For license agreements signed prior to October 2000 (the prior business model), once all four of the above noted revenue recognition criteria were met, software license fees were recognized as revenue up-front, and the maintenance fees were deferred and subsequently recognized as revenue over the term of the license.

Maintenance revenue is derived from two primary sources: (1) combined license and maintenance agreements recorded under the prior business model; and (2) stand-alone maintenance agreements.

Under the prior business model, maintenance and license fees were generally combined into a single license agreement. The maintenance portion was deferred and amortized into revenue over the initial license agreement term. Certain of these license agreements have not reached the end of their initial terms and, therefore, continue to amortize. This amortization is recorded to the “Maintenance” line item on the Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations. The deferred maintenance portion, which was optional to the customer, was determined using its fair value based on annual, fixed maintenance renewal rates stated in the agreement. For license agreements entered into under the Company’s current business model, maintenance and license fees continue to be combined; however, the maintenance is inclusive for the entire term of the arrangement. The Company reports such combined fees on the “Subscription revenue” line item on the Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations.

The Company also records stand-alone maintenance revenue earned from customers who elect optional maintenance. Revenue from such renewals is recognized on the “Maintenance” line item on the Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations over the term of the renewal agreement.

The “Deferred maintenance revenue” line item on the Company’s Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets principally represents payments received in advance of maintenance services rendered.

Revenue from professional service arrangements is generally recognized as the services are performed. Revenues from committed professional services arrangements that are sold as part of a software transaction are deferred and recognized on a ratable basis over the life of the related software transaction. If it is not probable that a project will be completed or the payment will be received, revenue is deferred until the uncertainty is removed.

Revenue from sales to distributors, resellers, and value-added resellers (VARs) is recognized when all four of the SOP 97-2 revenue recognition criteria noted above are met and when these entities sell the software product to their customers. This is commonly referred to as the sell-through method. Beginning July 1, 2004, a majority of sales of products to distributors, resellers and VARs incorporate the right for the end-users to receive certain unspecified future software upgrades and revenue from those contracts is therefore recognized on a ratable basis.

The Company has an established business practice of offering installment payment options to customers and has a history of successfully collecting substantially all amounts due under such agreements. The Company assesses collectibility based on a number of factors, including past transaction history with the customer and the creditworthiness of the customer. If, in the Company’s judgment, collection of a fee is not probable, revenue will not be recognized until the uncertainty is removed, which is generally through the receipt of cash payment.

The Company’s standard licensing agreements include a product warranty provision for all products. Such warranties are accounted for in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies.” The likelihood that the Company will be required to make refunds to customers under such provisions is considered remote.

Under the terms of substantially all of the Company’s license agreements, the Company has agreed to indemnify customers for costs and damages arising from claims against such customers based on, among other things, allegations that its software products infringe the intellectual property rights of a third party. In most cases, in the event of an infringement claim, the Company retains the right to (i) procure for the customer the right to continue using the software product; (ii) replace or modify the software product to eliminate the infringement while providing substantially equivalent functionality; or (iii) if neither (i) nor (ii) can be reasonably achieved, the Company may terminate the license agreement and refund to the customer a pro-rata portion of the fees paid. Such

Note 1 — Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

indemnification provisions are accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 5. The likelihood that the Company will be required to make refunds to customers under such provisions is considered remote. The indemnification is limited to the amount paid by the customer.

Subscription Revenue: Subscription revenue represents the ratable recognition of revenue attributable to license agreements under the Company’s business model.

Deferred subscription revenue represents the aggregate portion of all undiscounted contractual and committed license amounts pursuant to the Company’s business model for which customers have been billed but revenue is deferred and will be recognized ratably over the license agreement duration.

Software Fees and Other: Software fees and other revenue consists of revenue related to distribution and original equipment manufacturer (OEM) channel partners that have been recorded on an up-front sell-through basis, revenue associated with acquisitions prior to transition to our business model, joint ventures, royalty revenues, and other revenue. Revenue related to distribution partners and OEMs is sometimes referred to as “indirect” or “channel” revenue. In the second quarter of fiscal year 2005, the Company began offering more flexible license terms to the end-user customers of our channel partners, which necessitates the deferral of primarily all of the indirect revenue. The ratable recognition of this deferred revenue is reflected on the “Subscription revenue” line item on the Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Financing Fees: Accounts receivable resulting from prior business model product sales with extended payment terms were discounted to their present value at the then prevailing market rates. In subsequent periods, the accounts receivable are increased to the amounts due and payable by the customers through the accretion of financing revenue on the unpaid accounts receivable due in future years. Under the Company’s business model, additional unamortized discounts are no longer recorded, since the Company does not account for the present value of product sales as earned revenue at license agreement signing.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments: The following table provides information on the carrying amount and fair value of financial instruments. The carrying value of financial instruments classified as current assets and current liabilities, such as cash and cash equivalents, accounts payable, accrued expenses, and short-term debt, approximate fair value due to the short-term maturity of the instruments. The fair values of marketable securities and long-term debt, including current maturities, have been based on quoted market prices. See Note 3 “Marketable Securities” (unaudited), and Note 6 “Debt” (unaudited).


	March 31, 2006				March 31, 2005
			Estimated				Estimated
	Cost		Fair Value		Cost		Fair Value
	(in millions)

Assets
Marketable securities	$	30	$	34	$	298	$	297
Liabilities
Long-term debt, including current maturities	$	1,811	$	1,956	$	2,636	$	2,831

Concentration of Credit Risk: Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentration of credit risk consist primarily of marketable securities and accounts receivable. Amounts expected to be collected from customers, as disclosed in Note 5, “Trade and Installment Accounts Receivable,” (unaudited) have limited exposure to concentration of credit risk due to the diverse customer base and geographic areas covered by operations.

Marketable Securities: The Company has determined that all of its investment securities should be classified as available-for-sale. Available-for-sale securities are carried at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses reported in Stockholders’ Equity under the caption “Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss” (unaudited). The amortized cost of debt securities is adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts to maturity. Such amortization and accretion is included in the “Interest expense, net” line item on the Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations. Realized gains and losses and declines in value judged to be other than temporary on available-for-sale securities are included in the “Selling, general, and administrative” (SG&A) line item on the Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations. The cost of securities sold is based on the specific identification method. Interest

Note 1 — Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

and dividends on securities classified as available-for-sale are included in the “Interest expense, net” line item on the Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Restricted Cash: The Company’s insurance subsidiary requires a minimum restricted cash balance of $50 million. In addition, the Company has other restricted cash balances, including cash collateral for letters of credit. The total amount of restricted cash as of March 31, 2006 and 2005 was $60 million and $67 million, respectively, and is included in the “Other noncurrent assets” line item on the Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Property and Equipment: Land, buildings, equipment, furniture, and improvements are stated at cost. Depreciation and amortization are provided over the estimated useful lives of the assets by the straight-line method. Building and improvements are estimated to have 10- to 40-year lives, and the remaining property and equipment are estimated to have 5- to 7-year lives. Depreciation expense for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004 was approximately $83 million, $89 million and $97 million, respectively.

Goodwill: Goodwill represents the excess of the aggregate purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets and in-process research and development acquired by the Company in a purchase business combination. Goodwill is not amortized into results of operations but instead is reviewed for impairment. During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2006, the Company performed its annual impairment review of goodwill and concluded that there was no impairment in the current fiscal year. Similar impairment reviews were performed during the fourth quarter of fiscal years 2005 and 2004. The Company concluded that there was no impairment to be recorded in these fiscal years.

The carrying value of goodwill was $5.31 billion and $4.54 billion as of March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. During fiscal year 2006, goodwill increased approximately $764 million due primarily to the acquisitions of Concord Communications, Inc (Concord), Niku Corporation (Niku), iLumin Software Services, Inc. (iLumin) and Wily Technology, Inc. (Wily). For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006, goodwill increased by approximately $345 million, $226 million, $36 million and $232 million principally as a result of the Company’s acquisitions of Concord, Niku, iLumin and Wily, respectively. The goodwill balances for Concord and Niku were subsequently increased (decreased) by approximately $12 million and ($83) million, respectively, in order to adjust balances based on revisions to the purchase price allocations after the acquisition date. Goodwill was also recorded and adjusted for smaller acquisitions made this fiscal year of approximately $7 million. Goodwill associated with prior fiscal year acquisitions was reduced by approximately $3 million. Goodwill was also reduced by $8 million for the sale of Multigen-Paradigm, Inc.

The carrying value of goodwill was $4.54 billion and $4.37 billion as of March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. During fiscal year 2005, goodwill increased approximately $271 million due primarily to the acquisition of Netegrity, Inc. and Pest Patrol, Inc. This increase was reduced by approximately $96 million due to adjustments to net operating losses, adjustments to anticipated future tax benefits, and adjustments to other acquisition reserves related to the acquisitions of Platinum Technology International, Inc. and Sterling Software, Inc.

Capitalized Software Costs and Other Identified Intangible Assets: Capitalized software costs include the fair value of rights to market software products acquired in purchase business combinations (Purchased Software Products). In allocating the purchase price to the assets acquired in a purchase business combination, the Company allocates a portion of the purchase price equal to the fair value at the acquisition date of the rights to market the software products of the acquired company. The purchase price of Purchased Software Products is capitalized and amortized over the estimated useful life of such products over a period not exceeding eight years. In connection with the acquisition of Concord in June 2005, Niku in July 2005, iLumin in October 2005, and Wily in March 2006 the Company capitalized approximately $18 million, $23 million, $2 million, and $54 million of purchased software, respectively. In addition, the Company recorded approximately $38 million of purchase software costs related to smaller acquisitions during fiscal year 2006.

In accordance with SFAS No. 86, “Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software to be Sold, Leased, or Otherwise Marketed,” internally generated software development costs associated with new products and significant enhancements to existing software products are expensed as incurred until technological feasibility has been established. Internally generated software development costs of $84 million, $70 million, and $44 million were

Note 1 — Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

capitalized during fiscal years 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively. The Company recorded amortization of $48 million, $41 million, and $40 million for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively, which also was included in the “Amortization of capitalized software costs” line item on the Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations. Unamortized, internally generated software development costs included in the “Other noncurrent assets” line item on the Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2006 and 2005 were $195 million and $164 million, respectively. Annual amortization of capitalized software costs is the greater of the amount computed using the straight-line method over the remaining estimated economic life of the software product, generally estimated to be five years from the date the product reached technological feasibility. The Company amortized capitalized software costs using the straight-line method in fiscal years 2006, 2005, and 2004, as anticipated future revenue is projected to increase for several years considering the Company is continuously integrating current software technology into new software products.

Other identified intangible assets include both customer relationships and trademarks/trade names.

In connection with the acquisition of Concord, Niku, iLumin, and Wily in fiscal year 2006, the Company recognized approximately $22 million, $44 million, $21 million and $126 million, respectively of customer relationships and trademarks/trade names. In connection with the acquisition of Netegrity in fiscal year 2005, the Company recognized approximately $45 million and $26 million of customer relationships and trademarks/trade names, respectively.

In accordance with SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and other Intangible Assets”, certain identified intangible assets with indefinite lives are not subject to amortization. The balance of such assets at March 31, 2006 was $26 million. The Company amortizes all other identified intangible assets over their remaining economic lives, estimated to be between six and twelve years. The Company recorded amortization of other identified intangible assets of $51 million, $40 million and $39 million in the fiscal years ended March 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The net carrying value of other identified intangible assets as of March 31, 2006 and 2005 was $388 million and $226 million, respectively, and was included in the “Other noncurrent assets” line item on the Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The gross carrying amounts and accumulated amortization for identified intangible assets are as follows:


	At March 31, 2006
	Gross		Accumulated		Net
	Assets		Amortization		Assets
	(in millions)

Capitalized software:
Purchased	$	4,760	$	4,299	$	461
Internally developed		558		363		195
Other identified intangible assets subject to amortization		628		266		362
Other identified intangible assets not subject to amortization		26		—		26

Total	$	5,972	$	4,928	$	1,044


	At March 31, 2005
	Gross		Accumulated		Net
	Assets		Amortization		Assets
	(in millions)

Capitalized software:
Purchased	$	4,625	$	3,899	$	726
Internally developed		494		330		164
Other identified intangible assets subject to amortization		415		215		200
Other identified intangible assets not subject to amortization		26		—		26

Total	$	5,560	$	4,444	$	1,116

Note 1 — Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Based on the identified intangible assets recorded through March 31, 2006, the annual amortization expense over the next five fiscal years is expected to be as follows:


	Year Ended March 31,
	2007		2008		2009		2010		2011
	(in millions)

Capitalized software:
Purchased	$	296	$	52	$	41	$	29	$	18
Internally developed		53		47		39		32		20
Other identified intangible assets subject to amortization		50		50		50		50		50

Total	$	399	$	149	$	130	$	111	$	88

Accounting for Long-Lived Assets: The carrying values of purchased software products, other intangible assets, and other long-lived assets, including investments, are reviewed on a regular basis for the existence of facts or circumstances, both internally and externally, that may suggest impairment. If an impairment is deemed to exist, any related impairment loss is calculated based on net realizable value for capitalized software and fair value for all other intangibles.

Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation: Effective April 1, 2005, the Company adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (SFAS No. 123(R)), which establishes accounting for stock-based awards exchanged for employee services. Under the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R), stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date, based on the calculated fair value of the award, and is recognized as an expense over the employee requisite service period (generally the vesting period of the equity grant).

Sales Commissions: Sales commissions are recognized in the period earned by employees, which is typically upon the signing of the contract. The Company accrues for sales commissions based on, among other things, estimates of how our sales personnel will perform against specified annual sales quotas. These estimates involve assumptions regarding the Company’s projected new product sales and billings. All of these assumptions reflect our best estimates, but these items involve uncertainties, and as a result, if other assumptions had been used in the current period, sales commission compensation expense could have been impacted. Under our current sales compensation model, during periods of high billings growth relative to revenue in that period, the amount of sales commission expense attributable to the license agreement would be recognized fully in the year and could negatively impact income and earnings per share in that period.

Derivative Financial Instruments: Derivatives are accounted for in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“SFAS 133”). For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006, we entered into derivative contracts with a total notional value of 280 million euros. Derivatives with a notional value of 80 million euros were entered into with the intent of mitigating a certain portion of our euro operating exposure and are part of the Company’s on-going risk management program. Derivatives with a notional value of 200 million euros were entered into during March 2006 with the intent of mitigating a certain portion of the foreign exchange variability associated with the Company’s repatriation of approximately $584 million from its foreign subsidiaries. Hedge accounting under SFAS 133 was not applied to any of the derivatives entered into during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006. The resulting gain of approximately $1 million for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2006 is included in the “Other (gains) losses, net” line on the Unaudited Consolidated Statement of Operations. As of March 31, 2006, there were no derivative contracts outstanding.

Comprehensive Income (Loss): Comprehensive income (loss) includes net income (loss), foreign currency translation adjustments and unrealized gains (losses) on the Company’s available-for-sale securities. As of March 31, 2006 and 2005, the accumulated comprehensive income (loss) included foreign currency translation losses of $136 million and $75 million, respectively. Accumulated comprehensive loss also includes an unrealized gain on equity securities, net of tax, of $2 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 and an unrealized loss on equity securities, net of tax, of less than $1 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005. The components of

Note 1 — Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

comprehensive income (loss), net of applicable tax, for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004, are included within the Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity.

Net Income (Loss) From Continuing Operations per Share: Basic and dilutive income (loss) per share from continuing operations are computed by dividing net loss by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period.


	Year Ended March 31,
	2006		2005			2004
	(in millions, except per share amounts)

Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of taxes	$	136	$	(2	)	$	(81	)
Interest expense associated with the Convertible Senior Notes, net of tax(1)		5		—			—

Numerator in calculation of diluted Income (loss) per share	$	141	$	(2	)	$	(81	)

Weighted average shares outstanding and common share equivalents
Weighted average common shares outstanding		581		588			580
Weighted average Convertible Senior Note shares outstanding		23		—			—
Weighted average awards outstanding		4		—			—

Denominator in calculation of diluted earnings Income (loss) per share		608		588			580

Diluted income (loss) per share from continuing operations(2)	$	0.23	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.14	)


(1)		If the common share equivalents for the 5% Convertible Senior Notes (27 million shares) issued in March 2002 and the 1.625% Convertible Senior Notes (23 million shares) issued in December 2002 (collectively, the Notes) had been dilutive, interest expense, net of tax, related to the Notes would have been added back to income from continuing operations to calculate diluted earnings per share from continuing operations. The related interest expense, net of tax, for each of the fiscal years ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 totaled approximately $25 million.

(2)		If all common share equivalents for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 had been dilutive, the weighted average shares outstanding and common share equivalents would have been 640 million and 634 million, respectively.

Reclassifications: Certain prior year balances have been reclassified to conform with the current year’s presentation.

Approximately $47 million of “Unearned professional services”, a component of “Trade and installment accounts receivable, net” at March 31, 2005 has been reclassified to “Accrued expenses and other current liabilities” on the Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheet to conform to the March 31, 2006 presentation.

Approximately $270 million associated with deferred maintenance revenue was reclassified from “Non-current liabilities” to “Current liabilities” to conform to the March 31, 2006 presentation. The reclassification was made since these amounts are expected to be recognized as revenue within twelve months of the reporting date. This amount is reflected as a separate line item in the Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Approximately $10 million of professional services related receivables were reclassified for the period ended March 31, 2005 from “Billed accounts receivable,” to “Other Receivables” to conform to the March 31, 2006 presentation. Both are components of “Trade and installment accounts receivable, net” shown on the Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheet. See Note 5, — “Trade and Installment Account Receivable”. There was no impact to net accounts receivable, current or non-current, due to this reclassification.

A reclassification was made to increase the accounts receivable balance by $20 million ($2 million current and $18 million non-current) and the allowance for doubtful accounts by $20 million ($2 million current and $18 million non-current). The reclassification was made to adjust the presentation of a valuation reserve that had previously

Note 1 — Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

been netted against the gross accounts receivable. See Note 5 — “Trade and Installment Account Receivable”, and in Schedule II, “Valuation and Qualifying Accounts”. There was no impact to net accounts receivable, current or non-current, due to this reclassification.

A reclassification entry was made to increase deferred tax assets — current and non-current by $47 million and $25 million, respectively, and to increase deferred tax liabilities — current and noncurrent by $6 million and $66 million respectively, to conform to the March 31, 2006 presentation. The reclassification was made to better reflect the gross deferred tax assets and liabilities by taxing jurisdiction.

Note 2 — Acquisitions, Divestitures and Restructuring

Acquisitions

During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2006, the Company completed its acquisition of Wily. Wily is a provider of enterprise application management software solutions that enable companies to manage their web applications and infrastructure. The total purchase price of the acquisition was approximately $374 million which included a holdback of approximately 10% of the initial purchase price. The acquisition of Wily has been accounted for as a purchase and accordingly, its results of operations have been included in the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements since the date of its acquisition, March 3, 2006 (Wily Acquisition Date).

The acquisition cost of Wily has been allocated to assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on estimated fair values at the date of acquisition as follows:


	(in millions)

Cash and cash equivalents	$	13
Purchased software		54
Deferred tax assets		34
Other assets assumed		8
Other intangibles — customer relationships		119
Other intangibles — tradenames		7
Goodwill		232
Deferred tax liabilities		(74	)
Deferred revenue		(10	)
Other liabilities assumed		(9	)

Purchase price	$	374

Purchased software products are being amortized over an estimated life of eight years, and customer relationships and tradenames will be amortized over ten years.

The allocation of the purchase price is based upon estimates which may be revised within one year of the date of acquisition as additional information becomes available. It is anticipated that the final purchase price allocation will not differ materially from the preliminary allocation presented above.

The allocation of a significant portion of the Wily purchase price to goodwill was predominantly due to the relatively short lives of the acquired developed technology assets, whereby a substantial amount of the purchase price was based on earnings beyond the estimated lives of the intangible assets.

During the third quarter of fiscal year 2006, the Company completed its acquisition of iLumin. Total purchase price of the acquisition was approximately $48 million. iLumin was a privately held provider of enterprise message management and archiving software. iLumin’s Assentor product line has been added to the Company’s storage management business unit. The acquisition of iLumin has been accounted for as a purchase and accordingly, its results of operations have been included in the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements since the date of its acquisition, October 14, 2005 (the iLumin Acquisition Date).

Note 2 — Acquisitions, Divestitures and Restructuring (Continued)

The acquisition cost of iLumin has been allocated to assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on estimated fair values at the date of acquisition as follows:


	(in millions)

Purchased software products	$	2
Other assets		4
Customer relationships		21
Goodwill		36
Deferred tax liability		(9	)
Other liabilities assumed		(6	)

Purchase price	$	48

Purchased software products are being amortized over an estimated life of seven years, and customer relationships will be amortized over ten years.

The allocation of a significant portion of the iLumin purchase price to goodwill was predominantly due to the relatively short lives of the acquired developed technology assets, whereby a substantial amount of the purchase price was based on earnings beyond the estimated lives of the intangible assets.

During the second quarter of fiscal year 2006, the Company acquired the common stock of Niku, including its information technology governance (ITG) solution, for approximately $337 million. In addition, the Company converted options to acquire the common stock of Niku and incurred acquisition costs of approximately $5 million and $3 million, respectively, for an aggregate purchase price of $345 million. Niku was a provider of information technology management and governance (IT-MG) solutions, and the Company is in the process of integrating Niku’s ITG solutions with the Business Service Optimization (BSO) unit. The acquisition of Niku has been accounted for as a purchase and accordingly, its results of operations have been included in the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements since the date of its acquisition, July 29, 2005 (the Niku Acquisition Date).

The acquisition cost of Niku has been allocated to assets acquired, liabilities assumed and in-process research and development based on estimated fair values as follows:


	(in millions)

Cash	$	44
Marketable securities		19
Deferred taxes assets		102
Other assets acquired		20
Purchased software products		23
In-process research and development		14
Customer relationships		42
Trademarks/tradenames		2
Goodwill		143
Deferred revenue		(4	)
Deferred tax liabilities		(28	)
Other liabilities assumed		(32	)

Purchase price	$	345

Note 2 — Acquisitions, Divestitures and Restructuring (Continued)

Approximately $14 million of the purchase price represents the estimated fair value of projects that, as of the Niku Acquisition Date, had not reached technological feasibility and had no alternative future use. Accordingly, this amount was immediately expensed and has been included in the “Charge for in-process research and development costs” line item on the Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Purchased software products are being amortized over approximately five years, trademarks/tradenames will be amortized over seven years, and customer relationships will be amortized over eight years.

The allocation of a significant portion of the Niku purchase price to goodwill was predominantly due to the relatively short lives of the acquired developed technology assets, whereby a substantial amount of the purchase price was based on earnings beyond the estimated lives of the intangible assets.

Based upon additional information received subsequent to the Niku Acquisition Date, goodwill was adjusted downward by approximately $83 million as of March 31, 2006, primarily due to the recognition of deferred tax assets associated with acquired net operating losses (NOLs). This adjustment has been included in the allocation presented above.

The following unaudited pro-forma financial information presents the combined results of operations of the Company, Wily, iLumin and Niku as if the acquisitions had occurred at April 1, 2004. The historical results of the Company for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 include the results of Wily, iLumin and Niku from their respective acquisition dates. The pro-forma results presented below for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 combine the results of the Company for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 and the historical results of Wily, iLumin and Niku for their comparable reporting periods. The pro-forma results for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005 combine the historical results of the Company for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005 with the combined historical results for the comparable reporting periods for Wily, iLumin and Niku. The unaudited pro-forma financial information is not intended to represent or be indicative of the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial condition that would have been reported had the acquisitions of Wily, iLumin and Niku been completed as of the beginning of the periods presented and should not be taken as indicative of the Company’s future consolidated results of operations or financial condition. Pro-forma adjustments are tax-effected at the Company’s statutory tax rate.


	For the Year Ended March 31,
	2006		2005
	unaudited
	(in millions)

Revenue	$	3,860	$	3,668
Income (loss) from continuing operations		89		(57	)
Net income (loss)		92		(57	)

Basic earnings (loss) per share:
Income (loss) from continuing operations	$	0.15	$	(0.10	)
Discontinued operations		0.01		—

Net income (loss)	$	0.16	$	(0.10	)


Diluted earnings (loss) per share:
Income (loss) from continuing operations	$	0.14	$	(0.10	)
Discontinued operations		0.01		—

Net income (loss)	$	0.15	$	(0.10	)

Note 2 — Acquisitions, Divestitures and Restructuring (Continued)

During the first quarter of fiscal year 2006, the Company acquired the common stock of Concord, including its Aprisma Management Technologies subsidiary, for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $359 million. The Company converted options to acquire the common stock of Concord and incurred acquisition costs of approximately $15 million and $7 million, respectively. Concord was a provider of network service management software solutions, and the Company is in the process of making Concord’s network management products available both as independent products and as integrated components of the Company’s Unicenter Enterprise Systems Management suite. The acquisition of Concord has been accounted for as a purchase and, accordingly, its results of operations have been included in the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements since the date of its acquisition, June 7, 2005 (the Concord Acquisition Date). The pro-forma results shown above do not include the results of Concord as Concord was not considered a significant subsidiary at the time of acquisition.

The acquisition cost of Concord has been allocated to assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and in-process research and development based on estimated fair values as follows:


	(in millions)

Cash	$	18
Marketable securities		58
Deferred tax assets		27
Other assets acquired		44
Purchased software products		18
In-process research and development		4
Customer relationships		19
Trademarks/tradenames		3
Goodwill		357
Deferred revenue		(19	)
Deferred tax liabilities		(25	)
3% convertible notes payable		(86	)
Other liabilities assumed		(59	)

Purchase price	$	359

Approximately $4 million of the purchase price represents the estimated fair value of projects that, as of Concord Acquisition Date, had not reached technological feasibility and had no alternative future use. Accordingly, this amount was immediately expensed and has been included in the “Charge for in-process research and development costs” line item on the Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Purchased software products are being amortized over five years, trademarks/tradenames are being amortized over six years, and customer relationships will be amortized over seven years.

The allocation of a significant portion of the Concord purchase price to goodwill was predominantly due to the relatively short lives of the developed technology assets; whereby a substantial amount of the purchase price was based on earnings beyond the estimated lives of the intangible assets.

Based upon additional information received subsequent to the Concord Acquisition Date, net liabilities assumed and goodwill were both increased by approximately $12 million. This adjustment has been included in the allocation presented above.

In connection with the acquisition of Concord, the Company assumed $86 million in 3% convertible senior notes payable due 2023. In accordance with the notes’ terms, the Company paid off the notes in full in July 2005.

Note 2 — Acquisitions, Divestitures and Restructuring (Continued)

In November 2004, the Company acquired the common stock of Netegrity, Inc. (Netegrity) for an aggregate purchase price approximately $455 million. The Company converted employee stock options to acquire the common stock of Netegrity to employee stock options to acquire shares of the Company at a cost of approximately $11 million for vested options and incurred acquisition costs of approximately $5 million. Netegrity was a provider of business security software, principally in the areas of access and identity management. The Company has made Netegrity’s identity and access management solutions available both as independent products and as integrated components of the Company’s eTrust Identity and Access Management Suite. The acquisition of Netegrity has been accounted for as a purchase and, accordingly, its results of operations have been included in the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements since the date of its acquisition, November 24, 2004. The acquisition cost of Netegrity has been allocated to assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on estimated fair values at the date of acquisition as follows:


	(in millions)

Cash and marketable securities	$	97
Deferred income taxes, net		4
Purchased software products		37
Customer relationships		45
Trademarks/tradenames		26
Goodwill		258
Liabilities assumed, net		(12	)

Purchase price	$	455

Purchased software products and customer relationships are being amortized over seven years and twelve years, respectively.

In August 2004, the Company acquired PestPatrol, Inc., a privately held provider of anti-spyware and security solutions for approximately $40 million. The products acquired in this transaction were integrated into the Company’s eTrust Threat Management software product portfolio. This portfolio protects organizations from diverse Internet dangers such as viruses, spam, and inappropriate use of the Web by employees.

Accrued acquisition-related costs and changes in these accruals, including additions related to the Company’s acquisitions of Wily, iLumin, Niku, Concord and Netegrity were as follows:


	Duplicate
	Facilities and			Employee
	Other Costs			Costs
	(in millions)

Balance as of March 31, 2004	$	58		$	12
Additions		8			3
Settlements		(15	)		(6	)
Adjustments		(10	)		—

Balance as of March 31, 2005	$	41		$	9
Additions		31			61
Settlements		(18	)		(18	)
Adjustments		6			—

Balance as of March 31, 2006	$	60		$	52

The liabilities for duplicate facilities and other costs relate to operating leases, which are actively being renegotiated and expire at various times through 2010, negotiated buyouts of the operating lease commitments, and other contractually related liabilities. The liabilities for employee costs relate to involuntary termination benefits. Adjustments, which reduce the corresponding liability and related goodwill accounts, are recorded when

Note 2 — Acquisitions, Divestitures and Restructuring (Continued)

obligations are settled at amounts less than those originally estimated. The remaining liability balances are included in the “Accrued expenses and other liabilities” line item on the Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Divestitures: In December 2005, the Company sold its wholly-owned subsidiary MultiGen-Paradigm, Inc. (MultiGen) to Parallax Capital Partners. MultiGen was a provider of real-time, end-to-end 3D solutions for visualizations, simulations and training applications used for both civilian and government purposes. The sale price was approximately $6 million, which included reimbursements for certain employee-related costs. The sale price was received in the form of an interest bearing note receivable that is scheduled to be paid by June 2007. MultiGen had revenues of $9 million and $11 million for the nine month periods ending December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively. As a result of the sale in the third quarter, the Company recorded a $3 million gain, net of a tax benefit of approximately $10 million. The Company has separately presented the gain on the disposal of MultiGen as a discontinued operation for the current period presented. The impact of MultiGen’s results on prior periods was considered immaterial.

In March 2004, the Company sold its approximate 90% interests in ACCPAC to The Sage Group, plc. (Sage). The Company’s net proceeds totaled approximately $104 million for all of the Company’s outstanding equity interests of ACCPAC, including options and change of control payments for certain ACCPAC officers and managers. The Company received approximately $90 million of the net proceeds in fiscal year 2004 and the remainder in fiscal year 2005. ACCPAC provided accounting, customer relationship management, human resources, warehouse management, manufacturing, electronic data interchange, and point-of-sale software for small and medium-sized businesses. As a result of the sale in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2004, the Company realized a gain of approximately $60 million, net of taxes of approximately $36 million, in fiscal year 2004. In the second quarter of fiscal year 2005, the Company recorded an adjustment to the gain of approximately $2 million, net of tax of approximately $1 million, that reduced the net gain to approximately $58 million. Approximately 600 employees were transferred to Sage. The sale completed the Company’s multi-year effort to exit the business applications market. Pursuant to SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” the historical results of operations of ACCPAC, including the gain on the sale in fiscal year 2004, and the adjustment to the gain in fiscal year 2005, have been recorded as discontinued operations for all periods presented.

The operating results of ACCPAC are summarized as follows:


	Year Ended
	March 31,
	2004(1)
	(in millions)

Software fees and other	$	38
Maintenance		40

Total revenue	$	78

Pre-tax income from discontinued operation	$	1
Income from discontinued operation, net of taxes	$	1


(1)		Fiscal year 2004 includes operating results through December 2003, the measurement date for the ACCPAC sale.

Other:

In December 2005, the Company acquired certain assets and liabilities of Control F-1 for a total purchase price of approximately $14 million which was paid in January 2006. Control F-1 was a privately held provider of support automation solutions that automatically prevent, detect, and repair end-user computer problems before they disrupt critical IT services.

In November 2005, the Company announced an agreement with Garnett & Helfrich Capital, a private equity firm, to create an independent corporate entity, Ingres Corporation (“Ingres”). As part of the agreement, the Company contributed intellectual property, support contracts, services of certain employees and other assets used exclusively

Note 2 — Acquisitions, Divestitures and Restructuring (Continued)

in the business of the intellectual property contributed. The contributions from the Company and Garnett & Helfrich Capital, L.P., formed Ingres. The Company has a 25% ownership interest in the newly formed entity, in which it received an equity stake of $15 million. As a result of the transaction, the Company recorded a non-cash pre-tax gain for the three months ended December 31, 2005 of approximately $7 million due to the value of assets that were contributed during the formation of Ingres in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 01-2 Interpretations of APB Opinion No. 29. The gain is recorded as “Other (gains) losses, net” in the Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Restructuring

In July 2005, the Company announced a restructuring plan to increase efficiency and productivity and to more closely align its investments with strategic growth opportunities. The Company accounted for the individual components of the restructuring plan as follows:

Severance: The plan includes a workforce reduction of approximately five percent or 800 positions worldwide. The termination benefits the Company has offered in connection with this workforce reduction are substantially the same as the benefits the Company has provided historically for non-performance-based workforce reductions, and in certain countries have been provided based upon statutory minimum requirements. Accordingly, the employee termination obligations incurred in connection with the restructuring plan did not meet the definition of a “one-time benefit arrangement” under SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities” (SFAS 146) and the Company therefore accounted for such obligations in accordance with SFAS No. 112, “Employers’ Accounting for Post Employment Benefits, an Amendment of FASB Statements No. 5 and 43.” In certain countries, the company elected to provide termination benefits in excess of legal requirements subsequent to the initial implementation of the plan. These additional costs have been recognized as incurred in accordance with SFAS 146. The Company incurred approximately $36 million of severance costs for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006. The Company anticipates the severance portion of the restructuring plan will cost approximately $45 million and anticipates that the remaining amount will be incurred by the end of the fiscal year 2007. Final payment of these amounts is dependent upon settlement with the works councils in certain international locations and our ability to negotiate lease terminations.

Facilities Abandonment: The Company recorded the costs associated with lease termination and/or abandonment when the Company ceased to utilize the leased property. Under SFAS 146, the liability associated with lease termination and/or abandonment is measured as the present value of the total remaining lease costs and associated operating costs, less probable sublease income. The Company incurred approximately $30 million of facilities abandonment related costs for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006. The Company will accrete its obligations related to the facilities abandonment to the then-present value and, accordingly, will recognize accretion expense as a restructuring expense in future periods. The Company anticipates the facilities abandonment portion of the restructuring plan will cost up to a total of $40 million, and anticipates that the remaining amount will be incurred by the end of the fiscal year 2007.

Accrued restructuring costs and changes in these accruals for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 were as follows:


				Facilities
	Severance			Abandonment
	(in millions)

Balance at March 31, 2005	$	—		$	—
Additions		36			30
Payments		(19	)		(3	)
Adjustments		1			—

Balance at March 31, 2006	$	18		$	27

The liability balance is included in “Accrued expenses and other current liabilities” on the Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheet at March 31, 2006.

Note 2 — Acquisitions, Divestitures and Restructuring (Continued)

As part of its restructuring initiatives and associated review of the benefits of owning versus leasing certain properties, the Company also entered into three sale/leaseback transactions during the second half of fiscal year 2006. Two of these transactions resulted in a loss totaling approximately $7 million which was recorded under “Restructuring and other” in the Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations. The third sale/leaseback transaction resulted in a gain of approximately $5 million which will be recognized ratably as a reduction to rent expense over the life of the lease term. The lease terms of the agreements expire between 2007 and 2015 and represent a total lease commitment of approximately $32 million. All of these transactions were recorded in accordance with SFAS 28, “Accounting for Sales with Leasebacks — an amendment of FASB Statement No. 13”.

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006, the Company incurred approximately $15 million in connection with certain DPA related costs and for the termination of a non-core application development professional services project (see also note 7, “Commitments and Contingencies”).

In September 2004, the Company announced a restructuring plan that included a workforce reduction of approximately five percent or 750 positions worldwide. In connection with the restructuring plan, the Company recorded a charge of approximately $28 million primarily associated with termination benefits in the second quarter of fiscal year 2005. The Company does not expect to incur additional charges related to this restructuring plan. As of March 31, 2005, the Company had made all payments under the plan.

Note 3 — Marketable Securities

The following is a summary of marketable securities classified as available-for-sale:


	Year Ended March 31,
		2006		2005
	(in millions)

Debt/Equity Securities:
Cost		$	30	$	298
Gross unrealized gains			4		—
Gross unrealized losses			—		(1	)

Estimated fair value		$	34	$	297

Approximately $1 million of marketable securities were restricted as to use for other than current operations at March 31, 2005 and was included in the “Other noncurrent assets” line item on the Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheet. There were no marketable securities that were considered restricted as of March 31, 2006.

The Company realized gains on sales of marketable securities of approximately $2 million and $8 million for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

Interest income for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004 was approximately $57 million, $50 million, and $22 million, respectively, and was included in the “Interest expense, net” line item on the Unaudited Consolidated Statement of Operations.

In March 2005, the Company sold its remaining interest in Viewpoint Corporation (Viewpoint), in a private sale for $12 million, net of fees. As a result of the sale, the Company reported an $8 million gain that is included in the “Selling, general, and administrative” line item in the Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations. At the time of the sale, the Company controlled more than 5% of Viewpoint’s outstanding common stock.

The estimated fair value of debt and equity securities is based upon published closing prices of those securities as of March 31, 2006. For debt securities, amortized cost is classified by contractual maturity. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because the issuers of the securities may have the right to prepay obligations without prepayment penalties.

The Company reviewed its investment portfolio for impairment and determined that, as of March 31, 2006, the total unrealized loss for investments impaired for both greater and less than 12 months was immaterial. See also Note 1, “Significant Accounting Policies.”

Note 4 — Segment and Geographic Information (Continued)

In addition to its United States operations, the Company operates through branches and wholly owned subsidiaries in 46 foreign countries located in North America (3), Africa (1), South America (6), Asia/Pacific (16), and Europe (20). Revenue is allocated to a geographic area based on the location of the sale. The following table presents information about the Company by geographic area for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004:


	United
	States		Europe		Other		Eliminations			Total

(in millions)
March 31, 2006
Revenue
To unaffiliated customers	$	1,992	$	1,120	$	664	$	—		$	3,776
Between geographic areas(1)		459		—		—		(459	)		—

Total Revenue	$	2,451	$	1,120	$	664	$	(459	)	$	3,776
Property and equipment, net	$	428	$	166	$	40	$	—		$	634
Identifiable assets		8,685		1,396		294		—			10,375
Total liabilities	$	4,300	$	938	$	517	$	—		$	5,755

March 31, 2005
Revenue
To unaffiliated customers	$	1,838	$	1,094	$	628	$	—		$	3,560
Between geographic areas(1)		472		—		—		(472	)		—

Total Revenue	$	2,310	$	1,094	$	628	$	(472	)	$	3,560
Property and equipment, net	$	404	$	184	$	34	$	—		$	622
Identifiable assets		9,755		1,135		392		—			11,282
Total liabilities	$	5,049	$	894	$	397	$	—		$	6,340

March 31, 2004
Revenue:
To unaffiliated customers	$	1,755	$	998	$	567	$	—		$	3,320
Between geographic areas(1)		502		—		—		(502	)		—

Total Revenue	$	2,257	$	998	$	567	$	(502	)	$	3,320
Property and equipment, net	$	430	$	182	$	29	$	—		$	641
Identifiable assets		9,326		1,054		380		—			10,760
Total liabilities	$	4,925	$	504	$	499	$	—		$	5,928


(1)		Represents royalties from foreign subsidiaries determined as a percentage of certain amounts invoiced to customers.

No single customer accounted for 10% or more of total revenue for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2006, 2005, or 2004.


Note 5 —	Trade and Installment Accounts Receivable

The Company uses installment license agreements as a standard business practice and has a history of successfully collecting substantially all amounts due under the original payment terms without making concessions on payments, software products, maintenance, or professional services. Net trade and installment accounts receivable represent financial assets derived from the committed amounts due from the Company’s customers that have been earned by the Company. These accounts receivable balances are reflected net of unamortized discounts based on imputed interest for the time value of money for license agreements under our prior business model, unearned revenue attributable to maintenance, unearned professional services contracted for in the license agreement, and


Note 5 —	Trade and Installment Accounts Receivable (Continued)

allowances for doubtful accounts. These balances do not include unbilled contractual commitments executed under the Company’s current business model. Such committed amounts are summarized in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. Trade and Installment Accounts Receivable are comprised of the following components:


	March 31,			March 31,
	2006			2005
	(in millions)

Current:
Accounts receivable	$	828		$	794
Other receivables		77			39
Unbilled amounts due within the next 12 months — prior business model		253			391
Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts		(25	)		(35	)
Less: Unearned revenue — current		(701	)		(468	)

Net trade and installment accounts receivable — current	$	432		$	721

Noncurrent:
Unbilled amounts due beyond the next 12 months — prior business model		511			759
Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts		(20	)		(53	)
Less: Unearned revenue — noncurrent		(42	)		(111	)

Net installment accounts receivable — noncurrent	$	449		$	595

The components of unearned revenue consist of the following:


	March 31,		March 31,
	2006		2005
	(in millions)

Current:
Unamortized discounts	$	44	$	62
Unearned maintenance		4		23
Deferred subscription revenue (billed, uncollected)		606		369
Unearned professional services		47		14

Total unearned revenue — current	$	701	$	468

Noncurrent:
Unamortized discounts	$	34	$	79
Unearned maintenance		8		32

Total unearned revenue — noncurrent	$	42	$	111

Note 6 — Debt

Credit Facilities

As of March 31, 2006 and 2005, the Company’s committed bank credit facilities consisted of a $1 billion, unsecured bank revolving credit facility expiring in December 2008 (the 2004 Revolving Credit Facility).

March 31,

2006

2005

Maximum

Outstanding

Maximum

Outstanding

Available

Balance

Available

Balance

(in millions)

2004 Revolving Credit Facility

1,000

—

1,000

—

Note 6 — Debt (Continued)

2004 Revolving Credit Facility

In December 2004, the Company entered into a new unsecured, revolving credit facility (the 2004 Revolving Credit Facility). The maximum amount available under the 2004 Revolving Credit Facility is $1 billion exclusive of incremental credit increases of up to an additional $250 million which are available subject to certain conditions and the agreement of our lenders. The 2004 Revolving Credit Facility expires December 2008 and no amount was drawn as of March 31, 2006 or March 31, 2005.

Borrowings under the 2004 Revolving Credit Facility will bear interest at a rate dependent on the Company’s credit ratings at the time of such borrowings and will be calculated according to a base rate or a Eurocurrency rate, as the case may be, plus an applicable margin and utilization fee. Depending on the Company’s credit rating at the time of borrowing, the applicable margin can range from 0% to 0.325% for a base rate borrowing and from 0.50% to 1.325% for a Eurocurrency borrowing, and the utilization fee can range from 0.125% to 0.250%. At the Company’s current credit rating, the applicable margin would be 0% for a base rate borrowing and 0.70% for a Eurocurrency borrowing, and the utilization fee would be 0.125%. In addition, the Company must pay facility fees quarterly at rates dependent on the Company’s credit ratings. The facility fees can range from 0.125% to 0.30% of the aggregate amount of each lender’s full revolving credit commitment (without taking into account any outstanding borrowings under such commitments). At the Company’s current credit ratings, the facility fee is 0.175% of the aggregate amount of each lender’s revolving credit commitment.

The 2004 Revolving Credit Facility contains customary covenants for transactions of this type, including two financial covenants: (i) for the 12-months ending each quarter-end, the ratio of consolidated debt for borrowed money to consolidated cash flow, each as defined in the 2004 Revolving Credit Facility, must not exceed 3.25 for the quarter ending December 31, 2004 and 2.75 for quarters ending March 31, 2005 and thereafter; and (ii) for the 12-months ending each quarter-end, the ratio of consolidated cash flow to the sum of interest payable on, and amortization of debt discount in respect of, all consolidated debt for borrowed money, as defined in the 2004 Revolving Credit Facility, must not be less than 5.00. In addition, as a condition precedent to each borrowing made under the 2004 Revolving Credit Facility, as of the date of such borrowing, (i) no event of default shall have occurred and be continuing and (ii) the Company is to reaffirm that the representations and warranties made in the 2004 Revolving Credit Facility (other than the representation with respect to material adverse changes, but including the representation regarding the absence of certain material litigation) are correct.

The Company capitalized the transaction fees associated with the 2004 Revolving Credit Facility, which totaled approximately $6 million. The Company is amortizing these fees over the term of the 2004 Revolving Credit Facility to “Interest expense, net” on the Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Senior Note Obligations

As of March 31, 2006 and 2005, the Company had the following unsecured, fixed-rate interest, senior note obligations outstanding:


	March 31,
	2006		2005
	(in millions)

6.375% Senior Notes due April 2005	$	—	$	825
6.500% Senior Notes due April 2008		350		350
4.750% Senior Notes due December 2009		500		500
1.625% Convertible Senior Notes due December 2009		460		460
5.625% Senior Notes due December 2014		500		500

Fiscal Year 1999 Senior Notes

In fiscal year 1999, the Company issued $1.750 billion of unsecured Senior Notes in a transaction pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933 (Rule 144A). Amounts borrowed, rates, and maturities for each issue were $575 million at 6.25% due April 15, 2003, $825 million at 6.375% due April 15, 2005, and $350 million at

Note 6 — Debt (Continued)

6.5% due April 15, 2008. In April 2005, the Company repaid the $825 million balance of the 6.375% Senior Notes from available cash balances. As of March 31, 2006, $350 million of the 6.5% Senior Notes, remained outstanding.

Fiscal Year 2005 Senior Notes

In November 2004, the Company issued an aggregate of $1 billion of unsecured Senior Notes (2005 Senior Notes) in a transaction pursuant to Rule 144A. The Company issued $500 million of 4.75%, 5-year notes due December 2009 and $500 million of 5.625%, 10-year notes due December 2014. The Company has the option to redeem the 2005 Senior Notes at any time, at redemption prices equal to the greater of (i) 100% of the aggregate principal amount of the notes of such series being redeemed and (ii) the present value of the principal and interest payable over the life of the 2005 Senior Notes, discounted at a rate equal to 15 basis points and 20 basis points for the 5-year notes and 10-year notes, respectively, over a comparable U.S. Treasury bond yield. The maturity of the 2005 Senior Notes may be accelerated by the holders upon certain events of default, including failure to make payments when due and failure to comply with covenants in the 2005 Senior Notes. The 5-year notes were issued at a price equal to 99.861% of the principal amount and the 10-year notes were issued at a price equal to 99.505% of the principal amount for resale under Rule 144A and Regulation S. The Company also agreed for the benefit of the holders to register the 2005 Senior Notes under the Securities Act of 1933 so that the 2005 Senior Notes may be sold in the public market. The Company did not meet certain deadlines for filing and effectiveness of the registration statement; therefore, the interest rate on the 2005 Senior Notes increased by 25 basis points for the first 90 days and by an additional 25 basis points thereafter. As of March 31, 2006, the Company has not registered the notes and has incurred approximately $2 million in penalty fees which have been recorded in the “Interest expense, net” line item of the Unaudited Consolidated Statement of Operation for the fiscal year 2006. The Company used the net proceeds from this issuance to repay debt as described above.

The Company capitalized the transaction fees associated with the 2005 Senior Notes, which totaled approximately $7 million. These fees are being amortized over the period through maturity of the 2005 Senior Notes in the “Interest expense, net” line item on the Unaudited Consolidated Statement of Operations.

1.625% Convertible Senior Notes

In fiscal year 2003, the Company issued $460 million of unsecured 1.625% Convertible Senior Notes (1.625% Notes), due December 15, 2009, in a transaction pursuant to Rule 144A. The 1.625% Notes are senior unsecured indebtedness, rank equally with all existing senior unsecured indebtedness and are convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion price of $20.04 per share. The initial conversion rate is 49.9002 common shares per $1,000 principal amount of the 1.625% Notes and is subject to adjustment under certain circumstances. The Company may redeem the 1.625% Notes only at the maturity date. We capitalized the initial transaction fees associated with the 1.625% Notes, which totaled approximately $12 million. These fees are being amortized over the period through maturity of the 1.625% Notes in the “Interest expense, net” line item on the Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Concurrent with the issuance of the 1.625% Notes, the Company entered into call spread repurchase option transactions (1.625% Notes Call Spread). The option purchase price of the Call Spread was $73 million and the entire purchase price was charged to Stockholders’ Equity in December 2002. Under the terms of the 1.625% Notes Call Spread, the Company can elect to receive (i) outstanding shares equivalent to the number of shares that will be issued if all of the 1.625% Notes are converted into shares (23 million shares) upon payment of an exercise price of $20.04 per share (aggregate price of $460 million); or (ii) a net cash settlement, net share settlement or a combination, whereby the Company will receive cash or shares equal to the increase in the market value of the 23 million shares from the aggregate value at the $20.04 exercise price (aggregate price of $460 million), subject to the upper limit of $30.00 discussed below. The 1.625% Notes Call Spread is designed to partially mitigate the potential dilution from conversion of the 1.625% Notes, depending upon the market price of our common stock at such time. The 1.625% Notes Call Spread can be exercised in December 2009 at an exercise price of $20.04 per share. To limit the cost of the 1.625% Notes Call Spread, an upper limit of $30.00 per share has been set, such that if the price of the common stock is above that limit at the time of exercise, the number of shares eligible to be purchased will be proportionately reduced based on the amount by which the common share price

Note 6 — Debt (Continued)

exceeds $30.00 at the time of exercise. As of March 31, 2006, the estimated fair value of the 1.625% Notes Call Spread was approximately $120 million, which was based upon independent valuations from third-party financial institutions.

3% Concord Convertible Notes

In connection with the acquisition of Concord in June 2005, the Company assumed $86 million in 3% convertible senior notes due 2023. In accordance with the notes’ terms, the Company redeemed (for cash) the notes in full in July 2005.

Other Indebtedness


	March 31,
	2006				2005
	Maximum		Outstanding		Maximum		Outstanding
	Available		Balance		Available		Balance
	(in millions)

International line of credit	$	5	$	—	$	5	$	—
Other		—		1		—		1

International Line of Credit

An unsecured and uncommitted multi-currency line of credit is available to meet short-term working capital needs for the Company subsidiaries operating outside the United States. The line of credit is available on an offering basis, meaning that transactions under the line of credit will be on such terms and conditions, including interest rate, maturity, representations, covenants and events of default, as mutually agreed between the Company subsidiaries and the local bank at the time of each specific transaction. As of March 31, 2006, this line totaled approximately $5 million, of which approximately $3 million was pledged in support of bank guarantees. Amounts drawn under these facilities as of March 31, 2006 were minimal.

In addition to the above facility, the Company foreign subsidiaries use guarantees issued by commercial banks to guarantee performance on certain contracts. At March 31, 2006 the aggregate amount of significant guarantees outstanding was approximately $5 million, none of which had been drawn down by third parties.

Other

As of March 31, 2006 and 2005, the Company had various other debt obligations outstanding, which approximated $1 million.

As of June 2006, the Company’s senior unsecured notes are rated Ba1, BBB-, and BBB- by Moody’s, S&P and Fitch, respectively, and are on negative outlook with all three agencies.

The Company conducts an ongoing review of its capital structure and debt obligations as part of its risk management strategy. The fair value of the Company’s long-term debt, including the current portion of long-term debt, was $1.96 billion and $2.83 billion at March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The fair value of long-term debt is based on quoted market prices. See also Note 1, “Significant Accounting Policies.”

Interest expense for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004 was $95 million, $153 million, and $136 million, respectively.

The maturities of outstanding debt are as follows:


	Year Ended March 31,
	2007		2008		2009		2010		2011		Thereafter
	(in millions)

Amount due	$	1	$	—	$	350	$	960	$	—	$	500

Note 7 — Commitments and Contingencies

The Company leases real estate and certain data processing and other equipment with lease terms expiring through 2023. The leases are operating leases and provide for renewal options and additional rentals based on escalations in operating expenses and real estate taxes. The Company has no material capital leases.

Rental expense under operating leases for facilities and equipment was $199 million, $187 million, and $179 million for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively. Rental expense for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004 includes sublease income of $10 million, $16 million and $29 million, respectively.

Future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases at March 31, 2006, were as follows:


	(in millions)

2007	$	153
2008		129
2009		97
2010		74
2011		55
Thereafter		197

Total		705
Less income from sublease		(93	)

Net minimum operating lease payments	$	612

The Company has commitments to invest approximately $3 million in connection with joint venture agreements.

Prior to fiscal year 2001, the Company sold individual accounts receivable under the prior business model to a third party subject to certain recourse provisions. The outstanding principal balance of these receivables subject to recourse approximated $146 million and $183 million as of March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

Stockholder Class Action and Derivative Lawsuits Filed Prior to 2004

The Company, its former Chairman and CEO Charles B. Wang, its former Chairman and CEO Sanjay Kumar, its former Chief Financial Officer Ira Zar, and its Executive Vice President Russell M. Artzt were defendants in one or more stockholder class action lawsuits, filed in July 1998, February 2002, and March 2002 in the United States District of New York (the Federal Court), alleging, among other things, that a class consisting of all persons who purchased the Company’s common stock during the period from January 20, 1998 until July 22, 1998 were harmed by misleading statements, misrepresentations, and omissions regarding the Company’s future financial performance. In addition, in May 2003, a class action lawsuit captioned John A. Ambler v. Computer Associates International, Inc., et al. was filed in the Federal Court. The complaint in this matter, a purported class action on behalf of the Computer Associates Savings Harvest Plan (the CASH Plan) and the participants in, and beneficiaries of, the CASH Plan for a class period running from March 30, 1998, through May 30, 2003, asserted claims of breach of fiduciary duty under the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). The named defendants were the Company, the Company’s Board of Directors, the CASH Plan, the Administrative Committee of the CASH Plan, and the following current or former employees and/or former directors of the Company: Messrs. Wang; Kumar; Zar; Artzt; Peter A. Schwartz; and Charles P. McWade; and various unidentified alleged fiduciaries of the CASH Plan. The complaint alleged that the defendants breached their fiduciary duties by causing the CASH Plan to invest in Company securities and sought damages in an unspecified amount.

A derivative lawsuit was filed against certain current and former directors of the Company, based on essentially the same allegations as those contained in the February and March 2002 stockholder lawsuits discussed above. This action was commenced in April 2002 in Delaware Chancery Court, and an amended complaint was filed in November 2002. The defendants named in the amended complaint were the Company as a nominal defendant, current Company directors Mr. Lewis S. Ranieri, and The Honorable Alfonse M. D’Amato, and former Company directors Ms. Shirley Strum Kenny and Messrs. Wang, Kumar, Artzt, Willem de Vogel, Richard Grasso, and Roel Pieper. The derivative suit alleged breach of fiduciary duties on the part of all the individual defendants and, as

Note 7 — Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)

against the former management director defendants, insider trading on the basis of allegedly misappropriated confidential, material information. The amended complaint sought an accounting and recovery on behalf of the Company of an unspecified amount of damages, including recovery of the profits allegedly realized from the sale of common stock of the Company.

On August 25, 2003, the Company announced the settlement of all outstanding litigation related to the above-referenced stockholder and derivative actions as well as the settlement of an additional derivative action filed in the Federal Court in connection with the settlement. As part of the class action settlement, which was approved by the Federal Court in December 2003, the Company agreed to issue a total of up to 5.7 million shares of common stock to the stockholders represented in the three class action lawsuits, including payment of attorneys’ fees. The Company has completed the issuance of the settlement shares as well as payment of $3.3 million to the plaintiffs’ attorneys in legal fees and related expenses.

In settling the derivative suit, which settlement was also approved by the Federal Court in December 2003, the Company committed to maintain certain corporate governance practices. Under the settlement, the Company and the individual defendants were released from any potential claim by stockholders arising from accounting-related or other public statements made by the Company or its agents from January 1998 through February 2002 (and from January 1998 through May 2003 in the case of the employee ERISA action), and the individual defendants were released from any potential claim by the Company or its stockholders relating to the same matters.

On October 5, 2004 and December 9, 2004, four purported Company stockholders served motions to vacate the Order of Final Judgment and Dismissal entered by the Federal Court in December 2003 in connection with the settlement of the derivative action. These motions primarily seek to void the releases that were granted to the individual defendants under the settlement. On December 7, 2004, a motion to vacate the Order of Final Judgment and Dismissal entered by the Federal Court in December 2003 in connection with the settlement of the 1998 and 2002 stockholder lawsuits discussed above was filed by Sam Wyly and certain related parties. The motion seeks to reopen the settlement to permit the moving stockholders to pursue individual claims against certain present and former officers of the Company. The motion states that the moving stockholders do not seek to file claims against the Company. These motions (the 60(b) Motions) have been fully briefed. On June 14, 2005, the Federal Court granted movants’ motion to be allowed to take limited discovery prior to the Federal Court’s ruling on the 60(b) Motions. No hearing date is currently set for the 60(b) Motions.

The Government Investigation

In 2002, the United States Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of New York (USAO) and the staff of the Northeast Regional Office of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) commenced an investigation concerning certain of the Company’s past accounting practices, including the Company’s revenue recognition procedures in periods prior to the adoption of the Company’s business model in October 2000.

In response to the investigation, the Board of Directors authorized the Audit Committee (now the Audit and Compliance Committee) to conduct an independent investigation into the timing of revenue recognition by the Company. On October 8, 2003, the Company reported that the ongoing investigation by the Audit and Compliance Committee had preliminarily found that revenues were prematurely recognized in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2000, and that a number of software license agreements appeared to have been signed after the end of the quarter in which revenues associated with such software license agreements had been recognized in that fiscal year. Those revenues, as the Audit and Compliance Committee found, should have been recognized in the quarter in which the software license agreements were signed. Those preliminary findings were reported to government investigators.

Following the Audit and Compliance Committee’s preliminary report and at its recommendation, four executives who oversaw the relevant financial operations during the period in question, including Ira Zar, resigned at the Company’s request. On January 22, 2004, one of these individuals pled guilty to federal criminal charges of conspiracy to obstruct justice in connection with the ongoing investigation. On April 8, 2004, Mr. Zar and two other former executives pled guilty to charges of conspiracy to obstruct justice and conspiracy to commit securities fraud in connection with the investigation, and Mr. Zar also pled guilty to committing securities fraud. The SEC filed

Note 7 — Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)

related actions against each of the four former executives alleging that they participated in a widespread practice that resulted in the improper recognition of revenue by the Company. Without admitting or denying the allegations in the complaints, Mr. Zar and the two other executives each consented to a permanent injunction against violating, or aiding and abetting violations of, the securities laws, and also to a permanent bar from serving as an officer or director of a publicly held company. Litigation with respect to the SEC’s claims for disgorgement and penalties is continuing.

A number of other employees, primarily in the Company’s legal and finance departments were terminated or resigned as a result of matters under investigation by the Audit and Compliance Committee, including Steven Woghin, the Company’s former General Counsel. Stephen Richards, the Company’s former Executive Vice President of Sales, resigned from his position and was relieved of all duties in April 2004, and left the Company at the end of June 2004. Additionally, on April 21, 2004, Sanjay Kumar resigned as Chairman, director and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and assumed the role of Chief Software Architect. Thereafter, Mr. Kumar resigned from the Company effective June 30, 2004.

In April 2004, the Audit and Compliance Committee completed its investigation and determined that the Company should restate certain financial data to properly reflect the timing of the recognition of license revenue for the Company’s fiscal years ended March 31, 2001 and 2000. The Audit and Compliance Committee believes that the Company’s financial reporting related to contracts executed under its current business model is unaffected by the improper accounting practices that were in place prior to the adoption of the business model in October 2000 and that had resulted in the restatement, and that the historical issues it had identified in the course of its independent investigation concerned the premature recognition of revenue. However, certain of these prior period accounting errors have had an impact on the subsequent financial results of the Company as described in Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company’s amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005. The Company continues to implement and consider additional remedial actions it deems necessary.

On September 22, 2004, the Company reached agreements with the USAO and the SEC by entering into a Deferred Prosecution Agreement (the DPA) with the USAO and consenting to the entry of a Final Consent Judgment in a parallel proceeding brought by the SEC (the Consent Judgment, and together with the DPA, the Agreements). The Federal Court approved the DPA on September 22, 2004 and entered the Consent Judgment on September 28, 2004. The Agreements resolve the USAO and SEC investigations into certain of the Company’s past accounting practices, including its revenue recognition policies and procedures, and obstruction of their investigations.

Under the DPA, the Company has agreed to establish a $225 million fund for purposes of restitution to current and former stockholders of the Company, with $75 million to be paid within 30 days of the date of approval of the DPA by the Federal Court, $75 million to be paid within one year after the approval date and $75 million to be paid within 18 months after the approval date. The Company made the first $75 million restitution payment into an interest-bearing account under terms approved by the USAO on October 22, 2004. The Company made the second $75 million restitution payment into an interest-bearing account under terms approved by the USAO on September 22, 2005. The Company made the third and final $75 million restitution payment into an interest-bearing account under terms approved by the USAO on March 22, 2006. Pursuant to the Agreements, the Company proposed and the USAO accepted, on or about November 4, 2004, the appointment of Kenneth R. Feinberg as Fund Administrator. Also, pursuant to the Agreements, Mr. Feinberg submitted to the USAO on or about June 28, 2005, a Plan of Allocation for the Restitution Fund (the Plan). The Plan was approved by the Federal Court on August 18, 2005. The payment of these restitution funds is in addition to the amounts that the Company previously agreed to provide current and former stockholders in settlement of certain private litigation in August 2003 (see “— Stockholder Class Action and Derivative Lawsuits Filed Prior to 2004”). This amount was paid by the Company in December 2004 in shares at a then total value of approximately $174 million.

The Company also agreed, among other things, to take the following actions by December 31, 2005: (1) add a minimum of two new independent directors to its Board of Directors; (2) establish a Compliance Committee of the Board of Directors; (3) implement an enhanced compliance and ethics program, including appointment of a Chief Compliance Officer; (4) reorganize its Finance and Internal Audit Departments; and (5) establish an executive

Note 7 — Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)

disclosure committee. The reorganization of the Finance and Internal Audit Departments are substantially completed. On December 9, 2004, the Company announced that Patrick J. Gnazzo had been named Senior Vice President, Business Practices, and Chief Compliance Officer, effective January 10, 2005. On February 11, 2005, the Board of Directors elected William McCracken to serve as a new independent director, and also changed the name of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors to the Audit and Compliance Committee of the Board of Directors and amended the Committee’s charter. On April 11, 2005, the Board of Directors elected Ron Zambonini to serve as a new independent director. On November 11, 2005, the Board of Directors elected Christopher Lofgren to serve as a new independent director. Under the Agreements, the Company has also agreed to the appointment of an Independent Examiner to examine the Company’s practices for the recognition of software license revenue, its ethics and compliance policies and other matters. Under the Agreements, the Independent Examiner also reviews the Company’s compliance with the Agreements and periodically reports findings and recommendations to the USAO, SEC and Board of Directors. On March 16, 2005, the Federal Court appointed Lee S. Richards III, Esq. of Richards Spears Kibbe & Orbe LLP, to serve as Independent Examiner. Mr. Richards will serve for a term of 18 months unless his term of appointment is extended under conditions specified in the DPA. On September 15, 2005, Mr. Richards issued his six-month report concerning his recommendations regarding best practices. On December 15, 2005, March 15, 2006 and June 15, 2006 Mr. Richards issued his first three quarterly reports concerning the Company’s compliance with the DPA.

Pursuant to the DPA, the USAO will defer and subsequently dismiss prosecution of a two-count information filed against the Company charging it with committing securities fraud and obstruction of justice if the Company abides by the terms of the DPA, which currently is set to expire within 30 days after the Independent Examiner’s term of engagement is completed. Pursuant to the Consent Judgment with the SEC, the Company is permanently enjoined from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (the Securities Act), Sections 10(b), 13(a) and 13(b)(2) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Rules 10b-5, 12b-20, 13a-1 and 13a-13 under the Exchange Act. Pursuant to the Agreements, the Company has also agreed to comply in the future with federal criminal laws, including securities laws. In addition, the Company has agreed not to make any public statement, in litigation or otherwise, contradicting its acceptance of responsibility for the accounting and other matters that are the subject of the investigations, or the related allegations by the USAO, as set forth in the DPA.

Under the Agreements, the Company also is required to cooperate fully with the USAO and SEC concerning their ongoing investigations into the misconduct of any present or former employees of the Company. The Company has also agreed to fully support efforts by the USAO and SEC to obtain disgorgement of compensation from any present or former officer of the Company who engaged in any improper conduct while employed at the Company.

After the Independent Examiner’s term expires, the USAO will seek to dismiss its charges against the Company. However, the Company shall be subject to prosecution at any time if the USAO determines that the Company has deliberately given materially false, incomplete or misleading information pursuant to the DPA, has committed any federal crime after the date of the DPA or has knowingly, intentionally and materially violated any provision of the DPA (including any of those described above). Also, as indicated above, the USAO and SEC may require that the term of the DPA be extended beyond 18 months.

On September 22, 2004, Mr. Woghin, the Company’s former General Counsel, pled guilty to conspiracy to commit securities fraud and obstruction of justice under a two-count information filed against him by the USAO. The SEC also filed a complaint in the Federal Court against Mr. Woghin alleging that he violated Section 17(a) of the Securities Act, Sections 10(b) and 13(b)(5) of the Exchange Act, and Rules 10b-5 and 13b2-1 thereunder. The complaint further alleged that under Section 20(e) of the Exchange Act, Mr. Woghin aided and abetted the Company’s violations of Sections 10(b), 13(a), 13(b)(2)(A), and 13(b)(2)(B) of the Exchange Act and Rules 10b-5, 12b-20, 13a-1 and 13a-13 thereunder. Mr. Woghin consented to a partial judgment imposing a permanent injunction against him from committing such violations in the future and a permanent bar from being an officer or director of a public company. The SEC’s claims for disgorgement and civil penalties against Mr. Woghin are pending.

Additionally, on September 22, 2004, the SEC filed complaints in the Federal Court against Sanjay Kumar and Stephen Richards alleging that they violated Section 17(a) of the Securities Act, Sections 10(b) and 13(b)(5) of the Exchange Act, and Rules 10b-5 and 13b2-1 thereunder. The complaints further alleged that under Section 20(e) of

Note 7 — Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)

the Exchange Act, Messrs. Kumar and Richards aided and abetted the Company’s violations of Sections 10(b), 13(a), 13(b)(2)(A), and 13(b)(2)(B) of the Exchange Act and Rules 10b-5, 12b-20, 13a-1 and 13a-13 thereunder. The complaint seeks to enjoin Messrs. Kumar and Richards from further violations of the Securities Act and the Exchange Act and for disgorgement of gains they received as a result of these violations.

On September 23, 2004, the USAO filed, in the Federal Court, a ten-count indictment charging Messrs. Kumar and Richards with conspiracy to commit securities fraud and wire fraud, committing securities fraud, filing false SEC filings, conspiracy to obstruct justice and obstruction of justice. Additionally, Mr. Kumar was charged with one count of making false statements to an agent of the Federal Bureau of Investigation and Mr. Richards was charged with one count of perjury in connection with sworn testimony before the SEC. On or about June 29, 2005, the USAO filed a superseding indictment against Messrs. Kumar and Richards, dropping one count and adding several allegations to certain of the nine remaining counts. On April 24, 2006, Messrs. Kumar and Richards pled guilty to all counts in the superseding indictment filed by the USAO. On June 14, 2006, Messrs. Kumar and Richards consented to a partial judgment imposing a permanent injunction against them from committing such violations in the future and a permanent bar from being an officer or director of a public company. The SEC’s claims for disgorgement and civil penalties against Messrs. Kumar and Richards are pending. Sentencing of Messrs. Kumar and Richards is currently scheduled to take place on September 12, 2006.

On April 21, 2006, Thomas M. Bennett, the Company’s former Senior Vice President, Business Development, was arrested pursuant to an arrest warrant issued by the Federal Court. The arrest warrant charges Mr. Bennett with three counts of conspiracy to commit obstruction of justice in violation of Title 18, United States Code, sections 1510(a) and 1505, and Title 18, United States Code, Section 371. On June 21, 2006, Mr. Bennett pled guilty to obstruction of justice. Sentencing of Mr. Bennett is currently scheduled to take place on October 12, 2006.

As required by the Agreements, the Company continues to cooperate with the USAO and SEC in connection with their ongoing investigations of the conduct described in the Agreements, including providing documents and other information to the USAO and SEC. The Company cannot predict at this time the outcome of the USAO’s and SEC’s ongoing investigations, including any actions the Company may have to take in response to these investigations.

Derivative Actions Filed in 2004

In June 2004, a purported derivative action was filed in the Federal Court by Ranger Governance Ltd. against certain current or former employees and/or directors of the Company. In July 2004, two additional purported derivative actions were filed in the Federal Court by purported Company stockholders against certain current or former employees and/or directors of the Company. In November 2004, the Federal Court issued an order consolidating these three derivative actions. The plaintiffs filed a consolidated amended complaint (the Consolidated Complaint) on January 7, 2005. The Consolidated Complaint names as defendants Messrs. Wang, Kumar, Zar, Artzt, D’Amato, Richards, Ranieri and Woghin; David Kaplan; David Rivard; Lloyd Silverstein; Michael A. McElroy; Messrs. McWade and Schwartz; Gary Fernandes; Robert E. La Blanc; Jay W. Lorsch; Kenneth Cron; Walter P. Schuetze; Messrs. de Vogel and Grasso; Roel Pieper; KPMG LLP; and Ernst & Young LLP. The Company is named as a nominal defendant. The Consolidated Complaint alleges a claim against Messrs. Wang, Kumar, Zar, Kaplan, Rivard, Silverstein, Artzt, D’Amato, Richards, McElroy, McWade, Schwartz, Fernandes, La Blanc, Ranieri, Lorsch, Cron, Schuetze, de Vogel, Grasso, Pieper and Woghin for contribution towards the consideration the Company had previously agreed to provide current and former stockholders in settlement of certain class action litigation commenced against the Company and certain officers and directors in 1998 and 2002 (see “— Stockholder Class Action and Derivative Lawsuits Filed Prior to 2004”) and seeks on behalf of the Company compensatory and consequential damages in an amount no less than $500 million in connection with the USAO and SEC investigations (see “— The Government Investigation”). The Consolidated Complaint also alleges a claim seeking unspecified relief against Messrs. Wang, Kumar, Zar, Kaplan, Rivard, Silverstein, Artzt, D’Amato, Richards, McElroy, McWade, Fernandes, La Blanc, Ranieri, Lorsch, Cron, Schuetze, de Vogel and Woghin for violations of Section 14(a) of the Exchange Act for alleged false and material misstatements made in the Company’s proxy statements issued in 2002 and 2003. The Consolidated Complaint also alleges breach of fiduciary duty by Messrs. Wang, Kumar, Zar, Kaplan, Rivard, Silverstein, Artzt, D’Amato, Richards, McElroy, McWade, Schwartz,

Note 7 — Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)

Fernandes, La Blanc, Ranieri, Lorsch, Cron, Schuetze, de Vogel, Grasso, Pieper and Woghin. The Consolidated Complaint also seeks unspecified compensatory, consequential and punitive damages against Messrs. Wang, Kumar, Zar, Kaplan, Rivard, Silverstein, Artzt, D’Amato, Richards, McElroy, McWade, Schwartz, Fernandes, La Blanc, Ranieri, Lorsch, Cron, Schuetze, de Vogel, Grasso, Pieper and Woghin based upon allegations of corporate waste and fraud. The Consolidated Complaint also seeks unspecified damages against Ernst & Young LLP and KPMG LLP, for breach of fiduciary duty and the duty of reasonable care, as well as contribution and indemnity under Section 14(a) of the Exchange Act. The Consolidated Complaint requests restitution and rescission of the compensation earned under the Company’s executive compensation plan by Messrs. Artzt, Kumar, Richards, Zar, Woghin, Kaplan, Rivard, Silverstein, Wang, McElroy, McWade and Schwartz. Additionally, pursuant to Section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the Consolidated Complaint seeks reimbursement of bonus or other incentive-based equity compensation received by defendants Wang, Kumar, Schwartz and Zar, as well as alleged profits realized from their sale of securities issued by the Company during the time periods they served as the Chief Executive Officer (Messrs. Wang and Kumar) and Chief Financial Officer (Mr. Zar) of the Company. Although no relief is sought from the Company, the Consolidated Complaint seeks monetary damages, both compensatory and consequential, from the other defendants, including current or former employees and/or directors of the Company, KPMG LLP and Ernst & Young LLP in an amount totaling not less than $500 million.

The consolidated derivative action has been stayed pending resolution of the 60(b) Motions (see “— Stockholder Class Action and Derivative Lawsuits Filed Prior to 2004”). Also, on February 1, 2005, the Company established a Special Litigation Committee of independent members of its Board of Directors to, among other things, control and determine the Company’s response to this litigation. The Special Litigation Committee is continuing to review these matters.

The Company is obligated to indemnify its officers and directors under certain circumstances to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law. As a part of that obligation, the Company has advanced and will continue to advance certain attorneys’ fees and expenses incurred by current and former officers and directors in various litigations and investigations arising out of similar allegations, including the litigation described above.

Texas Litigation

On August 9, 2004, a petition was filed by Sam Wyly and Ranger Governance, Ltd. against the Company in the District Court of Dallas County, Texas, seeking to obtain a declaratory judgment that plaintiffs did not breach two separation agreements they entered into with the Company in 2002 (the 2002 Agreements). Plaintiffs seek to obtain this declaratory judgment in order to file a derivative suit on behalf of the Company (see “— Derivative Actions Filed in 2004” above). On September 3, 2004, the Company filed an answer to the petition and on September 10, 2004, the Company filed a notice of removal seeking to remove the action to federal court. On February 18, 2005, Mr. Wyly filed a separate lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (the Texas federal court) alleging that he is entitled to attorneys’ fees in connection with the original litigation filed in Texas. The two actions have been consolidated. On March 31, 2005, the plaintiffs amended their complaint to allege a claim that they were defrauded into entering the 2002 Agreements and to seek rescission of those agreements and damages. The amended complaint in the Ranger Governance litigation seeks rescission of the 2002 Agreements, unspecified compensatory, consequential and exemplary damages and a declaratory judgment that the 2002 Agreements are null and void and that plaintiffs did not breach the 2002 Agreements. On May 11, 2005, the Company moved to dismiss the Texas litigation. On July 21, 2005, the plaintiffs filed a motion for summary judgment. On July 22, 2005, the Texas federal court dismissed the latter two motions without prejudice to refiling the motions later in the action. On September 1, 2005, the Texas federal court granted the Company’s motion to transfer the action to the Federal Court.

Other Civil Actions

In June 2004, a lawsuit captioned Scienton Technologies, Inc. et al. v. Computer Associates International, Inc., was filed in the Federal Court. The complaint seeks monetary damages in various amounts, some of which are unspecified, but which are alleged to exceed $868 million, based upon claims for, among other things, breaches of

Note 7 — Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)

contract, misappropriation of trade secrets, and unfair competition. This matter is in the early stages of discovery. Although the ultimate outcome cannot be determined, the Company believes that the claims are unfounded and that the Company has meritorious defenses. In the opinion of management, the resolution of this lawsuit is not likely to result in the payment of any amount approximating the alleged damages and in any event, is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the financial position of the Company.

In September 2004, two complaints to compel production of the Company’s books and records, including files that have been produced by the Company to the USAO and SEC in the course of their joint investigation of the Company’s accounting practices (see “— The Government Investigation”) were filed by two purported stockholders of the Company in Delaware Chancery Court pursuant to Section 220 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. The first complaint was filed on September 15, 2004, after the Company denied the purported stockholder access to some of the files requested in her initial demand, in particular files that had been produced by the Company to the USAO and SEC during the course of their joint investigation. This complaint concerns the inspection of certain Company documents to determine whether the Company has been involved in obstructing the joint investigation by the USAO and SEC and whether certain Company employees have breached their fiduciary duties to the Company and wasted corporate assets; these individuals include Messrs. Kumar, Wang, Zar, Silverstein, Woghin, Richards, Artzt, Cron, D’Amato, La Blanc, Ranieri, Lorsch, Schuetze, Vieux, Fernandes, de Vogel, Richard Grasso and Goldstein and Ms. Kenny. The Company filed its answer to this complaint on October 15, 2004. On October 11, 2005, the Special Litigation Committee (see “— Derivative Actions Filed in 2004”) moved to stay this action. On December 13, 2005, the Delaware state court denied that motion. The second complaint, filed on September 21, 2004, concerns the inspection of documents related to Mr. Kumar’s compensation, the independence of the Board of Directors and ability of the Board of Directors to sue for return of that compensation. The Company filed its answer to this complaint on October 15, 2004.

The Company, various subsidiaries, and certain current and former officers have been named as defendants in various other lawsuits and claims arising in the normal course of business. The Company believes that it has meritorious defenses in connection with such lawsuits and claims, and intends to vigorously contest each of them. In the opinion of the Company’s management, the results of these other lawsuits and claims, either individually or in the aggregate, are not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, or cash flow.

Note 8 — Income Taxes

The amounts of income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes attributable to domestic and foreign operations are as follows:


	Year Ended March 31,
	2006			2005			2004
	(in millions)

Domestic	$	(88	)	$	(236	)	$	(211	)
Foreign		201			238			113

	$	113		$	2		$	(98	)

100

Note 8 — Income Taxes (Continued)

The tax expense (benefit) from continuing operations is reconciled to the tax expense (benefit) from continuing operations computed at the federal statutory rate as follows:


	Year Ended March 31,
	2006			2005			2004
	(in millions)

Tax expense (benefit) at U.S. federal statutory rate	$	40		$	1		$	(34	)
Increase in tax expense resulting from:
Nondeductible portion of class action settlement and litigation charge		—			3			10
Federal tax cost of repatriation under the American Jobs Creation Act		—			55			—
U.S. share-based compensation		6			9			10
Effect of international operations, including foreign export benefit and nondeductible share-based compensation		(84	)		(64	)		(27	)
Tax credits		(51	)		—			—
Foreign export benefit refund		—			(26	)		—
State taxes, net of federal tax benefit		1			3			(6	)
Valuation allowance		21			7			22
Other, net		44			16			8

	$	(23	)	$	4		$	(17	)

Deferred income taxes reflect the impact of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities recognized for financial reporting purposes and the amounts recognized for tax purposes. The tax effects of the temporary differences are as follows:


	March 31,
	2006			2005
	(in millions)

Deferred tax assets:
Modified accrual basis accounting	$	147		$	—
Acquisition accruals		13			12
Share-based compensation		87			67
Restitution fund/class action settlement		1			51
Accrued expenses		85			59
Net operating losses		286			147
Valuation allowance		(154	)		(102	)
Purchased intangibles amortizable for tax purposes		62			69
Depreciation		28			22
Other(1)		54			32

Total deferred tax assets		609			357
Deferred tax liabilities:
Modified accrual basis accounting		—			15

102

Note 8 — Income Taxes (Continued)


	March 31,
	2006		2005
	(in millions)

Purchased software		76		166
Other intangible assets		150		87
Capitalized development costs		76		60
Foreign unremitted earnings to be repatriated		—		55

Total deferred tax liabilities		302		383

Net deferred tax asset (liability)	$	307	$	(26	)


(1)		Primarily represents deferred tax liabilities and assets in foreign tax jurisdictions, which in accordance with paragraphs 41 and 42 of SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes,” can be offset against the respective deferred tax assets and liabilities in each jurisdiction.

Worldwide net operating losses (NOLs) totaled approximately $866 million and $451 million as of March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. These NOLs expire between 2007 and 2026. In management’s judgment, the total deferred tax assets of $609 million for certain acquisition liabilities, NOLs, and other deferred tax assets, will more likely than not be realized as reductions of future taxable income or by utilizing available tax planning strategies. The valuation allowance increased $52 million and $42 million in March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The change in the valuation allowance primarily relates to acquired NOLs and NOLs in foreign jurisdictions that more likely than not in management’s judgment will not be realized. Additionally, approximately $57 million and $28 million of the valuation allowance as of March 31, 2006 and March 31, 2005, respectively, is attributable to acquired NOLs which are subject to annual limitations under IRS Code Section 382. The valuation allowance related to the acquired NOLs, if realized, will first reduce any remaining goodwill and then any remaining other non-current intangible assets.

The Company is subject to tax in many jurisdictions and a certain degree of estimation is required in recording assets and liabilities related to income taxes. Management believes that adequate provision has been made for any adjustments that may result from tax examinations. The outcome of tax examinations, however, cannot be predicted with certainty as tax matters could be subject to differing interpretations of applicable tax laws and regulations as they relate to the amount, timing or inclusion of revenue and expenses or the sustainability of income tax credits for a given audit cycle. The Company has established a liability of $235 million related to these matters. Should any issues addressed in the Company’s tax audits be resolved in a manner not consistent with management’s expectations, the Company could be required to adjust its provision for income tax in the period such resolution occurs.

During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2006, we repatriated approximately $584 million from foreign subsidiaries. Total taxes related to the repatriation were approximately $55 million. The repatriation was initially planned in fiscal year 2005 in response to the favorable tax benefits afforded by the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (AJCA), which introduced a special one-time dividends received deduction on the repatriation of certain foreign earnings to a U.S. taxpayer (repatriation provision), provided that certain criteria were met. During fiscal year 2005, we recorded an estimate of this tax charge of $55 million based on an estimated repatriation amount up to $500 million. In the first quarter of fiscal year 2006, we recorded a benefit of approximately $36 million reflecting the Department of Treasury and IRS Notice 2005-38 issued on May 10, 2005. In the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2006, the Company finalized its estimates of tax liabilities with a tax charge recorded in the amount of $36 million. As a result of this complex tax matter, the Company has identified a material weakness in its financial controls. No

103

Note 8 — Income Taxes (Continued)

provision has been made for federal income taxes on the remaining balance of the unremitted earnings of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries since the Company plans to permanently reinvest all such earnings outside the U.S. Unremitted earnings totaled approximately $685 million at March 31, 2006. Determination of the liability associated with these earnings is not practicable.

In the second quarter of fiscal year 2005, the Company recorded a foreign export benefit refund of approximately $26 million associated with prior fiscal years. The Company received a letter from the IRS approving the claim for this refund in September 2004.

In May 2004, the IRS issued Revenue Procedure 2004-34, “Changes in Accounting Periods and In Methods of Accounting,” which grants taxpayers a twelve month deferral for cash received from customers to the extent such receipts were not recognized in revenue for financial statement purposes. Therefore, taxes associated with cash collected from U.S. customers in advance of the ratable recognition of revenue for certain licenses are deferred for up to one year. As a result of implementing this Revenue Procedure, the Company reduced deferred tax assets and income taxes payable by approximately $73 million and $159 million as of March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Cash paid for income taxes in fiscal year 2005 was approximately $12 million, which was lower than the amount the Company historically pays for incomes taxes primarily due to the new IRS Revenue Procedure.

Note 9 — Stock Plans

Effective April 1, 2005, the Company adopted, under the modified retrospective basis, the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R), which establishes accounting for share-based awards exchanged for employee services. Under the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R), share-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date, based on the fair value of the award, and is recognized as an expense over the employee’s requisite service period (generally the vesting period of the award). The application of the modified retrospective method of SFAS No. 123(R) provides that the financial statements of prior periods are adjusted to reflect the fair value method of expensing share-based compensation for all awards granted on or after April 1, 1995, and accordingly, financial statement amounts for the prior periods presented in this Exhibit have been restated to reflect the fair value method of expensing share-based compensation, which was materially consistent with the pro-forma disclosures required for those periods by SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (SFAS No. 123).

The Company previously applied the provisions of Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and related interpretations for share-based awards granted prior to April 1, 2003 and, for fiscal years 2005 and 2004, applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 under the prospective transition method, which applied the fair value recognition provisions only to awards granted on or after April 1, 2003.

In accordance with SFAS No. 123(R), the Company is required to base initial compensation cost on the estimated number of awards for which the requisite service is expected to be rendered. Historically, and as permitted under SFAS No. 123, the Company chose to record reductions in compensation expense in the periods the awards were forfeited. The cumulative effect on prior periods of the change to an estimated number of awards for which the requisite service is expected to be rendered generated an approximate $1 million credit to the “Selling, general, and administrative” expense line item on the Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations during the first quarter of fiscal year 2006. In addition, as a result of the Company’s adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), an additional deferred tax asset of $51 million was recorded at March 31, 2005.

104

Note 9 — Stock Plans (Continued)

The Company recognized stock-based compensation in the following line items on the Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations for the periods indicated:


	Year Ended March 31,
	2006			2005			2004
	(in millions)

Cost of professional services	$	3		$	4		$	5
Selling, general, and administrative		62			53			59
Product development and enhancements		31			31			33

Share-based compensation expense before tax		96			88			97
Income tax benefit		(26	)		(15	)		(17	)

Net compensation expense	$	70		$	73		$	80

Total unrecognized compensation costs related to non-vested awards, expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.4 years, amounted to $102 million at March 31, 2006.

There were no capitalized share-based compensation costs at March 31, 2006, 2005 or 2004.

Share-based incentive awards are provided to employees under the terms of the Company’s plans (the Plans). The Plans are administered by the Compensation and Human Resource Committee of the Board of Directors (the Committee). Awards under the Plans may include at-the-money stock options, premium-priced stock options, restricted stock awards (RSAs), restricted stock units (RSUs), performance share units (PSUs), or any combination thereof. The non-management members of the Company’s Board of Directors also receive deferred stock units under a separate director compensation plan.

RSAs are stock awards issued to employees that are subject to specified restrictions and a risk of forfeiture. The restrictions typically lapse over a two or three year period. The fair value of the awards is determined and fixed based on the Company’s stock price on the grant date.

RSUs are stock awards that are issued to employees that entitle the holder to receive shares of common stock as the awards vest, typically over a two or three year period. The fair value of the awards is determined and fixed based on the Company’s stock price on the grant date, except that for RSUs not entitled to dividend equivalents, the stock price is reduced by the present value of the expected dividend stream during the vesting period which is calculated using the risk-free interest rate.

PSUs are awards issued under the long-term incentive plan for senior executives where the number of shares ultimately granted to the employee depends on Company performance measured against specified targets and is determined after a one-year or three-year period as applicable, the “1-year and 3-year PSUs”, respectively. The fair value of each award is estimated on the date that the performance targets are established based on the fair value of the Company’s stock, adjusted for dividends as described above for RSUs, and the Company’s estimate of the level of achievement of its performance targets, as described below. The Company is required to recalculate the fair value of issued PSUs each reporting period until they are granted, as defined in SFAS No. 123(R). The adjustment is based on the fair value of the Company’s stock on the reporting period date, adjusted for dividends as described above for RSUs.

Stock options are awards which allow the employee to purchase shares of the Company’s stock at a fixed price. Stock options are granted at an exercise price equal to or greater than the Company’s stock price on the date of grant. Awards granted after fiscal year 2000 generally vest one-third per year, become fully vested two or three years from the grant date and have a contractual term of ten years.

Descriptions of the Company’s Plans, all of which have been approved by the stockholders, are as follows:

The Company’s 1991 Stock Incentive Plan (the 1991 Plan) provided that stock appreciation rights and/or options, both qualified and non-statutory, to purchase up to 67.5 million shares of common stock of the Company, could be granted to employees (including officers of the Company). Options granted thereunder may be exercised in annual

105

Note 9 — Stock Plans (Continued)

increments commencing one year after the date of grant and become fully exercisable after five years. All options expire 10 years from the date of grant unless otherwise terminated. As of March 31, 2006, no stock appreciation rights were granted under this plan and 70.9 million options have been granted, including options issued that were previously terminated due to employee forfeitures. As of March 31, 2006, all of the 12.6 million options which were outstanding under the 1991 Plan were exercisable. These options are exercisable at $27.00 – $74.69 per share.

The 1993 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors (the 1993 Plan) provided for nonstatutory options to purchase up to a total of 337,500 shares of common stock of the Company to be available for grant to each member of the Board of Directors who is not otherwise an employee of the Company. Pursuant to the 1993 Plan, the exercise price was the fair market value (FMV) of the shares covered by the option at the date of grant. The option period shall not exceed 10 years, and each option may be exercised in whole or in part on the first anniversary date of its grant. As of March 31, 2006, 222,750 options have been granted under this plan. As of March 31, 2006, all of the 13,500 options which are outstanding under the 1993 Plan are exercisable. These options are exercisable at $32.38 – $51.44 per share.

The 1996 Deferred Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors (the 1996 Plan) provided for each director to receive annual director fees in the form of deferred shares. As of March 31, 2006, approximately 20,000 deferred shares are outstanding in connection with annual director fees under the 1996 Plan.

The 2001 Stock Option Plan (the 2001 Plan) was effective as of July 1, 2001. The 2001 Plan provides that nonstatutory and incentive stock options to purchase up to 7.5 million shares of common stock of the Company may be granted to select employees and consultants. All options expire 10 years from the date of grant unless otherwise terminated. As of March 31, 2006, 6.5 million options have been granted. These options are exercisable in annual increments commencing one year after the date of grant and become fully exercisable after three years. As of March 31, 2006, all of the 2.7 million options outstanding are exercisable. These options are exercisable at $21.89 per share.

The 2002 Incentive Plan (the 2002 Plan) was effective as of April 1, 2002. The Plan was amended on May 20, 2005. The 2002 Plan provides that annual performance bonuses, long-term performance bonuses, stock options, both non-qualified and incentive, restricted stock, and other equity-based awards to purchase up to 45 million shares of common stock of the Company may be granted to select employees and consultants. In addition, any shares of common stock that were subject to issuance but not awarded under the 2001 Plan are available for issuance under the 2002 Plan. As of March 31, 2006, 2.9 million of such shares were available for future issuance. All options expire 10 years from the date of grant unless otherwise terminated. Options cannot be repriced pursuant to the provisions of the 2002 Plan. As of March 31, 2006, options covering 16.4 million shares have been granted under the 2002 Plan. These options are generally exercisable in annual increments commencing one year after the date of grant and become fully exercisable after three years. As of March 31, 2006, 6.2 million of the 10.7 million options outstanding are exercisable. These options are exercisable at $12.89 – $32.80 per share. As of March 31, 2006, 1.6 million RSAs have been awarded to employees, of which approximately 700,000 shares are unreleased. As of March 31, 2006, 2.0 million RSUs have been awarded to employees, of which 1.7 million are unreleased. As of March 31, 2006, the Company estimates that it will award approximately 700,000 PSUs related to the fiscal year 2006 long-term incentive plan.

The 2002 Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors (the 2002 Director Plan) was effective as of July 1, 2002. The 2002 Director Plan provides for each director to receive annual director fees in the form of deferred shares and automatic grants to purchase 6,750 shares of common stock of the Company, up to a total of 650,000 shares to be granted to eligible directors. Pursuant to the 2002 Director Plan, the exercise price was the FMV of a share as of the date of grant. The option period shall not exceed 10 years, and each option may be exercised in whole or in part on the day before the next succeeding annual meeting. As of March 31, 2006, all of the approximately 42,000 options outstanding under the 2002 Director Plan were exercisable. These options are exercisable at $11.04 — $23.37 per share. As of March 31, 2006 approximately 25,000 deferred shares were outstanding in connection with annual director fees.

106

Note 9 — Stock Plans (Continued)

The 2003 Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors (the 2003 Director Plan) was effective as of August 27, 2003 and amended on August 24, 2005. The 2003 Director Plan provides for each director to receive annual director fees of $150,000, which was amended to $175,000 in August 2005 pursuant to the plan amendment, in the form of deferred shares with an option to elect to receive up to 50% in cash. In addition, certain directors receive an additional annual fee for their work as committee chair. As of March 31, 2006, approximately 91,000 deferred shares are outstanding in connection with annual director fees under the 2003 Director Plan.

Beginning with awards granted in fiscal year 2006, the Company changed its equity-based compensation strategy to provide the general population of employees with RSUs as opposed to stock options, which had been the Company’s previous practice. Awards associated with the fiscal year 2005 performance cycle were granted in the first quarter of fiscal year 2006, whereas awards associated with the fiscal year 2004 performance cycle were granted in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2004.

Equity based compensation granted to senior management employees is apportioned between RSAs, RSUs and stock options. Additionally, under the Company’s long-term incentive plan for fiscal year 2006, which is more fully described in the Company’s proxy statement dated July 26, 2005, senior executives were granted stock options and issued PSUs, under which the senior executives are eligible to receive RSAs or RSUs and unrestricted shares in the future if certain targets are achieved. Each quarter, the Company compares the actual performance the Company expects to achieve with the performance targets. The Committee reduced the number of shares granted under the 1-year PSUs to 75% of the original target. As such, the Company accrued compensation cost based on 75% of the 1-year PSUs initially expected to be earned under the long-term incentive plan. The Company believes its actual performance will not materially deviate from the previously established performance target for the 3-year PSUs. As such, the Company has accrued compensation cost based on 100% of the 3-year PSUs initially expected to be earned under the long-term incentive plan. Compensation cost will continue to be amortized over the requisite service period of the awards. At the conclusion of the performance period for the 3-year PSUs, the number of shares of unrestricted stock issued may vary based upon the level of achievement of the performance targets. The ultimate number of shares issued and the related compensation cost recognized will be based on a comparison of the final performance metrics to the specified targets.

As of March 31, 2006, 4.3 million of the 4.8 million options outstanding related to acquired companies’ stock plans are exercisable at $1.37 – $72.69 per share. Options granted under these acquired companies’ plans become exercisable over periods ranging from one to five years and expire seven to ten years from the date of grant.

107

Note 9 — Stock Plans (Continued)

The following table summarizes the activity of share options under the Company’s Plans:


	Number			Weighted Average
	of Shares			Exercise Price

(shares in millions)
Outstanding at March 31, 2003		48.2		$	28.74
Granted		6.4			27.68
Exercised		(3.9	)		14.57
Expired or terminated		(6.9	)		36.49

Outstanding at March 31, 2004		43.8		$	28.63
Granted		0.8			28.56
Acquired through acquisition		1.4			20.91
Exercised		(3.9	)		18.42
Expired or terminated		(8.5	)		32.43

Outstanding at March 31, 2005		33.6		$	28.50
Granted		2.7			28.59
Acquired through acquisition		2.3			20.62
Exercised		(5.0	)		19.63
Expired or terminated		(2.8	)		32.29

Outstanding at March 31, 2006		30.8		$	28.96


	Number		Weighted Average
	of Shares		Exercise Price

(shares in millions)
Options exercisable at:
March 31, 2004		26.0	$	30.88
March 31, 2005		25.5		29.81
March 31, 2006		25.8		29.27

The following table summarizes share option information as of March 31, 2006:


		Options Outstanding								Options Exercisable
						Weighted								Weighted
						Average		Weighted						Average
Range of				Aggregate		Remaining		Average				Aggregate		Remaining		Weighted
Exercise				Intrinsic		Contractual		Exercise				Intrinsic		Contractual		Average
Prices		Shares		Value		Life		Price		Shares		Value		Life		Exercise Price
(shares and aggregate intrinsic value in millions)

$	1.37 – $20.00		3.5	$	47		6.8 years	$	13.58		3.2	$	44		6.7 years	$	13.54
$	20.01 – $30.00		19.1		25		5.3 years		26.23		15.0		24		4.4 years		25.84
$	30.01 – $40.00		4.3		—		3.1 years		34.69		3.7		—		2.3 years		35.21
$	40.01 – $50.00		1.7		—		1.9 years		47.11		1.7		—		1.9 years		47.11
$	50.01 – $74.69		2.2		—		3.3 years		52.04		2.2		—		3.3 years		52.04

			30.8	$	72			$	28.96		25.8	$	68			$	29.27

The Company estimates the fair value of stock options using the Black-Scholes valuation model, consistent with the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R), Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107, and the Company’s prior period pro forma disclosures of net earnings, including stock-based compensation (determined under a fair value method as prescribed by SFAS No. 123). Key input assumptions used to estimate the fair value of stock options include the grant price of the award, the expected option term, volatility of the Company’s stock, the risk-free interest rate, and the Company’s dividend yield. The Company believes that the valuation

108

Note 9 — Stock Plans (Continued)

technique and the approach utilized to develop the underlying assumptions are appropriate in calculating the fair values of the Company’s stock options granted in the fiscal years ended March 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004. Estimates of fair value are not intended to predict actual future events or the value ultimately realized by employees who receive equity awards.

The weighted average fair value at date of grant for options granted in fiscal years 2006, 2005, and 2004 was $15.06, $15.44, and $14.60, respectively. The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The weighted average assumptions that were used for option grants in the respective periods are as follows:


	Year Ended March 31,
	2006			2005			2004

Dividend yield		.57	%		.28	%		.30	%
Expected volatility factor(1)		.56			.65			.67
Risk-free interest rate(2)		4.1	%		3.6	%		3.0	%
Expected life (in years)(3)		6.0			4.5			4.5


(1)		Measured using historical daily price changes of the Company’s stock over the respective term of the options and the implied volatility derived from the market prices of the Company’s traded options.

(2)		The risk-free rate for periods within the contractual term of the share options is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.

(3)		The expected term is the number of years that the Company estimates, based primarily on historical experience, that options will be outstanding prior to exercise. The increase in expected term in fiscal year 2006 as compared with fiscal year 2005 and 2004 was largely related to a change in the demographics of the recipients of the stock options. In fiscal year 2005, stock options were granted to a broad base of employees. In fiscal year 2006, stock options were primarily granted to executive management who historically hold options longer than the broad base of employees.

The following table summarizes the activity of the RSU’s under the Company’s Plans:


				Weighted Average
	Number			Grant Date
	of Shares			Fair Value

(shares in thousands)
Outstanding at March 31, 2003		106		$	52.88
Restricted units granted		—			—
Restricted units released		—			—
Restricted units cancelled		—			—

Outstanding at March 31, 2004		106		$	52.88
Restricted units granted		153			29.53
Restricted units released		(53	)		28.42
Restricted units cancelled		—			—

Outstanding at March 31, 2005		206		$	41.85
Restricted units granted		1,825			27.00
Restricted units released		(11	)		52.88
Restricted units cancelled		(198	)		27.00

Outstanding at March 31, 2006		1,822		$	28.53

109

Note 9 — Stock Plans (Continued)

The following table summarizes the activity of RSA’s under the Company’s Plans (no RSA’s were granted prior to fiscal year 2004):


				Weighted Average
	Number			Grant Date
	of Shares			Fair Value

(shares in thousands)
Outstanding at March 31, 2003		—		$	—
Restricted stock granted		627			26.86
Restricted stock released		—			—
Restricted stock cancelled		—			—

Outstanding at March 31, 2004		627		$	26.86
Restricted stock granted		577			25.30
Restricted stock released		(105	)		26.96
Restricted stock cancelled		(382	)		26.75

Outstanding at March 31, 2005		717		$	25.64
Restricted stock granted		354			27.41
Restricted stock released		(302	)		26.12
Restricted stock cancelled		(63	)		23.51

Outstanding at March 31, 2006		706		$	26.51

The total cash received from employees as a result of employee stock option exercises in fiscal years 2006, 2005, and 2004 was approximately $97 million, $73 million, and $57 million, respectively. The Company settles employee stock option exercises with stock held in treasury. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the fiscal years 2006, 2005 and 2004 was $41 million, $36 million and $45 million, respectively. The tax benefits realized by the Company for stock options exercised during fiscal years 2006, 2005, and 2004 was approximately $19 million, $14 million, and $7 million, respectively. The total intrinsic value of restricted awards released during the fiscal years 2006 and 2005 was $9 million and $4 million, respectively. There were no restricted awards released during fiscal year 2004.

Upon adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), the Company has elected to treat awards with only service conditions and with graduated vesting as one award. Consequently, the total compensation expense is recognized ratably over the entire vesting period, so long as compensation cost recognized at any date at least equals the portion of the grant-date value of the award that is vested at that date.

The Company completed its acquisition of Niku Corporation (Niku) during the quarter ended September 30, 2005. Pursuant to the merger agreement, options to purchase Niku common stock were converted (using a ratio of 0.732) into options to purchase approximately 0.8 million shares of the Company’s stock. The weighted average fair value of the options on the date of acquisition was $15.96. The fair value of each option grant was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The weighted average assumptions that were used for option grants were as follows:


Dividend yield	0.58	%
Expected volatility factor	0.45
Risk-free interest rate	4.0	%
Expected life (in years)	3.8

Refer to Note 2, “Acquisitions, Divestitures, and Restructuring,” of the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information concerning the acquisition of Niku.

The Company completed its acquisition of Concord Communications, Inc. (Concord) during the quarter ended June 30, 2005. Pursuant to the merger agreement, options to purchase Concord common stock were converted

110

Note 9 — Stock Plans (Continued)

(using a ratio of 0.626) into options to purchase approximately 1.5 million shares of the Company’s stock. The weighted average fair value of the options on the date of acquisition was $11.38. The fair value of each option grant was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The weighted average assumptions that were used for option grants were as follows:


Dividend yield	0.59	%
Expected volatility factor	0.46
Risk-free interest rate	3.6	%
Expected life (in years)	3.2

Refer to Note 2, “Acquisitions, Divestitures, and Restructuring,” of the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information concerning the acquisition of Concord.

In connection with the Company’s acquisition of Netegrity in fiscal year 2005, options to purchase Netegrity common stock were converted into options to purchase approximately 1.4 million shares of the Company’s stock. The weighted average fair value of the options on the date of acquisition was $20.19. The fair value of each option grant was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The weighted average assumptions that were used for option grants were as follows:


Dividend yield	0.26	%
Expected volatility factor	0.67
Risk-free interest rate	3.4	%
Expected life (in years)	4.5

Refer to Note 2, “Acquisitions, Divestitures, and Restructuring,” of the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information concerning the acquisition of Netegrity.

The Company maintains the Year 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the Purchase Plan) for all eligible employees. Consistent with the provisions of SFAS No. 123, the Year 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan under SFAS No. 123(R) is considered compensatory. Under the terms of the Purchase Plan, employees may elect to withhold between 1% and 25% of their base pay through regular payroll deductions, subject to Internal Revenue Code limitations. Shares of the Company’s common stock may be purchased at six-month intervals at 85% of the lower of the FMV on the first or last day of each six-month period. During fiscal years 2006, 2005, and 2004, employees purchased approximately 1 million shares each year at average prices of $23.31, $23.38, and $14.63 per share, respectively. As of March 31, 2006, 24 million shares were reserved for future issuance.

The weighted average fair value of the Purchase Plan awards for offering periods commencing in fiscal years 2006, 2005, and 2004 was $5.86, $6.52, and $7.28, respectively. The fair value is estimated on the first date of the offering period using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The weighted average assumptions that were used for the Purchase Plan shares in the respective periods are as follows:


	Year Ended March 31,
	2006			2005			2004

Dividend yield		.58	%		.27	%		.33	%
Expected volatility factor(1)		.20			.25			.53
Risk-free interest rate(2)		3.9	%		2.1	%		1.0	%
Expected life (in years)(3)		0.5			0.5			0.5


(1)		Expected volatility is measured using historical daily price changes of the Company’s stock over the respective term of the offer period.

(2)		The risk-free rate for periods within the contractual term of the offer period is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the beginning of the offer period.

(3)		The expected term is the offer period.

111

Note 9 — Stock Plans (Continued)

Under the 1998 Incentive Award Plan (the 1998 Plan), a total of four million Phantom Shares, as defined in the 1998 Plan, were available for grant to certain of the Company’s employees from time to time through March 31, 2003. Each Phantom Share is equivalent to one share of the Company’s common stock. Vesting, at 20% of the grant amount per annum, was contingent upon attainment of specific criteria, including an annual Target Closing Price (Price) for the Company’s common stock and the participant’s continued employment. The Price was based on the average closing price of the Company’s common stock on the New York Stock Exchange for the 10 days up to and including March 31 of each fiscal year. The Price for the first tranche was met on March 31, 2000 and the Price was not met for any subsequent tranche. Under SFAS No. 123(R), the Company is required to record a non-cash charge over the employment period irrespective of the attainment of the Price for each tranche. However, the Company is required to reverse expense for any shares that were forfeited as a result of a failure to fulfill the service condition. As a result, for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 the pre-tax non-cash amounts credited to expense were approximately $5 million and $2 million, respectively. There were no such credits for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006. As of March 31, 2006, approximately 106,000 Phantom Shares have vested and approximately 96,000 were outstanding under the 1998 Plan. The remaining vested shares will be paid out in increments of 20%, 30% and 40% on August 25, 2006, 2007, and 2008, respectively.

Note 10 — Profit-Sharing Plan

The Company maintains a defined contribution plan, the CA Savings Harvest Plan (CASH Plan), for the benefit of the U.S. employees of the Company. The CASH Plan is intended to be a qualified plan under Section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the Code), and contains a qualified cash or deferred arrangement as described under Section 401(k) of the Code. Pursuant to the CASH Plan, eligible participants may elect to contribute a percentage of their base compensation. The matching contributions to the CASH Plan totaled approximately $13 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006, and, excluding the discontinued operations of ACCPAC, totaled approximately $12 million for each of the fiscal years ended March 31, 2005 and 2004. In addition, the Company may make discretionary contributions to the CASH Plan. The discretionary contributions to the CASH plan totaled approximately $0 million, $15 million (excluding the discontinued operations of ACCPAC) and $20 million in fiscal years ended March 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

The Company made contributions to international retirement plans of $20 million, $23 million, and $20 million in the fiscal years ended March 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively.

Note 11 — Rights Plan

Each outstanding share of the Company’s common stock carries a stock purchase right issued under the Company’s Rights Agreement, dated June 18, 1991, as amended May 17, 1995, May 23, 2001, and November 9, 2001 (the Rights Agreement). Under certain circumstances, each right may be exercised to purchase one one-thousandth of a share of Series One Junior Participating Preferred Stock, Class A, for $150. Under certain circumstances, following (i) the acquisition of 20% or more of the Company’s outstanding common stock by an Acquiring Person (as defined in the Rights Agreement), (ii) the commencement of a tender offer or exchange offer which would result in a person or group owning 20% or more of the Company’s outstanding common stock, or (iii) the determination by the Company’s Board of Directors and a majority of the Disinterested Directors (as defined in the Rights Agreement) that a 15% stockholder is an Adverse Person (as defined in the Rights Agreement), each right (other than rights held by an Acquiring Person or Adverse Person) may be exercised to purchase common stock of the Company or a successor company with a market value of twice the $150 exercise price. The rights, which are redeemable by the Company at one cent per right, expire in November 2006.

Note 12 — Subsequent Events

In May 2006, the Company announced the acquisition of Cybermation, a privately-held provider of enterprise workload automation solutions, for a total purchase price of approximately $75 million. Cybermation specializes in software and services that modernize traditional job scheduling solutions and simplify the management of complex IT infrastructures. The acquisition extends the Company’s workload automation portfolio, which helps customers

112

SCHEDULE II

CA, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS


			Additions/
			(Deductions)
			Charged/			Charged/
	Balance at		(Credited) to			(Credited)						Balance
	Beginning		Costs and			to Other						at End
Description	of Period(1)		Expenses			Accounts(2)			Deductions(3)			of Period
	(in millions)

Allowance for doubtful accounts(4)
Year ended March 31, 2006	$	88	$	(18	)	$	—		$	(25	)	$	45
Year ended March 31, 2005	$	136	$	(25	)	$	(2	)	$	(21	)	$	88
Year ended March 31, 2004	$	264	$	(53	)	$	(2	)	$	(73	)	$	136


(1)		A reclassification was made to increase the accounts receivable balance by $20 million ($2 million current and $18 million non-current) and the allowance for doubtful accounts by $20 million ($2 million current and $18 million non-current). The reclassification was made to adjust the presentation of a valuation reserve that had previously been netted against the gross accounts receivable. There was no impact to net accounts receivable, current or non-current, due to this reclassification.

(2)		Reserves and adjustments thereto of acquired and divested operations.

(3)		Write-offs of amounts against allowance provided.

(4)		The Company expects the allowance for doubtful accounts to continue to decline as net installment accounts receivable under the prior business model are billed and collected over the remaining life. Under the Company’s Business Model, cash is often received prior to revenue recognition, thus reducing the need to provide for estimated bad debt associated with recorded revenue.

Exhibit 99.3

Notice to Directors and Executive Officers
Of CA, Inc.

This notice is to inform you of the following:

	1.		As previously communicated to you on June 13, 2006, CA, Inc. (the “Company”) would have been required to file its Annual Report on Form 10-K (“Form 10-K”) for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 by June 14, 2006 but deferred such filing for up to 15 calendar days as permitted under Rule 12b-25 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and thereafter filed a notice of such deferral with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on June 13, 2006.

	2.		As a result of the Company’s deferred filing of its Form 10-K, the Company stopped using its existing registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933 to sell interests in its Savings Harvest Plan to employees, from 4:00 p.m (ET) on Wednesday, June 14, 2006 through 5:30 p.m (ET) on Thursday, June 29, 2006 (the “Suspension Period”).

	3.		Due to matters that have recently come to light, the Company now believes it may need to restate its financial statements for some or all of the fiscal years ended March 31, 1999 through 2005 (as well as interim periods in these years and in fiscal year 2006) to reflect additional stock based compensation relating to employee option grants and revenue attributable to certain early contract renewals. The Company has not yet concluded whether it will restate its prior period financial statements or the related amounts at issue. However, in light of the above, the Company will be unable to file its Form 10-K within the additional time allowed under Rule 12b-25 of the Exchange Act and, therefore, will extend the Suspension period until 5:30 p.m. (ET) on Friday, July 28, 2006 (the “Extended Suspension Period”).

	4.		During the Extended Suspension Period, you, as a director or executive officer of the Company, may not, directly or indirectly, purchase, sell or otherwise acquire or transfer any common stock of the Company or any options, futures or other rights to acquire or dispose of the common stock of the Company (unless you establish, as required by applicable law, that certain conditions have been satisfied and you obtain the Company’s prior approval). These restrictions are imposed in light of Section 306 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The Company will further notify you if there are any changes in the Extended Suspension Period.


Contacts:	Dan Kaferle	Sam Pattanayak
	Public Relations	Investor Relations
	(631) 342-2111	(631) 342-5208
	daniel.kaferle@ca.com	sambit.pattanayak@ca.com

CA’s BOARD OF DIRECTORS APPROVES NEW $2 BILLION COMMON STOCK REPURCHASE PLAN

ISLANDIA, N.Y., June 29, 2006 – CA (NYSE:CA) today announced that its Board of Directors has authorized a new stock repurchase plan that enables the Company to buy $2 billion of its common stock in its current fiscal year ending March 31, 2007.

“CA’s Board of Directors and senior management have determined that a significant stock repurchase program is a timely and appropriate way to both enhance shareholder value and demonstrate our confidence in the long-term value of CA,” said John Swainson, CA’s president and chief executive officer. “As we evaluated our strategic use of capital, we came to the conclusion that this repurchase program is the best option.”

CA currently is exploring various options to best execute the stock repurchases and expects it will be financed through a combination of cash on hand and bank financing.

This will be subject to a review of the circumstances in place at the time, and will not be implemented until after the Company has filed its Annual Report on Form 10-K, which as separately announced today, has been delayed. Until the new plan is implemented, CA will continue to buy back common stock in accordance with the program announced in March 2006 which calls for regular repurchases in the open market of up to $600 million during the 2007 fiscal year.

As of March 31, 2006, outstanding shares of CA stock totaled 572 million.

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

changing operating environments, CA could lose customers and the demand for CA’s products and services could decrease; certain software that CA uses in daily operations is licensed from third parties and thus may not be available to CA in the future, which has the potential to delay product development and production; CA’s credit ratings have been downgraded and could be downgraded further which would require CA to pay additional interest under its credit agreement and could adversely affect CA’s ability to borrow; CA has a significant amount of debt; the failure to protect CA’s intellectual property rights would weaken its competitive position; CA may become dependent upon large transactions; general economic conditions may lead CA’s customers to delay or forgo technology upgrades; the market for some or all of CA’s key product areas may not grow; third parties could claim that CA’s products infringe their intellectual property rights; fluctuations in foreign currencies could result in translation losses; and the other factors described in CA’s Current Report on Form 8-K. CA assumes no obligation to update the information in this communication, except as otherwise required by law. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements that speak only as of the date hereof.

About CA

###


1-9247		13-2857434
(Commission File Number)		(IRS Employer Identification No.)

One CA Plaza
Islandia, New York		11749
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)		(Zip Code)

o		Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)

o		Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)

o		Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))

o		Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))


	CA, INC.
Date: June 29, 2006	By:	/s/ Kenneth V. Handal
		Kenneth V. Handal
		Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary


Contacts:	Dan Kaferle	Olivia Bellingham
	Public Relations	Investor Relations
	(631) 342-2111	(631) 342-4687
	daniel.kaferle@ca.com	olivia.bellingham@ca.com


	Three Months Ended			Fiscal Year Ended		Fiscal Year Ending
	March 31, 2006			March 31, 2006		March 31, 2007⁽¹⁾
(Loss) income from continuing operations	$	(0.06	)	$	0.23	$	0.44

Non-GAAP adjustments, net of taxes

Acquisition amortization		0.11			0.47		0.37
Acquisition IPR&D		0.00			0.02		0.00
Repatriation related taxes		0.06			0.00		0.00
Restructuring and other charges		0.03			0.09		0.02

Non-GAAP Diluted operating EPS	$	0.14		$	0.81	$	0.83


	FY2006		FY2005
Cash flow from operations	$	1,380	$	1,527


Benefit from tax law change		—		(300	)
Restitution fund		150		75
Restructuring		22		25

Adjusted cash flow from operations	$	1,552	$	1,327


	Page

The following Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements of CA, Inc. and subsidiaries are included in Items 8 and 9A:
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations — Years Ended March 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004		69
Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets — March 31, 2006 and 2005		70
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity — Years Ended March 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004		71
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows — Years Ended March 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004		72
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements		73
The following Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statement Schedule of CA, Inc. and subsidiaries is included in Item 15(c):
Schedule II — Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

	5.		Please note that you are also subject to the Company’s regular periodic trading blackout.

	6.		If you have any questions concerning this notice, you should contact Kenneth V. Handal or Lawrence Egan at One CA Plaza, Islandia, New York 11749, (631) 342-6000.

			Date: June 29, 2006