Section 12(b)		Section 12(g)		Section 15(d)		Name of Exchange (If Section 12(b))
Title of Class
Series 2017-2, Class A		¨		¨		x		________
Series 2017-2, Class B		¨		¨		x		________
Series 2017-2, Class C		¨		¨		x		________
Series 2018-2, Class A		¨		¨		x		________
Series 2018-2, Class B		¨		¨		x		________
Series 2018-2, Class C		¨		¨		x		________

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such requirements for the past 90 days. Yes: x No: ¨

PART I – Distribution Information.

Item 1. Distribution and Pool Performance Information. 

The response to Item 1 is set forth herein and in Exhibits 99.1 and 99.2

Charge-offs are executed on charge-off cycle dates which occur on various days during each distribution period. The number of different charge-off cycle dates in each distribution period varies based on such factors as the calendar and the timing of billing cycles. As a result, the amount of charged-off receivables can vary between distribution periods with no corresponding change in the performance of the trust portfolio. The following table sets forth the number of different charge-off cycle dates for each distribution period ending in the months indicated. Each distribution period begins on the first calendar day and ends on the last calendar day of the calendar month indicated below. 

No assets securitized by RFS Holding, L.L.C. (the “Securitizer”) and held by Synchrony Credit Card Master Note Trust were the subject of a demand to repurchase or replace for breach of the representations and warranties during the distribution period August 1, 2022 through August 31, 2022. The most recent Form ABS-15G filed by the Securitizer was filed on February 7, 2022. The CIK number of the Securitizer is 0001226006.

ITEM 1A – Asset-Level Information.

Inapplicable.

ITEM 1B – Asset Representations Reviewer and Investor Communication.  

Nothing to report.

PART II – Other Information

ITEM 2 – Legal Proceedings.

Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (“DBTCA”) and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company (“DBNTC”) have been sued by investors in civil litigation concerning their role as trustees of certain RMBS trusts.

On June 18, 2014, a group of investors, including funds managed by Blackrock Advisors, LLC, PIMCO-Advisors, L.P., and others, filed an action against DBNTC and DBTCA in New York State Supreme Court alleging that DBNTC and DBTCA failed to perform purported duties, as trustees for 544 private-label RMBS trusts, to enforce breaches of representations and warranties as to mortgage loans held by the trusts and to enforce breaches by servicers of their mortgage loan servicing obligations for the trusts. During the course of the litigation, plaintiffs dismissed the case from New York State Supreme Court and refiled two separate cases, one in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (the “BlackRock SDNY Case”) and the other in the Superior Court of California, Orange County (the “BlackRock California Case”). Pursuant to a settlement among the parties, the BlackRock SDNY Case was dismissed on December 6, 2018 and the BlackRock California Case was dismissed on January 11, 2019.

On September 27, 2017, DBTCA was added as a defendant to a case brought by certain special purpose entities including Phoenix Light SF Limited in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, in which the plaintiffs previously alleged incorrectly that DBNTC served as trustee for all 43 of the trusts at issue. On September 27, 2017, plaintiffs filed a third amended complaint that names DBTCA as a defendant in addition to DBNTC. DBTCA serves as trustee for one of the 43 trusts at issue. DBNTC serves as trustee for the other 42 trusts at issue. Plaintiffs’ third amended complaint brings claims for violation of the Trust Indenture Act, as amended (the “TIA”); breach of contract; breach of fiduciary duty; negligence and gross negligence; violation of the Streit Act; and breach of the covenant of good faith. However, in the third amended complaint, plaintiffs acknowledge that, before DBTCA was added to the case, the court dismissed plaintiffs’ TIA Act claims, negligence and gross negligence claims, Streit Act claims, claims for breach of the covenant of good faith, and certain theories of plaintiffs’ breach of contract claims, and plaintiffs only include these claims to preserve any rights on appeal. Plaintiffs allege damages of “hundreds of millions of dollars.” On November 13, 2017, DBNTC and DBTCA filed an answer to the third amended complaint. On December 7, 2018, DBNTC and DBTCA filed a motion for summary judgment. Also on December 7, 2018, plaintiffs, jointly with Commerzbank AG (see description of Commerzbank case below), filed a motion for partial summary judgment. On October 27, 2021, DBNTC and DBTCA filed a supplemental motion for summary judgment relating to plaintiffs’ standing. On February 8, 2022, the court issued an order in which it granted DBNTC and DBTCA’s supplemental motion for summary judgment, granted in part DBNTC and DBTCA’s initial motion for summary judgment, and denied plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment. As a result of that order, all of plaintiffs’ claims were dismissed with prejudice. On March 10, 2022, plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit with respect to the court’s orders on the motions to dismiss and for summary judgment.

On November 30, 2017, DBTCA was added as a defendant to a case brought by Commerzbank AG (“Commerzbank”) in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, in which Commerzbank previously alleged incorrectly that DBNTC served as trustee for all 50 of the trusts at issue. On November 30, 2017, Commerzbank filed a second amended complaint that names DBTCA as a defendant in addition to DBNTC. DBTCA serves as trustee for 1 of the 50 trusts at issue. DBNTC serves as trustee for the other 49 trusts at issue. Commerzbank’s second amended complaint brings claims for violation of the TIA; breach of contract; breach of fiduciary duty; negligence; violation of the Streit Act; and breach of the covenant of good faith. However, in the second amended complaint, Commerzbank acknowledges that, before DBTCA was added to the case, the court dismissed Commerzbank’s TIA claims for the trusts governed by pooling and servicing agreements, as well as its Streit Act claims and claims for breach of the covenant of good faith, and Commerzbank only includes these claims to preserve any rights on appeal. The second amended complaint alleges that DBNTC and DBTCA caused Commerzbank to suffer “hundreds of millions of dollars in losses,” but the complaint does not include a demand for money damages in a sum certain. On January 29, 2018, DBNTC and DBTCA filed an answer to the second amended complaint. On December 7, 2018, DBNTC and DBTCA filed a motion for summary judgment. Also on December 7, 2018, Commerzbank, jointly with the Phoenix Light plaintiffs, filed a motion for partial summary judgment. On February 8, 2022, the court issued an order in which it granted in part DBNTC and DBTCA’s motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment. As a result of that order, many of plaintiffs’ claims and theories were dismissed with prejudice. Discovery is ongoing.

On December 30, 2015, IKB International, S.A. in Liquidation and IKB Deutsche Industriebank A.G. (collectively, “IKB”), as an investor in 37 RMBS trusts, filed a summons with notice in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County, against DBNTC and DBTCA as trustees of the trusts.  On May 27, 2016, IKB served its complaint asserting claims for breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of duty to avoid conflicts of interest, violation of New York’s Streit Act, violation of the TIA, violation of Regulation AB, and violation of Section 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code.  IKB alleges that DBNTC and DBTCA are liable for over U.S. $268 million in damages. On October 5, 2016, DBNTC and DBTCA, together with several other trustees defending lawsuits by IKB, filed a joint motion to dismiss. On January 6, 2017, IKB filed a notice of discontinuance, voluntarily dismissing with prejudice all claims as to three trusts. On June 20, 2017, the parties filed a stipulation, voluntarily dismissing with prejudice all claims as to four additional trusts. On January 27, 2021, the court granted in part and denied in part DBNTC and DBTCA’s motion to dismiss. The court granted the motion to dismiss with respect to IKB’s claims for violations of the Streit Act, Regulation AB, and Section 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code, as well as certain aspects of IKB’s claims for breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, and violation of the TIA. The court denied the remainder of the motion to dismiss. IKB’s remaining claims for breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of duty to avoid conflicts of interest, and violation of the TIA will proceed. On May 10, 2021, DBNTC and DBTCA filed a notice of appeal with the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division, First Department, regarding certain aspects of the court’s order on the motion to dismiss. On May 20, 2021, IKB filed a notice of cross appeal with respect to other aspects of that order. On August 30, 2022, the New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department affirmed in part and reversed in part the court’s order on the motion to dismiss. On June 2, 2021, IKB filed a motion for re-argument regarding certain aspects of the court’s order, on the motion to dismiss, which the court denied on August 3, 2021. On May 13, 2021, DBNTC and DBTCA filed an answer to the complaint. On October 28, 2021, the parties filed a stipulation, voluntarily dismissing with prejudice all claims as to seven additional trusts. On December 29, 2021, the parties filed a stipulation, voluntarily dismissing with prejudice all claims as to one additional trust. On April 22, 2022, the parties filed a stipulation, voluntarily dismissing with prejudice all claims as to 17 certificates at issue (including all claims as to 5 trusts), leaving 17 trusts at issue. Discovery is ongoing.

It is DBTCA’s belief that it has no pending legal proceedings (including, based on DBTCA's present evaluation, the litigation disclosed in the foregoing paragraphs) that would materially affect its ability to perform its duties as indenture trustee on behalf of the noteholders.

ITEM 10 – Exhibits

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Exhibit 99.1

Monthly Noteholder's Statement

Synchrony Credit Card Master Note Trust

Series 2017-2

Class A 2.6200% Notes
Class B 2.8200% Notes
Class C 3.0100% Notes
Class D 3.4100% Notes

Pursuant to the Master Indenture, dated as of September 25, 2003 (as amended and supplemented, the "Indenture") between Synchrony Credit Card Master Note Trust (the "Issuer") and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as indenture trustee (the "Indenture Trustee"), as supplemented by the Series 2017-2 Indenture Supplement (the "Indenture Supplement"), dated as of November 02, 2017, between the Issuer and the Indenture Trustee, the Issuer is required to prepare, or cause the Servicer to prepare, certain information each month regarding current distributions to the Series 2017-2 Noteholders and the performance of the Trust during the previous month.  The information required to be prepared with respect to the Payment Date of September 15, 2022, and with respect to the performance of the Trust during the Monthly Period ended August 31, 2022 is set forth below.  Capitalized terms used herein are defined in the Indenture and the Indenture Supplement. The Discount Percentage (as defined in the Transfer Agreement) remains at 0% for all the Receivables in the Trust until otherwise indicated.  The undersigned, an Authorized Officer of the Servicer, does hereby certify as follows:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Monthly Noteholder's Statement as of the 13th day of September 2022.

*Calculated after giving effect to any payment of principal on Notes to occur on the related Payment Date.

Exhibit 99.2

Monthly Noteholder's Statement

Synchrony Credit Card Master Note Trust

Series 2018-2

Class A 3.4700% Notes
Class B 3.6700% Notes
Class C 3.8700% Notes

Pursuant to the Master Indenture, dated as of September 25, 2003 (as amended and supplemented, the "Indenture") between Synchrony Credit Card Master Note Trust (the "Issuer") and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as indenture trustee (the "Indenture Trustee"), as supplemented by the Series 2018-2 Indenture Supplement (the "Indenture Supplement"), dated as of June 01, 2018, between the Issuer and the Indenture Trustee, the Issuer is required to prepare, or cause the Servicer to prepare, certain information each month regarding current distributions to the Series 2018-2 Noteholders and the performance of the Trust during the previous month. The information required to be prepared with respect to the Payment Date of September 15, 2022, and with respect to the performance of the Trust during the Monthly Period ended August 31, 2022 is set forth below. Capitalized terms used herein are defined in the Indenture and the Indenture Supplement. The Discount Percentage (as defined in the Transfer Agreement) remains at 0% for all the Receivables in the Trust until otherwise indicated. The undersigned, an Authorized Officer of the Servicer, does hereby certify as follows:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Monthly Noteholder's Statement as of the 13th day of September 2022.

*Calculated after giving effect to any payment of principal on Notes to occur on the related Payment Date.